Package: tetex-bin
Version: 2.0.2-26
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch
Hi,
seems to be another overflow in the xpdf library.
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/387583
patch available at the vendor site:
ftp://ftp.foolabs.com/pub/xpdf/xpdf-3.00pl3.patch
Yet I didn't have the time, i
tags 291153 + sid
stop
On 19.01.05 Russell Sutherland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I can't install the gnucash package onto an
> updated unstable system. The error message is as follows:
>
> # apt-get install gnucash
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree...
On 20.01.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> teTeX CVS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
Hallo,
> > Log message:
> > [experimental] splitting patchtargets to the new dsf-patch system
>
> And you wrote:
>
> > Maybe that request is already obsolete due to Franks work on teTeX
> > beta: I'
forwarded 291369 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
stop
On 20.01.05 Paul van Tilburg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> This bugreport is a stub for
> http://www.latex-project.org/cgi-bin/ltxbugs2html?category=LaTeX&responsible=anyone&state=anything&keyword=&pr=tools%2F3755&search=
>
Shorter URL:
http://www.latex-pr
On 04.12.04 Shawn K. Quinn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> Package: linux-wlan-ng-modules-2.4.27-1-k7
> Version: 2.4.27-2+0.2.0+0.2.1pre21-1
>
That package does not exist any more. It has been superseded by
linux-wlan-ng-modules-2.4.27-2-k7 to reflect the abi-change in the
kernel:
linux-wlan-n
On 21.01.05 Paul van Tilburg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 01:28:37PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Hi,
> > Our current policy is not to apply fixes that are not (yet)
> > applied upstream, and to be reluctant to apply upstream fixes to
> > our older versions - we rather wait
On 21.01.05 Martin Fluch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> In the experimental package the *.enc files are missing in
> /usr/share/texmf/dvips/. This makes dvips fail:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/thesis$ dvips thesis
> This is dvips(k) 5.92b Copyright 2002 Radical Eye Software
> (www.radicaleye.com)
On 20.01.05 Margarita Manterola ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> After upgrading tetex-bin, it stopped working. On reinstalling, this is
> what I get:
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ LANG=en_US sudo apt-get install --reinstall tetex-bin
> Reading
On 05.01.05 David Carlisle ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> >On 16.07.04 Ajay Shah ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> >> I would respectfully like to say that from an end-user
> >> perspective, this is a horrible and incompetent bug. I am a geek
>
forwarded 289096 Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
stop
On 23.01.05 Christian Marillat ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Küster) writes:
Hi all,
> > You (Sanjoy) forgot that what you call as "acroread" is probably
> > /usr/bin/acroread by Christian.
> >
> > Christian, it
On 22.01.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Paul van Tilburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> > On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 09:18:09AM +0100, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi all,
> >> For sure. Hmm, the tools bundle belongs to LaTeX, right? So probably
> >> that bug
On 27.01.05 Robert Waldner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> Whilst installing amarok, I encountered the following error:
>
> Unpacking kdelibs-data (from .../kdelibs-data_4%3a3.3.2-1_all.deb) ...
> dpkg: error processing
> /var/cache/apt/archives/kdelibs-data_4%3a3.3.2-1_all.deb (--unpack):
> t
notfound 334613 3.0-10.1
stop
On 25.11.05 Martin-Éric Racine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> pe, 2005-11-25 kello 10:16 +0100, Hilmar Preusse kirjoitti:
Hi,
> > Seems to be a container for every failed installation. You didn't
> > mean eventually #340279?
>
> Could be i
On 28.11.05 Martin-Éric Racine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> ma, 2005-11-28 kello 10:16 +0100, Hilmar Preusse kirjoitti:
> > On 25.11.05 Martin-Éric Racine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > Let's just say that a bug titled "Does not configure (aleph+omega
> > >
On 28.11.05 Martin-Éric Racine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> ma, 2005-11-28 kello 19:22 +0100, Frank Küster kirjoitti:
> > Martin-Éric Racine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Sorry, could you rephrase that?
> >
> > Simply look at
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=pkg&data=tete
On 13.11.05 Sean Finney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 07:13:08PM +0100, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi,
> > For third party software we have a policy. If anybody is willing
> > to maintain the package as a separate one, please open an RfP or
> > ITP bug
On 28.10.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Michael Piefel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Michael,
> > It appears that the purging of tetex should at some point have at least
> > hinted at the existence of tex-common.
