Package: libftdi0
Version: 0.7-1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
The URL where the source can be downloaded has changed.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel:
Package: ipw2100-source
Version: 1.1.0-1
Severity: minor
The installed file has the following attributes:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 114028 2005-03-26 18:41 ipw2100-source.tar.gz
Please note, that the date is "March 26". This leads (at least in my
case) to confusion, if it is really the newest ver
Package: kdessh
Version: 4:3.3.2-1
Severity: important
as now the ssh packets are split into openssh-client and openssh-server
packages, the dependencies should be changed to this packages
(maybe openssh-server as recommended, and openssh-client as required)
The ssh package itself is marked "tra
Package: udev
Version: 0.062-3
Followup-For: Bug #317332
Severity: grave
The package should be name a dependecy on kernel-2.6.12
This fault can make a system unusable (think of remote machines.)
-- Package-specific info:
-- /etc/udev/rules.d/:
/etc/udev/rules.d/:
total 0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root
Package: kdevelop3
Version: 4:3.2.0-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
"kdelibs4" is not available anymore. This makes this package in
uninstallable or forces to uninstall due other updates.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
merge 326929 326883
thanks
Jeremy Laine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 06.09.05 19:37:42:
Hi Tobias,
I submitted a similar bug today and sent a patch to build KDevelop 3.2.2 against
the latest Qt / KDE libs:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=326883
Jeremy
--
http://www.jerry
Subject: fetchmail: Submitting Patch, Correcting tags
Followup-For: Bug #262257
Package: fetchmail
Version: 6.3.6~rc3
As the package is not yet uploaded, I built the package locally.
Attached is the patch I used for that. It only fixes the problem.
(As a suggestion, one could also add "popclient
Package: gramofile
Version: 1.6-7
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
As wodim is now replacing cdrecord in debian, please update your
debian/config file, and allowing to remove the transitional package
"cdrecord"
Attached is a patch, which will update the debian/control file.
NOTE: I'm working on a pat
+# This patch removes all occurences of "cdrecord" in the source and
documentation.
+# This includes removing a link to a (not existing anymore) site of Schilling.
+#
+# Also changes the packagefile to suggest wodim instead of cdrecord.
+#
+# by Tobias Frost, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 12-31-2006
Package: gramofile
Version: 1.6-7
Followup-For: Bug #405101
Please disregard the prevoius patch. I did the patch in the wrong file,
as I was blind to see that you use dpatch...
Well, here is the complete patch, removing all (but one in the TODO)
occurence of cdrecord.
The patch modified two file
Package: fetchmail
Version: 6.3.6~rc3-1
Followup-For: Bug #262257
REOPENING, because bug is still there!
#apt-cache show fetchmail | grep -e Version: -e Conflicts:
Version: 6.3.6~rc3-1
Conflicts: popclient, fetchmail-common, logcheck (<< 1.1.1-9),
fetchmail-ssl (<= 6.2.5-12)
-- System Inform
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.7.2.2
Severity: wishlist
Looking at #262257, as an exampple, there are packages which declares
conflicts for whatever reason. However, the reason is NOT, that thec
packages could not co-existent on the same system (For the example,
retchmail could be also installe
Package: eterm
Version: 0.9.4.0debian1-2
Severity: important
Seems that the file-parameter is not io...
Also, it seems, that the programm lacks to check for the result, as it
does not fail (it also ask the question, but does not wait for user input).
Exit-Code is also "0" even if a failure occur
Severity 401820 grave
Tags 401820 + patch
thanks
Justification: Renders package (almost) unuseable, and this is not good
for edge. (If after resume, like using powersaved, changes are high,
this will give no working graphics at all...)
Subject: 915resolution: Patch works
Followup-For: Bug #401820
tags 406825 upstream
retitle 406825 rt2500-source: rt2500 fails to build in kernel2.6.20-rc5
thanks
Retitle:
I used rc5 not rc3.
(This was a typo...)
Upstream
I filed the bug in the projects BTS at sf.net
PS: why it is marked done?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
tags 406825 upstream
retitle 406825 rt2500-source: rt2500 fails to build in kernel2.6.20-rc5
thanks
Retitle:
I used rc5 not rc3.
(This was a typo...)
