Package: kdelibs5-data
Version: 4:4.6.3-2
Severity: normal
Hi,
When upgrading:
Preparing to replace kdelibs5-data 4:4.4.5-5 (using
.../kdelibs5-data_4:4.6.3-2_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement kdelibs5-data ...
dpkg: error processing
Package: blt-dev
Version: 2.4z-6
Severity: serious
Package does not install:
Preparing to replace blt-dev 2.4z-5 (using .../blt-dev_2.4z-6_amd64.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement blt-dev ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/blt-dev_2.4z-6_amd64.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite '/u
Package: gdmap
Version: 0.8.1-3
Severity: minor
Hi,
gdmap is currently in Section: graphics. It is not a graphics program,
but an administration program, hence it probably should be in Section:
admin.
Sami
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT p
Package: system-config-printer
Version: 1.4.1-3
Severity: minor
Judging from the description of the package, it should be in Section:
admin, not Section: python; it has nothing at all to do with Python
programming. In fact I'd also question what useful purpose the
description mentioning that the p
Package: python-mpltoolkits.basemap
Version: 1.0.3+dfsg-2
Severity: normal
Importing mpl_toolkits.basemap causes a warning to be emitted:
$ python
Python 2.7.5+ (default, Aug 4 2013, 10:07:17)
[GCC 4.8.1] on linux2
Type "help", "copyr
Package: e2fsprogs
Version: 1.42.1-1
Severity: normal
When investigating why e2resizing a 100G filesystem to 75G takes
several hours of *CPU* time on a Core i7 computer (in the "Scanning
inode table" phase -- you might get a bug report about that later if
turning optimizations on doesn't help very
tags 661071 patch
thanks
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 01:48:54AM +0200, Sami Liedes wrote:
>
> 20 dpkg-source: info: building e2fsprogs in e2fsprogs_1.42.1-1.dsc
> 21 debian/rules build
> 22 /bin/sh: 1: Syntax error: B
Package: linux-tools-3.2
Version: 3.2.1-2
Severity: normal
Hi!
perf report does not show source code lines (annotation) for some
binaries with separate debug information if those build-id's have been
cached in perf's build-id cache. This is true for at least those
packages whose debug symbols are
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 09:57:14PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> I've already checked in a change to do this. See commit f921eda1.
I guess this bug can be marked fixed in 1.42.1-2?
Sami
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: e2fsprogs
Version: 1.42.1-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Shrinking a filesystem is currently very CPU intensive. On a 100G ext4
filesystem filled to 50% full by making copies of /usr/share/doc to
$MNTPOINT/doc{1,2,3,...}, running resize2fs on a fairly slow (~5400
rpm) disk and a fast Core
Package: obnam
Version: 0.24.1-1
Severity: normal
[This may actually be a data loss bug, consider grave severity]
I tested obnam by backing up a few subdirectories of my home
directory. I interrupted the backup a few times with ctrl-C; don't
know if that's required for this bug to happen.
My ~/.
Package: systemtap-server
Version: 1.6-1
Severity: normal
stap-server start, as documented in the stap-server(8), does not seem
to work at all.
First, the -u option fails due to missing runuser (which comes in
coreutils, but not in Debian's coreutils for some reason):
---
Package: libreoffice-voikko
Version: 3.2-2
Severity: minor
It seems that the debian/rules tries to handle
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=noopt, but that no longer seems to work for some
reason -- the source is built with -O2 and no -g:
$ debuild -e
I too am seeing this crash under KDE. It's something PulseAudio
related. The crash happens in libasound.
I compiled alsa-utils and libasound with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="noopt
nostrip" to get some useful backtraces.
First, when run under valgrind (valgrind --log-file=valgrind.log
alsamixer), alsamixer
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: USB stick, made with cat debian-wheezy-DI-a1-amd64-netinst.iso
>/dev/sdd
Image version: debian-wheezy-DI-a1-amd64-netinst.iso, sha1sum
c292dba20ef374231c47ac396b5f486d8e1eb35e
Date:
Machine: HP Pavilion dv6-
Package: insserv
Version: 1.14.0-3
Severity: minor
Hi,
I cringe every time insserv gives a report such as this:
insserv: warning: current stop runlevel(s) (0 6) of script `alsa-utils'
overwrites defaults (0 1 6).
-
Package: clang
Version: 3.1-5
Severity: normal
I assume clang++ tries to support the --std=gnu+11 option. Compiling a
hello world program with it fails:
$ cat test.cpp
#include
int main() {
std::cout << "Hello, world!" << std::end
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 01:15:14PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> "debtags update" uses apt to retrieve updated tags and since apt in your
> configuration has problem with Cache-Limit (see apt.conf man page)
> debtags has the same problem too.
