Package: libccscript
Version: 2.5.7-4
Severity: serious
Hi,
There was an error trying to autobuild your package. From the build log:
Automatic build of libccscript_2.5.7-4 on kiivi by sbuild/m68k 27
Build started at 20050711-0736
**
severity 317451 important
tags 317451 unreproducible
thanks
I am downgrading this bug. While the slang2 version of it was indeed
serious, I cannot reproduce it (yet) on slang1 (slang failing on
libfribidi not being present).
Regards
Alastair
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 317451 important
Bug#317451: sympa: can't install : frontend goes wild
Severity set to `important'.
> tags 317451 unreproducible
Bug#317451: sympa: can't install : frontend goes wild
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
> thanks
Hi,
Having udev disable itself on reboot and leaving the system
non-functional is not an acceptable solution. Most systems have
multiple kernel images installed, having only some of them working,
and breaking the whole system if the system boots some other image (I
have unstable, stabl
Your message dated Mon, 11 Jul 2005 00:03:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301316: fixed in icu 2.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 11:49:22AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 12:56:52AM +0200, Jakob Bohm wrote:
> >
> > Am I understanding you correctly when I read it as saying that kernel 2.6.12
> > (a point release in the "stable" branch)
>
> There is no more "stable" or "development" k
Your message dated Mon, 11 Jul 2005 00:03:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301316: fixed in icu 2.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Mon, 11 Jul 2005 00:00:55 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317668: fixed in coin2 2.4.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 317700 + fixed
Bug#317700: Rebuild for C++ transition
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs databa
Yes, I agree that is less intrusive.
> On 2005-07-10 06:25 PDT, Roger Leigh writes:
Roger> The following patch may be less intrusive, and so more
Roger> acceptable to upstream:
--
Karl 2005-07-10 20:46
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jul 2005 20:51:30 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#316453: found a "not-so-bad" solution
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jul 2005 20:51:30 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#316453: found a "not-so-bad" solution
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 08:01:42PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Already fixed in the -5 upload.
Yay!
> Maybe it's better to wait a little while
> for the C++ transition to progress before filing RC bugs against these
> packages? :)
I'm not sure whether the ":)"
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 317702 sid
Bug#317702: aspell-fr: Need to be rebuild against new libaspell15
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 316579 sarge
Bug#316579: fam: compact flash card destroyed
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need a
Package: udev
Version: 0.062-3
Followup-For: Bug #317332
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've built my own 2.6.12.2 kernel image from vanilla sources using
kernel-package an tested the upgrade to udev-0.062-3.
The nvidia, alsa and possibly other devices are still not created in
/
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jul 2005 16:13:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317677: Can not install libct3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 317668 sid
Bug#317668: ABI change without package rename
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assis
-- Forwarded message --
From: Pascal Giard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jul 10, 2005 10:23 PM
Subject: Re: Bug#316453: found a "not-so-bad" solution
To: Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Just a though: Ubuntu?
nope, pure Debian.
> > /lib64
> > /usr/lib
> > /usr/lib64
> > /
On Jul 10, Jakob Bohm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Upgrading the kernel is a non-option for solving this. It is technically
It's the best option we have so far, but you choose to ignore it.
> Like it or not, udev in etch MUST be a valid, functional, drop-in, no-reboot
> upgrade from udev in sarg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuan-kai Lin wrote:
> I have been a little busy lately, so you are welcome to do the NMU.
Okay thanks. I will go ahead and upload it to 0-day then.
Attached is the NMU patch.
Cheers,
- -Mike
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/L
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 01:02:11AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jul 10, Jakob Bohm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It seams that if getting udev 0.6x quickly rewritten to support all
> > udev-based kernels in one version is too much work or too controversial, you
> > should do what modutils, c
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jul 2005 17:02:12 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#259634: fixed in pam 0.76-23
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 03:57:22PM -0400, Mike Furr wrote:
> fam needs to be rebuilt for the c++ transition. Today marks 5 days since
> the new gcc packages were uploaded (the only c++ dep) and so I plan to
> NMU into DELAYED/2-day. The new binary name will be libfam0 to match
> what ubuntu has d
2005/7/10, Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Before doing that, see the NEWS.Debian.gz shipped with aspell that says:
>
> aspell (0.60.3-2) unstable; urgency=low
>
> This release begins a transition to support building the dictionary
> binary hashes at install-time. As part of the trans
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Leidert wrote:
> AFAIK it should be libfam0c2 (like libaspell15c2, libwpd8c2, ...). See:
> http://groups.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=%3C4mf37-Fq-11%40gated-at.bofh.it%3E
No, it can be either, see:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/20
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 10:35:28PM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> AFAIK it should be libfam0c2 (like libaspell15c2, libwpd8c2, ...). See:
> http://groups.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=%3C4mf37-Fq-11%40gated-at.bofh.it%3E
Not necessarily, since it is currently called libfam0c102, so libfam0 is
indeed
Pascal Giard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Under Debian /lib64 is a link to /lib.
