On Mon, 09 Jan 2006 20:27:13 +1100
Craig Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: digitaldj
> Version: 0.7.3-1
> Followup-For: Bug #258263
>
> At least the submitter got a little futher than me!
>
> I get to where it says unable to connect to SQL server, if i click Yes
> it crashes.
>
> Runn
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:04:53 +1100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Craig Small) wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 01:08:14PM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > Did you try the new version that I mentioned in the bug-log?
> I missed that. Yes that one works.
>
> Do you need someone to sponsor y
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 07:34:31 +0200
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Tim Dijkstra (tdykstra) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > All this unasked for. A maintainer script has no business messing
> > around with peoples data!
>
> It does not. It *adds* a
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:54:24 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sjoerd Simons) wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 09:09:55PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > I wrote a patch to fix the problem described in this bug. G-v-m now
> > checks if the virtual terminal that is currently active has the sa
tags 305846 +patch
thanks
I wrote a patch to fix the problem described in this bug. G-v-m now
checks if the virtual terminal that is currently active has the same
owner as itself.
I just noticed there's a new upstream version in experimental, this is
against 1.2.0-2 though. I haven't send this up
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 13:19:44 +0100
Marvin Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: uswsusp
> Version: 0.3~cvs20060928-6
> Severity: important
>
> Hi,
>
> I upgradet uswsusp to newest version and always get following error when
> resuming the system:
>
> - 8< - 8< - 8< - 8< -
> Fatal: cannot
severiy 404344 normal
retitle 404344 Need script to invalidate suspended image during normal boot-up
thanks
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 20:23:23 +0100
Zoran Dzelajlija <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: uswsusp
> Version: 0.3~cvs20060928-6
> Severity: critical
> Justification: causes serious data loss
Hi,
I wonder why this trivial two year old bug is not fixed
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=297741
And without comment in the BTS.
This will break any package that tries to use libtool to statically
link glib-2.0.
I'm planning to upload one, but now I have to kludge around it
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:29:50 +0100
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2007, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > I would want to know
> > your thoughts on this.
>
> I had a look twice alread
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:29:50 +0100
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2007, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > I would want to know
> > your thoughts on this.
>
> I had a look twice alread
tags 297741 +patch
thanks
On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 01:19:51 +0100
Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Although the debs in experimental have the same issue, I just compiled
> glib2.0-dev myself (on a etch system) and there strangely enough,
> the .la file comes out just fin
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 17:02:05 +0800
LI Daobing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: uswsusp
> Version: 0.5-1
> Severity: important
>
> maybe you should conflict with low version of initramfs-tools
>
> update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.18-3-amd64
> /usr/sbin/mkinitramfs: line 68:
Hi,
I took a dive in the code, and fixed the problem myself. The problem
is indeed what I expected. DBus has its own user database caching, which
can't be flushed. If the network (and with it libnss-ldap) is
enabled after dbus, dbus has wrong data in its cache.
I fixed dbus now so that it flushes
tags 370569 +patch
thanks
Patch added.Index: configure.in
===
RCS file: /cvs/dbus/dbus/configure.in,v
retrieving revision 1.199
diff -u -r1.199 configure.in
--- configure.in 10 Nov 2006 02:48:46 - 1.199
+++ configure.in 9 Dec 2006
tags 402365 +wontfix
thanks
On Sat, 09 Dec 2006 22:22:44 +0100
Andreas Mainik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: uswsusp
> Version: 0.3~cvs20060928-4
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
>
> Please insert my machine in the whitelist.
>
> s2ram -f works fine for me. The workarounds are not nee
retitle 403036 Only warn on install for missing kernel support
thanks
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:24:21 +0100
Guus Sliepen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: uswsusp
> Version: 0.3~cvs20060928-6
> Severity: normal
>
> When I upgrade the uswsusp package, I get a debconf warning that I don't
> have
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:11:21 +0100
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 12:19:35PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > No, I don't remember having encountered this problem, but the information
> > provided by others looks convincing.
> >
> > I would apply the patch, c
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 00:33:58 +0100
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > What worry me about the patch is the fact that create_lock() and
> > > check_dpkglock() are not performed in the same order. In particular, if
> > > create_lock() fail we exit with error 0 instead of 1 thus maybe
>
On Sun, 03 Dec 2006 21:29:17 -0800
Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 11:33:37PM +0100, Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> was heard to say:
> > On Sat, 02 Dec 2006 20:04:37 -0800
> > Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 02 Dec 2006 19:56:58 -0800
Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: uswsusp
> Version: 0.3~cvs20060928-4
> Severity: normal
>
> A fresh install of uswsusp gives me a dialog stating that the swap
> partition in the configuration file does not exist, and asking if I
> want to
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 21:54:16 +0100
Philip Frei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is the output from the steps you told me:
>
> dpkg-reconfigure uswsusp
> Generating RSA key, this may take a while ...
