incredibly helpful.
slurm-llnl is a 25M package, I do not think it's worth it.
Best regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
ackage is
already in the upload queue as you can see from this page:
https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
Any new upload will remain there until Wheezy is out.
Best regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "
Package: mrtg-rrd
Version: 0.7-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
mrtg-rrd should depend on the package rrdtool because it cannot
work without it.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (800, 'testing'), (700, 'stable'), (60
vironmentFile) but indeed I need to check upstream
more regularly.
Thanks again for your help
--
Gennaro Oliva
e.
I have already incorporated the patch in the new source, but I still
need some days to release the new version.
Best regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
lib/i386-linux-gnu/slurm/acct_gather_energy_rapl.so
>
> This is due to a missing build depends on libipmimonitoring-dev.
Thank you very much for this report!
Regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscri
wlm-basic-plugins | grep rrd
>
>
> This is due to a missing build depends on librrd-dev.
Thank you very much for this report!
Best regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Adding the debug option outputs nothing I can find. I haven't straced sshd
> yet.)
Please let me know, if you find out why it is not working or help me to
replicate your situation.
Best regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
Hi Jan,
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 01:48:00AM +0200, Jan Braun wrote:
> Thank you for maintaining munge.
Thank you for reporting and for the patch.
Regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
for your help
--
Gennaro Oliva
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
our will to find a
better solution for the next release.
Best regards,
--
Gennaro Oliva
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tags 850891 + wontfix
Hi Rémi and Karl,
since the discussion about this possible feature is over I'm tagging
this old bug with wontfix.
Thanks for your contribution
--
Gennaro Oliva
. The diffstat is:
changelog |7 +
patches/CVE-2016-10030 | 198 +
patches/series |1
3 files changed, 206 insertions(+)
Thanks
--
Gennaro Oliva
diff -Nru slurm-llnl-14.03.9/debian/changelog
slurm-llnl-14.03.9/debian/chan
nux-gnu/security/libpam_slurm.so
>
> So something in the multi-arch renaming incorrectly moves it to
> libpam_slurm.so.
did you experienced this bug in a more recent version of libpam-slurm?
I was never able to reproduce it.
Best regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
ll required since previous version of the package added user
without specifying "/nonexistent", therefore when updating from those
releases we need to modify this information.
[1] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-opersys.html#s9.2.2
[2]
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-debian-maint-scripts
Best regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
propriate, so I submitted the simpler change first!
I think that a package for the user creation is a bit excessive.
Best regards,
--
Gennaro Oliva
/share/doc/slurm-wlm/README.Debian
please find it attached for your convenience.
I will make the slurmd binary package provide a copy of the
README.Debian in the next release.
Best regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
Configuration Instructions
==
In order to use SLURM you need a prop
Hi Frederik,
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 12:27:40PM +0100, Frederik Himpe wrote:
> I needed to install libswitch-perl to make qstat work.
thanks for pointing this out.
I will include this dependency in the next package release.
Best regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
xt upcoming release of the package.
Best regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
Hi Ryan,
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 02:02:52PM -0800, Ryan Lovett wrote:
> Please pass
> --enable-multiple-slurmd to the first dh_auto_configure line.
multiple slurmd support will be added in the next upcoming release of
the package.
Best regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
so we do not have a
> regression once after the DSA is released?
I'm working on it this week end. It is a major release upgrade. I hope
to release it at the beginning of next week.
Best regards,
--
Gennaro Oliva
diff -Nru slurm-wlm-contrib-22.05.8/debian/changelog
slurm-wlm-contrib-22.05.8/de
Hi Chris,
On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 01:12:03PM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> Could you please take care of it?
Yes.
Regards,
--
Gennaro Oliva
.
Please let me know if I can be of any further help.
I take this opportunity to wish you and to all the security team members
a successful and prosperous new year.
