Package: harden-doc
Version: 3.10
Severity: minor
Hi!
Section G.2 _Chrooting the ssh server_[1] states:
| If you are doing this you should make certain that OpenSSH that uses
| Privilege Separation (which is the default) having the following
| line in the configuration file /etc/ssh/sshd_config:
Package: harden-doc
Version: 3.10
Severity: minor
Hi!
Section G.2.1 _Setup a minimal system (the really easy way)_[1] states:
| you just have to create a chroot as described in the _chroot section
| of the Quick Reference Guide_.
The underlined part is a link that points to (what I think is) th
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 11:23:43PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > There seems to be still a licensing issue, though... :-(
> > According to its debian/copyright[1], mplayer includes a file named
> > mmx.h
> .
> > Where's the permission to redistribute (
Package: libgsm
Severity: normal
Hi!
The debian/copyright file of this package[1] quotes the following
license:
| Copyright 1992, 1993, 1994 by Jutta Degener and Carsten Bormann,
| Technische Universitaet Berlin
|
| Any use of this software is permitted provided that this notice is not
| remove
*must* and always
do change, my friend. -- from _Coming to America_
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgp2UWmQHPdQA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
not sure that my contribution to VTK is creative enough to grant
copyright protection. Anyway, should it be found to be copyrighted,
I hereby release it under the same terms as the rest of VTK, that is
to say:
| Copyright (c) 1993-2003 Ken Martin, Will Schroeder, Bill Lorensen
| Copyright (c) 20
Package: harden-doc
Version: 3.10
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
Section 12.1.12.1 _Are all system users necessary?_[1] lists statically
allocated system users and their intended purpose.
[1] which is in
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/ch12.en.html#s12.1
Among the others, the fo
Package: harden-doc
Version: 3.10
Severity: normal
Hi!
Section 12.1.12.1 _Are all system users necessary?_[1] suggests a
command intended to "easily find users who don't own any files":
cut -f 1 -d : /etc/passwd | \
while read i; do find / -user "$i" | grep -q . && echo "$i"; done
Package: harden-doc
Version: 3.10
Severity: minor
Hi!
Quoting from section 12.1.12.1 _Are all system users necessary?_[1]:
| This group can be used locally to give a set of users access
| to an video device.
I think that this is a typo and should be fixed by the following
substitution:
s/an vi
Package: harden-doc
Version: 3.10
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
Section 12.1.14.5 _I have services using port 1 and 6, what are they
and how can I remove them?_ talks about processes listening on raw
sockets.
It's not really clear to me.
Firstoff, is having such processes listening on raw sockets danger
Package: harden-doc
Version: 3.10
Severity: minor
Hi!
Section 12.1.14 _Question regarding services and open ports_[1] seems
to have a typo in its very title:
s/Question/Questions/
[1] which is in
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/ch12.en.html#s12.1
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 17:45:36 +0100 Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 11:23:43PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > There seems to be still a licensing issue, though... :-(
> > According to its debian/copyright[1], mplayer includes a file named
> > mmx.h, w
Package: ffmpeg
Version: 0.cvs20060823-4
Severity: normal
Quoting from the debian/copyright file[1]:
[1]
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/f/ffmpeg/ffmpeg_0.cvs20060823-4/ffmpeg.copyright
| Copyright (c) 2000-2004 Fabrice Bellard et al.
|
| This library is free software; you
On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 05:31:54 +0100 Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 12:22:54AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 17:45:36 +0100 Diego Biurrun wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 11:23:43PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > [
On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 19:18:31 +0100 Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 05:56:09PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 05:31:54 +0100 Diego Biurrun wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 12:22:54AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> >
reopen 401233 !
thanks
On Sat, 2 Dec 2006 15:50:02 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
> reopen 40123 !
^^^
> thanks
[...]
Let's see if this time I manage to reopen the right bug! :-/
I hope I didn't reopen a very old bug by mistake:
http://bugs.debian.org/40123 gives the
On Sat, 02 Dec 2006 16:35:33 +0100 Frans Pop wrote:
> On Saturday 02 December 2006 15:50, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > The problem is: figuring out where to get the source by looking at
> > the webpage[1] is not made easy. In that page[1] there are links
> > for a great number
On Sat, 02 Dec 2006 19:02:55 +0100 Frans Pop wrote:
> On Saturday 02 December 2006 18:27, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > I'm talking about the published stable version of the manual: it's
> > been the same exact version since June 2005 so far (or am I wrong?).
