Package: python3-django
Version: 1.8.7-1
If the django site lives somewhere that the admins have declared a bogus
top-level domain, and chosen to use an rfc1035-conforming name (with a hyphen
in the middle of it), then django URLField validation considers the domain to
be invalid. (I suspect th
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 09:43:16PM -0500, James Cloos wrote:
> shlib_directory=/usr/lib/postfix/lib
> daemon_directory=/usr/lib/postfix/daemons
I've been kicking this around with Scott K, and we're going to go with
shlib_directory=/usr/lib/postfix
daemon_directory=/usr/lib/postfix/
fixed 3.0.3-2
--
3.0.3-2 has the migration code to properly rewrite dynamicmaps.cf to reflect
upstream changes when incorporating shared libraries and dynamicmaps.
lamont
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 08:22:17PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> On 12.04.2012 18:51, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > [LaMont Jones]
> >* Link with and use sqlite when building dict_sqlite. add sqlite
> > dictionary to dynamicmaps.cf. Closes: #666950
>
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 09:27:51PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> This is presumably because my Postfix configuration has
> smtp_tls_CAfile = /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt
> but the init script seems to assume that the smtp_tls_CAfile will be a
> directory?
It looks to be a "almost corre
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 12:30:45PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> bind9 9.10.2 is available on https://www.isc.org/downloads/ - it would be nice
> if you could package this. (eg because latest freeipa versions need it.)
9.10.3-P4 is in NEW on its way to experimental. I'm expecting to land
it in si
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 02:35:16PM +0100, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
> I believe this is a serious bug, since it affects the most common way
> to deploy bind9 server which is in a chroot.
> In my opinion, we should probably not release stable stretch with
> bind9 in this state.
>
> This is wha
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 01:06:26PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Saturday, November 26, 2016 06:42:13 PM Bartosz Rudnicki wrote:
> > Yes, there is a tab character after pcre.
> >
> > I set "chroot" option to "n" for all services in the master.cf and
> > restarted postfix.
> >
> > Now, during
On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 06:09:35PM +0300, Sergey Alyoshin wrote:
> Package: postfix
> Version: 3.1.3-6
> Priority: wishlist
> Tags: l10n patch
This file is unchanged from one that landed in the source tree on the 9th..
Was that intentional?
lamont
On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 03:22:34PM +0100, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
> $ grep lmtp /etc/postfix/master.cf
> lmtp unix - - y - - lmtp
Is there by any chance any trailing whitespace on that line?
lamont
Package: ipmitool
Version: 1.8.16-3
# sudo ipmitool lan print
Set in Progress : Set Complete
Auth Type Support :
Auth Type Enable: Callback :
: User :
: Operator :
: Admin:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 10:28:07PM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Package: postfix
> Version: 3.0.3-1
> Severity: important
>
> Hey.
> Well there are already bugs open that postfix is broken since 3.0,...
> But another thing that apparently doesn't work:
> When doing something like
> sys
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:58:39PM +1000, Nikolai Lusan wrote:
> After upgrade to 3.1.0 the mail.log file fills with the following alert:
> Apr 11 23:42:23 lutsk postfix/master[8473]: warning: process
> /usr/libexec/postfix/smtpd pid 9583 exit status 127
> Apr 11 23:42:23 lutsk postfix/master[8473
retitle 820912 Bad command startup when daemon_directory is invalid
close 820912
--
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 05:09:47PM +1000, Nikolai Lusan wrote:
> # Fix problem caused by package maintainer.
> daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix
This would be your problem right here... Nothing in the packag
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 10:33:47AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> I suggest just not printing the last line if hwclock exits non-zero
> (because hwclock already prints sufficient info about the failure) with
> the following change in the /etc/init.d/hwclock.sh stop function.
> - /sbin/hwclock --syst
tag 437000 + moreinfo
--
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 10:35:52AM +0800, Wen-chien Jesse Sung wrote:
> After upgrading util-linux to 2.13~rc3-3 and bsdutils to 1:2.13~rc3-3,
> aptitude tells me something like 'got SIGSEGV @ 0' and quits.
> Downgrade these two packages to 2.13~rc3-1 and then aptitude wor
tags 437841 + moreinfo
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 04:23:46PM +0300, Anton Chernev wrote:
> The configuration file for Postfix SASL (smtpd.conf) is placed in the
> /etc/postfix/sasl/ directory. However, it is never read by the daemons.
