Package: kernel
Followup-For: Bug #259042
The problem is evident using the same logitech usb keyboard
on usb port (with/out legacy mode enabled) or using an adapter
for ps/2 port. The problem disappears with a non-logitech ps/2 keyboard.
Of course the whole thing is true only in SMP mode.
-- Syst
Package: sshfs
Version: 1.2-1
Severity: normal
User must use sshfs, not fusermount as explained in the README file.
Please document better for a correct use.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'expe
Package: sshfs
Version: 1.2-1
Severity: important
At least using udev, /dev/fuse is owned by root:root which renders the
fuse group superfluous. Moreover, sshfs does not work as regular user in
that condition. One should expect to use the program as a plain user
instead, but /dev/fuse ownership ne
severity 341491 normal
thanks
Well, things goes well after a udev restart (by reboot). That would need
to be documented probably. Anyway the fuse device is missing when
udev is not used, so probably something needs to be done on that
regards.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Package: man-db
Version: 2.4.3-3
Severity: normal
Shouldn't check before running a pager on unknown files?
ruid=1000, euid=1000
++priv_drop_count = 1
>From the config file /etc/manpath.config:
Mandatory mandir `/usr/man'.
Mandatory mandir `/usr/share/man'.
Mandatory mandir `/usr/X11R6/man'.
M
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 01:27:42PM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>
> The library (libgsasl.* and gsasl.h) are LGPL. The command line tool
> is GPL. The manual is GFDL.
>
> The library used to be licensed under the GPL as well, maybe that's
> the reason there are still some ambiguity.
Maybe a b
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 04:34:35PM +, Khapin wrote:
> Package: smb4k
> Version: 0.6.4-0.0etch1
> Severity: normal
>
> Crashes with those messages:
>
> Smb4KUser: Could not get group name!
Would you please specify your account configuration? Are you using
passwd/group file, kerberos, nis, lda
Package: cupsys
Version: 1.1.23-13
Severity: important
Using the 'Port 631' or 'Port localhost:631' or what else, prevents
cups starting due to a 98 return code. AFAIK it already binds
automatically 0:631 and returns that code as a warning, not an error.
This is an ipv4-only env.
Removing the Por
Package: e00compr
Followup-For: Bug #339020
--- cpl_port.h 2005-09-17 15:56:44.0 +0200
+++ /tmp/cpl_port.h 2005-11-14 16:15:48.0 +0100
@@ -171,9 +171,18 @@
* This should be defined in the Makefile, but if it is not then
* the default is CPL_LSB (Intel ordering, LSB first).
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 01:10:01PM +0100, Bart Samwel wrote:
> Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> >Package: laptop-mode-tools
> >Severity: serious
> >Justification: causes user configuration loss
> >
> >After purging the package, I discovered my syslog ceased to work. I
> >found a dangling symlink
> >
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 08:02:35PM +0100, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> in fact many grass libraries have the same problem:
>
> $ ldd -r /usr/lib/grass/lib/libgrass_*6.0.1.so | grep symbol
> [...]
> undefined symbol: log (/usr/lib/grass/lib/libgrass_cdhc.6.0.1.so)
> undefined symbol: s
Package: kismet
Version: 2005.08.R1-1.2
Severity: grave
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
kismet: Depends: libdps1 (> 4.1.0) but it is not installable
E: Broken packages
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 06:58:24PM +0100, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
> reopen 321664
> thanks for the fish
>
> Hello, Decklin and Francesco. I have noticed your changelog about this
> bug
> during a routine upgrade in my system. I send this mail as a member of the X
> Strike Force.
>
>
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
All libc5 and alt-* gerarchy is gone. Let this package reach his
brothers and sisters.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386
tags 344644 + unreproducible
tags 344644 + moreinfo
thanks
Sorry, but it works perfectly in sid as in sarge here on different boxes.
Would you please specify if you are using a stock kernel or a hand maden
one and configuration just in case? What X environment?
On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 11:42:55AM
On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 04:51:38PM +0100, Djani Buric wrote:
> Package: rox-filer
> Version: 2.3-2
> Severity: important
>
> When I click on the List View icon or when I select Display/List View from
> the popup menu, ROX filer crashes, and all filer windows close.