> Thanks.
Well, I'd imagine it could give
found 654198 0.29-1
thanks
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 03:32:46PM +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> close 654198 0.26-1
> thanks
>
> the corruption when obnam is terminated with control-c should be fixed
> as of version 0.26-1, but I forgot to include the bug in the changelog.
Reopening per IRC discuss
Oh yes, there's one more thing I found slightly confusing during the
(expert) installation.
After I have set some partitions to be used as physical volumes for
encryption in the "Partition disks" screen, I select "Configure
encrypted volumes". In the resulting screen, there is a choice to
encrypt
Package: audacity
Version: 2.0.0-1
Severity: normal
While trying to build a debuggable package with
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="noopt nostrip",
I ran into this.
Even with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=noopt, most of the modules in the project
are built with -O2, while some are correctly built with -O0 (as the
las
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 03:29:03AM +0300, Sami Liedes wrote:
> Package: audacity
> Version: 2.0.0-1
> Severity: normal
>
> While trying to build a debuggable package with
>
> DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="noopt nostrip",
>
> I ran into this.
>
> Even with DEB_
Package: debian-goodies
Version: 0.60
Severity: normal
Hi,
When fetching a nonexisting package, debget silently fails:
$ debget nonexistent-package
$
There is code in /usr/b
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.8
Severity: wishlist
[#657699 is a special case of this]
Hi,
It would be useful to have a check for .pc (pkg-config) files
introducing flags they probably should not, like Cflags -O2, -g or
-DNDEBUG.
I went through all the .pc files in the current sid amd64 archive
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 05:01:32PM +0300, Sami Liedes wrote:
> I went through all the .pc files in the current sid amd64 archive.
> Here are some examples I consider suspicious:
Ok, I've tried very hard to attach a small tarball containing all the
.pc files, as extracting them otherwi
Source: gmime
Version: 2.6.22-2
Severity: serious
With package 'ripmime' installed:
$ apt-get source gmime-bin
$ cd gmime-2.6.22/tests/
$ mkdir attachments
$ cd attachments
$ cat ../message-partial.* ../*.eml |ripmime -i -
$ ls -l *.jpg
Package: texlive-fonts-extra-doc
Version: 2016.20160512-1
Severity: serious
When upgrading texlive-fonts-extra-doc:
Preparing to unpack .../texlive-fonts-extra-doc_2016.20160512-1_all.deb ...
Unpacking texlive-fonts-extra-doc (2016.2016
Package: proofgeneral
Version: 4.3~pre131011-0.1
Severity: normal
When upgrading proofgeneral, I get this message:
Preparing to unpack .../proofgeneral_4.3~pre131011-0.1_all.deb ...
ERROR: proofgeneral is broken - called emacs-package-r
Package: openssl-blacklist
Version: 0.5-3
Severity: normal
openssl-vulnkey fails when applied to a file which is not x509, req or
rsa. This breaks doing something like "openssl vulnkey *" in a keys
directory, because it stops processing once it fails.
-
Package: libwine
Version: 1.6.2-20
Severity: normal
Trying to upgrade libwine results in an error:
Preparing to unpack .../wine32_1.6.2-21_i386.deb ...
Unpacking wine32:i386 (1.6.2-21) over (1.6.2-20) ...
Preparing to unpack .../wine_1.
Package: lib32z1-dev
Version: 1:1.2.8.dfsg-2+b1
Severity: important
lib32z1-dev fails to include zconf.h, which results in compiling
(AFAICT) any zlib-using program to fail:
$ cat zlib-32.c
#include
$ gcc -m32 -c zlib-32.c
In file in
Package: libprocps3-dev
Version: 2:3.3.9-9
Severity: normal
Hi,
libprocps3-dev cannot currently be installed for multiple
architectures, causing inconvenience if one wishes to compile procps
code for both 32-bit and 64-bit:
$ sudo apt-
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 04:38:03PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 11:57:30PM +0300, Sami Liedes wrote:
>
> > lib32z1-dev fails to include zconf.h, which results in compiling
> > (AFAICT) any zlib-using program to fail:
>
> This header file is in
Package: gnome-tweak-tool
Version: 3.14.2-1
Severity: normal
Starting gnome-tweak-tool from command line gives this error message:
$ gnome-tweak-tool
WARNING : Shell not installed or running
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/u
linux_audit.c tries to handle the case where the kernel
has been compiled without AUDIT support, but fails miserably.
