Package: logrotate
Version: 3.7-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
If there is a file in /etc/logrotate.d, which refers to some glob
pattern (in my case it was /var/log/mgetty/*.log), and there is no files
matching this pattern, logrotate stops upon processing this file and
reopen 317332
thanks
i don't have it installed:
Preparing to replace udev 0.056-3 (using .../udev_0.063-1_powerpc.deb) ...
udev requires a kernel >= 2.6.12, upgrade aborted.
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/udev_0.063-1_powerpc.deb
(--unpack):
subprocess pre-installation script re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 317332
Bug#317332: udev 0.060-1 should be used with a >= 2.6.12 kernel
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 21:32:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318981: fixed in evolution-data-server 1.2.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 317283 libgal2.4-0 2.4.2-1
Bug#317283: libgal 2.4.2 crashes evolution when using libgnomecanvas 2.10
Warning: Unknown package 'libgal2.4'
Bug reassigned from package `libgal2.4' to `libgal2.4-0'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please cont
retitle 317283 libgal 2.4.2 crashes evolution when using libgnomecanvas 2.10
reassign 317283 libgal2.4 2.4.2-1
notfound 317283 2.4.3-1
thanks
Ok, sorry for all the noise. I finally found the root of the problem.
libgal2.4 version 2.4.2-1 (etch's) is buggy.
But libgnomecanvas2-0 version 2.8.0-1 (
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 317283 libgal 2.4.2 crashes evolution when using libgnomecanvas 2.10
Bug#317283: evolution: Evo crashes upon startup
Changed Bug title.
> reassign 317283 libgal2.4 2.4.2-1
Bug#317283: libgal 2.4.2 crashes evolution when using libgnomecanvas 2.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> # package only breaks itself, no data loss reported
> severity 320733 grave
Bug#320733: thunderbird bug
Severity set to `grave'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 18:47:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318710: fixed in icheck 0.9.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: mozilla-thunderbird
Version: 1.0.6-1
Severity: critical
After upgrading from 1.0.2, Thunderbird downloads mail
and files a junk msg into Junk folder. I click on Junk
folder and Thunderbird freezes or closes down and
disappears. Happened twice in a row. Downgraded to
1.0.2 and everything i
Hi!
It's me again. I've spent more than two hours upgrading libraries to try
and find out the cause of the crash, with no luck.
After this much upgrade/downgrade, I'd like to ask you all, if you still
can reproduce the crash, to answer the following questions:
1) Does the crash happen if you mo
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 17:17:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319527: fixed in qemu 0.7.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 17:17:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#285626: fixed in dircproxy 1.0.5-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 17:17:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#290287: fixed in apache 1.3.33-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 17:02:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320361: fixed in rt2500 1.1.0+cvs20050710-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 320728 serious
Bug#320728: openoffice.org2: Missing Dependency on libstlport4.6.
Severity set to `serious'.
> retitle 320728 openoffice.org2: Missing Dependency on libstlport4.6c2.
Bug#320728: openoffice.org2: Missing Dependency on libstlport4
Hola Ross Boylan!
> Upgrade->crash
> downgrade->working.
> Here was the upgrade:
> Inst libgnomecanvas2-0 [2.8.0-1] (2.10.2-2 Debian:testing) []
> Inst libgnomecanvas2-common [2.8.0-1] (2.10.2-2 Debian:testing)
Could you please send the dependency information output by
reportbug --template evol
On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 08:08:45PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> gnome-vfs2 is currently kept out of testing because of a RC bug
> requesting its rebuild against a transitionned fam, for the C++
> transition (#319833). This bug was tagged as "sid" by Steve Langasek.
> While this is trivial to f
tags 319526 + confirmed patch pending
thanks
Hello
The attached patch has been forwarded separately to the Security Team
which will probably make a DSA from it.
bye,
-christian-
diff -u mysql-dfsg-4.1-4.1.11a/debian/patches/00list
mysql-dfsg-4.1-4.1.11a/debian/patches/00list
--- mysql-dfsg-4.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 319526 + confirmed patch pending
Bug#319526: mysql-server: An update to MySQL version 4.1.12 fixes a low-impact
security problem
Tags were: sarge security
Tags added: confirmed, patch, pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
reopen 318710
thanks
Now we get this instead:
Differences in canonify output
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
struct foo;
# 1 "t/02_struct/source/bar.c"
-struct __attribute__((aligned(__alignof__(int foo
+struct __attribute__((aligned(__alignof__(long int foo
int is 32 bit, long is 64 bit.
