severity 310884 serious
thanks
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 11:54:46AM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote:
> severity 310884 important
> thanks
>
> Hi,
> As terry said, I couldn't find any problem with pbuilder and sbuild
> (buildd utility).
> I think this bug may beclosed, but just do downgrade at now.
It's n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 310884 serious
Bug#310884: pike7.2: FTBFS: ../../precompile.sh: line 151: pike: command not
found
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrat
The patch is risky. After it's been applied, invoking
"/etc/init.d/slapd start" while slapd is running can (and most
probably will) result in data loss.
"db4.2_recover -e" will pick up new DB_CONFIG settings, so there's no
need to special-case it for updates.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
>> Third, part-property.c passed a pointer to an unitialized size_t-typed
>> variable to get_macro_name(), which was expecting only an int pointer.
>> Thus, the top 32-bits remained unitialized and on ia64 this caused a
>> crash when attempting to insert any part.
> this was fixed in 0.40.3
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 310903 + fixed
Bug#310903: libgal2.0-dev: .la files still refence libhowl.la.
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, D
tags 310903 patch
thanks
Hello,
I've prepared a 0-day NMU to get this bug fixed ASAP for the sarge release.
Of course, only a recompile is needed, so the change is very short. :)
Please find the patch attached.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
diff -u gal2-1.99.11/debian/changelo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 310903 patch
Bug#310903: libgal2.0-dev: .la files still refence libhowl.la.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
> Also, did you rebuild your initrd after upgrading ?
That's what I forgot. Sorry!
After rebuilding the initrd the system works perfect again.
Thanks for your help!
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 02:16:02AM +0200, Carsten Wolff wrote:
>
> Is there something special about the upgrade-path of your system? Is the
> package-version on that machine really 0.4-7, or did you run reportbug on
> another machine?
Hi!
The machine was upgraded from Debian stable to Debian t
> Oregano defines GNOME_DISABLE_DEPRECATED which has the effect that
> gnome_menu_item_new() does NOT get declared. As a result, the
> function gets implicitly defined to return an "int", which is a
> problem on 64-bit architectures since the pointer cannot fit in an
> int. In particular, this is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 305909 + fixed
Bug#305909: sary-ruby: FTBFS: *** No rule to make target `ruby.h', needed by
`builder.o'. Stop.
Tags were: sarge patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracki
Hello,
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The sary-ruby binaries in unstable are not suitable for sarge because they
> depend on a newer version of ruby. Would you please prepare a sary-ruby
> 1.1.0.1-1sarge1 upload to testing-proposed-updates fixing thi
Your message dated Thu, 26 May 2005 23:23:40 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Acknowledge the NMU
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
OK, here's the deal.
I missed the SQL injection vulnerability until I was applying the patch, by
which point it didn't seem to matter. However, this is not a huge risk since
the main piece of user-supplied data that is used in the SQL queries is the
username, and that gets passed through the sql-e
severity 310884 important
thanks
Hi,
As terry said, I couldn't find any problem with pbuilder and sbuild
(buildd utility).
I think this bug may beclosed, but just do downgrade at now.
Thanks,
--
Kenshi Muto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "uns
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 310884 important
Bug#310884: pike7.2: FTBFS: ../../precompile.sh: line 151: pike: command not
found
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> # others can...
> severity 310882 serious
Bug#310882: emacs21: FTBFS: fails to install during build.
Severity set to `serious'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please c
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 02:25:07AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > # create the locale:
> > mkdir -p debian/tmpdir/usr/lib/locale
> > localedef -i "en_US" -f "UTF-8" "debian/tmpdir/usr/lib/locale/en_US.UTF-8"
> > cannot read character map directory `/usr/share/i18n/charmaps': No such
> > file
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 09:13:20AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The new upload of kftgt 1.8-1 has prevented the fix for RC bug #308400
> > from reaching testing. Can someone please upload kftgt 1.6-2sarge1 to
> > testing-proposed-updates, so we can g
Hi Hidetaka (and Kenshi),
The sary-ruby binaries in unstable are not suitable for sarge because they
depend on a newer version of ruby. Would you please prepare a sary-ruby
1.1.0.1-1sarge1 upload to testing-proposed-updates fixing this bug ASAP, so
that it's not necessary to drop sary-ruby and pr
Package: oregano
Version: 0.40.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Oregano defines GNOME_DISABLE_DEPRECATED which has the effect that
gnome_menu_item_new() does NOT get declared. As a result, the
function gets implicitly defined to return an "int", which is a
problem on 64-bit architectures since
Your message dated Thu, 26 May 2005 21:17:09 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#307720: fixed in freeradius 1.0.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 26 May 2005 21:17:09 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#307720: fixed in freeradius 1.0.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 26 May 2005 21:17:09 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#307720: fixed in freeradius 1.0.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hello Torsten.
