Hi,
Samuel Wolf wrote (11 Feb 2013 17:52:53 GMT) :
> Any news to unblock package cairo/1.12.2-3 for wheezy?
It's been unblocked already, but nonetheless had to wait the customary
10 days before it migrates: http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/cairo.html
Cheers!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
ystem must itself be
running systemd in order to successfully build a Debian Live system
that uses systemd?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSU
egular upload to sid, I think a t-p-u upload
is a bit different and should document it details every change it
brings in).
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
:1.2.4.1-9
ii ssh-askpass-gnome [ssh-askpass] 1:6.0p1-3
ii virt-viewer 0.5.3-1
-- no debconf information
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
- libglib-object-introspection-perl 0.014-1
- libcairo-perl 1.103-1
- libgtk3-perl 0.008-1
- libpango-perl 1.224-1
I'm doing the same on my side, but given the segfault takes quite some
time to happen here, it would be super-awesome if you'd participate to
the debugging too
else it's no big deal.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of &quo
o it's critical for us to have live-boot
*always* obey live-media=removable.
I've not looked at the details of the proposed patches, so I may be
totally wrong about what the exact proposed behaviour would change for
us, though.
[1] https://tails.boum.org/
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| G
Hi,
Paul Wise wrote (19 Feb 2013 03:57:54 GMT) :
>> - libglib-perl 3:1.280-1
> Crashed.
Same here.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UN
Hi,
Daniel Baumann wrote (19 Feb 2013 13:21:29 GMT) :
> On 02/19/2013 01:28 PM, Ronny Standtke wrote:
>> How about a priority list, e.g.
>> "live-media=removable-usb,removable,any"
> sounds good.
Looks good to me too :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
wit
t doesn't seem worth a freeze exception) and
+ the changes/* file removed.
+
+ -- intrigeri Sat, 02 Feb 2013 17:02:01 +0100
+
vidalia (0.2.20-1) unstable; urgency=low
[ Ulises Vitulli ]
diff -Nru vidalia-0.2.20/debian/patches/Fix-wrong-uptime-bandwidth-in-relay-list.patch vidalia-
e output when run with --debug, look
for "libirc.so is not loadable" in particular:
(12:52:17) prefs: Reading /home/intrigeri/.purple/prefs.xml
(12:52:17) prefs: Finished reading /home/intrigeri/.purple/prefs.xml
(12:52:17) prefs: purple_prefs_get_path: Unknown pref /pidgin/browser
> JRuby 1.7.0 got release a few days ago:
> http://jruby.org/2012/10/22/jruby-1-7-0
> Would it be an idea to focus on this version instead of 1.6 ?
Ping?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb
Hi,
adrelanos wrote (27 Feb 2013 16:32:36 GMT) :
> Why not just add it to /etc/grub.d/?
What grub.d/ facility allows to modify config snippets generated by
another grub.d/ script??
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
|
of my knowledge nobody
willing and able to help has showed up yet.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...
fferently.
Please have a look at how the grub.d thing works before going on with
this discussion, else we're wasting everyone's time.
I think that my question still stands:
What grub.d/ facility allows to modify config snippets generated by
another grub.d/ script??
Cheers,
--
intr
intrigeri wrote (27 Feb 2013 17:18:47 GMT) :
> Maybe have a look at CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR_* Linux config on
> both distros?
And/or CONFIG_DEFAULT_SECURITY_APPARMOR.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
intrigeri wrote (27 Feb 2013 17:26:37 GMT) :
> I think that my question still stands:
> What grub.d/ facility allows to modify config snippets generated by
> another grub.d/ script??
Actually, I was thinking about it while walking, and I think it mostly
depends on whether a grub.d
dy has noticed for years that it might be an issue in some corner
case... but well, if you provide a patch, then the wording can be
a bit different ;)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.o
ackage.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
Index: debian/config/config
===
--- debian/config/config (re
or extra safety, we may want to wait for 1:1.59-1+2013c to migrate to
testing first, so that potential regressions caused by changes in lib/
are spotted.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanar
#x27;s syntax highlighting is confused
> by it too, but it's valid form).
I cannot reproduce this issue with the attached files with poedit
1.5.4-1. Accordingly marking as fixed in this version. I'll let the
package maintainers confirm and close this bug as they see fit.
Ch
t; If there is no more information, i'll soon close the bug.
Six months later, I'm closing this bug.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
ebian stable.
I'm sorry.
However, someone might want to maintain a backport of poedit 1.5.4-1
and later in wheezy-backports.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intriger
story not
keeping the absolute path, by the way?
(On my system, this is merely a display glitch, and does not prevent me
from re-opening a file I've just closed, as long as poedit is kept
running in the meantime.)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri
libglib-object-introspection-perl 0.014-1, and I've yet to see
parcimonie-applet crash. Paul, what about you?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUB
Hi Ansgar,
> I would like to update libquvi-scripts in wheezy to 0.4.11-2
> (identical to -1 already in experimental).