>
> Why should it? I think most people would be rather annoyed by
>
On 07.12.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> reopen 332562
> stop
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote:
>
> > Your message dated Wed, 07 Dec 2005 06:32:11 -0800
> > with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > and subject line Bug#335055: fixed in tetex-bin 3.0-11
> > has
On 08.12.05 Blars Blarson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> I had the same problem. My /tmp/tetex.postinst.XX* file attached.
>
1. Thanks for the debug output.
2. What makes you believe, you're seeing the same bug? In his partial
log one reads:
Error: `pdfetex -ini -jobname=latex -progname=lat
On 08.12.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> Hilmars mail was rejected by your spam filter (and marked as spam
> by mine, too - Hilmar do you know why?), here it is again.
>
The IP range of my E-Mail provider was on the black list last year in
August. Actually I can't find out, if t
On 08.12.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 07.12.05 Debian Bug Tracking System ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> >> According to our analysis, the bug occurred because you kept
> >> woody's configu
merge 335225 343104
stop
On 13.12.05 Norbert Preining ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> Dear jadetex maintainers: Your postinst script is very close to work
> with tetex2 and tetex3, but there was small miss:
>
> YOu define the variable
> fmtutil=fmtutil
> and if fmtutil-sys is present, th
On 14.12.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> > Error: `ptex -ini -jobname=amsptex -progname=amsptex amsptex.ini' failed
> >
> [...]
> > (/usr/share/texmf/ptex/plain/base/kinsoku.tex))
> > ! I can't find file `amstex'.
> > l.2 \input amstex
On 15.12.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Moin,
> >>kpsewhich --progname=amsptex --var-value TEXINPUTS.amsptex
> >>
> >>
> > # kpsewhich --progname=amsptex --var-value TEXINPUTS.amsptex
> > .:{/root/.texmf-config,/root/.texmf-var,/root/texmf,/e
On 21.12.05 Jens Seidel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 20.12.05 15:05:45:
> > Jens Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> > > attached you will find an update of the German PO file de.po.
> > >
> > > Note that this is a semi automatic created mail which
On 03.11.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> > On 24.10.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >>Frank K?ster wrote:
> >>>Eddie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> >>>>Please include this file if you report a bug.
> >
On 05.11.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> > On 03.11.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >>Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> >>>On 24.10.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> >>>>fmtutil-sys: running `etex -ini -jo
On 08.11.05 Marcin Owsiany ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 06:21:18PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Hi,
> > So what can we do to further debug this? You could do the
> > following: Save the attached file as /usr/local/sbin/fmtutil and
> > then run the necessary commands to trig
On 09.11.05 Sven Joachim ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> Package: tetex-doc
> Version: 3.0-10
> Severity: serious
>
> The Debian changelog is missing in the /usr/share/doc/tetex-doc
> directory. Please add it there as mandated by section 12.7 of the
> Policy Manual.
>
Hmm, we have a line
On 24.10.05 Elrond ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 04:28:25PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> > 3. Some possible splitting schemes
> >===
> [...]
> > 3.2 tetex-base
> >
> > For tetex-base, the additional splitting-off of a type1-fonts-x11
> > pack
On 27.10.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> >> /usr/bin/pktogf (convert packed font files to generic font files)
> >> /usr/bin/gftopk (and back)
> >
> > This is used by mktexpk!
>
> So we should keep them in -core. I just checked whethe
On 07.11.05 Hilmar Preusse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On 05.11.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> > > On 03.11.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> > >> I forgot to mention that the file tetex.postinst.XXgqP8eU was
> > &
On 08.11.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> clone 334613 -1
> found -1 3.0-10.1
> retitle -1 Should make sure the TEXFONTPATH setting is correct
> severity -1 normal
> submitter -1 Kenward Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> stop
>
I guess you forgot to put [EMAIL PROTECTED] into Bcc. At leas
On 10.11.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> > If the user now refuses to replace the local version by that one
> > from the maint (which is the default) fmtutil now starts creating
> > formats with the ol
On 11.11.05 Eric Valette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> Setting up tex-common (0.10) ...
