take more work to integrate it, but it's less critical and
is only a feature request that I'm not sure I want to add. Either way I
guess that you can expect a fixed version to be uploaded to Debian soon
after etch (though I can't speak for the pkg-xfce team).
Thanks,
James
--
ilder commands.
>
Does
$ svn-buildpackage --svn-builder 'debuild --set-envvar=foo=bar'
do what you would like?
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/n
have your config
if there is nothing private in it so that I can set up test server
to beat up?
Thanks,
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
T
On (13/12/06 09:56), Peter Chubb wrote:
> >>>>> "James" == James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> James> Unfortunately the traces you provided are not that
> James> informative. It would be great to get some more information on
>
though we could perhaps get an
exception if we can provide a targeted fix there's no guarantee we would
even have found the bug by the time the release comes.
Thanks,
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On (14/12/06 18:44), James Westby wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For a start I don't know how to create a Base64 encoded key, do you?
Ok, sorry for that one, I should have done some more research. PEM
format keys/certificates are base64 encoded. This is the default format
and the most
uld be to add support for reading PKCS#8 keys, or at the
very least give a sensible error message.
Have you got your certificate up and running with the converted one now?
Thanks,
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.
rday:
>
> http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnutls-dev/2006-December/001313.html
>
Hi,
Thanks for your work. I would like to see the response from upstream
before we make any decision for Debian. (Same for the other patch as
well.)
I just wanted to let you know your patches weren&#x
On (04/01/07 09:21), Max Kellermann wrote:
> On 2006/12/17 21:10, James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks for your work. I would like to see the response from upstream
> > before we make any decision for Debian. (Same for the other patch as
> > well.)
>
&
might well stop
working.
Thanks
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256
Index: debi
On (23/11/06 20:30), James Westby wrote:
> 2) If you do not want to add a new upstream version to etch now then remove
> the warning from the code. As far as I know there is no
> functionality loss from this.
>
> I attach two patches, one for each solution. (Please not
t the normal deprecation
warnings of bzr.
As I am not the maintainer of either package I will only reassign this
once, and will not interfere if you wish to reasssign it back, but
please provide an explanation if you wish to do that.
Thanks,
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B57
ggest you send a
mail to the bug, and copy me, and say so, then I will take that as a
prod to actually clean it up so it can be considered for inclusion.
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T
On (01/11/06 13:53), David Härdeman wrote:
> tags 330592 +unreproducible
> thanks
>
> James Westby wrote:
> > So I managed to get the above message (for policy version 20) by
> > # rm -rf /etc/selinux
> >
> > However it did not cause a segfault, and I got a c
On (18/11/06 19:11), Christoph Berg wrote:
> noowner 325824
> retitle 325824 RFP: ninja -- Privilege escalation detection system for
> GNU\Linux
> thanks
>
> Re: James Westby 2006-09-09 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Are you still interested in packaging ninja?
> >
Package: ikiwiki
Version: 1.33
Severity: important
Hi Joey,
I have just upgraded my server to etch from sarge with a backport of
ikiwiki from a couple of months ago.
I use a copy of the templates in a different dir referenced from the
setup files, to allow easier editing of them.
Upon the dis
tom
> templatedir.
>
Ah, apologies for the bogus report then.
Perhaps this is a candidate for a backport fix to etch as it can interfere
with upgrades?
Thanks for all your great work.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+
I didn't think the SGS Thompson name was used any
more, even if it still exists.
Thanks,
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wn as FTBFS), usually on the autobuilders. This refers to the Debian
source package. The fact that you can't build from the loop-aes-source
against newer kernels is regrettable, but does not warrant a bug of
severity serious I'm afraid.
Thanks,
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key
than the full version. This removes a warning from
+dpkg-source when building and Closes: #409981. Thanks to James Vega.
- -- James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:17:09 +
+ -- James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:16:28 +
bzr-builddeb (0.14
On (18/03/07 13:06), Michael Biebl wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just wanted to draw your attention to loggerhead [1].
> I don't know bazaar-webserve well enough and also played only a little
> with loggerhead, so I can't make a fair comparison.
