On Wed, 08 Dec 2004, Sean O'Dubhghaill wrote:
> Under normal use (running kde, konqueor etc) my kernel oops causing the
> machine to freeze requiring a hard reset. From looking at the oops
> message (which is attached) i suspect it has something to do with
> kswapd.
can you still reproduce it?
do
severity 284783 serious
thanks
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005, Sean O'Dubhghaill wrote:
> I'm now running 2.6.10 (not from unstable though it's vanilla with ac1
> patches) and I haven't had a single kernel opps since. I've attached a dmesg
> from the kernel i'm currently running. If you would like I can s
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004, Peter Walser wrote:
> I tried the new unstable kernel and cdrecord and tested all under root
> (su and sudo). Just the message changed (with the newer cdrecord).
>
> kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686=2.6.8-9
> cdrecord=4:2.0+a38-1
>
> $ sudo /usr/bin/cdrecord -dummy -v -eject -multi
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I have a motherboard with an nForce2 chipset (ASUS A7N8X Deluxe). Using
> the stock Debian kernel, I cannot enable DMA on the /dev/hda hard disk.
>
the modular-ide patch got reworked for the 2.6.10 kernel-image from
unstable, could you check if that
tags 292038 wishlist
retitle 292038 document sata device name change
thanks
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, Joerg Hoh wrote:
> I've updated from kernel 2.4 to kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686 on a computer
> with 1 SATA drive and grub had a wrong kernel boot paramter (root=/dev/hda1
> instead of /dev/sda1) and did
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Renaud Duhaut wrote:
> since I upgrade my kernel from 2.4.21 to 2.4.27, apm does not report
> anymore battery status.
>
> Result of the command 'cat /proc/apm'
> 1.16 1.2 0x03 0x01 0xff 0x10 -1% -1 ?
>
> It report no battery.
>
> If I boot on 2.4.21 it works perfectly.
> ca
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Sim IJskes wrote:
> Attached is the syslog from one reboot-crash cycle (without nmbd output).
>
> Gr. Sim
>
have you run memtest on that machine (night cycle)?
since when do you have those problems,
does it work with 2.6.10 from unstable?
thanks for feedback
maks
--
To
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Sim IJskes wrote:
> I did indeed install 2.6.10 just a few hours ago, and the problem does
> not seem to surface anymore.
ok, great. thanks for feedback.
closing your bug.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
severy 292516 normal
thanks
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005, Sudarshana Koushik wrote:
> I am unable to mount the fat32 partition in the kernel 2.6.10. However
> this problem did not exist with 2.6.7 kernel. dmesg shows an error
> saying Unable to load NLS charset cp437. I did try compiling the
> codepage 43
tags 341014 pending
stop
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 08:05:35PM +0100, Heikki Henriksen wrote:
>
> udev 0.76 failed to queue events correctly and didn't populate /dev at
> all using initramfs-tools. I only got a /dev/.udev/failed.
urggs indeed, will need another high urgency upload,
will do this aft
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 12:59:34PM -0600, Moshe Yudkowsky wrote:
> I cannot get 2.6.12 or 2.6.12 to boot because of the transition from
> devfs to udev, and the problem seems to lie with initrd.
>
initrd-tools is phasing out, if you use testing and udev 0.74
pick initramfs-tools 0.40 from unstabl
tags 341162 patch
thanks
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 01:20:18PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
>
> The mptspi module is required for at least some machines that use the mptscsih
> driver for the root device.
>
> Please bzr merge http://dannf.org/bzr/initramfs-tools
>
> (I'm new to bzr - is this the app
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 11:05:26AM +0100, giorgiove wrote:
> Package: kernel
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
>
hmm as it works for others that severity seems midly exagerated,
leave it to other d-kernel maintainer.
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: testing
tags 341393 moreinfo
stop
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 01:27:45PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Package: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686
>
> The mentioned kernel does not boot.
> It says, that IRQ routing is not possible.
