On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 02:08:23PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies files from
> another
> package in /usr. This is so wrong, I'm not even bothered to look up the part
> of policy this violates ;-P
> 0m18.4s ERROR: FAIL: After purging fil
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 11:19:11AM +, Archive Administrator wrote:
> (new) qmail-run_2.0.2.dsc extra mail
> (new) qmail-run_2.0.2.tar.gz extra mail
> (new) qmail-run_2.0.2_all.deb extra mail
> sets up qmail as mail-transfer-agent
[...]
Hi, can you please say something about the status of the q
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 08:28:58AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 24/05/10 at 22:27 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > Re the long term perspectives, Jakub Wilk has contacted Lucas Nussbaum
> > about testing all our packages in unstable and see which are affected
> > by this bug, and then filling b
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:00:39AM +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
> This bug is caused by
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=553026
Thank you for your comments, David.
Regards, Gerrit.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsu
tags 334182 - wontfix
tags 334182 + patch
Thanks to upstream, here's a patch
http://www.mail-archive.com/d...@vger.kernel.org/index.html#00243
Regards, Gerrit.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@l
tags 579543 + upstream patch
quit
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:29:25PM +0900, Jonny wrote:
> the method of making dash crash was found:
> $ command --
> Segmentation fault
Hi Jonny, thanks for the report, I suggested a patch upstream
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.shells.dash/255
Regards,
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 01:43:00PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> retitle 579273 Test suite fails when run as root
> Faheem Mitha wrote:
>
> > * FAIL 24: init notices EPERM
>
> If you follow the link above, you can find a patch for this. Alternatively,
> as a workaround, make sure you are not
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 01:50:43PM +0530, Faheem Mitha wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Apr 2010, Gerrit Pape wrote:
>> I personally don't think running the selftests as non-root is a
>> workaround, but strongly recommended. For every software project,
>> 'make' should run
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 04:07:52AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> I disagree with the conclusion. Why not make it a little easier to
> build git however a person is used to building packages, especially
> “debuild binary” is implemented as shorthand for “fakeroot debian/rules
> binary”.
> I thi
found 573287 0.5.4-12
notfound 573287 0.5.5.1-4
quit
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 07:58:51AM +0100, -=}*/{=- wrote:
> mmm... isn't the echo command an external command?...
>
> whereis echo
> echo: /bin/echo /usr/share/man/man1/echo.1.gz
> /usr/share/man/man3/echo.3ncurses.gz
It's both
$ bash -c 'typ
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 05:29:48PM +0100, Stephane Chazelas wrote:
> 2010-05-04 16:07:25 +0000, Gerrit Pape:
> > On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 04:51:03PM +, Stephane Chazelas wrote:
> > > Hiya,
> > >
> > > $ ash -c '. -- --help'
> > > .
tags 581351 + confirmed pending upstream
quit
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 02:32:18PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> severity 581351 grave
> kthxbye
> Seems like broken IFS handling in read, postfix's post-install script
> does:
>
> test -n "$create" && {
> exec <$daemon_directory/postfix-files |
found 581428 0.5.4-12 0.5.5.1-3
severity 581428 important
quit
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 12:25:44AM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On jeu., 2010-05-13 at 00:07 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > Package: dash
> > Version: 0.5.5.1-4
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: breaks unrelated package
found 581425 0.5.5.1-4
notfound 581425 0.5.5.1-3
tags 581425 + unreproducible
quit
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:38:51PM +0200, Enrico Tassi wrote:
> wait exit status is wrong, it is 145 (signaled with SIGCHLD).
> Downgrading to 0.5.5.1-3 solves the problem. This is a simple
> test that shows the bug
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 10:57:11AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
Hi Sven, Ritesh, thanks for handling all these reports.
