On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 08:17:54PM +0200, AKL. Mantas Kriauciunas wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-12-15 at 12:19 +0100, Michael Vogt wrote:
>
> > I changed the scroll behaviour in synaptic 0.55+. When you click in
> > the download progress table it will stop scrolling automatically. If
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 12:07:51PM +0100, Wolfram Tomalla wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.53.4-7
> Severity: normal
Thanks for your bugreport.
> Since upgrade to 0.53.4-7 the toolbar option 'Text Beside Icons' does
> not work, only the icons are displayed, no text. All the other toolbar
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 12:32:55AM +0100, Nikolaus Schulz wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.53.4-6
> Severity: minor
> Tags: patch l10n
Thanks for your patch.
> stumbling across a typo in the german welcome screen, I happened to fix
> a bunch of comparable errors in the german catalogue fi
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 06:07:29PM +, Nigel Stephens wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.53.4-6
> Severity: normal
Thanks for your bugreport.
This is a duplicate of bug
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=288445
Please see the above link for details how to solve the proble
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 12:06:15PM +, Nigel Stephens wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.53.4-7
> Severity: important
Thanks for your bugreport.
> After downloading the selected packages, the synaptic terminal does
> not appear, and the packages are not installed - I have to go use
> ano
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 10:02:04PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Both 332835 and 299380 are patched. This is really slightly urgent, as there
> is a package which is waiting to undergo the C++ transition which is waiting
> for xdb (oleo).
>
> Do you need an NMU?
Thanks for the reminder and
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 04:08:43PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Do you need help? Is there some problem with the build?
I uploaded on 2.12.2005 and the package is in NEW and waits for
processing (because the package name changed).
Cheers,
Michael
--
Linux is not The Answer. Yes is the ans
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 12:18:11PM +0100, Martin Lohmeier wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.57.6+b1
> Severity: normal
Thanks for your bugreport.
> synaptic should depend on libgnome2-perl. At the moment debconf fails to start
> the frontend Gnome and if the terminal is hidden the user can
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 04:35:02PM +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 11:26:38AM +0200, Michael Vogt wrote:
> > > The attached patch adds support for the armeb architecture to apt.
> > I added it to my apt--mvo--0 baz archive and it will be part of t
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 08:27:07PM +0100, Carsten Luedtke wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.57.5.1
> Severity: wishlist
Thanks for your mail.
[..]
> To improve the usability, synaptic could automagicaly switch to the list
> of packages which are upgradeable after the user has fetched the
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 05:05:23AM +, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.57.5.1
> Severity: minor
> Tags: l10n
Thanks for your bugreport.
> The "Settings" menu is translated to French as "Cat?gories". Cat?gories
> means...categories. This hardly reflects the use of the
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 04:35:02PM +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 11:26:38AM +0200, Michael Vogt wrote:
> > > The attached patch adds support for the armeb architecture to apt.
> >
> > I added it to my apt--mvo--0 baz archive and it will be par
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 02:16:39AM +0200, David Madore wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.41
> Severity: serious
Thanks for your bugreport.
> The --allow-unauthenticated option does not revert to the exact
> pre-0.6.27 behavior: even when this flag is passed on the command
> line, apt still fa
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 11:07:37PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.43
> Severity: serious
> Tags: d-i
Thanks for your bugreport and sorry for my late reply.
> apt needs to be updated for this year's archive key which is apparently
> the one at http://ftp-master.debian.org/z
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 01:26:26PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 02:41:30AM -0800, Joshua Rodman wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 03:01:35AM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > > Fwiw, the Release.gpg file contains two signatures now, both one with the
> > > 20
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 12:46:53PM +0100, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.43
> Severity: normal
Thanks for your bugreport.
> I've rebuilt the evolution-plugins package against DBUS from
> experimental, and this seems to confuse apt quite a bit:
>
> # echo 'evolution-plugins h
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 01:40:30AM +, Marco Verdecchia wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.43
Thanks for your bugreport.
> I run debian testing with linux kernel 2.6.11 version.
> My /etc/sources.list includes the following lines:
>
> deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ testing main cont
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 12:02:53PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
[..]
