Hi!
I have exactly the same problem on my 2 servers. After upgrading to
2.2.3a-14.2 samba crashes once a day.
I have just downgraded to 2.2.3a-14.1, because it is a production
envirement.
--
Udv,
Nandor
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 302517
Bug#302517: dosfstools: fsck.vfat corrupts filesystems
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
On Sun, 2005-03-04 at 22:56 +0200, Remco Seesink wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I prepared a new version of php4-interbase. Gregorz, are you in a
> position to sponsor an upload?
I am afraid not. My new GPG key, singed by two DDs, is waiting since
a few weeks for inclusion into the official keyring :-(
diff -ur origi/webcalendar-0.9.45/debian/changelog
webcalendar-0.9.45/debian/changelog
--- origi/webcalendar-0.9.45/debian/changelog 2005-04-04 00:46:06.405458528
-0400
+++ webcalendar-0.9.45/debian/changelog 2005-04-04 00:54:30.071889592 -0400
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+webcalendar (0.9.45-4) unstable;
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 296935 patch
Bug#296935: Setting up of webcalendar fails
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need ass
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 298475 patch
Bug#298475: The DB password should be of debconf type "password", not "string"
Tags were: security
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 297781 pending
Bug#297781: openafs: OpenAFS 1.3.79 release, supposedly fixes many Linux 2.6
bugs, 1.3.75 doesn't compile under 2.6.11
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 283488 pending
Bug#283488: FTBFS in experimental
Tags were: e
Your message dated Mon, 04 Apr 2005 12:56:10 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line done with NMU
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re
Your message dated Mon, 04 Apr 2005 12:56:10 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line done with NMU
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re
Your message dated Mon, 04 Apr 2005 12:56:10 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line done with NMU
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re
Your message dated Mon, 04 Apr 2005 12:56:10 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line done with NMU
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re
tag 302704 +pending
thanks
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 02:54:52PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Package: kernel-source-2.4.27
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
>
> CAN-2005-0750: Insufficient range checking in af_bluetooth allows local root
> exploit.
>
> T
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 302704 +pending
Bug#302704: CAN-2005-0750: Possible local root exploit through insufficient
range checking in af_bluetooth
Tags were: patch security
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Thank you for giving us a zeroconf implementation.
I read the bug report about the (C) issue but found it less
important than the "upstream" url pointing to a non existant
page. I was willing to learn more about this zeroconf
implementation and was a bit at lost.
Should i read progsoc mailing list
thanks for taking care of this problem. I have not understood if
a fix was found but i can confirm a bug it produce.
I had this error (my proxy was unable to start):
/var/log/squid/cache.log
2005/03/31 16:42:20| commBind: Cannot bind socket FD 13 to
*:3128: (98) Address already in use FATAL: Cann
Hi,
> links-ssl package was *removed* from Debian in june, 2004.
Nope, links-ssl is still part of woody:
http://packages.debian.org/stable/non-US/links-ssl
> links and elinks (and links2 by the way) does not show any signs
> of this bug.
You are sure that you were looking at package version 0.
Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 21:02:35 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#297652: fixed in abiword 2.2.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 21:03:15 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#302634: fixed in squid 2.5.9-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 12:18:14AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> Ok. In the meantime, I think not being able to create new filesystems is a
> grave bug that makes this version of the package unreleasable given that it
> would completely break the installer on ia64 if it reached sarge. Tagged
Your message dated Mon, 4 Apr 2005 02:52:45 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#302421: not valid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 22:08:34 +0100
Esteban Manchado Velázquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello:
>
>Does upstream know this?
links-ssl was removed from Debian since Mon, 21 Jun 2004.
>Is anyone working on this bug?
Not likely.
Peter
ps: Neither links nor elinks seem to have this "b
tag 302914 patch
thanks
this patch i sent to 299498 fixes the build against the new
valgrind api. it includes a new configure.in file and a missing
build-depends on pkg-config.
cheers, piem
diff -u callgrind-0.9.10/debian/changelog callgrind-0.9.10/debian/changelog
--- callgrind-0.9.10/debian/cha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 302914 patch
Bug#302914: callgrind: FTBFS: vg_skin.h unreachable
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debia
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> severity 302938 normal
Bug#302938: libjpeg-progs: "jpegtran -rotate" algorithm is wrong, puts image
blocks in the wrong place in the output picture
Severity set to `normal'.