> As a result, the authentication falls back to the default, usin
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 06:23:59PM +0300, Anton Chernev wrote:
> LaMont Jones wrote:
> I am also using x86.
> Indeed, I have recompiled Postfix to add a trash quota patch, by using
> the dpkg-build routine.
dpkg-buildpackage should result in the patches that you need...
strings
tags 420172 + moreinfo
--
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 04:20:36PM +0200, Patrik Wallstrom wrote:
> Package: postfix
> Version: 2.4.0-3
> Severity: normal
>
> These 2.4-versions keep crashing on me, that has never happened before.
> Nothing in the log files. No configuration changes from previous versi
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 09:16:54PM -0800, Jack Bates wrote:
> Recently, GSSAPI authentication to my Postfix server stopped working:
> Nov 21 19:56:39 tor postfix/smtpd[19940]: warning: SASL authentication
> failure:
> GSSAPI Error: An invalid name was supplied (Hostname cannot be canonicalized)
>
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 12:39:06PM +0300, Anton Chernev wrote:
> >$ strings -a /usr/lib/postfix/smtpd | grep "sasl:/usr/lib/sasl2"
> >/etc/postfix/sasl:/usr/lib/sasl2
> Does that mean it looks for the file in both places?
That is the path that postfix provides to sasl. It also tells me that
you'
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 01:11:49PM -0700, debtest wrote:
> I verified the differences in /proc/partitions. tsekine is correct.
> However, the 2.4.x distinction may be a bit vague as both of my machines are
> 2.4.x.
Can you see if the bug still exists with 2.13? I can't reproduce it
here.
lam
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 09:33:59AM +0200, Christian Lynbech wrote:
> The 'cfs' package stops working after upgrading to version 2.12r-9 of
> 'mount' and 'util-linux'.
Does this still happen with 2.13~rc3-5? (and nfs-common installed...)
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 08:51:34PM +0100, Martin Ketzer wrote:
> The specification of UUID=... in fstab does not wor for ntfs-partitions,
> neither does the mount -U ... - it claims "no such partition found" -
> but in /dev/disk/by-uuid/ these partitions are listed, along with ext3-,
> reiser- and
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 05:56:40PM +0200, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> The attached patch to /etc/init.d/postfix allows running and controlling more
> than one postfix instance. I am taking advantage of the postfix design, such
> ...
>
> Please feel free to apply this patch at the next release if you
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 01:26:21PM -0800, Fyodor wrote:
> In case this is useful for improving the Debian package (if
> necessary), here is the dependency string we use for the Nmap RPM
> distribution of Zenmap:
> Requires: python >= 2.4, nmap, pygtk2, python-sqlite2
yeah - definitely just a packa
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 09:42:05AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> However
> # mount /dev/sda /mnt
> works fine and the disk is mounted as vfat and all files are visible.
>
> Therefore something about fdisk etc. is behind the times.
Fdisk et al are utilities for managing partition tables, which
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 11:53:07AM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Just following up here to say that this fix worked for me on a system
> that only has postfix-doc installed:
> If 2.5 isn't going to get into unstable any time soon, a fix for the
> 2.4 series would probably be a useful thing.
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 08:16:12PM +, Marco Rodrigues wrote:
> Package: nmap
> Severity: wishlist
> Please update to the latest upstream version 4.50
> "Nmap celebrates its 10th anniversary with major version 4.50 release"
And thanks for waiting 20 minutes before filing the bug.
1) zenmap is
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 04:15:26PM +0300, Black Dew wrote:
> This also breaks debian policy "Packages must not depend on packages
> with lower priority values" as nfs-common is Priority: standard.
Which is to say that if mount truly requires nfs-common, then nfs-common
would be required, not stan
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 05:48:32PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> That's fairly fragile. IMO nfs-common should split off a separate nfs-mount
> binary package, on which util-linux will depend. (The priority of nfs-mount
> would need to be dumped to required, of course)
And that nfs-mount packa
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 12:41:35AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> You have NFS mounts, and this version of mount requires that nfs-common
> be upgraded before NFS mounts will work.
> Aborting install.
> dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/mount_2.13~rc2-4_i386.deb
> (--unpack):
> subproc
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 12:26:23PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 17:33:48 -0600, LaMont wrote in message
> > Could you send me a copy of /proc/mounts from that machine?