> acpi=off and pci=routeirq have no effect.
what's the last error mess
please retest with latest initramfs-tools in unstable aka version 0.41.
it needs latest udev 0.76-3 too.
the various seen timing bugs should be fixed thanks to newer udev.
please add feedback to your bug report.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
please retest with latest initramfs-tools in unstable aka version 0.41.
it needs latest udev 0.76-3 too.
the various seen timing bugs should be fixed thanks to newer udev.
please add feedback to your bug report.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
please retest with latest initramfs-tools in unstable aka version 0.41.
it needs latest udev 0.76-3 too.
the various seen timing bugs should be fixed thanks to newer udev.
please add feedback to your bug report.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
please retest with latest initramfs-tools in unstable aka version 0.41.
it needs latest udev 0.76-3 too.
the various seen timing bugs should be fixed thanks to newer udev.
please add feedback to your bug report.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
please retest with latest initramfs-tools in unstable aka version 0.41.
it needs latest udev 0.76-3 too.
the various seen timing bugs should be fixed thanks to newer udev.
please add feedback to your bug report.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
clone 341559 -1
reassign -1 initramfs-tools
stop
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 01:33:10PM +0100, Hans Ekbrand wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 12:51:48PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > just saw your bugreport could you try latest initramfs-tools
> > from unstable too? would be
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 03:16:04PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 02:08:14PM +0100, Hans Ekbrand wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 01:41:01PM +0100, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> > > clone 341559 -1
> > > reassign -1 initramfs-tools
> > > st
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 03:50:46PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 15:27:35 +0100
> Maximilian Attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > Now it worked! the initrd was created and the b
tags 337318 moreinfo
stop
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005, Martin Wilck wrote:
> ramfs. This means that vital module options cannot be passed to the
> initramfs system. For my laptop I need the line "options libata
> atapi_enabled=1"
> to be able to use my CD drive.
in which file to you add that line?
>
tags 337176 moreinfo
tags 337607 moreinfo
stop
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> The generated initrd has ld.so in /lib, but no /lib64 symlink. But the ELF
> interpreter of all amd64 binaries points to /lib64. So the kernel fails to
> load /bin/sh.
>
> I'm going to try with the d
tags 340508 moreinfo
thanks
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 11:41:02PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Submitter reported additional information re initramfs-tools to d-s390
> > mailing list [1]. Most relevant information (console messa
while glancing through the ubuntu package to prepare
the udev initramfs-tools hooks move, i found this changelog entry:
--
* Added debian/patches/55-run-program.patch which stops udevd declaring
that the sky is falling just because a program can't be found, it'll
output a warning (normall
tags 337176 -moreinfo
retitle 337176 troubles due to 32-bit chroot on amd64
severity 337176 important
severity 337607 normal
retitle 337607 Boot scripts tries to use not included ?mdrun?
stop
On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 01:24:41PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> I've got good news and bad news :-
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005, Frans Pop wrote:
> Reason is that the driver mtpspi (./message/fusion/mptspi.ko) is missing
> in the initrd.
>
> Modules mptbase and mptscsih are present, but these are not loaded
> automatically by udev and are anyway not sufficient to get the partitions
> recognized.
>
please take a look at belows BUG_ON()
at a quick glance didn't find a patch for that in git-commits-list.
belows kernel has all fixes from the latest 2.6.14.3 stable.
- Forwarded message from Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Subject: Bug#341392: linux-2.6: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:1807!
Da
"Frobnication executable not found"
fi
if [ ! -e "/dev/mapper/frobb" ]; then
panic "Frobnication device not found"
fi
log_begin_msg "Starting frobnication"
/sbin/frobnicate "/dev/mapper/frobb" || panic "Frobnication failed"
log_end_msg
exit 0
.fi
.RE
.SH AUTHOR
The initramfs-tools are written by Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
.PP
This manual was written by David Härdeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
updated by Maximilian Attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
tags 339091 pending
thanks
On Tue, 06 Dec 2005, David =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=A4rdeman ?= wrote:
> I hope this is sufficient:
>
yes! :)
> > i've included some small updates to it to match current state.
> > as it's late please proof read too ;-)
>
> I'll try to find time to proofread it later this we
reassign 342057 linux-2.6
tags 342057 upstream
stop
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005, Frans Pop wrote:
> After a test in vmware installing 2.6.14-4-686 using initramfs-tools, the
> system failed to reboot.
>
> AFAICT the initrd (udev?) failed to load the BusLogic module even though
> it is included in the
tags 342387 important
stop
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 05:54:40PM +0100, yoann wrote:
> Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686
> Version: 2.6.8-16
> Severity: critical
baah works for others downgrading.
