Bug#977535: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977535: pkg-js-tools should create node_modules symlink in autopkgtest

Le 16/12/2020 à 08:17, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > Package: pkg-js-tools,node-d3-geo > Severity: important > > node-d3-geo autopkgtest is failing with > > Error: Cannot find module '@babel/register' > > https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/n/node-d3-geo/8873707/log.gz >

Bug#977535: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977535: pkg-js-tools should create node_modules symlink in autopkgtest

Le 16/12/2020 à 11:56, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > Control: clone -1 -2 > Control: reassign -2 pkg-js-tools > Control: retitle -2 use cp -rL for extcopies (needed for symlinks) > Control: reassign node-d3-geo,pkg-js-tools,node-tape > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 8:27 am, Xa

Bug#977535: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977535: Bug#977535: pkg-js-tools should create node_modules symlink in autopkgtest

Le 16/12/2020 à 12:05, Xavier a écrit : > Le 16/12/2020 à 11:56, Pirate Praveen a écrit : >> Control: clone -1 -2 >> Control: reassign -2 pkg-js-tools >> Control: retitle -2 use cp -rL for extcopies (needed for symlinks) >> Control: reassign node-d3-geo,pkg-js-tools,nod

Bug#977535: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977535: Bug#977535: Bug#977535: pkg-js-tools should create node_modules symlink in autopkgtest

Le 16/12/2020 à 12:38, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 12:15 pm, Xavier wrote: >> Could you try pkg-js-autopkgtest 0.9.55 (experimental + salsa) ? > > No, this did not work. I don't see any cp command in the logs. > > autopkgtest [17

Bug#977535: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977535: Bug#977535: Bug#977535: Bug#977535: pkg-js-tools should create node_modules symlink in autopkgtest

Le 16/12/2020 à 13:07, Xavier a écrit : > Le 16/12/2020 à 12:38, Pirate Praveen a écrit : >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 12:15 pm, Xavier wrote: >>> Could you try pkg-js-autopkgtest 0.9.55 (experimental + salsa) ? >> >> No, this did not wo

Bug#977535: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977535: Bug#977535: Bug#977535: pkg-js-tools should create node_modules symlink in autopkgtest

Le 16/12/2020 à 13:14, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 1:07 pm, Xavier wrote: >> I didn't add an "echo" but debian/nodejs/extcopies are really copied >> (verified). Add a `ls node_modules` in your debian/tests/pkg-js/test if >&g

Bug#977535: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977535: Bug#977535: Bug#977535: pkg-js-tools should create node_modules symlink in autopkgtest

Le 16/12/2020 à 13:14, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 1:07 pm, Xavier wrote: >> I didn't add an "echo" but debian/nodejs/extcopies are really copied >> (verified). Add a `ls node_modules` in your debian/tests/pkg-js/test if >&g

Bug#977535: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977535: Bug#977535: Bug#977535: pkg-js-tools should create node_modules symlink in autopkgtest

Control: reopen -1 Control: tags -1 + confirmed Le 16/12/2020 à 13:40, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 1:38 pm, Xavier wrote: >> Your test modules are not built: >> >> $ node -e 'require("./debian/tests/test_modules/topojson-client

Bug#977535: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977535: Bug#977535: Bug#977535: pkg-js-tools should create node_modules symlink in autopkgtest

Le 16/12/2020 à 13:59, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 1:55 pm, Xavier wrote: >> No, this fails with an sbuild, except with nocheck of course. > > It built fine for me as well as on the official buildd normally (without > enabling nocheck). >

Bug#977535: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977535: Bug#977535: Bug#977535: pkg-js-tools should create node_modules symlink in autopkgtest

Le 16/12/2020 à 14:39, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > > > On 2020, ഡിസംബർ 16 6:45:06 PM IST, Xavier wrote: >> import tape from "tape"; >> ^^ >> >> SyntaxError: Cannot use import statement outside a module > > We need .babelrc too. > > htt

Bug#977535: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977535: Bug#977535: Bug#977535: Bug#977535: pkg-js-tools should create node_modules symlink in autopkgtest

Le 16/12/2020 à 14:59, Xavier a écrit : > Le 16/12/2020 à 14:39, Pirate Praveen a écrit : >> >> >> On 2020, ഡിസംബർ 16 6:45:06 PM IST, Xavier wrote: >>> import tape from "tape"; >>> ^^ >>> >>> SyntaxError: Cannot use import

Bug#961111: add an option to specify build-only components in watch

Control: tags -1 + wontfix

Bug#958867: add an option to add-node-component to embed build only modules in debian/build_modules

