Bug#727708: init system other points, and conclusion

Hello. I'm writing to you to request to do not use no systemd, nor upstart. I can guess that you have very important reasons to discuss this possibilities, but… IMHO, "systemd" doesn't even fit to UNIX philosophy [1]. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix_philosophy Sorry if I'm wrong. "upst

Bug#727708: The tech ctte isn't considering OpenRC at all

Hello. On 01/19/2014 01:11 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 16:19:45 +0100, Josselin Mouette : >> Oh, really? >> Then can you explain why >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=391945 >> has not been marked as fixed? > > It is the view of the upstream maintainers that the corne

Bug#727708: Bits from linux.conf.au

Hello. On 01/13/2014 03:57 PM, Алексей Шилин wrote: > In his talk [2] at 13:50 Marc briefly touched the init system choice > question. Perhaps it's worth taking > into account. > > [2] > http://mirror.linux.org.au/linux.conf.au/2014/Wednesday/71-Live_upgrading_many_thousands_of_servers_from_an_

Bug#727708: Bits from linux.conf.au

Hello. On 01/14/2014 10:32 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: > Sergey B Kirpichev writes ("Re: Bug#727708: Bits from linux.conf.au"): >> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 06:05:47PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: >>> I would expect the community for that init system to do the work. So >>> the burden on maintainers ought t

Bug#770731: ITP: symlookup -- Utility for object symbol search in installed libraries

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Dmitry Yu Okunev * Package name: symlookup Version : 0.5.2 Upstream Author : Andrew A Savchenko * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/symbol-lookup/ * License : GPL-3 Programming Lang: C (gnu99) Description

Bug#775436: ITP: xlennart -- An XBill fork but with Lennart and SystenD instead of Bill and Wingdows

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Dmitry Yu Okunev * Package name: xlennart Version : 1.1 Upstream Author : Gethyn Thomas Quail * URL : https://github.com/xaionaro/xlennart * License : GPL-2 Programming Lang: C Description : An XBill fork but

Bug#775436: ITP: xlennart -- An XBill fork but with Lennart and SystenD instead of Bill and Wingdows

Hello. On 01/15/2015 08:26 PM, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote: > * URL : https://github.com/xaionaro/xlennart Sorry. Pasted a wrong URL. The real URL is: https://github.com/Xylemon/xlennart Best regards, Dmitry. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#775436: ITP: xlennart -- An XBill fork but with Lennart and SystenD instead of Bill and Wingdows

Hello. On 01/15/2015 11:04 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 20:26 +0300, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote: >> Description : An XBill fork but with Lennart and SystenD instead of >> Bill > > Please, give it a rest. This isn't funny or clever. What do yo

Bug#775436: ITP: xlennart -- An XBill fork but with Lennart and SystenD instead of Bill and Wingdows

ing of XBill and forbidding of XLennart making double standards. Forbid both or permit both. Moreover I don't see any offense or problem if somebody will create game XDmitryYuOkunev (Dmitry Yu Okunev is my name). And what does Debian constitution says? It forbids such packages? > It'

Bug#775436: ITP: xlennart -- An XBill fork but with Lennart and SystenD instead of Bill and Wingdows

Hello. Is it really necessary to discuss this on debian-devel@? IMHO, it's local issue, yet… And also please sorry for my English skills. On 01/16/2015 03:48 PM, Ben Armstrong wrote: > On 16/01/15 08:15 AM, Stephan Seitz wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 07:32:41AM +1100, Riley Baird wrote: >>> (

Bug#775436: ITP: xlennart -- An XBill fork but with Lennart and SystenD instead of Bill and Wingdows

On 01/16/2015 06:34 PM, Markus Koschany wrote: > [...] > On 16.01.2015 14:48, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote: >>> I'd also object on the technical grounds that we already have xbill and >>> the changes in xlennart don't truly justify a fork. >> >> This could b

Bug#775436: ITP: xlennart -- An XBill fork but with Lennart and SystenD instead of Bill and Wingdows

On 01/16/2015 08:05 PM, Ben Armstrong wrote: > On 16/01/15 12:17 PM, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote: >> I see. By the way, it's _not my_ changes. I'm just a Debian user that >> tries to get more experience of Debian packaging. I found the project >> ("xlennart") a

Bug#765070: [PKG-OpenRC-Debian] Fwd: Re: Bug#765070: openrc: [kfreebsd] segfault in loopsolver

On 10/18/2014 06:01 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > Dmitry: > > I believe Steven reproduced it with kFreeBSD 9.0. Sorry for my total idiocy, but what should I do to repeat the bug? Debian/kFreeBSD 7.6.0 [1] uses FreeBSD kernel of version 9.0 already: # uname -a GNU/kFreeBSD debian 9.0-2-amd64 #0

Bug#812366: linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64: Kernel panic due to reading /sys/block/bcache?/bcache/writeback_rate_debug (bch_cached_dev_show)

Package: src:linux Version: 3.16.7-ckt20-1+deb8u1 Severity: normal Tags: upstream Hello. I experienced a bug in module "bcache" of linux kernel (a reduced photo is attached, a less reduced photo you can download from [1]). [1] https://devel.mephi.ru/dyokunev/public/raw/master/debian/bugreport/

Bug#620511: ipt-netflow: changing back from ITP to RFP

Hello. On 05/27/2013 05:24 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > This is an automatic email to change the status of ipt-netflow back from ITP > (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen > any activity during the last 12 months. I've prepared the packages [1, 2] and I'm