>
> Yes,
Package: harden-doc
Version: 3.10
Severity: normal
Hi!
Section 12.3.13 _How can I contribute to the Debian security team?_[1]
has two seemingly wrong links for external security audit projects.
The first one is the link for the Linux Kernel Security Audit Project,
pointing to
http://kernel-au
Package: galeon
Version: 1.3.20-1
Followup-For: Bug #333219
Hi!
I retried to load the website (http://www.jobcrawler.it) after some
time (and some security updates, see below and compare with the original
information at the time this bugreport was opened).
Now the bug does not show up anymore.
I
t it.
--
But it is also tradition that times *must* and always
do change, my friend. -- from _Coming to America_
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpK7sQCL4HE9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: harden-doc
Version: 3.10
Severity: minor
Hi!
Section 12.3.15 _Does the Debian Security team check every new
package in Debian?_[1] includes the following sentence:
| there is no automatic (lintian) check to detect malicious new
| packages, since those checks are rather impossible to det
Package: harden-doc
Version: 3.10
Severity: minor
Hi!
Appendix A _The hardening process step by step_[1] includes the
following commands for switching to single user mode and back:
| $ init 1
| ()
| $ init 2
I think that these commands should be issued as root, in order
to actually wo
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgp1oBXposSGK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 11:10:16 -0600 Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 06:11:07PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > IMHO, the way to go is fixing this for Debian and then forwarding
> > the patch to upstream, so that it can be integrated in version 1.8.2
>
&
Package: geomview
Version: 1.8.1-8
Severity: normal
Hi!
The HTML version of the TeXinfo manual fails to display figures:
HTML tags are shown instead (rather than interpreted).
The fact is that the tags that should be there to display
the image are somehow mangled ('<' is substituted by its HTML
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 12:15:42 -0600 Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 06:42:05PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > Package: geomview
> > Version: 1.8.1-8
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > The HTML version of the TeXinfo manua
considering! ;-)
>
> Thank your for the patch!
You're welcome! :)
--
But it is also tradition that times *must* and always
do change, my friend. -- from _Coming to America_
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5C
On Fri, 08 Dec 2006 03:35:57 +0200 Evgeny Stambulchik wrote:
> Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> > No reaction whatsoever from upstream yet?
> > The bug was forwarded on 01 Jul 2006, but still no comment or
> > response seems to have come back...
>
> Well, tough times...
ly even better modification, Geomview could check for the new
name and, in case of failure, check for the old name.
That way you would have back-compatibility, wouldn't you?
--
But it is also tradition that times *must* and always
do change, my friend. -- from _Coming to America_
..
On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 17:39:21 +0100 Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 04 January 2007 17:16, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > But nothing asked me whether the hardware clock was in local time or
> > UTC!
> > It was silently assumed to be UTC, which, BTW, was I what I wanted
> >
On Mon, 1 Jan 2007 04:30:32 + Steve McIntyre wrote:
[...]
> On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 05:32:19PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> >It seems that the `md5sum.txt' file includes a line which claims
> >to report the MD5 checksum of the file itself.
> >The check
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007 00:39:12 + Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 06:46:36PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> >It seems that the new weekly build is not affected by this bug
> >anymore. In other words: the bug seems to be fixed! :)
>
> Excellent, thank
http://frx.netsons.org/progs/scripts/releas-o-meter.html
Try our amazing Releas-o-meter!
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpHJ5Jgn1mCp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:28:35 +0900 Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 09:39:55PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:34:30 -0800 Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> >
> > > Source: maint-guide
> > > Source-Version: 1.2.10
> >
ons.org/progs/scripts/releas-o-meter.html
Try our amazing Releas-o-meter!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgp69kTu30ra5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
s.
This sentence seems to miss a closing parenthesis:
s/mysql/mysql)/
Please reopen the bug (with severity minor).
--
http://frx.netsons.org/progs/scripts/releas-o-meter.html
Try our amazing Releas-o-meter!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr
roprietary/
Right?
Please reopen the bug (with severity minor).
--
http://frx.netsons.org/progs/scripts/releas-o-meter.html
Try our amazing Releas-o-meter!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D F
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 11:19:37 +0900 Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 12:33:22AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > Sorry, but I am not sure to understand what you mean.
