On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 11:07:45AM +, Magnus Therning wrote:
> On 2/14/07, LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 02:23:43PM +, Magnus Therning wrote:
> There is also no complaint about the service already being started:
> # /etc/init.d/pos
severity 411071 serious
close 411071
merge 411071 410781
--
This was exposed by update-inetd changing, and is fixed in 2.3.7-3
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 07:41:53PM +0100, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> Quoting Matthew King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Apparently the patch has already been done but if the current
> A COUPLE of times :)
> But the maintainers don't want to risk being both upstream
> and Debian GNU/Linux packagers for t
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 09:24:16AM -0700, Andrew Robinson wrote:
> This bug represents a significant Linux policy violation. Generated
> files should never be created in the /etc directory. As a workaround I
> linked all of my zone files into /var/cache/bind, and then used those
> in my named.conf.
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 12:15:33AM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > ../../lib/libdns.a: undefined reference to `_info'
Well, that's a different error than I've seen on the mipsel buildd for
unstable... Which I also haven't been able to reproduce
Can you capture the failed build tree for
reassign 413515 module-init-tools
--
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 04:19:59PM +0100, Olaf Zaplinski wrote:
> My intention: deactivating the auto-load ov ipv6.ko (kernel 2.6). I tried:
2.6 kernel -> not modutils.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 09:47:03AM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> If postfix/root_address is empty, I get a broken aliases file. The
> patch below fixes it.
Actually, no it doesn't.
> -if [ "$ret" != "none" ] || [ -z "$ret"] ; then
> +if [ "$ret" != "none" ] || [ ! -z "$ret"] ; then
+
forcemerge 415670 415727
--
> After upgrading postfix in Debian etch from 2.3.7 to 2.3.8, postfix does not
> allow any connections to port 25 any more, it simply does not
> respond. The /var/log/mail.log (and mail.warn and mail.info) are filled with
> lines like:
See #415670.
lamont
--
To U
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: 4g8
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Darren Bounds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://forgate.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
Description : capture
close 411749
merge 411749 410871
tags 411749 + etch
--
> Postfix postinst fails when inetd does not have any services enabled. (At
> least) in this case, the call to update-inetd on line 177 dumps some output
And fixed in 2.3.7-3
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a sub
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 08:26:18PM +0200, Arek Dykiel wrote:
> Package: bind9
> Version: 1:9.3.2-2
> Severity: important
> After upgrading bind to the latest unstable it was working for several hours
> then died with:
>
> Aug 20 00:18:51 socrates named[1241]: rdata.c:287: REQUIRE(!((void
> *)((
severity 411872
merge 411872 410871
--
And fixed in 2.3.7-3
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: util-linux
Version: 2.12r-17
Severity: serious
If built with sudo, util-linux doesn't deliver the mount deb. This is
bad.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 412468 + unreproducible moreinfo
--
Works here for me (9.3.4-2 on x86)
lamont
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 10:22:53AM +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> The new upgrade brings a version who is not anymore able to serve WKS
> records.
> I had the following in my zone:
> IN WKS 192.168.17
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 12:07:57PM +0100, Petr Salinger wrote:
> It incorporates needed changes into debian/patches/30hurd.dpatch
> and changes debian/rules to ignore failure of "make tidy".
> On GNU/kFreeBSD and GNU/hurd it fails always when the 30hurd.dpatch
> is not applied - i.e. also in the in
tags 406348 + wontfix
--
The correct way to do this is to use a proxy map, rather than copying
more data into the chroot.
$mumble_maps = proxy:ldap:... will solve the problem, and keep private
information out of the chroot.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
forwarded 418511 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 08:54:05AM +, Debian BTS wrote:
> Package: postfix
> Version: 2.3.8-2+b1
> Severity: minor
>
> main.cf documentation should state clearly that
> mynetworks_style = subnet
> relays open for ALL IP pool providers,
> not only for c
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 06:08:13PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> As it has already been deprecated in README.Debian and the upgrade path
> from bind to bind9 can hardly be done in an automated manner, it should
> be sufficient to simply have bind8 removed? Or should we add a note
> into the re
Package: ftp.debian.org
Please remove the 'bind' source package from lenny and sid - bind8 has
replaced it.
thanks,
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: bind8
Severity: serious
Version: 8.4.7-3
BIND 8 is old and crufty and should not be in Lenny.
thanks,
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: ftp.debian.org
Please remove the 'bind' package from sid, it has been replaced by 'bind8'.
