Bug#245200: Info received (was upgrade postalias pukes on main.cf: virtual_alias_maps = ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap_aliases.cf)

On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 11:20:43PM -0500, Dan MacNeil wrote: > I should also mention that it is reasonable to expect that > postalias won't work on an file with an ldap query That's why newaliases uses alias_database, while the alias lookups use alias_maps: # The alias_maps parameter specifies th

Bug#292446: modutils: udebs missing Section and Priority

On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 09:22:10PM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 01:25:33PM +1100, Angus Lees wrote: > > Package: modutils > > Version: 2.4.26-1.1 > > Severity: normal > > There should be "Section: debian-installer" and "Prio

Bug#292446: modutils: udebs missing Section and Priority

On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 01:25:33PM +1100, Angus Lees wrote: > Package: modutils > Version: 2.4.26-1.1 > Severity: normal > There should be "Section: debian-installer" and "Priority: extra" > fields in there (same for modutils-full). Interestingly, those fields are present in the source tree I have

Bug#333434: [hppa] Cannot compile simple program linked against libglew

tags 333434 + patch severity 333434 serious -- The patch below fixes this issue. (Specifically, since gcc is allowed to have architecture-specific components in the link phase, you may not link things built with gcc using ld. Likewise, if building g++ objects, you must link with g++.) For pushin

Bug#325624: marked as done (gnome-schedule: NEWS.gz is an empty file)

GNOME > desk > ii python2.3-gtk22.6.2-1Python bindings for the GTK+ > widge > > gnome-schedule recommends no packages. > > -- no debconf information > > ------- > Received: (at 325624-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Dec

Bug#347200: dnsutils: cannot parse /etc/resolv.conf

severity 347200 normal -- On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 07:04:59PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > I'm unable to use the current versions of dig and host to resolve > hostnames. Other applications work fine - wget for instance. My > resolv.conf is the same as it has always been - generated by pump from > dhcp

Bug#344538: hppa dependency problems on build of pdns

On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:08:14AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > or a bug in some > > maintainer script or other; > How a bug in a maintainer script could have the result that installing > an arch-all package fails because an other arch-all package is no

Bug#336015: symbol lookup error

tags 336015 unreproducible -- > piper:~# sendmail > sendmail: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libpostfix-global.so.1: > undefined symbol: mail_conf_lookup_evah > piper:~# echo $? > 127 I can't reproduce this. lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". T

Bug#322771: postfix: smtp(8) can't resolve localhost any more

On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 09:30:38PM +0200, Beat Bolli wrote: > Ever since the update of libc6 to 2.3.5, I get the following log entries > when sending or receiving mail (wrapped for legibility): > > Aug 12 20:53:21 bolli postfix/smtp[6973]: E8E774BBAA: \ > to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=none, delay=

Bug#322320: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#322320: Postfix configuration in /etc/postfix incomplete)

On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 03:24:21AM +0800, Uwe Dippel wrote: > This is bad news. The reasoning is flawed from the start: > 1. There is no hint that /usr/share/postfix/main.cf.dist would be the > original main.cf. And it even isn't. How to know ? well, except for these lines at the start of /etc/po

Bug#322320: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#322320: Postfix configuration in /etc/postfix incomplete)

On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 11:03:11AM +0800, Uwe Dippel wrote: > LaMont Jones wrote: > Well, saw this and asked myself what 'fuller' means. I don't expect that > one to be 'fuller', but eventually 'original'. Ah, ok. > How about something like >

Bug#322320: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#322320: Postfix configuration in /etc/postfix incomplete)

On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 12:55:18PM +0800, Uwe Dippel wrote: > LaMont Jones wrote: > Obvious. Obvious ! > This is - maybe only my - personal style. > 1. It avoids typos (if I retyped the line) > 2. It avoids opening any other file > > I (use vi) simply /[parameter to be