Design proposition: $ add-node-component --test foo $ add-node-component --build bar will download compatible versions and push then in debian dir: -> debian/build_modules/bar -> debian/tests/test_module/foo

Bug#976440: pkg-js-tools: add a minimal test to check the dependencies in package.json does not differ by major versions

Le 17/12/2020 à 19:00, Xavier a écrit : > Hi, > > such test should not fail because it will creates a lot of > false-positive FTBFS. I can write a test that returns OK or SKIP but > then what is the benefit? > > Cheers, > Xavier For embedded components, see also https:/

Bug#976440: pkg-js-tools: add a minimal test to check the dependencies in package.json does not differ by major versions

Hi, such test should not fail because it will creates a lot of false-positive FTBFS. I can write a test that returns OK or SKIP but then what is the benefit? Cheers, Xavier

Bug#976440: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976440: pkg-js-tools: add a minimal test to check the dependencies in package.json does not differ by major versions

Control: reassign -1 lintian Le 17/12/2020 à 19:23, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Xavier (2020-12-17 19:00:00) >> such test should not fail because it will creates a lot of >> false-positive FTBFS. I can write a test that returns OK or SKIP but >> then what is th

Bug#977663: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977663: Possible rearrangement of binary packages

Le 18/12/2020 à 13:44, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > Package: node-babel7 > Version: 7.12.11+~cs150.141.84-1 > Severity: wishlist > > @babel/runtime and @babel/standalone is targetted at browsers and used > as runtime dependencies unlike the rest of babel (all others are used as > build dependencies)

Bug#977663: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977663: Possible rearrangement of binary packages

Le 18/12/2020 à 14:51, Xavier a écrit : > Le 18/12/2020 à 13:44, Pirate Praveen a écrit : >> Package: node-babel7 >> Version: 7.12.11+~cs150.141.84-1 >> Severity: wishlist >> >> @babel/runtime and @babel/standalone is targetted at browsers and used >> as

Bug#977677: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977677: FTBFS: dependency to node-babel-runtime >=7 isn't understood by deb tools

Le 18/12/2020 à 18:38, Xavier Guimard a écrit : > Package: node-regenerator-transform > Version: 0.14.5-2 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs > > Since 0.14.5-2, dependency to node-babel7 was replaced by a dependency to > node-babel-runtime (>= 7) which is provided by: >

Bug#977677: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977677: Bug#977677: FTBFS: dependency to node-babel-runtime >=7 isn't understood by deb tools

Le 18/12/2020 à 20:09, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Xavier (2020-12-18 18:45:30) >> Please launch autopkgtest before uploading such changes to avoid >> problems. > > Yes, I fully agree. > > I generally run autopkgtest at every build + compare with debdiff

Bug#977677: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977677: Bug#977677: Bug#977677: FTBFS: dependency to node-babel-runtime >=7 isn't understood by deb tools

Le 18/12/2020 à 21:37, Xavier a écrit : > Le 18/12/2020 à 20:09, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >> Quoting Xavier (2020-12-18 18:45:30) >>> Please launch autopkgtest before uploading such changes to avoid >>> problems. >> >> Yes, I fully agree. >>

Bug#977685: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977685: node-jest: build routines are too brittle: build failures go undetected

ee that this directory contains 4 very big .gif! So closing this bug, this is not a bug but an improvement of pkg-js-tools! Thanks to have looked at this. Cheers, Xavier

Bug#977685: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977685: node-jest: build routines are too brittle: build failures go undetected

Le 18/12/2020 à 23:16, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Xavier (2020-12-18 22:59:06) >> Le 18/12/2020 à 22:28, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >>> Source: node-jest >>> Version: 26.6.3+repack+~cs61.38.31-3 >>> Severity: serious >>> >>> By ac

Bug#977690: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977690: node-rollup-plugin-json: please embed additional rollup plugins

Le 18/12/2020 à 23:41, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Package: node-rollup-plugin-json > Version: 4.1.0+repack+~4.0.0-1 > Severity: wishlist > > I need these rollup plugins + dependencies not yet in Debian: > > rollup-plugin-cleanup > rollup-plugin-multi-entry > matched > js-cleanup > skip-rege

Bug#977742: Fwd: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977742: Build-Depends-Indep: dh-sequence-nodejs is unsupported

Control: tags -1 + wontfix Tagged as "wontfix" following Niels's recommendation Le 20/12/2020 à 09:51, Niels Thykier a écrit : > Xavier: >> Hi, >> >> could you help me here ? It seems that "add_command_option" is not >> usable for dh-sequence-n