And please remove 'bind8' from lenny: it should not ship. (RC bug is
now filed to keep it from promoting.)
thanks,
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 11:54:08AM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
> While updating my desktop to Etch, apt-get crashed with the following
> error:
Any clue what version fo postfix you were upgrading from? and it sounds
more like a bug with postfix-tls in sarge. sigh.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
tags 417530 + sid
--
This will be fixed in sid by causing preinst to warn you and require
your acceptance before letting you install postfix 2.4 on a kernel
without epoll support. Said warning being that it won't work.
And I'll update init.d with a more visible and clear error message.
lamont
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 06:54:43PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Bind 8 is obsolete and should not be included in Lenny, which would
> require to support it at least until 2011.
Absolute agreement here.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 07:33:34PM +0200, Patrik Wallstrom wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Sep 2006, Micah Anderson wrote:
> > Does this patch work with just plain ole 'bind' (not bind9)? That
> > package also seems vulnerable...
> No, there are separate packages för BIND 8. (All BIND users should
> upgrade to
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 02:46:37PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Petter Reinholdtsen]
> I just checked /sbin/hwclock, and based on the use of /dev/rtc, I
> believe it should start after mountdevsubfs. So the header should
> look like this:
Except that hwclockfirst exists _ENTIRELY_ to run
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 12:07:37PM +0200, Udo Mueller wrote:
> > Please send me a copy of /etc/postfix/postfix-script.
> Attached
Interestingly, that is not the version of postfix-script delivered by
the package... Any chance you are running an old copy of
postfix-script?
lamont
--
To UNSUBSC
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 09:53:38AM +0200, Joachim Løvgaard wrote:
> I apt-get upgraded and postfix got updated. After that I couldnt send
> mails through my smtp server. I checked everything were ok. Both that
> postfix didnt run as root, and that sendmail -bs neither did run as
> root. When I trie
On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 09:14:02PM +0100, Beat Bolli wrote:
> LaMont Jones wrote:
> >Does this still occur with 2.2.7-1? (or even 2.2.6-1)
> Yes, unless I put "disable_dns_lookups = yes" in my main.cf file. I'm
> still on 2.2.6-1.
Interesting... what do the follo
tags 382386 + patch
thanks
This adds support for HPPA linux machines.
lamont
diff -ur t/tightvnc-1.2.9/Xvnc/config/cf/linux.cf
tightvnc-1.2.9/Xvnc/config/cf/linux.cf
--- t/tightvnc-1.2.9/Xvnc/config/cf/linux.cf2006-08-10 22:50:08.0
+
+++ tightvnc-1.2.9/Xvnc/config/cf/linux.cf
Package: vpopmail-bin
Severity: serious
Version: 5.4.4-1
vpopmail-bin Depends: libmysqlclient10, which is no longer in the
archive, making the package uninstallable.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 04:00:29PM +0200, Udo Mueller wrote:
> Patch attached but does not suppress any messages.
Please send me a copy of /etc/postfix/postfix-script.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reopen 287812
--
> g++ -c -pipe -Iplatform -Ircxlib -Inqc -Icompiler -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
> -Wmissing-prototypes -I/usr/local/include/LegoUSB -Wno-deprecated
> -DDEFAULT_SERIAL_NAME='"/dev/rcx"' nqc/nqc.cpp -o nqc/nqc.o
> cc1plus: warning: command line option "-Wstrict-prototypes" is valid
Package: libsvn-dev
Severity: serious
Version: 1.4.0-5
In the build attempt of medsua found at
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=medusa&ver=1.2-1%2Bb1&arch=i386&stamp=1161300496&file=log
the following errors show up:
> i486-linux-gnu-gcc -Wall -g -O2 -g -DDEBUG -fPIC -I/usr/local/include
title 394784 nmap website no longer accepts fingerprints from stable NMAP
severity 394784 normal
forward 394784 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Fyodor - any hints on when a compatible version of nmap will be
official?
thanks,
lamont
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 01:22:21AM -0300, Alexandre Pereira Nunes wrote:
>
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 10:23:59AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> I am unable to find any newer version in /usr/share/misc/. We use
> config.guess dated 2006-07-02 and config.sub dated 2006-09-20. What
> version do we have to use to get the source built on hppa?