>
> Might be interesting for bzr.debian.org though.
>
Hi
whereas your suggestion is
This option should be chosen only if the server is directly connected
to the Internet.
Is there some misunderstanding here of the use of "directly connected"
in this context?
Thanks,
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jame
Python 2.6
Thanks,
A fix for this is planned for the next upload.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
robably a bug. Some
dependencies are hard to specify in a pleasant way though, so it might
get a little ugly.
I hope this helps,
Thanks,
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - se
> faster.
I'm not sure about "allowing to maintain". "allowing you to maintain" is
better, but personal. "allowing faster mounting and maintenance of the
VPS" would be my preferred wording.
Thanks,
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-
copies /bin/echo into the initramfs as echo -n is needed, and the
builtin isn't guaranteed to use it.
I would be happy to test any packages that you create if you would like.
Thanks for all your work,
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestb
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: bazaar-webserve
Version : Unknown
Upstream Author : Goffredo Baroncelli
* URL : http://goffredo-baroncelli.homelinux.net/bazaar-dev/
* License : GPL
Programmin
server?
Do you see the same backtrace as originally submitted?
Could you also provide the options from your "SSL" tab of the selected
account please.
Thanks,
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&a
Hi,
It appears as if emma is only used for a code coverage target in the
build file, and as such can be happily disabled. Then the jars can be
removed.
Does the same occur for the commons-* jars as well? They are in the
Build-Depends, so it appears that the intent is to use external ones.
Shou
On (03/09/06 18:17), Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Le mercredi 30 août 2006, James Westby a écrit :
> >
> > The upstream name of this software is bazaar-webserve, so I am going
> > with that, but bzr-webserve would fit in better with the rest of the
> > debian bzr naming s
On (02/10/06 10:49), Michal Čihař wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:07:14 +0100
> James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am ignorant about this package, could you tell me whether the source
> > is included?
>
> What do you exactly mean by source? Packaging only
security bug prompted an API change, hence the new
package?
Is it satisfactory for this bug to wait and be resolved by the removal
of -2?
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM
On (23/08/06 18:58), Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 04:05:49PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
> > Can I ask how this should have been handled, as the two packages provide
> > the same files, but a security bug prompted an API change, hence the new
> > package?
>
On (23/08/06 14:31), Steve Langasek wrote:
> reassign 384324 ftp.debian.org
> severity 384324 important
> retitle 384324 please lower the override priority for libtasn1-3-bin and
> libtasn1-2-bin
> thanks
>
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 06:07:23PM +0100, James Westby wrote
On (22/09/06 11:44), James Westby wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The developer sent me the 0.10 release yesterday, so I have polished off
> the package to have something usable hopefully.
>
> I have placed packages (source and _all) at
>
> http://jameswestby.net/debian/
>
>
it to be closed.
I had to reinstall my system a while ago, and that might have something
to do with it.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBS
Package: pkg-config
Version: 0.21-1
Tags: patch
Followup-For: Bug #217902
Hi,
Someone asked for this on #debian-devel today so I threw a patch
together without first checking the BTS.
This patch adds a --arch option that you pass a triple arch-os-gnu and
it then searches /usr/lib/arch-os-gnu/pkg
ome consideration of
these issues? Will this happen on the trip through the NEW queue?
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
..", is there a way
to do this? It was annoying having to restart the installer every time I
wanted to try something different. Could you point me to the apprpriate
package for this, I'm not sure it is partman-crypto]
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://james
On (10/10/06 09:19), Max Vozeler wrote:
> Hi James,
Hi Max,
>
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 11:59:55PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
> > I am playing around with the installer and I believe I have hit this
> > problem.
> >
> > If I select automatically set up
ade harder, so
that more key presses are required before partman-crypto is reached, and
so increasing the entropy in the pool without the user realising it is
for encryption.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edC
Package: partman-auto-crypto
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
Please consider this the lowest severity bug report from me, it is just
a suggestion.
Could support be added for just crypto setup without LVM, using
loop-aes. Perhaps waiting until after #381895 is fixed, so that the root
partition can be encr
On (10/10/06 16:33), Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> On Oct 10, 2006, at 3:39 PM, James Westby wrote:
>
> >I had a couple of idea while I was typing to generate keys in this
> >fashion. Here they are in no particular order.