> I had an oops on my box :
looks like one of those reiserfs races,
with some chances they are fixed
On Wed, 07 Dec 2005, Stephen Gran wrote:
>
> Downgrading a bug in a Debian package with the response 'use a package
> from somewhere outside Debian' doesn't feel right somehow.
>
> I understand that the kernel team is quite busy, and you can't fix every
> bug. If this is an ongoing issue, as I
Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.6.13+0rc3-2
Severity: important
13:53 "ln -s /usr/include/linux linux/include" is not suprisingly not
enough, it goes then down to /usr/include/sys,
/usr/include/features.h, /usr/include/gnu,..
13:54 and then you get nice redef
On Thu, 08 Dec 2005, Andrew Moise wrote:
> I don't know whether this is because of initramfs-tools or udev,
> or both, but when I upgraded them together they hit a spot of trouble:
well looks like you picked a bad combination,
we have a migration from udev files to initramfs-tools
please upgra
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 04:35:23PM +, Paul Brossier wrote:
> hi
>
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 07:17:11PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > please retest with latest initramfs-tools in unstable aka version 0.41.
> > it needs latest udev 0.76-3 too.
> > the various
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, dann frazier wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:$ sudo chroot /usr/lib/klibc /bin/cat
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:$ sudo chroot /usr/lib/klibc /bin/false
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:$ sudo chroot /usr/lib/klibc /bin/true
> Segmenta
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 07:36:58PM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> Attached scsi disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0
> kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
> EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
> Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!
>
> The qla128
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 10:26:16AM +, Ricardo Ferreira wrote:
> I have the same problem. At first I thought it might be the way yaird was
> generating the ram disk, so I tried using initramfs-tools instead. This did
> not work (the error was about the same stated in other words in the boot
> pr
On Sat, 10 Dec 2005, dann frazier wrote:
> It still segfaults when compiled with gcc-3.3.
please post an strace?
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 12:24:09PM +, Ricardo Ferreira wrote:
>
> Yup, that works, at least with initramfs-tools, will try going back to yaird
> later. Any comments on using one instead of the other?
they are very different.
initramfs-tools uses udev, bb and klibc and wants max hardware supp
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 11:33:06AM -0500, Jonathan Brandmeyer wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 19:18 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > please retest with latest initramfs-tools in unstable aka version 0.41.
> > it needs latest udev 0.76-3 too.
> > the various seen timing
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 08:38:36AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 20:20 +0100, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> > ok, so the initramfs-tools bug seems to be run-init of klibc:
> > a bit hard to debug if it's not possible to get into the bb shell.
> > will
merge #258010 #245268
stop
tried the etch d-i installer on a proliant dl-385
with the cool news that grub installed without flaws.
not closing as no idea of the grub-installer version.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM
reassign 343363 kernel-package
stop
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 07:33:56PM +0100, Andrea Franzese wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686
> Version: 2.6.14-5
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Installing (or upgrading) the package linux-image-2.6.14-2-686 the
> post-in
please attach to your response output of:
dmesg > dmesg.txt
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 274167 important
stop
as the bug submitter is speaking about unstable,
he should inbetween use 2.6.14 which has a much better reiserfs,
which still needs some SuSe patch massaging.
anyway if you are bound to 2.6.8 reiserfs is not a recommended
rockstable fs.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
severity 336153 important
stop
2.6.8 is known to have an fucked md and doesn't stand heavy fileload
unless you are lucky.
the archive features now 2.6.14 please try it out,
beware that the new initramfs generating tools are still in dev
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
tags #292290 important
stop
newer xfs would have needed serious core changes in 2.6.8.
the debian kernel team had been penalized by the unforseen
long sarge core freeze.
it's very unfortunate as xfs in debian's kernel had
special attention. ext2, ext3 is recommended for 2.6.8 usage.
if you are bo
hmm i'm not shure it deserves the "critical" stamp.
anyway could you lvm2 maintainer look into that #320312.
thanks :)
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
severity 320312 normal
tags 320312 morinfo
stop
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 03:46:58PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 03:32:58PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > hmm i'm not shure it deserves the "critical" stamp.
