Package: wnpp
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
El dj 03 de 10 de 2013 a les 11:51 +0200, en/na Emmanuel Bourg va
escriure:
> Le 03/10/2013 11:12, Mònica Ramírez Arceda a écrit :
>
> > I hope gpsprune will build with this new version of
> > libmetadata-extractor-java. If not, I can contact gpsprune upstream to
> >
block 731009 by 709950
thanks
Hi,
El dg 01 de 12 de 2013 a les 00:02 +0100, en/na Andreas Beckmann va
escriure:
> Package: xmlstarlet
> Version: 1.5.0-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
>
> Hi,
>
> xmlstarlet FTBFS on mips
Yes
Hi gregor!
El dc 30 de 10 de 2013 a les 23:25 +0100, en/na gregor herrmann va
escriure:
> Package: dianara
> Version: 0.9-1
> Severity: minor
> Tags: patch upstream
>
> Hi Mònica!
>
> I was missing a keyboard shortcut for quitting dianara; the Session
> menu only shows Quit without any hint, tr
Hi gregor!
> Package: dianara
> Version: 0.9-1
> Severity: normal
> Tags: upstream
>
> Hi Mònica,
>
> sorry, bad bug report ahead :)
>
> Since I'm using dianara [0], it's usually running for days,
> with suspend/hibernate in between, until I reboot my laptop (or I
> build a new snapshot from gi
Logan Rosen writes:
> Package: gtkhash
> Version: 0.7.0-1
> Followup-For: Bug #744589
> User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
> Usertags: origin-ubuntu ubuntu-patch
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:
>
> * Use dh-autoreconf instead of aut
tags 554755 +patch
thanks
The attached pacth in #643403 also fixes this bug.
Thanks for your work!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * eggtrayicon.c, fbxkb.c: Replace deprecated gdk_display and GDK_DISPLAY()
+with gdk_x11_get_default_xdisplay().
+ * Link to X11 to build with binutils-gold. (Closes: #554280)
+
+ -- Mònica Ramírez Arceda Fri, 18 Nov 2011 23:46:19 +0100
tags 643413 +patch
thanks
Trying to fix this bug :-)
Thanks for your work!
Description: Format an error string to avoid a format-security
error while building.
Author: Mònica Ramírez Arceda
Last-Update: 2011-11-19
--- a/jack.dl.c
+++ b/jack.dl.c
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
void fail(char
# package ruby-fuubar: bugs ITP 624634 and ITP 697259 have different owners
owner 697259 Nilam Kadale
# package ruby-fuubar: bugs ITP 624634 and ITP 697259 are not merged
merge 624634 697259
thanks
Hi,
This ITP already exists (#624634) and is owned by Nilam Kadale
.
I'm merging these two bugs a
forcemerge 691897 691280
thanks
Hi Markus,
There is another previous ITP for ruby-subexec reported by Harshad
Waghmar. Maybe you could join efforts.
I'm merging #691897 and #691280 and setting Harshad Waghmar as the owner
because he was the first in reporting the ITP. Feel free to change this
if
El ds 10 de 11 de 2012 a les 17:40 +0100, en/na Maxime Hadjinlian va
escriure:
> >> >> * Package name: plum
Another package already in Debian is named plum:
http://packages.debian.org/sid/plum
So, it must be changed.
> Now the dumb question, to change the description, what do I do ? I
> wasn
El dg 11 de 11 de 2012 a les 14:57 +0100, en/na Maxime Hadjinlian va
escriure:
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Mònica Ramírez wrote:
> > El ds 10 de 11 de 2012 a les 17:40 +0100, en/na Maxime Hadjinlian va
> > escriure:
> >> >> >> * Package name: plum
> >
> > Another package already in Debi
Hi Hector,
There is already a package haskell-pcap in Debian:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/h/haskell-pcap.html
Since I suppose it's the same package you want to ITP,
you should close this bug :)
Cheers!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi,
According to [0], fvwm has not its corresponding ITA bug, despite
#689441 title.
Please, could you file this ITA bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0]
http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi,
According to [0], jampal has not its corresponding ITP bug. This bug is
needed because jampal has been removed from Debian.
If you want to reintroduce the package, please, could you file this ITP
bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0]
http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencie
Hi,
According to [0], mysql-tzdata has not its corresponding ITP bug.
Please, could you file it?
Thanks for your work!