Regards, Gerrit.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsu
severity 558989 important
tags 558989 + wontfix
quit
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 12:43:44PM +1030, Ron wrote:
> Dash should not implement -nt at all if it wants to be strict about
> things that aren't POSIX. If it is going to implement non standard
> things from other sources, then it absolutely shou
severity 550399 normal
tags 550399 + wontfix
quit
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 08:33:35PM +, Clint Adams wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 11:57:04PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> > The dash's built-in echo command expands \nnn-style sequences, like
> > this:
> >
> > $ echo 'a\165b'
> > aub
>
Package: lintian
Version: 2.3.3
Hi, to me this looks like false positives. With the current dash and
ash packages in squeeze:
$ lintian /var/cache/apt/archives/dash_0.5.5.1-3_powerpc.deb
W: dash: spelling-error-in-changelog explicitely explicitly
W: dash: missing-debconf-dependency
E: dash: pos
tags 210746 + wontfix
quit
Hi, I'm not interested in adding ipv6 functionality to ipsvd. See
ucspi-tcp-ipv6 for an alternative package with similar functionality
and ipv6 support.
Regards, Gerrit.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubs
found 562945 1.1.2
severity 562945 important
tags 562945 + wontfix
forcemerge 562945 574223
quit
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 02:12:34PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install.
>
> From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
>
> Unpa
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:43:28AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Gerrit Pape writes:
> > Hi, to me this looks like false positives. With the current dash and
> > ash packages in squeeze:
> > The code handling the diversion in these scripts is years old, and I
> >
djbdns services, please note
that daemontools' default directory for services on Debian is
/etc/service/, not /service/.
See http://cr.yp.to/djbdns.html for detailed documentation.
-- Gerrit Pape , Wed, 09 Jan 2008 21:14:00 +
---
Apart from these changes, you should be able to configure an
urged and reinstalled git-core
> and got the symlink.
Thanks, we'll add such a git-core.postinst. Regards, Gerrit.
>From 345a568a90c47f31c882053c72f937aea9efbc60 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gerrit Pape
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 22:47:00 +
Subject: [PATCH] * debian/git-core.postins
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 02:53:42AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> your package FTBFS on amd64 & kfreebsd-* due to testsuite issues:
> | 76 tests executed, 5 failures
>
> Full build logs:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=cvm
>
> (Severity is serious since it's a regression on a
id chroot? I'd like to try to reproduce
in an environment that's as close to the autobuilder's as possible.
Thanks, Gerrit.
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 01:13:30PM +0200, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> tags 569594 + unreproducible
> quit
>
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 04:18:59AM -0500, J
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:04:11AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> > debian-admin, can you please install the build dependencies of git
> > 1:1.7.0.5-1 in zelenka.d.o's sid chroot? I'd like to try to reproduce
> > in an env
tags 569594 - unreproducible help
tags 569594 + pending
quit
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 02:14:15PM +0200, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> Thanks. Unfortunately I still cannot reproduce the autobuild failures,
> dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -B -uc -us runs through just fine. I'll
> prepare a pac
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 03:41:15PM -0700, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> The "ucspi-tcp" created by Gerrit Pape breaks all packages produced from
> "ucspi-tcp-src" created by Jon Marler. It does this in two ways, first it
> uses the "ucspi-tcp" package name that
severity 562945 normal
tags 562945 - moreinfo
quit
No response from the submitter.
On Mon, May 24, 2010, Gerrit Pape wrote:
[...]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
d prepared to act as
> upstream. Is Gerrit Pape willing and able to do that ? Does he have
> the skills and experience necessary for maintaining an MTA package
> written in a somewhat-strange C dialect ? (I haven't looked into this
> question but it seems the one we need to
Hi, Russ summarized my opinion very well.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 01:13:17PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Were this my package, I think what I'd do is offer an init script that
> automatically switches to using runit if git-daemon-run is installed,
> detecting that in some reasonable fashion. I c
On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 03:44:18PM -0500, Samuel Bronson % git-svn fetch
> Incompatible library version: Mismatched FS module version for 'fsfs': found
> 1.5.1, expected 1.5.2 at /usr/bin/git-svn line 1385
Hi Samuel, can you please re-check with the current version in lenny,
sid, or experimental
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 08:01:29PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Gerrit Pape writes ("Re: Bug#422139: Please supply a sysvinit script"):
> > A separate binary package named git-daemon-sysv or so, that conflicts
> > and provides git-daemon-run, is the way I'd do the
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 06:48:56PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 08:34:45AM +0000, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> >
> > A separate binary package named git-daemon-sysv or so, that conflicts
> > and provides git-daemon-run, is the way I'd do the integration.