Author: Sami Liedes
---
--- sudo-1.8.11p1.orig/plugins/sudoers/linux_audit.c
+++ sudo-1.8.11p1/plugins/sudoers/linux_audit.c
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ linux_audit_open(void)
au_fd
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 04:13:16PM +0300, Sami Liedes wrote:
> --- sudo-1.8.11p1.orig/plugins/sudoers/linux_audit.c
> +++ sudo-1.8.11p1/plugins/sudoers/linux_audit.c
> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ linux_audit_open(void)
> au_fd = audit_open();
> if (au_fd == -1) {
> /* K
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 12:14:29PM +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> > Isn't it bad to output something the user doesn't understand even if
> > they didn't use -v?
>
> I disagree with users not understanding that, or that being a big
> problem. The first message, "There are 0 new [-1]
Package: ghc-mod
Version: 5.2.1.1-1
Severity: normal
When upgrading ghc-mod, I get this message (which does not prevent
installation):
Preparing to unpack .../ghc-mod_5.2.1.1-1_amd64.deb ...
ERROR: ghc-mod is broken - called emacs-packa
Package: borgbackup
Version: 1.0.11-3
Severity: normal
Merely starting borg after upgrading to python3.5 3.5.4-3 fails:
$ borg
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/borg", line 11, in
load_entry_point('borgbackup==1.0
Package: gdb
Version: 7.12-6
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
Reverse debugging is currently broken with sid's combination of libc
and GDB on x86_64. The problem is that support for some instructions
is missing; one of these is vorpd, used at least in libc's memset():
=
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 08:59:34PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Can you please provide a clear, from first steps description of what's
> > needed and why?
>
> again, here is the example which you removed:
>
[...]
>^
> compilation terminated.
>
> The example fails because the
a39564c] committing changes in /etc after apt run
Author: Sami Liedes
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
$ sudo apt autoremove
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
libast
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 07:24:05AM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> Well, you asked aptitude to upgrade that package, but its dpkg
> database entry appears to be corrupted in a bad way. There's no way for
> aptitude to find out which package broke (short of something horrible
> and error-prone, l
Package: randim
Version: 5.0-1
Severity: important
randim does not start:
$ randim
Welcome to the random transformation image generator.
This is version 5.0.
X Error of failed request: BadColor (invalid Colormap parameter)
Major op
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.91d
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I fought with initramfs-tools for some time because I had not noticed
the warning in the man page that script names must match
[a-zA-Z0-9_]+. (I admit I don't read entire man pages when I just need
to quickly check how to do something
Package: gnat-4.3-doc
Version: 20080127-1
Severity: normal
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/gnat-4.3-doc_4.3-20080127-1_all.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/share/doc-base/gnat', which is also in package
gnat-4.
Package: gnupg
Version: 1.4.6-2
Severity: normal
Hi,
When I do gpg --passphrase foobar file.txt, I get a passphrase entry
window (from pinentry-qt I think).
Doing gpg --no-use-agent --passphrase foobar file.txt works as
expected.
Sami
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 08:36:43PM +0200, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 01:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> > When I do gpg --passphrase foobar file.txt, I get a passphrase entry
> > window (from pinentry-qt I think).
> >
> > Doing gpg --no-use-agent --passphrase foobar file.txt works as
Package: openssh-server
Version: 1:4.3p2-10
Severity: normal
Hi,
I started to get mysterious messages in my auth.log like this:
May 5 08:52:09 lh sshd[27269]: error: Failed to allocate internet-domain X11
display socket.
and decided to investigate why it fails. The debug output of sshd is
a
Package: melting
Version: 4.2g-1
Severity: minor
There is a typo in the package description: "easely". Should be
"easily".
Sami
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.20.4-gr
Package: apt
Version: 0.7.11
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I was trying to think about ways to manage the package chaos
(apt-cache stats shows about 3 packages) from the perspective of a
normal user, who would be totally overwhelmed by this number. Tasks is
one way to attack this, but I don't think
Package: kdebase-runtime-dbg
Version: 4:4.0.0-3
Severity: normal
Preparing to replace kdebase-runtime-dbg 4:4.0.0-3 (using
.../kdebase-runtime-dbg_4%3a4.0.1-1_amd64.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement kdebase-runtime-dbg ...
dpkg: error proc
Package: etckeeper
Version: 0.1
Severity: important
Hi,
I just installed etckeeper. The installation seems to have gone
smoothly:
Selecting previously deselected package etckeeper.
Unpacking etckeeper (from .../archives/etckeeper_0.1_a
Package: apt-cacher-ng
Version: 0.1-1
Severity: minor
There is a typo in the package description, "ressources"; should be
resources.