Upstream
I filed the bug in the projects BTS at sf.net
PS: why is the bug marked done?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
ias,
>
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 05:00:34PM +0100, Tobias Frost wrote:
> >
> > I have to correct the upstream tag, as this is not in upstream.
> > looking at mp3check_0.8.0-4.diff.gz, this is where the bug was introduced.
> >
>
> Looking at the package changelog,
Package: xserver-xorg-video-i810-modesetting
Version: 1.6.5.git20061014.ac1-1
Severity: important
After X is started. switching back to a text console ("Ctrl+F1" as
example), the text console just "flickers" and is completly unusable.
(However, the console is responsible, so a "blind" login works
Package: mp3check
Version: 0.8.0-4
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Using mp3check to remove junk deletes id3-info, even if it tells not to
so. Can it be, that in retrying the junk-end detection, the
id3-detection fails, or the restoring of the id-tags fails?
Here's an
Package: mp3check
Version: 0.8.0-4
Followup-For: Bug #399047
I found the bug, and here's the patch.
Also, upstream will be informed...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i6
tags 399047 -upstream
thanks
I have to correct the upstream tag, as this is not in upstream.
looking at mp3check_0.8.0-4.diff.gz, this is where the bug was introduced.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just a question: Is the bug fixed or not...
The changelog implies, that it is, so can we close that bug then?
Or is this still an issue?
_
Der WEB.DE SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen!
http://smartsurfer.we
2007-04-19 16:22:03.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+avr-libc (1:1.4.5-3) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * debian/control: changed build-depends to fix FTBFS
+
+ -- Tobias Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:21:32 +0100
+
avr-libc (1:1.4.5-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Conver
Package: avr-libc
Version: 1:1.4.5-3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
In the include file for the at90pwm devices, in the register PLLCSR,
one bit has the wrong name.
According the datasheet (Atmel document id 4317H–AVR–12/06, page 36) bit
#2 should have the name PLLF, not PCKE.
The attached patch fi
I also filed the bug upstream.
http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?19650
Tobi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
severity 420443 grave
thanks
Justification: Breaks whole mail subsystem. Neither send nor receive is
possbile. After sending server giving up, mail loss will occour. On not
proberbly configured mail servers, mail loss will occour after first
delivery attempt. (they exists: my univeristy has one)
Package: avr-libc
Followup-For: Bug #420163
The attached patch addes these Bits to the register ADCSRB
ADHSM 7 /* ADC High Speed Mode */
ADTS3 3 /* ADC Auto Trigger Source 3 */
Tobi
Filed upstream as bug #19666
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT polic
found 420163 1:1.4.5-2
thanks
Correction of the version... 1.4.5.3 is my local generated package.
--
++[>++>+++>>+>++><<-]>+++.
>++.---.>>--.>.<.<<+++.---.>>>.<<<+.>>+.<<---.
>-. >>>+++.
PGP-KeyID: 0x0DBDCA9B
--
To
Package: harden-clients
Severity: minor
The ssh package is a transitional package and replaced by
the openssh-client and openssh-server packagages.
Maybe it is a good idea to require these instead of ssh?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy
Severity: wishlist
thanks
Sorry for interfering, but why do you think this is RC-critical?
___
Viren-Scan für Ihren PC! Jetzt für jeden. Sofort, online und kostenlos.
Gleich testen! http://www.pc-sicherheit.web.de/freescan/?mc=
severity 392524 wishlist
thanks
Mhpf... Forgot to edit command
___
Viren-Scan für Ihren PC! Jetzt für jeden. Sofort, online und kostenlos.
Gleich testen! http://www.pc-sicherheit.web.de/freescan/?mc=02
merge 392540 392541
thanks
--
++[>++>+++>>+>++><<-]>+++.
>++.---.>>--.>.<.<<+++.---.>>>.<<<+.>>+.<<---.
>-. >>>+++.
PGP-KeyID: 0x0DBDCA9B
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.4.2-1
Severity: normal
If running "aptitude -u" as regular user, and then pressing enter on the
prompt "become root", it segfaults.
If run as root, it is fine and works.
Also, if run as regular user without "-u", and then pressing "u" it
works too.
Attached is a str
Package: mediawiki1.7
Followup-For: Bug #392941
I think, this bug is originated in bad dependency, and therefore
a seroius Debian Policy Violation.