Bug#977864: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977864: libjs-bootstrap4: Missing maintscript blocks upgrade

Le 22/12/2020 à 06:03, Xavier Guimard a écrit : > Package: libjs-bootstrap4 > Version: 4.5.2+dfsg1-3 > Severity: serious > > Version 4.5.2+dfsg1-2 transform /usr/share/javascript/bootstrap4 from > symlink to dir without any maintscript. This break updates. I enabled CI for t

Bug#977864: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977864: libjs-bootstrap4: Missing maintscript blocks upgrade

Le 22/12/2020 à 06:30, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Xavier Guimard (2020-12-22 06:03:43) >> Package: libjs-bootstrap4 >> Version: 4.5.2+dfsg1-3 >> Severity: serious >> >> Version 4.5.2+dfsg1-2 transform /usr/share/javascript/bootstrap4 from >> symli

Bug#977864: fixed in twitter-bootstrap4 4.5.2+dfsg1-4

Control: fixed -1 4.5.2+dfsg1-4 Hi Peter, it is normal to find this issue in version 4.5.2+dfsg1-3 since it has been fixed in 4.5.2+dfsg1-4!

Bug#977960: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977960: dangling /usr/share/javascript/jquery/jquery.js symlink

y/jquery.js libjs-jquery: /usr/share/javascript/jquery/jquery.js $ ls -l /usr/share/javascript/jquery/jquery.js lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 34 22 déc. 08:27 /usr/share/javascript/jquery/jquery.js -> ../../nodejs/jquery/dist/jquery.js $ ls -lL /usr/share/javascript/jquery/jquery.js -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 287600 22 déc. 08:27 /usr/share/javascript/jquery/jquery.js Cheers, Xavier

Bug#977962: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977962: webpack: mkdirp > 1 patch seems broken

memfs adds hooks to simulate a filesystem and overrides webpack/mkdirp calls, simulating mkdirp 0.53. You can fix this in memfs to return a promise instead of waiting for a callback Cheers, Xavier

Bug#977960: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977960: dangling /usr/share/javascript/jquery/jquery.js symlink

Le 23/12/2020 à 12:34, Matthias Klose a écrit : > On 12/23/20 12:19 PM, Xavier wrote: >> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo >> >> Le 23/12/2020 à 12:06, Matthias Klose a écrit : >>> Package: libjs-jquery >>> Version: 3.5.1+dfsg+~3.5.5-1 >>> Severity: s

Bug#977963: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-commander ≥ 6

Le 23/12/2020 à 13:28, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2020-12-23 13:06:40) >> Quoting Xavier (2020-12-23 12:28:53) >>> Le 23/12/2020 à 12:19, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >>>> Quoting Xavier (2020-12-23 11:34:41) >>>>> node-comman

Bug#977960: again not fixed

Control: tags -1 help Le 25/12/2020 à 10:34, Matthias Klose a écrit : > Control: reopen -1 > Control: found -1 3.5.1+dfsg+~3.5.5-3 > > the changelog reads: > > * Team upload > * libjs-jquery must require node-jquery with the same version > (Closes: #977960) > > and after the upgrade: >

Bug#978051: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#978051: node-consolidate depends on babel-core 6

Le 25/12/2020 à 09:55, Xavier Guimard a écrit : > Package: node-consolidate > Version: 0.15.1+repack-1 > Severity: serious > > Enabling test proves that node-consolidate depends on node-babel-core 6: > > ``` > function requireReact(module, filename) { >

Bug#978127: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#978127: make it easy to specify autopkgtest restrictions in pkg-js-tools

Le 26/12/2020 à 10:45, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > Package: pkg-js-tools,node-css-loader > Severity: wishlist > > node-css-loader autopkgtest fails because of a deprecation warning in > stderr. In manual autopkgtest, we can easily add Restrictions: > allow-stderr, provide a way to pass this to auto

Bug#978127: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#978127: Bug#978127: make it easy to specify autopkgtest restrictions in pkg-js-tools

Le 26/12/2020 à 10:50, Xavier a écrit : > Le 26/12/2020 à 10:45, Pirate Praveen a écrit : >> Package: pkg-js-tools,node-css-loader >> Severity: wishlist >> >> node-css-loader autopkgtest fails because of a deprecation warning in >> stderr. In manual autopkgtes

Bug#975794: FTBFS: Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'Duplex | Pick | Agent | PromiseLike'.

