Dann wrote:
> Thank you for your offer. I think a relicensing would be the cleanest
> approach.
>
> Note that I am a Debian Developer, but I do not speak for the db
> packaging, release, or legal teams. I hope that they'll jump in if
> they are in disagreement with any of the statements I've ma
Sleepycat didn't, and Oracle doesn't, have any issue with the
inclusion of the documentation with Debian, for any current or
past release. The Debian team raised an issue of compatibility.
In addressing it, we agreed to use the identical license for
software and documentation.
We didn't retroacti
dann frazier wrote:
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 05:37:11AM -0700, Mike Olson wrote:
Sleepycat didn't, and Oracle doesn't, have any issue with the
inclusion of the documentation with Debian, for any current or
past release. The Debian team raised an issue of compatibility.
In address
3 matches
Mail list logo