> libgcrypt version: 1.2.3
> Key bits (between 1024 and 4096 inclusive) [1024]: Generatin
On Sat, 02 Dec 2006 20:04:37 -0800
Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: uswsusp
> Version: 0.3~cvs20060928-4
> Severity: serious
>
> uswsusp fails to configure regardless of whether I tell it to ignore
> my existing non-existant swap file.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo dpkg -i
Op Tue, 5 Dec 2006 09:52:15 +0100
schreef Philip Frei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, 3 Dec 2006 23:36:12 +0100
> Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > And you are sure the keyfile isn't there? What happens if you run
> > suspend-keygen by hand?
>
If a rc bug hunter sees this and wants to beat my regular sponsor to
it. You can find a new package at
http://www.famdijkstra.org/~tdykstra/debian/uswsusp
TIA,
Tim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:30:55 +0100
Philip Frei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The tools didn't asked for either key bits or password but also didn't
> continue until I entered something - have a look at line 55 and 143
> This is the full output - I didn't any "write" messages.
>
> I tried it again
retitle 401102 suspend-keygen fails with a lot of bits (>~ 3500)
thanks
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 22:23:26 +0100
Philip Frei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I figured out that I could create keys with suspend-keygen up to 3986
> bits. But with higher bit rate it fails.
> I attached a strace output from a
bts close 397212
thanks
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 12:10:11 -0800
Vagrant Cascadian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: uswsusp
> Version: 0.3~cvs20060928-4
> Followup-For: Bug #397212
>
> using the instructions from cryptsetup's README.initramfs.gz, i was able
> to use the decrypt derived keyscript
tags 402493 +confirmed
thanks
Vagrant:
>
> after using s2disk, and failing to resume from the swap partition, the
> swap signature on the swap partition needs to be re-created with mkswap.
>
> while swap partitions don't typically store important data, it's kind of
> annoying to hae to manually r
On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 04:00:20 +0100
Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: uswsusp
> Version: 0.3~cvs20060928-6
> Severity: wishlist
>
> There is a new upstream release 0.5 available at suspend.sf.net.
> I've been using it successfully for some time now.
> Maybe an official 0.5 releas
On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 16:10:11 +0100
Philip Frei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: uswsusp
> Version: 0.3~cvs20060928-6
> Severity: important
>
> About every second time I can't suspend my notebook. The suspend process
> starts but just after 2 seconds it aborts.
> This only happens with encry
severity 405388 normal
tags 405488 +confirmed
found 0.3~cvs20060928-1
thanks
On Wed, 03 Jan 2007 06:06:36 +0100
gregor herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: uswsusp
> Version: 16
> Severity: minor
>
> I just set up encryption for s2disk (with an RSA file).
> It took me some time to find
Package: mount
Version: 2.12r-15
Severity: whishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
In the util-linux source package there is a file called
debian/patches/30swsusp-resume.dpatch
It is however not applied, is there any reason to not apply it?
I couldn't find a reason in the changelog, the only mention
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:35:04 +0100
Philip Frei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:57:53 +0100
> Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Any error messages? If it went to quick, I think you can see some more
> > by going to the first free
block 405388 by 337663
thanks
Hi,
This is just to let you know that I had an e-mail conversation with the
maintainers of initramfs-tools and cryptsetup (which has the same
problem, but fixed it for that package). The initramfs maintainer
agreed to fix this post-etch.
grts Tim
signature.asc
Des
ile themselves).
>
> or just setting it in /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/keymap or in
> /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf.
>
> this code is good tested by uswsusp, but it's a feature enhancement.
> i'll queue it up for the post-etch queue.
Tested by cryptroot. But
Hi,
If this file, /etc/directfbrc, is essential we should install it
on the initramfs.