> debconf: Unable to load Debconf::Element::Dialog.
>
Isn't that a message from debconf?
Further the File Debconf/Element/Dialog.pm does not exist in the
unstable distribution, especially not in the packag
notfound 334613 3.0-10.1
stop
On 11.11.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> clone 334613 -1
> found -1 3.0-10.1
> retitle -1 Should make sure the TEXFONTPATH setting is correct
> severity -1 normal
> submitter -1 Kenward Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> stop
>
--
sigmentation fault
--
On 11.11.05 Norbert Preining ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fre, 11 Nov 2005, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi,
> > > Setting up tex-common (0.10) ...
> > > debconf: Unable to load Debconf::Element::Dialog.
> > >
>
> > Isn't that a message from debconf?
&
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 3.0-10.1
Severity: wishlist
The man page page of TeX still refers to a program called initex,
which has been removed from teTeX (was a only link to /usr/bin/tex
anyway). Please clean up the man page.
H.
--
sigmentation fault
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
On 11.11.05 Junichi Uekawa ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> > About manual, initex feature is there forever so manual doesn't
> > stop to mention initex feature. So this doesn't mean removal of
> > initex is premature. (even right now, if you call tex with the
> > name initex, it behaves as suc
On 20.09.05 Sean Finney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi Sean,
Sorry for late response!
> would you consider including the "clrscode" package in tetex-extra?
> i'm not sure how additional 3rd party latex packages are managed in
> debian, but i think it would make the most sense to have it added
>
On 07.11.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Pierre THIERRY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> > When generating the Postscript, dvips puts the filename of the
> > DVI in the Title:
> >
> > %%Title: foo.dvi
> >
> > It should be possible to have the document's title when it is
> > somew
On 12.11.05 Junichi Uekawa ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi all,
> anyway, the following changes will be applied to Debian whizzytex default
> configuration to work around the problem.
>
> --- whizzytexrc 24 Mar 2005 23:19:26 - 1.4
> +++ whizzytexrc 12 Nov 2005 03:42:20 -
>
On 13.11.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> > I guess a much better idea is to use the interface provide by
> > fmtutil if you need additional formats. In the "Debian TeX
> > policy" (from tex-common)
On 30.08.03 Tim Connors ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> The -e flag means that when rm -f returns 1 in libkpathsea3.postinst
> when it can't rm the directory (because /usr/doc/tetex-lib is a
> direcory, not a symlink, because I have symlinked /usr/share/doc back
> to the old /usr/doc (which I pr
On 14.11.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> > That bug has the tag wontfix. Another simple approach would be to
> > remove the offending code now and then close that bug. The tetex-lib
> > -> libkpathsea t
On 13.12.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 05:02 -0800, Arias Hung wrote:
Hello Arias,
> >> This is a summary of all `failed' messages and warnings:
> >> `pdfetex -ini -jobname=latex -progname=latex -translate-file=cp
On 12.01.06 Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 06:41:47PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Hi *,
> > I was about to create a patch for the package, but I discovered
> > more issues. Most notably, the Makefile in the example directory
> > fails because it cannot find a
On 09.01.06 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> > Thanks for spotting. Patch attached.
>
> It seems it was lost...
>
Next try.
H.
--
sigmentation fault
--- postinst.in.orig2005-12-28 13:17:27.0 +0100
++
On 23.12.05 Martin-Éric Racine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> texte-base installation fails because it needs to execute
> update-language (from tex-common), which is not yet unpacked or
> configured during a fresh install. This in turn breaks installation
> of jadetex and other TeX bits, which
On 18.12.05 Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> When installing a new system (unstable), tasksel, while showing a
> progress bar, fails at the end of downloading packages with the
> following error:
>Can't call method 'description' on an undefined value.
>
> Attached are two screensho
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 2.0.2-30
Severity: normal
Hi,
this is a spin off from #342247. The submitter refused to replace his
hand crafted config files by these from the package, which caused his
upgrade to fail. I've experienced similar problems, upon upgrading
from woody to sarge but didn't b
On 31.12.05 simon raven ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> same bug as in version 3.0-10 or 11, can't remember which version
> this first popped up pasting the /tmp/tetex* file. (forgot to
> enter 'attach file', sorry).
>
This is *not* the same bug.