> >
> >1) Make a game that involves typ
Package: partman-crypto
Severity: normal
Hello again,
I used manual partitioning, and created one large
dm-crypt partiton, and when I went to configure it I got
An Error occured while configuring encrypted volumes
The configuration has been aborted.
The log said
Check kernel for support
On (10/10/06 23:55), Max Vozeler wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 08:39:07PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
> > 1) Make a game that involves typing,
> >
> > I was reminded of a game called Daley Thompson's Decathlon, which
> > involved bashng t
he previous one that
also starts at 0 (possibly just the previous). If it starts later, look
for the second starting at 0 going backwards.
It all sounds a little hackish though. Do you know if there is any other
way to get this info?
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- ht
Package: partman-crypto
Severity: normal
Hi,
I was installing in a VM, and did manual partitioning to try loop-aes.
I had the first partition for / unencrypted, then two partitions, a
random key for swap, and a GPG encrypted key for /home. I used
twofish128 for minimum impact while testing. The
llows me to configure in the LVM on crypt case that the auto
installer creates (as long as I didn't make a transcription error).
Apologies for the ugly code,
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&
> This tool is needed by ophcrack, "a Microsoft Windows password cracker using
> rainbow tables".
>
Hi Adam,
I don't know if this is going to be the description for the package, but
it is more a description of another package. It would be good if you
could explain what
package wnpp
reopen 325824
thanks
Hi,
Are you still interested in packaging ninja?
I have reopened the bug, as if you are not, I will look in to packaging
it myself.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N
,
I already have an ITP open for this package under a different name. I
have now merged the bugs.
I have not finished the package yet as the author told me he would start
making releases in a form that was easier to package.
Let me know if you are still interested in packaging the software.
J
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi,
I'll take this one. I package another piece of software by the same
author.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nis
On (12/09/06 15:15), Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
> I have merged this bug. Sorry for the noise. James: would you like to do
> co-maintaining ?
>
Yes, that would be fine with me. Contact me in private to discuss it.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13--
e it
from here, but only if you add a license and copyright information.
There are also a few other things that would be good, but I'll leave
that for now.
Let me know if you want me to continue,
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
secc
Package: markdown
Version: 1.0.1-3
Severity: wishlist
Installing the Debian package means markdown can be used with
use Markdown;
Installing via CPAN gives
use Text::Markdown;
This means that it is difficult to write portable code that uses this
module, and the author of the code would have to
if anyone decides to adopt/qa upload/NMU.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256
#!/usr/bin/python
# This script creates index files for use with apt-listbugs.
# iI
layer-doc, and so the manpages wont be
installed with the binaries in many cases. I think this is more
important for the locales though.
Apologies for the extra stuff in the interdiff.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX
teh icons and
sound files from -doc to somaplayer, or make somaplayer Depends:
somplayer-doc, it's not that big, and you still get the archive savings.
I neglected to catch these problems in my NMU, sorry.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestb
any mention of this in a quick reading
of the webpage though. Is this just due to gnutls's support of OpenPGP
keys?
As always co-maintainers are welcome.
Thanks for bringing this to my attention.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net
On (19/09/06 21:56), Enrico Zini wrote:
> [Hi Dato!]
>
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 03:15:05PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
>
> > I have a basic package at
> > http://jameswestby.net/scratch/python-debtags_0.1-1.dsc
> > I am willing to finish the package off if you d
lp.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
n, but have you seen the log of
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=350740
This guy seems pretty interested and active. It seems your work and his
are uncoordinated at the moment though.
Thanks,
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
On (03/09/06 20:19), Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Sep 2006, James Westby wrote:
> > I have spoken to the developer, and he says he will make releases,
> > starting one for bzr 0.10 which is due out soon (tomorrow).