Bug#315939: errors in log: Jun 27 02:35:01 lyra postfix/pipe[12885]: fatal: service mailman requires privileged operation

On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 06:45:06PM +0100, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 03:09:01AM +0800, Anand Vaidya wrote: > > Further there is a line break just before ${nexthop} ${user} in the argv > > line. Is that OK? I don't think so. > > > > argv=/usr/lib/mailman/bin/postfix-to-mailman

Bug#345798: nmap: New upstream release 3.95

tags 345798 + pending -- > nmap 3.95 released Thu, 8 Dec 2005: > http://seclists.org/lists/nmap-hackers/2005/Oct-Dec/0002.html And packaged December 9. Now I just need to figure out why I didn't actually upload it. :-( lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Bug#345887: acknowledged by developer (Bug#345887: fixed in confluence 0.10.6-3)

On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 09:13:33PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > Hi buildd/P-a-s maintainers, > since confluence should now build on all debian archs, I'd like to > request its removal from Packages-arch-specific, and a change of its > wanna-build state on mips, mipsel and s390 to Needs-Build. Re

Bug#326961: acknowledged by developer (Bug#326961: fixed in iproute 20041019-4)

reopen 326961 -- You need the 2nd half of the patch (found in my reply to the original bug report, as well as below...) thanks, lamont diff -urNad iproute-20041019/tc/paretonormal.c /tmp/dpep.9YHbob/iproute-20041019/tc/pareton

Bug#311828: modutils: ksyms does not work for 2.6.x kernels also

tags 311828 + wontfix -- > ~$ /sbin/ksyms > ksyms: QM_MODULES: Function not implemented > $ uname -r > 2.6.14 Use module-init-tools for 2.6 kernels. lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#313229: bind9-host: Returns host: couldn't get address for '': not found

tags 313229 + unreproducible -- On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 04:32:43PM +0100, Colin Davis wrote: > The package returns: > host: couldn't get address for '': not found > when running: host xxx.tld % host xxx.tld Host xxx.tld not found: 3(NXDOMAIN) % host www.cc www.cc has address 198.41.1.40 Looks li

Bug#163134: postfix-tls: Upgrade from Debian 3.0 to 3.1 cause postfix to fail.

On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 01:19:04AM +0200, Robert Cheramy wrote: > when upgrading from debian 3.0 to 3.1, postfix-tls not working causes > postfix fail with the error: > Jun 17 00:38:23 vd postfix/smtpd[13446]: fatal: no SASL authentication > mechanisms > My /etc/postfix/sasl/smtp.d file looked lik

Bug#310597: postfix-ldap: newaliases command breaks upgrade on systems with alias_maps using LDAP

On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 10:14:35AM -0400, Stephen Touset wrote: > # fetch aliases from LDAP and /etc/aliases > alias_maps = ldap:ldapalias hash:/etc/aliases > alias_database = ldap:ldapalias hash:/etc/aliases Per the documentation: alias_maps is the list of maps to query for aliases. Since not a

Bug#305311: postfix: dpkg-buildpackage only works once

fixed in 2.2.2-1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#271960: postfix - rejects ipv6 literal addresses in ehlo

On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 03:37:12PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > postfix rejects literal ipv6 addresses in ehlo commands. Fixed in 2.2. lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#304920: postfix: more info about the sasl bug in 2.2.2-1

On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 08:03:12PM -0700, Paul Traina wrote: > The problem is that patches/10tls.dpatch is not being executed. > the permissions on this file are 644 instead of 755, which is > probably why dpatch is not running. Actually, the problem is the lack of '10tls' in debian/patches/00list

Bug#305521: dia_0.94.0-7: FTBFS with gcc-4.0

On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 05:52:54PM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote: > On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 08:02 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > shape_info.c:902: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of > > > '__builtin_strcmp' differ in signedness > > > shape_info.c:902: warning: pointer targets in p

Bug#308815: FTBFS: gcc-4.0 errors

Package: tar Version: 1.15-1 Severity: normal Tags: patch > make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/tar-1.15.1/tests' > if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../lib -I../lib -I../src-O2 -g > -Wall -MT genfile.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/genfile.Tpo" -c -o genfile.o > genfile.c; \ > then mv -f ".

