On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 07:33:45PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> fixed both bugs in -10, uploaded to unstable. It looks like other ruby
> modules may be fail to build as well, the configury of ruby1.8 was
> changed in ruby1.8-1.8.2-4.
Approved for sarge.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
p
eze policy;
+libusb (2:0.1.10a-10) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * No changes. New version needed to be able to upload to
+testing-proposed-updates.
+
+ -- Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 23 May 2005 01:43:16 +0200
Completely unnecessary upload. :/
So now testing doesn't
ing people who aren't installing debian-edu explicitly, so
it doesn't seem to make much difference to their net experience whether
deiban-edu-config is allowed in sarge or not. So unless someone else on the
release team objects, I think I'm going to tag this bug sarge-ignore.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
8-2 is in testing.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
r-base-dev simply specified "awk", which IIRC
is "virtually-essential" by virtue of being a dependency of an essential
package.
In any case, I've tagged this sarge-ignore because being
virtually-essential, mawk is available on all Debian buildds -- accounting
for the lack
verify my success
> but found silly sizes again.
> Restarting samba solved the problem only temporary, after about 10 minutes
> silly sizes again (from MB up to PB). I found nothing related in the logs.
Could you give the exact amounts of free space that are reported? Does this
prob
it may introduce a DoS vector of its own.
> I think the best solution at this point is to build a
> kernel-patch-2.4.27-ia64 (2.4.27-4) that reverts this change and prepare
> a kernel-image along with it, therefore requiring no changes to
> kernel-source-2.4.27. What do you think?
> Release Team: If I get these 2 builds into sid can we move these into
> sarge with the other kernel updates?
Yes.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
; sysklogd
> webmin
Well, this list is overbroad, at least; samba doesn't provide any conffiles.
(samba-common provides /etc/samba/gdbcommands as a conffile, but I doubt
that's the one that's being replaced here.)
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 12:56:22PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 30-05-2005 10:17, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I realize that debian-edu-config is something of a special case, because of
> > its narrow application. I don't think that Debian-Edu should get a free
> >
ug marked 'serious'? I don't see any reference to policy
violation here. There is also no description of the problems that this bug
cause.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
to kernel-source-2.4.27 (2.4.27-10). Version the build-depend to
> match.
> kernel-image-2.4.27-ia64 (2.4.27-10) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
>* Rebuild against kernel-tree-2.4.27-10 and
> kernel-patch-2.4.27-ia64 (2.4.27-4)
Approved.
urgency=medium pushes the limit; I&
.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Ah, hmm. Reading more closely -- ok, the reason for the conffile prompts is
that these files changed location between woody and sarge... I agree, the
sarge package needs to either handle unmodified conffiles, or use ucf.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description
for bdb's performance to be as good as
ldbm's was (which for all I know it could be already) are somewhere between
wishlist and normal; setting to normal for now.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
AIUI, he's saying that a fix he included in the kernel-patch package *was*
merged, and this was the source of the trouble because the source would now
be double-patched :)
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
mber
> to ask the RMs to force -14 into sarge.
As previously noted on IRC, please upload -14 directly as soon as you have
a chance to do so.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
g deal.
> > What other packages does Skolelinux depend on for sarge that are not in
> > Debian?
> ltsp
> j2re1.4
So, precisely one package not in Debian that is actually eligible for
inclusion in Debian. :)
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 03:55:22PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> tags 279489 -fixed
> thanks
>
> On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 12:53:57AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I've prepared a 0-day NMU for this bug, based on Timo's patch. The full
> > diff is at
I've just uploaded an NMU that includes
your patch. The full diff for this NMU is attached.
-release, please approve mdadm 1.9.0-4.1 for sarge (and, when you're
comfortable with it, bump the urgency, since it won't make it in before
Friday otherwise).
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postm
t a conffile should be. (If
you're installing a printer daemon, you almost certainly want to print,
which means customizing the printcap...)
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
mantics on the mount point. What do you all think? Can I do this
without being lynched later, or should I punt this to be fixed as a kernel
security bug post-release?
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/310982
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
hink the release notes should be
a substitute for documentation that explains the Debian packaging system to
users, and too much detail in the release notes just reduces the number of
users who will read it.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 04:46:14AM -
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 04:19:33PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 01.06.2005, 04:46 -0700 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> > The simple answer is "well, don't
> > purge packages without looking at the conffile list!".
> Are you serious? You want the use
e the version of tetex
packages installed, at least.
Supposing for the moment we're out of time before release, which version
would we want to go with -- the 1.9-8 version that assumes .fmt, or the
1.9-9 version that assumes .efmt?
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
long and i can probably get it
> done very late this evening (EDT). is this too late for sarge? if so,
> i'll put the update in for the first sarge update.
