of this.
> Please change the Build-Depends to 'libmysqlclient12-dev' in debian/control.
Or libmysqlclient14-dev, which is the version that upstream currently
recommends.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: gsnes9x
Version: 3.12-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The gsnes9x package has been built on all release architectures, and is
present in testing; however, it depends on snes9x-x, which is only available
on i386, m68k, mips, and powerpc. I did try to build snes9x
tags 305414 patch
thanks
I've prepared an NMU for this issue which will be uploaded shortly. The
diff (changelog entry, plus config.guess/config.sub updates that were pulled
in) is attached.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
diff -u libgnomemm2.6-2.8.0/scripts/config.
build
> dh_testdir
> # Add here commands to configure the package.
> xmkmf
> make: xmkmf: Command not found
> make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 127
> The new version in sid fixes this by adding the missing Build-Depends
> on xutils in debian/control.
Non-free package, needs manual
> make: dh_testdir: Command not found
> make: *** [clean] Error 127
> The newer version in sid does not have this problem.
Non-free package, needs builds on arm and s390 to get the update into
testing. Volunteers?
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
right thing
> to tag it as unreproducible and lower the severity? If not, I would
> take other suggestions on how to fix it.
It's certainly not unreproducible. One of the release assistants also
followed up to this bug noting that he had seen the problem; and the
underlying cause
is package, I'm not
really willing to do the work behind sponsoring a new upstream version of
it. If you could prepare a 0.26-4 version that fixes this particular bug,
I'd be happy to sponsor that.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: snes9express
Version: 1.42-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The snes9express package has been built on all release architectures, and is
present in testing; however, it depends on snes9x-x, which is only available
on i386, m68k, mips, and powerpc. I did try to bu
work
However, this is an error in a version of the package that no longer exists
in the Debian archive. It is therefore not release-critical.
It would be reasonable for frozen-bubble-data to provide a postrm script
which handles the 'failed-upgrade' case from 1.0.0-6 in order to fix this
bug.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
s versions of
doxygen.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
er.
> aborting...
> zsh: abort magnifier
Where did you get this version of gnome-mag? You seem to be severale
versions behind anything that Debian currently ships. Can you please
upgrade to the current version and see if that fixes your problem?
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmod
still have this problem on your
system, or has it been fixed some time in the past 5 months?
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ib/ldap, a
directory owned by the slapd server), I don't believe this bug should be RC.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tinst
> script?
Does this bug apply to new installs of culmus, or only to upgrades? If it
doesn't affect new installs, then it should not be RC since there is no
previous stable version of culmus.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ave snes9x-x.
> thanks,
Yes, you will want to file a bug report against ftp.debian.org requesting
removal of the binaries, once the fix is uploaded.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
mysqlclient14-dev (>= 4.1.11). Is there a reason this build-dep needs to
be versioned?
A minor issue, in any case; the package is building now and should be
uploaded soon.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
x27;.
Eh, this bug is an RC bug about the fact that amule as currently linked in
Debian is not distributable because of a GPL/OpenSSL license conflict. This
is amule's bug, not libcurl's. If you want to file a wishlist bug against
libcurl requesting a GPL-compatible variant, that would be
t; I think the bug should be closed. What do you think?
No, bugs that are tagged "fixed" are excluded from consideration by the
testing scripts; and you should never close an NMU bug unless you're the
maintainer.
The reason phpdoc is not in testing is bug #282274.
--
Steve Langas
sion
> is installed.
> However upon investigating I have the latest mysql-server-4.1 and
> mysql-client-4.1 installed.
Please give the complete error message you received. postfix-tls does
not depend on any mysql packages, so I don't believe that this is a
problem with that packa
cause it was uploaded before the mips porters became aware of this
problem.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
.2, which works for all reverse
> dependencies (dancer-xml, dlisp, dmachinemon, libdshconfig, libupnp).
> Please approve it for sarge.
Re-approved. :)
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
a -4sarge1 to testing-proposed-updates, or else explain why these
changes are warranted during the freeze?