Something from 2004 or so...
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 12:07:42PM -0400, Brian Nelson wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > How about using the system inotify syscall numbers and such instead of
> > private ones???
> Ehhh, I don't know why they do that. Maybe so that they can verify that
> those arches work first? Who knows..
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 09:48:54AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This problem seem to have solved itself, as the hppa binary is
> uploaded and the latest build log claim it built just fine. Closing
> it as fixed.
Thanks - I was unable to reproduce it, and a simple give-back let the
a
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 08:48:20PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>* Improve the description (Closes: #392130)
> * Fix FTBFS - only build on supported architectures (Closes: #394892)
Note that you haven't fixed the FTBFS, just made it explicit - there is
no reason that the packag
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 10:18:30PM +0200, Marcus Better wrote:
> I had a working GSSAPI setup with Sendmail. Today I switched to Postfix, and
> hit this problem. I also have GSSAPI working with Cyrus IMAP.
Could you add a -v or 2 to the smtpd invocation, that will generate a
bunch more logging, w
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 04:39:31PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> How could that possibly work given that mountall.sh runs after hwclockfirst.sh
> and hwclock.sh, i.e. when /var is on a separate file system.
In fact, /etc/adjtime MUST live on the root filesystem, since it must be
accessed
before (
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 03:41:37PM +0100, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> Please consider the attached patch that displays a warning using debconf. Note
> that I've added the warning in the postinst script (as opposed to preinst, as
> suggested in msg #54 of this bug report) so that it suffices to Depe
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:33:27PM +0100, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 09:48:30AM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote [edited]:
> > I'll ponder this an get back with you on Monday (US time).
> and? what about my earlier proposal of using debconf only if it happens
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:38:41PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Lamont, are you fine with an NMU?
> This bug has been open for a long time and needs to be fixed for Squeeze
> soon.
I have another upload for util-linux that I'm planning doing late this week
or monday. (566072)
Is that soon
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 08:52:42PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 01:42:29PM +0100, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> I'd like to echo this; 9.9.x has useful and important functionality
> for DNSSEC deployment.
>
> The bug in question seems to be a repeat of #720813 which was m
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 04:37:15PM -0500, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> Setting relay_host in /etc/postfix/main.cf manual and the doing
> dpkg-reconfigured results in debconf setting (unless you set it back) the
> relay_host previously configured in debconf, not the one from main.cf through
> manual
On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 08:42:08PM +, Wookey wrote:
> Updated patch attached.
> As the Debian arm64 port is now properly underway and this was filed
> over a year ago, I propose to NMU this as otherwise it'll be an FTBFS soon.
Do it. I'm hoping that we'll have an upload before the month is ov
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:24:51AM +0100, Olaf Zaplinski wrote:
> Package: bind9
> Version: 1:9.8.4.dfsg.P1-6+nmu2+deb7u1
> Severity: normal
> Tags: ipv6
>
> Dear Maintainer,
> named silently fails at boot, perhaps because of these two IPv6 addresses
> that this host has:
> 2a00:12c0:1015:100:1::
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 07:39:03PM -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> Pardon my ignorance, but I note that Jessie and wheezy-backports
> haven't been fixed yet. Is it the practice to close the bug report
> before the package has propagated from sid?
The bug is marked as found in 2.11.0-1, and fixed
> +++ bind9-9.9.5.dfsg/debian/rules
> + install -m644 lib/isc/unix/errno2result.h debian/bind9/usr/include/isc
This feels wrong to me, and makes be believe that errno2result.h is not
intended to be delivered. Lets discuss this one a bit more, first.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi
tag 741285 + moreinfo
--
I'll need someone with kfreebsd to provide a patch.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tag 690361 + moreinfo
--
It is not clear what exactly the change should be here, nor do I have
a machine to test it on.
If someone would like to propose a patch, I'd be happy to include it.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubsc
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 03:11:42PM +0100, Peter Beck wrote:
> Having the same issue on a wheezy machine with Samba4.
