On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 17:22 +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
> /tmp/t2d19264/src/glade_ug.texi:373: Undefined control sequence.
> @pdfimage
> xe-arch.fig.pdf
[...]
> Output written on glade_ug.dvi (11 pages, 18936 bytes).
> Transcript written on glade_ug.log.
> /usr/bin/texi2dvi
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 05:02 -0800, Arias Hung wrote:
>
> This is a summary of all `failed' messages and warnings:
> `pdfetex -ini -jobname=latex -progname=latex -translate-file=cp227.tcx
> *latex.ini' failed
> `pdfetex -ini -jobname=etex -progname=etex -translate-file=cp227.tcx
> *etex.ini' f
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 16:35 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> prefer outlines: `true'.
> texhash enabled: `true'.
> download standard fonts (dvips): `false'.
> download standard fonts (pdftex): `false'.
> download standard fonts (dvipdfm): `false'.
[...]
> ls -ld /usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/d
Frank Küster wrote:
> Konstantinos Koukopoulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The CONTEXT distribution that is contained in the above tetex packages
>> requires the lmodern fonts in EC encoding. Unfortunately the lmodern package
>> currently in unstable contains the fonts in cork encoding.
It
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 15:26 +0100, Ralf Stubner wrote:
>
> This gives us a big problem with the lmodern package. I don't know how
> we could update lmodern without updating ConTeXt in the teTeX tree. I am
> pretty sure, that current lmodern will *not work* with the ConTe
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 07:27 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Package: tetex-doc
> Version: 3.0-11
> Severity: serious
>
> The license is clearly non-free:
>
> | All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,
> | stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by a
Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Don, 12 Jan 2006, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>> On 2006-01-02 14:01:17 +0100, Michael Eyrich wrote:
>> > Package: tetex-bin
>> > Version: 3.0-13
>> > Severity: important
>> >
>> >
>> > fmtutil fails to generate format file:
>> >
>> > fmtutil: running `tex -ini -jobname
On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 01:50 +0200, Micha Feigin wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:34:17 +0100
> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Well, we still need the output of \listfiles - or maybe just send the
> > complete logfile as an attachment, it shouldn't be too big.
> >
>
> attached
Tha
On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 01:06 +0200, Micha Feigin wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 13:14:49 +0100
> Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks. Just as Frank I can't reproduce your problem with the testfile
> > you provided. Comparing the log files, the mai
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 15:56 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> >> mpost,
> >> mpto,
> >> makempx
> >> /usr/bin/makempy (MetaPost)
> >> /usr/bin/mptopdf
> >
> > I would suggest that MetaPost is now regarded as a core component of a
> > modern TeX distribution, so I'd suggest keeping it in th
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 14:42 +0200, Michael Piefel wrote:
> Package: tetex-base
> Version: 3.0-10
> Severity: normal
>
> Fresh install fails in postinst with:
> update-language: cannot read /etc/texmf/language.d/00tex.cnf
>
> However, there is a file called 00tetex.cnf
Odd. /etc/texmf/language.
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 00:00 -0200, Rogério Brito wrote:
[...]
> * use of packages like pxfonts, txfonts, mathpazo or mathptmx.
The pxfonts and txfonts have the disadvantage of being extremly tight.
In some situations, letters can even touch each other.
> The good thing of using txfonts is that
[full quote to get back to BTS]
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 12:50 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Text-extraction from PDF is really complicated. If one adds a few
> > interesting things (fi, ä, ß) to Frank's test file, one f
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 19:20 +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
> Package: feynmf
> Version: 1.08-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> building the package feynmf in a clean sid build environment
> (with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
[...]
> mpost fmfsamp1; mpost fmfsamp2; mpost fmfsamp3; mpost fmfsamp4;
Package: tetex-base
Version: 3.0-4
Severity: minor
In teTeX 3.0-4 for Sarge from http://people.debian.org/~frank/teTeX-3.0/
there is no config file for update-updmap in /etc/texmf/updmap.d for the
fonts in tetex-base. Therefore, a large number of fonts (txfonts,
pxfonts, pazo, fpl, ...) are not av
Frank Küster wrote:
> This is at least important.
I was trying to follow /usr/share/doc/tetex-bin/README.sarge, but it
probably is not specific to the sarge backport.
> Only for people like you who use lmodern anyway...
