ing the kernel-image package.
Na, i believe the easiest way is doing :
dpkg-reconfigure kernel-image-2.6.11-
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
we can happily close this bug report :)
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
id experimental glibc
version to support powerpc biarch ? I installed the ubuntu biarch toolchain in
a sarge chroot, and built ppc64 kernels there, but it would be nice to have an
official debian/experimental toolchain able to do that too, and move it to sid
as soon as possible even.
Friendly,
Sv
sn't have any
> devices that end with "/disc", so you might as well just test for that
> unconditionally.
Ok, thanks will apply. Need to package 1.6.22 too anyway.
BTW, it would be nice to upload ubuntu's gparted to debian too.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 04:59:19PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 05:34:28PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 03:44:08PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > I suggest the attached patch. The _have_devfs() test is basically
> > >
an ask if Michael Vogt can sponsor
> the next upload.
If you want, i can do it, which makes sense as i am the parted maintainer, and
also active in parted upstream too.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
added benefit of
allowing to inform the user about the little description of the different
choices, pasted directly from yaboot's boot.msg file (but removing the
obviously not-needed power3/4 entries).
Again, apologies for the lateness of this report, and i hope it is not too
late.
Friendly,
our users", I agree, but the timing of this report
> has been very unfortunate.
So what ? What happened to we will release when we are ready ? And is really
one day more or less or even a week going to be a problem ? Especially given
the legal consequences it can bring to our users and distributors ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Package: kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.8
Severity: important
Hi Simon,
As discussed on irc, i am now filling a bug report for this issue.
The kernel-build packages should contain the flavour specific headers, and
have symlink to the common headers found in kernel-headers.
Right now, probably becaus
a .deb)
No, since providing such a .diff result in distributing the undistributable
firmware. Juste use the prune script,
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 11:36:28AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > This needs to be fixed for sarge, as it will subject random underage people
> > sitting in the same room your computer is in to random porn. I believe th=
> > is is illegal in most countries, an
Defaulting to no. I guess the omlet.vim can go into
/usr/share/ocaml-tools amd a symlink be installed if the user respond yes to
the question.
The fact that this is a medium priority question will make it show up only in
expert mode, and it will default to your proposed behavior in high priority
mo
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 11:26:52AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 10:52:02AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > What about a medium-priority debconf question asking if you want to have
> > omlet
> > or not ? Defaulting to no. I guess the omlet.vim
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 07:20:01PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 05:36:31PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > The partman interface correctly marks the partition i created as prep, and
> > also correctly sets the prep flag on the partition table, but
welcomed.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mpression from upstream that they
didn't plan to support amd6464bit kernels, altough there is 0.9. out, i
believe.
I will look at this next week.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: ftp.debian.org
Hello,
As it seems completely unlikely that at this stage we are going to update the
sarge kernel to 2.6.10, and since 2.6.11 is available and should be used, i am
asking for the removal of the powerpc 2.6.10 kernel.
Thanks for handling this,
Friendly,
Sven Luther
thus safely be removed, as 2.6.10 kernel-source is
unmaintained.
sparc will soon join this group, and it will leave us only hppa and alpha
before 2.6.10 can be gone for good.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
itrd-tools upload, or at least
in the unstable version.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
d topic, have you also noticed some occasional
freeze-on-wake with the current ubuntu kernel on your powerbook ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> kernel-image-2.4.26-sparc64.
>
> Could you be a little more specific about the mode of failure?
> Does the same problem manifest with 2.6.9 or 2.6.7?
I believe that the permedia2 fbdev was never really adapted to the 2.6 fbdev
infrastructure. I may be wrong though.