I would very much like to see this fixed for sarge, but it seems to now be
quie late in the evening EDT. Is this someth
erride --list $LOGDIR >/dev/null
then
chown -R $SNORTUSER:adm $LOGDIR
chmod u=rwx,g=rxs,o= $LOGDIR
fi
Please send the output of "dpkg-statoverride --list /var/log/snort" on your
system.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
to
not entirely be the case. What version of shellutils do you have on your
system?
It is possible to have a partially-upgraded woody system where 'stat' is not
available; on a fully upgraded sarge system, 'stat' is provided by
coreutils, which is an Essential package.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 02:54:18AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 10:38:30AM +0200, Luc Stepniewski wrote:
> > Package: snort
> > Version: 2.3.2-2
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> > When installing Snort (no
ll OK, or should I make it critical?
At this point, it's fairly likely that security fixes will need to go into
sarge via the security team, regardless of upload urgency.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Based on this, I believe the bug should be downgraded to 'important'; it's
clearly not a security bug, and it's quite a stretch to suggest that this
bug breaks the whole system or renders the package unusable or mostly so.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
an go ahead
with the release. :)
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
severity 271782 important
thanks
It doesn't look like there is an RC issue with udeb sources in sarge any
longer; bug left open for tracking the further question of how to best
handle udeb/source syncing in the future.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Descri
voke-rc.d samba reload
Reloading /etc/samba/smb.conf (smbd only)No process in pidfile
/var/run/samba/smbd.pid' found running; none killed.
.
$
So I really don't think the proposed change is necessary.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 12:05:06PM +0300, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo wrote:
> El Viernes 03 Junio 2005 11:23, Steve Langasek escribió:
> > On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 07:26:28AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > > Quoting Cesar Martinez Izquierdo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
of slapd *also* had corruption issues, and this is the
driving reason for putting slapd 2.2 in sarge.
Which LDAP backend are you using for this directory?
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 01:30:33PM +0900, Christian Balzer wrote:
>
> Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 12:09:19PM +0900, Christian Balzer wrote:
>
> >> Changes are generated by ldifsort.pl/ldifdiff.pl and then applied with
> >> ldapmodify f
real data into slapd to trigger the failure.
Setting LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.21 doesn't prevent the crash, so this doesn't
look like a threading problem with BDB (for once -- thank God).
More info when I have it.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
i Remco,
Package is building here and should be uploaded shortly.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
an unrelated
one, one I believe was fixed in -2.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ears to have stalled, but perhaps reducing the optimisation
> level might help?
Yes, it might help. -O3 is not an optimization level that packages should
be using in general, anyway.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
n either case, we
don't seem to be hitting a ulimit either, since raising the stack ulimit
also has no effect.
I'm going to try to get some glibc eyeballs on this issue; it really doesn't
look like a bug in OpenLDAP to me.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
the problem using a trivial
program that creates a single thread. Perhaps it's only reproducible when
using multiple threads, or when calling other pthreads functions that I
haven't identified yet.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
shoving server stuff into libldap_r; that ought to be fixed, but in the
meantime I'll work up a patch for the immediate problem and possibly throw a
check in debian/rules that will catch mis-linked libraries for us in the
future. Expect a commit soon.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern p
se changes?
I'm not sure how useful it is to set a fixed number of lockers by default,
since the optimal value depends on usage statistics; but bumping from 1000
to 5000 doesn't seem like it can hurt much.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
onsibility of
other package maintainers to not use it for packages uploaded to Debian --
it is not the fault of the cdbs maintainers that you're using an optional
feature of cdbs that violates policy.
Regards,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: opensc
Version: 0.9.4-8
Severity: grave
Hi Eric,
The opensc package has a build-dependency on libsasl-dev, but none of
the resulting binaries have a dependency on libsasl7. Either the
package builds against libsasl-dev but the binary dependency is missing,
or the build dependency should
Package: xfmail
Version: 1.5.5-2
Severity: grave
Hi Florian,
The xfmail package has a build-dependency on libsasl-dev, but none of
the resulting binaries have a dependency on libsasl7. Either the
package builds against libsasl-dev but the binary dependency is missing,
or the build dependency sho
as a conflict in gnupg2?
It could be listed as a conflict, but this package doesn't exist in the
Debian archive (and AFAIK it never did), so this is not a serious bug.
The pinentry errors are also unrelated to gnupg2, according to the log you
cited; you seem to have a number of non-Debian pa
s bug could be
reassigned to smbldap-tools or closed. (It would no longer be RC at least,
since the smbldap-tools package doesn't depend on ldap-utils currently
either.)
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
Index: debian/control
==
e
> /usr/include/xfs/xfs_fs.h:394: error: field `__user' has incomplete type
> /usr/include/xfs/xfs_fs.h:394: error: parse error before '*' token
> make[2]: *** [dm_handle.lo] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [default] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/dmapi-2.
s, and lost the SCREEN_FONT
setting).