1. You see completely different error messag
reopen 335477
tags 335477 + patch
stop
On 03.01.06 Jochen Sprickerhof ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> in tetex.postinst line 794 the alternative for oxdvi.bin is
> removed, butt in line 814 it's again created.
>
Thanks for spotting. Patch attached.
H.
--
sigmentation fault
--
To UNSUBSCRI
On 02.01.06 SR, ESC ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Le lun 2006-01-02 a 07:13:28 -0500, Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a dit:
Hi,
> > What do the following commands tell you:
> >
> > - locate mf.pool mp.pool tex.pool pdfetex.pool omega.pool
>
> (note that i ra
On 03.01.06 SR, ESC ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Le mar 2006-01-03 a 12:42:12 -0500, Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a dit:
Hi,
> > That /var/lib/texmf/web2c/mf.pool etc. does not belong to any
> > package. So simply remove/rename the files in question, run
> > mkte
Package: mutt
Version: 1.5.11-5
Followup-For: Bug #277864
Hi,
I believe I see the same bug here. The bug occurs, when I use my IMAP
INBOX.
The error occurs sometimes, when I look for a long time at an E-Mail. Then
I type "i" to get back to the index. The index has changed meanwhile and
mutt tries
On 24.10.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Frank K?ster wrote:
> > Eddie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> >>fmtutil failed. Output has been stored in
> >>/tmp/tetex.postinst.XXKSxUFW
^^^
This filename differs from the name of the file you sent us (if I
assume you
On 25.10.05 Prakash Countcham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> latex fails with the following error on the joined file:
>
> ! Package amsmath Error: Multiple \label's: label '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' will be
> lost.
>
> See the amsmath package documentation for explanation.
> Type H for immediate
On 01.11.05 Bonaccorso Salvatore ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> Installing tex-common give some litle warning ( i don't know if it
> was appropriate to tell this):
>
> Setting up tex-common (0.9) ...
> chgrp: invalid group name `cachegroup'
>
> -- debconf information:
> tex-common/groupnam
On 02.11.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> When a pdf file is produced via latex/dvips/ps2pdf from the following
> document:
>
> \documentclass[12pt,twoside]{scrbook}
> \usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
> \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
> \begin{document}
> Das ist ein Test.
> \end{document}
On 02.11.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 02.11.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> >> it is not possible to search for anything (e.g. the letter a) in
> >> Acrobat Reader. Don't ye
On 19.10.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> > I can't install tetex-bin 2.0.2-31 (from testing) due to the following
> > error:
> >
> > Unpacking tetex-bin (from .../tetex-bin_2.0.2-31_i386.deb) ...
> > dpkg: error processing /var/cache/a
On 02.11.05 Joe Drew ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> tex-common fails to install because it can't chmod an ls-R file.
> /var/lib/texmf exists on my system, but the ls-R file doesn't.
>
> Setting up tex-common (0.9) ...
> chmod: cannot access `/var/lib/texmf/ls-R': No such file or directory
> dp
On 03.11.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> > I can reproduce that bug. But only if I have configured debconf to
> > ask me the low questions too and selecting var at the first question
> > (BTW: Selecting cach
tags 327785 + patch
stop
On 12.09.05 Hilmar Preusse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> just some minor things same to my attention in 0.7. Dunno if they're
> fixed in SVN:
>
> 1. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $ dpkg-deb -c tex-common_0.7_all.deb |grep \.svn
> drwxr-xr-x root/root
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: pfb2t1c2pfb
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Szabo Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-pfb2t1c2pfb/
* License : public doma
On 22.11.05 Christian Hammers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> tetex-bin prevented my package from beeing build by the autobuilders.
>
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=mysql-dfsg-5.0&ver=5.0.16-1&arch=hppa&stamp=1132626014&file=log&as=raw
>
>
> This is a summary of all `failed' mess
On 24.11.05 Martin-Éric Racine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Package: tetex-bin
> Version: 3.0-10.1
> Followup-For: Bug #334613
>
Seems to be a container for every failed installation. You didn't
mean eventually #340279?
> Running fmtutil-sys. This may take some time. ...
> warning: Could not ope
On 26.11.05 Roland Stigge ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> (see the transcript file for additional information)
> Output written on fmfmanps.dvi (40 pages, 115496 bytes).