On Thu, 26 May 2005 16:53:17 +0200
you wrote:
>> +# Find out slapd db directories
>> +SLAPD_DBDIRS=`sed -ne 's/^directory[[:space:]]\+"*\([^"]\+\).*/\1/p' \
>> +"$SLAPD_CONF" `
>> +
TL> I'd rather gather this list at the time when it is needed. Apar
Package: llvm
Version: 1.4-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source
llvm fails to build from source on sparc and all other buildds,
duplicated on sparc pbuilder.
touch ./stamp/patch-stamp
#-- run the build script
./build.sh
make[1]: execvp: ./build.sh: Permission d
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 04:55:40PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
> Package: sbcl
> Version: 1:0.9.0.39-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid
> Justification: Fails to build from source
>
>
> sbcl fails to build from source on sparc, duplicated on a sparc
> pbuilder. It appears you are making assumptio
tag 310884 unreproducible
thanks
I'm unable to reproduce this bug on unstable with pike7.2 7.2.580-3
building in a pbuilder chroot.
Are you building these using pbuilder or something else? If something
else, could you provide the output of
dpkg-depcheck -b fakeroot debian/rules binary;
Also, t
Hi,
I don't know, what went wrong in your installation, but as you can see here,
there's no such "-zts" folder in the package anymore:
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_contents.pl?searchmode=filelist&word=php4-auth-pam&version=testing&arch=i386
Is there something special about the upgra
Your message dated Thu, 26 May 2005 20:02:30 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#309645: fixed in oregano 0.40.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 310884 unreproducible
Bug#310884: pike7.2: FTBFS: ../../precompile.sh: line 151: pike: command not
found
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 290329 + fixed
Bug#290329: initrd-tools: please default to modules=dep, at least on powerpc.
Tags were: patch d-i
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrato
Package: sbcl
Version: 1:0.9.0.39-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: Fails to build from source
sbcl fails to build from source on sparc, duplicated on a sparc
pbuilder. It appears you are making assumptions about the locales
installed on the building system.
dh_testdir
perl: warning
Your message dated Thu, 26 May 2005 19:32:41 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#310564: fixed in kernel-patch-badram 2.6.5.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 03:17:57PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> What a mess.
>
> Looks to me like the only real options for dealing with with bug for
> sarge are:
>
> - revert the powerpc change in debian/rules, downgrade bug as not RC
> or
> - re-upload initrd tools as an arch any package
Choosen
Package: smart
Version: 0.30.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source
smart fails to build on the sparc buildd when it is unable to copy a file
into /usr/share:
byte-compiling
/build/buildd/smart-0.30.2/debian/smartpm/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/smart/util/el
Your message dated Thu, 26 May 2005 19:45:59 -0400 (EDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Webmin-maintainers] Bug#310838: [CAN-2005-1177] erroneously
changes permissions and ownership of configuration files
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 310882 unreproducible
Bug#310882: emacs21: FTBFS: fails to install during build.
Tags were: confirmed
Tags added: unreproducible
> severity 310882 important
Bug#310882: emacs21: FTBFS: fails to install during build.
Severity set to `important'.
>
The build definitely fails outside the chroot. A full build log is
here:
http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/emacs21_21.4a-1.build-nochroot-log
and a complete list of installed packages is here:
http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/hardknott-packages
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
P
Your message dated Thu, 26 May 2005 19:02:26 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#310575: fixed in kernel-patch-relayfs 2.6.9-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
I've repeated the emacs build on powerpc, this time using an sbuild
chroot, rather than on the main system. It worked. The log is here:
http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/emacs21_21.4a-1.build-log
So there must be some sort of discrepancy between the live system and
the chroot, but both are up-to
Here's a partial patch:
--- emacs.orig/emacs21-21.4a/debian/rules 2005-05-26 21:37:38.118986232
+0100
+++ emacs.new/emacs21-21.4a/debian/rules2005-05-26 22:52:02.916233880
+0100
@@ -712,7 +712,7 @@
test -f debian/pkg-bin-common/usr/bin/emacs-*
rm debian/pkg-bin-comm
tag 310882 unreproducible
severity 310882 important
thanks
I just rebuilt this package (emacs21-21.4a) on i386 using pbuilder,
and the package built fine, so this is most likely local setup
dependent.