Bug#309025: ghc6: Crashes with bus error on hppa

> hppa people, any idea what's going on? Bus errors happen when support for unaligned load/stores is turned off. For various reasons, support is disabled on sarti. lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#309025: ghc6: Crashes with bus error on hppa

On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 02:27:52PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote: tags 309025 - unreproducible > > make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/missingh-0.11.0' > > ghc -package Cabal Setup.lhs -o setup > > make[1]: *** [setup] Bus error > Works for me on paer: > > hppa people, any idea what's going on?

Bug#309025: ghc6: Crashes with bus error on hppa

On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 08:18:43PM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote: > > hppa people, any idea what's going on? > echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/unaligned-trap > and try again. Gah. Let me try that again from the top. echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/unaligned-trap and you'll find t

Bug#309025: ghc6: Crashes with bus error on hppa

On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 03:19:38PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote: > Can someone please make paer and sarti agree on the value, so either the > build works or I can debug it? Paer has been changed. cat /proc/sys/kernel/unaligned-trap to verify, should be '0'. (Worse things happen on the buildd when it'

Bug#233891: [hppa] maxima/acl2 failures at -O1/-O2, -O0 ok

On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 03:58:23PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote: > it seems that acl2 now builds on hppa. Can we close this bug? yes. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#292928: transport map affects all MXs?

On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 12:27:25AM -0800, Ryan Murray wrote: > With a transport map of: > somehost.example.com smtp:somehost.example.com:portnum > If somehost.example.com has two MXs, itself as lowest priority, and > mx.example.com at priority 10, postfix will try to deliver to mx.example.com > on

Bug#291031: additional Info regarding #291031

On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 05:12:31PM +0100, Sebastian Feltel wrote: > I was running into the same problems which Martin described while > upgrading postfix. I "solved" the problem by uncommenting the > newaliases-Section (line 438 - 450) in the postix postinst-Script. > For reference I've saved my

Bug#293046: postfix: Postfix/IPv6 in chrootjail are an OpenRelay

tags 293046 + moreinfo -- On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 10:17:49PM +0100, Nico Jochens wrote: > Sorry for my bad english. When the postfix with IPv6-patch is running in a > chrootjail, it's an OpenRelay. The reason is a bug in the IPv6-patch. > The entry "mynetworks" is not to evaluate, because the /pro

Bug#293501: postfix: Postfix 2.1.4-4 in unstable is an open relay unless relay_domains is explicitly set

tags 293501 - patch tags 293501 + moreinfo tags 293501 + unreproducible -- (No patch present, just a workaround that disables a major chunk of functionality...) 2.1.5-5 is the current version of postfix in sarge, and 2.1.5-6 is in unstable. Before being able to fix this bug, I'm going to need som

Bug#293889: postfix: Fresh installation does not write alias for root

severity 293889 normal -- > On fresh installation postfix _silently_ does not write alias for root. > That is, it installs with /etc/aliases like If /etc/aliases exists at install time, then it is left untouched, since the admin obviously has what he wants there. Your /etc/aliases is not from a

Bug#294124: error in Postfix - unallocated memory block?