>
> I don't know if this is imp
tags 335902 upstream
forward [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 06:24:44PM +0200, Fabrice LORRAIN wrote:
> Package: proftpd
> Version: 1.2.10-15sarge1.0.1
> Severity: important
>
>
> Hello,
>
> proftpd doesn't send error code 421 when there is no more session
> allowed (from rfc9
severity 335902 normal
thanks
421 is non mandatory in RFC959. Btw, add your proftpd.conf and a
dumping session to the report to help.
Thanks
Upstream reports:
My guess is that they're encountering their MaxInstance
limit, rather than MaxClient
since that will cause proftpd to simply close the c
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 08:01:15PM +0200, Fabrice LORRAIN wrote:
>
> Correct, MaxInstance=Maxclient=1 in this testbed configuration.
> Our regular ftp server was running with MaxInstance=Maxclient=100.
>
Set maxclient < maxinstance (or remove it at all),
that should cause a nice handling of lim
Package: smb4k
Version: 0.5.2
Severity: grave
Tags: security
See http://smb4k.berlios.de/ and thread already reported to stable secteam.
Fixed in 0.6.4 due in a few.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Ar
Package: base-config
Version: 2.74
Followup-For: Bug #339123
sudo cdebootstrap sid build
P: Retrieving Release.gpg
P: Retrieving Release
P: Parsing Release
P: Retrieving Packages.gz
P: Validating Packages
P: Parsing Packages
P: Retrieving libc6
P: Validating libc6
P: Retrieving libgcc1
P: Valida
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 11:34:17AM +0300, Vladimir Stavrinov wrote:
> Package: proftpd
> Version: 1.2.10-25
> Severity: normal
>
>
> While upgrading from cron job on remote server with no local console
> connected, got the error message:
>
> Setting up proftpd (1.2.10-25) ...
> /var/lib/dpkg/inf
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 12:34:19PM +0300, Vladimir Stavrinov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 09:58:08AM +0100, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
>
> > That's a work around exactly for your case due to a known bug,
>
> What is it? The same error appear some time ago. T
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 02:00:57PM +0300, Vladimir Stavrinov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 11:41:07AM +0100, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
>
>
> > I meant update-inetd, which is used by a few (very few now)
> > net services... BTW, I'm having the temptation t
severity 312216 normal
tags 312216 + moreinfo
thanks
Would you please show your proftpd.conf setup?
How are you using lftp (args and so)? Would you please specify if auth
completes ok or not?
See
http://www.castaglia.org/proftpd/doc/contrib/ProFTPD-mini-HOWTO-Debugging.html
http://www.castaglia
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 10:40:56AM +0200, Alain Degreffe wrote:
> Package: tcl8.4
> Version: 8.4.9-1
> Severity: important
>
> The forking mechanism is broken in all tcl version compiled with.
> threads This is well known for a long time. Upstream Maintainer.
> should fix that but in th
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 04:01:35AM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
> Yes, I'm sorry, but if you need a non-threaded tcl core, you'll have
> to use the tcl8.3 packages, which are still provided for just this
> reason. As Francesco pointed out, some packages require a threaded
> tcl. This is not a bug,
On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 03:05:58AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 04:08:02PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> >> In that case, 280706 is not a bug -- closing.
> >
> > Disagreed:
> >
> > - It's a change in behavior.
> > - It's not documented.