Incidentally, I'm puzzled why quota is calling update-inetd at all from the
postrm, since there's no code in the postinst which adds an inetd entry.
That shouldn't
t Sergio Rua the maintainer?
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Al,
Hmm, unfortunately, my build machine isn't actually beefy enough to build
llvm. :) So this bug will have to wait for someone with more memory than I
have to upload.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
in the 0.4.28-1
package:
Build-Depends-Indep: , autotools-dev, type-handling (>= 0.2.5), debhelper (>=
4.1.0), docbook-xsl, xsltproc, springgraph, ocaml-native-compilers | ocaml,
realpath, fakeroot, python-dev
Any idea what's happening here?
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
gt; that stray patch file lying around in the source tree. Argh!
> I fixed this and am currently uploading -6 which should be okay.
Indeed it is; I've approved it for sarge. Thanks for your work on this.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ou want to upload it, or should I go ahead with an NMU?
I'd like to get this resolved in the next day or two, so that we can send
out the call for serious upgrade testing.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
clone 307473 -1
reassign 307473 mysql-server-4.1
close 307473
reassign -1 mysql-server
thanks
The fixed version of mysql-dfsg-4.1 has reached testing; we're just
waiting for the m68k build of mysql-dfsg to be available before it will be
fixed in 4.0 as well.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postm
t the "variable" font alias in xfonts-base *points* to
helvetica, which is not part of xfonts-base and therefore cannot be relied
on.
The NMU will be uploaded shortly.
-release: please approve wmaker_0.91.0-7.1 for sarge, fixing this RC bug.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern progr
is a missing dependency, and therefore an RC policy violation (and a
violation of the python policy in particular). Please fix this bug.
In the meantime, since bug #307734 has now been open for a week, jabber-irc
will be removed from testing.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
ison so that the absence of $HOME is not
treated as a fatal error while building.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tags 302296 sid
thanks
So far, everyone reporting this bug appears to be running a newer kernel
than the ones shipping with sarge. If it can't be reproduced with a kernel
we ship, it's not RC.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
arious other changes (including UI
changes).
Do you really consider this bug release-critical? Since it seems to only
crash for one person, I'm not sure I agree.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
wrong usage. You want the one that means "this
package permanently replaces files found in the other package", which is the
one that you get without a Conflicts line.
There's no reason to force the removal of the other package here, AFAICT.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
s
> affected by it. There were some similar comments in the ubuntu forums, so the
> number of users affected may be larger.
> But i agree with you, if it's only one user, we may consider this as not
> release-critical.
Ok, I think the correct course of action is to downgrade this
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 02:24:23PM +0400, Alexey Nezhdanov wrote:
> Thursday, 12 May 2005 12:32 Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I was preparing to sponsor your upload of jabber-irc 0.1cvs20050420-1 to
> > fix RC bug #307734, but in the process, lintian spit out this error:
> >
eason this bug shouldn't
> get upgraded to serious.
Yes, leaving junk around in /usr/lib on removal is RC, and AIUI can probably
break the python runtime env in some cases.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
error is reported by dash.
> > > /bin/sh debian/make-skkdic-cdb SKK-JISYO.L \
> > > debian/skkdic-cdb/usr/share/skk/SKK-JISYO.L.cdb
> I just NMU'd to fix this bug, to save this package, which is in woody
> too, for sarge.
Approved.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tags 278495 patch
thanks
Hi folks,
I've prepared an NMU for this bug with the attached patch (should look
familiar), and will be uploading shortly.
-release, please consider doc-base 0.7.18-0.1 for sarge.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
diff -Nru /var/tmp/01YrgvV4q7/doc
textwrap for us to worry about conflicting with
this /usr/bin/dotextwrap binary, this bug is not RC for sarge because
nothing is broken by it in practice. Moving the binary to the -dev package
can be done just as well post-sarge whenever libtextwrap2 appears, using the
same Replaces: libtextwr
had a serious bug in it, and I think it would be great if
> Debian Sarge could get bumped up to 2.2.26 + the above patches before Sarge
> is officially released.