Kurt
--
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 320715 sid
Bug#320715: synaptic: Broken dependency - libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5-3.9
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 318710
Bug#318710: icheck: structural alignment is arch-dep in canonical form
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 10:48:48PM +0100, Mark Purcell wrote:
> Bug #315532 has been rasied as grave security related bug against
> asterisk-1.0.7, which is included in the released sarge.
> It refers to a potential overflow in the Asterisk Manager Interface, which is
> not enabled by default in
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 23:34:00 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed from Debian - unmaintained
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 23:34:43 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed from Debian - unmaintained
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 23:35:26 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed from Debian - unmaintained
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 23:34:36 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed from Debian - unmaintained
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
tags 317393 + pending
kthxbye
[Wed, 27 Jul 2005] Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > linking libtunepimp2 against libstdc++.so.6 crashes amarok of
> > unstable, because amarok is linked (as the whole kde-stuff) against
> > libstdc++.so.5.
>
> Robert, since this can't get fixed by a sourceful upload, how d
Package: capi4hylafax
Version: 1:01.02.03-10
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
c2faxrecv segfaults when a fax transmission comes in. I use a AVM B1
PCI V4.0-Card. Here are the interesting error messages:
luggage:/var/log# dmesg|grep B1
b1pci: PCI BIOS reports AVM-B1 V4 at i/
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 23:32:54 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed from Debian - unmaintained
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 23:35:37 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed from Debian - unmaintained
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: lookup
Version: 1.08b-9
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
lookup segfaults at start, by consequence the following packages are
uninstallable:
edict
kanjidic
kiten
kdeedu
kde-amusements
kde
sdic-edict
xjdic
due to dependency problems
-- System Infor
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 23:33:35 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed from Debian - unmaintained
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 23:34:36 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed from Debian - unmaintained
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 23:33:35 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed from Debian - unmaintained
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 23:33:35 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed from Debian - unmaintained
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 23:33:35 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed from Debian - unmaintained
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 23:33:35 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed from Debian - unmaintained
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 23:32:54 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed from Debian - unmaintained
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 23:33:35 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed from Debian - unmaintained
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 317393 + pending
Bug#317393: libtunepimp2: compiled against new C++ ABI without renaming package
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> kthxbye
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Package: htmlgen
Version: 1.8.24-1
Severity: serious
please build in a current unstable build environment, tighten the
build dependency on the libfltk1.1 development package.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: synaptic
Version: 0.57.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The latest apt-get dist-upgrade on my SID system deinstalled synaptic.
When I tried to reinstall it, I got the following message:
Les paquets suivants contiennent des dépendances non satisfaites :
synap
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 14:47:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320624: fixed in pcre-ocaml 5.10.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Bug #315532 has been rasied as grave security related bug against
asterisk-1.0.7, which is included in the released sarge.