> Is there any way to switch this signature checking off?
You can run apt-get with "--allow-unauthenticated" or
APT::Get::AllowUnauthenticated=true in apt.conf
Cheers,
Michael
--
Linux is not The Answer. Yes is the answer. Lin
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 09:28:24AM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Michael Vogt wrote:
> > You can run apt-get with "--allow-unauthenticated" or
> > APT::Get::AllowUnauthenticated=true in apt.conf
>
> Thanx for the hint, but this option just changed the error
> mes
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 02:59:21AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Michael Vogt [Thu, 05 Jan 2006 23:27:40 +0100]:
> > but we need a better system for upgrades (see below).
>
> Thanks for proposing this.
>
> > I think the same. My proposal is to create a new debain-ser
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 01:13:57PM -0800, Mark Hedges wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 09:28:24AM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> > > Michael Vogt wrote:
> > > > You can run apt-get with "--allow-unauthenticated" or
> > > > APT::Get::AllowUnauthent
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 07:08:23AM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.57.6+b1
> Followup-For: Bug #336999
>
> Sorry Michael.
> Redoing the patch I changed my mind and translated to "Configuration"
> instead.
Thanks for your patch. It's in svn and will be part of the n
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 09:21:14PM +0800, Anthony Fok wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.57.7
> Severity: normal
Thanks for your bugreport.
> Hello!
>
> I just noticed that the synaptic/po/zh_HK.po file that I used to
> maintain is way out of date and obsolete. Please remove it,
> as Hon
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 10:28:08PM +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.57.5.1
> Severity: minor
> Tags: patch
>
> > Synaptic does no longer is build with "package hold" support.
> Synaptic is no longer built with "package hold" support.
Thanks, I fixed that in svn it wil
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 11:54:09AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 02:54:09AM +0200, Christophe Grandsire wrote:
> > Package: base
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > When adding packages with a menu file for the Debian menu (with Synaptic
> > or simply apt-get), the Debian menu
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 12:46:22AM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> This patch is rather trivial, but since it's my first, you might want to
> check it, particularly if the keyboard shortcut is moved correctly. What
> I tested is that Alt+r before the patch (vanilla 0.57.5.1) does nothing,
> and
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 02:53:29AM +, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.57.5.1
> Severity: minor
> Tags: l10n
Thanks for your bugreport.
> When there's an error where English synaptic would complain
> "The following problems were found on your system:"
> French version
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 09:42:26PM +0100, Olivier Ricordeau wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.57.5.1
> Severity: normal
Thanks for your bugreprt and sorry for the (very) late reply.
> Hi,
>
> I have an entry in my sources.list for which the gpg key is missing:
> deb ftp://ftp.nerim.net/de
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 06:00:04PM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.57.5.1
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> Attached is updated bg.po from SVN trunk.
Thanks a lot for your update and sorry for the (very) long reply. I
usually commit translation updates in max 1-2
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 12:32:53AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.57.5.1
> Severity: wishlist
> File: /usr/sbin/synaptic
Thanks for your bugreport.
> Saw two of
> (synaptic:5775): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_tree_view_unref_tree_helper: assertion
> `node != NULL' failed
>
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 02:21:40AM +0100, Daniel Nylander wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.57.5.1
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch l10n
Thanks for your translation update and sorry for the late reply.
> Small update to use correct translation as other package handlers.
I commited your
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 03:05:07AM +, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.57.5.1
> Severity: normal
> Tags: l10n
Thanks for your bugreport.
> When I use synaptic in French and it displays the warning "The following
> problems were found on your system:" after refreshing
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 10:57:35AM +0100, Ferenczi Viktor wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.57.6+b1
> Severity: normal
>
>
> Synaptic cannot remember root password. I enter the root password and check
> the "remember password" checkbox. Next time synaptic asks for root password
> again and
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 04:38:10AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I use the round-robin name http.us.debian.org in my apt.sources file.
> For some reason, the Sources.gz file on one or more of the mirrors is
> incorrectly constructed, or possibly I am receiving an error document.
