Package: libetpan3
Version: 0.39.1-1
Severity: wishlist
Good morning!
There is version 0.40 available at http://libetpan.sourceforge.net/ .
I'd love to see this in Debian and would be thankful to hear any information
about when this is anticipated.
Thanks
Florian
-- System Information:
D
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65
Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C DF79 A374 B407 1A65
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
does not include libsaslX?
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65
Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C DF79 A374 B407 1A65
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 10:19:47 -0300
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's a relief, it means xfmail in the NMU should be working fine...
Yes, it does work fine. I've installed and testet it.
Thanks.
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann
Hello!
Thanks for the reminder, Florian and thanks for the research, Andrew.
I will upload the new version this weekend.
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED
.
Note, this does not mean the package is backported to oldstable now. I
just changed this line in Debian rules as it may help and it does not
hurt otherwise.
Greetings
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hello!
It is my fault, libnet-dns-perl has to depend on libnet-ip-perl.
Fixed package is on its way. Temporary fix is installing libnet-ip-perl
manually.
I will close "my" bug #333249 with next upload.
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann priva
quot;-nr" are read
correctly in this form.
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65
Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C DF79 A374 B407 1A
t with the change mentioned
above it would have been in etch up to end of August 2006 - so it is not
really new code for etch, just code back from vacation. ;)
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reported to be half-configured by our package system.
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65
Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C DF79 A374
I would love
to change that.
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65
Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C DF79 A374 B407 1A65
control
Description: Binary data
reopen 223928 !
close 223928 0.48-1
thanks
I think it was fixed in time for sarge and three installations using
that version back up my belief.
If someone gets this error with a sarge installation, please give me
a note.
Greetings
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann
running at that machine?
libnet-dns-perl version 0.59-1 just hit unstable. It would be nice to
know if this error happens with 0.59, too.
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian: [EMAIL
side note: Does anyone know wether this bug is still
present in Debian unstable/testing?
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65
Fingerprint
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:13:23 +0200
intrigeri wrote:
> Dominic Hargreaves wrote (01 Apr 2012 16:18:49 GMT) :
> > Probably the best way to enable hardening flags is to switch the
> > package to the minimal dh rules style with a dh compat level of 9,
> > depending on debhelper (>= 9.20120312).
>
e.
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65
Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C DF79 A374 B407 1A65
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
no rescuer appears in time to do an last upload
before the general freeze at latest.
Opinions anyone? Steve?
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 09:38:17 +0200
Florian Hinzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 01:28:27 +0200
> Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Florian Hinzmann wrote:
>
> > Oops, I already uploaded, though to DELAYED-1.
> > Uplo
pect an inmediate upload.
It is? Anyway, I am not easily offended by NMUs and I had a fair
warning.
Best greetings
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key / ID: 1024D
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 01:28:27 +0200
Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Florian Hinzmann wrote:
> Oops, I already uploaded, though to DELAYED-1.
> Upload the day after tomorrow and you can also acknowledge the nMU.
> Sorry, I didn't expect you to be so responsive. These b
Hello!
I will suggest the IPv6 package for now and discuss whether
recommending it might be even better. In light of IPv6 support
being a release goal this might be appropriate.
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmannprivate: f.hinzm...@hamburg.de
g-summary1.13-1 summarize the contents of a syslog
-- debconf information excluded
--
Florian Hinzmann private: f.hinzm...@hamburg.de
Debian: f...@debian.org
PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65
Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E
Hello!
This was fixed in version 0.61. I am going to close this bug
with the pending upload of 0.62-1. Please forgive me for not
uploading this more early.
Regards
Florian Hinzmann
--
Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hello!
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:15:24 +0100
Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> what about this patch?
I am not sure yet. I will investigate more deeply within the
next days. I did contact the author of Net::DNS already.
Regards
Florian
--
Flor
Hello!
Upstream is preparing an update. I will use that solution or coordinate
enhancements if need arises. It should be a matter of days.
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian: [EMAIL
;which dig" and "dig -v" say?
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmannprivate: m...@fhinzmann.de
Debian: f...@debian.org
PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65
Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C DF79 A374 B407 1A65
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Hello!
Please allow another question before I return to this issue
later: Which shell do you use when this problem occurs?
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmannprivate: m...@fhinzmann.de
Debian: f...@debian.org
PGP Key / ID: 1024D
ing time and sorry for not debugging in the first place
> myself.
You are welcome - and no problem at all. Thank you for
debugging it now.
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: m...@fhinzmann.de
Debian: f.
severity 619936 important
thanks
This might hinder me in getting the resulting bugfix
into a point release, but anyway:
The package is usable in most installations, so
the definition of severity "important" is
eminently suited.
Regards
Florian
--
Floria
nerally non-functional in this case. One example of such
Thanks for your input. I will upload a fix for this
soon and try to get that one into a point release.
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: m...@fhinzmann.de
he whole test suite disabled
within debian/rules before as to go easy on our build daemons.
Now with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck I did enable them, but
skip if nocheck was given.
Do we have a policy or best practice on what to do about tests in
general and online tests in particular with resp
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:13:01 +0100
Florian Hinzmann wrote:
> Do we have a policy or best practice on what to do about tests in
> general and online tests in particular with respect to build daemons?
Kind of P.S.:
I assumed the build daemons would both
- have online access and
- use noch
again.
--
Florian Hinzmann private: f.hinzm...@hamburg.de
Debian: f...@debian.org
PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65
Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C DF79 A374 B407 1A65
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dis
iour Lucas reported
nevertheless and will ask him for more information if I
fail.
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmannprivate: f.hinzm...@hamburg.de
Debian: f...@debian.org
PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65
Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C
-------
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmannprivate: f.hinzm...@hamburg.de
Debian: f...@debian.org
PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65
Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C DF79 A374 B407 1A65
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist
would
need some effort which should be put into the underlying socket
modules if at all.
I deem this issue as done, the bug will remain open to document
the impact on etch installations.
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmannprivate: f.hinzm...@hamburg.de
tags 366793 -unreproducible
tags 364922 +moreinfo
retitle 364922 Can't use string ("Net::DNS::RR::MX") while "strict refs" in use
(duplicate of 366793)
merge 366793 364922
thanks
Hello!
This bug is the same as 366793 and will be dealt with there.
Regards
Floria
Hello!
I have prepared an upload of the new upstream version. I will
continue working on the randomisation and make an upload tomorrow.
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: f.hinzm...@hamburg.de
Debian: f
.
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: f.hinzm...@hamburg.de
Debian: f...@debian.org
PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65
Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C DF79 A374 B407 1A65
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
after lenny by error. I am sorry.
> can you please hijack libnet-dns-perl and get this resolved?
I considered joining it anyway. If someone wants to work on this
within the next days, feel free to beat me.
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann privat
This message did not make it to the bug tracking system. Trying
again.
--Florian Hinzmann
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:47:23 +0100
From: Florian Hinzmann
To: 598...@bugs.debian.org, Debian mdadm maintainers
Subject: Want to make output of informational message depend on
41 matches
Mail list logo