If you think, that mediawiki-1.5 and mediawiki-1.7-xxx shoould not
be installed together, they have to conflict.
But as a debian maintainer, you sur
Package: mediawiki
Severity: serious
Justification: Violation of Debian Policy 3.3
The address is <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and as it showed up in bug #392941, this is a -private- member-only
email list, which can -- and did in 392941 -- can bounce.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unsta
reference, here is the original mail:
On 09/20/2013 02:16 PM, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Dear Monty Taylor,
>
> How are you? I hope that you are fine.
All is quite well, thanks!
> I was wondering about your packages python-drizzle and plywood, which
> has a few important bugs pending and o
original mail:
On 09/20/2013 02:16 PM, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Dear Monty Taylor,
>
> How are you? I hope that you are fine.
All is quite well, thanks!
> I was wondering about your packages python-drizzle and plywood, which
> has a few important bugs pending and only being NMUed the l
Package: wnpp
Followup-For: Bug #724231
For your reference, I just requested removal of this package
See #724231
--
coldtobi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Followup-For: Bug #724269
For reference, I just requested removal of this package.
See #733486
--
coldtobi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: drizzle
Severity: wishlist
Followup-For: Bug #733292
Fix just commited to the repository.
Thanks for reporting,
--
coldtobi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi Andreas,
can you please clearify as requested...
(If this bug was a mistake, please just close it :)
Thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
r the overhaul of the simple aspell directoires on
debian-devel et.al, if that is ok with you.
Best regards,
--
Tobias
Am Donnerstag, den 13.02.2014, 17:22 +0100 schrieb Agustin Martin:
> On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 07:09:22PM +0100, Agustin Martin wrote:
> > 2014-02-08 11:19 GMT+01:0
> > ++ if [ -e /dev/urandom -a -f DwRandPrime.h ] ; then mv -f
> > DwRandPrime.h DwRandPrime.h.bak ; fi ; ./RandomPrime > DwRandPrime.h
> >
> > note that the only change is to move the "fi" to the left to unconditionally
> > run ./RandomPr
Hi Jackson,
(Please note that I am not an DD)
Some remarks, not a complete review:
-> you should change the bug-title of 677709 to ITA and set yourself as owner
-> d/copyright:
I think you need also to include a shorttext on the Apache-2.0 license, not
only the link to /usr/share/common-licenses
I'm not sure if the first assignement was right and the mainatiner got the
bugerport in the first place, so explecitly forwarding it. (Sorry for the
noise)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb
Hi Tong,
You should always have an updated development system.
It can also be a chroot, so it won't interfere with your daily needed
installation. ( Indeed, a chroot for dev work has other advantages too; IMHO
strongly suggested to use it always..)
--
coldtobi
Tong Sun schrieb:
>Hi Eribert
Package is now in NEW.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
dependency -- in my
experierence only depending on libboost-dev is sufficient for most package and
will in the long run ease subsequent boost transistions.
Thanks
--
Tobias Frost
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
No, it was not a new one.
Just retried with a freshly created pbuilder enviorment:
Unfortunatly it fails here with the same error as in the buildds :(
(tried on amd64 and i386)
coldtobi
Am Wednesday, den 05.02.2014, 20:22 +0100 schrieb Philipp Kern:
> On 2014-02-05 18:36, coldtobi wrote:
> > I t
src:dutch, src:dsdo and
src:norwegian)
To start the discussion e.g on debian-devel, dict-common-dev and with
the individual maintainers, can you maybe upload already the current
state to experimental, even if the docs are still incomplete?
Thanks!
--
Tobias Frost
Am Freitag, den 07.02.2014,
ld me that he is no longer
interested in maintaining the paackage. Therefore orphaning it or
informing the remaining (co)maintainers.
Dear co-maintainers, it would be great if you could indicate on this bug
that your are still active and indicate if you intend maintain it :)
Thanks!
--
Tobias F
other options is to silence package-contains-broken-symlink
in this specific case.
Can you do that?
Best regards,
Tobias Frost
Am Samstag, den 08.02.2014, 12:27 +0100 schrieb Andreas Beckmann:
> On 2014-02-08 11:19, Tobias Frost wrote:
>
> > I just have an additional suggestion
o generated the links on install-time, but I agree on
Andreas that this would be somehow overkill.
The other options is to silence package-contains-broken-symlink
in this specific case.