Downgrading and tagging unreproducible as appropriate.
Don Armstrong
--
Do not handicap your
tags 310882 + confirmed
thanks
Hi,
This bug is reproducible on powerpc (current unstable):
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/tmp/emacs.new/emacs21-21.4a/debian/build-x/lib-src'make[1]: Leaving
directory `/tmp/emacs.new/emacs21-21.4a/debian/build-x'
install -d debian/pkg-bin-common
install -d debian/
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 310882 + confirmed
Bug#310882: emacs21: FTBFS: fails to install during build.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
Package: libgal2.0-dev
Version: 1.99.11-1.1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is has 2 .la files which still mention the
libhowl.la file and libhowl was removed from main. You probably
picked that up by linking to something to used to be linked
against this and just rebuilding will probably fix
Your message dated Thu, 26 May 2005 16:02:47 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#310170: fixed in openduke 0.0.1alpha+20040408-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Hi,
I get the same test failure on "dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot".
bye,
Roland
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reportbug seems to have ignored the patch, so I'm sending it again.
--
"I'd rather listen to [Isaac] Newton than to [MicroSoft's] Mundie. He may
have been dead for almost three hundred years, but despite that he stinks
up the room less." --- (Linus Torvalds)
Saludos /\/\ /\ >< `/
diff -ru s
Tags 309645 +patch
thanks,
Package: oregano
Version: 0.40.0-3
Followup-For: Bug #309645
I'm attaching that fixes the problem (thanks to upstream).
--
" Documentation is like sex: when it is good, it is very, very good; and when
it is bad, it is better than nothing. " -- (Dick Brandon)
Saludos /
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Tags 309645 +patch
Bug#309645: oregano: Plot window freezes due to a libcairo bug
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: patch
> thanks,
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> reassign 292951 ddetect
Bug#292951: not detecting cdrom on iMac G5
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `ddetect'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please co
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - No rationalle was given for sweeping the sql injection vulnerbility
>under the rug as a minor hole.
This bug is unlikely to be exploitable because you have to get
authorized successfully by correctly escaped SQL requests before
running any of the unes
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 06:20:23AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Marius,
>
> On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 02:45:57PM +0200, Marius Mikucionis wrote:
> > strangely I still get the very same loop and message.
> > and message includes initrd-tools-0.1.80 no matter what version of
> > initrd-tools is
Package: pike7.2
Version: 7.2.580-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
make[3]: Entering directory
`/usr/src/build/pike7.2-7.2.580/build/linux-2.6.9-i686/modules/Kerberos'
../../precompile.sh precompile.pike
>"/usr/src/build/pike7.2-7.2.580/src/modu
Package: emacs21
Version: 21.4a-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
install -d debian/pkg-bin-common
install -d debian/pkg-bin-common/usr
mv debian/pkg-bin-common.tmp/usr/bin debian/pkg-bin-common/usr/
mv debian/pkg-bin-common.tmp/usr/lib debian/pkg-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> # fixed in Debian X Strike Force XFree86 repository; to view, run "svn diff
> -r 2269:2271 svn://necrotic.deadbeast.net/xfree86"
> tags 308783 + pending
Bug#308783: libxpm4: new s_p
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 310812 + fixed
Bug#310812: imagemagick: [CAN-2005-1739] infinite loop with crafted XWD files
Tags were: security patch
Bug#310690: xwd handling DoS
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debia
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> # Taking this, as I'm working on it now.
> owner 308783 Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bug#308783: libxpm4: new s_popen() function is insecure garbage
Owner changed from David
reopen 305909
tags 305909 + sarge
thanks
This is still affecting the version in sarge.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 305909
Bug#305909: sary-ruby: FTBFS: *** No rule to make target `ruby.h', needed by
`builder.o'. Stop.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> tags 305909 + sarge
Bug#305909: sary-ruby: FTBFS: *** No rule to make target `ruby.h', needed by
`b
severity 310637 important
stop
Since this problem doesn't break the system for the vast majority of people,
the severity level of important seems best here.
Cheers,
Christopher Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 310637 important
Bug#310637: kde hangs when home directory is over NFS
Severity set to `important'.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bu
Martin Pitt wrote:
> Package: webmin
> Version: 1.180-3
> Severity: critical
> Tags: security
>
> Hi!