>
> No it does not. The sys
reassign kernel-package
stop
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 03:48:55PM +0800, LUK ShunTim wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686
> Version: 2.6.14+2.6.15-rc5-0experimental.1
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
>
> After installing linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 and rebooting,
16:03 also "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" is no longer an valid mail
would be cool to polish the cluttered bottom. :)
-- Package-specific info:
** /home/max/.reportbugrc:
reportbug_version "3.8"
mode advanced
ui text
realname "maximilian attems"
email "[EMAIL PROTECTED]
reassign #337625 yaird
stop no thanks
On Sat, 05 Nov 2005, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Sounds like you had initramfs-tools and not yaird installed at the time
> of initially installing the kernel.
>
> Reassigning to initramfs-tools.
no mention of initramfs-tools in initial report.
> > Regenerati
tags 337704 moreinfo
stop
On Sat, 05 Nov 2005, Paul Traina wrote:
> You closed this bug, but it didn't fix the additional issues I reported.
> Please reopen.
>
> Paul
hurrah for opening an separate bug.
Sesse is using plain EVMS root, you seem to use an heavier mix.
your patch also seems not t
Package: debian-installer-manual
Severity: wishlist
* the chapter is out of date (not referring to the new common package).
* there are lots of other references on the topic:
- the debian-reference has an chapter about howto compile a new kernel for
your debian box
- the "Debian Linux Kernel Han
On Sun, 06 Nov 2005, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 06 November 2005 14:57, maximilian attems wrote:
> > * the chapter is out of date (not referring to the new common package).
>
> I have updated that. The new common package is now referred to for those
> arches that use the co
- Forwarded message from Erik Forsberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
"Simon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Have you found any solution to this? or any other info...
Not a solution, but we haven't experienced the problem since we went
to xfs instead of ext3, even though we're now running SMP agai
reassign 323860 linux-image-2.6-686-smp
reassign 338973 linux-image-2.6-686-smp
merge 338973 323860
stop
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 06:11:13AM +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.14-2
> Version: 2.6.14-2
> Severity: important
>
>
> The same bug as reported against earlier debian k
cher laurent :)
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Laurent Neiger wrote:
> maximilian attems wrote:
> >cher Laurent!
>
> And furthermore you know french ! Whaoo :-)
c'est une trop belle langue .. non ??
> >hmm that is an usb driver.
> >we only disabled CONFIG_USB_BANDW
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 09:59:09PM +0300, Alexander Gerasiov wrote:
>
> After installing 2.6.14 and new udev (which replace classic hotplug) I
> started to receive oops during bootup:
latest alsa has a patch for the error patch of opl3:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux
On Fri, 06 Jan 2006, Andreas Degert wrote:
> I have a fourport serial card, it is correctly detected and configured
> with the kernel from package linux-image-2.6.12-1-686-smp. The
> detected ports are ttyS4 - ttyS7 (ttyS0/1 is standard serial ports,
> ttyS2/3 not assigned).
>
> With 2.6.15 it wo
tags 346345 moreinfo
stop
On Fri, 06 Jan 2006, graziano wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a radeon M9 in my thinkpad T41 and both rovclock (radeon
> overclock) and fglrx (when I tried it) reported that the memory speed is
> 200 MHz and core speed is 252 MHz, while in radeonfb during boot reports
> the
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 06:33:18PM +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> Package: yaird
> Version: 0.0.12-3
> Followup-For: Bug #329319
>
> Hello,
>
> I have patched current yaird with Scott's patch and it really works great
> with swsup on my system. So it would great if it was included in the offici
> Please limit the swap size for the desktop scheme. A value like 256 MB
> sounds reasonable.
no that's not enough for suspend to disc there you need double of the
value.
also it's nice to have more swap for bigger apps running on desktop
boxes
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 09 janvier 2006 à 15:31 +0100, maximilian attems a écrit :
> > > Please limit the swap size for the desktop scheme. A value like 256 MB
> > > sounds reasonable.