> > Are you saying that you are not able to update the online HTML
> > version, but only the
www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/ch10.en.html
Assuming that I am looking at the right place, please reopen the bug.
--
http://frx.netsons.org/progs/scripts/releas-o-meter.html
Try our amazing Releas-o-meter!
..... Francesco Poli .
G
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 21:00:40 +0900 Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 12:22:04PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > This is a bug: if you do not have write access to the appropriate
> > repository, you should point the issue out to someone who is able to
> >
Package: harden-doc
Version: 3.10
Severity: minor
Hi!
Section 12.2.9 _Program X in Debian is vulnerable, what do I do?_[1]
includes a typo:
| The Debian Security Team keeps up to date with these lists, so
| they are may also be aware of the problem.
I think s/are may/may/
[1] which is insid
Package: harden-doc
Version: 3.10
Severity: normal
Hi!
Section 12.2.11.1 _proftpd is vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack_[1]
has a seemingly dead link for proftpd critbugs page, pointing to
http://www.proftpd.org/critbugs.html
that is currently 404ing me.
I think that the link should be
Package: harden-doc
Version: 3.10
Severity: minor
Hi!
Section 12.3 _Questions regarding the Debian security team_[1]
states, in part:
| This information is derived from the Debian Security FAQ. It
| includes the information as of the November 19th
Well, I think that this sentence is not really
On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 01:42:42 +0100 Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 11:42:25PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > Would it be wise if web content were owned by a regular user (say
> > user Ronny Regularuser, username 'ronny') who is
Package: libvtk5
Version: 5.0.2-4
Severity: normal
Hi!
A bugreport submitted to upstream (bugid=4041)[1] addresses the main
issue that I detected and fixed in bug #397186 (see [2]).
The purpose of the first patch ('plot3d.patch') that was submitted to
upstream in bugid=4041 is indeed to fix the r
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 21:17:34 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 11:11:04 -0500 Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
[...]
> > Could you please verify the bug report:
> >
> > http://vtk.org/Bug/bug.php?op=show&bugid=4041
> >
> > And tell me if this is
Package: harden-doc
Version: 3.10
Severity: normal
Hi!
Section 12.3.7 _How is security handled for testing and unstable?_[1]
still states that security is not handled in testing and unstable.
I think that this is becoming more and more outdated, as the
Debian testing security team progresses in m
Package: harden-doc
Version: 3.10
Severity: minor
Hi!
Section 12.3.11 _How can I reach the security team?_[1] includes
a repetition:
| Security information can be sent to can be sent to
| [EMAIL PROTECTED],
This should fixed:
s/can be sent to can be sent to/can be sent to/
Moreover, the same s
Package: debian-installer-manual
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
It's not clear to me how to get the source for the Debian Installation
Guide.
At the Debian Documentation Project page[1], there's a Subversion
command line that will probably checkout the latest development
version (right?). This seems OK.
Package: harden-doc
Version: 3.10
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
Section 12.3.12 _What difference is there between [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and [EMAIL PROTECTED] claims that debian-private
posts are "not archived at the public website".
I think there should be at least a warning about the declassification
decis
reopen 40123 !
thanks
On Sat, 02 Dec 2006 11:05:22 +0100 Frans Pop wrote:
> On Saturday 02 December 2006 00:59, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > It's not clear to me how to get the source for the Debian
> > Installation Guide.
>
> For the Sarge version: apt-get source debia
Package: harden-doc
Version: 3.9
Severity: normal
Hi!
Section 11.4 _Forensic analysis_[1] mentions fenris as a tool "provided
in the Debian distribution", but I was unable to find any package that
includes this tool: the package search web interface currently gives no
results[2].
If the tool is
] http://bugs.debian.org/395961
--
But it is also tradition that times *must* and always
do change, my friend. -- from _Coming to America_
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpaFFrzbSR2k.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: harden-doc
Version: 3.9
Severity: normal
Hi!
Section 12.1.1.1 _Is Debian more secure than other Linux distributions
(such as Red Hat, SuSE...)?_[1] mentions XFree: this should probably
be changed into Xorg to reflect the X11 implementation currently
in unstable and testing (and hopefully
a given grammar: bison
comes to mind).
> Right now there doesn't seem to be a strong opinion in the
> project about that, but I expect it's a discussion that needs to be
> had.