> I have not su
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 01:04:57PM +0100, Francesco Potorti` wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.42.1
> Severity: normal
> File: /usr/bin/apt-get
>
> $ apt-get source atlas3-base/testing
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree... Done
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
[..]
Th
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 11:23:44AM +0200, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> I am reopening this bug since apt-get still doesn't seem to honor -t
> with 'apt-get source':
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp$ cat /etc/apt/sources.list
> deb http://ftp.fi.debian.org/debian/ sid main
>
> deb-src http
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 10:09:24PM +0100, Daniel Nylander wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.57.5.1
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch l10n
>
> Here is the swedish translation of Synaptic.
Thanks for your translation. I put it into my svn tree and it will be
part of the next upload.
Cheers
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 03:30:00PM +0100, Cedric Duval wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.42.3
> Severity: serious
> Justification: no longer builds from source
>
>
> Backporting apt from a sarge system, the build fails with:
>
> Compiling contrib/md5.cc to ../build/obj/apt-pkg/md5.opic
>
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 04:37:15PM +0100, Andras Korn wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.42.3
> Severity: normal
Thanks for your bugreport.
> I have a local package repository that is pieced together from many
> different sources. I don't have a signed Release file (is there an easy way
> to g
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 03:08:48PM -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> Package: libapt-pkg-dev
> Version: 0.6.42.3exp1
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
> The following code should not crash, but it does:
>
> pkgCache::VerIterator ver;
>
> if(ver.end())
> ...;
Thanks for the bugreport and
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 01:49:58PM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Thursday 02 June 2005 08:52 am, Colin Watson wrote:
> > One tricky bit is that we have to use 'aptitude search' first to figure
> > out how long the progress bar needs to be, and then pass some hairy
> > arguments to aptitude to g
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 09:15:33PM +0200, Tobias Pfeiffer wrote:
> Package: scite
> Version: 1.63-1
Thanks for your bugreport.
> I use scite with the German Umlauts ä. ö. ü and ß. I can type them the
> usual way (with the corresponding keys on a keyboard with a German
> layout). But when I try t
Thanks for your bugreport.
This problem is fixed in svn and will be part of the next upload.
--
Linux is not The Answer. Yes is the answer. Linux is The Question. - Neo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 01:18:33PM +0100, Milan Zamazal wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.55+cvs20041119-1
> Severity: normal
Thanks for your bugreport.
> Despite I have set `Direct connection to the internet' option in the
> Synaptic configuration, Synaptic still connects to the archives
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 11:56:19AM +, Andrew Ferrier wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.55+cvs20050218-1
> Severity: normal
Thanks for your bugreport.
> If I select Package/Configure... on a debconfable package with no settings to
> set right now (for example, adduser behaves like that
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 05:58:04AM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 10:33:57AM +0100, Michael Vogt wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 01:37:17PM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
> > > Package: synaptic
> > > Version: 0.53.4-6
> >
> > Thanks for
Can you still reproduce this problem with the version in sarge/sid?
--
Linux is not The Answer. Yes is the answer. Linux is The Question. - Neo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 05:06:06AM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Now that I know this frontend isn't from Synaptic...
> indeed
>
> /usr/sbin/dpkg-reconfigure -fgnome apache
> has the same problem. I quickly checked the bug list for debconf but didn't
> find this.
Thanks. Can I reassign this b
Does aptitude manage to download the correct changelog ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 01:28:58PM +0200, Newbeewan wrote:
> Package: scite
> Version: 1.64-1
> Severity: important
> Priority: normal
Thanks for your bugreport.
> It is always reproductible with any version of scite(1.62, 1.63, 1.64) and
> openoffice writer (1.1.3 and 1.1.4).
> If I copy some
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 08:17:53PM -0400, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.57-1
> Severity: normal
Thanks for your bugreport.
> The latest version of synaptic no longer has a menu entry in the KDE
> menu. As there is no functionally-equivalent KDE-native application i
Thanks for the patch aj.
I imported a (slightly modified) version using auto_ptr<> into baz at:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/apt--bts225947--0 [0].
