Bug#581857: "order random_1" brokeness

2010-05-16 Thread LaMont Jones
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 07:19:23PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > "order random_1" is applied to DO queries and consequently returns > data which fails DNSSEC validation. It's also not restricted to types > A and , so there's a risk of service degradation/DoS (for example, > assume that a down

Bug#574490: postfix: out of debootstrap: mail_queue_enter: create file maildrop/390620.22755: Permission denied

2010-03-18 Thread LaMont Jones
tag 574490 + moreinfo -- What exactly are you reporting, and what were you doing to get there? On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 03:57:56PM +0100, julien wrote: > Package: postfix > Version: 2.5.5-1.1 > Severity: important > > > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: 5.0.4 > APT prefers stable >

Bug#513113: (kein Betreff)

2009-01-26 Thread LaMont Jones
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 07:26:05PM +0100, Stefan Kania wrote: > Is it so difficult to build bind9 with LDAP support? Actually, it is built with dlz-ldap turned on. lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact li

Bug#246680: Status?

2009-01-27 Thread LaMont Jones
tags 246680 + wontfix -- On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 07:50:22PM +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > Hi Turbo, hi bind9 maintainers, > I was just wondering what the status of this bug/patch was. Could it be > updated > to latest bind9, or is it entirely superseeded by DLZ? IDN support? when upstream

Bug#461464: RC bugs reported against your package "bind9"

2009-01-26 Thread LaMont Jones
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:33:46AM +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: > While browsing through the list of release critical bugs searching for > something I could do for Lenny, I noticed that your package bind9 has a > release critical bug open for more or less a year. And serious for nearly

Bug#493095: no solution for diskless workstations

2009-02-11 Thread LaMont Jones
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:07:04AM -0500, Ken Chase wrote: > Cant deactivate NFS on a diskless box. So install the new nfs-utils first... That's all that's required... > Reality however is that diskless workstations are less than entirely uncommon, > and a proper solution would be nice. (I mean,

Bug#515110: bind9: FTBFS on i386 with 64-bit kernel

2009-03-18 Thread LaMont Jones
tag 515110 + wontfix severity 515110 wishlist -- It is perfectly reasonable to ask the kernel what we are, and build accordingly. Given the valid solution of using linux32, I don't see that this is even a bug. Leaving it open anyway, but won't be fixing it. lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t

Bug#515110: bind9: FTBFS on i386 with 64-bit kernel

2009-03-18 Thread LaMont Jones
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 05:50:22PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: > The kernel information is unreliable, it is better to use > dpkg-architecture and pass its output to 'configure'. Here is a patch > that fixes the FTBFS and should also enable cross-compilation: Except for any part of the build that

Bug#521271: Wrong library dependencies for nslookup

2009-03-26 Thread LaMont Jones
tags 521271 + moreinfo unreproducible -- What version of the various packages do you have? Installing dnsutils in a virgin sid chroot on amd64 gives me a working nslookup, with the correct libraries all present, and I don't see anywhere that the dependencies for dnsutils are incorrect. lamont

Bug#470915: postfix ignoring smtpd_recipient_restrictions

2008-03-15 Thread LaMont Jones
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 07:29:30AM +1000, Nathan Frankish wrote: > Dont hold me to this, but arent the options meant to be comma separated? In > the other lines that youve put each directive on a new line theres still a > comma at the end.. Its just a guess though. The delimiter for options is w

Bug#566072: util-linux: fsck goes into maintenance shell on every boot

2010-11-11 Thread LaMont Jones
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 06:58:21PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: > Clint Adams wrote: > >Is there a legitimate reason to set a pass number if you actually do not want > >the filesystem to be checked? > I would say probably not. But in the past, I (and others) would > often cut-and-paste fstab lines,

Bug#510130: Error calculing volhdr partition boundaries on SGI disklabel

2010-12-21 Thread LaMont Jones
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:05:06PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:43:45PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 03:42:11PM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote: > > That should be fine, thanks! > What's the status? fix-committed,

Bug#599081: watch file for bind9

2010-10-04 Thread LaMont Jones
tag 599081 + wontfix -- On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 10:56:21PM +0900, Masatake YAMATO wrote: > It seems that bind9 package doesn't have watch file. > I've written it, so please include this if appreciated. That is correct. Can't stand the things myself. lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian

Bug#600548: Tab completion for mount has extra escape characters when spaces are present

2010-10-18 Thread LaMont Jones
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 11:25:13PM -0700, Aaron Barany wrote: > After a little more experimentation, it appears that it only adds extra > escape characters if mount (and unmount) are preceded by sudo. The only > reason why umount worked for my test in my original message is because I > didn't speci

Bug#609415: Critical issue with mount not working at boot (with last new mount version!)

2011-01-09 Thread LaMont Jones
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 11:57:52AM +0100, yellow wrote: > then the client NFS has into /etc/fstab > mount the NFS > IP:/home /home nfs with here regullar parameters What specifically does the line say (ignoring the IP address). "regular parameters" has many posible meanings lamont -- To UN

Bug#598912: bind9: bind 9.6-ESV-R2 available; fixes DNSSEC issues

2010-10-07 Thread LaMont Jones
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 10:04:26PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Julien BLACHE: > > Bind9 9.6-ESV-R2 is available, with fixes for DNSSEC that can be > > considered security patches [1]. > I would like to push that out to stable, either via security or > proposed-updates. Lamont, what do you thi

Bug#214741: postfix: myhostname (if not set explicitly) is assigned the hostname with localdomain by default

2010-10-11 Thread LaMont Jones
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 06:03:16PM +0200, Hristo Erinin wrote: > Oct 6 12:27:27 fury postfix/postqueue[19564]: dict_eval: expand > $myhostname -> fury.localdomain What is the output from these commands? hostname --fqdn grep ^127 /etc/hosts lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bu

Bug#556404: Avahi has a problem with bind9 db.local-file and the localzone in named.conf

2009-11-16 Thread LaMont Jones
reasign 556404 avahi-daemon -- avahi needs to actually parse the zone info, not rely on filenames, as wildly vary. lamont On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 08:47:59PM +0100, Erik Grootjans wrote: > Package: Bind9 > Version: 1:9.5.1.dfsg.P3-1 > > I have made a default installation of bind and are using it

Bug#554585: nbtk_1.2.0-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: segv

2009-11-24 Thread LaMont Jones
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:35:58AM +0800, Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote: > tags 554585 + help Most likely, it's related to these errors, or something similar: ../nbtk/nbtk-widget.c: In function 'nbtk_widget_get_pseudo_classes': ../nbtk/nbtk-widget.c:853: warning: return from incompatible pointer

Bug#561251: mount: "Bluebirds" shows as /media/dvd when no disk is in reader!

2009-12-26 Thread LaMont Jones
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 09:21:33AM -0500, Gary Dale wrote: > Weird! When I remove a disk from my dvd rewriter, I get a phantom volume > labelled Bluebirds in /media/dvd. I can even open at least one of the > file - autorun.inf - and read it. There are also 3 .exe files > (bluebirds.exe, drag&burn.e

Bug#620710: util-linux: New upstream release available

2011-05-11 Thread LaMont Jones
2.19.1 was just uploaded to experimental so people can play with it before I actually upload it to sid. lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

<    1   2   3   4   5