Actually, I was missing the FPL fonts. ;-)
> I wonder how if finds _any_
Hi,
I *think* the attached config file, which I am using at the moment,
makes all fonts from tetex-base available.
cheerio
ralf
# something missing in tetex-bae :-(
MixedMap ttcmex.map
MixedMap cs.map
MixedMap hoekwater.map
MixedMap pl.map
MixedMap ccpl.map
MixedMap vnr.map
Map antp.map
Map cork
Package: tetex-base
Version: 3.0-4
Severity: wishlist
After upgrading to teTeX 3.0-4 for Sarge there are several config files
from teTeX-2.0.2 in /etc/texmf left (probably incomplete):
/etc/texmf/context/cont-cz.ini
/etc/texmf/context/cont-de.ini
/etc/texmf/context/cont-en.ini
/etc/texmf/context/
Frank Küster wrote:
> This has been fixed in tetex-base_3.0-5 which is available at
>
> deb http://people.debian.org/~frank/teTeX-3.0 experimental main
>
> and
>
> deb http://people.debian.org/~frank/teTeX-3.0 sarge main
I have just updated teTeX. Now there are 20tetex-base.cfg and
20tetex-extr
Hi,
My list of old config files was indeed incomplete. All the map files
from teTeX 2.0.2 in /etc/texmf/dvips/ where left behind, too. I already
deleted them due to the warning messages from updmap and forgot about
them before I started to look for other such files.
cheerio
ralf
--
To UNSUBSCR
Frank Küster wrote:
> This is a feature of dpkg, it seems... See also
> /usr/share/doc/tetex-base/README.Debian.gz, section 2.
Thanks, I overlooked that. If I understand it correctly, I had these old
map files in /etc/texmf/dvips for quite some while, since it was decided
between different teTeX
Frank Küster wrote:
> Now I have, and they work, and they are available at the usual place on
> people.debian.org.
ACK, everything works as expected now.
Thanks for the hard work, Frank.
cheerio
ralf
Frank Küster wrote:
> Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> /etc/texmf/dvipdfm/config
>
> This is still accessible:
>
> $ ll /usr/share/texmf/dvipdfm/config
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 2005-07-26 11:58 /usr/share/texmf/dvipdfm/config ->
> /etc/te
Package: tetex-base
Version: 2.0.2c-7
Severity: important
PSNFSS is a required part of LaTeX, but is not part of tetex-base. This
makes the LaTeX system one gets by installing tetex-base and tetex-bin
nonstandard. The required parts of any LaTeX system can be seen on
http://www.dante.de/CTAN/macro
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 09:33 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Unfortunately, latex.info is unmaintained today, and there is little
> chance to get the many errors in it fixed. There's a new effort for a
> LaTeX online documentation, but unfortunately I cannot remember the
> name.
I think you are ta
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 07:31 +0200, Jean Charles Delépine wrote:
> Package: tetex-bin
> Version: 3.0-9
> Severity: normal
Thanks for reporting.
> Got #334613 bug on upgrade.
>
> /tmp/tetex.updmap.XXQqSsSl said :
> [...]
> !!! ERROR! The map file `lm.map' has not been found at all.
>
> Eith
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 11:34 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> I think we had a very long list of TeX-related environment variables
> that were all unset in th packages of teTeX-2.0.2. And it seems to me
> as if it would be good to do this again. People might still have
> problems running latex or wh
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 14:01 +0200, Jean Charles Delepine wrote:
> Florent Rougon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait (wrote) :
>
> > BUT the lmodern package in sid moves 10lmodern.map out of the way when
> > removed (remember /var/lib/lmodern/?), therefore the map file shouldn't
> > be looked for by up
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 3.0-8.0.sarge1
Severity: normal
If one uses updmap-sys with --synctrees or --edit (and possible other
options), updmap-sys creates a new updmap.cfg in TEXMFSYSCONFIG/web2c.
With Debian, this is /usr/share/texmf/web2c, ie, TEXMFMAIN/web2c. While
update-updmap creates upd
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 15:52 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > However, the behviour of 'updmap-sys --syncwithtrees' is not correct.
> > Should I make a separate bug for this?
>
> Yes, please.
Done.
> >
[moving this to #334747 where I think it belongs.