> I'm also curious if this will be fixed for wheezy too.
The current plan is to have 1:9.8.4.dfsg.P1-3 migrate to wheezy.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-req
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 06:08:58PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> With the grown deployment of DNSSEC and more information being put into
> the domain name system, DNS servers have become and are becoming a
> useful tool for denial of service attacks by providing amplification:
> a single UDP pack
Package: cricket
Version: 1.0.5-11
Tags: patch
The sample config defines bgcolor=white, but does not define white, resulting
in cpu graphs not displaying.
lamont
--- /tmp/Defaults 2011-11-16 12:32:57.0 +
+++ sample-config/Defaults 2011-11-16 12:23:47.0 +
@@ -15
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 05:42:58PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 05:06:51AM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
> > fixed 697352 1:9.9.2.dfsg.P1-2
> > thanks
> I can't find this version. Has it been uploaded to unstable yet?
It'll be uploaded this week so
elog
index 13f278e..2ef9801 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+bind9 (1:9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze9) squeeze-proposed-updates; urgency=low
+
+ * Update db.root with new IP for D.root-servers.net. Closes: #697352
+
+ -- LaMont Jones Tue, 08 Jan 2013 07:07:02 -0700
+
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 03:10:55PM +0100, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
> a bind 9.9 package would be great as the new upstream version contains
> many improvements regarding DNSSEC. Is there any progress on this or
> does anyone have a working debian source for bind 9.9? It's not in the
> git reposit
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 05:22:10PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Indeed. In any case, were the new version to be accepted in to the
> release then the appropriate route would be via unstable, not direct
> to t-p-u.
Works for me. I'll toss 9.8.4 into sid. As for getting it into wheezy,
it'll ma
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 09:31:00AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Package: bind9
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
> Please see https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-00828
> Stable is not affected. This needs to be fixed through
> testing-proposed-updates,
> since
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 12:28:31AM +0200, Hilko Bengen wrote:
> I have just uploaded nmap 6.25-0.1 to DELAYED/5:
Please go ahead and upload it to non-delayed. I'll get the source tree
caught up with the archive in the next week or 3.
lamont
> nmap (6.25-0.1) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * Non-m
Package: iptables
Version: 1.4.18-1
Tags: patch
--
Since time immemorial, iptables has called setsockopt() and treated any
-1 return value as fatal. Any system call can return EAGAIN or
EINPROGRESS (depending on the origins of the API), and good coding
practice requires checking for that and retr
found 2.4.6-4
--
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 10:40:51PM +0100, Dominik George wrote:
> Package: postfix
> Version: 2.10.0-3
> Severity: normal
>
> The postinst script cannot successfully run update-rc.d when dnsmasq is
> installed but disabled at boot time.
This was introduced in the original insserv
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 01:50:22AM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> I have a modified /etc/default/bind9.
> Everytime bind packages are upgraded, I end up having a
> /etc/default/bind9.dpkg-dist, which by itself is fine, but dpkg never
> queries me with the usual dialog on whether I want to
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 08:44:55PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Debian admin has deployed the patch at [2] to the bind running the
> debian.org nameservers - else debian.org's nameservers would not have
> any resources left to answer legitimate queries.
>
> We think it important that the bind v
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:53:01AM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 07:37:03AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Given these, I am not convinced that this should be RC for wheezy.
> How about a NEWS item drawing attention to the issue and workaround,
> and a downgrade to
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 09:09:50AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> I've been looking into Postfix RC bug #700719. In short, my proposal is to
> fix the maintainer field and then unblock the package. Please see my message
> in the bug log for details.
wheezy has 2.9.3-2.1, sid has 2.10.0-1. Given
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 07:19:49PM +0100, Jean-Jacques Doti wrote:
> I've been able to solve the problem by adding this line to the conf
> (main.cf) :
> smtpd_relay_restrictions = permit_sasl_authenticated,
> permit_mynetworks, reject_unauth_destination
> but I'm not sure there will be no side
diff -u postfix-2.9.6/debian/control postfix-2.9.6/debian/control
--- postfix-2.9.6/debian/control
+++ postfix-2.9.6/debian/control
@@ -1,8 +1,7 @@
Source: postfix
Section: mail
Priority: extra
-Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers
-XSBC-Original-Maintainer: LaMont Jones
+Maintainer: LaMont Jones
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 05:59:32PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> A debdiff against the current wheezy package (possibly minus the .po
> changes and some of the repetitive documentation updates) would probably
> have been more useful, fwiw.