>> + tsc >> src/promisify.ts(27,15): error TS2345: Argument of type 'Duplex | >> Pick | Agent | undefined' is not assignable to >> parameter of type 'Duplex | Pick | Agent | >> PromiseLike'. >> Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'Duplex | Pick> "addRequest"> | Agent | PromiseLike'. >>

Bug#975877: libjs-sizzle: Please embed typescript definitions

Le 26/11/2020 à 07:00, László Böszörményi (GCS) a écrit : > On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 6:15 AM Xavier Guimard wrote: >> Package: libjs-sizzle > [...] >> A proposal package is ready in https://salsa.debian/org/js-team/sizzle, >> it fixes this and the 2 other bugs: >> *

Bug#973741: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#973741: gitlab: Yarn hasn't been able to find a cache folder it can use

Le 28/11/2020 à 20:28, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 23:50:24 +0530 Pirate Praveen > wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 18:58, Xavier wrote: >> > we opened bugs to upstream repo and are waiting for... >> >> I don't think

Bug#595781: Maybe fixed ?

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Hi, could you verify if this bug still exists in Cyrus-Imapd 3.2.x ? Cheers, Xavier (new Cyrus-Imapd maintainer)

Bug#962362: Bug fixed ?

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Hi, since 3.2.5, Debian has no more Sieveshell patch. Could you verify that bug still exists ? Cheers, Xavier

Bug#976186: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976186: node-backbone: Please provides typescript definition

Le 01/12/2020 à 12:21, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Xavier Guimard (2020-12-01 06:22:15) >> node-typescript-types is deprecated, please embed @types/backbone in >> node-backbone. > > Thanks for filing as a formal bugreport! > > Working on it... Hi, note th

Bug#889058: Workaround for node-ava

] } Anyway, jest has not exactly the same features than ava. Especially some throwsAsync / notThrowsAsync test should be removed or modified. Cheers, Xavier

Bug#976310: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976310: node-compression-webpack-plugin: TypeError: (0 , _schemaUtils.validate) is not a function

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Le 03/12/2020 à 09:54, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > Package: node-compression-webpack-plugin > Version: 3.0.1-3 > Severity: serious > Control: affects -1 gitlab > > Installation of gitlab started failing with the following error. I think > this is related to the recent u

Bug#976310: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976310: node-compression-webpack-plugin: TypeError: (0 , _schemaUtils.validate) is not a function

Le 03/12/2020 à 10:13, Xavier a écrit : > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > Le 03/12/2020 à 09:54, Pirate Praveen a écrit : >> Package: node-compression-webpack-plugin >> Version: 3.0.1-3 >> Severity: serious >> Control: affects -1 gitlab >> >> In

Bug#976331: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976331: node-compression-webpack-plugin, node-copy-webpack-plugin, node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin: contains hidden embedded nodejs module serialize-javascript

Severity raised since the lack of virtual package blocks upgrading > node-terser. > > - Jonas Hi, for now, dh-sequence-nodejs adds a "Provides" item for modules installed in root nodejs directories. Do we want to declare a "node-foo" for submodules (installed in a /node_modules directory) ? Cheers, Xavier

Bug#976331: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976331: Bug#976331: node-compression-webpack-plugin, node-copy-webpack-plugin, node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin: contains hidden embedded nodejs module serialize-jav

Le 03/12/2020 à 14:24, Xavier a écrit : > Le 03/12/2020 à 12:44, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >> Package: > node-compression-webpack-plugin,node-copy-webpack-plugin,node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin >> Severity: important >> >> These source packages embed nodejs module s

Bug#976331: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976331: Bug#976331: Bug#976331: node-compression-webpack-plugin, node-copy-webpack-plugin, node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin: contains hidden embedded nodejs module s

Le 03/12/2020 à 15:12, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Xavier (2020-12-03 14:35:25) >> Le 03/12/2020 à 14:24, Xavier a écrit : >>> Le 03/12/2020 à 12:44, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >>>> These source packages embed nodejs module serialize-javascript >>>

Bug#976331: [JS Policy] what to set in "Provides" field ?

Le 03/12/2020 à 16:36, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Xavier (2020-12-03 15:44:48) >> Le 03/12/2020 à 15:12, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >>> Quoting Xavier (2020-12-03 14:35:25) >>>> Le 03/12/2020 à 14:24, Xavier a écrit : >>>>> Le 03/12/2020 à 1

Bug#976341: node-jest: please provide real (not virtual) package node-jest-worker

/~yadd/jest-spaghetti-dish.png this makes sense. Do you see some other jest parts that should be separated? Cheers, Xavier

Bug#976331: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976331: [JS Policy] what to set in "Provides" field ?