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 17:12 +0200, Florent Rougon wrote:
> Florent Rougon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This should fix everything I am aware of, except maybe the possible mess
> > caused if you followed the 'updmap-sys --syncwithtrees' advic
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 21:23 +0200, Florent Rougon wrote:
> Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The way I see it right now, both 'updmap-sys --syncwithtrees' and
> > 'updmap-sys --edit' create '/usr/share/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg'.
&
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 16:36 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2005-10-19 15:49:07 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> > No, it isn't, since 334613 is against 3.0-9, and has only been
> > introduced by this upload. I don't know what is happening with 2.0.2,
> > and honestly I won't try to find out, sin
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 23:05 +0200, Florent Rougon wrote:
> Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > In the case where this started, the user would have been back at 'square
> > one', since updmap-sys would again try to use the still incorrect
> > /
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 11:22 +0200, Florent Rougon wrote:
> I fully agree. I may implement that in update-updmap as you suggest,
That would be great.
> if I don't feel too dizzy (pretty bad night, ugh...).
I don't think we are in a hurry with this. Especially as fmtutil-sys and
texconfig-sys m
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 12:40 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> mfw was the name of the mf binary with X11 support, mf-nowin is the name
> without. In 2.0, /usr/bin/mf was a symlink to /usr/bin/mfw, now it the
> binary itself is called /usr/bin/mf.
>
> I think this is an upstream change,
Yes, this i
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 19:46 +0200, Florent Rougon wrote:
> Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > That would be great.
>
> Done. I chose to abort to make sure the user will see the message and
> not do the same mistake in the future.
Thanks! I haven't te
merge 335055 335065
thanks
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 19:51 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Setting up tetex-bin (3.0-10) ...
> rm: cannot remove `/var/lib/texmf/web2c/*fmt': No such file or
> directory
> dpkg: error processing tetex-bin (--configure):
> subprocess post-installation script returned erro
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 21:04 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 08:52:50PM +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote:
>
> You'll need to adjust the severity of 335065 to grave first
> before merging.
Thanks.
> > > I'm also seeing problems on upgrades, but the
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 15:23 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 08:52:50PM +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for reporting. This is now fixed in our SVN.
>
> It would be nice if this got uploaded soon, since this is causing
> problems on the bui
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 18:08 +0200, Lucas Bonnet wrote:
> Package: tetex-bin
> Version: 3.0-10
> Severity: important
Thanks for reporting.
> When I apt-get dist-upgrade, or when I call updmap-sys :
> --
> updmap-sys: This is updmap-sys, version 1107552857-debian
> updmap-sys: using transcr
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 19:08 +0200, Lucas Bonnet wrote:
> It was containing bera.map, a package I installed myself. Seems like I
> get the same error than Florent mentioned in the link he posted above.
Indeed. In principle, it is always better to use /usr/local/share/texmf
for additions that are
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 11:33 +0200, Sebastien Helleu wrote:
> Package: tetex-bin
> Version: 3.0-10.1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
Thanks for reporting. From which version did you upgrade?
> download standard fonts (dvips): `false'
> download standard fonts (pdf
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 13:45 +0200, Sebastien Helleu wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 12:12:51PM +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote:
> > Thanks for reporting. From which version did you upgrade?
>
> I think from 3.0-10.
Where there any problems with version 3.0-10?
> > What is
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 14:17 +0200, Florent Rougon wrote:
> Good. Presumably, the problem was located (only) in /etc/texmf/updmap.d/
> as suspected by Ralf.
Actually, I suspect that there is a similar situation in
/etc/texmf/texmf.d/, ie, some configuration files from teTeX 2 are still
used. This
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 16:28 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> regarding tetex-bin
>
> a) #78926: If possible, it'd be nice if dvips were a seperate package,
>so that users of printfilters, e.g., don't need tetex-bin installed.
>
>[is this really a realistic scenario? How many systems are th
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 17:27 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 04:28:25PM +0200, Frank K??ster wrote:
> >>
> >> * advanced scheme
> >> ^^^
> >> Additionally, tetex-bin-nox is split into tetex-bin-mini and
> >> tetex-
Some additions
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 20:40 +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote:
> tetex-bin-extra:
> omega, aleph, omfonts, odvicopy, odvitype, otangle, otp2ocp, outocp (Omega)
mkocp (Omega)
> mpost, mpto, makempx (MetaPost)
dmp dvitomp (MetaPost)
> texexec (ConTeXt)
> pltotf, tftopl,
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 20:28 +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 16:28 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> > - PSNFSS fonts, the CM and EC fonts in Metafont and Type1 format, if
> > available.