grts Tim
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:33:42 +0100
Philip Frei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 22:59:07 +0100
> Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Can you just try
> >
> > s2disk
>
> It seems to work fine with s2disk. I tried it s
On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 10:57:11 +0100
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 02:15:20PM +0100, Tim Dijkstra (tdykstra) wrote:
> > Package: menu
> > Version: Patch to just fork and die, instead of waiting on a signal
> > Followup-For: Bug #374
Op Sun, 26 Nov 2006 15:59:02 +0100
schreef Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Package: uswsusp
> Version: 0.3~cvs20060928-3
> Severity: minor
>
> suspend and resume works fine with uswsusp. Still I get the following
> error messages:
>
> suspend: pm_ops->prepare returned error -1
> suspend: Sn
Op Mon, 27 Nov 2006 10:42:25 +0200
schreef Ratiu Petru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Package: uswsusp
> Version: 0.3~cvs20060928-3
> Severity: normal
>
>
> At first, i thought it's the same as #397667 , however I'm using a
> "straight" Debian installation and i have both initscripts
> (2.86.ds1-35) and
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:16:52 +0100
Philip Frei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: uswsusp
> Version: 0.3~cvs20060928-4
> Severity: normal
>
> Some problems occured during configuration (dpkg-reconfigure):
>
> - RSA key bits:
> This dialog only accepts key up to 4094 bits. It doesn't continue
On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 18:28:13 +0100
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 02:13:04PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think this related to the following bug report to libc. Symptoms are
> > really the same apart from the fact that up
On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 12:42:40 +0100
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Vagrant Cascadian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Package: uswsusp
> > Version: 0.3~cvs20060928-2
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: Policy 10.7.3
> >
> > i had locally modified my /etc/uswsusp.conf to use a diffe
On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 19:00:28 +0100
Bernard Adrian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: uswsusp
> Version: 0.3~cvs20060928-2
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> I can't configure uswsusp : debconf says "No swap partition found,
> userspace software suspend will not work". However, there is a running
On Sun, 5 Nov 2006 12:20:55 -0800
Vagrant Cascadian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: uswsusp
> Version: 0.3~cvs20060928-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> when i tried to use s2disk, it wouldn't work, because the swap partition
> is encrypted.
>
> so then i configured it to use an un-used swap part
Hi Steve,
You wrote in the 396640 bug log:
> Indeed, libpci.a now depends on libz, but pciutils-dev doesn't have a
> dependency reflecting this -- nor, for that matter, is there any facility in
> pciutils-dev that lets consumers of this library know what other libs one
> needs to link against! S
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:46:44 +0100
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was just bug-hunting. I don't know what the reason was why the device
> was unavailable, but I think there may be valid setups where this is the
> case.
I just read in another report by Vagrant that he was trying to
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 16:44:40 +0100
Bernard Adrian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>
> > Could you please send the result of:
> >
> > cat /proc/swaps
>
>
> ,[ cat /proc/swaps ]
> | Filename
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 20:42:30 +0100
Bernard Adrian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>
> > This is totally weird... Are you sure you had /proc mounted and swap
> > activated when you configured uswsusp?
>
> > And wh
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 21:54:01 +0100
Bernard Adrian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>
> > Hmm, that is the problem. /bin/mountpoint is in the initscripts package
> > which has priority 'required'. Apparently you
tags 397214 -patch
thanks
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 23:16:03 + (GMT)
Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For more detail, what actually happens is that the config file is
> regenerated on upgrade from the original debconf questions.
This is not true. It is regenerated from what is in the
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 10:37:38 + (GMT)
Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Nov 2006, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
>
> The postinst that I have (0.3~cvs20060928-2) does:
>
> # If we didn't got a value, we want the hardcoded default,
> # so del
&g
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:26:02 -0500
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: uswsusp
> Version: 0.3~cvs20060928-2
> Severity: normal
> Tags: d-i
>
> The definition of what's acceptable to be asked at high priority is
> questions that do not have a reasonable default. I think that not using
Package: viewcvs
Version: 0.9.2+cvs.1.0.dev.2003.08.26-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch,l10n
This is the new po-debconf template translation in Dutch.
Greetings Tim Dijkstra#
#Translators, if you are not familiar with the PO format, gettext
#documentation is worth reading, especially
I just remembered that I have '-u spamd' in the option lists, that means
spamd will drop privileges and run as spamd. Removing that restores
correct behaviour.
grts Tim
pgpcR6X8nTg3z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 06:42:47 +0100
Georg Wittenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: splashy
> Version: 0.3.0
> Severity: important
>
>
> Hi!
>
> After upgrading to splashy 0.3, the splash screen is only shown on
> shutdown but not when booting. Quite early in the boot process, just
> afte
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 22:07:23 +0100
Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: splashy
> Version: 0.3.0
> Severity: normal
>
> I'm using splashy with
> ENABLE_INITRAMFS=1
> and uswsusp. When I suspend to disk, the subsequent resume fails (the splash
> screen hangs and I have to hard res
Hi,
> Not sure whether this is related, but during the upgrade to splashy 0.3 the
> same error is triggered and after the upgrade /lib/splashy still contains the
> some files as mentioned in this bug report.
