Thanks Paul!
I've had too much piled on to be able to test this before now, but
finding time for a new upload with this as a confirmed fix should
be much easier.
I'll get some new packages tested shortly,
cheers,
Ron
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 10:08:52PM +0800, Paul wrote:
> I can
and preferred behaviour
that we should not mess with lightly (and hence there is no bug
here at all) -- but I'll take arguments as to why this variable
is special and should be taken from the environment by default.
Along with a list of what others should receive similar red-carpet
treatment i
Package: dh-make
Version: 0.40
Severity: normal
Hi,
I see that /usr/share/debhelper/dh_make/debiank/rules
still uses a kdist_config target. make-kpkg appears
to call kdist_configure (now), so this boilerplate
should probably be updated.
cheers,
Ron
-- System Information:
Debian Release
being a bit more logical
rather than through the addition of extra overrides.
Or is there something else altogether that we should
replace all these duplicated tests with?
cheers,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks, will look at adding something like it to the next upload.
cheers,
Ron
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 10:58:11PM -0700, Richard Esplin wrote:
> Package: wx2.6-examples
> Version: 2.6.1.2
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
>
> Running examples/wxPython/demo.py fails because
Package: baobab
Version: 1.3.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
Please rebuild this package with pango 1.8.2 from unstable
(or arrange to have pango 1.10.0 made available there too)
as it cannot be upgraded/installed in its present form.
cheers,
Ron
-- System
mplate conversion operator with T = Variant(&) (and doing
bad recursive things in less stripped code) when temporaries are created
for the function call.
The simple answer to me is get rid of the warning, the code operates
intuitively correctly now, but things are rarely simple...
cheers,
Ron
--
ble as a result of old habits and/or old code.
cheers,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
one
of the *_default_colors functions.
But of course there may be more to this that I miss...
cheers,
Ron
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/ba
unctions.
But of course there may be more to this that I miss...
cheers,
Ron
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12
Locale: LANG=C, L
n the
back-burner (along with similar code in the wacom module)
while I wait for him to settle on a solution that he is
happy with.
I'll try to make some time to look into that again soon
(but if anyone has relevant pointers, I'd be grateful for
any advance clue on how this is evolving).
mewhat
in tatters if this all really is a result of that
change. But perhaps I'm missing part of the bigger
picture.
best,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 07:02:25PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 03:50:07AM +0100, Ron wrote:
> ...
> > I was poking at the use of terminal default colours today and
> > ran into what looks like a bug in assume_default_colors.
> >
> > If it
Updated in cvs now, pending for the next upload. Thanks!
Ron
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 06:44:17PM +0930, Clytie Siddall wrote:
> Package: cpad-kernel
> Version: 0.9-6
> Severity: minor
> Tags: l10n, patch
>
> The Vietnamese translation for debconf: cpad-kernel
--
To UNS
heck this again next time. In the meantime, this
one is also committed locally and now pending a new upload.
best,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 05:39:31PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 09:21:29PM +0930, Ron wrote:
> > Package: libncurses5
> > Version: 5.4-4
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > doing something like, for example, mvwpr
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 12:24:43AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 01:27:05PM +0930, Ron wrote:
> > I'll be happy to make and test a patch if there is agreement on
> > a desirable remedy. Who (else) would I need to convince to make
> > tha
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 08:01:49AM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jun 2005, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
> >On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 01:27:05PM +0930, Ron wrote:
> >>I'll be happy to make and test a patch if there is agreement on
> >>a desirable remedy.
e detailed analysis of exactly what is
going wrong on what sort of systems.
Is anyone else (not) seeing this?
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
Thanks for maintaining this package, and please do keep an eye out
for the other 850+ definitions should they become available to us. :-)
cheers,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hange it as I'm
sure you'll actually get it fixed slightly quicker if you don't
have to delete that first ; )
cheers,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
appen
here, but the current behaviour does not seem very useful if an app
wishes to permit writing to the lower right cell, _and_ check for errors
that may be reported by libncurses.
I have a vague memory of some historical issue related to this, but
can't pin it down for the moment.
ntitled to support. If you
are actually using it, there is no excuse not to be aware of
these things. See above.
Thanks again to all the rest of you with tireless patience.
We'll have it out and here as soon as humanly possible.
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
, so we should be able to untaint the source package
without too much trouble.
I'm preparing a new upload with just this fix now.