Best regards,
--
Gennaro Oliva
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 06:21:05AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Source: slurm-wlm
> V
Hi Sebastian,
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 10:00:23PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Feasible yes, but with the caveat that mpich is a key package. So if
> there are any issues with the transition, we'll ask for a revert.
sure.
> Gennaro, please go ahead.
thanks!
Best regard
]
[x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog
[x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
[x] attach debdiff against the package in testing
unblock slurm-wlm/22.05.8-4
--
Gennaro Oliva
diff -Nru slurm-wlm-22.05.8/debian/changelog slurm-wlm-22.05.8/debian/changelog
--- slurm-wlm-22.05.8
changes are documented in the d/changelog
[x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
[x] attach debdiff against the package in testing
unblock slurm-wlm-contrib/22.05.8-4
--
Gennaro Oliva
Hi, thanks for your patch it will be included in the next package
release.
--
Gennaro
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 09:19:06PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Hi. Any hope of having this fixed soon? Let me know if I should not
> NMU to get a fix into the archive.
>
> Note that some code is proba
ucf
> is not essential, the postrm cannot rely on it being available during
> purge even with the dependency.
A new packages that fix this bug has been prepared and is about to be
uploaded.
Thank you very much for your feedback.
Best regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
best
place to state that and moreover the simplest solution (install the
mrtg package) is not explained.
Maybe you should consider to write an advice in the Debian.README (the
first file anybody reads when trying to configure a new package) where
you clearly state that you need the mrtg package i
27
> > Errors were encountered while processing:
> > slurm-llnl-slurmdbd
this problem was definitely fixed in version 2.1.11-1squeeze3
that has already been uploaded to testing-proposed-updates.
Check #604207. Thanks for your report.
Best Regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
is that your package already has a function
> named getline(), which now conflicts with glibc's. You need to rename
> your function to something else.
This problem will be fixed in release 2.0.8 that should be available in
a week. I'm waiting for it since it also fix some other warning
ng binary dep blcr-util,
> build-dep libcr-dev and then adding --with-blcr=/usr/lib to the ./configure
> line in debian/rules.
I was already planning to add this feature in the next release.
Thank you
--
Gennaro Oliva
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.0~rc3
Severity: important
Hi,
in a manual page of my package there is this sentence:
The number of microseconds that the slurmctld daemon requires to process
an epilog completion message from the slurmd dameons.
and lintian complain about:
slurm-llnl: spelling-error
Hi Julien,
thank you very much for your parch.
--
Gennaro Oliva
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 04:16:55PM +0100, Julien-externe BLACHE wrote:
> tags 575822 + patch
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> The attached patch adds binary packages for the Perl modules and Torque
> wrappers.
>
&g
The problem of building the package more than once have been fixed,
but I'm not closing the bug till I don't overhaul the package as
suggested. Thanks for your help
--
Gennaro Oliva
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 06:40:17PM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Source: slurm-llnl
> Version: 2.
Thanks for your work, I'm sorry I didn't see the merge request. The
patch looks fine although I haven't tested it yet. Unfortunately there
is not enough time to include this feature in buster. I will add it
right after buster is released.
Best Regards,
--
Gennaro Oliva
rflow.
debdiff attached, diffstat follows:
changelog |7 +
patches/CVE-2019-6438 | 67 ++
patches/series|1
3 files changed, 75 insertions(+)
Thanks
--
Gennaro Oliva
diff -Nru slurm-llnl-16.05.9/debian/changelog
slurm
es
> spuriously blocks package migrations (that used to block hwloc, but a
> rebuild fixed it).
autopkgtest sometimes fails upon mariadb installation:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=977114
Best regards,
--
Gennaro Oliva
eries|3
5 files changed, 248 insertions(+)
debdiff attached
unblock munge/0.5.14-6
[1] https://github.com/dun/munge/commit/0c37cc03b649d8861c2d9e8d172bff736bfd9ea4
--
Gennaro Oliva
diff -Nru munge-0.5.14/debian/changelog munge-0.5.14/debian/changelog
--- munge-0.5.14/d
emerged here:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2020/12/msg00187.html
and patch Britney if it's the case or document how to handle this kind
of situations.