It refers to a potential overflow in the Asterisk Manager Interface, which is
not enabled by default in the Debian asterisk package. In addition the
Debian asterisk packag
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 320713 serious
Bug#320713: dhcp3: FTBFS: install: cannot change ownership of
`client/scripts/debian': Operation not permitted
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 14:32:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298674: fixed in bayonne 1.2.14pl2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 23:33:34 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Acknowledging NMU
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 23:40:46 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Acknowledging NMU
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 23:12:55 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bug already fixed, closing the report... (was Bug #319965:
libboost-date-time1.33.0: bad shlibs file)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 297924 serious
Bug#297924: ode: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from 'Opcode::AABBTreeNode*' to
'udword' loses precision
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 316584 serious
Bug#316584: libmusicbrainz-2.1: FTBFS with g++-4.0: cast from 'char*' to 'int'
loses precision
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 22:10:17 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
has caused the Debian Bug report #298674,
regarding bayonne: ftbfs [sparc] cannot find -lccscript
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(NB: If you are a syst
On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 10:09:12PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>
> Dear Markus,
> since I will be away in the next days and I don't want the pcre-ocaml
> debian package to be unbuildable for long I applied a quick and dirty
> patch to OCamlMakefile, which simply passes -fPIC to the building
Hi
Don Armstrong schrieb:
> On Sat, 30 Jul 2005, Arthur Korn wrote:
> > Have a look at:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=pkg&data=devtodo&archive=no&version=&dist=unstable
> > This is what the form at
> > http://www.debian.org/Bugs/
> > came up with when I selected
> >
> > s
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 13:17:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#258511: fixed in af 2.4.3-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 13:17:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320663: fixed in courier 0.47-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 12:29:11PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> AFAICT the bug is in OCamlMakefile which fails to pass PIC_CFLAGS when
> inovking ocamlmklib. I thus suppose that adding "-ccopt -fPIC" in the
> "$(DLLSONAME)" rule would be enough. Still, since I don't know
> OCamlMakefile in de
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassgn 319526 mysql-server-4.1
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> severity 319526 grave
Bug#319526: mysql-server: An update to MySQL version 4.1.12 fixes a low-impact
security problem
Severity set to `grave'.
> tags 319526 + sarge
Package: ayttm
Version: 0.4.6+26-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Since quite a few weeks ago, I am not able to connect to MSN messenger.
The login try fails with the message:
Could not connect to MSN HTTPS server (bad cooki
The following diff disables gimp-print support. Unless there are any
objections to the diff, or you intend to upload shortly, I will NMU
this in a short while.
Regards,
Roger
diff -urN gs-esp-7.07.1.original/debian/changelog gs-esp-7.07.1/debian/changelog
--- gs-esp-7.07.1.original/debian/chan
Hi
On 2005-07-31 bert hubert wrote:
> Thanks for the clarification - any idea on when this will be fixed?
> Is there a workaround?
The 5.0 packages have just been accepted. So it's just a bit work to get the
packages build on all architectures and then we're fine.
bye,
-christian-
--
To UNSU
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 11:02:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318710: fixed in icheck 0.9.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
On Sun, 31 Jul 2005 13:38:16 +0200
Willi Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > As per $SUBJECT. I expect that this file ought to be marked as a
> > conffile; in any event, the current behaviour is likely to break the
> > package every time it is upgraded.
>
> Confirmed:
>
> $ interdiff -z couri
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 320691 lbt [gcc-4.0 transition] FTBFS on m68k
Bug#320691: FTBFS on m68k
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Has any progress been made with this bug?
Malc Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What I don't get is that you *do* include the standard headers, but
> > then you go and prototype their content *again*, by hand. This is
> > obviously prone t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 300272 + fixed
Bug#300272: mailliststat: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): array type has incomplete
element type
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admin
Package: lbt
Version: 1.2.2-2
Severity: serious
Failure to build from source on m68k with gcc-4.0. Build-log:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=lbt&ver=1.2.2-2&arch=m68k&stamp=1120730253&file=log&as=raw
This could be solved by compiling on m68k with "-O2" instead on "-O3".
However, the re
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 09:47:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319126: fixed in libdebtags1 1.0.7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 04:54:14PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> /tmp/buildd/atlas-3.2.1ln/include/contrib/camm_dpa.h:766: error: memory input
> 2 is not directly addressable
>
> Line 766 is the start of a block of ix86 inline assembly.
> Unfortunately, I do not know assembly. The ASM macro expand
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 320357
Bug#320357: fetchmail: CAN-2005-2335 unfixed in unstable, stable and possibly
oldstable
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> tags 320357 + sarge etch
Bug#320357: fetchmail: CAN-2005-2335 unfixed in unstable, stable and possibly
oldst
tags 259671 + pending
thanks
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005, Matt Kraai wrote:
> /usr/lib/libvte.la contains "-lSM" in its dependency_libs variable,
> but libvte-dev doesn't depend on libsm-dev, so gtkterm again fails to
> build.
I've prepared a fix for this. FYI, it seems that "-lSM" doesn'
reopen 320257
tags 320257 + sarge etch security
Hi Helge,
* Helge Kreutzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-31 17:22]:
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 04:18:54AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > hi,
> > this is fixed with -18 revision, thanks for reporting it.