IMO, this discussion desperately needs to be had. I think the right
time to have it is after etch i
_Coming to America_
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpAY1XcwVIyD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
[1], as far
as non-programmatic works and DFSG#2 are concerned.
The discussion about source code of non-programmatic works is
(unfortunately) still to be had.
[1] see the thread that started with
http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2006/10/msg00185.html
--
But it is also tradition that times *
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006 01:20:43 +0100 Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 12:55:45AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 23:59:18 +0100 Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> > > Nope, because you can ship the source code and the o
Package: mplayer
Version: 1.0~rc1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
Hi!
First of all, many thanks for the hard work that was necessary to get
MPlayer into Debian! :-)
There seems to be still a licensing issue, though... :-(
According to its debian/copyright[1], mplayer includes
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 18:19:11 -0800 Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
[...]
> * Apply fix for two-dimensional PLOT3D by Francesco Poli (Closes:
> #397186)
[...]
Thanks for considering and applying my patch! :-)
I think that a description of the changes should be included in
README.debi
Package: harden-doc
Version: 3.10
Severity: normal
Hi!
Section 12.2.2 _I've seen an attack in my system's logs. Is my system
compromised?_[1] states, in part:
| Also, notice that the fact that you see the attacks in the log might
| mean your system is already vulnerable to it
This sentence is n
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 11:11:04 -0500 Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 18:19:11 -0800 Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >> * Apply fix for two-dimensional PLOT3D by Francesco Poli (Closes:
> >>
On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 20:01:23 +0100 Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 07:30:32PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > I've not yet seen the file taken from FFmpeg, so I cannot comment on
> > its copyrightability.
> > Take into account that determining whet
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 23:04:40 +0100 Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 08:28:24PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > Hence, I think the Right Thing(TM) to do is properly documenting
> > where the file `mmx.h' came from (that is to say: FFmpeg) and which
&g
* and always
do change, my friend. -- from _Coming to America_
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpz1DiDeWRLD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 12:58:55 +0100 Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 11:18:12PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > I'm not saying that you should insert a copyright and permission
> > notice *inside* the `mmx.h' file: I'm just suggesting that you
&
holders, so, yes: same amount of upstream work to do (apart
from solving possible technical issues that block the release of a new
version, if there are at all!).
--
Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
......
Package: tvtime
Version: 0.9.15-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.3
The package copyright file states, in part:
src/speedy.*
[...]
**
* Includes 420to422, 422to444 scaling filters from the MPEG2 reference
* implementation. The v12 source code indicates that they were written
* by Cheu
Package: umbrello
Version: 4:3.3.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
Hi!
As its copyright file states, Umbrello includes Cervisia which is released
under the QPL license with no additional permissions and a choice of venue
in Oslo.
As it is now, Cervisia does not comply with the DFS
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2005-02-26
Severity: normal
I cannot retrieve php4 copyright file via web.
Directing my browser to
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/p/php4/php4_4.3.10-8/php4.copyright
takes me to a warning that
"There was no copyright file found in
Package: installation-guide
Version: 20070122
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
Section 1.1 _What is Debian_[1] states, in part:
| Debian is an all-volunteer organization dedicated to developing free
| software and promoting the ideals of the Free Software Foundation.
I'd say that Debian promotes (or shou
Package: installation-guide
Version: 20070122
Severity: minor
Hi!
Section 1.2 _What is GNU/Linux?_[1] states, in part:
| Development of what later became GNU/Linux began in 1984, when the
| _Free Software Foundation_ began development of a free Unix-like
| operating system called GNU.
|
| The G
On Tue, 06 Feb 2007 23:51:44 +0200 Evgeny Stambulchik wrote:
> Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> > Setting the tick label format to something different from "general"
> > may, in some cases, cause the zero tick label to be very close, but
> > not exactly equal to zer
t I could point this project out anyway...
I hope this can help.
--
http://frx.netsons.org/progs/scripts/refresh-pubring.html
Need to refresh your keyring in a piecewise fashion?
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12
ashion?
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpFIxaWtUOQ4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: bootcd
Version: 3.00
Severity: normal
Hi!
The debian/copyright of bootcd currently states[1]:
| This package was built and is maintained by
| Bernd Schumacher Hewlett Packard Consulting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
|
| Copyright:
| Copyright 2001-2005 Bernd Schumacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
your keyring in a piecewise fashion?