On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 01:18:41AM +0100, Waldemar Dworakowski wrote: > Found something like line below in my error log. > Feb 6 02:34:00 localhost postfix/smtp[9644]: panic: myfree: corrupt > or unallocated memory block 1) Do you have the postfix-tls package installed, or just postfix? 2) If ye

Bug#305586: postfix: Still got the same issues when using 2.2.2-3

On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 10:54:24PM +0200, Roel van der Made wrote: > When trying 2.2.2-3 (yes, I already downgraded to 2.1.5-9 since that one > still works) I still got the same problems as mentioned in the report > before: Yeah... The fix only affects new installs. I'll have to go force things

Bug#306851: postfix: pid files doesnt get removed when stopping

On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 08:35:34AM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 12:18:28AM +0200, Martin Skøtt wrote: > > I discovered that stopping postfix (/etc/init.d/postfix stop) didn't > > result in /var/spool/postfix/pid/master.pid being removed. This > &

Bug#306851: postfix: pid files doesnt get removed when stopping

On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 12:18:28AM +0200, Martin Skøtt wrote: > I discovered that stopping postfix (/etc/init.d/postfix stop) didn't > result in /var/spool/postfix/pid/master.pid being removed. This > explains why the if-up script thought postfix was running. No it doesn't. The if-up script think

Bug#307439: (no subject)

On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 09:32:05PM -0700, John Hendrickson wrote: > Subject: bind9: no docs or manual apt-get install bind9-doc For man pages, start with man named. lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#305586: postfix: Still got the same issues when using 2.2.2-3

On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 05:11:15PM +0200, Roel van der Made wrote: > Just to keep things clear, 2.2.3-1 keeps nagging about the same sdbm > libs. Also it complaints, when installing, about not beiing allowd to > rename some bins in /usr/lib/postfix, when I remove them by hand the > install goes all

Bug#307780: SMTP Auth fails with latest postfix-tls (sarge)

On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 03:08:14PM +0200, Tim Weippert wrote: > May 5 14:56:55 hebus postfix/smtp[20410]: smtp_sasl_authenticate: > mail.topf-sicret.org[217.160.140.89]: SASL mechanisms DIGEST-MD5 > CRAM-MD5 > May 5 14:56:55 hebus postfix/master[20274]: warning: process > /usr/lib/postfix/smtp pi

Bug#305634: quintuple-agent: agpg crashes

tags 305634 + patch -- The issue is that the arglist is overrun by one argument. The patch below (and at http://patches.ubuntu.com/patches/quintuple-agent.malloc.patch) fixes the problem. lamont diff -ur quintuple-agent-1.0.4-5/agpg.c quintuple-agent-1.0.4/agpg.c --- quintuple-agent-1.0.4-5/agpg

Bug#300258: --ignore-file-name-case doesn't work

Package: diff Version: 2.8.1-7 Severity: normal As described in https://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=7291 diff --ignore-file-name-case does not appear to work. To reproduce: % mkdir a b % touch a/foo b/FOO % diff --ignore-file-name-case a b Only in a: foo Only in b: FOO lamont -- System

Bug#300278: defoma: debhelper files fail if defoma is removed before package

Package: defoma Version: 0.11.8-0.1 Severity: serious In the case where both defoma and, say fontconfig, are being removed in the same dpkg run, defoma was removed first, and then fontconfig's prerm script failed with: > Removing defoma ... > Purging configuration files for defoma ... > dpkg - wa

Bug#301146: util-linux: fdisk: bad debian patch

tags 301146 + sarge -- Fixed in 2.12l-1. lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#183163: CDB support in postfix with a postfix-cdb package

On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 05:01:42PM +0200, Loic Le Loarer wrote: > Since 2.2, Postfix has intergrated cdb support with tinycdb library. Is > it possible to have a postfix-cdb package nowadays ? It would be helpful > (I think cdb maps use less memory and is faster). Once tinycdb has a shared lib, I

Bug#316253: please provide libcdb.so

Package: tinycdb Version: 0.74-1 Severity: wishlist Please provide libcdb.so, so that shared libraries can link against it. This is preventing postfix from providing CDB map support. thanks, lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Bug#319143: Please integreate the path

On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 02:10:59PM +0200, Aurélien Labrosse EXT RSC-CIP-GRE wrote: > Could you integrate the patch or at least change the dependency from > slang1a-utf8 to libslang1-utf8 ? This is needed to create pbuilder > images.. Just waiting for a libc6 upload to fix a header-file FTBFS, and