>
> CAN-2005-1177 describes a bug in webmin that can cause the permissions
> and ownerships of configuration files to be changed when the file is
> modified. This is fixed in 1.200, see
>
> ht
Martin Pitt wrote:
> The changelog shows no trace that this is fixed:
>
> http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2005-0299
> http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/12318
>
> However, I did not actually check the code; if gforge is vulnerable,
> please coordinate with the security team.
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The new upload of kftgt 1.8-1 has prevented the fix for RC bug #308400
> from reaching testing. Can someone please upload kftgt 1.6-2sarge1 to
> testing-proposed-updates, so we can get this fix into sarge?
Ack, I'm sorry about that, I completely forgo
severity 310823 normal
tags 310823 unreproducible
thanks
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 11:03:59AM +0200, Jo?o Miguel Neves wrote:
> Subject: e2fsprogs: e2fsck gets a signal 11 when clearing a i_fsize
> Package: e2fsprogs
> Version: 1.37+1.38-WIP-0509-1
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the wh
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 310823 normal
Bug#310823: e2fsprogs: e2fsck gets a signal 11 when clearing a i_fsize
Severity set to `normal'.
> tags 310823 unreproducible
Bug#310823: e2fsprogs: e2fsck gets a signal 11 when clearing a i_fsize
Tags were: sid
Tags added: unrep
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package openldap2.2 slapd ldap-utils libldap-2.2-7
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libldap-2.2-7 ldap-utils slapd openldap2.2
> tags 255276 + pending
Bug#255276: slapd/slapcat hang in endless loops
Tags were: pending unreproducible
Bug#302992: slapd get
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package openldap2.2 slapd ldap-utils libldap-2.2-7
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libldap-2.2-7 ldap-utils slapd openldap2.2
> tags 255276 + pending
Bug#255276: slapd/slapcat hang in endless loops
Tags were: unreproducible
Bug#302992: slapd gets in end
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 307720 grave
Bug#307720: freeradius: Few possible security problems
Bug#310840: [CAN-2005-1454] SQL injection vulnerability in the radius_xlat
function
Bug#310841: freeradius: [CAN-2005-1455] buffer overflow
Severity set to `grave'.
> severit
Hi Eugene,
On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 11:26:03PM +0800, Eugene Konev wrote:
> The attached patch adds calling db4.2_recover to slapd.init on every
> slapd startup.
Thanks again for the patch. I am currently working to apply your
changes. A few remarks while I am working on it:
> diff -Nru openld
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 01:58:38PM +0100, Alex Owen wrote:
>
> Just thinking some more about my proposed fix... using
> dpkg-architecture would mean "Require: dpkg-dev" but the idea could
> perhaps be reworked to use "uname -m" which is in coreutils which is:
>
> $ apt-cache show coreutils
> Pack
reopen 308400
tags 308400 sarge
thanks
Hi Russ, Ben,
The new upload of kftgt 1.8-1 has prevented the fix for RC bug #308400 from
reaching testing. Can someone please upload kftgt 1.6-2sarge1 to
testing-proposed-updates, so we can get this fix into sarge?
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern pr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 308400
Bug#308400: missing dependency for update-inetd
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> tags 308400 sarge
Bug#308400: missing dependency for update-inetd
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Pleas
Your message dated Thu, 26 May 2005 15:42:24 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#310853: apt-build
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Hi Marius,
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 02:45:57PM +0200, Marius Mikucionis wrote:
> strangely I still get the very same loop and message.
> and message includes initrd-tools-0.1.80 no matter what version of
> initrd-tools is installed.
> shall I also reinstall kernel-image-2.6.11 with initrd-tools-0
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 310841 minor
Bug#310841: freeradius: [CAN-2005-1455] buffer overflow
Severity set to `minor'.
> tags 310841 +fixed-upstream
Bug#310841: freeradius: [CAN-2005-1455] buffer overflow
Tags were: security
Tags added: fixed-upstream
> merge 307720
severity 310840 minor
tags 310840 +fixed-upstream
merge 307720 310840
thanks
Thanks for the reports. This problem was already discussed under
bug #307720. There is nothing else to do except merging the
reports.
--
Nicolas Baradakis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Michael Setzer wrote:
> Patrick,
>
> I'm not pretty sure if I got you right.
>
> After upgrading lvm-common to 1.5.19 the error is still there and my system
> is still unbootable (same error message as described already).