Best regards,
--
Gennaro Oliva
/8577097/log.gz
This doesn't happen for any other architecture:
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=slurm-wlm
Best regards,
--
Gennaro Oliva
. Starting from version 20.02.6-1
the suffix is also purged from the configuration directories.
Best regards,
--
Gennaro Oliva
ct pmix
and doesn't build the corresponding plugin.
I'm fixing this.
Thank you both for your report.
Best regards,
--
Gennaro Oliva
ther package
> libpmix-pmi-dev ? (name?)
> (2) Shipping only one pmi-dev package ?
what about using alternatives? By doing so, every resource manager and
mpi library can install it's own implementation.
Best regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
nux-gnu/libpmi2.so.1
libpmix2: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpmi2.so.1.0.0
What do you think?
Regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
missing-build-dependency-for-dh-addon autotools_dev => autotools-dev
But if I add the autotools-dev dependency to the Build-Depends I get the
following warning:
useless-autoreconf-build-depends autotools-dev
This problem is very similar to #869541
Best regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
l.
thanks for your help. I saw #870829 only after filing this, that's
why I mergerd the bugs.
My apologies for this useless report.
Best regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
etc/systemd/system/slurmd.service.d
man systemd.unit(5) for details.
Best regards,
--
Gennaro Oliva
org/~oliva/slurm-llnl-16.05.9-1+deb9u4/
debdiff attached, diffstat follows:
changelog |6 --
patches/CVE-2019-6438 | 11 ---
2 files changed, 17 deletions(-)
Best regards,
--
Gennaro Oliva
diff -Nru slurm-llnl-16.05.9/debian/changelog
slurm-llnl-16.05.9/debian/change
Hi Andreas,
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 03:23:45PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2019-05-27 11:23, Gennaro Oliva wrote:
> > I have prepared an updated version of the package available here:
> >
> > https://people.debian.org/~oliva/slurm-llnl-16.05.9-1+deb9u4/
>
> I
11 ---
2 files changed, 17 deletions(-)
Regards,
--
Gennaro Oliva
diff -Nru slurm-llnl-16.05.9/debian/changelog
slurm-llnl-16.05.9/debian/changelog
--- slurm-llnl-16.05.9/debian/changelog 2019-05-27 09:48:30.0 +0200
+++ slurm-llnl-16.05.9/debian/changelog 2019-02-12 23:34:26.0
n would make
services fail to start.
Best regards,
--
Gennaro Oliva
hotplug interfaces, but I did not tested it
thoroughly since I want a solution that works out of the box.
Therefore I decided to patch the slurm code that is failing in order to
retry getaddrinfo before giving up starting daemons.
Best regards,
--
Gennaro Oliva
Hi Yuri,
thanks for using the slurm package.
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 01:06:10PM +0200, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
> Dear maintaner, it would be nice to have the new slurm 18 version
> available in Debian.
I'm working on it.
Best regards,
--
Gennaro Oliva
m-llnl will fix it.
Best regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
+, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> Just to note: pmix is already packaged in Debian, but needs to be enabled.
Thanks for pointing this out Alastair.
Best regards,
--
Gennaro Oliva
:
salloc -n 4 mpirun mympiprogram ...
or
sbatch -n 4 mympiprogram.sh
where mympiprogram.sh is something like:
#!/bin/sh
mpirun mympiprogram ...
Notice you don't need to specify the number of processes to mpirun, as
it takes it from SLURM.
[1] https://www.open-mpi.org/faq/?category=slurm
Best regards,
--
Gennaro Oliva
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gennaro Oliva
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, ol...@debian.org
* Package name: python-hostlist
Version : 2.2.1
Upstream Contact: Kent Engström
* URL : https://www.nsc.liu.se/~kent/python-hostlist/
* License
58 matches
Mail list logo