>
End o
Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 20:17:07 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298963: fixed in caudium 2:1.2.35.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 302903 sid
Bug#302903: libtonezone1 package is empty
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistanc
reassign 302995 dpkg
retitle 302995 dpkg: the alternatives mechanism should be more robust
thanks
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005, Blars Blarson wrote:
> Package: gettext
> Version: 0.14.3-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid
> Justification: fails to build from source
>
> gettext failed to build from source on
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 302995 dpkg
Bug#302995: gettext: ftbfs [sparc] `debian/tmp/usr/share/gettext/libintl.jar':
No such file or directory
Bug reassigned from package `gettext' to `dpkg'.
> retitle 302995 dpkg: the alternatives mechanism should be more robust
Bug#
Version: 1.1.3-7
Sarge system
Yes, I encountered this on a system that still had some fonts in a
/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/WordPerfect/
directory. (Not Debian's fault...)
Got rid of those and OpenOffice.org is happy to run again.
-Maitland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a s
Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 19:47:06 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#302871: fixed in d-shlibs 0.25
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: gettext
Version: 0.14.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source
gettext failed to build from source on the sparc buildd, however it
built fine on my sparc pbuilder. The buildd log lacks some things
that are in the pbuilder log "config.status: creating
intl
Your message dated Mon, 4 Apr 2005 08:36:12 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in alioth repository
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> reassign 302871 d-shlibs
Bug#302871: libshout: FTBFS: d-shlibmove reports problem with libogg0-dev
Warning: Unknown package 'dshlibs'
Bug reassigned from package `dshlibs' to `d-shlib
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> reassign 302871 dshlibs
Bug#302871: libshout: FTBFS: d-shlibmove reports problem with libogg0-dev
Warning: Unknown package 'd-shlibmove'
Warning: Unknown package 'dshlibs'
Bug reassig
I should've included an explanation with the patch - it is correct that
the pointer is being truncated. This is because the compiler uses a
default return type of int when it doesn't know the return type.
This is a general 64 bit issue - its not an ia64 specific issue, fwiw.
--
dann frazier <[EM
Package: python-slides
Version: 1.0.1-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dependency on python2.3-slides disappeared.
--
Michał Politowski
Talking has been known to lead to communication if practised carelessly.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 01:39:24PM -0700, Robert Fleming wrote:
> Package: libjpeg-progs
> Version: 6b-10
> Severity: grave
> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
[[This is absolutly incorrect: there is no data loss at all:
if you rotate the image back, you get exactly the original jpeg fil
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package openldap2.2 slapd ldap-utils libldap-2.2-7
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libldap-2.2-7 ldap-utils slapd openldap2.2
> tags 300851 + pending
Bug#300851: libdb version check
Tags were: experimental
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping
Hello:
Does upstream know this? Is there any official patch or we have to write
one ourselves?
Is anyone working on this bug?
--
Esteban Manchado Velázquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.foton.es
EuropeSwPatentFree - http://EuropeSwPatentFree.hispalinux.es
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 01:08:36PM -0700, Aaron Johnson wrote:
>
> Package: kuser
> Version: 4:3.4.0-0pre1
> Severity: critical
> Tags: experimental
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
>
> 1. Do a fresh net install of Debian Sarge RC3
> 2. Upgrade to Unstable
> 3. Add pkg-kde.alioth.debian
Hello all,
I prepared a new version of php4-interbase. Gregorz, are you in a
position to sponsor an upload?
People on pkg-firebird-general might want to rush in for the fun early
to help testing.
Here is the changelog.
* New upstream release
* Acknowledging NMU. (Closes: #294000)
* Bum
Package: libjpeg-progs
Version: 6b-10
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
See http://home.comcast.net/~fleminra/jpegtran-bug/
for example input and ouput. jpegtran incorrectly moves the bottom row of
blocks to the top of the image. This bug is also present in the JPEG
so
With respect to my last comment (of 2005-03-05): I completely botched
that upload. Mercifully, it was caught by our alert FTP team and
rejected.
I have just made a new upload (tested a bit more) :-/
-Steve
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
Package: kuser
Version: 4:3.4.0-0pre1
Severity: critical
Tags: experimental
Justification: breaks unrelated software
1. Do a fresh net install of Debian Sarge RC3
2. Upgrade to Unstable
3. Add pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org to sources.list
4. Apt-get install x-window-system kde kdm cupsys sane
5. Log in
Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 15:50:45 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#302833: fixed in zaptel 1:1.0.7-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 15:50:19 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#302447: fixed in webmin-virtual-server 2.50-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 15:50:45 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#302903: fixed in zaptel 1:1.0.7-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 15:50:45 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#302847: fixed in zaptel 1:1.0.7-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Package: callgrind
Version: 0.9.10-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
building the package callgrind in a clean sid build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
=
[...]
dh_testdir
# Add here commands to configure the package.
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 05:21:41PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
> For the time being I think that the cleanest thing to do is to add a
> zeroconf method to the inet and inet6 address families. Initially the
Note that zeroconf should not be used with IPv6 - that includes its own
link local allocatio
tags 300520 + patch
thanks
For what it's worth, the attached patch will make portslave build from
source again. It seems harmless, but since the problem only affects sid
and Russell has been active recently with the package, I won't NMU for
now.