The source is also availabe at:
http://people.debian.org/~mvo/apt/bts225947
(aptable source).
Please give it a try and tell me if it works for you.
Cheers,
M
the baz branch:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/apt--sane-timeout-handling--0 [1]
at
http://people.ubuntu.com/~mvo/arch/ubuntu
contains a fix that will implement better timeout handling for modern
archives with a global Release file. If that file fails due a timeout
apt will not try to download any other inde
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 09:04:32PM +1000, Vincent McIntyre wrote:
> Tags: patch
> thanks mate
Thanks for the patch. I put it into
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/apt--fixes--0
thanks,
Michael
> I think this is a duplicate of #67, which mdz patched in 2004,
> against 0.5.17 it seems.
>
> However the
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 11:41:13PM +0200, Bosse Klykken wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.55+cvs20050503-1
> Severity: minor
> Tags: l10n
Thanks for your bugreport.
> The Norwegian translation text of the string "Show this box next time"
> in the pop-up box appearing on first-time use of S
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 10:35:18PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Michael,
Hi Steve,
> Although vdk1 has been removed from unstable for some time, it is still
> present in sarge because it can't be removed without breaking vdkxdb. It
> would be nice if vdkxdb were rebuilt against vdk2, so that
Hi,
attached is a patch that prototypes a implemention of the new pdiffs
with index file as aba has implemented it on merkel. It works for
me(tm), but it still has some shortcomings. But I won't be able to
work on it in the next two weeks so I wanted to share the code with
you :)
The patch is aga
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 12:12:00PM +0200, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.55+cvs20050325-1
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: l10n
Thanks for your translation update.
> Please find attached the updated French translation for syaptic.
> it has been proofread by the debi
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 07:58:46PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi, I get the same behaviour.
>
> I've verified that the second entry appears because
> /usr/share/applications/synaptic-kde.desktop is also displayed in GNOME.
The problem seems to be that gnome in sarge does not honor the:
"On
Hello,
the patch to support translated descriptions from Otavio Salvador got
updated for apt-0.6 recently by Otavio and me. We would like to ask
everyone interessted to have a look at the code at:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/apt--ddtp--0.6
(http://otavio.no-ip.org/~otavio/arch/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/)
to test
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 11:37:55AM +0200, Christian Aichinger wrote:
> I've got a better fix available now in
> python-apt--debian--0.6--patch-6 and pyton--apt--0.6--patch-8 (which
> fixes the dumb error in patch-6), in [EMAIL PROTECTED] You
> can get it at
> http://greek0.net/~greek0/archives/[EMA
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 10:49:43AM +0200, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.36
> Severity: normal
> Tags: experimental
Thanks for your bugreport.
> Pinning seems to be broken with APT 0.6. I'm using GNOME 2.10 from
> experimental so I have an /etc/apt/preferences file (included b
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 05:47:38PM -0400, Edward C. Jones wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.57-2
Thanks for your bugreport.
> I run up-to-date Debian unstable on my PC. It used to be that the "New
> in depository" list would become empty after a Reload. Now the list
> doesn't become empt
Hi,
I imported the patch into baz:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/apt--http-authentication--0 [1]
the frontends (synaptic, aptitude) needs support for this as
well [2].
Cheers,
Michael
[1] at http://people.ubuntu.com/~mvo/arch/ubuntu
[2] Synaptic patch (needs a bit of polish) is at
http://people.ubuntu
Hi,
attached is a fix for this problem (also in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/apt--fixes--0). It would be nice if you
could check if it solves your problem (it's against the current
apt--main--0 branch).
Thanks,
Michael
--
Linux is not The Answer. Yes is the answer. Linux is The Question. - Neo
* looking
Hi,
I imported the patch into baz:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/apt--http-ssl--0 [1]
(against the latest apt--main--0).
Cheers,
Michael
[1] at http://people.ubuntu.com/~mvo/arch/ubuntu
--
Linux is not The Answer. Yes is the answer. Linux is The Question. - Neo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
Hi,
with apt-0.6 and it's Release.gpg/Release file checking code I'm hit
by this problem fairly regularly. Attached is a patch that adds a
special case for Release.gpg index files.
