On Sun, 2014-04-27 at 22:03 +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> Please find the revised version enclosed - I believe this is good for
> the 3.4 branch in upstream evolution-data-server too:
Hi,
I'm sorry, but 3.4 is dead for upstream currently, we are more than
3 years ahead from it right now.
On Mon, 2014-04-28 at 08:45 +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> Even if there are no other fixes you plan to backport, could you
> consider making a 3.4.5 tag just with this fix?
Hi,
right, I understand the Long Term Support "models" and so on, but it's a
distribution decision. I'm not a fan of
On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 08:03 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 07:55 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > On mar., 2011-10-11 at 07:51 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > > The remaining hang problems with 3.0.3 is now claimed to be solved
> > > upstream, see below. Do you think it is
On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 09:01 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> This is what I have from you earlier as a response to the backtrace:
> (So it looks like the hang would still be there, even with the cancel
> patch (and in 3.2.x, master)! Should I reopen 660615?)
>
> --- Comment #1 from
4 matches
Mail list logo