Sami
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64
Hi,
I believe all these 4 bugs (#449425, #449360, #449187, #449106) are
the same, judging by all of them breaking in pkgRecords::Lookup().
Do you need help debugging this? This is 98% reproducible for me after
doing an upgrade where any packages were actually upgraded. See
#449187 for a valgrind
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 07:26:42AM -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> I don't know for sure that they're the same. Breaking in ::Lookup()
> just means it got an invalid iterator. I've found a possible bug that
> could (perhaps) explain your crash and the crashes that happen on update
> or after an
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.4.6.1-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
Currently, the package `gnokii' in unstable is in a broken state such
that I can neither upgrade or remove it. Because of this single not
very central package aptitude refuses to upgrade 500 MB worth of other
packages (I haven't been able
package gnokii
severity 431706 critical
thanks
Hi,
gnokii in its current state can (possibly due to a limitation in
apt/aptitude) block all other packages in the system from upgrading.
See #435403. Hence I guess "makes unrelated software on the system (or
the whole system) break". Downgrade if I'
Package: bittornado
Version: 0.3.18-7
Severity: normal
Hi,
I ran the command
bttrack.bittornado --dfile dfile --port 8889 --allowed_dir allowed/
and everything works fine, except I get a lot of errors in bttrack's
output. Output like this is repeated a few times (edited out some data
since I
Package: python-coverage
Version: 2.80-1
Severity: normal
If the profiled python script uses any .py files under
/usr/lib/python$VER/, the command "python-coverage -a" tries to write
in that directory (and if run as root, probably would succeed):
--
Package: python-coverage
Version: 2.80-1
Severity: serious
It appears python-coverage should depend on python-pkg-resources:
$ python-coverage
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/python-coverage", line 5, in
from pk
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 09:31:07AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> On 22-Aug-2008, Sami Liedes wrote:
> > If the profiled python script uses any .py files under
> > /usr/lib/python$VER/, the command "python-coverage -a" tries to write
> > in that directory (and if run
Package: kiki-tho-nano-bot
Version: 1.0.2+dfsg1-1
Severity: minor
"Kiki the nano bot is a 3D puzzle game, a mixture of Sokoban and
Kula-World. Your task is to help Kiki, a small robot living in the
nano world, repeair its Maker."
The word is repair, not repeair.
Sami
-- Syst
package ca-certificates
found 509419 20080809
thanks
I have also got with ca-certificates 20080809 (the current in testing
and sid, I believe) several warnings lately from Konqueror for
different sites about unknown CA, with the CA being Verisign.
Sami
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi
Package: screen
Version: 4.0.3-11
Severity: normal
Hi,
I still sometimes get the error "WriteMessage: Bad file descriptor"
when running screen -r with 4.0.3-11. This is obviously related to
#477739, however the conditions seem somewhat different so I decided
to open a different bug.
Contrary to
Package: mozilla-firefox-adblock
Version: 0.5.2.039-4
Severity: normal
Output from dpkg:
Setting up mozilla-firefox-adblock (0.5.2.039-4) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/mozilla-firefox-adblock.postinst: line 8:
update-mozilla-firefox-chrome: c
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 01:40:24PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> With respect to that change, I wonder whether the speedup is from
> changing += to push_back, or from changing += to copy() (perhaps
> checking for the null terminator is expensive?). In the latter case,
> how does string.append p
Package: koules
Version: 1.4-11.2
Severity: normal
When I start koules, it crashes almost instantly:
$ koules
The game
K O U L E S
For
Package: libdrm2
Version: 2.4.9-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
I saw this sometimes on KDE 3, now it happens many times a day on KDE
4 from unstable, so I spent some time figuring out what actually
happens (backtrace attached). I think I've also seen it both on an
Intel graphics card and a Radeon (with t
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 02:38:10PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 03:59 +0300, Sami Liedes wrote:
> > I saw this sometimes on KDE 3, now it happens many times a day on KDE
> > 4 from unstable, so I spent some time figuring out what actually
> > happens (b
Package: openoffice.org-common
Version: 1:3.0.1-9
Severity: serious
Something, presumably in openoffice.org or in pre/postinstall,
modifies the file
/usr/lib/openoffice/basis3.0/share/config/javasettingsunopkginstall.xml
. Sorry, I don't know what modifies it and when, but I can deduce that
it's
Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Version: 2:2.6.3-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
X crashes when exiting KDE 4.2.2 from unstable running under kdm.
After some trickery I managed to catch a backtrace.