The idea is that if the Release.gpg file is too old and will be
rechecked, all other files under that prefix must
Hi,
I would like to know if this memory leak is still there with the
latest version of apt-proxy (currently 1.9.31).
I'm considering it as the base for a larger deployment but a memory
leak like this would be a pretty bad problem.
Thanks,
Michael
--
Linux is not The Answer. Yes is the answer.
Hi,
this error looks like it came from the backend server you are
using. Could you please check this? Does apt-proxy keep working after
that failure? I.e. does it allow new connections? Or does it hang?
Thanks,
Michael
--
Linux is not The Answer. Yes is the answer. Linux is The Question. - Neo
Hi,
even with the patch I send in earlier there is still a race
condition. If the debian server is updated it may happen that a
Release file is downloaded that does not match the a Package file
(because the package file was updated in the middle by e.g. a mirror
run). This is something that happen
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 09:41:44PM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.38
> Severity: important
Thanks for your bugreport.
> After the daily upgrade of my pbuilder chroot, apt_0.6.38_i386.deb
> was installed and now pbuilder always crashes with the following
> mes
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 07:10:32PM +0200, Johannes Raspe wrote:
> Package: python-apt
> Version: 0.5.10
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
Thanks for your bugreport.
> trying to install python-apt results in the following missing dependencies:
> python-apt:
> Hängt ab:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 08:41:06PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.38
> Severity: normal
Thanks for your bugreport.
> My configuration is to ask for gpg keys. This is done for the official deb
> sorces. But since 0.6.38 my Release file from my local builds is ignor
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 09:43:42AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.5.28.6
> Severity: minor
> Tags: patch
Thanks for your bugreport and your patch.
> The apt.conf(5) manual page is missing a parenthesis at the end of the
> third paragraph of the DIRECTORIES section. The att
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 09:37:28PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > > My configuration is to ask for gpg keys. This is done for the official deb
> > > sorces. But since 0.6.38 my Release file from my local builds is ignored.
> > > I
> > > singed the Release to Release.gpg: both are ignored. Ok
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 08:56:24AM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 05:47:37PM +0200, Jan De Luyck wrote:
> > On Thursday 30 June 2005 16:42, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > That's odd...it may be that the error message is misleading, though. Did
> > > you try downloading the .bz
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 07:42:54AM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 10:03:50AM +0200, Jan De Luyck wrote:
> > Package: apt
> > Version: 0.6.38
> > Severity: important
> >
> > When running apt-get update on the sources below, I get the following
> > problem:
> >
> > Failed t
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 10:39:31AM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 06:34:05PM +0100, Colin S. Miller wrote:
> > Package: apt
> > Version: 0.5.28.6
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> >
> > apt-get displays progress bars when its downloading files.
> > However, when it is exctactin
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 03:57:56PM +0200, Helmut pozimski wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.57-2
> Severity: normal
>
> I updated the sources List and then clicked "select updates", I choosed
> "intelligent updates", but no updates had been selected, but
> "apt-get dist-upgrade" found somet
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 09:38:08AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Package: apt
> > Severity: important
Thanks for your bugreport and sorry for my late reply.
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache show xfonts-scalable
> > Package: xfonts-scala
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 03:20:46PM -0600, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.55+cvs20050218-1
> Severity: wishlist
Thanks for yor whishlist report.
> The aptitude markauto feature keeps a system from accumulating
> unwanted packages, leftover cruft that is unused by anything b
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 03:46:06AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.55+cvs20050218-1
> Severity: minor
>
> seen after not using synaptic for a long time
> # synaptic
> open: No such file or directory
>
> (synaptic:5857): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_tree_view_unref_tree_helper:
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 12:49:09AM +0200, Javi wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.55+cvs20050218-1
> Followup-For: Bug #211900
Thanks for your bugreport.
> I was wondering if you could consider changing this dependency so synaptic
> depends
> on gksu|kdebase-bin.
>
> My point is: I don't n
severity 316747 whishlist
retitle 316747 Please document apt-key update in the apt-key manpage
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 04:15:10PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.38
> Severity: normal
Thanks for your bugreport.