> >
> > Either revert
tags 312849 + wontfix
tags 312849 + sarge
thanks
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 02:02:23PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 04:32:26PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 08:38:56AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> > > Note that this specifies a *storage* quot
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 11:04:00AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> Package: proftpd
> Version: 1.2.10-16
> Severity: serious
> Justification: no longer builds from source
>
> This version of proftpd fails to autobuild on all architectures. Here's one
> of
> the failed build logs:
>
> http://buil
Package: kernel-patch-adamantix
Version: 1.7
Severity: grave
Dear Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-adamantix does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
usef
Package: kernel-patch-adamantix
Version: 1.7
Severity: grave
Dear Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-adamantix does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
usef
Package: kernel-patch-adamantix
Version: 1.7
Severity: grave
Dear Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-adamantix does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
usef
Package: kernel-patch-adamantix
Version: 1.7
Severity: grave
Dear Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-adamantix does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
usef
Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt
Version: 13
Severity: grave
Dear Russell Coker
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt
Version: 13
Severity: grave
Dear Russell Coker
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt
Version: 13
Severity: grave
Dear Russell Coker
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt
Version: 13
Severity: grave
Dear Russell Coker
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt
Version: 13
Severity: grave
Dear Russell Coker
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt
Version: 13
Severity: grave
Dear Russell Coker
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt
Version: 13
Severity: grave
Dear Russell Coker
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt
Version: 13
Severity: grave
Dear Russell Coker
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt
Version: 13
Severity: grave
Dear Russell Coker
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt
Version: 13
Severity: grave
Dear Russell Coker
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt
Version: 13
Severity: grave
Dear Russell Coker
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
Package: kernel-patch-cryptoloop
Version: 2.4.22.0-25.1
Severity: grave
Dear Juergen Strobel (private)
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-cryptoloop does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
Package: kernel-patch-badram
Version: 2.6.5.2-1
Severity: grave
Dear Yann Dirson
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-badram does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
an
Package: kernel-patch-time
Version: 2.4.24-1
Severity: grave
Dear Pawel Wiecek
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-time does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
an up-t
Package: kernel-patch-quota
Version: 2.4.24-1
Severity: grave
Dear Pawel Wiecek
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-quota does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
an up
Package: kernel-patch-psd
Version: 2.4.24-1
Severity: grave
Dear Pawel Wiecek
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-psd does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
an up-to-
Package: kernel-patch-grsecurity2
Version: 2.1.5-1
Severity: grave
Dear Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS)
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-grsecurity2 does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
use
Package: kernel-patch-relayfs
Version: 2.6.9-1
Severity: grave
Dear Yann Dirson
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-relayfs does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
an
Package: kernel-patch-2.4-kgdb
Version: 1.9-1
Severity: grave
Dear Brandt Dusthimer
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-2.4-kgdb does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least wit
Package: kernel-patch-quota
Version: 2.4.24-1
Severity: grave
Dear Pawel Wiecek
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-quota does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
an up
Package: kernel-patch-ttl
Version: 2.4.24-1
Severity: grave
Dear Pawel Wiecek
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-ttl does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
an up-to-
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 11:20:06PM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> Hi Francesco again,
>
> On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 14:20 +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> > If you think this package is anyway useful at least with
> > an up-to-date vanilla kernel and sure that it app
On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 01:47:27AM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 23:32 +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> > About that specific patch, the nice thing is that the nude patch applies
> > nicely to debian kernel source, but kernel-patch fails :-?
>
merge 310863 271031
thanks
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 02:53:50PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Package: sbuild
> Version: 0.35
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> sbuild uses the non-chrooted install of apt, rather than the copy
> installed inside the chroot. I've not investigated why yet.
>
> If apt-li
Would you please have a try. Of course you should set on the DelayEngine
directive.
Thanks. I hope this version would enter sarge.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 05:49:20PM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> Note that the package on my repository was renamed:
> http://www.sukria.net/debian/source/bugzilla_2.16.7-7sarge1_i386.changes
>
> I followed Frankie's advices for making the t-p-u the right way.
>
> For me, the package is ready f
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 08:15:35PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> The question rather is: Why does sbuild not run apt in the chroot? I
> guess the answer is: "Because upstream's (i.e. the one used on the
> official buildds) does not either, and there was no convincing argument
> to change it".
>
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 08:56:26PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> >> However, I am a bit worried that this might break sbuild on hurd-i386,
> >> as networking inside the chroot is AFAIK not known to work reliably on
> >> the Hurd, and users of sbuild have reported trouble with it (though
> >> perhaps
reopen 308313
thanks
Sorry, too soon closed the issue. The problem persists after a good
number of logins. Currently on setting off DelayEngine works.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A possible patch could be the following, but please check against the two
archs which give problem...
--- endian.h.old2005-05-28 18:03:12.157472224 +0200
+++ endian.h2005-05-28 18:06:03.729389328 +0200
@@ -26,15 +26,7 @@
#ifndef _endian_h_
#define _endian_h_
-#if G_BYTE_ORDER == G
I found the same problem on my desktop at work and my laptop.
xmltex wrongly suppose the efmt is available:
cat /etc/texmf/fmt.d/40xmltex.cnf
xmltex tex language.dat&latex xmltex.ini
pdfxmltex pdftex language.dat&pdflatex pdfxmltex.ini
cat /usr/share/texmf/tex/xmltex
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 03:22:07PM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> I found the same problem on my desktop at work and my laptop.
> xmltex wrongly suppose the efmt is available:
>
> cat /etc/texmf/fmt.d/40xmltex.cnf
> xmltex tex language.dat&latex xml
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 08:01:37PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Well, this bug is now merged with 262395, but they seem to be opposite sides
> of the same bugfix; the dependency on efmt is a result of the changes in
> 1.9-9 that were supposed to fix 262395/306595.
