On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 01:31:04PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> The recent apt security updates broke the Debian derivatives census
> scripts, various sites now return "406 Not acceptable" errors.
>
> The set of instructions below produces the errors on the second apt-get
> update run with apt 0.9.7.
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 09:00:43AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 1.0.9.1
> Severity: minor
Thanks for your bugreport.
> Michael Vogt requested I file this as official bugreport:
>
> The recent revalidation changes lead to a simple apt-get update
>
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 06:10:36AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
Hello,
> On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 11:23:41 +0200, Michael Vogt wrote:
[..]
> Some comments on the points raised in the review, although it's true that
> dpkg itself should only be dealing with “trusted” data,
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 10:45:09AM -0700, Dima Kogan wrote:
> David Kalnischkies writes:
[..]
> Hi David. Thank you for looking at this. Looking a bit more deeply, it
> looks like my shell was expanding ^xxx- to a list of all files in the
> local directory, and the cause of the crash was simply to
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 09:13:00AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 1.0.4
Thanks for your bugreport.
> Hello,
>
> In our CI environment we need to use a proxy to get to most internet
> sites:
>
> http_proxy=http://squid.internal:3128
> https_proxy=http://squid.internal:3128
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 10:04:43PM +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> Hi mvo,
Hi Ian,
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 09:05:48AM +0200, Michael Vogt wrote:
> > […]
> > With this change most packages that ship a gir1.2-* package need a small
> > change to their debian/gir1.2-foo.inst
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 05:52:11PM +0200, Michael Musenbrock wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 1.0.6
> Followup-For: Bug #753297
Thanks for your patch!
[..]
> for me the problem (listing packages as upgradable if they are not) occurs
> for all
> packages, which have a newer version in an archive
Package: dpkg
Severity: wishlist
Dear Dpkg Maintainer,
apt is currently unpacking/configuring packages by running
dpkg --unpack pkg1.deb pkg2.deb ... pkgN.deb
dpkg --configure pkg1 pkg2 ... pkgN
this can be problematic for big installations when the commandline
gets very long and exceeds _SC_ARG
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 11:21:29AM +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
> # aptitude update
[..]
> Err http://ftp.tw.debian.org experimental/main i386 Packages
> 406 Not Acceptable
> Err http://ftp.tw.debian.org experimental/contrib i386 Packages
[..]
> E: Some index files failed to download. They hav
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 09:24:35PM +, ban...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: all
Thanks for your bugreport.
> Sometimes apt/dpkg can contain vulnerable, remotely exploitable bugs
> which s a big risk when used over the untrusted internet.
>
> As it happens, anyone could ha
On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 02:40:41AM +0100, Michal Szwaczko wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.82.5
> Severity: minor
Thanks!
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> Polish translation of the "News" section is still clumsy.
> (I reported it some time ago: bug #613346).
>
> Source package's po/pl.po still co
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 01:58:12PM +0330, Tsu Jan wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 11:01:29 +0100 Alexandre Detiste
> wrote:
> > This is likely a duplicate of this (read from #15), IE, not a bug:
>
> For me, in Debian Testing, the message is:
>
>
> W: Can't drop privileges for downloading as file
>
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 06:02:22PM +0330, Tsu Jan wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 12:17:45 +0100 Michael Vogt wrote:
> > This is a bug indeed, the question is how it got triggered, that dir
> > should be owend by the _apt user.
> >
> > What is the output of:
> >
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 12:26:29AM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> Package: unattended-upgrades
> Version: 0.86.4
> Severity: wishlist
Thanks for your bugreport.
I like this idea, I implemented it in:
https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades/commit/c0a9a1c429b2999bd23857149f01bae3995c840a
Hi,
I agree with the idea that after a successful install/upgrade we want to
remove the downloaded
debs. There are setups (like pbuilder) that want to keep the cache files
but those seem to be
not the common case. Attached is a quick patch to implement the removal.
We can tweak
the name and the de
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 06:47:08PM -0800, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.83
> Severity: important
> User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-6 gcc-6-no-match
Thanks for your bugreport.