The keyring bit is a duplicate of #316344.
Cheers,
Micha
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 03:32:11PM +0200, GOMBAS Gabor wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 12:04:01PM +0200, Michael Vogt wrote:
> > Can you please run "apt-cache policy" (without additional arguments)
> > and add the output to this bugreport? There are some known i
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 05:10:03PM +0200, Marian Dubiel wrote:
> Package: scite
> Version: 1.62-1
Thanks for your bugreport. I can't reproduce the problem here
(up-to-date sarge). I'll probably just upload 1.63 and see if that
helps.
It looks like something in the font install is broken. Do other
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 09:03:00AM +0200, Christian 'Greek0' Aichinger wrote:
> Package: python-apt
> Version: 0.6.10
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
Thanks for your bugreport and your patch.
> I've hit a segfault python-apt while trying to write a class that
> nicely encapsulates a package.
I
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 07:40:38PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > ok, i just finished the translation and eliminated the fuzzy messages.
> > It should be all ok now.
>
> Commited to my archiveMichael, you can sync yours with mine when
> you want.
Thanks a lot! I merged your archive up to
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 04:33:40PM -0700, Alexander Blazej wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.57.5.1
> Severity: normal
Thanks for your bugreport.
> Reproduce:
> Run synaptic
> Select a test package, for example "twm".
> Select Package -> Lock Version
> Select the same package (twm).
> Unse
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 02:44:11AM +0100, Eduardo Neves Heleno da Silva wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.57.4
> Severity: minor
> Tags: l10n
Thanks for your bugreport. I don't speak portuguese so I can't really
comment on the issues. My suggestion would be to either get in touch
with the l
Hi,
I just had a look at the patch and I'm afraid it does no longer work
with apt-0.6 because it does no longer download per-section Release
files but the patch depends on this.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Linux is not The Answer. Yes is the answer. Linux is The Question. - Neo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 12:53:38AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.41
> Severity: grave
> Tags: d-i
Thanks for your bugreport.
[..]
> As I understand it, there is basically no way we can build official
> Debian CDs that are signed with our archive signing key. There is also
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 09:41:32AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.41
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
Thanks for your bugreport and your patch.
> apt-ftparchive segfaults while crawling through dsc files. The attached
> patch fixes the problem.
>
> The types of the ef
Hi,
just a quick update. I have a version that seems to work in my
apt--mvo--0 tree and it will be part of my next upload to experimental.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Linux is not The Answer. Yes is the answer. Linux is The Question. - Neo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Hi,
I was pondering about this a bit and I don't think it can be
supported. The best that can be done seems to be to allow:
# apt-get build-dep evolution -t unstable
to get evolution from unstable (that should work in the next apt
upload to experimental).
The problem is that there will be package
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 04:10:59AM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> I merged this bug with the one Vincent mentioned. mdz didn't fix the bug
> in 0.5.17, but in 0.5.31, so it's normal that it is still present in
> 0.5.28.6.
> Therefore Michael's fix was unnecessary. What Michael did is
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 06:08:56PM +0200, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.42
> Severity: important
Thanks for your bugreport.
> I have a problem with a recent upgrade of apt (since 0.6.42 only, before
> it worked without segfault with exactly the same command
> line). Actual
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 06:00:04PM +0200, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> I have no idea what I'm doing wrong. So I wrote something what looks more
> reasonable than original Geller's patch to me. Am I really only one who cares
> that apt is corrupting package it downloads ? This time
> tetex-base_3
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 01:21:36PM +0200, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
> Hello,
Hi,
> I have just installed apt version 0.6.42.1 from incoming.debian.org and
> the problem is still present. This is the gdb backtrace :
[..]
Thanks for the backtrace. I used your sources.list and your parameters
to repro
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 09:22:34PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Synaptic is still segfaulting for me despite an upgrade to 0.57.5.1. It seemed
> to work fine before 0.57.5. I am running the testing distribution.
Please remove the "scim" package and try again. The backtrace
indicates that it c
1 - 100 of 997 matches
Mail list logo