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If someone submits a patch to the bts showing what it should do,
that would be helpful. Emacs is a bit too close to, er, AI ...,
for me. I'm a student of the dark side, so I'll take this one
on advice.
thanks,
Ron
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 11:43:34PM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
ing on a new binutils release to fix some known
issues, if you can track down the cause of this, I can update likewise,
but I don't have time to chase this myself in the immediate near future.
thanks,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e offending files removed and should
replace 2.4.2.6 without affecting any dependent packages. The m68k
buildd seems to be the biggest hurdle remaining for that now.
thanks,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. (and mine) ie. do not even think about whining to them
if your favorite package has disappeared and you are only just
reading this now. (or me, really)
Sorry to those of you you maintain a package that needed this.
I'll try to keep the down time as short as possible.
Ron
--
T
I guess that answers one question from the much longer reply
I just sent you :-) missing vtable bodes ill for a binary
compatible fix.
bogus #pragma interface here? or something more insideous?
If its the former, we have the choice of backporting the changes
from 2.6 to disable them -- or we cou
yone else confirm this?
it worked ok for me under wine, but I don't think I tested the last
one on a native install.
Did it fail with apps built using the compiler from the same package,
or something else?
cheers,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "un
the one in the dist is not with the new compiler
package that you built.
I guess we'll need a conflict against the earlier runtime too,
thanks,
Ron
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 05:06:29PM +0800, Paul wrote:
> Ron wrote:
> >On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 03:45:33PM +0800, Paul wrote:
> &g
you wanted to hear, but 2.5 is still very
much 'bleeding edge' by any honest assessment and it's taking us a
while to get everyone into the mindset that will see it stabilise.
If you need something more than that, let me know and we should
coordinate things with the other maintainers
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 11:32:48PM +0100, Mikael Magnusson wrote:
> Package: mingw32
> Version: 3.3.1.20030804.1-1
> Severity: normal
>
> When I use libtool to link with -lstdc++ it produces a
> command line with some references to /home/ron, which isn't a local
>
mises about what will actually make it past the post...
best,
Ron
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 02:01:47AM -0800, Ken Harris wrote:
>
> Yeah, something is definitely wrong. It does appear to be returning a
> string from _windows_.new_Printout() in _windows.py (if you print
> type(newobj
instant
> > it is actually ready.
>
> Is there any chance to get 2.6 before "freeze"?
Have you read what is already posted to the bts about this?
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it responsibly. The more you waste
my time on this, the longer that will (obviously) take to happen.
And the more likely that wx2.6 will languish in unstable with
serious unsolved bugs too.
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 12:53:01AM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote:
> > This is not a symptom tracking system, and there is no bug
> > in the 2.4 package that the above solution applies to.
>
> Except for that when you upgrade 2.4 it *fails*.
As it should. You have a broken package on your system it
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 10:21:15PM +0200, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> Closing this Bugreport do not solve the issue that there IS a conflict
> to wxpython2.5.3. Moreover the conflict is only in the newest package
> libwxgtk2.4-python_2.4.2.6.1 as libwxgtk2.4-python_2.4.2.6 was
> coexisting fine with the
I
get a good (enough) one squirted out, I'll get it in the
upload queue.
Cheers!
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
g their
own agenda.
I don't always have time to repeat them, and I'm not your
bloody grad student, so go do your own homework and quit
whining like a fool here you ungrateful twit.
Thanks!
Ron
(official mascot to the clueless)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
Package: libexif-dev
Version: 0.6.9-5
Severity: normal
Subject says it all really,
cheers,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
f these two would be preferred by native readers.
thanks,
Ron
On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 10:52:42PM +0200, Miroslav Kure wrote:
> Package: wacom-tools
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: l10n, patch
>
> Hi, in attachement there is initial Czech translation (cs.po) of
> wacom-too
on, including an upload yesterday, a large share of my
recent general in-mail, and evidently some neurons inside my head too.
I've added this to local cvs now, it will be a part of the next upload.
Thanks a lot (to the both of you ;-),
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT
ber of higher
priority (and lower level) issues that need to be fixed to give that
a stable base, so it may be a little while still.
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 06:17:42PM -0400, Balbir Thomas wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 01:04:23PM +0930, Ron wrote:
> > Hi, I'm afraid you are going to have to clarify a few things,
> > and/or do some debugging of your own here. I've just been
> > forwarded a sep
vates it.