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi, I'm looking for a new maintainer for the ezmlm-browse package.
There's a new upstream version available.
Description: Web browser for ezmlm-idx archives
This is ezmlm-browse, a web interface for browsing ezmlm-idx (version
0.40 or later) archives. The default
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 05:01:06PM -0800, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> Hello,
>new dash has some serious problems with waiting on spawned
> processes, which completely breaks apt-move - at the end apt-move spawns
> pipe as shown below:
Hi Petr, can you give me some instructions on how to reproduc
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 08:33:39AM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 05:01:06PM -0800, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> > Hello,
> >new dash has some serious problems with waiting on spawned
> > processes, which completely breaks apt-move - at the end apt-mov
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 04:57:34PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Chris Lamb wrote:
> > You marked this bug as "forwarded" but I don't see anything on the mailing
> > list about it; should I just look harder?
>
> Any movement on this?
Hi, I got no response from upstream yet. I applied the patch to
0
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:24:22AM +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> As in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=497469
> I also see junk with e.g.,
> $ git gui blame git-gui/po/zh_cn.po
Hi, this display fine for me with
$ git gui --version
git-gui version 0.12.0
$ git version
git
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 05:31:23PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> It's kind of annoying that it defaults to tk8.4 again because it breaks
> previous gitk configurations using e.g. ttf fonts.
Hi Pierre, AFAICS it doesn't, it uses the tk version that is the default
on your system, see #503113. git
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 04:37:01AM +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> >>>>> "GP" == Gerrit Pape writes:
> GP> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:24:22AM +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> >> As in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=497469
>
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 02:51:17PM -0800, Marc Oscar Singer wrote:
> Even though there is a report here that closes the bug, the package
> isn't available.
It's been available for a very short time, look for git-core-dev in
/usr/share/doc/git-core/changelog.Debian.gz
> Is it likely that we'll se
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 09:53:21PM +0100, Jozef Kutej wrote:
> it's from testing. current stable - lenny is not going to be fixed?
Yes, if the bug is in lenny, it most probably will not be fixed in
lenny.
> second notice is that the git-gui, git-svn and all the "git-* friends"
> are gone now. Thi
$ zcat /usr/share/doc/djbdns/NEWS.Debian.gz |head
djbdns (1:1.05-6) unstable; urgency=medium
CVE-2008-4392 reports 'Rapid DNS Poisoning in dnscache', the dnscache
program included in djbdns-1.05. Upstream's comments on this can be
read in http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/forgery.html
The dbndns pa
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 08:32:20AM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 12:38:11AM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > * For each such criticism, what your opinion of it is and what
> > if anything you plan to do about it.
> (3) How the suggested packages hand
tags 516394 - patch
quit
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 04:20:14PM +0900, Hideki Yamane (Debian-JP) wrote:
> I've found an article about DNS Cache poisoing for dnscache,
> and patch is available at his site, see http://www.your.org/dnscache/
> patches are "freely distributed", so we can apply those.
>
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:01:55AM +0100, Andreas Doescher wrote:
> While upgrading from etch (where djbdns-install was used), daemontools-run
> are not installed automatically, therefore my dns-server did not start after
> reboot.
> After installing daemontools-run, the svscan was able to start
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 11:26:34AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Today I wanted to sign a tag with my key. Unfortunately git claimed it
> wasn't able to find the secret key. I was able to track it down to that
> gpg --list-secret-keys doesn't show the UID it wants to use.
>
> The workaround pro
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 03:50:44PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Gerrit Pape [2009-02-18 15:34:11 CET]:
> > On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 11:26:34AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > > Today I wanted to sign a tag with my key. Unfortunately git claimed it
> > > wasn'
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 04:20:15PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Gerrit Pape [2009-02-18 16:04:57 CET]:
> > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 03:50:44PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > > * Gerrit Pape [2009-02-18 15:34:11 CET]:
> > > > On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 11:26:34
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 09:10:02AM -0800, Marc Oscar Singer wrote:
> Gerrit Pape wrote:
> >On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 02:51:17PM -0800, Marc Oscar Singer wrote:
> >>Even though there is a report here that closes the bug, the package
> >>isn't available.