Architecture is amd64. I'm actually not 100% certain this is an X bug;
under a different kernel setup (t
Package: libsndfile1
Version: 1.0.20-1
Severity: normal
Tags: security
Hi,
I have discovered six different SIGFPE crashes with crafted input
files in libsndfile. Triggering input files are attached.
The crashes are:
1) in htk.c:198 (htk_read_header), divisor sample_period can be 0.
2) in alaw.
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 05:53:03PM +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Sami Liedes wrote:
>
> > I have discovered six different SIGFPE crashes with crafted input
> > files in libsndfile. Triggering input files are attached.
>
> Seems the debian bug tracker filtered them o
Package: pnopaste
Version: 1.2-2
Severity: normal
Hi,
The package description for pnopaste is as follows:
Nopaste software written in Perl
Perl Nopaste is a Nopaste software written in Perl and with MySQL as
backend. It includes featu
Package: mimedecode
Version: 1.9-4
Severity: normal
Tags: security
Hi,
I don't know if this has a security impact, but I guess it could since
emails are come by their very nature from the network.
mimedecode segfaults on invalid input:
---
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 03:20:44PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> Sami Liedes wrote:
>
> > Package: emacs-goodies-el
> > Version: 30.0-1
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The quack package for scheme programming is enabled by default
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 02:04:16PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 23:05 +0200, Fabian Köster wrote:
> >
> > I have a similar problem using Ubuntu Jaunty with the radeon-driver.
> >
> > See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/348332
>
> Backtraces aren't usef
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:00:19PM +0300, Sami Liedes wrote:
> When using UXA, changing vts causes an assertion failure in X server
> ("../../src/i830_batchbuffer.h:78: intel_batch_emit_dword: Assertion
> `pI830->batch_ptr != ((void *)0)' failed.").
Both of these issue
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.4.11.11-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
Aptitude does not seem to honor DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nostrip when
building the package; the installed binary is stripped regardless.
This makes debugging in some scenarious a bit more difficult.
Supporting DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS is recommended
Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Version: 2:2.7.1-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
This is something I've seen only for a few days, so I assume it's
caused by a recent update in unstable xorg (I also recently updated
kernel 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30, but I'm quite sure X ran fine for several
days after that).
Whe
Package: debtags
Version: 1.7.9+b1
Severity: normal
Hi,
I noticed that the cronjob running `debtags update' had failed with a
segmentation fault. This can be reproduced by running it from the
command line:
# /usr/bin/debtags update
Seg
Package: emacs-goodies-el
Version: 30.0-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
The quack package for scheme programming is enabled by default even in
the non-aggressive state. It however is quite a bit different from
emacs' default scheme mode. Hence the package probably should only be
enabled in aggressive mode
Package: dovecot
Version: 1:1.0.0-1+b1
Severity: normal
Hi,
The command
/usr/sbin/dovecot --exec-mail imap
crashes immediately without any explanation if the config file setting
`protocols' doesn't include imap. A debug run:
$ gdb
Hi,
What about this bug with last comment in 1997, still valid and should
be fixed?
Sami
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
Have you still encountered this old bug?
Sami
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
Is this old bug report still valid / important?
Sami
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
Is this old bug still relevant?
Sami
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Maybe this old bug report can be closed?
Sami
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Maybe this old bug can be closed?
Sami
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Any information on whether there has been any progress on this bug or
if it's fixed or irrelevant nowadays?
Sami
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
I think this can be closed?
Sami
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Works for me.
Sami
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
This >7 year old bug requests for recompilation of the package.
Perhaps it has already been recompiled since?
Sami
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
Perhaps this old bug can be closed?
Sami
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
package gconf
found 210911 1.0.9-7.2
thanks
Hi,
How about fixing this trivial bug in the next release?
Sami
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
Anything new about this bug?
I think I could help with this, either the reverse engineering or
reimplementation effort, if that's needed. I don't have very much
experience with RPC though.
Sami
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: pdftk
Version: 1.40-2
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Hi,
I don't know whose bug this is, pdftk's (by possibly setting wrong
classpath? I don't know) or gcj's or what, but anyway, for me pdftk
doesn't build:
-
Package: pdftk
Version: 1.40-2
Severity: normal
Hi,
In the form available at [1] (which is a form for reporting some taxes
to the Finnish tax authority), the command
pdftk 9a2006.pdf generate_fdf output 9a2006.fdf
generates fdf where the field names are garbled into 16-bit characters
that loo
Hi,
When I build snort on my sid amd64 box, the .so files get built as 64
bit as they should. So this is probably something debian buildd
specific.
Sami
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
101 - 200 of 327 matches
Mail list logo