> This package fails to build with GCC 6. GCC 6 has not been released
changelog:
unattended-upgrades (0.83.3) unstable; urgency=medium
[ Alexandre Detiste ]
* add Raspbian template
[ Michael Vogt ]
* Attach all dpkg log to the summary mail on minimal-upgrades-steps
mode
(closes: #759693)
-- Michael Vogt Wed, 10 Dec 2014 21:36:34 +0100
unattended
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 01:23:14PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> 2014-11-27 16:58 GMT+02:00 Martin-Éric Racine :
> > 2014-11-27 13:50 GMT+02:00 Alexandre Detiste :
> >>> Sorry, but this hardly qualifies as a log. It only shows the
> >>> intallation of one single package and a summary. :/
[..]
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 01:55:37PM +0200, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
> Le dimanche 23 octobre 2016, 13 h 43 min 59 s CEST Santiago Vila a écrit :
> > Aha! I can reproduce this too. On the machines where this happens,
> > I believe I answered "yes" to a debconf question about restarting
> > services a
On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 05:30:51PM +0100, Roderich Schupp wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> the attached patch ignores the bin-nmu suffix in the package version when
> computing getChangelogURI().
> It needs a compiler implementing C++11, though.
[..]
Thanks for the patch! It looks great. My only small concern
Hi,
I tried this from a fresh git build and can not reproduce it. Could you
please double check that
"Settings/Preferences/Marking Changes/Ask to confirm changes that also
affect other packages"
is set?
Cheers,
Michael
Hi Josh,
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 11:42:59PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Following up on this. Any chance of a version of synaptic with this
> patch included, before the freeze?
Yes, sorry. I really need a co-maintainer for synaptic :/
I uploaded this today (together with some more fixes from
Hey,
Thanks for your kind offer to help! I uploaded a new version to unstable today
that adds the patch, so if you could double check that things are good now (and
maybe close the bug if it works for you now) that would be great!
Thanks,
Michael
On Thu, May 23, 2024, at 14:45, Charles Suprin
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 10:44:31PM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.46.4-0.1
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
Thanks for your bugreport and your patch.
> Could you please apply the following patch?
> This patch is to support SH3/SH4 target.
Applied to my local t
Thanks for your bugreport and your patch, its applied to my local bzr
tree and it will be part of the next upload.
Cheers,
michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 08:11:32PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> tags 426975 pending
> thanks
>
> Quoting Clytie Siddall ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Package: apt
> > Version:
> > Severity: minor
> > Tags: l10n, patch
> >
> > The updated Vietnamese translation for the program file: apt
>
>
> Co
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 03:26:43AM +0100, Israel G. Lugo wrote:
> The bug is still present in apt version 0.6.46.4-0.1 on Debian Etch.
> This is a discrepancy from the documentation that effectively disables
> the intended functionality which is announced in the script's comments.
> An updated patc
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 06:00:24PM -0300, Savio Ramos wrote:
> Package: apt-utils
> Version: 0.6.46.4-0.1
> Severity: normal
>
> I can't create a complete archive "Packages" because:
>
> # apt-ftparchive packages ./ > Packages
> E: Invalid archive signature
> E: Errors apply to file './gcompris-d
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 10:20:18PM +0200, Thomas Geyer wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.46.4
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
> Collisions for md5 and sha1 were found allready,
> so it's likely, that in the nearer future one of them alone won't be
> safe enough.
>
> Since it is harder to find collis
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 06:25:18PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.46.4-0.1
> Severity: normal
>
> "apt-get install -t unstable gimp" wants to install gimp-help-zh-cn
> though there are no dependencies on this package, as shown below.
>
> ay:~> sudo apt-get install -t
On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 03:57:18PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.46.4-0.1
> Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.3
> Tags: patch
[..]
Thanks a lot for your bugreport and your patch. I applied it to my bzr
repository and it will be part of the next upload.
Thanks,
Michael
--
T
Package: toshset
Version: 1.72-6
Severity: normal
In Ubuntu, we've applied the attached patch to achieve the following:
* Merge from debian unstable, remaining changes:
- Fix bashism in rules file (== vs = in comparison)
We thought you might be interested in doing the same.