>
> I don't really know anythin
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 10:07:45AM -0400, jlivings wrote:
> I recently attempted to install Openmosixview 1.5-7 and encountered the
> same bug Jesús did. Checking on packages.debian.org revealed that
> /usr/bin/openmosixcollector was not installed. I then downloaded the
> soruce package for 1.5-7
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Francesco P. Lovergine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gstat
Version : 2.4.4
Upstream Author : Edzer J. Pebesma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> et al.
* URL : http://www.gstat.org/
* License : GPL
Description : A program f
tags 308578 + upstream
tags 308578 + fixed-upstream
tags 308578 + patch
thanks
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 10:39:49AM +0200, Rainer Schöpf wrote:
> Package: proftpd
> Version: 1.2.10-10
> Severity: important
>
> I maintain a large anonymous ftp server, ftp.dante.de a.k.a.
> dante.ctan.org. We rely on
severity 308861 important
tags 308861 + pending
thanks
Justification: it renders LDAP unusable with TLS, with obviuous security
impact :-(
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 09:35:14PM +0200, Robert Schüler wrote:
>
> Package: proftpd-ldap
> Version: 1.2.10-11
>
> While updating proftpd-ldap to 1.2.10-11
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 05:48:54PM +0200, Heinrich Wendel wrote:
> Package: proftpd-ldap
> Version: 1.2.10-10
> Severity: normal
>
> After upgrading proftp-ldap to 1.2.10-11 from 1.2.10-10 PAM
> authentication isn't working. I get the following in my syslog:
>
> May 15 17:15:37 korinth proftpd:
>
Package: teapop
Version: 0.3.7-3
Severity: wishlist
Some options like '-n' or '-N' could be passed in /etc/default/teapop by
the admin. Please, modify the init script to allow that nicely.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 't
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 03:29:10AM -0700, Rupa Schomaker wrote:
> Package: proftpd-ldap
> Version: 1.2.10-13
> Severity: important
> File: /usr/sbin/proftpd
>
> After dist-upgrade I ge the following:
>
> sudo /etc/init.d/proftpd start
> Starting ProFTPD ftp daemon: /usr/sbin/proftpd: error while
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 08:50:24AM -0700, Rupa Schomaker wrote:
> aha, replaced with prior version and all is well.
>
Previous version of libldap2 I suppose :)
> On 5/19/2005 5:04 AM, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> > On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 03:29:10AM -0700, Rupa
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 10:24:36AM +0200, Rainer Schöpf wrote:
> Thanks for fixing this. I notice that the correction didn't make it into
> sarge (yet).
>
> Should I raise the severity to release-critical? It certainly is for me.
>
> Kind regards,
>Rainer Schöpf
I'm quite confident importa
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 05:26:50PM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
>
> The package source is available on my repository:
>
> deb-src http://www.sukria.net/debian ./
>
> I don't know what is the best thing to do here, as this is an update of
> the 2.16 package (which is in testing) and our sid p
Package: debpool
Version: 0.1.10
Severity: wishlist
It could be useful an email notification to a global configurable address
for every successful upload.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Arch
tags 293079 + upstream
forwarded 293079 AOLSERVER@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
thanks
That's a know upstream issue. You pointed it just in time :)
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.aolserver/
That check could be probably removed, but it's around since 10 years or so.
Awaiting porters decisions...
On Mo
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 08:07:27PM -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
>
> For what it's worth, I recently upgraded my kernel to 2.6.10, and I no
> longer see this problem (screen blank after loading radeonfb with a
> Radeon 9600 -- original report mentioned 9200 SE). I never ran 2.6.9,
> so I can't say
severity 308065 minor
thanks
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 12:28:40PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> Package: sbuild
> Version: 0.35
>
> The file /usr/share/sbuild/README-buildd.chroot.pre-sarge states
> the following:
>
> buildd.chroot
> =
> - a debootstrap script by Ryan Murray, mo
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 05:13:34PM +0200, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> Package: proftpd
> Version: 1.2.10-11
> Followup-For: Bug #237050
>
> As this makes the new version not work anymore this seems to be no
> normal bug than an important one. (I do not know if and how to increase
> the severity of a all
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 12:08:06PM -0500, sean finney wrote:
>
> that would be helpful. also, could you try the latest uploaded version?
> i believe that 4.0.24-2 may fix this problem anyway.