Bug#300860: more complete patch for klic

5-07-23 14:23:00.0 -0600 +++ klic-3.003/debian/changelog 2005-07-23 13:59:07.0 -0600 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +klic (3.003-2ubuntu1) breezy; urgency=low + + * fix compile errors. Closes: Debian #300860 + + -- LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat, 23 Jul 2005 13:58:54 -0600 + klic (3.00

Bug#300278: defoma: debhelper files fail if defoma is removed before package

On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 02:26:41AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > I'm not convinced that this is actually a bug in defoma; the trouble is that > the failure happens in the fontconfig *pre*rm script, and fontconfig depends > on defoma -- so how is it possible that defoma's files have been removed >

Bug#317018: postfix and virtual develery with mysql

On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 05:30:56PM +0200, Michael Rasmussen wrote: > The patch solves the problem when you have enabled virtual delivery in > postfix thru an external source like a database or ldap and postfix runs > in chroot mode, which is the default configuration in Sarge. The problem The othe

Bug#317825: ITP: dnspython -- ITP: dnspython: DNS module for python

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist In TLA at http://www.dnspython.org/archives/2005-public/dnspython, I've chatted with upstream about packaging it. * Package name: dnspython Version : x.y.z Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.example.org/ * Li

Bug#301423: SASL Configuration Location Broken

On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 02:41:33PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Thanks - I encountered this problem & saved some time thanks to your > report - except that you meant /usr/lib/sasl2/smtpd.conf - right? > /var/... didn't work - /usr/... did : ) /usr/ - where it doesn't belong, by policy... he

Bug#304559: postfix: upgrade doesn't work cleanly

On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 01:58:32AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Installing new version of config file /etc/postfix/postfix-files ... > postconf: error while loading shared libraries: libpostfix-global.so.1: > cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Are there any diversions of pos

Bug#335734: postfix with TLS cannot locate libz.so

reassign 335734 libssl0.9.8 merge 335734 335271 -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#331684: Remove bidwatcher from the archive

Package: ftp.debian.org Please remove bidwatcher from the archive - it's broken, has outstanding security vuls, and upstream has been a bit distracted lately. We'll re-upload it when there's a new version that once again works. thanks lamont -- On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 10:48:20AM +0200, Moritz

Bug#327070: Essential package util-linux depends on priority=extra slang1a-utf8

On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 02:12:48PM +0200, Ariel Garcia wrote: > An essential/required package like util-linux shouldn't depend on one > (slang1a-utf8) which is Priority: extra , right? Which is why it now Depends: libslang2, which is priority important. Which is to say, libslang2 is really requi

Bug#307210: patch for sa_restorer bug

tags 307210 + patch -- The patch below fixes the problem. thanks, lamont diff -ur t/nufw-1.0/src/nuauth/authsrv.c nufw-1.0/src/nuauth/authsrv.c --- t/nufw-1.0/src/nuauth/authsrv.c 2005-03-03 01:23:54.0 -0700 +++

Bug#308693: udev: Doesn't create /dev/rtc on amd64

tags 308693 + wontfix -- hwclockfirst.sh must run before modules are loaded [1], therefore, any kernel which is foolish enough to have CONFIG_RTC=m will have errors in hwclockfirst.sh, and the accompanying issues found in Bug#50572. The good news is that hwclock.sh runs shortly after that, and wi

Bug#324157: util-linux: bashisms in init.d scripts

severity 323872 serious close 324157 merge 324157 323872 -- Dup. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#329782: hplip: FTBFS if /usr/share/applications does not exist

Package: hplip Severity: important Version: 0.9.5-3 > checking for icon directory... none ... > if [ "" = "hplip.desktop" ]; then \ ... > fi > if [ "" = "hplip" ]; then \ >echo -e "?package(xbase):command=\"/usr/lib/hplip/toolbox\" > icon=\"/usr/share/hplip/data/images/HPmenu.png\" \\" > ./;