Is this unblock request still up-to-date, now that experimental has
0.4.12-1? (I mean, I was going to install the version in experimental
to run it and report back how I was happ
esired,
shouldn't this be set to RC severity and fixed in Wheezy too?
This change has been in Ubuntu Precise since 10 months, and in
unstable since October, without obvious signs of regressions that
I could spot, so IMHO it looks safe enough for a t-p-u
pre-approval request.
What do you think?
uly, I recommend the release
team rejects this unblock request.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.d
equest, and the maintainer uses backports after
the release as they see fit to provide packages for stable users.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBS
4.00 that fixes XFS.
OK. Do you ACK Salvatore's proposed t-p-u debdiff?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ.
Hi Georges,
intrigeri wrote (28 Jan 2013 04:08:31 GMT) :
> Hence, I suggest you propose a tentative debdiff of 4.03a-7+deb7u1 for
> t-p-u that would fix the RC bugs only (#687947 at least), or closing
> this bug and maintaining wims through wheezy-backports until Jessie is
> out
o push on it at
> this point.
Understood.
So, I recommend the release team closes this unblock request.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (12 Dec 2012 00:51:44 GMT) :
> Adam D. Barratt wrote (12 Nov 2012 17:13:53 GMT) :
>> Why is multi-arch support for this particular library important, at this
>> stage of the freeze? Neither of its reverse-dependencies are currently
>> m-a tagged, nor so
Hi,
any news on this front?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Hi,
(Cc'ing all recent uploaders, in the hope that it helps finding an
acceptable solution.)
intrigeri wrote (26 Jan 2013 23:20:14 GMT) :
> This version is not in unstable, so it cannot be unblocked.
> If what you are asking for is a pre-upload approval instead of an
> unblock,
Julien's
concerns about the proposed patch.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
check it actually reaches debian-release@l.d.o.
Four months have passed without a reply from the requester,
so I recommend the release team closes this unblock request.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fi
ong and confused and 2.
adding some clarity to the mix probably would not hurt.)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist
have replied everything.)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "
for our freeze
in the first place. Thanks to time-based freezes, perhaps this can be
synchronized better for Jessie? :)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To
the RC bug.
Julien (Danjou), are you interested in preparing and testing such
a package, that the release team could then review and probably
pre-approve?
(Also Cc'ing Raphaƫl, who might be interested in doing this work if
Julien has no time to do so.)
Cheers,
--
intrig
or the noise.
Any update on this side?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
by #688966. Hopefully this will
help the release team make a decision :)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ.
x27;m not speaking for the
release team, but I doubt such an unblock will be granted if the
maintainer does not addresses the question asked by Julien Cristau
a while ago. I mean, sorry to be the not-nice one, but this unblock
request has a moreinfo tag for a reason..
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| G
Raphael Hertzog wrote (04 Mar 2013 13:51:36 GMT) :
> So let's answer that question:
Thank you :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
intrigeri wrote (04 Mar 2013 10:16:35 GMT) :
> In any case, it looks now clear that "this needs to be unblocked else
> php5-midgard2 will be broken by midgard2-core" is no valid reason, in
> itself, to grant the unblock requested by #688966. Hopefully this will
> help t
Hi again,
and sorry for the flood..
Piotr Pokora wrote (04 Mar 2013 09:15:53 GMT) :
> Exactly. There are no changes made to php5-midgard2 package, so it
> only requires rebuild against fixed[0] midgard2-core package.
OK, this confirms #692358 and #688966 are totally unrelated, then.
Thank you.
nly (and only) if midgard2-core[0] and php5-midgard2[1] are
> distributed together.
Why?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
he ML; and 2. replying to the bug
allows to track the whole discussion in a single place, rather than
spreading it out on various places. Fixing the Cc accordingly.)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer
Hi,
> Please unblock package libdatetime-timezone-perl 1.57-1+2013a.
[...]
> unblock libdatetime-timezone-perl/1.57-1+2013a
Thanks for your work.
I've reviewed the changes outside of lib/DateTime/TimeZone/ and they
look good to me. I recommend the release team to grant this
unblock request.
Che
esktop_upgrade_to_wheezy/
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "u
, to this unblock request, then please explain why, and
please provide a filtered diff. Thanks in advance!
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUB
course of action for Wheezy is,
but I'm a bit tempted to recommend C based on the information I have.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
T
Hi,
Niko Tyni wrote (06 Mar 2013 18:59:02 GMT) :
>* [SECURITY] CVE-2013-1667: fix a rehashing DoS opportunity
> against code that uses arbitrary user input as hash keys.
> (Closes: #702296)
Thanks for your work.