> >It&
seems to consume
> input from the series files, not from my tty. And after that it enters
> an infinite loop, probably because read fails.
Hi Uwe, does the attached patch fix this for you?
Thanks, Gerrit.
>From 679c4e82bf8eb9a7bb144884629c8b1e781c7ffc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gerrit Pa
uch as providing a
signed package for stable, please let me know.
Regards, Gerrit.
commit 24aaa9dc0b99ebe01b190dc1d97a24d5b4616abd
Author: Gerrit Pape
Date: Mon Feb 23 14:00:16 2009 +
* debian/diff/0006-Install-templates-with-the-user-and-group...diff:
new, cherry-picked fro
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 04:37:29PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> As I understand it, these files are not usually executed directly, but do
> serve as templates for scripts that are executed, so someone could edit their
> content and hope that an administrator copies the script without noticing
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:29:31AM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> After my system update, I discovered that git-gui moved to /usr/lib/git-core.
> All other git commands too.
> I think this major change deserves at least one line in the changelog and a
> notice
> in Debian.news (in the package).
/us
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 01:04:19PM +0100, Stefan Munder wrote:
> Package: cfs
> Version: 1.4.1-20
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> The current version of nfs-common and nfs-kernel-server in testing (squeeze)
> breaks cfs.
> The cfs daemon is not started by /etc/
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 07:28:51PM +, Stefan Munder wrote:
> Gerrit,
> I chose cfs because cfs is broken now. But indeed, I've no idea whether cfs
> or nfs is the reason.
I'm sorry, Stefan, my response wasn't appropriate.
> Shall I submit a new bug report to nfs-{common,kernel-server}?
You
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 06:38:23PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi Gerrit,
>
> Starting from a clean slate, if I install git-daemon-run and run "sv
> down git-daemon", then git-daemon is still running. It seems that the
> sv down command kills git but does not kill the child git-daemon
> proce
Package: linphone-nox
Version: 3.0.0-3
Tags: patch upstream
Hi, linphonec doesn't play the incoming ring sound on powerpc. It's a
bad seek() due to an endian issue, please see the patch below. With the
patch the ring play fine. I'm not sure about data_chunk->len, and
didn't really check since i
Package: linphone-nox
Version: 3.0.0-3
Hi, linphonec seems to leak filedescriptors. After startup
# ls -1 /proc/31654/fd/ |wc -l
8
#
After a first incoming call (unanswered)
# ls -1 /proc/31654/fd/ |wc -l
11
#
After another incoming call (unanswered)
# ls -1 /proc/31654/fd/ |wc -l
14
#
T
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 08:04:33AM +0100, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> Not sure if any of the previous reporters actually read
> http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/forgery.html , but it occurs to me as if this
> problem is a problem in the current DNS protocol that cannot be
> prevented *at all*. However, it can
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 04:37:29PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Gerrit, it would be great if you could provide updated packages for
> stable-security and oldstable-security. Please upload them to
> security-master, and make sure you build with full source ("-sa") at least
> for the stable-sec
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 09:18:24PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Gerrit Pape:
> > The attack under discussion is a bruteforce attack.
>
> No, it's not, it's about 100 times faster than brute force.
We're discussing the birthday attack. A birthday attack is
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 02:35:09PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> $ dash -c 'a=10; echo $((a*2))'
> 20
>
> BUT:
> $ dash -c 'a=10; echo $((a++))'
> dash: arithmetic expression: expecting primary: "a++"
>
> Wartan Hachaturow wrote a patch for FreeBSD's ash some time ago[1]
>
> [1]http://www.fre
> problem.
Recompiling the current version in unstable doesn't work for me.
Hi Herbert, I suggest the attached patch to fix the parsing problem.
Thanks, Gerrit.