Cheers,
Mi
Here is the patch:
diff -u toshset-1.72/debian/changelog toshset-1.72/debian/changelog
diff -u toshset-1.72/debian/rules toshset-1.72/debian/rules
--- toshset-1.72/debian/rules
+++ toshset-1.72/debian/rules
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
autoconf
./configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=\$${prefix}/s
Package: tar
Version: 1.19-1
Severity: normal
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: origin-ubuntu hardy ubuntu-patch
In Ubuntu, we've applied the attached patch to achieve the following:
- Fix build failures with gcc-4.3 in lib/argp{-fmstream}.h
We thought you might be interested in doing the
Package: cdrdao
Version: 1.2.2-8
Severity: normal
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: origin-ubuntu hardy ubuntu-patch
In Ubuntu, we've applied the following patch:
--
diff -urNad cdrdao-1.2.2-4ubuntu1~/dao/main.cc cdrdao-1.2.2
[..]
> wow , thanks, that's a great idea. Shame that Michal didn't sent
> that to me in the first place, but I'll have a look for sure.
Just for the records, I did send the patch to you on 23 Nov 2006
(and you replied to my mail too).
Subject: [patch] apt-listchanges gtk frontend
Message-ID: <[
Package: dhcp3-client
Version: 3.0.6.dfsg-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: origin-ubuntu hardy ubuntu-patch
Hi,
I noticed that does not upgrade with
DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive. db_input does return a non-zero exit
code if it can not display a question.
The fol
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 12:26:30PM -0400, Chris AtLee wrote:
> Has anybody looked into this recently?
>
> I'd love to see this feature, but not sure if any of the discussion so
> far still applies.
There is a patch that is quite instrusive. I would currently recommend
using gdebi to install local
Hey,
because you are unable to recieve any message, the main feature of this
package is gone, so I changed the serverity to important (its useless to
have a logged-in client if you are unable to chat with anyone). Maybe it
may even be fixed in lenny, or, be as soon as posible avaible in
squeez
serverity 485409 important
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I noticed that this bug got reopened. If this still affects you, could
you please:
- check if the current 0.7.16 version of apt is installed
- if it still fails with that, could you please attach your
/etc/apt/sources.list and everything in /etc/apt/sources.list.d ?
I was not able to reprod
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 11:24:14PM +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> - have it expire in a period long enough so a new point release will
> have happened in the meantime, say half a year.
> >>> Probably still not acceptable for CD-Roms.
> >> I don't think that sho
Thanks for your bugreport and your patch.
I commited it to bzr and it will be part of my next upload. I used
os.nuname()[1] instead of socket.gethostname(). It should be equivalent,
let me know if that is not case :)
Thanks,
Michael
--
Michael Vogt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
ages that are not in any
allowed origin. Not sure if
it shold show them or not. Feedback/use cases are welcome :)
--
Michael Vogt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 07:08:10AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Deng Xiyue ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Followup-For: Bug #501253
[..]
> > Now apt-utils 0.7.19 brings back libdb4.4 again, at least on i386.
> > Hope it's just a unclean build environment. If it is the case, it'll
> > be gre
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 07:04:20PM +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> Aaron Haviland wrote:
> > There has been some recent discussion to this effect on this bug report in
> > launchpad
> > as well, as I cloned the bug report for Ubuntu.
> > (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/2482
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 10:04:24PM +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> Michael Vogt wrote:
> >> Michael, what do you think?
> >
> > I think that is a good idea to include it, its small and harmless (and
> > tested) and if we default to "false" nothing wi
Package: debconf
Version: 1.5.23
Hi,
I would like to hide the cacncel button and the close button in the
gnome frontend by default. The rational is that users often click it
when they don't have a clue what to answer.
But because "cancel" is mapped to "exit 1" this makes the maintainer
script
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 07:48:36AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Last upload of unattended-upgrades happened before the end of the call
> for translations.