> > regards nico
>
> I could not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
To follow up:
/tmp/buildd/atlas-3.2.1ln/include/contrib/camm_dpa.h: In function 'dp2dpNb0':
/tmp/buildd/atlas-3.2.1ln/include/contrib/camm_dpa.h:766: error: memory input 2
is not directly addressable
/tmp/buildd/atlas-3.2.1ln/include/contrib/camm_dpa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 259671 + pending
Bug#259671: Missing dependency on libsm-dev
Tags were: fixed
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs d
Thanks for the clarification - any idea on when this will be fixed?
Is there a workaround?
Thanks.
--
http://www.PowerDNS.com Open source, database driven DNS Software
http://netherlabs.nl Open and Closed source services
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 319430 + fixed
Bug#319430: FTBFS: Obsolete build-dependency on alsa-headers
Tags were: pending patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 08:02:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319569: fixed in cvsbook 1.21-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
As I mentioned last week, I've now NMUd dosbox. The final diff is
detailed below (no changes other than adding the bug number to the
changelog). The automatic config.sub and config.guess updates are
omitted from the diff.
Regards,
Roger
diff -urN dosbox-0.63.original/debian/changelog dosbox-0
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> reassign 320622 ocaml
Bug#320622: ocalm: FTBFS: ../ocamlopt: Command not found
Bug reassigned from package `ocaml' to `ocaml'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please con
On Sunday 31 July 2005 08:14, Wesley J. Landaker wrote:
> Unfortunately, now you've just compiled cheesetracker against two
> different C++ ABIs, and since half of the old dependencies are out of the
> archive, and the new ABIs of new dependencies aren't all in, I can't even
> fix it.
Not only tha
On Sunday 31 July 2005 05:11, Andreas Barth wrote:
> I uploaded an NMU of your package. This was necessary to make a FTBFS to
> go away. Please find the used diff below.
I'm sure you were just trying to help, but that was totally rude; please
read the bug in question, and contact me ahead of time
Hello,
On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 04:18:54AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> hi,
> this is fixed with -18 revision, thanks for reporting it.
> regards nico
I could not find a DSA (neither for woody nor for sarge). Looking in
my i386 changeroot (Sarge, with security):
remaxp:/# apt-cache po
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 318392 318994
Bug#318392: libmodplug: Gcc-4 transition
Bug#318994: libmodplug: rebuild needed for C++ ABI transition (NMU patch
attached)
Merged 318392 318994.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.2
> merge 320582 320621
Bug#320582: libdjvulibre1: soname of library changed
Bug#320621: libdjvulibre1 3.5.14-6 changes soname without warning
Merged 320582 320621.
>
End of message, stop
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 06:32:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318892: fixed in torrus 1.0.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 317283 - unreproducible
Bug#317283: evolution: Evo crashes upon startup
Tags were: unreproducible
Tags removed: unreproducible
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admin
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 06:02:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318220: fixed in archzoom 0.5.0+patch-304-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 06:32:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301388: fixed in verilog 0.8-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 08:45:59 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fpath breakage
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to r
> After upgrading to the current unstable version of bogofilter-bdb,
> bogofilter seems to get stuck in an endless loop on every operation
> accessing the wordlist.db. This happens even with an nonexisting
> wordlist.db, an new one is created in this case, but bogofilter gets
> stuck anyway.
Do yo
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 05:32:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#286732: fixed in gift-gnutella 0.0.10.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 14:43:01 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in 1.9.121-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 317600 serious
Bug#317600: guile-1.6: guile-snarf doesn't work with gcc 4
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 05:08:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#303856: fixed in libpolyxmass 0.8.8-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 14:27:51 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line 2.6.12 has been uploaded
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 317229 + fixed
Bug#317229: libjack0.80.0-0 removed from unstable; rebuild required
Tags were: sid
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 317223 + fixed
Bug#317223: libjack0.80.0-0 removed from unstable; rebuild required
Tags were: sid
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 315633 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#315633: dangling symlinks
Tags were: pending
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
> tag 317541 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#317541: missing build dependency imagemagick
Tags were: pending experimental
Tags added: fixe
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