>
> yes i know, i was also surprised to see that it was working by adding
> /lib to LD_LIBRARY_PATH in the mkinitrd.conf.
>
>> /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 has
>> to exist. Your change should have no effect at all as
Pascal Giard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Under Debian /lib64 is a link to /lib.
>
> yes i know, i was also surprised to see that it was working by adding
> /lib to LD_LIBRARY_PATH in the mkinitrd.conf.
>
>> /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 has
>> to exist. Your change should have no effect at all as
Am Sonntag, den 10.07.2005, 15:57 -0400 schrieb Mike Furr:
> Package: fam
> Version: 2.7.0-7
> Severity: grave
>
> fam needs to be rebuilt for the c++ transition. Today marks 5 days since
> the new gcc packages were uploaded (the only c++ dep) and so I plan to
> NMU into DELAYED/2-day. The new b
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jul 2005 22:03:37 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line recompile against new libjack
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Michael Bonhomme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: aspell-fr
> Version: 0.50-3-4
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> New version of libaspell15 is now called libaspell15c2 (compiled with
> g++-4.0 which has a new ABI), so please rebuild aspell-fr.
Before doing tha
Package: aspell-fr
Version: 0.50-3-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
New version of libaspell15 is now called libaspell15c2 (compiled with
g++-4.0 which has a new ABI), so please rebuild aspell-fr.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unsta
Package: xsupplicant
Version: 1.0.1-4
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
When xsupplicant is started on boot, my wireless card is not "up".
In that situation, xsupplicant happily dumps configuration settings,
including username/password settings, to /var/log/xsupplica
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jul 2005 22:08:16 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed version had entered sarge (was: crosshurd: Tries to copy
a file from sysvinit package even on hurd-i386)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Package: fam
Version: 2.7.0-7
Severity: grave
fam needs to be rebuilt for the c++ transition. Today marks 5 days since
the new gcc packages were uploaded (the only c++ dep) and so I plan to
NMU into DELAYED/2-day. The new binary name will be libfam0 to match
what ubuntu has done.
-- System Info
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jul 2005 15:49:01 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#294435: fixed in papaya 0.97.20031122-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jul 2005 15:49:39 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317603: fixed in tla 1.3.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 314923 - unreproducible
Bug#314923: grace6: xmgrace exits with "Broken or incomplete installation -
read the FAQ!"
Tags were: unreproducible
Tags removed: unreproducible
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jul 2005 14:47:06 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317682: fixed in libsigc++-2.0 2.0.10-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 12:56:52AM +0200, Jakob Bohm wrote:
>
> Am I understanding you correctly when I read it as saying that kernel 2.6.12
> (a point release in the "stable" branch)
There is no more "stable" or "development" kernel branches anymore,
haven't been for quite some time. So this st
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jul 2005 14:17:19 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#313555: fixed in java-package 0.25
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jul 2005 14:17:19 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#313555: fixed in java-package 0.25
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jul 2005 14:17:19 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#313555: fixed in java-package 0.25
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 04:12:29PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> I'm fairly certain the version of fam that was installed was 2.7.0-6
> as that's the version that still has an entry in /var/lib/dpkg/status:
That settles the question then. I will prepare an upload to sarge with
the #234787 patc
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jul 2005 14:02:28 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317519: fixed in autofs 4.1.4-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
> Under Debian /lib64 is a link to /lib.
yes i know, i was also surprised to see that it was working by adding
/lib to LD_LIBRARY_PATH in the mkinitrd.conf.