>
> What I've done now to upgrade to 1.5.19 is:
>
> - booted with the Deb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 310840 minor
Bug#310840: [CAN-2005-1454] SQL injection vulnerability in the radius_xlat
function
Severity set to `minor'.
> tags 310840 +fixed-upstream
Bug#310840: [CAN-2005-1454] SQL injection vulnerability in the radius_xlat
function
Tags
Package: initrd-tools
Version: 0.1.81
Followup-For: Bug #310420
it works!
thanks
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686
Locale: LAN
Package: initrd-tools
Version: 0.1.79
Followup-For: Bug #310420
strangely I still get the very same loop and message.
and message includes initrd-tools-0.1.80 no matter what version of
initrd-tools is installed.
shall I also reinstall kernel-image-2.6.11 with initrd-tools-0.1.81 ?
simple reboot
Just thinking some more about my proposed fix... using
dpkg-architecture would mean "Require: dpkg-dev" but the idea could
perhaps be reworked to use "uname -m" which is in coreutils which is:
$ apt-cache show coreutils
Package: coreutils
Essential: yes
Priority: required
Section: base
.
Not
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> #
> tags 292951 sarge-ignore
Bug#292951: not detecting cdrom on iMac G5
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge-ignore
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
Package: apt-build
Version: 0.12.5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
apt-build needs for proper fetching of at least index-file curl -- but
there's no dependency! trying
# apt-build install cupsys
fails with
sh: policy: command not found
sh: policy: command not found
Unabl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 292951 serious
Bug#292951: not detecting cdrom on iMac G5
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
tag 310170 + patch
tag 310170 + help
thanks
Hi!
Attached is a patch that should fix #310170. It solves the build
trouble, but I am unable to test the resulting program as I have no duke
data files.
If anyone could verify that the resulting packages work, I'd be happy to
NMU.
--
Kind regards,
+
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 310170 + patch
Bug#310170: openduke FTBFS, requires autoconf 2.50
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> tag 310170 + help
Bug#310170: openduke FTBFS, requires autoconf 2.50
Tags were: patch
Tags added: help
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
I chatted to rml about this at LCA - it ought to only affect the Suse
codepath, so I'm not too worried about it. I'll take another look to
make sure that we're not affected.
--
Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Package: freeradius
Version: 1.0.2-3
Severity: grave
Tags: security
freeradius seems to be vulnerable against a buffer overflow:
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2005-1455
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/13541
Thanks in advance for checking,
Martin
--
Martin Pitt
Package: freeradius
Version: 1.0.2-3
Severity: grave
Tags: security
freeradius seems to be vulnerable against an SQL injection:
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2005-1454
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/13540
Thanks in advance for checking,
Martin
--
Martin Pitt
Your message dated Thu, 26 May 2005 03:37:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#310822: php4-auth-pam: pam_auth.so compiled against wrong
PHP version?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 310823 sid
Bug#310823: e2fsprogs: e2fsck gets a signal 11 when clearing a i_fsize
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please con
Package: webmin
Version: 1.180-3
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Hi!
CAN-2005-1177 describes a bug in webmin that can cause the permissions
and ownerships of configuration files to be changed when the file is
modified. This is fixed in 1.200, see
http://www.webmin.com/changes.html
Can you p
Package: netapplet
Severity: critical
Tags: security, patch
Hi Matthew!
The changelog does not show any sign that
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2005-1040
is fixed. The CAN entry is pretty empty (just points at the SuSE
security announcement), but they posted a patch to ve
Hi Jeroen,
pleased to meet you!
Sorry for keeping you waiting with this, but I'm still in the process of
sorting this out with our lawyers. I'll let you know as soon as possible.
/Stefan
Jeroen van Wolffelaar -- Debian FTP wrote:
Hi Stefan, hi all,
Let me first introduce myself, I'm membe
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 308997 pending
Bug#308997: file conflict with remembrance-agent from woody
Tags were: sarge patch
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 11:39:26AM +0200, Patrick Cornelißen wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez schrieb:
>
> > pacakge releaseforge
> typo? :-)
>
I am this close -> <- from swapping the `a' and `k' keys on my keyboard
:-)
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
signature
pacakge releaseforge
tags 310816 + upstream
forwarded 310816 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
severity 310816 important
thanks
Cornelis,
Thanks for the bug report. I have already been communicating with the
upstream author about the ptential problems (like this) that might arise
from writing config files on t
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