Uh, which of these bugs was supposed to be the "serious" one?
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ny case, unless the maintainers say they think it
makes the package unsuitable for release; and it's not grave since the
workaround is to use /usr/src.)
So, downgrading to important.
If you're using make-kpkg, applying Tzafrir's patch should be a viable
workaround.
Thanks,
--
Steve
d in 2.2.25:
> OpenLDAP 2.2.25 Release
> Removed broken libldap fast synchronous search result processing
> (ITS#3612)
The bug log suggests that this problem is specific to 2.2.24, which we're
not shipping. (We're shipping 2.2.23.)
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
s during
> > doxygen build and missing fonts and related issues that I'm not quite
> > following.
> (CCing the bug and thus the submitter)
Uh, you have to Cc -submitter for that, technically.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
reopen 308534
thanks
> Wordpress developers are not telling anyone what security hole 1.5.1
> fixes. :/
Uh, that doesn't suddenly make this a non-bug...
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 09:41:37AM +0300, Kai Hendry wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 11:27:10PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > Wordpress developers are not telling anyone what security hole 1.5.1
> > > fixes. :/
> > Uh, that doesn't suddenly make this a non-bug
/libnss-ldap.conf (and /etc/libpam-ldap.conf, if you use
libpam-ldap) may also help. Please be sure to remove any passwords from
these files before sending them to the BTS, of course.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
reassign 309026 slapd
thanks
Hi again,
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 10:56:45AM +0200, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> Am Sa den 14. Mai 2005 um 10:07 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> > I'm not sure what you mean by this bug. Are you reporting a bug against the
> > software running on your clien
Jerome,
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 02:33:50AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > severity 84981 grave
> Bug#84981: /var/www/search.php use /etc/udmsearch-php but should use
> mnogosearch-php
> Severity set to `grave'.
Please explain.
--
Steve Langasek
p
tags 306990 patch
thanks
Hi folks,
How does this patch look?
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
diff -u devfsd-1.3.25/debian/changelog devfsd-1.3.25/debian/changelog
--- devfsd-1.3.25/debian/changelog
+++ devfsd-1.3.25/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+devfsd (1.3.25-22.1
to be RC, whether or not this one is; it
seems that this package is rather obsolete and shouldn't be included in a
stable release. Craig, do you agree?
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 02:10:44PM +0200, Arthur Korn wrote:
> Steve Langasek schrieb:
> > How does this patch look?
> Ahrg, I just notice I introduced a similar check (in the
> findfiles function though) in my local version but forgot to
> update the changelog or upload it. Th
, these bugs are all, regrettably,
deferred until the first sarge point release (or later, at the SRM's
discretion).
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
e properly
maintained security-wise; nevertheless, AIUI there is a disappointingly
large number of packages in sarge whose upstreams apply similar policies to
security issues, so I don't know that this particular package should be
treated specially for that reason.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
so prevent it from getting into etch once sarge releases,
please file a serious bug indicating that it's not suitable for a stable
release.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Matthijs,
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 12:44:44PM +0200, Matthijs Mohlmann wrote:
> Attached a patch from cvs which fixes the problem.
What does the second part of this patch have to do with the first?
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern program
ackage which ends up overriding the symlink to
/usr/lib/libldap_r.so.2.0.130 when ldconfig is run.
If I remove that bogus file and reinstall libldap2, I get a sensible-looking
library.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
y it should be -- but the submitter's concern
has not been addressed, so this bug should remain open.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
. It is not an RC bug to *do* this, but it becomes an RC bug
the first time cdbs's behavior changes and debian/rules clean ceases to be
idempotent for your package.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Luk,
You submitted a patch to this bug with the subject "NMU patch ...", but no
NMU has been received in the archive. Are you planning to NMU uw-imap yet
for this bug (and the translation bugs)?
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
package.
Running this on my HT P4 makes my laptop's fan unhappy, but it does not seem
to trigger a crash.