That directory will now be removed on removal of 0.3.0, it is done in
its prerm. Hmm, m
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 18:19:59 +0100
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: uswsusp
> Version: 0.3~cvs20060928-6
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hello Tim,
>
> With etch-amd64 on my new laptop, s2ram work fine with that option:
>
> #s2ram -f -a 1
>
> Here the laptop ID:
>
> #This machine
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:52:07 +0100
Georg Wittenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Tim!
>
> On Monday 12 February 2007 15:19, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 06:42:47 +0100
> > Georg Wittenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Package: s
Hi Guys,
I just got this report
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 18:19:59 +0100
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: uswsusp
> Version: 0.3~cvs20060928-6
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hello Tim,
>
> With etch-amd64 on my new laptop, s2ram work fine with that option:
>
> #s2ram -f -a 1
>
> Here
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:19:37 +0100
Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, my explanation was maybe not quite accurate. If I use the default
> theme it becomes more obvious what happens:
> On resume, init-top/splashy runs "splashy boot", which brings up the
> default splash screen.
> Later,
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:39:44 +0100
Frederic Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: splashy
> Version: 0.3.1
> Severity: important
>
> splashy 0.3.0 and 0.3.1 have calls to splashy_config in splashy-init;
> however splashy_config is linked against libglib-2.0.so.0 which is
> not available if
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:43:11 +0100
Frederic Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: splashy
> Version: 0.3.1
> Severity: minor
>
> [ "$ENABLE" = "1" ] && log_warning_message "To enable splashy add 'splash'
> to
> the kernel command line. Use of ENABLE in /etc/splashy/default is
> depre
Hi,
Your probably seeing the result of Bug#410897:
'Reads /proc/cmdline while /proc/ is not yet mounted.'
grts Tim
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:10:49 +0100
Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, still with upstart. I can confirm, if I install sysvinit, the
> bootup (at least wit splashy in initramfs) takes for ages and the
> progressbar seems to be stuck after the first 20%.
This is very good news. Now at
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 23:56:21 +0100
Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: splashy
> Version: 0.3.1
> Severity: normal
>
> /etc/init.d/splashy contains:
>
> grep -q -e '[[:space:]]splash\([[:space:]]+\|$\)' /proc/cmdline &&
> ENABLE=1
> grep -q -e '[[:space:]]nosplash\([[:space:]]+\|
Hi Wolf,
Can you check if this bug is solved in the meantime?
grts Tim
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=394896
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:37:57 -0200
Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Your probably seeing the result of Bug#410897:
> > 'Reads /proc/cmdline while /proc/ is not yet mounted.
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:35:07 -0200
Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 23:56:21 +0100
> > Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Package: splashy
> &
Hi Steve,
You downgraded this bug. That's your call. But I do think this should be
fixed for etch.
I think it is unacceptable that an upgrade of such a critical pacakage
(for systems that use it) silently fails. It would be better to have
proper support for upgrading a database with the ldbm bac
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:44:07 +0100
Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: splashy
> Version: 0.3.2
> Severity: normal
>
> Pressing the backspace key while running suspend to disk (uswsusp)
> allows you to abort the process.
> When uswsusp is configured to use splashy, this doesn't wo
On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 23:24:37 -0500
Francois Marier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: uswsusp
> Version: 0.6~cvs20070202-1
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
> I have submitted this information upstream, but I'm including it here in case
> you're interested
> in adding this machine to the s2r
severity 404316 important
thanks
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 11:33:28 +0100
Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm experiencing the same problem as mentioned in this bug for a few
> weeks. Originally I thought I had a kernel problem, but I finally found
> some time to test different kernels just
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 13:48:54 +0100
Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tracked the problem down some. It works nicely IF I make sure my
> initrd is updated. Given that I do not run the newest kernel image on my
> system (because that 2.6.20 version I tested sometimes froze the system
> af
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 00:27:27 +0100
Franklin PIAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: uswsusp
> Followup-For: Bug #411727
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Thank you for the fix you have submitted. Laptop users (including me) will be
> happy to
> have hibernation working out of the box.
>
> However, (sorry
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 06:56:22 -0600
Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 09:58:43 -0600
> Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > s2disk does not mark (software) raid arrays as clean when shutting
> > down the machine.