Bug#330209: dnsutils: weird error when /etc/resolv.conf contains hostname for nameserver

severity 330209 wishlist -- On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 08:25:28PM +0200, Daniel Brockman wrote: > $ echo nameserver a.root-servers.net > /etc/resolv.conf > $ dig example.com > dig: couldn't get address for ' I : not found > $ dig example.com > dig: couldn't get address for ' y ': not found

Bug#326110: sudo: Requires password for NOPASSWD invocation

On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 01:45:37PM -0700, Ryan Lovett wrote: > However, when otheruser attempts to run the same command as an unlisted > user, sudo prompts for a password: This is correct behavior. For a similar example, try logging into the system with a non-existant user: you will be prompted f

Bug#43486: getty/init/X locking issues

On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 04:28:28PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > LaMont Jones, le Tue 06 Sep 2005 08:26:27 -0600, a écrit : > > And vt 2-15 when opened to check them, are also busy... > No: vt_1_ is opened to check them. And _WE_ have them open as stdin. lamont

Bug#43486: getty/init/X locking issues

On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 10:26:09PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > I hope to have found some correct fix, please see patch. Yes, linux has > been providing VT_GETSTATE since something like 1.0. > > Only vt 2-15 can be checked: 1 is always busy, and the size of the mask > is limited. But that shoul

Bug#326961: FTBFS: normal.c heap corrution due to table overflow

t the detected heap corruption. Additionally, the arguments to calloc are backwards. The patch below fixes this. lamont = #! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run ## normal.dpatch by LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ## ## All line

Bug#326961: Acknowledgement (FTBFS: normal.c heap corrution due to table overflow)

Sadly, I spoke too quickly... Here's the corrected patch, which also fixes tc/paretonormal.c :-( lamont #! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run ## normal.dpatch by LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ## ## All lines beginning with `## DP:' are a description of the patch. ## DP: Cor

Bug#320946: util-linx: Uninstallable due to slang1 transition

On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 12:02:37PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > util-linux needs to be changed to account for the slang1 transition. > This is because util-linux has a versioned Pre-Depends on slang1a-utf8, > while slang1a-utf8 is now merely provided by libslang1-utf8, which does > not work with o

Bug#373648: new boinc ports

On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 09:29:29PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > Package: nmap > Version: 4.10-1 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > Fixed in 4.11-1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#405320: postfix: [INTL:ca] Catalan debconf templates translation update

On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 04:06:24PM +0100, Jordà Polo wrote: > Here is an update for the Catalan debconf templates translation. Here's a slightly fuzzy version of the file for 2.3.6-2 lamont # # Catalan translation for postfix package. # Copyright (C) 2006 LaMont Jones. # This file is dis

Bug#291288: SPF patched postfix

On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 04:50:04PM -0600, Taral wrote: > I've patched up 2.3.6-2 with SPF and made the bits available: > http://taral.dreamhost.com/postfix_2.3.6-2.spf.diff.gz > http://taral.dreamhost.com/postfix_2.3.6-2.spf.dsc I'll upload SPF when upstream includes it. lamont -- To UNSUBSCRI

Bug#398646: postfix-tls: dovecot-sasl support

On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 09:34:21PM +0100, Kurt Ã?rdal wrote: > Can you please support dovecot sasl in the > postfix-tls package as a choice of sasl > implementations? At first glance, it appears that this might already be there... With the version of postfix in testing, see if installing dovecot

Bug#398180: FTBFS: experimental on alpha

On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 10:36:10AM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > Package: postfix > Version: postfix_2.4-20061019-2 > Severity: normal > > xsasl_cyrus_server.c:179: error: 'xsasl_getconfpath' undeclared here > (not in a I believe that this is fixed in the latest postfix experimental upload (anyt

Bug#394172: FTBFS on ia64: analyt.c:233: relocation truncated to fit: GPREL22 ...