Noted for the future.
> > The source and amd64 binaries
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 08:24:18AM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> This source package contains the following files from the
> IETF under non-free license terms:
Nice boilierpate bug. I thought I had gotten all of these, I'll deal with
the rest shortly.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 01:58:42PM +0200, Maximilian Gass wrote:
> nmap 5.50 is out since January 28th. Please upgrade the package.
Yeah, it's in progress these 5 months now.
> Judging by the PTS, you are missing a debian/watch file ;)
It wouldn't have changed anything, other than getting me even
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 05:10:58PM +0200, Witold Baryluk wrote:
> What is the status of bringing BIND 9.8 to Debian?
> Status of this bugreport was changed to pending,
> but I donot see why.
It was changed to pending because the upload is pending. I'm expecting to
upload it sometime this week, on
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 07:21:39PM +0200, InuSasha wrote:
> i want to reopen the wish-entry.
> the bind 9.8.4 supports the ldap back-end out of the box.
>
> only "--with-dlz-ldap=yes" have to add to configure.
I believe that doing that forces ldap to be installed on every machine
that has bind9 i
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 03:26:59PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> the Knot DNS 1.3.0 introduced knot-dnsutils and knot-host package(s),
> so it would be nice if the two can coexist nicely in the system.
> knot-dnsutils and knot-host provide kdig, knsupdate and khost binaries
> that aim to be 1:1 compa
tag 708420 + moreinfo
--
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 06:57:04PM +0200, Vincent Rischmann wrote:
> I have multiple instances of postfix, each in /etc/postfix/ms/{01,02,...}
> Postfix is correctly configured (postmulti lists my instances as enabled).
What is "multi_instance_name" set to in the various i
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 09:47:14AM -0430, Ernesto Hernández-Novich wrote:
> * Package name: bind10
> Version : 1.1.0
> Upstream Author : ISC Software Distribution
> * URL : http://bind10.isc.org
> * License : BSD
> Programming Lang: C++, Python
> Description
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 11:13:29PM +0100, Norman Rasmussen wrote:
> Friendly ping?
Uploaded 1:9.8.1.dfsg-1 to sid yesterday.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 01:18:36AM -0700, Fyodor wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 03:43:27PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> >
> > We're 9 months later and we're still at 5.21 in Debian unstable.
> I don't want to get embroiled in any Debian politics, but I will say,
> on behalf of the Nmap Projec
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 02:38:26PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2012, LaMont Jones wrote:
> > Sounds great. Nmap hasn't been getting the attention it deserves from me.
> > I'll get some time to focus on this next week while I'm on a plane.
> F
Package: postfix
Version: 2.9.1-5
--
When the package is upgraded, dynamicmaps_upgrade is queried, but never
created, so we skip adding sqlite to the maps list.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm
Package: xserver-xorg-video-i128
Version: 1:1.3.5-1+b1
--
Fails to build with the following error:
config.status: executing libtool commands
dh_auto_build -a -O--builddirectory=build/
make[1]: Entering directory
`/build/buildd-xserver-xorg-video-i128_1.3.5-1+b1-ia64-h5rmfB/xserver-xorg-video-i
Package: xserver-xorg-video-qxl
Version: 0.0.17-2+b1
--
CCLD libuxa.la
make[4]: Leaving directory
`/build/buildd-xserver-xorg-video-qxl_0.0.17-2+b1-ia64-5fbY_J/xserver-xorg-video-qxl-0.0.17/build/src/uxa'
make[4]: Entering directory
`/build/buildd-xserver-xorg-video-qxl_0.0.17-2+b1-ia64-5fbY
Package: dolfin
Version: 1.0.0-5
--
cd
/build/buildd-dolfin_1.0.0-5-ia64-LDjTpK/dolfin-1.0.0/obj-ia64-linux-gnu/dolfin/swig
&& /usr/bin/g++ -D_cpp_EXPORTS -DBOOST_UBLAS_NDEBUG -DHAS_SLEPC -DHAS_PETSC
-DHAS_UMFPACK -DHAS_CHOLMOD -DHAS_SCOTCH -DHAS_ZLIB -DHAS_MPI
-DMPICH_IGNORE_CXX_SEEK -DHAS_
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 12:48:44AM +0100, Pascal Volk wrote:
> No idea why the Postfix package creates /etc/aliases if the file doesn't
> exist. The postinst script probably should check `postconf -h alias_database`
> output. And it will hopefully do nothing if the output looks like
> `${indexed}al
tags 626648 + wontfix
--
It also lacks RELEASE_NOTES-1.0 RELEASE_NOTES-1.1 RELEASE_NOTES-2.0
RELEASE_NOTES-2.1 RELEASE_NOTES-2.2 RELEASE_NOTES-2.3 RELEASE_NOTES-2.4
RELEASE_NOTES-2.5 RELEASE_NOTES-2.6
(which are found in the source, and not delivered by Debian, nor the upstream
install process.