I can win back some fairly large chunks of swap by restarting long
running memory churners, spamd and mozilla seem to be particularly
profitable in that respect, but essentially it means a 4 day reboot
cycle on the machine with this problem. :(
Is no one else seeing this?
thanks,
Ron
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 12:04:19PM +0200, J?r?me Warnier wrote:
> Le lundi 17 octobre 2005 ? 19:19 +0930, Ron a ?crit :
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 10:13:30AM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote:
> > > Makefiles in objs_gtk_{d|sh} are apparently not autogenerated at build
> > &
ith the packages. There
are very good reasons not to allow you to change some
variables once the source tree is configured. You'll find
them also in the above referenced documentation.
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Did you ever figure out what was up with this? I haven't had
any further reports of similar trouble from anyone else, so
I'm inclined to believe it was a local problem...
Can I close this bug now, or can someone reproduce it?
thanks,
Ron
On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 02:07:16PM
pair,
tp[f].red, tp[f].green, tp[f].blue,
tp[b].red, tp[b].green, tp[b].blue));
}
}
surely nothing changes the value of initialize_pair (anymore?)
between the first test and the second...
Ron
-- System Information:
Deb
tever limbo this has left them in.
Sorry about the cock-up that got them there, but I don't
think I can fix this bit myself. I think I know how not
to do it again though...
cheers,
Ron
Rejected: libwxgtk2.4-dev_2.4.4.1_i386.deb: old version (2.4.4.1.1) in
unstable >= new version (2
Package: reportbug
Version: 3.17
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
It would be nice it it was trivial to sign an outgoing
bug report, such as might be desirable when filing to
a role package like ftp.d.o requesting direct action
from other developers.
cheers,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
into testing
or kicking wx2.6 back out of it until there is one.
Sorry, testing is undergoing a lot of major transitions at
present and is known to have a few inconsistencies like this.
Hopefully they will shake out before too long.
cheers,
Ron
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 06:43:31PM -0500,
esent problems
is going to have to advise here.
Does rebuilding the packages from source locally help any?
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tag 324086 +pending
thanks for catching this one. I've fixed the cpad-kernel
package similarly now too.
Ron
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 02:28:24PM +0930, Clytie Siddall wrote:
> Package: wacom-tools
> Version: 0.6.6-8
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: l10n, patch
>
> While tra
Hi,
Install the wx-common package. I'll update the deps.
thanks,
Ron
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 10:57:48AM +0200, Martijn Pieters wrote:
> Package: libwxgtk2.4-dev
> Version: 2.4.4.1.1
> Severity: normal
>
> /usr/share/man/man1/wxgtk-2.4-config.1.gz is a symlink to wx-c
Already noted, working on fixing the build-deps now.
thanks!
Ron
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 10:37:48AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Package: mingw32-binutils
> Version: 2.16.91-20050827.1-1
> Severity: serious
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
>
&
sceptical about
it being a problem with the package (given that the
autobuilders don't have any sort of similar trouble
on other arches either ...)
thanks,
Ron
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 08:58:17PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> reopen 329072
> found 329072 2.16.91-20050827.1-1
> thanks
>
>
Hi,
Could you confirm if this is still a problem with the current
release or not?
thanks!
Ron
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:30:05AM +0930, Ron wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 02:32:08AM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote:
> > there is a problem with the binaries created by the cross-com
/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
> #4 0xb6c007e3 in g_main_loop_run () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
> #5 0xb7002ee5 in gtk_main () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
> #6 0xb75b8540 in wxEventLoop::Run () from /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2ud_core-2.6.so.0
> #7 0xb7653d6b in wxAppBase::MainLoop () from
&
ckage that this (wrong IMO) change to
gdk-imlib make uninstallable on my system though. Please
fix this and/or advise of a transition plan.
thanks,
Ron
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 12:30:31AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 03:53:18PM +0930, Ron wrote:
> > Package: gdk-imlib1
> > Version: 1.9.14-22
> > Severity: critical
> > Justification: breaks unrelated software
>
> > Unless there is
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 09:34:00AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 12 octobre 2005 ? 15:53 +0930, Ron a ?crit :
> > Package: gdk-imlib1
> > Version: 1.9.14-22
> > Severity: critical
> > Justification: breaks unrelated software
>
> Software dependi
No problem. I'll bust them up again for the next upload.
cheers,
Ron
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 05:36:33PM +0200, Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
> Package: libwxgtk2.6-0
> Version: 2.6.1.2
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hi!