Le 03/12/2020 à 18:21, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Xavier (2020-12-03 17:33:18) >> Le 03/12/2020 à 16:36, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >>> Quoting Xavier (2020-12-03 15:44:48) >>>> Le 03/12/2020 à 15:12, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >>>>> Quoting

Bug#976331: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976331: Bug#976331: [JS Policy] what to set in "Provides" field ?

Le 03/12/2020 à 19:17, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Xavier (2020-12-03 18:42:17) >> Le 03/12/2020 à 18:21, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >>> Quoting Xavier (2020-12-03 17:33:18) >>>> Le 03/12/2020 à 16:36, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >>>>> Quoting

Bug#973342: buster-pu: package libdbi-perl/1.642-1+deb10u2

Le 03/12/2020 à 21:50, Salvatore Bonaccorso a écrit : > Hi Xavier, > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 06:14:05PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> Control: tags -1 + confirmed >> >> On Thu, 2020-10-29 at 07:43 +0100, Xavier Guimard wrote: >>> libdbi-perl is still vul

Bug#976341: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976341: node-jest: please provide real (not virtual) package node-jest-worker

Le 03/12/2020 à 19:05, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Xavier (2020-12-03 18:30:54) >> Control: tags -1 + confirmed >> >> Le 03/12/2020 à 18:07, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >>> node-rollup-plugin-terser has a runtime dependency on >>> node-jest-worker

Bug#974648: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974648: Please really ship TypeScript definitions

Le 13/11/2020 à 12:04, Xavier a écrit : > Le 13/11/2020 à 11:26, Julien Puydt a écrit : >> Package: jest >> Version: 26.6.3+ds+~cs64.27.30-1 >> >> The file /usr/share/nodejs/package.json says the TypeScript definitions >> are available in build/jest.d.ts, but

Bug#976341: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976341: Bug#976341: node-jest: please provide real (not virtual) package node-jest-worker

Le 04/12/2020 à 15:32, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Xavier (2020-12-04 11:48:58) >> Le 03/12/2020 à 19:05, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >>> Quoting Xavier (2020-12-03 18:30:54) >>>> Le 03/12/2020 à 18:07, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >>>>> Please

Bug#976341: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976341: Bug#976341: node-jest: please provide real (not virtual) package node-jest-worker

Le 04/12/2020 à 15:32, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Xavier (2020-12-04 11:48:58) >> Le 03/12/2020 à 19:05, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >>> Quoting Xavier (2020-12-03 18:30:54) >>>> Le 03/12/2020 à 18:07, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >>>>> Please

Bug#976409: glibc breaks node-iconv autopkgtest: AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: Missing expected exception

Control: tags -1 + ftbfs Le 04/12/2020 à 20:46, Paul Gevers a écrit : > Source: glibc, node-iconv > Control: found -1 glibc/2.31-5 > Control: found -1 node-iconv/2.3.5-4 > Severity: serious > Tags: sid bullseye > X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertag

Bug#976607: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976607: node-cheerio: please package (much!) newer release 1.0rc3

Control: tags -1 + pending Le 05/12/2020 à 19:19, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Package: node-cheerio > Version: 0.22.0-2 > Severity: normal > > Hi, > > Thanks for packaging Cheerio. > > Currently packaged release is the latest upstream stable release, > but was released 4 years ago . 1.0rc1 was

Bug#974648: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974648: Bug#974648: Please really ship TypeScript definitions

Le 04/12/2020 à 14:47, Xavier a écrit : > Le 13/11/2020 à 12:04, Xavier a écrit : >> Le 13/11/2020 à 11:26, Julien Puydt a écrit : >>> Package: jest >>> Version: 26.6.3+ds+~cs64.27.30-1 >>> >>> The file /usr/share/nodejs/package.json says the Type

Bug#976618: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976618: node-cosmiconfig, jest: embedded module tied to large (build-)dependency tree

Le 05/12/2020 à 22:22, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Package: node-cosmiconfig,jest > Severity: normal > > Both node-cosmiconfig and jest embed Nodejs module callsites. > > jest provides it as virtual package node-callsites, > but jest has a much larger (build-dependency tree. > > Please consider

Bug#976618: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976618: Bug#976618: node-cosmiconfig, jest: embedded module tied to large (build-)dependency tree

Le 05/12/2020 à 22:48, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Xavier (2020-12-05 22:34:06) >> Le 05/12/2020 à 22:22, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >>> Package: node-cosmiconfig,jest >>> Severity: normal >>> >>> Both node-cosmiconfig and jest embed Nodejs

Bug#976618: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976618: Bug#976618: node-cosmiconfig, jest: embedded module tied to large (build-)dependency tree

Le 05/12/2020 à 22:48, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Xavier (2020-12-05 22:34:06) >> Le 05/12/2020 à 22:22, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >>> Package: node-cosmiconfig,jest >>> Severity: normal >>> >>> Both node-cosmiconfig and jest embed Nodejs

Bug#976331: [JS Policy] what to set in "Provides" field ?