> /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 has
> to exist. Your change should have no effect at all as LD_LIBRARY_PATH
> is usualy unset and /lib is alre
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 314764 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#314764: poldi: FTBFS in experimental: Not using -fPIC to build shared lib.
Tags were: experimental
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Deb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 311615 + fixed
Bug#311615: ettercap: [CAN-2005-1796] buffer overflow in ec_curses.c
Tags were: sarge patch security
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administra
0.060 still works for me in sid but the recent 0.062 breaks my system.
I'm running a 2.6.11 kernel. When upgrading to 0.062 X doesn't see my
mouse anymore (/dev/psaux does not exist), my mixer settings can't be
set etc.
Jaap
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
Package: hpijs
Version: 2.1.2+0.9.2-2
Severity: grave
At debconf5 we tried to setup cups and hpijs for an HP laserjet 3500 on
powerpc machines. Apparently this causes a wrong command stream to be
sent to the printer which trying to print anything. The only output is
an error page complaining about
Package: libsigc++-2.0-0c2
Version: 2.0.10-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 8.6.3
It seems to me that libsigc++-2.0-0c2 has a broken shlibs file:
$ cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/libsigc++-2.0-0c2.shlibs
libsigc-2.0 0 libsigc++-2.0-0 (>= 2.0.2)
This causes my package to depend on libsigc++-2.0-
Subject of bug should be bittorrent_3.4.2-4_all.deb
--
http://edd.link9.net - http://irc.is-cool.net
pgpurNE8W885q.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: serious
Since aptitude depends on libsigc++1.2, and is an important
package, libsigc++1.2 should be promoted to the same
priority; important.
Required by the new debootstrap.
I'm not quite sure why this problem isn't caught elsewhere,
but I'm reporting it
Package: libcoin40
Version: 2.4.3-1
Severity: critical
This upload is built against GCC 4.0, but I neglected to
change the package name.
Don't install this one. A new package is being prepared.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990,
How can I install apt keys ? I have "apt-key" and "apt-key list" give me :
# apt-key list
gpg: /etc/apt/trustdb.gpg: trustdb created
/etc/apt/trusted.gpg
pub 1024R/1DB114E0 2004-01-15 [expired: 2005-01-27)]
uid Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (2004)
<
On 7/10/05, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It looks a lot like you are trying to build this kernel with gcc-4.0.
> This will not work. Please use gcc-3.2.
Perhaps a dependency/conflict entry needs to be assigned to the
package, because it broke after a standard package upgrade. I will
resubm
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jul 2005 09:32:05 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#315064: fixed in ruby1.8 1.8.2-7sarge1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jul 2005 15:27:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
The following patch may be less intrusive, and so more acceptable to
upstream:
--- evolver-2.23.original/src/include.h 2005-07-10 14:17:10.0 +0100
+++ evolver-2.23/src/include.h 2005-07-10 14:22:09.511149176 +0100
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@
/* MAXALLOC is maximum size allocable by calloc() */
Package: zeroconf
Version: 0.3-1
Severity: critical
It appears that zeroconf can get itself into a state where it
continually loops, issuing ARP requests for IP addresses which other
computers already have assigned. Looking at the code there appears to
be no attempt to restrict the number of addr
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jul 2005 09:17:03 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#218978: fixed in jwhois 3.2.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
On 10 Jul, Roger Leigh wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Malc Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On 09 Jul, Roger Leigh wrote:
> >>
> >> * It's written in K&R C. This has been obsolete for 16 years, and
> >> must be converted. GCC will not support K&R forever
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jul 2005 08:17:31 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317263: fixed in egroupware 1.0.0.007-2.dfsg-2sarge1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
While reviewing the source, I found a number of problems which are not
addressed by Andreas' patch.
1) -Wformat-non-literal is replaced by -Wformat-nonliteral, so
replacing, rather than removing, this flag may be more
appropriate.
2) Most o
Pascal Giard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> reassign 316476 initrd-tools
> reassign 316453 initrd-tools
> thx!
>
> First of all, i'm reassigning this to initrd-tools as this is not
> related to the kernel-source nor image.
>
> I found a quite good solution to solve the issue.
>
> in my /etc/mk
On Sunday 10 July 2005 11:08, Steve Langasek wrote:
> This bug is 100% unreproducible for me here. Are you sure
> "123.123.123.123:80" is configured as a NameVirtualHost? Do the
> "auto_prepend_file" values from phpinfo() match the "SERVER_NAME" values?