> nfsd /proc/fs/nfsd nfsd rw 0 0
Actually, that's the line that's causing it... I need to not match on
'nfsd
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 09:07:46AM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote:
> > nfsd /proc/fs/nfsd nfsd rw 0 0
> Actually, that's the line that's causing it... I need to not match on
> 'nfsd' type mounts...
Which I already don't do... Using the attached mount.preins
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 11:21:26PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > + NFS_IN_USE='localhost:/var/lib/cfs/.cfsfs /var/cfs nfs
> > rw,vers=2,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,hard,intr,proto=udp,timeo=11,retrans=2,sec=sys,addr=localhost
Note that you have an NFS mount... cfs is handling it.. :-(
> > ..patience d
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 10:35:07AM +0200, Falk Siemonsmeier wrote:
> When try to mount
> mount -o mountvers=2,nfsvers=3 netapp:/vol/vol_bc/bc_homes /media
> I get
> Segmentation fault
Could you load the latest nfs-common and mount from sid and see if that
resolves the problem?
thanks,
lamont
-
tags 435537 + moreinfo
--
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 08:25:48AM -0400, Christopher Browne wrote:
> Preparing to replace mount 2.12r-19 (using .../mount_2.13~rc2-5_amd64.deb) ...
> You have NFS mount points currently mounted, and this version of mount
> requires that nfs-common be upgraded before NFS
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 08:30:24PM +0200, Christoph Thomas wrote:
> for encrypted partititions the described bug seems to be
> reintroduced. Mount gives the message /dev/disk/by-label/... is not
> existing. Downgrading to 2.13~rc2-3 or 2.12r-19 solves the problem.
Sounds like libvolume-id doesn'
On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 02:43:04PM +0100, James Youngman wrote:
> Everything worked fine 'til I upgraded...
> So, whatever populates /dev/disk/by-label is not aware of (LVM2 & MD),
> and since mount no longer itself supports LABEL= directly, mount fails
> to mopunt perfectly good filesystems. Thi
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 12:02:24PM -0400, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> This patch to the Debian control and rules files provides what is
> required to support DLZ for the bind9 package.
I am not going to make every bind9 install force postgres to be
installed.
This needs to be split out as a separate
tags 435634 + etch
--
Forwarding to the bts.
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 10:18:47AM +0200, Falk Siemonsmeier wrote:
> Am Do 02.08.2007 16:28 schrieb LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Could you load the latest nfs-common and mount from sid and see if
> > that
> > res
reassign 435983 mdadm
--
done
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 03:44:32PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 04, James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > LABEL=foo entries can no longer be mounted;
> I love generalizations...
>
> > So, whatever populates /dev/disk/by-label is not aware of (LVM2
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 06:18:56PM +0100, Phil Endecott wrote:
> I'm also curious to know why reading the clock takes a second anyway.
> Note that we have to use --directisa on this hardware to avoid a random
> lock-up. It looks as if the CPU is busy for the second that it's
> running - in
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 11:11:36PM +0200, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> Package: mount
> Version: 2.13.1.1-1
> Severity: important
> Unlike what is said in mount(1), mount now mounts VFAT filesystems
> with iocharset=utf8. This is *very bad*, as it is not supported by the
> kernel:
The only occuran
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 08:48:19PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> can't this be fixed with a versioned pre-depends on nfs-utils?
Unacceptable to the security crowd, as this would result in every lenny
machine on the planet having portmapper installed and running...
What we really need is a version
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 02:48:35PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> I activated the query log in order to use "bindgraph" (which parses
> aforementioned log). Today, bindgraph just stopped graphing. Looking at
> the log showed me that it reached a maximum size of 2GB and logging
> would just stop:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:17:43AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> bind9 in lenny has several problems with ACL parsing. Emmanuel Bouthenot
> investigated those, and contacted upstream, who provided a patch that
> backports several fixes from the new upstream release (not yet
> released).
I'll be u
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:43:08PM +0100, Giovanni Rapagnani wrote:
> Dear Jones,
LaMont, actually...
> we are trying to get the release-notes ready for the lenny release. Do
> you think, as mount package maintainer, that the bug #501687 need to be
> documented.
> If so, do you have any advice
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 05:24:21PM +, Jonathan Patrick Davies wrote:
> A package which has a fixed nmap is awaiting upload at mentors.debian.net. It
> may be found here:
> *
> http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=nmap
I don't suppose you'd be willing to j
On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 07:16:12PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Will you upload a fixed package soon? Do you want someone to NMU or do
> you think the fix is not ready?