>From d5f08fa63ca6c28bbdafa1b57ee782e0e91a6fbb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gerrit Pape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue,
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 01:14:14PM +, Marco Rodrigues wrote:
> As I can see in the latest build log at
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=git-core;ver=1%3A1.5.4.4-1;arch=i386;stamp=1205154556
>
> *** t9600-cvsimport.sh ***
> * skipping cvsimport tests, cvsps not found
> * passed all 0 t
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 12:13:12PM +0200, Eddy Petri??or wrote:
> There are very frequent scenarios when is desirable to limit the status
> command just to a directory or a set of files in the repo.
>
> I would have expected that "git status ." to show me only the status for
> the files under the
It's 'git diff-files' vs 'fakeroot git diff-files'.
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 03:13:42PM +0100, Teemu Ikonen wrote:
> When working directory and index are clean, nothing happens when git-stash
> is run. If ran under fakeroot (in debian/rules for example) on the same tree,
> git-stash makes an empty
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:48:25PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:19:22PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > In a buildd chroot:
> >
> > sh-3.1# cvsps -h
> > Cannot create the cvsps directory '.cvsps': No such file or directory
> >
> > Seems cvsps doesn't really lik
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:26:39AM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> Gerrit Pape wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 12:13:12PM +0200, Eddy Petri??or wrote:
>>> There are very frequent scenarios when is desirable to limit the
>>> status command just to a directory or
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 02:04:12PM +0100, picca wrote:
> Hello I attached my .gitconfig the .git/config of my project and the
> output of a git format-patch --stdout --signoff... f-patches
Hi picca, thanks for the report, I can reproduce it. You need to
specify the imap host in the git config, e.
forcemerge 446027 472197
quit
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 06:16:22PM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
> Please consider moving
>
> doc/git-core/contrib/emacs
>
> to separate package git-core-el, because the upcoming Emacs 23.x will
> have git support built-in vc-git.el
Hi Jari, please see #446027.
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 05:13:58PM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
> TEST SETUP:
>
> 1) run dropbear from xinetd at host A: /etc/xinetd.d/dropbear
> 2) try to upload anything from host B to host A (above), using openssh scp:
Hi Jari, this looks much like #448397. Unfortunately I cannot reproduce
the f
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 08:11:22AM +0900, Matt Johnston wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 05:25:12PM +0000, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 05:13:58PM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
> > > TEST SETUP:
> > >
> > > 1) run dropbear from xinetd at host A:
severity 472771 wishlist
quit
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 09:24:39AM +0100, kaouete wrote:
> There is a lot of patches that could be applied to djbdns to have it be
> better,
> I am interested in the ipv6 one, but there is a lot more that are interesting.
> For examples the ones that add SRV record,
tags 470443 + unreproducible
quit
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 10:19:31AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
>
> Relevant part:
> > ./install
> > install: fatal: unable to write .../bin/tcpserver: access denied
> > make: *** [i
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 12:43:28PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 11/03/08 at 08:54 +0000, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 10:19:31AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> > &
tags 463853 + patch
quit
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 02:45:52PM -0500, Frédéric Brière wrote:
> git-pull expects all git-merge options to come before git-fetch options,
> but the manpage makes no mention of this.
A patch is scheduled for 1.5.4.5
http://git.kernel.org/?p=git/git.git;a=commitdiff;h=5b
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 07:12:04PM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 12:40:10PM +0000, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 11:19:11AM +, Archive Administrator wrote:
> > > (new) qmail-run_2.0.2.dsc extra mail
> > > (new) qmail-run_2.0.2.t
marden.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 08:18:28 +
From: Gerrit Pape
To: Archive Administrator
Cc: 457...@bugs.debian.org, 510...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#510415: qmail-run_2.0.2_powerpc.changes is NEW
References:
<20100524124010.gb17...@smarden.org>
<20100606191204.5663.qm.
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 06:40:20PM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Gerrit Pape (p...@smarden.org):
> > I'm fine with you doing an NMU for the translation changes, just go
> > ahead as you please.
>
> While building the NMU, I found out two (imho easy
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 03:22:36PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > +++ b/debian/git-daemon-sysv.postrm
> > @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> > +#!/bin/sh
> > +set -e
> > +
> > +test "$1" = 'purge' || exit 0
> > +
> > +update-rc.d git-daemon remove >/dev/null
> > +
> > +getent passwd gitl
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 03:15:57PM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> A new NMU has been uploaded to DELAYED/3-day
Thanks a lot, Christian. Regards, Gerrit.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.