> Transcript written on fmfmanps.log.
> mpost fmfsamp1; mpost fmfsamp2; mpost fmfsamp3; mpost fmfsamp4;
> This is MetaPost, Ve
On 27.05.05 Dan Damian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi Dan,
> I've noticed diacritics are not allowed, so I attached a new patch
> that escapes them. Unfortunately I don't have enough LaTeX
> knowledge to write some test cases, so it's mostly guesswork...
>
Thanks for your bug report! I've created
severity 310054 wishlist
stop
On 21.05.05 Clytie Siddall ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> Package: tetex-base
> Version: 2.0.2c-8
> Severity: minor
> Tags: l10n, patch
>
> The Vietnamese translation for debconf: tetex-base
>
I guess that bug is rather wishlist.
Regards,
Hilmar
--
sigmentat
severity 310059 wishlist
stop
On 21.05.05 Clytie Siddall ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> Package: tetex-bin
> Version: 2.0.2-30
> Severity: minor
> Tags: l10n, patch
>
> The Vietnamese translation for debconf: tetex-bin
>
I guess that bug is rather wishlist.
Regards,
Hilmar
--
sigmentatio
forwarded 310923
http://www.latex-project.org/cgi-bin/ltxbugs2html?pr=tools%2F3790
stop
On 27.05.05 Dan Damian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> As a follow-up to debiandoc-sgml bug #310885, I'm attaching a patch
> that adds support for Romanian locale to varioref.sty.
>
I've forwarded your rep
On 16.05.05 Florent Rougon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi *,
> > Your package is failing to build in experimental. It
> > seems to be stuck in an endless loop doing this over and
> > over again:
>
> I've tested the following patch to debian/rules.in, in o
On 20.05.05 Florent Rougon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Florent,
> > Next log. Hope it is useful. I've put your debug log into rules and
> > rules.in. The commonstuff_update I've removed only from rules.in. I
> >
On 27.04.05 Carlos Laviola ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On 4/27/05, Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> > [setting save_size on command line]
> >
> [snip]
> > So, is setting the save_size during build is an acceptable solution
> > for you or d
submitter 170773 Max Vasin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
stop
On 26.11.02 Julian Gilbey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi Max,
http://bugs.debian.org/170773
> Package: cweb
> Version: 3.64-3
>
> A reminder to myself
>
> Also, c++lib.w should be included in the package
>
>Julian
>
> - Forw
On 21.12.04 Alexander Buerger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> Package: tetex-base
> Version: 2.0.2c-3
> Severity: normal
>
> Running latex on the following produces an error message "division
> by zero". Putting height= first and angle= second, it works.
>
> \documentclass{article}
> \usepacka
tags 308952 + fixed-upstream
stop
- Forwarded message from Thomas Esser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Thomas Esser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: (fwd) Bug#308952: tetex-extra: please add the astrosym fonts
On 26.11.02 Julian Gilbey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi Julian,
http://bugs.debian.org/170773
> Package: cweb
> Version: 3.64-3
>
> A reminder to myself
>
> Also, c++lib.w should be included in the package
>
Whats the purpose of that file. I guess it has nothing to do with
Emacs modes
On 13.06.05 Marcin Owsiany ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> This seems similar to 310321,
>
Not, it's not.
> but I could not find any error in the log files.
>
Me neither.
> See attached typescript. I also attach all *.log files present in
> /var/lib/texmf/web2c
>
> This is a summary of all
Package: info
Version: 4.7-2.2
Severity: important
Hi,
This is probably another incarnation of #265605 #293337 #308280.
Description:
$ info latex2e
and then browsing to
Commands
then
Modes
and then using backspace to get to the previous page.
Regards,
Hilmar
--
sigmentatio
submitter 314513 Jakob Krainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
tags 314513 + fixed-upstream
stop
On 16.06.05 Debian Bug Tracking System ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian.
> This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your
> message has b
On 17.06.05 Thomas Esser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi Thomas,
> > Further Julian itself got the idea to add the file c++lib.w,
> > which should go into /usr/share/texmf/cweb.
>
> That file exists in the tetex-src area and it could be installed
> from there. I'll pass this to Olaf Weber (web2c m
On 25.04.05 Donald Arseneau ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Donald,
> > Hope it wasn't too bad and everything is fixed actually...