I'm still not sure if the patch is just masking an issue, or if it's a
proper fix.
And no, a random NMU is not the right answer for
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 05:37:54PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I uploaded the following changes to delayed/3.
>
> Lamont, if you do not like these changes, please upload alternate fixes,
> but do not block them.
>
Any chance you have the diff in a sane (separate commit per change)
diff, or jus
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 05:47:42PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> BIND 9.5.1rc1 is now available (since today):
> http://oldwww.isc.org/sw/bind/view/?release=9.5.1rc1
Yeah, I have the patch for just that bug backported, will be uploading
this week sometime.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 09:33:26PM -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> I just did an upgrade on my laptop running Sid and found that I could
> no longer mount a remote NFS share on my desktop. The NFS server is
> running Sid as well with the nfs-user-server 2.2beta47-22 package.
> Research showed that
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 09:19:05AM +0200, Fabien Brachere wrote:
> Postfix cannot be installed if you don't have access to exim4-doc-info
> package (somewhere in /var/lib/apt/files/* ).
> It's not important if you have a complete mirror of sarge, but if you
> work with a subset without exim4-doc-in
reassign 370071 netkit-inetd
--
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 07:08:28AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> How can I stop the actions causing these messages to syslog?
> inetd[3525]: daytime/tcp: bind: Permission denied
> inetd[3525]: discard/udp: bind: Permission denied
> inetd[3525]: discard/tcp: bind: Perm
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 10:45:41AM +0200, Fabien wrote:
> Le vendredi 02 juin 2006 à 16:34 -0600, LaMont Jones a écrit :
> > On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 09:19:05AM +0200, Fabien Brachere wrote:
> > > Postfix cannot be installed if you don't have access to exim4-doc-info
>
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 10:09:36AM +0200, Joerg Morbitzer wrote:
> mars:~ mount -t nfs erde:/opt/sol3s /opt/sol3s
> mount: erde:/opt/sol3s: can't read superblock
> mars:~
>
> After downgrading back to 2.12r-8 it works again like expected. No syslog
> messages concerning this problem on neither the
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 11:12:07AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I stumbled across exact same problem today (although using cowbuilder
> around pbuild :-) ), and wonder: if tagging as wontfix, isn't it then
> an error to also close this bug?
Not an error - it's not even a bug, so there's nothin
for gcc-4.1. (Patch by LaMont Jones from the ubuntu package)
> lamont: can debian drop this now that we're using gcc 4.1?
I expect so. The good part is that it fails to build if we still need
it, rather than just building bad debs.
I'll test it out sometime soonish
lamont
--
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 02:34:44AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> After pinging Lamont on IRC, I decided to try the fix myself...
> glib2.0 with debian/patches/999_ia64_atomic_ops_broken.patch removed built
> fine on merulo (sid chroot).
> ii gcc 4.1.1-3 The GNU C compiler
> Is
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 08:25:33AM +0200, Martin Waitz wrote:
> Package: mount
> Version: 2.12r-9
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
>
> It seems the new NFS4 patch is not entirely fixed as CFS does not work
> with the new mount version. Going back to 2.12r-8 makes CF
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 07:54:50PM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
> Please excuse my error in previous post. It turned out that
> 'myhostname' does not support similar file reference as myorigin
> Anyway, please suggest in dpkg-reconfigure (and at install) that
> the value of myhostname is the same as r
Package: dhcp3-client
Version: 3.1.1-6
/sbin/dhclient-script generates a resolv.conf file with both domain and
search directives. Since only the latter one of these actually means
anything (overwritting any previous ones...), this only does two things:
1) helps pre-1987 programs that don't know t
Package: texlive-base
Severity: critical
Version: 2007.dfsg.2-4
While building matplotlib on hppa, the following error occurred:
(see
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=matplotlib&ver=0.98.5.3-1&arch=hppa&stamp=1243891746&file=log
)
=
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 06:06:09PM +1000, Trent W. Buck wrote:
> The most obvious way, I suppose, would be for mount to skip the test
> if nfs-common is not installed. If nfs-common isn't installed, then
> presumably any NFS entries it "sees" in /etc/mtab or /proc/mounts are
> either stale or not
tag 526850 unreproducible
--
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 02:14:14AM +0300, Sergiy Yegorov wrote:
> Package: mount
> Version: 2.14~rc2-0
> Severity: important
> How to reproduce:
> excelsior % losetup /dev/loop0 SLED-11-DVD-x86_64-GM-DVD.iso
Doesn't reproduce here - does syslog have anything interesti
tags 534851 + moreinfo
--
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 06:25:12PM +0200, Petr Gajdůšek wrote:
> Package: bind9-host
> Version: 1:9.6.1.dfsg-2
> Severity: important
>
> petr:~$ host -T rsync.sanesecurity.net
> socket.c:2486: REQUIREsock) != ((void *)0)) && (((const isc__magic_t
> *)(sock))->magic =
tags 516934 + wontfix
severity 516934 wishlist
--
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 04:27:08PM +0100, Peter Allgeyer wrote:
> Support for the "fixed" rrset-order option can be enabled or
> disabled by specifying "--enable-fixed-rrset" or "--disable-fixed-rrset"
> on the configure command line. The default i
Package: gettext
Version: 0.16.1-1
Severity: serious
/usr/bin/autopoint contains the following excuse for requiring cvs:
# The requirement that the user must have the CVS program available is not
# a severe restrictions, because most of the people who use autopoint are
# users of CVS.
#
# Check a
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 01:40:01PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > Can you please at least move cvs to Recommends of gettext and
> > mention autopoint and it's cvs dependency in the description of
> > gettext before closing this bug?
> Can the submitter please tell me what problem, exactly, are we
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 07:24:31PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> Package: util-linux
> Version: 2.12p-7
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
>
> Here's the debian-specific part of the changes needed to fix FTBFS on
> GNU/kFreeBSD. The upstream part is being sent by Guillem Jover directly to
> upst
severity 328777 wishlist
tags 328777 + wontfix
--
This isn't really functionality that belongs in getty.
lamont
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 01:55:41PM +0200, Gürkan Sengün wrote:
> Package: util-linux
> Version: 2.12p
>
> I've created a little patch to allow a loginname like
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1
>
On Sat, May 08, 2004 at 02:04:25PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> When running "man renice", it starts off with "RENICE(8)"; however,
> according to apropos and ls, renice is /usr/share/man/man1/renice.1.gz
Fixed in 2.13
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 09:00:28PM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
> Contrary to its being marked "Fixed" this error still appears on my system
> every time I apt-get upgrade. Here's a cut-and-paste:
Interesting... It would appear that you didn't upgrade
/etc/postfix/postfix-script at some point in the p
tags 443089 + moreinfo
--
dpkg --fsys-tarfile postfix_2.3.8-2+b1_i386.deb | tar tvf - | grep
postfix-script
-rwxr-xr-x root/root 6840 2007-03-21 05:17 ./etc/postfix/postfix-script
I'm at a loss to understand how this file _isn't_ on your system.
Any ideas?
lamont
I expect that reintalling
w
+
+ * Non-Maintainer Upload
+ * Fix implicit definitions throughout. Closes: #441115
+
+ -- LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:38:18 -0600
+
expect (5.43.0-13) unstable; urgency=low
* Applied patch from Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to
diff -urN t/expect-5.43.0/
/debian/changelog 2007-09-20 19:05:17.0 -0600
+++ expect-tcl8.3-5.43.0/debian/changelog 2007-09-20 19:04:22.0 -0600
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+expect-tcl8.3 (5.43.0-5.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Merge in changes from expect 5.43.0-13.1
+
+ -- LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu, 20 Se
On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 05:01:14PM +0200, giggz wrote:
> I think I must report this bug to the package initscripts but I'm not sure...
What exactly are you seeing? That is, when you say 'but For these 3
mount : ... I get the localtime + 2 hours...'? Where are you seeing
that time?
The reason is
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 09:50:24AM +0200, Giggz wrote:
> Ok. But I am a little afraid that the /proc and /sys which 'talk' with
> the kernel are not at the right time...
The kernel only has one time... The modification time on the /proc and
/sys filesystems is never looked at by anything other t
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 06:45:36PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> Package: bind9
> Version: 1:9.4.1-P1-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Might be minor; I'm not sure what the significance is.
>
> Since this morning my logs show frequent entries like
> Sep 2 17:03:24 corn named[3794]: *** POKED TIMER ***
>
tags 446023 + wontfix
--
arch is depricated. use 'uname -m', which does the same thing only
better.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 01:48:43PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Hence, I believe the correct answer is to restore hwclockfirst.sh, and
> to make it be at run at /etc/rcS.d/S08hwclockfirst.sh.