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpV12Acy3JpY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: pdfedit
Version: 0.2.5-1
Severity: minor
Hi and thanks for packaging pdfedit! :)
The debian/copyright file[1] states, in part:
| src/xpdf/goo/vms_unix_time.h is Copyright (c) 1982, 1986 Regents of
| the University of California and is licensed under BSD license:
|
|Permission is h
r keyring in a piecewise fashion?
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgp1MlJ6pGyIy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ubring.html
Need to refresh your keyring in a piecewise fashion?
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgppoa1xOZmqF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 08:58:16 +0530 Varun Hiremath wrote:
> On 3/4/07, Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> > Varun, did you see my previous reply to the bug[1] that you've just
> > closed?
>
>
> Hello Franscesco,
>
>I am out of stati
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:01:22 -0700 Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 12:32:54AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > Hi, could you please explain why this bug has been granted an
> > etch-ignore tag?
> > Why is it "not meaningfully an RC bug for etch"?
&
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 17:21:10 -0700 Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 12:49:49AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > > This is effectively a clarical error
>
> > What do you mean by "clarical"? I'm sorry to ask, but I am not an
> > Engl
Package: harden-doc
Version: 3.11
Severity: normal
Hi!
Section 10.1.4 _Security support for the testing branch_[1] states:
| Users willing to take advantage of this support should add the
| following lines to their /etc/apt/sources.list (instead of the
| lines described in Execute a security upd
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 19:53:01 +0100 maximilian attems wrote:
> Quoting Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > I also have a motherboard with Intel 965G integrated graphics (it's
> > an Asus P5B-VM, for the record) and I think that getting
Package: installation-guide
Version: 20070122
Severity: normal
Hi!
Section 6.3.2.1. _Partitioning Your Disks_[1] states:
| If you choose guided partitioning using (encrypted) LVM, the installer
| will also create a separate /boot partition. The other partitions,
| except for the swap partition,
Package: partman-auto-lvm
Version: 18
Severity: normal
Hi!
I'm trying to configure an LVM partitioning in a virgin disk on a brand new
machine.
I'm using the CD labeled as:
Debian GNU/Linux testing "Etch" - Official Snapshot amd64 NETINST
Binary-1 20070218-08:47
that is to say
http://cd
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:17:55 + Sam Morris wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 23:52 +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > One of the difficulties with packaging Aleph One seems to be the
> > lack of DFSG-free game data.
> >
> > I found this se
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 01:04:02 +0100 Frans Pop wrote:
> reassign 411586 partman-lvm
> severity 411586 minor
> thanks
I think you forgot to Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ...
>
> On Tuesday 20 February 2007 00:44, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > I cannot understand what's wrong.
Package: partman-lvm
Version: 50
Severity: important
Hi!
I'm again trying to configure an LVM partitioning in a virgin disk on the
same brand new machine, as described in bug#411586.
I'm using the CD labeled as:
Debian GNU/Linux testing "Etch" - Official Snapshot amd64 NETINST
Binary-1
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 01:51:58 +0100 Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 22 February 2007 01:17, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > I set the severity of this bug to "important" bug, since it has a
> > major effect on the usability of a package, but I strongly believe
> > that et
FSG-free game data is found and packaged for main.
--
http://frx.netsons.org/progs/scripts/refresh-pubring.html
Need to refresh your keyring in a piecewise fashion?
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279
the next upload.
OK.
>
> Thanks
You're welcome. :)
P.S.: Please avoid HTML in e-mail, thanks.
--
http://frx.netsons.org/doc/nanodocs/etch_workstation_install.html
Need to read a Debian etch installation walk-through?
..... Francesco Po
-through?
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpl8KxTxBVA6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: harden-doc
Version: 3.11
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
Section 4.2.1 _Security update of libraries_[1] suggest the following one-liner
to detect programs that need to be restarted in order to benefit from a library
security update:
# lsof | grep | awk '{print $1, $9}' | uniq | sort +0
F
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 01:28:48 +0100 Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 19 March 2007 21:55, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > I see the FSF and GNU links fixed (and that's OK), but I still see
> > the seemingly off-topic link to http://www.li.org/linuxhistory.php .
>
> Thanks fo
ed to read a Debian etch installation walk-through?
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpjZ0sbQGiwo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
shion?
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgp7KAGUUgM5W.pgp
Description: PGP signature
installation walk-through?
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpIXvjxDK2mm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
101 - 200 of 3305 matches
Mail list logo