Friendly,
Sven Lut
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 07:39:04PM +0100, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le jeudi 30 décembre 2004 à 11:38 +0100, Sven Luther a écrit :
> > Package: nautilus
> > Version: 2.8.2-2
> > Severity: normal
> >
> >
> > I use a dual head setup, using radeon'
reup the severity, but i don't think it
acceptable to ship sarge with a package that can easily make the system crawl
to unusability.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 04:15:24PM -0800, David Schleef wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 11:32:30PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Hello David,
Thanks for CCing me on the bug report :)
> > I understand you gave the free hand on upping the severity in a previous
> > ma
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 10:48:15AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 04:15:24PM -0800, David Schleef wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 11:32:30PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Hello David,
>
> Thanks for CCing me on the bug report :)
>
> >
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 04:50:15PM +0100, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le jeudi 12 août 2004 à 08:47 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit :
> > Package: nautilus
> > Version: 2.6.3b-3
> > Severity: minor
> >
> >
> > As said, in gnome 2.4, nautilus offered to umount an
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 03:21:04PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 04:15:18PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 03:00:04PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > When you're using a system running udev with the devfs compatibility
>
that partition previously
a Plan 9 partition or something ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 12:42:04PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 07:35:03AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 03:21:04PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 04:15:18PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > >
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 12:42:04PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 07:35:03AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 03:21:04PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 04:15:18PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > >
may have fixed it since it it touches the
above .diff, no build has been attempted since then, and it is almost a month
now.
This problem may be known already, i just file it here for documentation
purpose, and in case you were not aware of it, which i doubt.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-- System Inf
ene, are you sure the disk actually had a partition
table, and if so, what was it ? Also, could you see what the kernel has to say
about it, by going to console 2, and looking at /proc/partitions.
Also, what parted has to say about it directly too. Go to console 2 and type
parted, and then print, copy
that just in case. Will do.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/etc/kernel/postinst.d/$version";
}
In all three postinst, prerm and postrm scripts. I am not perl fluent, so i
hope the above is indeed correct.
If you could handle this quickly, i want to use this feature in the powerpc
kernel packages, which need to be included in sarge, so it is a
> once it was created.
>
> The issue seems to be GB is sometimes described as 2^10 and sometimes it's
> 2^2.
Is this with the real parted (as launched from the shell in console 2), or
using the partman tool ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
reassign 307220 partman
thanks
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 09:10:26PM -0400, Jason Boxman wrote:
> On Sunday 01 May 2005 19:45, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > Is this with the real parted (as launched from the shell in console 2), or
> > using the partman tool ?
>
> This is u
as the kernel maintainer team,
so ...
No off to the airport, see you in two days or so ...
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
l, ok yes it is
frozen.
Doens't change a thing as regard to parted though, as it was frozen in august.
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 08:22:26AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 10:15:29PM +0100, Nikolaus Schulz wrote:
> > > Sven Luther wrote:
> > > >
malzings patch from bug #275650 was
> incomplete and incorrect.
Ok.
> On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 05:30:58PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > now Sarge's frozen (whoohoo!) and it's time to fix remaining issues with
> > > packages in Sarge. What about picking up t
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 12:05:56PM +0200, Nikolaus Schulz wrote:
> Hi Sven,
>
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > Doens't change a thing as regard to parted though, as it was frozen in
> > > > august.
> > >
> > > Ah. I guess it's part of
g from upstream.
Nikolaus, why you don't just become a member of the parted alioth project, and
check this stuff in there ?
Also, please make sure you propose your stuff to Guillaume if you feel it is
worth of upstream development.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
missing approx user.
Also, i am wondering if we could not simply reuse the /var/cache/apt archive.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gt;
> Well, in fact it was a real problem: there are too many dependencies for
> lablgtk2 which are not necessary for most users. I had made a split
> version of the package. Maybe I could update it and upload it (it has to
> go through NEW queue) or is post-sarge better?
Sarge is frozen
this a RC, but as we are so late in the game, i keep it as
important and let it up to you. Having firewire webcams and DV digicams
working out of the box in debian/sarge would be a nice thing though.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-- Package-specific info:
-- /etc/udev/rules.d/:
/etc/udev/rules.d/:
to
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 10:57:25PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On May 07, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > In the meantime, it would be nice to have those devices added per default in
> > links.conf, and the correct permissions set in permissions.rules.
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 11:17:07PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On May 07, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Sure i did read it, it is still a shame that firewire webcam support will
> > not
> > work out of the box with udev because of that.
a trend to kill debian for the most users.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 12:03:21AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On May 07, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Debian's udev sucks because it is not able to add the workaroud to make
> > firewire cameras work out of the box.
> This is not an udev bug,
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 12:03:21AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On May 07, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Debian's udev sucks because it is not able to add the workaroud to make
> > firewire cameras work out of the box.
> This is not an udev bug,
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 11:31:46AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On May 08, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > So, why did ubuntu chose to fix it that way ?
> They obviously have a different opinion about the tradeoffs.