>
> I can wait at least the upcoming release, there&#
.BR aptitude (8),
+.BR debdiff (1),
+.SH AUTHOR
+Both checkdiffs and this manpage were written by James Westby. They are both
+(C) 2006 James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, and are licensed under the
+GPL v2 or later.
diff -Nru devscripts-2.9.21/checkdiffs.pl devscripts-2.9.22/checkdiffs.pl
--- dev
ent about the Debian
packaging to debian/copyright. See
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/03/msg00023.html
You don't need the configure target in debian/rules.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k
g to
work out why it thinks it needs it. What arch are you building on?
A couple more points
pkg-config is needed in Build-Depends. pbuilder can help to catch
this sort of thing.
libvisual is now libvisual-0.4-dev in sid (which you should be
targetting).
It looks like libtag1-dev shoul
tags 370496 +fixed-upstream
thanks my metal overlord
Hi,
I have just fixed this issue upstream.
Debian packages will be uploaded in a few days time after beta2 has
propogated to testing.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key
cdbs.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256
diff -u commons-httpclient-3.0.1/debian/control
commons-httpclient-3.0.1/debian/control
--- commons-httpclient-3.
Hi,
Attached is a better patch that fixes the build system to produce the
right jar.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256
diff -u commons-httpclient-3.
ssword on
> restart or shutdown.
You realise that the timeout is intended?
Do you have NOPASSWD in the apt-get or xfsm-shutdown-helper lines? That
will stop the password being asked for ever for those commands.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswe
the quese every three or
four package builds.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of &q
Hi,
I can reproduce this in an i386 pbuilder, but I cannot see the problem
quite yet.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
seems as if it requires a very broken setup to trigger it
(/etc/selinux/ unreadable).
I have also just noticed that you are on a different arch, so here is a
list of possible candidates for why I cannot reproduce,
amd64 vs i386
Kernel 2.6.13 vs 2.6.17
version of libselinux1
version of sysvin
Hi Martin,
sorry for the slow reply,
On (23/09/06 22:00), martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.09.23.1906 +0200]:
> > It attempts to get as much information as possible from files. It can be
> > run from an unpacked source dir, in
Hi,
Thanks for your attention to this bug.
Please note that the upstream patch has been extended, and the new
version should be taken instead.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)T
Package: lazr.restfulclient
Version: 0.12.0-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu precise ubuntu-patch
Hi,
setup.py includes some test dependencies in the requires list, but they
aren't in the package dependencies. This leads to a broken packag
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 10:10:23 +0100, arno renevier wrote:
> Package: python-debian
> Version: 0.1.14
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
> if python-apt is not installed, trying to import debian_bundle.changelog
> results in following exception
>
> >>> import debian_bundle.changelog
> Traceback (most rece
Package: predict
Version: 2.2.3-2
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu lucid ubuntu-patch
Hi,
In Ubuntu, we've applied the attached patch to achieve the following:
* Apply patch to fix buffer overflow on launching with -s (patch from
N
Package: pristine-tar
Version: 1.00
Severity: normal
Hi,
With
ftp://ftp.kde.org/pub/kde/stable/4.4.2/src/kde-l10n/kde-l10n-it-4.4.2.tar.bz2
and lots of the other tarballs there I see:
# pristine-tar -vd gendelta ../kde-l10n-it-4.4.2.tar.bz2 ../delta
pristine-tar: pristine-bz2 -v -d --no-keep g
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 12:33:51 -0400, jari.aa...@cante.net wrote:
> Package: seccure
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> Hi,
>
> The dpatch patch management system has been deprecated for some time. The
> Lintian currently flags use of dpatch packages as an error. The new 3.0
> packaging format
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi,
I am no longer maintaining this package, so it would benefit from
someone else taking care of it.
Thanks,
James
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi,
I am no longer maintaining this package. It would be good to have
someone else to take care of it.
Thanks,
James
k the problem.
I guess the bug can be closed, but there was definitely something
strange going on; two different systems a couple of months apart showing
the exact same symptoms.
Thanks,
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|
Package: aewm++
Severity: important
Version: 1.1.2-4
Tags: patch
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: origin-ubuntu ubuntu-patch hardy
Hi,
aewm++ Build-Depends on libx11-dev, but also requires libxext-dev.