Result: accented characters on the console were displayed poorly.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tarting OpenLDAP: slapd slurpd.
> dpkg-reconfiger slapd does not ask that question again which means that
> I'm now effectively with a broken slapd package.
echo slapd slapd/dump_database_destdir /var/backups/slapd-VERSION |
debconf-set-selections
I agree that this should be
ze
to in order to get it booting?
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ase team note: this package is being removed from testing due to RC bug
#212307.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 08:51:48AM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 06:16:34PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 10:28:06PM +, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > > It seems the default value for slapd/dump_database_destdir is set
&g
of ldd. So there is
no missing dependency.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
etter if fix_ldif knew about schemas and could therefore know
which entries to automatically change; but even without that, we could
safely edit the LDIF for this when it's a known attrib like uidNumber or
gidNumber, couldn't we?
and
I don't know what it is.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 11:49:04AM +0200, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 06:28:01PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 03:09:53AM +0200, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > > Debian-installer-version: 2005/04/17 rc3 netboot
with a particular other plugin. This may not be a bug in
xmms-arts at all; it could also be a crossfade bug. Severity downgraded.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ist, and what are its
contents?
Severity downgraded, because the above is a deliberate safety check in the
code to prevent destroying backups on error.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Sam,
Both libtext-wikiformat-perl and rtfm are being removed from testing because
of this bug. The rtfm package should make its way back in automatically
once this RC bug is fixed.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi tora,
Both avalon-excalibur and jmeter are being removed from testing because of
this bug. The jmeter package should make it back into testing by itself
once this bug is resolved.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ters to be in your usernames anyway.
Even with this change, though, the regexp doesn't seem to work so well with
actual multibyte UTF8 chars in the string being compared.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tax 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27:
mailPreferenceOption
uidNumber
gidNumber
shadowLastChange
shadowMin
shadowMax
shadowWarning
shadowInactive
shadowExpire
shadowFlag
ipServicePort
ipServiceProtocol
ipProtocolNumber
oncRpcNumber
There are of course plenty of other schemas that will use this common
syntax; it's used by both krb5-kdc and samba schemas that I have on hand.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ncy, is a good reason not to
change the build-dep at this time.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
rivers to be loaded on some
systems before trying to bring up RAID -- as discussed on IRC, on a sarge
system, /proc should be mounted well before this point). But, your proposed
fix was one I had evaluated, and I consistently get the above error when
trying to run mdadm -A -s --auto on a system that has udev loaded. Any
ideas?
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
27;ll get this over to the security team asap; in the meantime, the patch is
here for people who can't wait for the official builds.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 09:48:53AM +0200, Rasmus Bøg Hansen wrote:
> Andrew Bartlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
And now... the patch. :)
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 10:33:44PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> And valgrind reveals all in the end. Attached is a patch which fixes up a
> rounding error in the use of malloc_array(); this is probably a bit wa
you using smbmount or smbclient?
The smbmount command is from the smbfs package.
Were you using smbmount 3.0.11 with kernel 2.6.11 as well, or did you have a
different kernel installed when you had this working?
What was the command line you used when mounting the share?
--
Steve Langasek
p
f you find bugs (this one or others) in nagios.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
reassign 305467 smbfs
thanks
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 08:04:42PM +0930, Arthur Marsh wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> >Hi Arthur,
> >On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 03:13:08PM +0930, Arthur Marsh wrote:
> >>Accented characters on Win98SE filenames translate into 2 characters
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 03:16:39PM +0400, Al Nikolov wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 April 2005 14:07, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > FYI, the netsaint-plugins package is only available from non-us.debian.org,
> > which is quite moribund and will be discontinued with the release of sarge.
&g
n a future-proofed manner. The following command
gives the policy-recommended package name for any library:
$ objdump -p /tmp/silc/usr/lib/libsilc-1.0.so.2 \
| sed -n -e's/^[[:space:]]*SONAME[[:space:]]*//p' \
| sed -e's/\([0-9]\)\.so\./\1-/; s/\.so\.//'
libsilc-1.0-2
$
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
l for a particular upstream. It can of
course make its way back into testing once this bug is resolved; since arla
seems to include send-pr under the name arla-send-pr specifically to avoid
conflicts, I think it's best if the info doc filename be changed to match.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
ents to grep!!!