> >
> > no that's not enough for suspen
On Sat, 07 Jan 2006, Andreas Degert wrote:
> - only ttyS0 and ttyS1 are detected by the driver
> - ttyS4 - ttyS7 are set with setserial in a boot script (which works
>for Debian kernel 2.6.12, but not Debian kernel 2.6.15)
>
> Some more search in the Internet revealed:
>
> If you look at t
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 02:09:31AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
>
> The new option in Debian Installer to automatically partition using LVM
> creates a system where / and most other partitions are on LVM, but /boot
> is a separate "real" partition.
>
> The initrd created using initramfs-tools fails
reassign grub
thanks
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Frans Pop wrote:
> retitle 347482 Does not support "!" separator in /dev/mapper names
> severity 347482 important
> thanks
>
> On Wednesday 11 January 2006 03:44, you wrote:
> > > what were the boot args?
> > > cat /proc/cmdline
> > root=/dev/mapper!Deb
reassign 347492 wine
stop
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Mau wrote:
> After upgrade to kernel 2.6.15-1 wine 0.9.5 (deb package from
> winehq.org), crossover office 4.1 and 5.0.0 stopped working: with most
> win32 apps, after launch and some input (mouse or keyboard), the whole
> system appears locked. No w
tags 347468 upstream
severity 347468 wishlist
stop
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, delicious nougat wrote:
>
> I upgraded to linux-image-2.6.15-1-686 and found that kismet no longer
> worked. Neither could I set the card into monitor mode via iwconfig or
> airmon. It's an ipw2915, which has worked more o
reassign 347328 pwc-source
stop
hello sam,
thanks for your pointer.
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, Sam Morris wrote:
> Lawrence Williams wrote:
> >I am asking for the in-kernel pwc module (Philips USB webcam) to be
> >disabled by default, as it doesn't work with the majority of their webcam
> >chipset
merge 347177 347178
stop
sending duplicate bug reports doesn't generate sympathy.
On Mon, 09 Jan 2006, Alan Baghumian wrote:
> System hangs on send/revc data with dialup connection. Simply connect
> with a dialup connection (configured with pppconfig, connected with
> pon), open a Firefox br
dear adaplas,
could you please take a look at this matroxfb debian bug report:
http://bugs.debian.org/347186
On Mon, 09 Jan 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > Sigh, can't get a break with alpha kernel support around here. After
> > > upgrading to 2.6.14 (from 2.4.27), the Matrox framebuffer no
tags 291464 moreinfo
stop
unstable has linux-image-2.6.15 can you still reproduce your trouble?
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 293195 moreinfo
stop
can you reproduce that with linux-image-2.6.15??
thanks for your feedback.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reassign 347487 kernel-package
stop
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, darren wrote:
> Package: linux-source-2.6.15
> Version: 2.6.15-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
i doubt about the severity
> make-kpkg --stem=XXX --revision=2.6.15-2 kernel_image modules_image
>
> .
> .
> .
Package: lists.debian.org
Name: debian-kernel-maint
Rationale:
current debian-kernel mailinglist is high volume.
making it hard for interested parties to participate
in our flames^Wdiscussions. separating the bug reports
from the main list would be hihgly welcomed.
the linux-2.6 package Mainters
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 10:21:39PM +0100, Kilian Krause wrote:
> Subject: mips not listed in Architectures but building fine
> Package: klibc-utils
> Version: 1.1.16-1
> Severity: normal
>
> According to the changelog of 1.1.16-1 mips was fixed:
>* Add new upstream patches for better hppa and
please try the attached patch,
should load ide-generic even if udev didn't yet bring it up:
patch -p1 /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/init-premount/udev <
ide-generic.udev.patch
for this trial please remove any ide-generic or ide-disk
out of /etc/mkinitramfs/modules, then update-initramfs -
unmerge 337497
severity 337497 important
tags 337497 moreinfo
stopped
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 02:41:51PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> Notice that there is no ide-generic module on powerpc, and never has been, so
> i fail to understand what i should test ?
>
indeed your bug report was falsly m
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 23 December 2005 14:34, maximilian attems wrote:
> > please try the attached patch,
> > should load ide-generic even if udev didn't yet bring it up:
>
> Although my initial report was for Sparc (which I will test tomorr
the bug your reported at the beginning of your bug report
regarding initramfs-tools was a timing bug by udev,
which is fixed since long.
please retest against latest 2.6.14 in unstable
usinig initramfs-tools?
thanks for your feedback.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005, Geert Stappers wrote:
> klibc-utils still fails to build from source,
> details at
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=klibc&ver=1.1.1-9&arch=sparc&stamp=1135419885&file=log&as=raw
trave11er succesfully build this on his unstable sparc machine,
could you please try to d
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 01:21:34AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> >
> > trave11er succesfully build this on his unstable sparc machine,
> > could you please try to debuild it?