Previously the former depended on the latter, but the version in
experimental drops that depe
Package: aewm++-goodies
Severity: important
Version: 1.0-8
Tags: patch
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: origin-ubuntu ubuntu-patch hardy
Hi,
aewm++-goodies Build-Depends on libx11-dev, but also requires libxext-dev.
Previously the former depended on the latter, but the version in
experimental d
Package: asmixer
Severity: important
Version: 0.5-12
Tags: patch
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: origin-ubuntu ubuntu-patch hardy
Hi,
asmixer Build-Depends on libx11-dev, but also requires libxext-dev.
Previously the former depended on the latter, but the version in
experimental drops that dep
Package: asmail
Severity: important
Version: 2.1-1
Tags: patch
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: origin-ubuntu ubuntu-patch hardy
Hi,
asmail Build-Depends on libx11-dev, but also requires libxext-dev.
Previously the former depended on the latter, but the version in
experimental drops that depend
Package: 9menu
Severity: important
Version: 1.8-1.1
Tags: patch
Hi,
9menu Build-Depends on libx11-dev, but also requires libxext-dev.
Previously the former depended on the latter, but the version in
experimental drops that dependency, meaning that your package
will FTBFS.
Ubuntu did this transi
Package: libbcel-java-doc
Version: 5.2-3
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: origin-ubuntu hardy
Hi,
libbcel-java-doc depends on libxerces2-java-doc, but that package
is in contrib. Policy requires that this relationship is not a
strict Depends.
This b
On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 08:03 +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> libxerces2-java-doc was moved to main some time ago.
>
> $ rmadison libxerces2-java-doc
> libxerces2-java-doc |2.6.1-1 | oldstable/contrib | source, all
> libxerces2-java-doc |2.6.1-2 | etch-m68k/contrib | source, all
> libxerces2-j
at the start of a sentence, since the case
> difference implies a different program.
That seems like a good convention to me, and one that I use. However it
does push technical writing conventions up against those of more
traditional writing. Much like the "V5" vs. "v5" issue, wh
e useful to have some more information about your setup and
any logs that you have.
If you can also give a simple way to reproduce that would speed up the
debugging process a lot.
Thanks,
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256
have much to offer.
It does require relibtoolizing, and that was hampered by a broken
libtool at the time. I have a patch to work around the latter if it
still occurs (you get an error about missing tags).
Apologies if I blocked anyone else from working on this.
Thanks,
James
--
Ja
lled. The error went away after installing graphviz, of course.
>
Could I suggest that instead the error message be patched to suggest
installing the graphviz package? Yes, it requires an extra step, but
that step is then obvious.
Thanks,
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13--
Package: bidentd
Version: 1.1.1-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: origin-ubuntu hardy ubuntu-patch
Hi,
In
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bidentd/+bug/75981
it was reported that the bidentd postinst would fail if update-inetd
was not available. The patch
Package: binkd
Version: 0.9.9+20060809-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: origin-ubuntu hardy ubuntu-patch
Hi,
In
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binkd/+bug/75987
it was reported that installation of binkd fails if update-inetd
is not available. The patch
Package: beagle
Version: 0.3.3-1
Severity: normal
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: origin-ubuntu hardy
Hi,
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/beagle/+bug/75338
states that beagle optionally uses ionice in
/etc/cron.daily/beagle-crawl-system.
Ubuntu decided to resolve this by adding a Su
Hi,
According to #466114 and
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/07/msg01013.html
update-inetd should not be depended on. In this case the
correct solution is just to depend on
"openbsd-inetd | inet-superserver". If it is not
correct to make this a strict dependency then the calls to
update
Package: bitscope
Version: 1.1-5
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: origin-ubuntu hardy ubuntu-patch
Hi,
Emmet Hikory made some changes to the .desktop file in Ubuntu that
would be good to include in Debian. I attach the patch to the
end of this mail.
Thanks,
James
-
Package: bitlbee
Version: 1.0.4-1
Severity: normal
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: origin-ubuntu hardy
Hi,
In
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bitlbee/+bug/75990
it was reported that installation of bitlbee fails if
update-inetd is not available.
The fix that was uploaded to Ubuntu
1 - 100 of 578 matches
Mail list logo