> unblock perl/5.14.2-19
FWIW, I've verified that the attached debdif
wd_*.png might be a bit more involved.
Felix, have you plans to try and fix this in a timeframe that's
suitable for Wheezy? Perhaps keepass2 has free replacement icons for
the problematic ones? Anyone interested to help Felix?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaff
Hi,
Niels Thykier wrote (06 Mar 2013 21:23:15 GMT) :
> On 2013-03-05 21:14, intrigeri wrote:
>> Moreover, we have a Jenkins job [0] that currently consistently
>> reproduces the bug (thanks Holger!), and will confirm as soon as this
>> is accepted in testing if it's
information to
make a better informed decision.
Thanks!
[1] http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To U
nformation:
pbuilder/nomirror:
pbuilder/mirrorsite: http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/
pbuilder/rewrite: false
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
the same as the patch Kees applied
when he uploaded a candidate package for this transition in
experimental last year.
The resulting libapache2-mod-apparmor package looks good (same files
list, seemingly sensible control differences). I haven't tested
it though.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
87139
[pid 2794] time(NULL) = 1369087139
[pid 2794] time(NULL) = 1369087139
[pid 2794] time(NULL) = 1369087139
[pid 2794] time(NULL) = 1369087139
[pid 2794] select(1, [], NULL, NULL, {0, 1}) = 0 (Timeout)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https:
might be able to help for the "upload at the right time"
part, but I don't plan to learn how to use/test the AppArmor changehat
Apache module any time soon, so this really should be done by
someone else.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrig
t removing redmine-plugin-markdown/unstable), then
the installation completes fine.
Perhaps this plugin or its packaging should be updated for Rails 3.x?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.or
s to works:
sudo -u www-data X_DEBIAN_SITEID="default" ruby script/rails server -e
production
... thus tagging patch.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrig
ifexec "/sbin/mdadm" "-Q" "--detail" '/dev/md?*'
> else
>catifexec "/bin/echo" "No RAID devide found as '/dev/md?*'"
> fi
Thanks. Something on this line has bee commited in upstream's Git
repository (comm
fixed 572495 0.9.7-1
thanks
Hi,
this is fixed in 0.9.7, that is released and now in sid.
BTW, the Git commit that fixed this bug upstream was 0a6abfc3cef.
Bye,
--
intrigeri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
atch example.dup.)
Bye,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @
https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr-fingerprint.asc
| Did you exchange a walk on part in the war
| for a lead role in the cage?
--
To UNSUB
n #535993, BTW).
I just made a test run of Lenny's duplicity, and no such thing as
/root/.cache/duplicity can be found.
Bye,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @
https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr-finge
e dir: /home/tim/.cache/duplicity/dfd6cdfea9f4dc13e6e57c08d55d2a93
We don't use this option yet (see #535993), so we should not have
this problem.
Are you running a custom backupninja install?
Bye,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
e request.
Bye,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @
https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr-fingerprint.asc
| So what?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (06 Mar 2010 14:54:57 GMT) :
> Before we apply such a patch upstream, this feature must be
> implemented as a opt-in option, as it greatly changes the dup
> handler behavior.
Now that I stand corrected wrt. the growing local cache issue, I agree
that --full-if-o
d, thanks a lot for this detailed bug report.
The solution you suggested initially has been implemented in
upstream's Git repository, in a slightly different way though: this
extra option is only appended to the command line when running
duplicity >=0.6.01. This is commit 1cd91839c.
Bye,
--
Hi,
Olivier Berger wrote (04 Mar 2010 17:41:44 GMT) :
> I may be wrong, but I think that unless #535996 is implemented, there's
> a problem here.
I agree. Let's fix #535996.
Bye,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
|
ooks similar, but it's much quicker so you'd be
> unlucky to interrupt in the regexp loop, but possible.
I fixed both in 1.8, tagged and released in my "upstream" Git repository:
git://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/perldoc-el.git
Bye,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key
rnatives/aptitude, which in turn points to
> /usr/bin/aptitude-curses.
Same here.
bye,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @
https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr-fingerprint.asc
| So what?
--
To UNSUBSCR
5.10.1-11 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
ii sensible-utils0.0.2 Utilities for sensible alternative
cupt recommends no packages.
Versions of packages cupt suggests:
pn libterm-readline-gnu-perl (no description available)
-- no debconf information
0.0.2 Utilities for sensible alternative
cupt recommends no packages.
Versions of packages cupt suggests:
pn libterm-readline-gnu-perl (no description available)
-- no debconf information
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote (28 Mar 2010 13:31:37 GMT) :
> Thanks for your report. I will produce a patch soon, would you like
> to test it before I do a new point release?
Sure.
bye,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR finge
tags 575700 + fixed-upstream
thanks
Hi,
Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote (28 Mar 2010 14:54:19 GMT) :
> Ok, then please clone sources (master branch) here [1] and build a Debian
> package out of it.