Yep, they obviously care about their
signaled the nautilus device
bar to stop using the device.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-powerpc
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (c
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 03:56:34PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-03-14 at 11:13 +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 10:16:20AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > > * Aurélien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-14 10:56]:
> >
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 06:33:36PM +0100, Nikolaus Schulz wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 03:04:30AM +0100, Nikolaus Schulz wrote:
> > > the patches in debian/patches are sh scripts.
> > > Running "checkbashisms debia
will update this in svn, altough parted is currently in sarge freeze, so
i need to check a couple other bits before i upload the current svn head.
Friendly,
Sven LUther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
kernel is 2.6.8-powerpc from "sarge rc2" as supplied from Debian.
> I've tried the stable 2.6.11.3 that was released from kernel.org 13
> March 2005. With that kernel and essentially the same configuration
> (make oldconfig, accepting default choices for new options), the s
> this process a few times with the same results.
Can you upgrade your run-parts (or whatever package contains it) to the
version currently in testing ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
information i had was that the sound driver for the mac mini
was not yet developed but work was underway.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and we
would need your lspci and lspci -n output to fix this.
Also, maybe it would have been best if you had provided a installation-report
but against debian-installer for such stuff instead.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 06:10:19PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> At 9:28 PM +0100 3/15/05, Sven Luther wrote:
> >...
> >Can you upgrade your run-parts (or whatever package contains it) to the
> >version currently in testing ?
>
> After I upgraded the package debi
he -v option (but it
does understand the --verbose one).
Since this is could cause problems in woody->sarge migration, it would be nice
to fix it before the release, or let's say early enough that i can rebuild
both powerpc kernels with it.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-- System Information:
Debian
so we can't really do kernel or installer tests), we don't
have those ppc64 machine IBM mentioned could be made available, which makes
work on the kernel and installer part at least less possible.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rchitecture.
> Having "ppc" and "ppc64" would be fine, as would having "powerpc" and
> "powerpc64". Having "powerpc" and "ppc64" is inconsistent.
Notice that powerpc used to be called ppc back then (98ish or something such),
and that the name got changed to powerpc64.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rent as pure dogma, despite the cost
involved ?
> Obviously I have no power to overrule you on your choice of architecture
> name, but I'd like to try and appeal to some common sense in you, if
> there is any.
Hehe.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 12:21:51PM +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 11:37:36AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 10:36:07AM +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
> > > Package: parted
> > > Version: 1.6.21-1
> > > Severity: important
>
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 02:18:59PM +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 12:41:39PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 12:21:51PM +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 11:37:36AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > On T
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 08:10:36PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 01:14:04AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > I just got a bug report against my powerpc kernels which use as you
> > know the /etc/kernel/*.d scripts, and an installation of this kernels
> &
wrong?
Don't know once is a coincidence, but 3 times is a problem, which i believe is
RC. We should fill a bug, but i don't know what package to fill it at, let's
say the installer for now.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
merge 279030 299722
thanks
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 06:30:33AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 10:23:17PM +0100, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> > Hello,
> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 10:09:27PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 08:4
tall pre-reboot is rather nice and
solves this problem.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2) it checks if we come straigth from d-i (or are upgrading from woody, or
in any other way require a reboot).
3) Inform the user that a reboot is needed in order for it to work.
I guess udev may already do some of the above, i remember a note about this,
but we have to make sure it is shown in the debian-installer path.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 09:19:59AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 10:10:55PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 08:10:36PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > To elaborate a bit, the reason why this affects users upgrading from
> > >
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 02:38:35AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 10:36:12AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > On Mar 18, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > 3) Inform the user that a reboot is needed in order for it to work.
>
tituted into the archive and can confirm that the
> problem
> is resolved by this combination
He, nice, since my own test failed, due to unstable/powerpc brokage today :/
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 03:16:47PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 04:12:59PM +0200, Jonathan Quick wrote:
> > On Mar 18, Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >On Mar 18, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 02:58:06PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 12:18:10PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 02:38:35AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 10:36:12AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> &g
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 06:10:19PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> At 9:28 PM +0100 3/15/05, Sven Luther wrote:
> >...
> >Can you upgrade your run-parts (or whatever package contains it) to the
> >version currently in testing ?