Yes I'm sure, I have about 50 (sub-)domain
Package: kmail
Version: 4:3.3.2-3
Followup-For: Bug #317098
Most kde applications work well (I've not tried them all). gdb gives
program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 1110643360 (LWP 3444)]
0x40e1d95b in QString::QString () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
hope it
: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
I have just tried recompiling the kernel, to catch up with some security
issues, but the compile fails. I am using:
---
make-kpkg --append-to-version=.20050710 --revision=10 kernel_image
modules
---
The bit with the error in it is
Package: cdbs
Version: 0.4.31
Severity: serious
>From my build log:
...
make -C guide
make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/cdbs-0.4.31/guide'
(xmllint --xinclude --postvalid --noblanks --noout cdbs-doc.xml 2>&1)
>cdbs-doc_error.log
make[1]: *** [check.tmp] Error 127
make[1]: Leaving director
Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
>
> Some time ago, a bug was posted about tiff being vulnerable to
> CAN-2005-1544: a bug that caused and exploitable segmentation fault on
> files with certain bad BitsPerSample values (making it a potential DOS
> bug). The fix is already in sarge. I had posted a patch aga
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 11:18:29AM +0100, George B. wrote:
> Package: kernel-source-2.4.27
> Version: 2.4.27-10
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Hello,
>
> I have just tried recompiling the kernel, to catch up with some security
> issues, but the compile fails. I a
Package: kernel-source-2.4.27
Version: 2.4.27-10
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
I have just tried recompiling the kernel, to catch up with some security
issues, but the compile fails. I am using:
---
make-kpkg --append-to-version=.20050710 --revision=10
on 07/10/05 15:28, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
Package: bookmarkbridge
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
Hi.
Package: bookmarkbridge
Architecture: i386
Version: 0.72-5
Depends: libqt3c102-mt (>= 3:3.3.4), libstdc++6 (>= 4.0.0-10)
seems like you didn't read the C++ tra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Malc Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 09 Jul, Roger Leigh wrote:
>>
>> * It's written in K&R C. This has been obsolete for 16 years, and
>> must be converted. GCC will not support K&R forever; -traditional
>> has already been removed.
>
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 06:55:49PM +1000, Kai Hendry wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 12:43:44AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > How? Are you saying that using feh as an image viewer causes the images to
> > be edited?
> Yes, when you rotate an image.
Ok, I can confirm this bug; however, the me
Looks like udev is the problem here. Try downgrading udev < 0.060...
I had exactly the same issues, couldn't start X no mice, couldn't load ALSA
hardware...
I downgraded to udev/testing (0.056-3) and everything is working again.
Have a look at http://bugs.debian.org/317626, http://bugs.debian.
tags 317577 unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 10:03:58PM +0200, Carsten Wolff wrote:
> I have several virtualhosts on my system. Some of them I had configured
> to use phpbb2 from debian. For that the phpbb2-package suggests to load
> per-virtualhost configurations by adding a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 317577 unreproducible moreinfo
Bug#317577: libapache-mod-php4: php_value specified in within a
virtualhost-section may spread to other v-hosts
Tags were: security
Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please con
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 12:43:44AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> How? Are you saying that using feh as an image viewer causes the images to
> be edited?
Yes, when you rotate an image.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005, CaT wrote:
> Package: procmail
> Version: 3.22-11
> Severity: critical
> Justification: causes serious data loss
Please don't just show me your logs. I need a way to *reproduce* the
data loss, including a minimal .procmailrc showing such behaviour,
and an exact description of
Package: xine-ui
Version: 0.99.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
as subject said. I tried to use -d option but it doesn't give any more info.
I tried to read the source but without a way to tell libxine to printout more
debugging info, it is almost impossible to trace
I
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 10:57:59PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 12:42:45PM +1000, Kai Hendry wrote:
> > Package: feh
> > Version: 1.3.2-1
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> > If I rotate an image with feh I lose my EXIF information in my JPEG
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 05:32:16PM +1000, Kai Hendry wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 10:57:59PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 12:42:45PM +1000, Kai Hendry wrote:
> > > Package: feh
> > > Version: 1.3.2-1
> > > Severity: grave
> > > Justification: renders package unusable
84 matches
Mail list logo