>
> I'd like to ask for the libwxgtk2.6-0 package t
nce me
that _I_ should not reassign it ;-)
cheers,
Ron
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 05:20:01PM +0200, Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
> Package: wxwindows2.4
> Version: 2.4.4.1.1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hello,
>
> wxwindows2.4 FTBFS on m68k, presumably due to the use of -O3 to
> comp
the
> > debian-l10n-french mailing list contributors.
>
> It may be better with the file, sorry for the noise.
(; Thanks, will apply. :)
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Noted. Do you realise that it is already registered with doc-base
and available directly from any of the Debian documentation browsing
tools that support that?
cheers,
Ron
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 09:08:40PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> Package: wx2.6-doc
> Version: 2.6.1.2
>
tag 328990 +pending
thanks.
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:50:37AM +0200, Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
> * Ron [Mon, 19 Sep 2005 10:56:26 +0930]:
> Yep. Only, I was worried about this m68k trouble taking too long to
> get solved. It's been a while already, and until this very morning
e. 2.4 and
2.6 can coexist, but you are well out on the pointy end for testing
that with wxPython, so if anything else goes or looks weird, do
let me know.
cheers,
Ron
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 02:55:41PM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> Package: python-wxgtk2.6
> Version: 2.6.1.2
> Seve
reassign 327171 pype
Thanks Chris!
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 07:45:46PM -0500, Chris Mellon wrote:
> On 9/22/05, Chris Mellon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 9/20/05, Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > >
> > > Does anyone here use pype, or know
Thanks, I learned about this one earlier in the week,
we're looking into a fix for the next upload...
cheers,
Ron
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 06:06:29PM +0800, LUK ShunTim wrote:
> Package: wx2.6-headers
> Version: 2.6.1.2
> Severity: important
>
> There are no wxPython h
60_dont_hook_our_own_hook
unless requested to do otherwise.
cheers,
Ron
--- gpm-1.19.6/src/liblow.c.orig2005-09-05 16:29:34.0 +0930
+++ gpm-1.19.6/src/liblow.c 2005-09-05 17:09:21.0 +0930
@@ -353,28 +353,40 @@
{
/* itz Wed Dec 16 23:22:16 PST 19
t "sliding tile
puzzle" changes from where we left discussion earlier.
cheers,
Ron
--- gpm-1.19.6/src/liblow.c.orig2005-09-05 22:56:14.0 +0930
+++ gpm-1.19.6/src/liblow.c 2005-09-05 22:57:06.0 +0930
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
* Copyright 1994,1995 [EMAIL PROT
Hi,
Added to local cvs now, it will be included
in the next upload.
Thanks!
Ron
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 11:38:18PM +0900, TANAKA Atushi wrote:
> Package: wacom-tools
> Version: 0.6.6-8
> Severity: minor
> Tags: l10n patch
>
> Hello
>
> Please find attached Ja
Hi,
You'll have to forgive my initial incredulity here, but this
patch appears to be some 2+ years old. Why exactly has no one
run into this and/or reported it before now?
thanks,
Ron
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 10:34:26AM -0700, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
> Package: libapache-requ
Can anyone confirm or shed some light on this? Whatever tex2rtf other
problems may be, this seems to be a new trick it has learned.
cheers,
Ron
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 12:31:46AM +0700, Jurie Jurevich wrote:
> Package: wx2.6-doc
> Version: 2.6.1.1
> Severity: normal
> Tags:
tag 323587 +pending
thanks! it is incorporated for the next upload.
Ron
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 02:27:52PM +0200, Thomas Huriaux wrote:
> Package: wxwindows2.4
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch l10n
>
> Please find attached the french translation, proofread by the
>
sity... what went wrong there? and do we
really want to hide it??
cheers,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
t great, and even less likely to get you into
trouble or mislead you in practice. But if the links aren't helpful any
longer there is little reason to keep them...
Cheers,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to be fairly reasonably release candidates,
and that is what most people seem to need from that for now.
How big an issue do other people see this bug? What should we do about
it for etch?
Cheers,
Ron
On Mon, Dec 25, 2006 at 01:55:33PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> It seems like the waco
the number I maintain seems to be growing
slowly still.
> So, I'd recommend to remove wacom-source from sid as well.