>
> As a consequence, the l10n status is fairly messy, with some languages
> fixed, some not, while many translations are pending in the B
Hey,
it seems that here are some patches to fix it (end of thread):
http://groups.google.fr/group/ffmpeg-php/browse_thread/thread/a849249cd5f3fc5
May someone please fix this? It would be very nice.
Greets,
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 01:04:57AM +0200, helix84 wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Priority: wishlist
> Tags: l10n patch
> Version:
>
> .po attached
>
> ~~helix84
Thanks a lot for the translation! I overlooked this mail this is why
its not yet in the source. I commited it now to bzr and it will be
p
Sorry, just saw right now that these patch are already in the package.
But there is a new upstream-release avaiable (0.6.0) which seems to fix
these bugs.
Greets,
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 10:44:45AM +0100, helix84 wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Michael Vogt wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 01:04:57AM +0200, helix84 wrote:
> >> Package: synaptic
> >> Priority: wishlist
> >> Tags: l10n patch
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 06:49:37PM +0100, helix84 wrote:
> Thanks, updated sk.po attached.
Thanks, commited to bzr and it will be part of the next upload.
Unfortunately I saw it right after I did the 0.62.4 upload. But
I will do another one soon (its in bzr so it will not be missed :)
Thanks agai
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 07:50:34AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Package: unattended-upgrades
> Version: N/A
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch l10n
>
> Please find attached the french debconf templates update, proofread by the
> debian-l10n-french mailing list contributors.
[..]
Thanks, comm
Hi,
attached is a updated version of the fortify patch against
0.4.11.10-1lenny1.1
Cheers,
Michael
09_ubuntu_fortify_source.dpatch
Description: Binary data
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 10:14:48AM +0200, Michal Čihař wrote:
> Package: apt-utils
> Version: 0.7.14+b1
> Severity: normal
> File: /usr/bin/apt-extracttemplates
> Tags: patch
>
> Hi
>
> apt-extracttemplates complains that deb is "not a valid DEB package"
> while dpkg has no problem handling this
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 11:43:08AM +, Sam Morris wrote:
> Package: unattended-upgrades
> Version: 0.2
> Severity: important
>
> For some reason, unattended-upgrade simply would not upgrade awstats. It
> did not say why in its log files. Finally I looked at the code and saw
> it had a --debug o
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 10:51:34PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Eugene V. Lyubimkin [2008-12-12 22:17:42 CET]:
> > Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > > Yeah, that's related to building with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=noopt. I just
> > > tried again, building with noopt does resolve the segfault for me,
> > > b
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 06:41:27PM +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >
> > I think this could be fixed since the fix should be fairly trivial and
> > we could send it for pre-approval from RM team.
> >
> Ok. I will try produce a patch as soon as I have enough time.
Tha
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 02:07:14PM +1030, Clytie Siddall wrote:
> Package:apt
> Version:
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: l10n, patch
Thanks a lot for this patch (and sorry for my late reply).
> While translating the file apt, I encountered the following typos or
> issues, which I thought you migh
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 12:59:59AM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.43.3
Thanks for your bugreport.
> Apt wins the hiddeous syntax award for the day:
>
> apt-get -oDPkg::Options::=--force-overwrite install
> {debianutils,passwd}/stable
>
> It doesn't work without the
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 01:53:35AM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.57.9
> Severity: normal
Thanks for your bugreport.
> "Add downloaded packages" seems to be designed to install upgrade
> packages downloaded from a different machine.
Yes, it is the "opposite" of
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 12:23:45AM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.43.3
> Severity: normal
Thanks for your bugreport.
[..]
> test:/tmp# apt-get source jwm
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> Need to get 331kB of source archi
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 04:09:34PM +0200, Christian Pernegger wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.57.9
> Severity: normal
Thanks for your bugreport.
> I had to make a very small change to a package
> locally, so I didn't want to bump the version
> number. I then checked 'lock version' to pr
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 03:51:36PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.43.3
Thanks for your bugreport.
> One is supposed to be able to rm -fr /usr/share/doc without any
> functional consequence or change in behaviour, but the apt postinstall
> script will attempt to copy a
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 07:04:46PM +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
> The attached patch should fix the bug.