Le 06/12/2020 à 02:14, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Xavier (2020-12-03 21:19:48) >> Le 03/12/2020 à 19:17, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >>> Quoting Xavier (2020-12-03 18:42:17) >>>> Le 03/12/2020 à 18:21, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >>>>> Quoting

Bug#974587: node-uuid: Bad "exports" field?

Le Lundi, Décembre 07, 2020 13:55 CET, Pirate Praveen a écrit: > On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 16:25:14 +0100 Xavier Guimard > wrote: > > node-uuid breaks dependent package with error like: > > > > Package subpath './v1' is not defined by "exports&qu

Bug#976813: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976813: node-cosmiconfig: missing Breaks+Replaces: jest (<< 26.6.3+repack)

version. > But you also need matching Replaces to properly move files between packages > (the Breaks alone could also be satisfied by simply deconfiguring jest). Hi, what is wrong in "Breaks: jest (<< 2.26.3+repack~), node-jest-debbundle (<< 2.26.3+repack~)" ? Jest version in unstable is "26.6.3+repack+~cs61.38.31-1" It seems that jest will migrate tomorrow to testing, then this bug should be fixed automatically Cheers, Xavier

Bug#976813: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976813: node-cosmiconfig: missing Breaks+Replaces: jest (<< 26.6.3+repack)

Le 08/12/2020 à 10:12, Andreas Beckmann a écrit : > On 12/8/20 9:44 AM, Xavier wrote: >> what is wrong in "Breaks: jest (<< 2.26.3+repack~), node-jest-debbundle >> (<< 2.26.3+repack~)" ? Jest version in unstable is >> "26.6.3+repack+~cs61.38

Bug#976813: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976813: Bug#976813: node-cosmiconfig: missing Breaks+Replaces: jest (<< 26.6.3+repack)

Le 08/12/2020 à 10:04, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Xavier (2020-12-08 09:44:00) >> Le 08/12/2020 à 09:37, Andreas Beckmann a écrit : >>> Package: node-cosmiconfig >>> Version: 7.0.0+~cs8.3.2-1 >>> Severity: serious >>> User: debian...@lists

Bug#976813: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976813: Bug#976813: node-cosmiconfig: missing Breaks+Replaces: jest (<< 26.6.3+repack)

Le 08/12/2020 à 10:32, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2020-12-08 10:04:13) >> Quoting Xavier (2020-12-08 09:44:00) >>> what is wrong in "Breaks: jest (<< 2.26.3+repack~), node-jest-debbundle >>> (<< 2.26.3+repack~)"

Bug#976813: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976813: Bug#976813: Bug#976813: node-cosmiconfig: missing Breaks+Replaces: jest (<< 26.6.3+repack)

Le Mardi, Décembre 08, 2020 11:07 CET, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit: > Quoting Xavier (2020-12-08 10:47:20) > > Thanks, I had to replace "ds" by "repack" since checksum decreased: I > > removed a useless component. > > For future sake, "ds" really

Bug#976813: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976813: Bug#976813: Bug#976813: node-cosmiconfig: missing Breaks+Replaces: jest (<< 26.6.3+repack)

Le Mardi, Décembre 08, 2020 11:38 CET, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit: > Quoting Xavier (2020-12-08 11:33:40) > > Le Mardi, Décembre 08, 2020 11:07 CET, Jonas Smedegaard a > > écrit: > > > > > Quoting Xavier (2020-12-08 10:47:20) > > > > Thanks, I had

Bug#974648: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974648: Bug#974648: Bug#974648: Please really ship TypeScript definitions

Le 05/12/2020 à 22:16, Xavier a écrit : > > > Le 04/12/2020 à 14:47, Xavier a écrit : >> Le 13/11/2020 à 12:04, Xavier a écrit : >>> Le 13/11/2020 à 11:26, Julien Puydt a écrit : >>>> Package: jest >>>> Version: 26.6.3+ds+~cs64.27.30-1 >>&g