>
> After I upgraded the package debi
46x: Thermostat bus: 1, address: 0x2e, limit_adjust: 0, fan_speed:-1
> adt746x: ADT7467 initializing
> adt746x: Lowering max temperatures from 69, 92, 101 to 70, 50, 70
>
> '70, 50, 70' looks buggy.
Please try the 2.6.11 kernels at :
http://people.debian.org/~luther/powerpc/2.6.11
and confirm if the problem persists or not.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
same. I also cannot set the hwclock (--systohc).
Can you try the 2.6.11 kernels from :
http://people.debian.org/~luther/powerpc/2.6.11
And confirm that this problem is still present there or not ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
;
> The diffs:
> http://home.elka.pw.edu.pl/~mszyprow/programy/asfs/asfs-1.0b8_to_1.0b9_patch_2.6.10.diff.gz
> http://home.elka.pw.edu.pl/~mszyprow/programy/asfs/asfs-1.0b9_patch_2.6.10.diff.gz
How goes your effort to bring this upstream ? Would be nice if you where to
give it another try.
F
add to ocaml-base-nox
> postinst?
Mmm, will think of it, and we will see in a next upload.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ocaml-base-3.08 but it is not installable
>
> indeed:
>
> # apt-cache show liblablgl-ocaml
> Depends: ocaml-base-3.08, ...
>
> which is not available any more.
Come one guys, we are in ocaml 3.08 -> 3.08.3 migration, which will take a
week or two. Please don't upgrade
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
As subject says, this package is superceded by the 3.08.3-3 package in sid, so
no need to keep the experimental version around.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
K
nd-of-lines will be translated from
> .B \n
> to
> .B \r\n
>
> Thanks.
I am not sure about this, what was the intention ? to show \n qnd \r ? if so
we need to somehow escape that, but this is not allowed :/
Can you maybe provide a patch or ask Xavier ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
ke this dispute here again.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ting such random breakages of unstable, just run
testing :)
Closing this bug which is not really a bug but a feature.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 09:10:57AM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 08:39:04AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 12:56:42AM +0100, Bas Kloet wrote:
> > > Package: liblablgtk2-ocaml
> > > Version: 2.4.0+2004.11.19-3
> > >
fabbionne to test it first on ubuntu, we don't use 4.0 yet, but
they do, and we will see what happens with it. I would wait fro debian until
we move to 4.0 for this kind of stuff, if Xavier doesn't fix it first.
Did Xavier or someone from the ocaml team comment on that patch ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
range bug report
about this, so, let's stay as close to possible to the upstream stuff.
Now, the best way for sucha function would be to be added to some of the
external libs, no ? Something like extlib maintained by stefano if i am not
wrong. Or do you really need to be patched against oca
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 11:59:05AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 07:40:37 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 03:55:49AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > Sven,
> > >
> > > a patch to fix this build issue
tigate and fix with upstream next week once i am back home.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
future
versions, but nobody that i know of has started on this yet. Please subscribe
to the upstream parted mailing lists in the parted gnu/savannah project, and
ask your question there. Also, patches are welcomed :)
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a sub
know what kernel version numbers, and if they where
self built or whatever, you did try previously and if you saw or not said
problem.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
entered the archive. This
is only needed on 32bit kernels. This does only work however for kernels
including the right patch, which is only available since debian kernel
2.6.12. It will just work without generating those files if this patch is
not present though.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
needs a rebuild, i will do so next week when i am home again, or
someone can do this in the meantime.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Severity set to `serious'.
Bah, let' s just disable the native code compilation for i386 for now, and
until this problem is solved, i have already forwarded a bug report about this
to upstream, but have gotten zero reply thus far, so maybe this will move them
a bit :)
Friendly,
Sven Luth
trully baffled.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-powerpc
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
ased.
I will not do this mistake again, and maybe it is a feature, but i don't think
so, not sure though.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-powerp
est the build for ppc and ia64 that would be
> great.
I can do a 2.6.11 or 2.6.8 build later today, but as it only seems to affect
ppc64, i am not sure of the relevance of a ppc32 build.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 08:41:08PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 12:46:53PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 06:41:45PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > tag 30235 +pending
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
&
o move out
> of the country. so things are a little crazy... i'll be going to
> california for a few weeks first, but i have to pack for the
> move before i go.
This definitively sounds like a gcc-4.0 thingy, at least for the warnings. Not
sure about the asm-m68k stuff though, and i w
301 - 400 of 1356 matches
Mail list logo