Can you do that?
Best regards,
Tobias Frost
Am Samstag, den 08.02.2014, 12:27 +0100 schrieb Andreas Beckmann:
>
Hallo Andreas,
Thanks for the report, however, I'm kind of lost with your failure description
/ what you wanted to archive. Can you please elaborate, maybe using the
template provided by reportbug?
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (o
Package: gdm3
Followup-For: Bug #724731
Same here, libpam-systemd did NOT solve the issue.
When using gdm3, I get a splash screen saying that something went wrong
( "Oops! A problem has occured! .. ") with the only option too log out.
No greeter, username field or password field.
-- System In
Package: gerbv
Version: 2.6.0-1
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Generating a project file with some gerber layers, modifying attribtes
of the layers (e.g mirroring, translation) or transparency level and saving it
close it and reload it
* What was the
Package: flashcache-dkms
Version: 3.1.1+git20131019-1
Severity: serious
Dear Maintainer,
At the moment flashcache seems only to support amd64, at least on i386 the
kernel module cannot be loaded due to undefined symbols:
[ 3694.936086] flashcache: Unknown symbol __divdi3 (err 0)
[ 3694.936503] f
Package: mdadm
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
Currently when initrd is updated, mdadm is configured it this warning:
W: mdadm: unchecked configuration file: /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf
W: mdadm: please read /usr/share/doc/mdadm/README.upgrading-2.5.3.gz .
However, there is no such file.
ls -la /us
On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 22:59 +0100, peter green wrote:
> Package: log4cxx
> Version: 0.10.0-2
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
> User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
> Usertag: arm64
>
> Your package failed to build on arm64 with the following error.
>
> Invalid configuration `aarch64-linux-gnu':
Am Friday, den 20.06.2014, 18:40 +0200 schrieb Agustin Martin:
> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 12:09:38PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > On Sat, 2014-05-24 at 18:13 +0200, Agustin Martin wrote:
> > > 2014-05-19 22:00 GMT+02:00 Tobias Frost :
> > > >
> > > > I r
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tobias Frost
* Package name: soci
Version : 3.2.2
Upstream Author : see http://soci.sourceforge.net/people.html
* URL : http://soci.sourceforge.net/
* License : Boost Software License 1.0
Programming Lang: C
On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 20:28 +0200, Julian Taylor wrote:
> hi, nice to hear someone wants to add soci back.
> I have packaged it for personal use a while back. The packaging hasn't
> been updated in a while but it might still be useful if you aren't
> finished yet.
> It is available here:
> https:/
Here's the package-Repository:
https://gitorious.org/soci-debian/soci-debian
(However, as my NM process is still waiting for DAM approval, I will not
immediately upload it.)
--
tobi
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 14:27 +0200, Benedict Verhegghe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am urgently looking for a sponsor willing to help with uploading my
> packages
> The old pyfomrex-0.8.6-4 packages currently in testing/sid (besides
> being obsolete) do not build anymore. See bug #750351.
> https://bugs.debi
Hi Łukasz,
(Please note, I just can review, but I can't sponsor you.)
d/control:
- XSBC-Original-Maintainer is ubuntu specific, please remove.
- The versioned dependency on doxygen is not needed as oldstable
fulfills it already.
- same for cmake
- Vcs-Bzr/Vcs-Broswe is to keep the Debian bit
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tobias Frost
* Package name: cppdb
Version : 0.3.1
Upstream Author : Artyom Beilis (Tonkikh)
* URL : http://cppcms.com/sql/cppdb/index.html
* License : Boost Software License 1.0
Programming Lang: C++)
Description
On Sun, 2014-06-29 at 01:00 -0300, Marcio de Souza Oliveira wrote:
> >>I put now GPL-2.0+ in debian/copyright
> >But that's not what upstream says. They say explicitly “version 2 only
> >of the License”.
>
> >Ping? I can't upload a package with incorrect d/copyright.
>
> I put now GPL-2.0.
>
>
On Sun, 2014-06-29 at 10:25 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Tobias Frost , 2014-06-29, 10:00:
> >On Sun, 2014-06-29 at 01:00 -0300, Marcio de Souza Oliveira wrote:
> >>I got it wrong. But I see
> >>GPLv2(http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.txt) and and there contains
>
Hi Steven,
Please note, I can only review, but I cannot sponsor as my NM process is
not yet finished...