I hope this has been helpful. Happy hacking.
diff
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 300520 + patch
Bug#300520: portslave: FTBFS: ppp.h moved to /usr/include/pppd/
Tags were: sid patch
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 302347 + fixed
Bug#302347: libneedle-ruby: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'ruby1.8'
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
Hi Gerald,
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 05:36:59PM +0200, Gerald Hochegger wrote:
> I've already upgraded our production servers because I was
> hoping to get rid of the database corruption problems.
>
> Here are my results so far:
>
> * ldapi:/// is not working after the upgrade
> Use
> --localst
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 302345 + fixed
Bug#302345: libneedle-extras-ruby: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'ruby1.8'
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 302351 + fixed
Bug#302351: libnet-sftp-ruby: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'ruby1.8'
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 302349 + fixed
Bug#302349: libnet-ssh-ruby: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'ruby1.8'
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> This looks like a missing build dependency or something,
> but I have no idea on what package since nothing in debian
> seems to have them.
It's missing a build-dep on libcegui-mk2-dev, which should hit the archive with
the
next dinstall run.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To
severity 302827 serious
thanks
Hi all,
Matthijs Mohlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: tetex-bin
> Version: 2.0.2-27
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> tetex-bin could not be installed on several architectures including:
> mipsel, s390, alpha and powerpc. See for example this buildd log:
> h
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 302827 serious
Bug#302827: tetex-bin: fails to install on several architectures
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Package: libtonezone1
Version: 1:1.0.7-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The libtonezone1 package, and all other packages build from zaptel, are
empty: they don't contain any executables/libraries.
If you use dh_install to build your packages, you need to rename the
*.file
Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 13:02:38 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301513: fixed in sslwrap 2.0.6-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 13:02:38 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#302795: fixed in sslwrap 2.0.6-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 302827 critical
Bug#302827: tetex-bin: fails to install on several architectures
Severity set to `critical'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 12:26:34 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#294079: fixed in python-kde3 3.11.3-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Package: ogre
Version: 1.0.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../../OgreMain/include -I../../
../../Samples/Common/CEGUIRenderer/include -DGCC_3_1 -DEXT_HASH -g -O2 -MT Ogre
CEGUIRenderer.lo -MD -MP -M
Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 12:02:40 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#302874: fixed in nstx 1.1-beta6-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Hi Torsten,
thanks for your 2.2 packages.
I've already upgraded our production servers because I was
hoping to get rid of the database corruption problems.
Here are my results so far:
* ldapi:/// is not working after the upgrade
Use
--localstatedir=/var (instead of /var/run)
in debian/confi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 300460 + fixed
Bug#300460: htmldoc: segfault when generating ps or pdf
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian B
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 05:03:37PM +0200, Jean-Michel Kelbert wrote:
> Le 17/03/05 à 02:08 Justin Pryzby ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) écrivait :
> > I can confirm that this problem exists with a fresh install.
> > Justin
>
> Could you tell me it it's allready present in the new package ?
The new package (1
Le 17/03/05 à 02:08 Justin Pryzby ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) écrivait :
> I can confirm that this problem exists with a fresh install.
> Justin
Could you tell me it it's allready present in the new package ?
In fact this should'nt happen, since there is the following test in the
preinst script :
test -
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 04:55:25PM +0200, Elrond wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 04:46:33PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 04:27:33PM +0200, Elrond wrote:
> > >
> > > Check bug #298532.
> >
> > Oh, I didn't notice that one. I should probably have reopened
> > that one and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 302684 serious
Bug#302684: Limit families/methods for which zeroconf is called?
Severity set to `serious'.
> tags 302684 sid
Bug#302684: Limit families/methods for which zeroconf is called?
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
> thanks
Sto
Hi,
On Sat, 2005-04-02 at 01:19 +0200, Christoph Wegscheider wrote:
> Please check the timestamps after unpacking it, I believe that there is
> a bug somewhere in your system concerning timestamps.
The problem with this kind of timestamp skew is that on some systems
(I'm using the Debian kernel 2
Package: geda-gschem
Version: 20040111-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sarge
Hi,
Your package is failing to build in sarge. This seems to have
been fixed in the 20050313-1 version which is waiting on arm.
This bug can probably be closed once that version reaches
testing.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 04:27:33PM +0200, Elrond wrote:
>
> Check bug #298532.