On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 03:31:05PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 02:32:00PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Can you try adding "CFLAGS=-g -Wall -ffunction-sections" at the bottom > of debian/rules? It works fine on merulo at least. -ffunction-sections stands a good chance

Bug#406037: Acknowledgement (gnuradio_3.0.2-2(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: sdcc SEGV)

reassign 406037 sdcc severity 406037 normal merge 394394 406037 -- oops. already filed this bug. sorry, lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#406041: qscintilla is not binNMU-safe

Package: qscintilla Version: 1.6-2 Because libqscintilla-dev Depends: on the exact version of libqscintilla6 (or whatever soname), and is arch: all while the library is arch-specific, binNMU's of qscintilla result in an unininstallable libqscintilla-dev on whatever architecture does the binNMU. T

Bug#406329: twinkle_1:0.9-6(ia64/testing): FTBFS: unresolved externals

On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 08:03:55PM +, Mark Purcell wrote: > I'm also a little curious that this is only happening on ia64, if it was a > source problem I would imagine it would also be occurring on other arch's as > well. > Perhaps we could reschedule a rebuild, or how can I get the necessary

Bug#317018: postfix and virtual develery with mysql

On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 06:22:39PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > + # if postfix-mysql is installed, attempt to ensure mysqld's > + # socket is available if we can. > + [ -f /usr/lib/postfix/dict_mysql.so ] && \ > +

Bug#389645: Shallo I fix it? Shall I NMU?

On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 06:04:16PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: > if you are busy with your Ubuntu work, I can understand that. It is not > as important as the boring Debian stuff. But please react to this > message. Shall I fix the problem and NMU util-linux? Is anybody working > on that? And yes,

Bug#394877: Processed: Re: Bug#394877: base: device files are not used uniquely

What are the contents of /proc/mounts? lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#396186: bind9: Installation breaks with shadow passwords disabled

reassign 396186 adduser severity 396186 normal merge 396186 330471 -- This is an adduser bug, not a bind9 bug. lamont On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 11:52:29AM +, Kevin Campbell wrote: > Package: bind9 > Version: 1:9.3.2-P1.0-1 > Severity: important > > The bind9 installation appears to fail when

Bug#396062: nmap does not work on distant host

On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 04:37:09PM +0100, Fabrice Dagorn wrote: > Architecture : ARM > Kernel Version : 2.6.16 > Nmap does not work on my NSLU2 (Debian testing). > It works on localhost, but nowhere else. What does tcpdump show as the activity during the nmap 192.168.2.251? lamont -- To UNSUBS

Bug#392667: closed by LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#392667: bind9 dependency problem in stable)

On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 09:53:51PM -0600, Mike wrote: > I have been using debian for several years now and I think it is the best > Linux distribution. It's just such a shame that all the people actually > associated with it are such jerks. This was most definitely not a user error. > I even put

Bug#398396: postfix: FTBFS on hurd-i386: make tidy fails in clean rule

On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 04:47:32PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > thanks for applying the 30_hurd.dpatch, unfortunately postfix still > FTBFS: I don't have a hurd box to work on fixing this. patch? lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C

Bug#398498: mount says loop device is writable, bit it isn't.

On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 12:13:53AM -0500, A. Costa wrote: > This looks like one of those bugs that are so old and people are so > accustomed to that they've ceased to think of it as bug, it just seems > normal to them. I didn't find a report on it in the BTS, and it seems > there should be one...