[0]
http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
According to [0], szg has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite #691270
title. Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi Pekko,
If you're looking for a sponsor you should send [0] to
sub...@bugs.debian.org to generate a new bug against
sponsorship-requests.
Thanks for taking care of ovito!
[0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674283#10
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed mes
Hi,
El dc 24 de 10 de 2012 a les 20:47 -0400, en/na drew craig va escriure:
> required for Debian Packaging of Diaspora.
> This request is a resend of an earlier request.
Do you mean this is a RFP (request for package) instead of ITP (intent
to package)?
Regards.
signature.asc
Description:
Package: mawk
Version: 1.3.3-17
Severity: normal
Hi,
$ cat mawk-backslash-error.awk
!/^#/ {
gsub(/'\\'/, "''");
print;
}
$ echo "'\'" | /usr/bin/mawk -f mawk-backslash-error.awk
'\'
If I use gawk:
$ echo "'\'" | /usr/bin/gawk -f mawk-backslash-error.awk
'\\'
This issue has been
Hi,
According to [0] the package name you have chosen (Diagnostic Log and
Trace (DLT)) is not valid.
Debian Policy 5.6.1 [1] says:
"Package names (both source and binary, see Package, Section 5.6.7) must
consist only of lower case letters (a-z), digits (0-9), plus (+) and
minus (-) signs, and pe
Hi,
According to [0], sweethome3d-furnitures-nonfree has not its
corresponding ITP bug, despite #689167 title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0]
http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
Hi,
I'm closing this bug because this package is already in Debian
(experimental):
http://packages.debian.org/source/experimental/eclipse-subclipse
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi,
According to [0], there is not the corresponding ITP bug for this
package. You should file it and close it in your debian/changelog file.
Thanks!
[0]
http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian
oad.
+ * Add a manpage to shp2pgsql-gui.
+
+ -- Mònica Ramírez Arceda Sun, 15 Jan 2012 21:38:30 +0100
+
postgis (1.5.3-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Moved pgsql2shp/shp2pgsql under conventional /usr/bin path.
diff -Nru postgis-1.5.3/debian/postgis.manpages postgis-1.5.3/debian/postgis.manpages
--- po
El dj 21 de 06 de 2012 a les 11:08 -0400, en/na Tim Abbott va escriure:
> Mònica,
>
> Thanks for taking care of this bug; your patch looks good.
It's a pleasure :)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Thanks for the info and for closing the bug :)
El dc 23 de 05 de 2012 a les 18:41 -0400, en/na Lennart Sorensen va
escriure:
> I just tried 1.6.6-10 on powerpc (recompiled on squeeze) and unlike
> 1.6.6-7, it does not segfault.
>
> It does seem to not be able to determine the screen size correctl
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hi,
libtachyon-dev didn't depend on libtachyon-0.99 (see #675714). This bug affected
ovito, it failed to build. Now the bug is fixed and hopefully ovito should
build
in all architectures.
- Mònica Ramírez Arceda Mon, 20 Feb 2012 01:41:30 +0100
+
firetray (0.3.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
* [3406b26] Revert "Imported Upstream version 0.3.4"
diff -Nru firetray-0.3.6/debian/control firetray-0.3.6/debian/control
--- firetray-0.3.6/debian/control 2012-02-08 19:57:22.0
Hi,
According to [0], freeplane has not its corresponding ITA bug, despite 704789
title.
In fact, freeplane package is not orphaned:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/freeplane
You may get in touch with freeplane maintainer and ask him if he wants to
orphan this package or co-maintain it with you.
Hi Helmut,
There was already another ITP for dhcpd-pools (#631229), although it's
an old one and may be abandoned. Could you contact Asbjørn Sloth
Tønnesen and ask him if he wants to abandon or
co-maintain this package with you?
Once you've done this, you should set the right owner in both bugs
According to [0], bittwist has not its corresponding ITP bug.
Please, could you file it?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
Hi,
I've just retitled #705129 as it seems to be an ITP. Please, feel free
to fix the owner if it is not the correct one.
Thanks!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
# ITP missing for package wsgiproxy at mentors
retitle 691518 ITP: wsgiproxy -- HTTP proxying tools for WSGI apps
owner 691518 Mikhail Lukyanchenko
thanks
This package is in mentors: https://mentors.debian.net/package/wsgiproxy
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi,
Is this report a RFP (request for a package) or an ITP (intend to
package) report? The type of report should appear in the title.