>
> It should be now, but I had to make yet another fix and the
> version is
>
> p
severity 306830 minor
stop
On 28.04.05 Thomas Kappler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi Thomas,
Sorry for the late response.
> Some links from /usr/share/doc/tetex-doc/texmf/index.html to files
>
You speak about /usr/share/doc/texmf/index.html sitting in
tetex-base, right?
> from the tetex-doc pa
On 09.05.05 Eric Domenjoud ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi Eric,
> Actually, this is not completely true. Initially, I didn't plan to
> release this version widely because it was only a minor patch while
> I was working on a completely new version which should avoid the
> need for such patches in t
On 19.05.05 Florent Rougon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Juhapekka Tolvanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> > Setting up tetex-bin (2.0.2-30) ...
> > /root/.bashrc: line 40: /.bash_common.sh: No such file or directory
>
> [...]
>
> IMHO, the bug is in your bash setup that runs .bashrc for every
On 10.11.04 Hilmar Preusse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On 09.11.04 Victor Porton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On 09-Nov-2004 Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi all,
> [Type1-fonts separately]
> >
> > > That bug is now a year old. Meanwhile there exist the package
> >
On 01.02.05 Hans baier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi all,
> I use the pslatex package to print Linux Seminar courseware. This
> is heavily dependent on the correct rendering of backticks.
>
> The backticks are rendered correctly if viewed in xdvi or PDF
> generated by pdflatex, whereas they are
On 23.04.05 Richard Lewis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Carlos Laviola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
> > One of my packages, fpc, depends on teTeX for documentation
> > generation, and it needs save_size to be 1 instead of 5000.
> > Back when fpc only supported i386, this wasn't much of a p
On 26.04.05 Carlos Laviola ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On 4/26/05, Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
[setting save_size on command line]
> > Just for building a package Julians solution sounds better. If he
> > wants to change that value on his system p
Package: libpoppler0
Version: 0.3.1-x
Severity: important
Hi,
there were recently some security issues in xpdf discovered
(CAN-2004-0888, CAN-2004-1125, CAN-2005-0064). According to Frank
Küster as of 21 Mar 2005 your package is vulnerable to CAN-2005-0206.
Please check if your package is still v
On 09.05.05 Thomas Weber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> I've just found this error the hard way. Any chance of getting a
> fix from upstream?
>
I've contacted the author recently. He said that the address we
forwarded to is no longer in use. Maybe that is the reason, why we
never get an answer
On 15.05.05 Kurt Roeckx ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> Your package is failing to build in experimental. It
> seems to be stuck in an endless loop doing this over and
> over again:
> eperl -P -o debian/common.functions debian/common.functions.in
> eperl -P -o debian/rules debian/rules.in
> tes
On 16.05.05 Hilmar Preusse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> I'm filing that bug as important, cause according to
> "apt-cache rdepends libpoppler0"
> no package uses your library and hence nobody is really affected.
>
Of course this is wrong: evince already depe
On 13.05.05 maximilian attems ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> these fonts are usefull for astronomical purpose as they include
> the astronomical symbols.
>
> the license is said to be lppl. no idea if that's good enough for
> inclusion.
>
It is. LPPL >= 1.3 is considered to be free according
clone 309185 -1
reassign -1 tetex-base
retitle -1 tetex-base: FTBFS in experimental: Endless loop on Linux 2.6
stop
On 16.05.05 Florent Rougon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi *,
> > Note that I'm doing this on a 2.6 kernel, which has sub-second
> > timestam
severity 309637 minor
stop
On 18.05.05 Juhapekka Tolvanen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> /root/.bashrc: line 40: /.bash_common.sh: No such file or directory
>
>
> Line 40 in /root/.bashrc looks like this:
>
> . "${HOME}/.bash_common.sh"
>
> And that file really exist. Somehow that environm
forwarded 299889 Thomas Esser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
stop
Hi Thomas,
This bug has been submitted at our BTS at the end of march. We've
escalated it to the LaTeX BTS and Johannes has merged them into the
babel doc. Please consider to update babel upon next teTeX revision.
Regards,
Hilmar
- Fo
1 - 100 of 1824 matches
Mail list logo