Feel up to testing my fix? Otherwise, I'll find a machine and get it
tested.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRI
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 05:43:01AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Package: mount
> Version: 2.12r-10
> Severity: minor
>
> By accident I typed
> # umount /; echo $?
> and was surprised that no message or error status was printed.
I can't reproduce that with 2.13-6... does it still do it for you, or
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 02:33:04PM +0200, Paul van der Holst wrote:
> When i want to upgrade to the new unstable version 2.13-7 i am getting the
> problem below.
> Also i am getting in perl (perl -MCPAN -e shell) alot of the same problems.
> This started when upgrading to the new version... Please
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 03:20:53PM +0200, Alain Guibert wrote:
> On Saturday, September 22, 2007 at 9:21:17 -0600, LaMont Jones wrote:
> -1) The README.Debian.hwclock ".gz" extension lacks in comments (the
> return of the revenge of the recently closed bug #393539).
-
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 06:38:03PM +0200, Jindřich Vrba wrote:
> I have the same problem. I found out, that this problem appeared when
> the gateway server restarts, so probably because forwarders are not
> available.
I would expect something in syslog, or at least a core file in
/var/cache/bind.
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 02:32:41PM +0100, Jochen Voss wrote:
> While the issue does not look particularly exploitable to me (getting
> control over somebody else's setterm command line arguments does not
> seem easy), I think it would be good to fix this anyway.
Given that setterm does not run wit
reassign 308633 linux-2.6
--
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 11:34:34AM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote:
> dmesg -n 0 is a valid level according to linux/kernel.h as well as man
> klogctl (3), however when it is executed, the following error is
> printed:
> klogctl: Invalid argument
dmesg just passes this th
Version: 2.4.5-1
Fixed a while back.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 10:24:16AM -0300, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho wrote:
> Bind9 can't create secondary zone files into /etc/bind (slave mode). The
> /var/log/syslog shows:
> A solution to correct it is change /etc/bind directory owner from "root"
> to "bind" user. Please, consider this change or
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 12:51:55AM +0200, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> Any news on fixing this? I can supply a patch
> for 9.4.1 if needed...
A patch for the bind9 source that delivers an additional binary that
diverts /usr/sbin/named or such would be a welcome start.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 09:00:27AM -0700, David Liontooth wrote:
> hfs: write access to a jounaled filesystem is not supported, use the
> force option at your own risk, mounting read-only.
>
> Should be "journaled" not "jounaled".
I don't find this text anywhere in the source (your version or cu
On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 10:20:47AM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> | ./sys_defs.h:749:25: error: operator '<' has no left operand
I'd be interested to see the cpp output, as I've been unable to
reproduce this.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 08:04:23AM +0200, Mader, Alexander (N-MSR) wrote:
> Something additional: I am running a Debian kernel not a self built one,
> and /lib/udev/rules.d/85-hwclock.rules was not there in the first place
> so I had to create it.
That file is delivered by util-linux what
tags 524574 + unreproducible
severity 524574 normal
--
Nothing in the postfix config would cause us to chgrp
/var/spool/postfix/etc to the sasl group, nor would we chmod 710 that
directory. I rather suspect this is a bug in another package.
lamont
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 10:39:25AM +0200, Mi
tags 516616 + help moreinfo
forcemerge 516616 520688
--
This will need someone in the mips / mipsel porting world to provide a
patch for bind9 to fix it.
lamont
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 06:02:51PM +0100, Rainer Canavan wrote:
> This problem has also been reported on the mips architecture
> and ap
tags 358336 + wontfix
--
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 10:49:04AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> Upstream has decided not to include the manpages in the sources so that
> packages don't have to bear the burden of working with XML (or generating
> proper code automatically). However, not
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 07:52:15AM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> In any case as you state that ndiff has changed a lot in the recent
> years I think we should remove the ndiff package anyway as it would not
> work. Unmaintained software is not good to keep in the archive unless
> some Debian develo
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 09:11:34PM +0400, Vladimir Stavrinov wrote:
> Once more feature: there are no problems at boot time if /usr reside on root
> fs.
I'm given to understand that /etc/localtime was changed a while ago to
be a real file, rather than a symlink to /usr... I expect that this is
n
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 02:54:31PM +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
> No response from the maintainers, no action, raising the priority.
> that is happening again and again, although it never happened in all
> the many years I am using Debian before. Now it
> is getting a pain, esp when you are wat
201 - 300 of 421 matches
Mail list logo