Thanks!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi,
There is a previous wnpp bug with this package name (#694731), but it's
not the same package. One of the two names should be changed.
Could you change this package name or contact #694731 submitter and
decide what names are the best for these two packages?
Thanks for your work!
signature.
retitle 705735 ITP: pyscss -- a Scss compiler for Python
thanks
On Sat, 2013-04-20 at 23:34 +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> On 2013-04-20 12:42, Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote:
> > There is a previous wnpp bug with this package name (#694731), but it's
> > not the same pac
Hi,
There was already another ITP for qupzilla (#657791), although it's an old one
and may be abandoned. Could you contact Mohammed Sameer
and ask him/her if he/she wants to abandon or co-maintain this package with you?
Once you've done this, you should set the right owner in both bugs and mer
owner 657791 Georges Khaznadar
merge 657791 705972
thanks
On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 00:34 +0300, Mohammed Sameer wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 02:02:13PM +0200, Georges Khaznadar wrote:
> > Hello Mònica,
> > thank you for your scrutiny!
> >
> > Hello Mohamed,
> >
> > thanks to Mònica, I was ale
Hi,
I'm closing this bug because this package is already in Debian:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/gmsl
Regards.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
retitle 704105 ITP: desktop-base-oldies -- packages containing theming from
past releases’ desktop-base package
severity 704105 wishlist
owner 704105 Paul Tagliamonte
thanks
Hi,
I'm fixing 704105 title, owner and severity, but I'm not 100% sure
if the package name and the owner are ok, so plea
Hi,
There is already a package dtc in Debian:
http://packages.debian.org/source/experimental/dtc
But it is not the same pachage that you are trying to package.
You should rename your pakage and retitle this bug.
Regards.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
# bug 697778 has subject RFP: VLC Python ctypes bindings
retitle 697778 RFP: libvlc-bindings-python -- VLC Python ctypes bindings
thanks
I'm retitling this bug to give a name to the new requested package. Feel
free to change it if you prefer another name.
Regards.
signature.asc
Description: Thi
# package libjreen: bugs ITP 648668 and ITP 700031 have different owners
owner 700031 QutIM Packagers Team
# package libjreen: bugs ITP 648668 and ITP 700031 are not merged
merge 648668 700031
thanks
Hi,
This ITP already exists (#648668) and is owned by QutIM Packagers Team
. I'm merging these t
El dg 17 de 02 de 2013 a les 23:48 +0100, en/na Jakub Wilk va escriure:
> Hi Mònica,
>
> * Mònica Ramírez Arceda , 2013-02-17, 23:36:
> >+On Debian GNU/Linux systems, the complete text of the BSD
> >+License can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/BSD'.
>
>
Hi,
What is bug 701535 meant for? Is it an "intent to package" (ITP)? Or a "request
for package" (RFP)?
You should retitle it with the following format:
ITP|RFP: package_name -- package_description
Regards.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Hi Thomas,
This ITP already exists (#698159) and is owned by James Page
. I'm merging these two bugs and setting James Page
as the owner.
Please, contact James Page to see if he's still working
on this package or if he wants to comaintain this package with you.
Regards.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
El dl 25 de 02 de 2013 a les 23:39 +0530, en/na NiTiSH va escriure:
> Is is "intent to package" (ITP).
> How will I retitle
You should send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with the following
body content (replacing package_name and package_description with the
corresponding values):
retitle 701
Hi,
What is bug 701828 meant for? Is it an "intent to package" (ITP)? Or a "request
for package" (RFP)?
You should retitle it with the following format:
ITP|RFP: package_name -- package_description
Regards.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
El dj 28 de 02 de 2013 a les 20:02 +0400, en/na
programmer11...@programist.ru va escriure:
> 28.02.2013, 13:18, "Mònica Ramírez Arceda" :
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > What is bug 701828 meant for? Is it an "intent to package" (ITP)? Or a
> > "requ
On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 11:14 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 23:23:20 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
> > > I'm not sure if this is a problem of debbugs SOAP interface, of
> > > SOAP::Lite or just a user error; but the following simplified test
> > > script throws an error in ge
According to [0], tilda has not its corresponding ITA bug, despite #702072
title.
#583248 and #695574 show that this package is not being maintained,
but I think you should get in contact with MIA Team to ask
them to orphan tilda. Then, you could adopt it with the correspondign ITA bug.
Thank
Hi,
What is bug 702586 meant for? Is it an "intent to package" (ITP)? Or a "request
for package" (RFP)?