>
> To what extend do we want internationlization? Should people
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 06:33 -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> To: Carsten Heinz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Just a reminder. In the last few days there has been a discussion on
comp.text.tex about Carsten Heinz being MIA. Several people have
unsuccessfully tried to reach him. It might be, that
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 19:51 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Do you think it should be possible to have combinations like
> "tetex-bin, tetex-base plus ConTeXt from texlive"?
Would be nice, but not strictly necessary.
> Or do you think that
> someone will want tetex-extra on top of some parts of t
Hi Paul,
thanks for reporting this problem. For whatever reason it didn't reach
our mailing list. I only saw it right now in the web interface. We had
that recently with another bugreport. Maybe these messages are simply to
large for the mailing list software?
Anyway, concerning your bug report.
Roman Bertle wrote:
> I thinks they are due to the new location of .map files in tetex3. If
> the old files cannot removed automatically during the upgrade to
> tetex3, there should be some comment in README.Debian about these
> warnings, and whether files can be removed manually.
This sounds a l
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 23:13 +0200, Arne Ahrend wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:03:42 +0200
> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > You don't, by chance, have backups of the old psfonts_t1.map
> > and/or of the updmap log file - either as
> > /var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.log, or /tmp/upd
Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> On 04.10.05 Andrei Emeltchenko ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
>> pdflatex refman.tex This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.14159-1.10b-2.1
>> (Web2C 7.4.5) entering extended mode
>> (./refman.tex{/usr/share/texmf/pdftex/config/pdftex.cfg} LaTeX2e
>> <2001/06/01> Babel and hyphenation p
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 12:39 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Sending this mail to the bug for proper archiving.
Thanks, I constantly forget this ...
> > And /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/dvipdfm/dvipdfm.def
> > looks like a part of graphics ...
>
> I don't think so:
>
> %% This is file `dvipdfm.def
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 10:26 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Usage: a2ping.pl [options] [[:] ]
> Run with --doc to read documentation as a UNIX man(1) page.
>
> This works, so there must be some internal manpage representation in the
> sources.
$ pod2man /usr/bin/a2ping a2ping.1
gives a usable
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 19:01 +0200, Arne Ahrend wrote:
> Here is tetex-extra-apt.log
> ===
> Reading Package Lists...
> Building Dependency Tree...
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
> tetex-extra
> 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgrad
Frank Küster wrote:
> Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 10:26 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>>> Usage: a2ping.pl [options] [[:] ]
>>> Run with --doc to read documentation as a UNIX man(1) page.
>>>
>>&
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 16:36 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Ok, I will add it there and chack this in later. BTW, it looks as if
> > most/all manpages in new-manpages/ are meanwhile in texk/tetex/ and
> > taken from ther
Package: dvipng
Version: 1.5-2
Severity: wishlist
Please provide a link dvigif in /usr/bin pointing at dvipng. That way,
one can create GIF files without having to resort to the '--gif' option.
cheerio
ralf
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 3.0-7.0.sarge1
Severity: minor
I just compared the list of binaries installed by tetex-bin with those
from my teTeX 3.0 installation that I compiled myself. Here are the
interesting differences:
* tetex-bin includes 'elatex' and 'pdfelatex' links. These are missing
f
Wolfram Quester wrote:
> The file is attached.
Thanks. I can't offer a solution right now, but two possible workarounds:
* The images looks as if it is created in a vector-graphics application
like xfig. In that case you could either directly produce a PDF image
from the drawing application or
Frank Küster wrote:
> Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> * tetex-bin includes 'elatex' and 'pdfelatex' links. These are missing
>> from teTeX 3.0 and actually no longer necessary, since pdfetex is used
>> for all LaTeX formats. Act
Frank Küster wrote:
> Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>>> * The links 'ofm2opl', 'opl2ofm', 'ovf2ovp', and 'ovp2ovf' (all pointing
>>>> to 'omfonts') are missing from tetex-bin.
>>>
>&g
Frank Küster wrote:
> Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>> Are we talking about the manpages or the links to 'omfonts' here?