Oh, I didn't notice that one. I should probably have reopened
that one and tagged it sarge instead.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PRO
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 04:46:33PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 04:27:33PM +0200, Elrond wrote:
> >
> > Check bug #298532.
>
> Oh, I didn't notice that one. I should probably have reopened
> that one and tagged it sarge instead.
Will you close this bug, when arts has prop
Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 09:32:14 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#291559: fixed in capi4hylafax 1:01.02.03-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 03:52:50PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Package: qemu
> Version: 0.6.1-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sarge
Check bug #298532.
Elrond
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: nstx
Version: 1.1-beta6-1
Severity: grave
nstxd in sid is broken with any packets longer than 90 bytes. Fix it,
you fool.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-
Package: d-shlibmove
Version: 2.1-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
building the package libshout in a clean sid build environment
(with pbuilder :-) on i386 results in:
=
[...]
if test -x /usr/bin/dh_installlogcheck; then dh_installl
Package: octave-epstk
Version: 2.0.2-4
Severity: serious
Tags: sarge
Hi,
Your package currently can't be build in sarge because it has a
build dependency on octave2.1-headers (>= 2.1.65). Once such a
version reaches testing this bug can be closed.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
Package: libgts-dev
Version: 0.7.3-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
When building the gerris package is sarge I'm getting the
following error:
checking for gts-config... /usr/bin/gts-config
checking for GTS - version >= 0.7.1... no
*** Could not run GTS test program, checking why...
*** The test program f
Package: r-noncran-lindsey
Version: 1.0.20041008-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is build dependency on both libncurses5-dev and
libncurses4-dev. Those conflict with each other so you can only
install 1 of them.
I suggest you remove the libncurses4-dev build dependency since
other things i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 294079 - fixed
Bug#294079: python-kde3 is not buildable on kdelibs4 = 3.3.2
Tags were: pending fixed
Tags removed: fixed
> tags 294076 - fixed
Bug#294076: python-kde3 doesn't create python-kde3-dev with the sip files
Tags were: pending fixed
Tags
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 265823 serious
Bug#265823: FTBFS (alpha): implicit declaration of function `_FPU_SETCW'
Severity set to `serious'.
> tags 265823 + sid
Bug#265823: FTBFS (alpha): implicit declaration of function `_FPU_SETCW'
There were no tags set.
Tags added:
Package: qemu
Version: 0.6.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sarge
When building qemu is sarge I get the following error:
gcc -static -Wl,-T,/usr/src/qemu-0.6.1/./i386-vl.ld -o qemu-fast vl.o osdep.o
block.o readline.o monitor.o pci.o console.o block-cow.o block-qcow.o aes.o
block-vmdk.o block-cloop.
Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 09:32:15 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301994: fixed in capi4hylafax 1:01.02.03-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03-04-2005 14:11, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 05:41:06PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
>>Hi Robert,
>>
>>There are seven new RC bugs in the BTS today about packages in testing that
>>have a build-dependency on the newest version
Attached are two patches to fix this bug backported from 1.8.24.
The first one is a minimal patch which just corrects the segfault but
doesn't get the images to display properly in the PDF. The second is
more comprehensive (and includes the first) and makes PNGs appear
properly in the output.
Mar
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 300460 +patch
Bug#300460: htmldoc: segfault when generating ps or pdf
Tags were: patch
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 08:17:03 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#302517: fixed in dosfstools 2.11-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 08:17:03 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300126: fixed in dosfstools 2.11-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 08:17:03 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300126: fixed in dosfstools 2.11-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 05:41:06PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> There are seven new RC bugs in the BTS today about packages in testing that
> have a build-dependency on the newest version of type-handling. That
> version of type-handling is being held out of sarge because of less
Hi Artur,
I'm happy to sponsor this upload for you, but I'm puzzled why you numbered
this upload -10a instead of -11. Can I change that in the changelog and
upload?
Note that -10a is also a lower version than -10.1, which is the version
number that would be used by someone NMUing based on -10 --
Package: python-4suite-doc
Version: 0.99cvs20041008-5
Followup-For: Bug #301566
A second look at the package reveals that there is no html documentation in
the package at all, only a few text files and a lot of regression tests.
I respectfully suggest adding the docs or simply removing the packag
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 04:37:41PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Robert Millan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050329 16:35]:
> > On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 08:32:48PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > Package: freebsd5-buildutils
> > > Version: 5.3+2-2
> > > Severity: serious
> > > Tags: sarge
> > >
> > >
> >
Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 07:47:32 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#302573: fixed in cnews cr.g7-38
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 07:47:16 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#302251: fixed in bookmarkbridge 0.72-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
