Hello,
> 276006bogus error message when $TEXINPUTS contains nonexistent
> directory
> --
> -abs=`cd "$dir" && pwd` && TEXINPUTS=$TEXINPUTS$path_sep$abs
> +abs=`cd "$dir" 2>/dev/null && pwd` &&
> TEXIN
25>
I added an example to this bug.
Actually, I think that Gnome should phase out glib-gettext and use
GNU gettext instead. I filed this suggestion as
<http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343885>
Have a nice day,
Stepan Kasal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
Hello,
> Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'm still wondering whether we should just simply revert both patches,
I have talked with Ralf by phone, and I agree with him that backing
out my cleanup (plus later fixes to it) and replacing it by a couple
of straightforward fixes for
uestion: should we make the commitment that
AC_INIT leaves the parameters untached or not?
(I don't know the answer.)
Have a nice day,
Stepan Kasal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 08:19:14AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> I guess you could instead also m4_define TEST_INIT, so that it will not
> take part in the requirement-diversion game. That should preserve the
> order as well.
no, this won't work; AC_REQUIRE has to be called inside an AC
Hello,
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 07:26:41PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > +# ... We should not override ac_cv_exeext if it was
> > > +# cached, so that the user can short-circuit this test for compilers
> > > +# unknown to Autoconf.
... but it would be better if this override were done by ass
Hello,
patch forgotten, sorry. Attached to this mail.
Stepan
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 02:06:53PM +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 07:26:41PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > > +# ... We should not override ac_cv_exeext if it was
> >
Hi Norbert,
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 07:20:18PM +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Don, 16 Mär 2006, Karl Berry wrote:
> > Yes, @ifset/@ifclear (among other things) are impossible to reliably
> > parse in TeX :(. Especially nested.
>
> And why did it work with the old version?
by shere luck, pr
x27;
again for each language.
I prepared the following patch. (Be sure to update your CVS checkout
before applying it.)
Have a nice fortnight,
Stepan
2006-04-01 Stepan Kasal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* lib/autoconf/c.m4 (AC_PROG_CC, AC_PROG_CXX, AC_PROG_OBJC): Call
_A
9 matches
Mail list logo