> [1] git://github.com/jackyf/cupt.git
Works for me.
Bye,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG ke
Package: cupt
Version: 1.5.8
Severity: normal
excerpt from cupt_vs_apt(5):
to explicitly disable proxy, set
'acquire[
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @
https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr-fingerprin
Hi,
Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote (28 Mar 2010 17:10:12 GMT) :
> Now I implemented it (see changelog of the master branch).
Tested, works for me, thanks!
Bye,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @
ht
appreciated, as usual.
Tested, works for me, thanks!
Bye,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @
https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr-fingerprint.asc
| Every now and then I get a little bit restless
| and I d
apt(5)):
>> acquire::http::
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @
https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr-fingerprint.asc
| Every now and then I get a little bit restless
| and I dream of something wild.
>From 0ebe
tags 574650 + fixed-upstream
thanks
Hi,
Peter S Galbraith wrote (05 Apr 2010 23:26:13 GMT) :
> Did your latest version fix the other reported bug?
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=574650
I just released 1.9 (signed tag in my Git repo.) which fixes this.
Bye,
--
int
+ mkdir -m 02710 "$TORPIDDIR"
chown debian-tor:debian-tor "$TORPIDDIR"
fi
... once this is done we can start thinking seriously about enabling
ControlSocket by default.
Bye,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/
eam issue #3 [0]; not marking as
forwarded, since upstream issue is about res_send() only (fixed in
441fb10e), although the other messages are mentioned at the end of the
discussion too.
[0] http://code.google.com/p/torsocks/issues/detail?id=3
Bye,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG ke
trying to use the ControlSocket; more
specifically, the second set of torrc lines documented in the
parcimonie(1p) manpage is the right one to use with Tor 0.2.1.x.
I improved the manpage in commit 5c72095 to clarify this.
Bye,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardn
t
> would be preferable to use the full fingerprint to reduce the
> likelihood of extraneous keys being downloaded and added to a user's
> keyring.
Full ack, thanks for reporting it.
Fixed in Git (commit 684b384).
Bye,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitc
intrigeri wrote (15 May 2010 11:37:46 GMT) :
> intrig...@boum.org wrote (25 Nov 2009 15:37:01 GMT) :
>> Please find, attached, the French translation of the srm(1) manpage.
> Is there anything I can do to help having this translated manpage
> packaged in time for Squee
7;ll see where things are at when the author releases a new version
with aforementioned changes, then. Any (even very rough) ETA for
Nautilus 3 in sid?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir
> But first, do you know if mat and/or rst2pdf have made modifications
> to their local copy?
mat only skips a few files from the original pdfrw.
rst2pdf seems to ship pdfrw from SVN (revision 136) unmodified.
Bye,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/int
able), but ended up
erroneously having them created by the dnscache-run package (which I
fail to make any sense of).
Daniel, I think we need more information from you.
Bye,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR
Hi Gerrit,
intrigeri wrote (Fri, 18 Jun 2010):
> The postinst script keeps telling me the IP address I entered is
> invalid, because the following line is buggy:
> GOOD=$(netstat -ie |grep -F " inet addr:$IP " || :)
> To fix it, I had to replace "addr" with
intrigeri wrote (25 Dec 2010 19:44:49 GMT) :
>> Those are actually different symptoms from the same bug that my patch
>> fixes.
> For the record the bugfix patch is attached to message #5 of bug
> #607997.
See updated and completed patch, attached.
Bye,
--
intrigeri
|
to ask my AM (Cc'd) to upload it to DELAYED/10 at the end of
the month. Feel free to tell me if you think we should do otherwise.
Thank you for maintaining barry in Debian.
Bye,
--
intrigeri
diff -u barry-0.15/debian/control barry-0.15/debian/control
--- barry-0.15/debian/control
+++
upstream
desires.
Cheers!
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
| The impossible just takes a bit longer.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.deb
Hi,
Yavor Doganov wrote (11 Oct 2011 20:35:53 GMT) :
> Axel Beckert wrote:
>> Maybe you forgot the Cc to debian-release@l.d.o in your mail...
> Hmm, it was intentional, I hesitated to CC release as I'm sure a
> release manager will comment sooner or later because it blocks the
> GNUstep transitio
this bug was only
partially fixed upstream.
Bye,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
| Every now and then I get a little bit restless
| and I dream of something wild.
Ping?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
| We're dreaming of something else.
| Something more clandestine, something happier.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
n (#629477) is irrelevant, isn't it?
Bye,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
| We're dreaming of something else.
| Something more clandestine, some
;m no DM nor DD yet. However, I already partly reviewed your package
and asked a few questions, unanswered as of today. See the
aforementioned email.
Bye,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.or
801 - 900 of 3773 matches
Mail list logo