IIRC DoS bugs are normally important anyway (not grave), and this one
seems particularly difficult to exploit, so I'm going to go ahead and
downgrade it.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern
nd of segfaults indicate that listing
pgsql.so before imap.so in php.ini fixes the problem for them, I think this
bug can be downgraded -- the underlying cause has not been addressed, but
people's installs should stop segfaulting, and, well, that's as good as it's
going to get for now
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 07:43:23PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 15-05-2005 16:24, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > You submitted a patch to this bug with the subject "NMU patch ...", but no
> > NMU has been received in the archive. Are you planning to NMU uw-imap yet
calling updmap
> > > 2) updmap could fail gracefully if tetex-bin isn't configured yet.
> > > 3) tipa could depend on tetex-bin
> > I will make tipa depend on tetex-bin. An upload should happen RSN.
> Oh, and please can someone liaise with debian-release@lists.debian.org
> about this!
No need, I've just arked tipa 2:1.2-2 for approval into sarge.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi folks,
It looks like an m68k build of xslideshow 3.1-7 is needed to fix RC bug
#264174 in sarge. Would anyone here care to do the honors?
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 09:16:17AM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 04:12:56AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > Please note that it still won't work at all in Debian if #222307 is not
> > > fixed either, because the current version of mnogosearch-p
as
> > well, since those are also explicitly allowed during the freeze (including
> > being allowed by the NMU policy, Luk).
> Uploaded now. Should I again contackt debian-release or is it enough to
> notify here?
This is enough -- I've approved -11 in.
Thanks,
--
Steve
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 11:07:17AM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote:
> At Sun, 15 May 2005 18:26:54 -0700,
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > It looks like an m68k build of xslideshow 3.1-7 is needed to fix RC bug
> > #264174 in sarge. Would anyone here care to do the honors?
> I just
epared a 2.8.0-1sarge0.1 upload for testing-proposed-updates, using
the same trivial patch as before, and will be uploading shortly.
-release, please approve 2.8.0-1sarge0.1 for sarge when the necessary
binaries are available.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
severity 309252 important
thanks
ifscheme has never been in a stable release, and ifscheme 1.3-3 has been
approved for sarge (and will go in tomorrow), so this is not an RC bug; it
only affects partial upgrades within testing.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
values imposed by Gmail as of May
> 2005 (Closes: #309208)
This upload also silently drops a number of patches that were present in -1.
Please explain why this was done, or revert it if it was a mistake, so this
RC bugfix can get into testing as quickly as possible for sarge.
Thanks,
--
t code, and
either won't run at all or will fail when calling code from this static lib.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ps for the desired setup option.
Furthermore, this package is obviously usable if you're not running a
chrooted smtpd or if not using unix sockets to connect to mysql (because the
server is remote), so the package is not "unusable or mostly so."
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern p
7; fail on i386 when Woody's
> version is used.)
It has previously indicated that the sarge version of aptitude gives
marginally better behavior, on all architectures, than the woody version;
and therefore we had discussed including 'apt-get install aptitude' after
pointing sources.list at sarge as a step for all upgrades.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
10.1-1_i386.deb
> >Please look on the bugs before filling duplicates (and this bug
> >concerned only experimental, it should use the associated tag).
> This bug concerns unstable now.
No, it does not.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 08:07:35PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> tags 139066 moreinfo
> thanks
> In #139066, Steve Langasek makes an interesting suggestion about
> adding /bin/true to /etc/shells
> I consider that interesting, however this file does not belong to
> pass
/xemacs21-nomule | grep NEEDED
I notice that xemacs21-nomule depends on libldap2, and you have version
2.1.30-7 installed. Please send me the output of
$ ls -l /usr/lib/libldap*
as well.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
; (Closes: Bug#309365)
Please do not make sourceful uploads for bugs that are specific to binary
packages on one architecture; this is what binNMUs are for.
I am uploading a binNMU for i386 to testing-proposed-updates, so that this
i386-specific bug can get fixed in sarge without waiting f
he soname of
the library it contains (e.g., libquantlib-0.3.9).