Yeesh, why would anyone want to use grep for this anyway? -fsigned-char is
a *no-op* on the other architectures; lose the stupid shell tricks, people.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
g pointer to incomplete type
make[1]: *** [rbgdk-pixbuf-format.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory /home/vorlon/ruby-gnome2-0.11.0/gdkpixbuf'
-
SUCCEEDED: NONE
FAILED: gdkpixbuf
-
Done.
make: *** [build-gdkpixbuf-stamp] Error 1
So, hopefully this is fixed in 0.12.0-2?
for the copies of this package present in
the Debian archive proper. This seems to be an amd64-specific problem with
lsb-release.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
inuing."; \
> exit 1; \
> fi; \
> done
Hah, whoops, obvious thinko; need to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH here. Will be
fixed in svn shortly.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
If I understand the bug description correctly, this bug does not appear to
exist in the current code because move_old_database_away is not reading from
a pipe. Should probably be closed?
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
reassign 282775 libsasl2-dev
thanks
This is actually a bug in libsasl2-dev, whose static lib (/libtool file)
appears to have an undeclared dependency on libdb4.2.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: slapd
Version: 2.2.23-3
Severity: minor
Testing with an LDIF that I knew would require the use of fix_ldif, I
got the following curious error:
Backing up /etc/ldap/slapd.conf in /var/backups/slapd-2.1.30-3... done.
Updating config access directives... done.
Moving old database dire
Package: slapd
Version: 2.2.23-4
Severity: important
Upgrading from woody to sid fails on one installation on an attribute
having the following syntax:
telephonenumber:: IC0g
I have no idea what it means, but 2.0.23 happily accepts it as input and
happily generates it as output, so it would be
FWIW, "IC0g" appears to code for the string " - ": a strange phone number to
be sure, but I don't see anything in the RFCs that would make this an
invalid telephoneNumber value.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-4 Build-Depends on libsasl2-dev | libsasl-dev. What am I
missing here?
Reverse build-deps were checked before removing cyrus-sasl from testing,
fwiw.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
library package truly is something that we should be trying to remove,
then such an RC bug is almost certainly grounds for removing the affected
package from testing (and if not, that's what t-p-u is for).
Jeroen, feel free to remove linc from unstable; the reverse-dependencies
would then h
, "%s/f2c_rc.b_XX", tmpdir);
sprintf(blkdfname, "%s/f2c_blkd_XX", tmpdir);
sprintf(p1_file, "%s/f2c_p1f_XX", tmpdir);
sprintf(p1_bakfile, "%s/f2c_p1fb_XX", tmpdir);
sprintf(sortfname, "%s/f2c_sort_XX
tags 305971 patch
thanks
Oh what the heck, here's a patch.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 01:58:37PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 10:50:15AM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > Package: f2c
> > V
ating filenames on the Unix side as if they were UTF8
encoded. Are you using UTF8 for non-ASCII filenames on your system? If
not, try setting 'unix charset = iso8859-1' (or whatever's appropriate) in
your smb.conf and see if these errors go away.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
> dh_link -a
> dh_dhelp
> make: dh_dhelp: Command not found
> make: *** [binary-arch] Error 127
> The newer version in 'unstable' does not have this problem.
The newer version of this non-free package is held out of testing by missing
m68k and s390. Anyone care to
Package: mesa
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
mesa is now failing to build on all architectures except for i386, alpha
and amd64. E.g.:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=mesa&ver=6.2.1-3&arch=powerpc&stamp=728761&file=log&as=raw
This looks like an error where the package is trying to b
y this bug can be tagged 'patch' now, and you can have
your pick of them. :)
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
diff -ur freetype-2.1.7.orig/src/bdf/bdflib.c freetype-2.1.7/src/bdf/bdflib.c
--- freetype-2.1.7.orig/src/bdf/bdflib.c2003-10-15 15:20:56.0
-070
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 12:39:35PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 09:42:12PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > The newer version of this non-free package is held out of testing by missing
> > m68k and s390. Anyone care to build & upload?
> Bu
e an upload that fixes this bug? Are you in need of a sponsor to
upload for you?
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
one this bug off as a removal
request against the ftp.debian.org pseudopackage. (Not reassigning -- we
don't want libgnutls10 to sneak back into testing.)
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-21
Severity: minor
Tags: l10n
Hi folks,
Thanks for the English fixes included in the -21 upload, they're most
appreciated.
Unfortunately, at least one new error was added to the postinst in this
upload:
If other services has begun to fail mysteriously after t
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 10:25:56AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > This looks like a pretty serious regression in the latest security NMU of
> > f2c. The code now reads:
> > char *c_functions = "c_functions";
> > char *coutput
ces2 doesn't use libtheora directly. This is
a bug in libshout3-dev, which is the package pulling in the theora
dependency.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
x27; to `kodos'.
Eh, this bug was caused by an incompatible change in python-qt3. The new
version of python-qt3 can't be allowed into testing until this bug is
resolved.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 01:13:14AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 24-04-2005 23:33, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > merge 306160 306161
> > reassign 306160 libshout3-dev
> > thanks
> > On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 06:06:22PM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
> >>
601 - 700 of 10161 matches
Mail list logo