>>
>> I was talking about the links to 'omfonts', which exist in both
>> tetex-bin_2.0.2 and teTeX 2.0.2 co
Frank Küster wrote:
> Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I had a closer look at how the necessary links are created. Most links
>> to programs (eg, texhash -> mktexlsr) are created in
>> texk/tetex/Makefile, which seems to work correctly. The links poi
Wolfram Quester wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 12:54:51PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Wolfram Quester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > After I updated to the 3.0 version from experimantal yesterday I
>> > started playing with texdoctk again and I found that if I click on
>> > Graphics -> PS/
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> apparently there are plenty of files like that one with more desperate
> notes/copyrights in them.
>
> grep "You are not allowed to change this file" * -ril | wc -l shows at
> least 33 files with such statement.
I just made the same search (32
Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> this is just a summarization of #225004 and friends.
Thanks for the summary, Hilmar. I tried to go through #225004 but
somehow got lost ...
Some comments:
[...]
> - add defoma support (?) (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) (optional)
>
> - Gnome2 integration (optional)
What does G
Hi,
I just wanted to add that I can reproduce this problem on a sarge system
with openoffice.org 1.1.3-9 an lmodern 0.92-7.
cheerio
ralf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This should be done when we go about rearranging the splitting scheme
> anyway, and in particular when we move the psnfss fonts to -base (#302035)
An easy way to include both bluesky (~3M) and psnfss (~3M) fonts without
increasing the size of tetex-base
Frank Küster wrote:
> Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Is there someting like a "required" list for fonts?
>>
>> Good question. One definitely needs CM (with additions from AMS, maybe
>> Euler, too), preferably also in Type1 forma
Frank Küster wrote:
>> BaKoMa fonts mentioned in this thread are meanwhile free, but I am
>> not sure.
>
> It seems so, see
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/06/msg00343.html
That looks good indeed. Thanks.
>>> And antp - strangely the fd files are in tetex-extra, but the
>>> afm,
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 19:15 +0400, Victor Wagner wrote:
> On 2005.10.08 at 15:28:39 +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
> > * add some hacks for tetex 2
>
> May be just add a file into source package, like README.TeTeX-2.0 as
> hint for backporters. It seems that we, who use stable with few
> backpor
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 14:11 +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> On 10.09.05 Hilmar Preusse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Last Remark,
>
> > TODO:
> >
> Do we have to provide the Adobe Font metrics of the fonts? If yes the
> packages providing the sym links has to contain the afm files too,
> which
Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> On 13.09.05 Ralf Stubner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> > - provide a file fonts.scale as explained by the Policy Par 11.8.5.
>> > (optional) Florent: "I guess you want obtain any good result
>> > without font.scale."<[EMAIL
Ralf Stubner wrote:
> Frank Küster wrote:
>> Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I had a closer look at how the necessary links are created. Most links
>>> to programs (eg, texhash -> mktexlsr) are created in
>>> texk/tetex/Makefile
Frank Küster wrote:
> Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> As one can see, I don't know yet how to build a sarge backport with
>> svn-buildpackage.
>
> Me neither, I generate the source package "by hand" from a copy of the
> tree. What&#x
Frank Küster wrote:
[svn-buildpackage and sarge backports]
> You have to run "fakeroot debian/rules sarge" before creating
> the source package. If we want to do this with svn-buildpackage, we
> would probably need a branch for sarge that differs only in that one
> command, but has to be kept sync
Package: gs-gpl
Version: 8.01-5
Severity: normal
I wanted to change what fonts gs-gpl uses when a PS file calls, e.g.,
for Times-Roman. I therefore registered a hint file with entries like:
begin /usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/urw/times/utmr8a.pfb
AFM = /usr/share/texmf/fonts/afm/urw/times/utmr8a
Marc Lehmann wrote:
[...]
> It seems that "lambda.log" is the relevant logfile:
>
> This is Omega, Version 3.14159--1.23.2.1 (Web2C 7.4.5) (INIOMEGA)
> 28 AUG 2005 11:37
> Copyright (c) 1994--2000 John Plaice and Yannis Haralambous
> **lambda.ini
> (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/config/lambda.ini
Frank Küster wrote:
> Jin-Hwan Cho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Aug 24, 2005, at 3:17 AM, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
>>
>>> I'm sending this E-Mail to the author of dvipdfm and of dvipdfmx as
>>> dvipdfm seems to be dead actually (the latest version is from 2001
>>> and in the Mail archive got 3
Package: tetex-doc
Version: 3.0-7
Severity: normal
File: /usr/share/doc/texmf/latex/xcolor/
tetex-doc should not include the xcolor documentation, which is provided
by the latex-xcolor package. Only reason why the two packages don't
clash is that latex-xcolor does not install it's documentation in
Hi,
I just wanted to add that this bug applies to latex-xcolor and
latex-beamer, too. Note however, that the tetex-doc in experimental
erroneously ships parts of the xcolor docu. See #325891.
cheerio
ralf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
Jin-Hwan Cho wrote:
> On Sep 1, 2005, at 12:13 AM, Ralf Stubner wrote:
>
> If you have the source code of DVIPDFM, check the file "pdfobj.c".