You should retitle it with the following format:
ITP|RFP: package_name -- package_description
Regards.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Hi,
What is bug 702584 meant for? Is it an "intent to package" (ITP)? Or a "request
for package" (RFP)?
You should retitle it with the following format:
ITP|RFP: package_name -- package_description
Regards.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Hi,
This ITP already exists (#697236) and is owned by Oleg Gashev
.
I'm merging these two bugs and setting Oleg Gashev as the
owner.
Please, contact Oleg Gashev to see if he's still working on
this package
or if he wants to comaintain this package with you.
Regards.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hi,
El dg 26 de 05 de 2013 a les 07:40 +0200, en/na Erik Josefsson va
escriure:
> Hello,
>
> I just saw that the suggested change in the title from "the
> BEREC-button" to "the berek button".
>
> Please change it back to BEREC.
Sorry for changing the title with a wrong name. Debian package name
retitle 709328 RFP: berek -- the berek button, reporting breach of the EU
cookie law to your national regulatory authority
thanks
El dg 26 de 05 de 2013 a les 11:36 +0200, en/na Erik Josefsson va
escriure:
> On 05/26/2013 11:04 AM, Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote:
> > Hi,
>
&g
Package: fop
Version: 1:1.1.dfsg-2
Severity: normal
Dear maintainer,
xmlstarlet can't be built on mips because fop fails:
Making portrait pages on USletter paper (8.5inx11in)
FOPdoc/xmlstarlet-ug.pdf
[warning] /usr/bin/fop: Unable to locate servlet-api in /usr/share/java
Exception
java.lan
found 709950 1:1.0.dfsg2-6
thanks
El dl 27 de 05 de 2013 a les 13:37 +0200, en/na Mathieu Malaterre va
escriure:
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 1:51 AM, Mònica Ramírez wrote:
> >> $ fop -xml xmlstarlet-man.xml -xsl xmlstar-fodoc-style.xsl
ònica
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -D -us -uc
dpkg-buildpackage: warning: using a gain-root-command while being root
dpkg-buildpackage: source package xmlstarlet
dpkg-buildpackage: source version 1.4.2-2
dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by Mònica Ramírez Arceda
dpkg-source --before-build xmlstarl
El dv 03 de 06 de 2011 a les 12:06 +, en/na Thorsten Glaser va
escriure:
> Mnica Ramrez Arceda dixit:
>
> >> SID $ xmlstarlet val -e -d
> >> /usr/share/xml/xhtml/schema/dtd/1.0/xhtml1-strict.dtd xvalid.htm
> >> xvalid.htm:7: Entity 'nbsp' not defined
> >> xvalid.htm - valid
> >
> >I created a
Hi,
If you want to adopt a package, you should intend to adopt it retitling
this bug (http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/#l3).
When you have finished your adoption (renaming the mantainer, fixing the
package if it's needed, etc), you can upload your new package at
http://mentors.debian.net and ask
tags 555069 patch
thanks
Description: Add X11 as a linked library. Closes #555069.
Author: Mònica Ramírez Arceda
Last-Update: 2011-06-09
Index: kvkbd-0.6/src/CMakeLists.txt
===
--- kvkbd-0.6.orig/src/CMakeLists.txt 2011-06-09 12:56
I attach a new improved patch.
Thanks for your work!
Mònica
Description: Add X11 as a linked library. Closes #555069.
Author: Mònica Ramírez Arceda
Last-Update: 2011-06-09
Index: kvkbd-0.6/src/CMakeLists.txt
===
--- kvkbd-0.6.orig
tags 615692 patch
thanks
Description: Add libargyll.la as a linked library where it is needed. Closes #615692.
Author: Mònica Ramírez Arceda
Last-Update: 2011-06-10
Index: argyll-1.1.1/target/Makefile.am
===
--- argyll-1.1.1.orig
tags 556696 patch
thanks
Description: Link to X11 and Xext. Closes #556696.
Author: Mònica Ramírez Arceda
Last-Update: 2011-06-11
Index: xenwatch-0.5.4/GNUmakefile
===
--- xenwatch-0.5.4.orig/GNUmakefile 2011-06-11 06:13
El dc 05 de 10 de 2011 a les 01:18 +0200, en/na Jakub Wilk va escriure:
> retitle 644244 please make data/watch/update-sf-list more robust
> thanks
>
> Thanks for the bug report.