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ibgnutls10).
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
reopen 296077
thanks
Andrew,
Please use the [EMAIL PROTECTED] address to close upgrade reports,
rather than using the 'close' command, so that the submitter gets feedback
about the bug, letting them know why you've closed it.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
gt; lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 2005-05-14 23:06 /usr/lib/libldap_r.so.2 ->
> libldap_r.so.2.0.130
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 221844 2005-05-14 04:54 /usr/lib/libldap_r.so.2.0.130
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 217220 2002-09-30 12:28 /usr/lib/libldap_r.so.2.0.15
Ok, great. What
/
> Where is this symlink supposed to point to ?
With version 2.1.30-7 installed, it should point to libldap_r.so.2.
Guys, I think it's probably a good idea to upload a -8 that runs "rm -f
/usr/lib/libldap.so.2.0.15" in the postinst before running ldconfig... :/
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
bug does not affect comprehension of the sentence or mistranslate
the original, I consider this a minor bug, but it would be nice if the fix
could be included in -14.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
--- xfree86-4.3.0.dfsg.1/debian/po/es.po.orig 2005-05-17 03:06:25.410077665
The worst effect is that there will be a
delay while the package goes through NEW processing, and this is minor
nowadays.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-dev, which may not be
accurate, but doesn't seem to hurt anything and is the least disruptive.
For most libraries, there's usually no need for versioned -dev packages.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
are built.
As such, and seeing there has been no visible activity on this bug since
March, I don't see any reason to treat this bug as a release blocker.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
t too?).
> Steve, Eloy, do we reassign this to one of Debian kernel packages as
> well or just close it?
I've always reassigned such bugs to the kernel.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
his out of testing for the moment.
Jay, taking care to run rm -f /usr/lib/libldap.so.2.0.15 before doing so,
would you mind upgrading to the libldap2 from unstable to see if it fixes
your problem?
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
days. So I definitely need RM's opinion
> on this, before I upload it to unstable (since it will overwrite
> 0.4.2-2).
Please do not upload this. The amd64 sarge port does not use gcc-4.0, and
this would still put unnecessary load on the autobuilders.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmo
y seem work correctly on kdevelop3.
> IMHO these internal command should move /usr/lib/somewhere, but
> it maybe be too late to fix for Sarge.
> I think normal or wishlist is appropriate for this bug.
Agreed that it's not RC; it's a borderline FHS violation to have these in
/usr/bin,
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 03:04:59PM +0200, Dirk Prösdorf wrote:
> On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 02:19:48 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > > But your strace shows that all the time is spent waiting for data from
> > > > the
> > > > server, which sounds like a
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 11:10:26AM -0700, Sebastien Delafond wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 02:57:49AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > Format: 1.7
> > > Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 09:56:22 -0700
> > > Source: python-libgmail
> > > Binary: python-
add anything else. Please see the bug transcript for
> the analysis.
> Thus, please accept gmailfs 0.4 into sarge.
Yes, approved.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
; /usr/lib/i686/mmx/cmov/libGL.so.1
This file does not come from xlibmesa-gl; it comes from either mesag3 or
from libgl1-mesa-glide3. Please indicate the versions of those packages
that you have installed on your system.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
sarge
because the kernels in sarge do not support sync on FAT/VFAT.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
le
without psutils, it just can't handle postscript input files. I believe
this is a perfectly correct use of Recommends: under policy.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 01:25:55PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Steve Langasek [2005-05-18 1:05 -0700]:
> > > apparently the sync option really should *NOT* be used, especially not by
> > > default:
> >
> > > http://readlist.com/lists/vger.kernel.org/linux-ker
usr/share/doc/php4-common/examples
> ln -s php.ini-recommended php.ini
Note that this is fixed in php4 4.3.10-15, which will be shipping with
sarge.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
g?
Does this mean you only upgraded to 2.1.30-6? You need 2.1.30-7 from
unstable to check whether it's the bug we fixed.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
701 - 800 of 10161 matches
Mail list logo