Thanks for the patch (and sorry for this very late reply)! I applied
it to my bzr branch and it will be part of the next upload.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Linux is not The Answer. Yes is the answe
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 02:21:36PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Michael Vogt a écrit :
[..]
> >What do you think about the following two tooltips to the buttons:
> >+"Generate a shell script so that you can download
> > the selected packages on a different c
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 06:07:48PM +0200, Gonéri Le Bouder wrote:
> Hello,
Hi,
> A dist-upgrade from Sarge broke my system.
> IMO, this bug severity is grave since it breaks all apt tools.
> The patch works fine.
Its in my bzr tree and will be part of the next upload.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Linu
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 07:43:07PM +0530, Toufeeq Hussain wrote:
> Subject: apt-get update fails even when $http_proxy env var is set.
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.43.3
> Severity: normal
Thanks for your bugreport.
> After upgrading the apt package in unstable, an apt-get update of my
> existing
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 08:48:29AM +0200, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 12:52:37AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 09:20:39AM +0200, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote:
> >
> > > apt-get update produces "Bad header line" messages on some files. Note
> > > that
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 02:33:31PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >From traces/trace.2063 (helper/ftp)
> (FYI, 0 and 1 are a pipe to the main apt process, 3 is a socket to the Debian
> FTP server).
[..]
Thanks for your detailed analysis.
Could you please try the attached patch and tell me if
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 07:58:37PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> Apt treats a version string with explicit zero epoch as newer than the
> same without epoch. This is contrary to policy 5.6.12.
>
> Consequences: If a package in the archive has an explicit zero epoch,
> apt always
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 10:52:36PM +0200, Adalbert Dawid wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.57.9
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
Thanks for your bugreport.
> Synaptic crashes in (at least) two cases. Steps to reproduce:
>
> 1.
> a) Open the "Repositories" dialog
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 12:21:06AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-11 05:54]:
> > Your package fails to build with G++ 4.1. I'm filing this bug as
> > important for now, but when 4.1 will be the default compiler in
> > unstable (probably in a few we
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 03:53:38AM -0400, Vermont wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.44.1
> Severity: important
>
> On a machine with 8MB of RAM and 128MB of swap, apt-get is virtually
> unusable - the building of the dependency tree causes incredible
> amounts of swap thrash. It takes apt-get
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 06:38:54AM +0200, Uwe Storbeck wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> how is this option named and where is it documented?
> I could not find it in apt version 0.6.44.1, neither in the output
> of apt-get -h nor in the manpages of apt, apt-get and apt.conf.
The support for http rate limit is
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 04:04:02PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> tags 369029 pending
> thanks
>
> Quoting Piarres Beobide ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Package: apt
> > Version: 0.6.44.1
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Tags: patch l10n d-i
> >
> >
> > Hello
> >
> > Here atached apt basque translation
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 02:36:56PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.44.1
> Severity: normal
Thanks for your bugreport.
> I find it hard to believe that this hasn't been reported already, but I
> couldn't find it anywhere... my "aptitude update" has looked like this s
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 10:33:47AM -0400, Og Maciel wrote:
> Package: Synaptic
> Version: 0.57.8ubuntu11
Thanks for your bugreport.
Please note that this is the debian bugtracker and it is about bugs in
debian packages. If you run ubuntu please use http://launchpad.net and
report the bug there.
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 05:40:08PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.44
> Severity: important
>
> After upgrading my unstable chroot, apt no longer works. I get:
>
> sh-3.1# apt-get -V update
> Get:1 http://ftp.de.debian.org sid Release.gpg [189B]
> Hit http://ftp.de.d
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:05:14PM -0700, David Liontooth wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.43.3
> Severity: important
Thanks for your bugreport.
> apt 0.6.44 has serious problems -- due to "apt pdiff support from
> experimental
> merged"?
Can you please attach the output of:
# apt-get u
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 03:15:54AM +0100, Barrie Millar wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.44
> Severity: important
Thanks for your bugreport.
> After upgrading to the newest version of Apt shown above, running "apt-get
> update" results in the following error.
>
> Reading package lists...
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 11:00:51AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Michael Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-11 10:56]:
> > Can I get a backtrace of the crash please?
>
> What do you mean exactly? A strace?
The crash in the http method is strange because the code in the
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 12:57:50PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Michael Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-11 12:18]:
> > > What do you mean exactly? A strace?
> >
> > The crash in the http method is strange because the code in there
> > didn't chang
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 11:16:55AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Yavor Doganov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > At Thu, 11 May 2006 08:22:12 +0200,
> > Christian Perrier wrote:
> > >
> > > Indeed, lots of other languages weren't activated there.
> >
> > Hm, I think it only has to be added to
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 02:25:09PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Michael Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-11 13:36]:
> > > > If it segfauls a gdb backtrace (if possible).
> > > apt-get itself doesn't segfault - it just prints an error. Or is
> > >
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 08:58:44PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> tags 366849 pending
> thanks
>
> Quoting Jacobo Tarrio ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Package: apt
> > Version: 0.6.43.2
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Tags: l10n patch
> >
> > It is attached to this bug report.
>
>
>
> Commited and p
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 08:54:43PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> tags 365448 pending
> thanks
>
> It seems that I missed this translation update for whatever reason.
>
> After applying it and syncing with the repository, here's the file. It
> still has 8f1u but it's a bit more complete..:-)
>
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 12:59:42AM -0700, C.Y.M wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.44
> Severity: important
Thanks for your bugreport.
> When I type "apt-get source", apt fails on the following:
>
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree... Done
> E: Unable to parse package
Hi,
could you please check if this problem still exists with the latest
apt (>= 0.6.44)?
Thanks,
Michael
--
Linux is not The Answer. Yes is the answer. Linux is The Question. - Neo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 08:15:07PM -0700, David Liontooth wrote:
> Michael Vogt wrote:
> > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:05:14PM -0700, David Liontooth wrote:
> > Can you please attach the output of:
> > # apt-get update -o Debug::PkgAcquire::Diffs=true
> >
> Tha
Hi,
I looked into wajigs code and it turns out that the problem is that
the latest apt uses MMap inside the pkgTagFile that is used on a pipe
from wajig. This obviously does no longer work. I'll investigate what
can be done about it. See #350025 for the rational of that change.
There are better
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 06:48:04AM +1000, Graham Williams wrote:
> Received Sat 13 May 2006 5:51am +1000 from Michael Vogt:
> > I looked into wajigs code and it turns out that the problem is that
> > the latest apt uses MMap inside the pkgTagFile that is used on a pipe
>
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 10:11:46PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> reopen 355404
> found 355404 1.68-1
> thanks
Thanks for your bugreport.
> I've started to notice that this bug is still present, perhaps a pango
> or X update caused it. I get crashes trying to open the file menu and
> the same crash I
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 05:33:44PM -0400, Michael Marsh wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.44
> Severity: important
Thanks for your bugreport.
> I'm not sure if this is a problem in apt or in aptitude (I'm guessing the
> former), but as files in /var/lib/apt/lists get updated, their permission
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 06:36:37PM +0200, Miroslav Kure wrote:
> Package: apt
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: l10n, patch
> Hi,
>
> in attachement there is updated Czech (cs.po) translation of apt.
Thanks for the translation update. Merged in my tree and will be part
of the next upload.
Cheers,
M
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 02:04:05PM -0600, David Mosberger-Tang wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.44
> Tags: patch
[..]
Thanks for your bugreport and your patch, I uploaded a new version
(0.6.44) fix today.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Linux is not The Answer. Yes is the answer. Linux is The Question
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 10:54:56PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Michael Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-11 22:32]:
> > > Do you want access to this SPARC system or should I mail the -sparc list?
> >
> > If someone from the sparc team could have a look th
we have a bzr branch for this now:
http://people.ubuntu.com/~mvo/bzr/apt/apt--install-recommends/
Next is to announce it on debian-devel and start a discussion. And
enable it :)
Cheers,
Michael
--
Linux is not The Answer. Yes is the answer. Linux is The Question. - Neo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
601 - 700 of 998 matches
Mail list logo