See
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/159938
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 08:11:21PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> See my signature. Anyway, I think we should have some common, shared
> code across all shells that are eligible as /bin/sh in Debian, and
> maybe manage /bin/sh as non-diverted non-packaged file, means symbolic
> link. The shells’ m
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 10:21:58AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Dear Debian maintainer,
>
> ("oh no, not him again"...)
;) No problem, I'm happy with and thank you for your contribution to
the package.
> So, sorry for this, but the radar beeped at your package and here am I
> with an NMU i
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 11:02:22PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> A somewhat orthogonal task
> ~~
> IV. Introduce a new package to take responsibility for the /bin/sh symlink.
>
> Preinst (not necessarily in this order):
> 1. Removes all diversions
> 2. Set
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 05:11:48PM -0400, Denis Laxalde wrote:
> Le mercredi 13 octobre 2010, Anders Kaseorg a écrit :
> > This is because giggle and gitstats have a versioned dependency on
> > git-core, and dpkg does not support versioned Provides [1]. So
> > giggle and gitstats will need to hav
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 08:02:36PM +0100, Piotr Engelking wrote:
> The debian/copyright file claims that dietlibc is licensed under GPL
> version 2 or later. According to the README file, it is actually
> licensed under GPL version 2.
>
> Please refer to the correct license in debian/copyright.
T
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 01:36:03AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 11:13 +0000, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> > tags 547902 + patch
> > quit
> >
> > Hi, please see http://bugs.debian.org/547902
> >
> > Here's a patch from Christian Hohnstaed
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 01:13:07PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Package: libmatrixssl1.8-dev
> Version: 1.8.6-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: The listed file appears to be linked against the C library,
> User: lintian-ma...@debian.org
> Usertags: missing-dependency-on-libc
>
> All share
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 12:34:58AM +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> Package: git-core
> Version: 1:1.6.5.2-1
> Severity: important
>
> The most recent git in debian has a broken ignore handling. Let me show
> it on a example:
> > mkdir gittest
> > cd gittest
> > git init
> > touch a
> > git add a
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 03:52:52PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Justification: The package contains a special file (e.g., a device file).
>This is forbidden by current policy. If your program needs this
>device, you should create it by calling makedev from the
>
tags 526418 + moreinfo
quit
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 05:37:50PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> reopen 526418
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> Maybe I didn't make myself clear enough.
>
> vc-git as included in emacs is broken by change in git-core.
Hi Junichi, AFAICS git-blame never had an option -r. To me
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:24:44PM +0200, Tino Keitel wrote:
> a new upstream version was released. Debian packages (i386, amd64,
> source) can be found here:
>
> deb http://tikei.de/debian/ sid main
>
> The Debian packaging source can be found here:
>
> git clone http://tikei.de/git/xca.git
Hi
On more thing: the upstream license pasted into debian/copyright looks
like the default 3-clause BSD license. If that's true, you can simply
refer to /usr/share/common-licenses/BSD, just as done for your packaging
code.
Regards, Gerrit.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@li
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 05:19:41PM +0200, Antonio Ospite wrote:
> in http://bugs.debian.org/535608 I attached a sysv init script for
> git-daemon. Now, I am willing to package it and maintain it, but I am
> not a DD so I'd need some of you to sponsor me. Can this be arranged?
Hi,
concerning the p
Package: ftp.debian.org
See also bug#553263
Please remove the package, upstream and Debian maintainer no longer work
with this software.
Thanks, Gerrit.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.de
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 12:10:33AM +0100, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
> Regarding sh -c optimization, I am in favour of this. Uselessly waiting
> 'sh -c' processes annoy me. I made the change for FreeBSD 8.0 sh, which
> is very similar to dash. The SVN changeset is r194128. The change
> appears to work
e like here. But, the old
> > maintainer being the upstream means you need to at least communicate with
> > him beforehand.
>
> I did reach out to Gerrit Pape (previous maintainer & upstream) of
> course before doing anything. I offered to help and he was happy to hand
>
701 - 800 of 820 matches
Mail list logo