Bug#398449: this is bug #386226

severity 398449 important merge 398449 386226 -- On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 03:36:18AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=386226 Merged. Thanks, lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac

Bug#399370: util-linux: split system time utilites (collect all bugs, wish to maintain (help))

On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 03:10:38PM +0100, Oleg Verych wrote: > Upsteram util-linux package is unmaintained, even lkml got thread on it: > > As i'm interesting in timekeeping, updated hwclock.sh, now seeing how > many clock related

Bug#399802: Hostname cannot be canonicalized

On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 09:16:54PM -0800, Jack Bates wrote: > I don't set myhostname in main.cf. Postfix used to successfully get > myhostname from the resolver or from /etc/mailname. I confirmed that > `hostname --fqdn` still reports tor.lat, and /etc/mailname still > contains tor.lat, but Postfix

Bug#294210: postfix can not start after fresh install

tags 294210 - patch -- No patch given. On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 03:14:46PM +0100, Fabien VALLON wrote: > Package: postfix > Version: 2.1.5-5 Fixed in 2.1.5-6 lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#295633: expect_5.42.1-1.2(i386/unstable): FTBFS: really build-depends autoconf2.13

Package: expect Version: 5.42.1-1.2 Severity: serious Tags: patch 1) On a machine with autoconf installed, the package fails to build - it really build-depends on autoconf2.13, not autoconf. A patch to fix this is available from http://patches.ubuntu.com/patches/expect.autoconf.diff 2) config.gu

Bug#290170: mount segfaults when mounting a new partition (160 GB)

On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 06:18:21PM -0500, Jeff Abrahamson wrote: > (Log output from first call is below, second call never returns, no > log output.) That's the kernel segfaulting, not mount. > Jan 12 18:09:25 krypton kernel: EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,65)): > ext3_check_de > scriptors: Block

Bug#257096: noexec /var breaks postfix chroot

On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 05:11:55PM +0100, Klaus Fuerstberger wrote: > With Postfix 2.1.4-5 the Problem still appears. No Mails reaches the > relayhost on my Firewalls with stmp=chroot and /var mounted noexec. Your choices are: 1) mount /var/ without noexec 2) unchroot postfix This is because it

Bug#203433: nmap false positive

On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 06:04:15PM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote: > It's a non-issue: That's why it's wishlist and tagged 'wontfix'. It's not an nmap problem. OTOH, closing it will only tend to get other people to submit it as they encounter this same non-issue. lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t

Bug#277532: nmap -oS segfault

On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 02:43:07AM +0100, christophe wrote: > Ok, iirc I replied directly to floydor, instead of replying to the list, > apologies for that. > > As the nmap debian package doesn't have debug turned on, I downloaded > the last nmap version (3.81) from insecure.org and compiled it wi

Bug#238151: fix for #238151

severity 238151 important -- On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 02:12:53PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > I prepare a porter NMU for util-linux to fix #238151 according to > Developers reference 5.10.2.2, it will hit unstable in 7 days from now, > 4.3.2005. Diff??? lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA

Bug#410075: smbmount not compatible with utf-8

reassign 410075 smbfs -- clearly not a mount bug, possibly an smbmount bug??? lamont On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 03:55:49PM +0100, Jean-Michel wrote: > Package: mount > Version: 2.12r-15 > Severity: normal > > On my new debian etch, which is about full-UTF8 (by default), > I have a filesystem expor

Bug#410871: 2.3.7-2 still not installable

On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:58:07AM +, Magnus Therning wrote: > I just tried upgrading to 2.3.7-2 and it failed in the exact way > described in bug #410871 (verified by adding the 'set -x' in > postfix.postinst). My attempts to install postfix from experimental > failed in the same way, as did

Bug#410871: 2.3.7-2 still not installable

On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:58:07AM +, Magnus Therning wrote: > I just tried upgrading to 2.3.7-2 and it failed in the exact way > described in bug #410871 (verified by adding the 'set -x' in > postfix.postinst). My attempts to install postfix from experimental > failed in the same way, as did

Bug#410871: 2.3.7-2 still not installable

On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 02:23:43PM +, Magnus Therning wrote: > On 2/14/07, LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The installation worked fine, but there now seems to be something else > # mailq > postqueue: warning: Mail system is down -- accessing queue directly

  1   2   3   4   5   >