On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 12:50 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 21:21 +1200, Ian Goodacre wrote:
> > Subject: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: boot failure with acpi enabled
...
> If that doesn't fix the bug, please report this upstream at
> <https://bugzilla.ke
October 12 2010, Cyril updated that he believes this problem is fixed in
1.2.2-3. I could see the names of the files he attached but I don't see
how to open them.
March 2011, I see that squeeze and wheezy both have 2.2.2-2 and sid and
experimental have 1.3.99. I don't see any links to a 2.2.2-3 ve
Subject: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: boot failure with acpi enabled
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-15
Severity: normal
Running Debian squeeze, recently updated, on an Acer Aspire 5735Z
laptop.
By default, ACPI is enabled and booting is unreliable. Often (at least
half the
time, maybe more) af
. Otherwise, I did
everything exactly as indicated in the linked page.
This was required so I could install linux-headers-2.6.35-trunk-amd64,
which was required so I could install linux-image-2.6.35-trunk-amd64.
Thanks again - your help is much appreciated.
Regards,
Ian Goodacre
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 2
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.35-1~experimental.1
Severity: normal
I am running squeeze on an Acer Aspire 5735Z, but with
linux-image-2.6.35
-trunk-amd64 from experimental, per Bug#591622. With ACPI enabled, when
I leave
the system idle for a period of time (30 minutes or more) the screen is
dim
The new kernel hasn't completely resolved the problem.
The system reboots reliably if it hasn't gone to sleep,
but after having gone to sleep a subsequent boot fails
with the same behavior as the older kernel exhibited in
all cases.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.d
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.6.3-3
Severity: normal
With every attempt to install today, aptitude gave me:
WARNING: untrusted versions of the following packages will be installed!
More information was provided about the potential harm of installing
untrusted packages, but what I really wanted t
A reference to the LSB specification of the init script is relevant but,
if Debian deviates from LSB in any way then reference to the relevant
Debian policy should also be included and/or the deviations should be
documented in the man page. For example, it appears Debian squeeze uses
insserv rather
8 matches
Mail list logo