Bug#976905: src:cyrus-imapd: Please consider enabling JMAP support

Le 09/12/2020 à 10:04, Clement Hermann a écrit : > Package: src:cyrus-imapd > Severity: wishlist > > Hi, > > JMAP is a (relatively) new open standard for mailboxes access, more > mobile friendly and faster than IMAP. Think open source gmail api or > MAPI. It has been developed by people at Fastm

Bug#974594: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974594: node-snapdragon-node: missing Breaks+Replaces: node-snapdragon (<= 0.12.0+repack-2)

control: reassign -1 node-snapdragon control: affects -1 node-snapdragon-node Le 12/11/2020 à 20:47, Andreas Beckmann a écrit : > Package: node-snapdragon-node > Version: 3.0.0-2 > Severity: serious > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: piuparts > > Hi, > > during a test with piuparts I

Bug#974595: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974595: node-snapdragon-util: missing Breaks+Replaces: node-snapdragon (<= 0.12.0+repack-2)

Control: reassign -1 node-snapdragon Control: affects -1 node-snapdragon Le 12/11/2020 à 20:49, Andreas Beckmann a écrit : > Package: node-snapdragon-util > Version: 5.0.1-2 > Severity: serious > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: piuparts > > Hi, > > during a test with piuparts I noti

Bug#974648: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974648: Please really ship TypeScript definitions

Le 13/11/2020 à 11:26, Julien Puydt a écrit : > Package: jest > Version: 26.6.3+ds+~cs64.27.30-1 > > The file /usr/share/nodejs/package.json says the TypeScript definitions > are available in build/jest.d.ts, but the package doesn't contain that > file : the build/ directory only has jest.js. Hi,

Bug#974218: node-requirejs: Please embed typescript definitions

Le 14/11/2020 à 12:14, László Böszörményi (GCS) a écrit : > Hi, > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 2:39 PM Xavier Guimard wrote: >> Package: node-requirejs > [...] >> to avoid version conflicts, JS team decided to remove typescript >> definitions (node-typescript-types)

Bug#975009: Upgrading node-schema-utils

Hi, job looks finished with packages pushed to experimental, * field "Breaks" of node-schema-utils is updated * a local full rebuild of all webpack reverse dependencies shows that everything seems OK (except yarnpkg of course) * part of upstream test added (often using jest) for all upgraded

Bug#972932: node-eslint-scope: Please embed @types/eslint-scope

ke to package webpack-5 before freeze. Cheers, Xavier

Bug#975231: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#975231: node-async: FTBFS: test failed

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Le 19/11/2020 à 10:54, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : > Source: node-async > Version: 0.8.0-3 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS on amd64 > Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs > Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye > > Hi, > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your p

Bug#974218: node-requirejs: Please embed typescript definitions

Le 19/11/2020 à 15:21, Georges Khaznadar a écrit : > Dear Xavier, > > please feel free to adopt completely the package requirejs, you are > most welcome! > > I took the responsability of this package seven year ago, when it was not > maintained, and was a dependency

Bug#973741: gitlab: Yarn hasn't been able to find a cache folder it can use

ven that > latest interaction in e.g. #960120 dates back to August) so it could > make it into bullseye? :) > > Thanks! > > regards > -mika- Hi, we opened bugs to upstream repo and are waiting for... Cheers, Xavier

Bug#975362: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#975362: src:node-rollup-plugin-json: contains source-less wasm code

Le 20/11/2020 à 19:33, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Package: src:node-rollup-plugin-json > Version: 4.1.0+~4.0.0-2 > Severity: serious > Justification: Policy 2.1 > > source contains compiled webassembly code from project wabt. > > A corresponding lintian override has the comment "Unused files", >

Bug#974218: node-requirejs: Please embed typescript definitions

Le 14/11/2020 à 12:14, László Böszörményi (GCS) a écrit : > Hi, > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 2:39 PM Xavier Guimard wrote: >> Package: node-requirejs > [...] >> to avoid version conflicts, JS team decided to remove typescript >> definitions (node-typescript-types)

Bug#949243: Unable to reproduce

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Hi, I'm unable to reproduce this bug after many tries

Bug#848315: ITP: node-cheerio -- Server-side jQuery implementation

Hi, node-cherrio is also needed to update node-dom-serializer, that's why I pushed it

Bug#972952: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#972952: node-mkdirp 1.0 is incompatible with 0.5, breaks yarnpkg

fresh packages... > success Saved lockfile. > Done in 0.07s. Hi JS Team, yarnpkg is not in testing due to babel problems. Do you agree to dicrease severity of this bug to allow mkdirp transition (or reassign this bug to node-yarnpkg) ? Cheers, Xavier