On Sun, 2014-06-29 at 20:30 +1000, Steven Hamilton wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mrrescue"
Source: gnome-scan
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
The current watchfile does not work, it only finds version 0.2.2
Please see attached one which also detects 0.7-version. It also prefers the bz2
tarball.
old:
$ LANG=C uscan --no-download
Processing w
Package: gitolite
Followup-For: Bug #653981
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hallo,
I wrote a manpage for gl-setup. (Attached)
Maybe you want to include it?
- --
Tobi
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Arch
vo6sCj2GUY
/Qcjgw5pd2S2o1CNhG1Jw02VvRRdwmC6Ra4a7qqqKVnghQTiI3gRBy61b+e/sPES
fzUXMj33f7URFECMduV4
=omeL
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
# SOME DESCRIPTIVE TITLE.
# Copyright (C) YEAR THE PACKAGE'S COPYRIGHT HOLDER
# This file is distributed under the same license as the PACKAGE package.
# FIRST AUTHOR , YEAR.
# Tobias Frost , 2014.
#
msgid "
sh9h1AR+8X
RltO5OZqLIu2vuZdYCr5HqxWon4FveTcZFLtplrIOMD2LGPUQ5jkXIgnVNrH+Ydy
AZAcc26sYMEauefEUJ++
=EW0r
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
# SOME DESCRIPTIVE TITLE.
# Copyright (C) YEAR THE PACKAGE'S COPYRIGHT HOLDER
# This file is distributed under the same license as the PACKAGE package.
# FIRST AUTHOR , YEAR.
# Tobias Frost , 2014.
#
Am Sonntag, den 13.04.2014, 19:31 +0200 schrieb Holger Wansing:
> Hi,
>
> Tobias Frost wrote:
> > Source: clamav
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Tags: patch l10n
> >
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > Dear main
Am Montag, den 14.04.2014, 14:22 +0200 schrieb Michael Stapelberg:
> Hi coldtobi,
>
> coldtobi writes:
> > Maybe new imput:
> > On drizzle I had the same issue with database files.
> > My solution was to ask the user (debconf) if the files should be removed on
> > purge, and defaulted that to yes
Hallo Otto,
(disclaimer: I cannot sponsor it, I'm not a DD)
Am Freitag, den 18.04.2014, 13:20 +0300 schrieb Otto Kekäläinen:
> More information about MariaDB packaging can be obtained by asking
> me by e-mail, I promise to reply quickly.
>
> The packaging is very similar to that of mariadb-5
Am Samstag, den 19.04.2014, 10:24 +0300 schrieb Otto Kekäläinen:
> Hello Tobias,
>
> Thanks for looking into this. My comments:
>
>
> 2014-04-18 15:12 GMT+03:00 Tobias Frost :
> > Hallo Otto,
> >
> > (disclaimer: I cannot sponsor it, I'm not a DD)
>
Control: severity -1 normal
Hallo,
thanks for the report.
As far as I can see, libdrizzle0 is a different codebase than
libdrizzle4. though they seem to share the same roots.
Libdrizzle0 was indeed removed and is no longer available in Debian, one
reason was that there was drizzle and also no r
return DRIZZLE_RETURN_COULD_NOT_CONNECT;
(This is in function
drizzle_return_t drizzle_state_connect(drizzle_con_st *con)
The lines-# are for the latest version in sid, but as far as I see it
has not much changed since 7.1.36-stable)
Would be great if you could give it a try and let me know
Control: owner -1 t...@coldtobi.de
Setting myself as owner.
Thanks to Lemos for his efforts so far!
Best regards,
Tobias Frost
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
ects, both under the
Drizzle umbrella. libdrizzle 1.0/2.0 are bundled in Drizzle, 5.0/5.1
are separate and have an incompatible API
mailing list: https://lists.launchpad.net/drizzle-discuss/msg09514.html
Tobias Frost writes:
> I've got a bug report for against drizzle, bugs.debian.org/
Am Freitag, den 21.02.2014, 18:16 +0100 schrieb Agustin Martin:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:17:29PM +0100, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > Just one question: disabling auto-compat does not have any effect
> > anymore? (I think thats good, just want to ensure that this was
> > in
Package: wnpp
Control: retitle -1 ITA: log4cxx -- A logging library for C++
Control: owner -1 !