>
> * Mònica Ramírez Arceda , 2011-10-04, 12:47:
> >$ uscan --report
> >uscan warn
El dt 30 de 08 de 2011 a les 01:08 +0200, en/na Mats Erik Andersson va
escriure:
> An identical matter is found in #343215 and #379011.
I tried to reproduce this bug again and it fails: it freezes and take up
many CPUs also,as A.Costa said. But it doesn't show the "xsol Symbol
`_XmStrings' has dif
Hi,
I can't reproduce this bug in bluefish version 2.0.3-1.
I think this bug has been solved with the new upstream
version and can be closed for 2.0.3-1 (testing/unstable) and higher.
Thanks for your work,
Mònica
--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-686-p
Source: erlang
Version: 1:14.b.3-dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2011-09-02 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> x86_64-linux-gnu-g
Source: geotranz
Version: 3.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2011-09-02 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> g++ -c -O2 -fPIC -pthread
Source: gmpc
Version: 0.20.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2011-09-02 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.
Source: gnat-4.4
Version: 4.4.6-5
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2011-09-02 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> ./gnatlink-static -o gna
Source: gridengine
Version: 6.2u5-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2011-09-02 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> gcc -DSGE_ARCH_STRING=
Source: gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg
Version: 0.10.11-4
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2011-09-02 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /bin/bash
Source: jed
Version: 1:0.99.19-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2011-09-02 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> gcc version 4.6.1 (Debian
Source: libbluray
Version: 1:0.0~git20110717.3477b65-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2011-09-02 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> gcc
Source: openscenegraph
Version: 3.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2011-09-02 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[3]: Entering
Source: pacemaker-mgmt
Version: 2.0.0+hg1141-2.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2011-09-02 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> Making al
Source: pyside-mobility
Version: 0.2.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2011-09-02 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/c++ -fP
Source: python-jpype
Version: 0.5.4.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2011-09-02 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> gcc -pthread -fno-
Source: redhat-cluster
Version: 3.0.12-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2011-09-02 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> gcc -g -O2 -Wall
Source: uwsgi
Version: 0.9.8.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2011-09-02 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> gcc -pthread -fPIC -share
El dg 04 de 09 de 2011 a les 16:18 +0200, en/na Ludovic Brenta va
escriure:
> Mònica Ramírez Arceda writes:
> >> /build/gnat-4.4-zZBW7n/gnat-4.4-4.4.6/build/gnattools/xref_lib.o: file not
> >> recognized: File truncated
>
> Filesystem full? Please look earlier in the
Sorry, the right link of the log is:
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2011/09/02/python-jpype_0.5.4.2-1_lsid64.buildlog
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Sorry, the right link of the log is:
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2011/09/02/redhat-cluster_3.0.12-2_lsid64.buildlog
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Sorry, the right link of the log is:
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2011/09/02/openscenegraph_3.0.0-2_lsid64.buildlog
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Sorry, the right link of the log is:
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2011/09/02/pacemaker-mgmt_2.0.0+hg1141-2.1_lsid64.buildlog
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Sorry, the right link of the log is:
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2011/09/02/pyside-mobility_0.2.2-1_lsid64.buildlog
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Sorry, the right link of the log is:
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2011/09/02/gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg_0.10.11-4_lsid64.buildlog
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Sorry, the right link of the log is:
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2011/09/02/jed_1:0.99.19-2_lsid64.buildlog
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Sorry, the right link of the log is:
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2011/09/02/libbluray_1:0.0~git20110717.3477b65-3_lsid64.buildlog
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Sorry, the right link of the log is:
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2011/09/02/gridengine_6.2u5-3_lsid64.buildlog
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Sorry, the right link of the log is:
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2011/09/02/gmpc_0.20.0-2_lsid64.buildlog
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Sorry, the right link of the log is:
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2011/09/02/uwsgi_0.9.8.3-1_lsid64.buildlog
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Sorry, the right link of the log is:
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2011/09/02/erlang_1:14.b.3-dfsg-2_lsid64.buildlog
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Sorry, the right link of the log is:
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2011/09/02/geotranz_3.1-2_lsid64.buildlog
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Sorry, the right link of the log is:
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2011/09/02/geotranz_3.1-2_lsid64.buildlog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Source: librpcsecgss
Version: 0.19-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110902 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/ld:
> /usr/li
1 - 100 of 592 matches
Mail list logo