Bug#972952: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#972952: node-mkdirp 1.0 is incompatible with 0.5, breaks yarnpkg

Le 26/10/2020 à 20:50, Paolo Greppi a écrit : > Hi Xavier, > > Il 26/10/20 20:24, Xavier ha scritto: >> Le 26/10/2020 à 15:28, ano...@users.sourceforge.net a écrit : >>>    ... >> >> Hi JS Team, >> >> yarnpkg is not in testing due to babel proble

Bug#973081: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#973081: pdf.js: FTBFS: [12:18:32] TypeError: Cannot read property 'then' of undefined

Control: reassign -1 webpack Control: affects -1 src:pdf.js Le 27/10/2020 à 18:09, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : > Source: pdf.js > Version: 2.6.347+dfsg-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS on amd64 > Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs > Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye > > Hi, > > During a reb

Bug#973170: node-formidable: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /bin/sh -ex debian/tests/pkg-js/test returned exit code 1

Control: reassign -1 node-fetch Control: affects -1 node-formidable Le 27/10/2020 à 18:07, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : > Source: node-formidable > Version: 1.2.1+20200129git8231ea6-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS on amd64 > Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs > Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullse

Bug#973081: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#973081: Bug#973081: pdf.js: FTBFS: [12:18:32] TypeError: Cannot read property 'then' of undefined

Control: reassign -1 src:pdf.js Control: found -1 2.6.347+dfsg-1 Le 27/10/2020 à 23:29, Xavier a écrit : > Control: reassign -1 webpack > Control: affects -1 src:pdf.js > > Le 27/10/2020 à 18:09, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : >> Source: pdf.js >> Version: 2.6.347+dfs

Bug#973170: node-fetch has no default export

Control: retitle -1 node-fetch has no default export Le 27/10/2020 à 21:47, Xavier a écrit : > Control: reassign -1 node-fetch > Control: affects -1 node-formidable > > Le 27/10/2020 à 18:07, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : >> Source: node-formidable >> Version: 1.2.1+20200129

Bug#973374: uscan: 'pgpmode=gittag' fails when USCAN_DESTDIR is set

Control: tags -1 + pending See https://salsa.debian.org/debian/devscripts/-/merge_requests/205 Cheers, Xavier

Bug#973614: lemonldap-ng: Please use libfido2 rather than libu2f-server

f-server from Debian. > > > Best, Hi, libu2f-server isn't a dependency of lemonldap-ng itself but a dependency of libcrypt-u2f-server-perl (same team, and same upstream maintainer ;-)). Cheers, Xavier

Bug#973637: flag debian/watch files that use older versions of the format

> Hi Jelmer > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 9:57 AM Jelmer Vernooij > wrote: > > > > It would be great if lintian could flag debian/watch files that > > didn't use a watch file format version or use an older version > > (< 4). > > Can you just use the existing classification tag > debian-watch-file-sta

Bug#973700: RFP: nodejs-client (?) -- a client for browser's extensions

Le 03/11/2020 à 16:39, Janusz S. Bień a écrit : > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > > * Package name: nodejs-client (?) > Version : > Upstream Author : Andy Portmen > * URL or Web page : https://github.com/andy-portmen/native-client > * License : > Description :

Bug#973702: licensecheck should read "license" field from package.json files

Le 03/11/2020 à 18:30, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2020-11-03 17:19:10) >> Quoting Xavier Guimard (2020-11-03 17:07:02) >>> when launching licensecheck in a nodejs module, I'd like to see >>> licensecheck reveals which license is used in

Bug#973702: licensecheck should read "license" field from package.json files

Le 3 novembre 2020 19:50:52 GMT+01:00, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >Quoting Xavier (2020-11-03 18:35:48) >> Le 03/11/2020 à 18:30, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >> > Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2020-11-03 17:19:10) >> >> Quoting Xavier Guimard (2020-11-03 1

Bug#963320: libtgvoip: FTBFS: AttributeError: module 'string' has no attribute 'maketrans'

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Hi, I'm unable to reproduce the bug: libtgvoip build works fine here. Could you verify that the bug still exists? Cheers, Xavier

Bug#963320: libtgvoip: FTBFS: AttributeError: module 'string' has no attribute 'maketrans'

Le 06/11/2020 à 19:08, Nicholas Guriev a écrit : > On Thu, 2020-11-05 at 06:27 +0100, Xavier wrote: >> I'm unable to reproduce the bug: libtgvoip build works fine here. Could >> you verify that the bug still exists? >> >> Cheers, >> Xavier > > Xavier

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >