On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 09:29:26PM -0700, Chuck Williams wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.57.5.1
> Severity: grave
Thanks for your bugreport.
> I'm tracking Etch. My last regular upgrade obtained version 0.57.5.1 of
> synaptic. I can no longer run the package at all as it segfaults on
>
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 11:20:32PM +0200, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.41
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
Thanks for your bugreport and your patch.
> The attached patch adds support for the armeb architecture to apt.
I added it to my apt--mvo--0 baz archive and it w
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 06:55:27PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
[..]
> The fix is obvious: if WorkSpace is greater than zero,
> seek to one less than WorkSpace bytes in the constructor (if WorkSpace
> is zero, do nothing). The attached patch does just this, and eliminates
> the bug on unstable f
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 02:22:13PM +0200, Marc GASNOT wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.57-2
> Severity: wishlist
Thanks for your bugreport.
> Default search by description and name is very slow and it provides too
> many results most of the time.
> Search by name only is generally suffic
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 09:06:41AM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> package: synaptic
> severity: wishlist
Thanks for your bugreport.
> It would be great if one could open locally stored .deb files in synaptic
> and choose to install them with all their dependencies.
> Something like a graphical
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 02:36:19AM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.57-2
> Severity: normal
Thanks for your bugreport.
> Synaptic doesn't seem to honor Package upgrade behaviour (default
> distribution) to display package descriptions, at least when the default
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 01:38:13PM -0400, grok wrote:
[..]
> Long ago, apt-get should have incorporated something along the lines of
> the wget '--limit-rate' command-line switch, as has been mentioned
> earlier. It has always been an obvious priority (and I need not get into
> why) -- but has con
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 07:31:11PM +0200, Dino wrote:
> Package: scite
> Version: 1.64-1
> Severity: important
Thanks for your bugreport.
> My scite is unusable... while i'm typing everything in the "textbox"
> flies throw it :x
> i have take a screenshot.. i think a move would be better to unde
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 07:50:24PM +0200, B. Zhang wrote:
> I found http://wiki.debian.net/?HowToGetABacktrace and did a backtrace.
>
> ---
> # MALLOC_CHECK_=2 gdb synaptic
[..]
thanks for your strace and your gdb backtrace. It looks like there is
a
Hi,
I was not able to reproduce this problem on my up-to-date sid
system. Could you please check if it is reproducable with:
"apt-get install aspell-es"
(or "apt-get install --reinstall aspell-es")
If so, could you switch your locale to english as language so that the
error message is a bit more
Hi,
it looks like this FTBFS is caued by building it with "-Os". This
seems to exclude the __buildin_* intrinsics that are used for memcmp
(#define memcmp __buildin_memcmp).
Cheers,
Michael
--
Linux is not The Answer. Yes is the answer. Linux is The Question. - Neo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 11:57:58AM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.40.1
> Tags: patch
> Followup-For: Bug #321799
Thanks for your bugreprort and thanks for the patch. I fixed that
problem in my apt--fixes--0 branch.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Linux is not The Answer. Yes is
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 08:37:50PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> Package: libapt-pkg-dev
> Version: 0.6.40.1
Thanks for your bugreport.
> The PrvIterator class lacks a default constructor, making it rather tricky
> to use them in contexts where a default constructor is needed (for instance,
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 08:50:20AM +0200, Arne Anka wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.40.1
> Severity: wishlist
Thanks for your bugreport.
> every action of apt-get adding or removing packages should be
> loggable. something like the text shown (would remove ... would install
> additionally
Hi,
just a quick update on this bug. Robert and I converted the code to
use a internal rred method now [1]. No need to call a external ed
anymore.
The code is also cleaned up and update to apt--main--0, but the
fetcher output is still a bit strange. Testing/feedback is welcome, it
works here aga
Hi,
wouldn't a Pre-Depends on emacsen-common solve the problem?
Cheers,
Michael
--
Linux is not The Answer. Yes is the answer. Linux is The Question. - Neo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I just tried to reproduce the problem and it was enough to set
the state of exim4 to 1 in /var/lib/aptitude/pkgstates.
A "aptitude dist-upgrade" will then remove my installed postfix and
upgrade to exim4.
This is also set in the pkgstates file of Geert.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Linux is not
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:31:10PM +0200, Newbeewan wrote:
> Package: scite
> Version: 1.64-1
>
> Severity: important
> Priority: normal
Thanks for your bugreport and sorry for my slow reply.
> I just upgrade libpango1.0-0 1.8.1-1 -> version 1.8.2-1 when upgrading
> mozilla-thunderbird (unstab
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 12:07:37AM +0200, Bin Zhang wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.57.4
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> After upgrade to 0.57.4 (powerpc), synaptic doesn't start.
> I get a "Segmentation fault".
Could this be a scim problem in debian? I se
On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 03:06:35AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> Package: libxbase
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
Thanks for the patch and the NMU (and sorry for the late
reply). Things keep me busy, it's great that you did this upload for
me.
Thanks,
Michael
> Hi,
>
> I'm about to
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 12:29:48PM +, Christopher David Desjardins wrote:
>
> Package: Synaptic
> Version: 0.57.2
Thanks for your bugreport.
> When I run "apply" in Synaptic to either remove or install a package, a
> pseudo "terminal" opens up displaying symbol characters (triangles,
>
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 06:31:30PM -0400, Dieter Lucking wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.57.2-1
> Severity: important
Thanks for your bugreport. I set the "Severity" to normal because I
don't think it has a major effect on the usability of the package.
> The latest version should be the
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 12:46:45AM +1000, Cameron Horsburgh wrote:
> Package: Synaptic
> Version: 0.57.5
Thanks for your bugreport.
> I have the 'Applying Changes' text box set to close after downloading
> completes. If I change desktops while it is completing the installation
> of new packages
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 11:04:28PM +1000, Rob Weir wrote:
> Hey Michael,
Hi Rob,
> these bugs have been sitting around with patches for a while now; will
> you have time to do a vdk2 upload soon? Would you like someone to NMU
> it for you?
Thanks for the kind offer. I found some time today and
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 02:36:29PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> This also prevents langdrill (not your package) from transitioning.
Sorry for being so slow, my day job kept me busy lately. The rebuilded
packages are uploaded, vdk* should be usable again.
--
Linux is not The Answer. Yes is th
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 12:40:01AM +0400, Vladimir Volovich wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.41
> Severity: normal
Thanks for your bugreport.
> i have the following line in sources.list:
>
> deb http://mail.incase.de/cyrus22/i386/ ./
>
> when i run "apt-get update", apt reports this error:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 02:32:22PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Thursday, September 15, 2005 12:22 PM, Joerg Hoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Package: python2.4-apt
> > Version: 0.6.13.1
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > It seems that the python2.4-apt package is missing its examples. Can
>
Hi,
I debugged the same problem in synaptic recently. Here is the url:
http://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=15603
I'm currently clueless about this bug. Each mmap is unmaped (I verfied
with both strace and some debug code mmap.cc), the file handles are
closed. But apparently it's not freed.
Dear Friends,
here is another update on the status of this bug. The current version
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]/apt--pdiff--0 [1] works well for my
little tests so far. I put some packages (build against current sid) at:
deb http://people.debian.org/~mvo/apt/pdiffs /
It's build with a new soname. I don
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 04:05:55PM +0300, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.40.1
> Severity: important
Thanks for your bugreport.
> I get errors like these when running "apt-get update":
>
> Failed to fetch
> ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/non-free/source/Source
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 01:09:09PM +0200, Max Kellermann wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.40.1
Thanks for your bugreport.
> apt requires sgmltools-lite to compile, but this build dependency is
> missing. Output from a failed build without sgmltools-lite:
I'm unable to reproduce your proble
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 04:05:55PM +0300, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.40.1
> Severity: important
>
> I get errors like these when running "apt-get update":
>
> Failed to fetch
> ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/non-free/source/Sources.gz
> Sub-process bzip2 re
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 08:52:50AM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.40.1
> Priority: wishlist
Thanks for your bugreport.
[..]
> Please provide an apt-secure manpage, for example, which describes
> what signature verification (what 'security' does it pr
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 04:04:31PM +0100, Mark Crean wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.57.4
> Followup-For: Bug #309969
Thanks for your bugreport
> Synaptic 0.57.4 segfaults when started with gksu -u root either from a
> menu or from a console. Starts OK with sudo synaptic or just plain sy
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 09:13:08PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> Hi !
Hi,
> This bug report seems dead. Is https support for apt abandonned ?
There is a baz branch of apt with https support:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/apt--http-ssl--0 at
http://people.ubuntu.com/~mvo/arch/ubuntu
You will need the "baza
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 05:54:02PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 11:34:17AM +0200, Michael Vogt wrote:
> > It would be nice if you could write a manpage (preferably in XML like
> > the other man pages).
>
> Ok. How about the attached
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 12:08:09AM +0200, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> Package: apt-utils
> Version: 0.6.40.1
> Severity: wishlist
Thanks for your bugreport.
> when I first found apt-ftparchive and it's generate command I hade a
> quite hard time to figure out how the conf-file needs to look like so
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 09:14:09PM +0200, Kai-Martin wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.57.4
> Severity: normal
Thanks for your bugreport.
> After a forced downgrade of a package it is automatically marked "upgrade".
> It should marked "installed" instead.
Do you mean that after you dow
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 03:38:17PM +1000, danni wrote:
> Yeah I am able to reproduce these results more testing has revealed the
> following.
>
> Synaptic will not start with either kdesu or gksu so I don't think these have
> anything to with it.
> I can use synaptic as root only if I start usin
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 01:47:27PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> could you maybe take a look at my patch in the BTS to allow using
> [TRUSTED] as vendor tag in sources.list for implizitly tursted
> repositories?
Sorry, I haven't looked at it yet (lack of time). If you haven't heard
from me
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 12:29:03PM -0400, Edward C. Jones wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.57.2-1
Thanks for your bugreport.
> In my KDE menus, System -> Synaptic Package Manager has started most of
> the versions of synaptic that I have run. For the current version of
> synaptic, nothi
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 08:41:53PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 11:55:15PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
[..]
> > I've tested this (with the accompanying one-line patch to aptitude where
> > it calls DoInstall()), and after a conversation with Michael in which we
> > fixed up s
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 01:16:11PM +0200, Christian Pernegger wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.57.2-1
> Severity: minor
Thanks for your bugreport.
> [Please note that all UI item names are translated from German]
>
> Synaptic's setting for the "upgrade mode" (Settings -> General tab)
>
arch}/python-apt/python-apt--mvo/python-apt--mvo--0/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]/patch-log/patch-69
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+Revision: python-apt--mvo--0--patch-69
+Archive: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+Creator: Michael Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+Date: Mon Aug 8 15:10:03 CEST 2005
+Standard-date: 2005-08-08 13:10:03 GMT
+Mo
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 02:17:53AM +0100, Benjamin Jacobs wrote:
> Actualy, I did run in the "Description Too Long" message for
> texlive-latex-extra package. Obviously, the solution is to change the
> static char descrBuffer[8192] for a growable buffer: assign it a
> reasonnable value (8k seems to
Hi,
sorry for being coming in so late. Here is a patch that should fix the
problem by making the buffer grow dynamically. Please give it testing.
Just to double the buffersize does only buy us time, the code that
deals with BigBuf is broken in serveral ways.
Cheers,
Michael
diff -Nru /tmp/PbNj
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 10:56:52AM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 08:49:26AM +0100, Jens Seidel wrote:
> > If the buffer needs to be longer by one than Bins you probably also need
> > +if (Bins.length() >= sizeof(Buffer))
>
> Good catch, thanks!
>
> Updated patch attac
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 02:33:23PM +0200, Jan Fricke wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.57.11
> Severity: wishlist
Thanks for your bugreport.
> Please show the reverse dependencies for a package.
> As a work-around one can try to deinstall a package,
> and see which packages will additional
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 02:53:32PM +0100, Lars Lindner wrote:
> Hi
Hi,
> I experience the same problem with synaptic 0.57.11. It always reports
> this critical warning but works without problems otherwise:
>
> # synaptic
>
> (synaptic:1291): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_tree_view_unref_tree_helper:
> a
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 06:38:31PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.57.11
> Severity: normal
Thanks for your bugreport.
> Escape doesn't work in most/all dialogs.
[..]
Sorry, but I can't reproduce this. For me all dialogs but the
preferences dialog closes when ES
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 03:13:23PM +0200, Mgr. Peter Tuharsky wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.57.11
Thanks for your bugreport.
> I have the system default language set to sk_SK. I switched it back to
> english "fort this session only" in GDM before starting GNOME. Synaptic
> is only pa
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 08:42:53PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> It seems that gpgv has been split in it's own package.
>
> Could you change the Depends to gpgv? Or maybe gpgv | gnupg?
The "apt-key update" command used in the postinst of d-a-keyring needs
a fully working gpg. This shou
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 01:37:17PM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.53.4-6
Thanks for your bugreport.
> I used the context menu to mark totem-gstreamer for installation. I
> then pressed C-g to mark all upgrades. Doing so unmarked
> totem-gstreamer. It would be better
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 06:38:32PM -0200, Ivan Paganini wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.53.4-6
> Followup-For: Bug #289574
Thanks for your bugreport.
> After the last update via apt-get the tool bar is completely empty. Even
> if you change the options to "Only-Text" to "Only-buttons" or
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 01:16:55PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.5.27
> Severity: minor
>
> I tried finding out why apt-get source doesn't work for me (bug report
> on its way), but couldn't, even after looking at like 4 apt manpages
> (apt, apt-get, apt.conf, apt
On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 01:13:13PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> Hello,
Hi,
> Just did what the report said should be done. A diff is attached.
Thanks for your patch! I applied it and it will be part of the next
release.
> Regards,
> Thierry
thanks,
Michael
--
Linux is not The Answer.
Just a additional note (sorry for not mentioning it in my inital mail):
The bw-limit patch is in my tla/baz tree at:
http://people.ubuntulinux.org/~mvo/arch/work
as arch branch: "apt--bwlimit--0".
thanks,
Michael
--
Linux is not The Answer. Yes is the answer. Linux is The Question. - Neo
-
On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 02:03:07AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 11:09:34PM +0100, Mario Lorenz wrote:
>
> > Despite previous assertions to the contrary
> > (see eg. #118780), the no_proxy environment variable is not
> > always properly honored.
>
> I believe mvo was look
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 09:58:15AM +0100, Pierre Ancelot wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.53.4-6
> Severity: important
Thanks for your bugreport.
> Freezes the _whole_ KDE when you do something as synaptic starts...
> whenever it's before the password prompt or after, just before or at t
On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 05:50:52PM +0100, jjluza wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.55+cvs20041119-1
> Severity: normal
Thanks for your bugreport and sorry for my (very) late reply. This
bugreport somehow slipped through.
> I have tried to download the changelog of the package named smarts
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 05:53:57PM -0500, A Costa wrote:
> Package: gnome-commander
> Version: 1.0.1-1
> Severity: minor
Thanks for your bugreport.
> Current:
> "GNOME Commander is a file manager aimed at people that wants an efficent
> and"
>
> Corrected:
> "GNOME Commander is a file manag
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.10.27
The attached patch adds the following information to the reports of
--status-fd (and updates the man-page):
Errors are reported as:
`status: $pkg : error : extend-error-message
Configuration file conflicts are reported as
`status: conffile-prompt: $conffile : 'cur
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 08:51:33PM +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
Thanks for your bugreport and for your patch.
> When building 'synaptic' on amd64 with gcc-4.0,
> I get the following error:
I commited your patch to svn. it will be part of the
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 12:37:28AM +1100, Andree Leidenfrost wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.55+cvs20050218-1
> Severity: wishlist
Thanks for your bugreport.
> Dear Synaptic maintainers
>
> Synaptic is an excellent tool with great usability and really showcases
> the power of Debian pac
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 01:35:26AM +0100, Nikolaus Schulz wrote:
> Hi Michael,
Hi Nikolaus,
> Michael Vogt wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 12:32:55AM +0100, Nikolaus Schulz wrote:
> > > stumbling across a typo in the german welcome screen, I happened to fix
> > >
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 09:09:17PM +0100, Nikolaus Schulz wrote:
> Hi Michael.
Hey Nikolaus,
> Michael Vogt wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 01:35:26AM +0100, Nikolaus Schulz wrote:
> > > I have checked these errors and skimmed the entire new catalogue to some
> >
ce Version"
> @@ -1227,7 +1227,7 @@
> "remove; %s will be freed"
> msgstr ""
> "%i Pakete aufgelistet, %i installiert, %i defekt, %i werden installiert/"
> -"aktuallisiert, %i werden entfernt, %sB werden frei"
> +"aktualisiert, %
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 01:46:09PM +0100, Roland Lammel wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.53.4-6
> Followup-For: Bug #297025
>
> Exact same problem here, latest updates where gtk and
> libbonobo, which might have caused this problem.
>
> Install of packages without dependenicy resolving wo
Hi Gustavo,
I got a bugreport from a user about a left-over lockfile from gksu. I
attached a patch that implements locking in the same way as
apt/synaptic use it. It should be more robust but also it has the
drawback that it will not work on nfs homedirs that don't support
locking and read-only ho
rsion that
+supports the "escape" capability)
+
+ -- Michael Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 9 Feb 2007 18:49:12 +0100
+
ucf (2.0017) unstable; urgency=low
* Bug fix: "ucf: spelling errors", thanks to Matt Taggart (Closes: #395444).
diff -Nru /tmp/qt62XW0P0Q/ucf-2.
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 09:41:17PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.57.11.1
> Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.3
> Tags: patch
Thanks for your bugreport and the patch.
> Your package fails to build with GCC 4.3. Version 4.3 has not been
> released yet but I'm building with
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 12:49:22AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.46
> Severity: grave
Thanks for your bugreport.
> #_> aptitude -u
> ... upgrade ...
> #_> aptitude -vvv upgrade
> Reading package lists... Error!
> E: Unable to parse package file /var/lib/dpkg/statu
[..]
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 12:49:22AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> #_> aptitude -u
> ... upgrade ...
> #_> aptitude -vvv upgrade
> Reading package lists... Error!
> E: Unable to parse package file /var/lib/dpkg/status (1)
> E: The package lists or status file could not be parsed or opened.
>
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 06:31:36PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 12:04:48AM +0200, Michael Vogt wrote:
> > --- apt-pkg/tagfile.h 2006-09-30 20:50:41 +
> > +++ apt-pkg/tagfile.h 2006-09-30 21:35:25 +
> > @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@
This should probably be done via the "unattended-upgrades"
packages. It is saver to use then just runing dist-upgrade.
--
Linux is not The Answer. Yes is the answer. Linux is The Question. - Neo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 08:27:51AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Ross Boylan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=apt says
> > trying to update apt from 0.6.46 to 0.6.46.1 (candidate is 2 days old)
> > * apt is only 2 days old. It must be 10 days old
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:29:46PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> Changing this would allow installs to not have the whole dependency
> tree of gnupg, while still providing the upgrade path that the recent
> upload of apt was done to provide.
>
> [Upgrades would install debian-archive-keyring, whic
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 11:43:36AM -0400, Mike O'Connor wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.44.2
> Severity: wishlist
Thanks for your bugreport.
> the sources.list(5) manpage only lists instructions for setting up
> deb lines for "full" repositories (those with
> dists/[release]/[section][binar
On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 04:18:18AM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.45
> Severity: minor
Thanks for your bugreport.
> Sometimes apt wants to install apache2-mpm-prefork libapache2-mod-php4
> for me, when I update the system. But there is really no need to do this
> and
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 04:37:24PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
[..]
> Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?]
> Writing extended state information... Done
> Reading package fields... Done
> Reading package status... Done
> Retrieving bug reports... Done
> debconf: unable to initialize frontend: Dialog
> de
Just my 0.02¢
I think this packages (as it is now) is not suitable for debian anyway
and should be removed or re-done with the data of the debian archive
(instead of the data of the ubuntu archive).
The same utility that is used to extract icons/desktop files in ubuntu
could be used for the debia
Hi,
I did a implementation for this in my "apt--install-recommends" bzr
branch. It will check for newly added recommends (or rather Important
dependencies) on the upgrade (comparing to the currently installed
version) and installs them.
Feedback is welcome. GlobOr is currently missing, I'm still
While I agree that apt should be more careful in checking if the proxy
that was entered is valid I think the real bug here is that apt-setup
writes a Acquire::http::proxy "false" entry. This apt configuration
variable should be either a valid proxy or not set at all.
--
Linux is not The Answer. Y
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 12:11:43AM +, peter green wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.9.14.1
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
Thanks for your patch!
> While updating the apt package in raspbian I noticed that the
> keyring related settings that we have to change have now moved into
> a new
el
>From 75ab11ae3880530c5354cc90c8d1ff0998f8146b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Vogt
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 18:50:03 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] make /etc/apt/preferences parser deal with comment only
sections
---
apt-pkg/policy.cc| 4
apt-pkg/tagfile.cc
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 11:56:50AM +0100, Thomas Bechtold wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.9.14.1
> Followup-For: Bug #728500
Thanks for your bugreport and your patch!
> I have the same problem on my system.
> The thing is that apt-get update uses the $TMPDIR variable.
> On my system, this var
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 01:29:53AM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 12:06:18PM +0100, Michael Schaller wrote:
[..]
> > - Fixed PEP8 linter issues
>
> The PEP8 stuff should be separate.
[..]
Thanks for bringing up better pep8 compliance. I think something like
the atta
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 02:05:36PM +0100, Michael Schaller wrote:
> >You can just git-send-email them to the mailing list or even push a git
> >branch somewhere.
> >
> Alrighty. Then let's stick to the bug for the time being as it
> contains already the context for the patches.
>
> See attached th
heers,
Michael
>From f84aaa308f0f79d4a1407d8fd5cd849de8d50263 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Vogt
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2013 10:06:22 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] make pep8 test part of the unittests
---
tests/test_pep8.py | 20
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
create mode 1
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 11:06:15PM +0100, Michael Vogt wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 01:09:39PM +0100, Michael Schaller wrote:
[..]
> It also adds a .travis.yml file that runs the tests. Next step is
> to actually make the pep8/pylakes test to pass :)
[..]
That is now done, my
On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 12:30:16PM +0100, Michael Schaller wrote:
> A few comments on the patches:
Thanks for your review and the points you raised.
> 1) tests/test_pep8.py
> Can you document in a comment or docstring why you ignore certain
> issues and what these issues are? This should help rea
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 11:04:47PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> (Addressed to Michael Vogt, so don't wonder, other Michael...)
[..]
> I thought we wanted to use git-dch now (meaning after I released 0.9.1) for
> changelog manipulation. I did commit 56ed099558a9f6e7137a8c113c
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 11:58:17PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 11:06:15PM +0100, Michael Vogt wrote:
[..]
> You really need to include the original copyright statement and the license
> here, otherwise you violate the license. If the original code does not
Package: pyrex
Version: 0.9.8.5-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu natty ubuntu-patch
*** /tmp/tmpa5iNkC
In Ubuntu, we've applied the attached patch to achieve the following:
* Merge from debian unstable. Remaining changes:
- Depe
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 08:15:06AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 08:02:16 +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:28:08PM +0100, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > > First issue is that allowing any protocol switch would basically
> > > introduce a
> > >
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 09:09:16PM +0100, rpr nospam wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.9.15
> Severity: normal
Thanks for your bugreport.
> Dear Maintainer, here is an example which demonstrates this bug:
>
> $ sudo apt-get remove 'libre?f?ice.*'
[..]
> The above commands show that the package
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:51:58AM +0100, AndresBurbano wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.75.13
> Severity: grave
> Tags: d-i
> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Thanks for your bugreport.
> Dear Maintainer,
>
>* What led up to the situation?
> I always develop in Debian, so
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 04:06:16PM +0100, Camaleón wrote:
> Package: squid-deb-proxy
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: l10n patch
Thanks for your bugreport and the translation!
I added it to my bzr repository and it will be part of the next
upload.
Cheers,
Michael
> Greetings,
>
> --
> Camaleón
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 11:01:53AM +0100, Jon Severinsson wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.9.14.2
> Severity: minor
Thanks for your bugreport.
> The cmdline/apt-key and vendor/debian/sources.list files are generated
> from their respective *.in file if they doesn't exist at build time,
> but t
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 07:32:32PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
Hi Guillem,
> On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 04:31:01 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Here's a small patch series implementing this, and also support for
> > control.tar and control.tar.xz, added in dpkg 1.17.6.
>
> The second patch was
101 - 200 of 998 matches
Mail list logo
