Hi Stefan,
Wow, this is great! I have applied your bug915103-try2.diff patch and it seems
to fix the issue.
Only did some rudimentary testing so far. I have patched Apache for 2hrs now
and started to switch some crucial sites back to HTTP/2. Could not reproduce
the problem any more. Very nice!
Hi Stefan,
Confirming again that your patch from Feb 4th fixed the issue. I've got now
positive feedback from my customers and have upgraded all HTTPS-sites back to
HTTP/2.
Will this patch make it into Debian Stretch?
Thanks,
Philip
Package: apache2-bin
Version: 2.4.25-3+deb9u4
Severity: important
Tags: patch upstream
Dear Maintainer,
We got a lot of such segfaults in error.log, provoked by mod_proxy_fcgi:
[core:notice] [pid 43086:tid 139897736885440] AH00051: child pid 43114 exit
signal Segmentation fault (11)
As recomme
Dear maintainer,
I would greatly appreciate if you could push this fix into current Debian
Stretch. The problem still persists in Cyrus-imapd 2.5.10-3 and above patch
from upstream fixes it. After having upgraded a mailserver to Debian Stretch we
had a massive amount of negative customer feedba
Hi Stefan
Do you have any news about this? I had to downgrade the major part of my
customers to HTTP/1.1 because of this bug, which is quite a disaster.
I would greatly appreciate your help. Am also more than willing to pay you the
hours you spend on this.
Best regards,
Philip
> i'm still wrong:
> da1d372d0d58474f2f5a71b9acd301abf9b11bc0 is the commit on the master branch
>
> On the stretch branch, the commit
> is bee2facd9343beda10677b139cd9b2e49e986f01
Hi Cyr
Could you please shed light on where I can find commit
bee2facd9343beda10677b139cd9b2e49e986f01 for Debian
> Could you please shed light on where I can find commit
> bee2facd9343beda10677b139cd9b2e49e986f01 for Debian Stretch?
> I did not find apache2 sources on https://salsa.debian.org - Where is the
> official Debian apache2 source git repo?
> If it is not public, please attach the patch.
>
> We ar
Hi Stefan
> On 17 Dec 2018, at 22:55, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
>
> Yes, that's the problematic patch, not the fix.
>
> I have some hope that the fix for the issue is this upstream commit:
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1843468
>
> It would be nice if you could apply the at
Hi Stefan
>> On 17 Dec 2018, at 22:55, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
>>
>> Yes, that's the problematic patch, not the fix.
>>
>> I have some hope that the fix for the issue is this upstream commit:
>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1843468
>>
>> It would be nice if you could appl
> fdz96WVxhTopdug4Yu6T6nwmnFebsV90DtTQvdvPJdDumDoMp9docGx80ypkj/zE
> fDJchBn2lb2x4m8+M8kcnlm/5+/yPyjMOd0Tlk3XdJxUQX6+/Dod/cqk4ooB+hdy
> 7pjgFqBkDBu0fSktMFe2nfedTM4PUqy1BXLb42u3a3/FWaoCNK4HXsN7vbUgQQcN
> FagHrjJ1dk/GqWgoYKeE4DOsdStJxZLL7ueSvl8x49DcQnZHYEtem0DXDrRKICOD
> bK45JpDFcO8gwaGQFNhcn
10 matches
Mail list logo