I'm intending to adopt the package as it is a r-depends of one of my
packages.
(However, I assume that this endavour will take a little longer until
ready, please feel free to nevertheless make QA upl
Package: lcms
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear maintainer,
please see the attached watchfile.
Note, that this one will only find the lcms-1.xx releases, not the lcms2 ones
(which are in a seperate package)
Best regards,
Tobias Frost
- -- System
important)
the transistion?
(BTW, I'm working on a NMU on this package; when I started working on it
I did see that bug and it would be a pitty to throw it away ...)
- --
Tobias Frost
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'
Package: lcms
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
I just wrote a dep5 copyright file (and then realizing that File-Excluded for
file removals is not yet active in uscan).
Would be a pitty to throw it way, so attaching it as patch
(its without the F
Package: liblcms1
Tags: +patch
Followup-For: Bug #728208
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
I analyzed the bugfix [1] upstream applied to fix this CVE in lcms-2, and
backported
the fix.
The code diverged very much and some of the issues are not in lcms1, therefore
the
is the p
s/CVE-2013-4276.patch#
- --
Tobias Frost
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.13-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_C
emove non-dfsg free color profiles. This is
necessary as the resulting lintian error
license-problem-md5sum-non-free-file would lead to an autoreject
(Closes: #736806).
* Fix CVE-2013-4160 by backporting the fix from lcms-2 (Closes:
#728208)
-- Tobias Frost Thu, 27 Mar 2014 12:20:
cense-problem-md5sum-non-free-file would lead to an autoreject
+(Closes: #736806).
+ * Fix CVE-2013-4160 by backporting the fix from lcms-2 (Closes: #728208)
+
+ -- Tobias Frost Thu, 27 Mar 2014 12:20:24 +0100
+
lcms (1.19.dfsg-1.2) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
Binary
#
>Dear spellchecking dictionaries and wordlists maintainers,
>
>There were some recent changes in the system that may be interesting
>for your package, after initial work by Andreas Beckmann and Tobias
>Frost. Read below some reasons to consider upgrading your package
Package: ksshaskpass
Followup-For: Bug #528051
Control: fixed -1 0.5.3-1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
According to the changelog [1] this bug has been fixed in
upstream version 0.5.3
[1] http://kde-apps.org/content/show.php/show.php?content=50971
- -- System Information:
Deb
Package: fl-cow
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Thanks for considering packaging the upstream release 0.10
- --
Tobi
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreig
Package: fl-cow
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear maintainer,
please include the attached watchfile.
Best regards,
- --
Tobi
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture:
Package: fl-cow
Version: 0.6-4.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear maintainer,
please see the attached manpage for /usr/bin/cow.
Maybe you want to include it in your next upload.
Best regards,
- --
Tobi
- -- System Information:
Debian Release:
behaviour. The patch modifies the m4 file to do not link
against this lib.
Author: Tobias Frost
Forwarded: no
Last-Update: 2014-04-25
---
This patch header follows DEP-3: http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/
--- a/m4/svrcore.m4
+++ b/m4/svrcore.m4
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@
if test -z "$svrcore_inc"
ry" Adding patch from BTS, stored as
+fix-freetype-includes.patch (Closes: #733365)
+
+ -- Tobias Frost Fri, 25 Apr 2014 19:15:30 +0200
+
drawtk (2.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Add bugfix: fix-duplicated-font.patch
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.de
10.0pt not loadable", adding texlive-fonts-recommended to B-D
+(Closes: #737413)
+
+ -- Tobias Frost Fri, 25 Apr 2014 20:11:13 +0200
+
configshell (1.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
* [9160207] Add README.source
diff -Nru configshell-1.2/debian/control configshell-1.2/debian/control
Hallo Stephen,
any news regarding wfmath? I'm currently at a BSP and would take a look
on this package...
Best regards,
Tobias Frost
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
d in BTS (Closes: #710359)
+ * debian/patches/vbox-configure-quoting.patch: fix wrong handling of paths
+with embedded quotes; this confuses vbox's configure script something
+fierce, and causes files to be missed from debian/tmp'/usr/share/doc/'
+at install time.
+
+ -- Tobias
1 - 100 of 4398 matches
Mail list logo