>
> It did build fine ...
cool,
as expec
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005, Joey Hess wrote:
> I also see this bug, using initramfs-tools 0.44 and
> linux-image-2.6.14-2-386 (2.6.14-6).
could you try the attached hook file,
please place it under /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/init-premount/
and recreate the initramfs: update-initramfs -u
hope i
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Laurent Neiger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Since I upgraded from linux-image-2.6.12 to linux-image-2.6.14 my
> ali5451 soundcard is no more able of playing any sound...
> I've tried all the successives revisions of 2.6.14 but it really seems
> it's since the change 2.6.12/2.6.14 th
cher Laurent!
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Laurent Neiger wrote:
> first of all many thanks for your so quick answer.
:)
> Unfortunately, upgrading to 2.6.15 didn't solve my problem.
> Messages in /var/log/dmesg (or boot or syslog) are just the same, there
> is an error while loading the ali5451 modul
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.13.11
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
got bitten by moving my dev machine and forgetting to
include DEBUILD_DPKG_BUILDPACKAGE_OPTS="-I.bzr -I.bzr.backup -I.bzrignore"
to it's .devscripts.
--- dpkg-1.13.11/scripts/dpkg-source.pl.orig2005-12-29 14:31:54.0
+
tags 336103 moreinfo
thanks
please try against latest initramfs-tools version 0.46
atm in incoming.debian.org
and report back if the dma issue is fixed, ide-generic
will be loaded as last with it so this should be fixed.
please use a clean /etc/mkinitramfs/modules and
update-initramfs -u
--
mak
On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 07:16:24AM -0500, Todd Troxell wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 08:21:53PM +0200, Markus Peuhkuri wrote:
> > Package: logcheck
> > Version: 1.2.42
> > Severity: minor
> > Tags: patch
> >
> > Logcheck does not report any error if the config file is not readable
> > or does n
hello trave11er;
the sparc buildd ftbfs klibc as it is building it with BITSIZE=32
on #debian-release it was suggested that the sparc linux personality
can be set on the line of the make call.
as soon as klibc 1.1.14 is in the archive
i may try to use for SPARC:
DEB_MAKE_INVOKE = linux64 make -C
tags 328534 moreinfo
severity 328534 important
stop
please add requested further info about status with latest 2.6.14
or 2.6.15-rcX from experimental using initramfs-tools.
regards
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
tags 337974 moreinfo
severity 337974 important
stop
please retry as already requested against latest 2.6.14 in unstable
or against 2.6.15-rcX from experimental
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 04:44:37AM -0500, Todd Troxell wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 08:15:16PM +0200, Markus Peuhkuri wrote:
> > Todd Troxell wrote:
> > > I see your point. The config is not really essential.
> > >
> > > What do you think about this:
> > >
> > > if [ -f $CONFFILE -a -r $CONF
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 02:03:19PM +0200, Markus Peuhkuri wrote:
> Maximilian Attems wrote:
>
> >
> >no the debian packaging takes care of that,
> >no need to issue an error in that case.
> >if you change the permissions of the CONFFILE you are on your own.
> &g
tags 344832 moreinfo
stop
On Mon, 26 Dec 2005, General Stone wrote:
> The subject line is not correct, if any of these options
> 'ATTACKSUBJECT', 'SECURITYSUBJECT' and 'EVENTSSUBJECT' are combined in
> a report. The subject line only include the first event of a report.
> This is not so good for
hello bill,
please keep the bug report cc'ed! :)
On Mon, 02 Jan 2006, Bill Gatliff wrote:
> Maks:
>
> Still stuck on this one:
>
> mercury:~# apt-get install linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree... Done
> Suggested packages:
> linux-doc-2.6.14 lin
- Forwarded message from General Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 14:59:03 +0100
From: General Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#344832: correct subj
1 - 100 of 3756 matches
Mail list logo