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 04:29:52PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> On my lenny system, I had this setting in main.cf:
> mailbox_command = procmail -a "$EXTENSION" DEFAULT=$HOME/Maildir/
> MAILDIR=$HOME/Maildir
>
> After doing `apt-get dist-upgrade' to squeeze, I found it had changed to
> this:
>
>
tags 857465 + wontfix
--
I believe that the postinst does the best it can at getting the FQDN into
main.cf -- this doesn't do much for the upgrade path though.
I agree with upstream that postfix should not be calling gethostbyname
at runtime -- if this is happening in a fresh install, then I'm in
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 03:43:26PM -0700, Erik Ziegenbalg wrote:
> There seems to be a bug with the lwres_context_recv function, when trying to
> recvfrom, it always returns back ECONNREFUSED (Connection refused) eventhough
> it is
> a UDP packet. This causes lwres_context_recv to return LWRES_R_
Package: anope
Severity: wishlist
--
Please include the attached apparmor profile as part of the packge.
It should be delivered as /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.anope.
See also https://wiki.debian.org/AppArmor
thanks,
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
wit
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 12:31:43PM +0200, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 09:19:26PM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 08:24:55PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > # we need libraries, and we need to be able to restart
> > /
severity 773170 important
--
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 09:33:16AM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 09:58:09 +0100 Petter Reinholdtsen
> wrote:
> Well, postfix uses Required-start: $named because it needs name
> resolution. And I guess dnsmasq provides $named by default, but th
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 06:02:56PM +0100, Grégoire Bellon-Gervais wrote:
>
> Subject: postfix: mydestination parameter contains 2 commas when main.cf is
> generated at installation
> Package: postfix
> Version: 2.9.6-2
> Severity: minor
Known bug that is not a functional bug, since commas are tr
Package: anope
Version: 2.0.2-1
Severity: serious
If the daemon is not running, reload should fail. It currently passes.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: anope
Version: 2.0.2-1
DAEMON_ARGS has "--logdir=/var/log/$NAME" and that means that when I say
'log { name = "/var/log/anope/services.log".', it decides that I clearly
want the log file to be named /var/log/anope/var/log/anope/services.log,
which is not very intuitive, and takes some tim
but I don't care either way on that part.
patch attached
lamont
>From ce09340e7c51f23c3e2b08b5e069355aa8eecdad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: LaMont Jones
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 08:16:06 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] add m_sql and m_regex_{posix,pcre} modules
---
debian/control | 2 +-
debia
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:34:43PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 08:29:14AM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote:
> > Package: anope
> > Version: 2.0.2-1
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > If the daemon is not running, reload should fail. It cu
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
--
lamont
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 07:28:02PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> testing currently has bind9 version 1:9.9.5.dfsg-5
>
> Upstream released 9.9.6 fixing some bugs with an impact on compatibility
> and at least one appears to be security related
> "Corrected bugs in the handling of wildcard records b
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 08:06:02PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> In the particular case, it has been suggested that the final changes
> compared to testing will be 87 000 (or more) lines. Unless 97+% of this
> is pure documentational/auto-generated changes, which can be filtered
> out and turn thi
101 - 200 of 421 matches
Mail list logo