>
Yes, -2 seems ok, on both boxes. Feel free to close the report.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 02:33:30AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.11
> > severity 300367 normal
> Bug#300367: libc5-altdev: /usr/i486-linuxlibc1 not FHS compliant
> Severit
Package: autorespond
Version: 2.0.4-2
Severity: minor
Just look at the man page to understand what's the issue :)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /
Package: dbs
Version: 0.35
Severity: minor
find: warning: you have specified the -maxdepth option after a
non-option argument -type, but options are not positional (-maxdepth
affects tests specified before it as well as those
specified after it). Please specify options before other arguments.
--
reopen 308313
retitle 308313 proftpd: 1.2.10-15 segfaults randomly when DelayEngine is on,
preventing users login
tags 308313 + sarge
tags 308313 + upstream
tags 308313 + fixed-upstream
thanks
This problem is apparently fixed by the patch suggested in
http://bugs.proftpd.org/show_bug.cgi?id=263
tags 315687 sid
thanks
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 12:14:34AM +0200, Michael Bergbauer wrote:
> Package: proftpd
> Version: 1.2.10-17
> Severity: critical
> Justification: root security hole
>
> In the most recent (1.2.10-17) version of proftpd, the permissions used
> by the daemon are somehome mixed
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 12:09:31AM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 12:14:34AM +0200, Michael Bergbauer wrote:
> > Package: proftpd
> > Version: 1.2.10-17
> > Severity: critical
> > Justification: root security hole
>
> > This bug was not reproducable on 1.2.10-16, I had to in
tags 315687 pending
thanks
Ok, Murphy's law in action...
Feel free to use my repos:
http://people.debian.org/debian/sarge/ ./
http://people.debian.org/debian/sid/ ./
ftp-master is moving so no new uploads until again available.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 02:08:45AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> reopen 318572
> thanks
>
> > Ok, should go whenever new libwxgtk2.4 will enter sid...
>
> No, there won't *be* another libwxgtk2.4 package in sid: libwxgtk2.4 is a
> C++ library, which means it must be renamed as part of the ABI tr
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 04:41:36PM +, Eduardo Pérez wrote:
> On 2005-07-20 01:04:37 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > Eduardo Pérez [2005-07-18 15:56 +]:
> > > I just upgraded aolserver4-nspostgres and it doesn't work anymore with
> > > postgresql-7.4 because it's compiled for postgresql-8.0 on
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 07:50:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote:
> Package: proftpd
> Severity: important
>
>
> Hi Francesco,
>
> We encounter a serious problem with proftpd since the -10 version on our
> webhosting platform.
> The -9 version does not have this bug.
> We have machine in Sarge and w
tags 301275 + upstream
forwarded 301275 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 10:09:42PM +0100, Michiel Brandenburg wrote:
> Package: proftpd
> Version: 1.2.10-10
> Severity: important
>
> Hi,
> I have had several machines now ( identical setups ) that have had their
> proftpd
> die
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 07:35:09PM -0600, Georg Lehner wrote:
> Package: aolserver4
> Version: 4.0.10-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
> Hello!
>
> I am using aolserver4 since about two/three years in production, and have been
> very glad you made these great Debian Package.
>
> This weekend I finall
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 10:17:06PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> tags 300145 +patch
> thanks
>
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 12:03:24AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> > sbuild overrides the distribution with 'unstable' by default if nothing
> > else is specified. However, as an end-user tool, sbuild s
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 03:26:32AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 01:57:21AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > The file /usr/share/doc/sbuild/README.Debian says:
> >
> > NOTE: sbuild must be run in the directory that has the
> > chroot-{stable,testing,unstable} symlink or it w
severity 317282 normal
tags 317282 + unreproducible
tags 317282 + moreinfo
thanks
Please, do not presume your problem is a general one without verification.
Of course it installs perfectly in a fresh install on sarge (just
verified to be sure, but it's a quite macroscopic issue to be never
pointe
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 12:41:21AM +0300, Delian Krustev wrote:
> Package: proftpd-doc
> Severity: normal
>
>
> >From doc-base package description:
> __
> Various third-party systems such as 'dwww', 'dhelp' and 'doc-central'
> use this data to provide a catalog of available documentation.
> __
>
severity 318017 seriuos
thanks
Indeed smb4k 0.5.2 FTBS with gcc4 due to the same problem in the kdelibs4-dev
header file.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 409 matches
Mail list logo