> In the line 631, the function pdf_check_name() checks the validity
> of the character "#". However, the variab
Frank Küster wrote:
> Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> tetex-doc should not include the xcolor documentation, which is provided
>> by the latex-xcolor package.
>
> Fixed in svn.
Thanks.
>> pgf's bug #301848 also applies to latex-xcolor and l
Christoph Bier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> As long as updmap called by a normal user can't write
> /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R I would except updmap called by root
> would do the job for every user, i.e. creating a correct
> /var/lib/texmf/fonts/map/pdftex/updmap/pdftex.map.
That is one of
Frank Küster wrote:
> - on a system with only one TeX user, some fonts (tfm, pfb files) were
> installed in TEXMFHOME, but the map files were in TEXMFMAIN (because
> in teTeX-2.0.2 updmap wouldn't find map files in TEXMFHOME)
OT: Was that really a problem with map files not being found? I rem
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 3.0-6
Severity: normal
The backported tetex-bin package from
http://people.debian.org/~frank/teTeX-3.0/ is uninstallable on sarge,
because it depends on
libc6 (>= 2.3.5-1)
libgcc1 (>= 1:4.0.1)
libstdc++6 (>= 4.0.1)
libxaw8
which are not available for sarge.
cheerio
r
Package: tetex-base
Version: 3.0-7
Severity: normal
The backported tetex-base package from
http://people.debian.org/~frank/teTeX-3.0/ seems to be broken. On a
sarge system, dpkg fails with
defektes Tar-Dateisystem - Packetarchiv ist defekt: Erfolg
The 'Erfolg' looks strange here, but the packag
Frank Küster wrote:
> I just tried this here, and there were no problems. Please try to
> download the file again and check whether it works then. The md5sum
> of the deb should be:
>
> $ md5sum src/Packages/pbuilder-result/tetex-base_3.0-7_all.deb
> 0c2cdd321b8f5d67edca8b6804d7fd3f
> src/Pac
Frank Küster wrote:
> Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Frank Küster wrote:
>>> Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> /etc/texmf/dvipdfm/config
>>>
>>> This is still accessible:
>>>
>>> $
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 10:13 +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
> In fact it is much more funny than this, because all expert fonts are
> completely messed up.
>
> I suspect that this is NOT a fontconfig problem, but a user app problem,
> as the do not evaluate ALL properties returned by the fontconf
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 12:05 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Hm, does anybody understand these Apache configuration directives?
> According to the comment in /etc/mime.types, "Encoding" is the correct
> thing, anyway. Ah, and apache2 in sarge declares gzip with
> "AddEncoding", not "AddType".
Whic
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 21:43 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have the impression that it is not a good idea to actually issue a
> > PostScript command such as 'a4', which is what the 'a4' papersize
> >
Hi Frank,
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 14:28 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> last May you answered in this bug. Can you check whether you think it
> still applies to TeX Live? Any documentation needed?
I will look into this, but most likely I won't have the time to do this
before Sunday.
cheerio
ralf
Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Don, 11 Jan 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
>> In TeXlive, there is no alias file at all. Is there a reason for that -
>> I think the idea is quite nice.
>
> No idea. What programs do support these aliases? All of the TL suite?
> Would be surprising ...
IIRC the alias file
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 21:20 +0100, Dieter Schuster wrote:
> Package: texlive-base-bin
> Version: 2005.dfsg.2-6
> Severity: minor
>
> After changing my tex-system from tetex to texlive, the programm
> texdoctk does not start anymore. It produces the error messages:
Thanks for your report.
> [E
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 08:23 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> texconfig and therefore the paperconfig hook do *not* control the paper
> size that is used for typesetting (i.e. when TeX runs and calculates
> where to put the characters relative to the paper origin). It only
> takes effect when a Pos
1 - 100 of 452 matches
Mail list logo