It's going to be part of the pristine source package whatever we do,
but I'll re-evaluate the place for the module source.deb in the grand
scheme of things after e
y useful. So I'm
> downgrading this bug.
I agree, I'm not seeing anything urgent enough to justify breaking the
freeze on this package yet. Having it won't break anything for people
who don't use it, but removing it might stir a few hornets who do.
Unless something new comes
PROTECTED]:~$ ps aux | grep kfmclient
ron 10867 0.2 0.4 52816 8556 ?S12:00 0:00 kio_http
[kdeinit] http /tmp/ksocket-ron/klauncherpErE4b.slave-socket
/tmp/ksocket-ron/kfmclienth40hcb.slave-socket
ron 10872 0.2 0.4 52816 8556 ?S12:00 0:00 kio_http
[kdeinit
Package: hmake
Version: 3.12-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I did:
$ hmake -hat Main.hs -package mtl -package fgl
and I obtained:
hat-trans: /usr/local/include/hat-2.05/Data/Array/MArray.hx: openFile: does not
exist (No such file or directory)
The trivial example in
them well enough to want to migrate.
Cheers,
Ron
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 10:52:27AM -0600, Ryan Nowakowski wrote:
> Package: python-wxgtk2.6
> Version: 2.6.3.2.1.5
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
> Please package. Thanks!
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: 4.0
her translations get...
Anyway, that's the usual deal. For anyone who is really into this
sort of thing, I have some other vintage package descriptions you
could probably grate your nerves against to good effect too ...
Suggestions for those packages filed against them though please.
Cheers!
Ro
s a general rule, any time you have to rebuild everything, less source
packages Work Better.
If you have a counter-example that applies in this case, we should
consider it though. There are valid exceptions, I just don't see any
that need exercise here yet.
Best,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hi,
A fix was crafted and posted to the wxpython-dev list.
Robin vetoed it and didn't deign to discuss it further
so it fell into limbo. We might need to fix it locally
if someone really needs it...
Sorry,
Ron
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 05:38:00PM -0600, Marcin Wojdyr wrote:
> >
esume some people at least are aware of
the patterns that have followed since for external drivers.
Cheers,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reminder would certainly
be welcome here. Even if I don't forget this one again, I'd give
you pretty good odds that someone else will.
Cheers!
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ng packages, so I'm tempted to leave
it until after etch -- but I do need to reupload the existing
packages with some of the docs stripped out of the pristine
tarball, so if there are new upstream releases somewhere I'd
be happy to check them out, but you'll have to point a little
mor
in order to resolve this bug?
>
> Ron, is there any chance that mingw32 could be changed to build against the
> current gcc-4.1-source package, eliminating the need to prune these sources
> separately? Hmm, probably not a change to be making at this point in the
> release cycle... :
d like to have a rationale that I
can explain with a straight face. I'm feeling a bit thin on that front
with the pointers to offending files I've been given to date, though I
do take any claim of non-free source in my packages quite seriously
and would like to have this resolved in an endu
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 12:34:26AM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 10:04:41AM +1030, Ron wrote:
> > If use of the the invariant section is the bug here, then it appears to
> > me that in this file at least, it is quite redundant and changes nothing.
>
efore barking.
thanks!
Ron
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages lintian depends on:
ii binutils
ith the
new packages I've uploaded? I'm at a bit of a loss as to how
what you describe may have happened still...
thanks,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ugh. Does anyone see what is really up with this?
More libtool problems? Nothing much has changed since
the previous releases build-wise -- except the list of
platforms that fail to autobuild...
Its finding the lib, just not adding the relevant -I,
or so it seems.
thanks,
Ron
On Mon, Feb 14
ifferent in some important aspect
from what I (and others I presume) have been using. I can't reproduce
it myself, nor do I see anything like a likely culprit on our side of
things, can anyone else?
make-kpkg module_image works fine for me here, as does modules_config
after fixing the
t of view,
and to follow it if sane.
> as such---but they make this package different from similar
> ones, which seems unhelpful.
Indeed. Unhelpful differences bug me too. We should be able
to scratch most of these, if scratch is the word I want, without
too much trouble.
cheers,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the time it was uploaded (and indeed still works for
me with the xserver currently there too).
If you can confirm that we can consider this done and leave an
explanation for anyone else that may stumble into the same issue.
Cheers!
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
1 - 100 of 1301 matches
Mail list logo