>
> I've managed to ge
Hi Rodrigo
I know it is not nice to do this via BTS, but at least I know you read
that. When I send you a message, I get this back:
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permane
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 09:28:41 -0600
Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 03:24:08PM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 06:56:22 -0600
> > Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 10:55:30 +0200
Franklin PIAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The release 0.3~cvs20060928-7 works :
> I think the problem i had was due to the way i manually added
> etch-proposed-updates during the installation... leading to installing
> uswsusp twice, thus the error m
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 15:53:06 -0400
Alec Berryman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: uswsusp
> Followup-For: Bug #416399
>
>
> The bug does not appear in 0.6~cvs20070202-1. If it's too late to get a
> fix into etch, would it be possible to document this in the release
> notes? I thought usws
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:50:07 +0100
Benjamin Eikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: splashy
> Version: 0.3.2
> Severity: normal
>
> I installed the splashy and splashy-themes package on my laptop, added the
> "splash" option to my boot options but splashy does not
> work. I am using a self-
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:19:51 +0100
Johannes Rohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: uswsusp
> Version: 0.6~cvs20070202-1
> Severity: normal
>
> The latest version of splashy is installed and works for normal
> boot/shutdown.
>
> However, running s2disk returns "looking for splash system... n
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 23:07:13 +0100
Benjamin Eikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: splashy
> Version: 0.3.2
> Followup-For: Bug #411473
>
> Hello again,
>
> yes I have framebuffer support compiled into my kernel (radeonfb). That was
> not the problem. The problem was that I have configured
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:47:38 +0100
Jan De Luyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: uswsusp
> Version: 0.6~cvs20070202-1
> Severity: normal
>
>
> Hello,
>
> First off, I don't know if this is a problem with the install or with
> uswusp. I just installed Debian with a Debian Etch install CD (
retitle 411727 "When installed in d-i, uswsusp creates broken uswsusp.conf with
devfs style dev-nodes"
tags 411727 +wontfix
thanks
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:24:39 +0100
Jan De Luyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 February 2007, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > On Tue, 2
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:05:03 +
Traduz ML <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: uswsusp
> Version: 0.6
> Tags: l10n, patch
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Portuguese translation for uswsusp's debconf messages.
> Translator: Pedro Ribeiro
> Feel free to use it.
>
> For translation updates please con
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 07:58:31 +0100
Johannes Rohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Montag, den 19.02.2007, 21:27 +0100 schrieb Tim Dijkstra:
> > On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:19:51 +0100
> > Johannes Rohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Do you have a custom kernel?
&
Johannes,
Could you check if you've got libdirectfb-extra installed, and if not, if
installing it (and reruning update-initramfs -u) helps?
grts Tim
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 17:34:04 -0200
Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alexander Bürger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> I think it was required because the theme you're using probably is
> >> using JPEG images. We're removing its support to use GIF and PNG
> >> only. We'll probably re
Hi,
Can you still reproduce this bug?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=350179
grts Tim
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
If slmodemd really needs a restart on resume (instead of some bug in
the driver or so), this is a perfect case for pm-utils. By dropping
a small script in the appropriate dir it will restart slmodemd for
you. pm-utils is not in debian yet, so you'll have to wait a bit...
grts Tim
signature.
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:27:57 +0100
Franklin PIAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I recently tested Etch on a few laptops and I noticed the uswsusp
> resume_device was always
> set to long device (devfs like) names.
>
> I first assumed It was a well known bug for Etch installation, but it doesn't
>
severity 411727 grave
thanks
This makes all installations of uswsusp on i386 and amd64 laptops with
debian-installer unusable.
grts Tim
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:27:57 +0100
Franklin PIAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - add a hook in the current package, in order to detect that we're in D-I,
> then use di's mapdevfs.
Unfortunately mapdevfs is available in the d-i environment. Packages
are however installed in a chroot under /target
For reference, an updated package can be found at :
http://www.famdijkstra.org/~tdykstra/debian/uswsusp/uswsusp_0.3~cvs20060928-7_i386.changes
grts Tim
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
[ I'm adding the mdadm maitainer to the CC-list, maybe he has some
useful comments. ]
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 09:58:43 -0600
Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: uswsusp
> Version: 0.6~cvs20070202-1
> Severity: important
>
> s2disk does not mark (software) raid arrays as
tags 414668 +moreinfo
thanks
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 08:09:11 +0100
Gijs Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Installed Splashy last week. Since then, when booting not all scripts
> in rc2.d are started, at least not at every boot (eg anacron, cron,
> and more).
>
> Removed splashy from grub/menu.
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:37:53 -0500
Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 12:47:49AM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> > Neil Brown wrote:
> > > On Tuesday April 3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > []
> > >> After the power cycle the kernel boots, devices are di
Hi Luis,
According to one of the raid developers we can force raid to start readonly.
That will probably fix our problem. Can you please try the attached patch?
TIA,
Tim
--- /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/local-top/mdrun 2006-09-01 22:14:25.0 +0200
+++ /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scr
1 - 100 of 276 matches
Mail list logo
