Bug#346443: ITP: cue2toc -- converts CUE files to cdrdao's TOC format

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Asheesh Laroia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: cue2toc Version : 0.4 Upstream Author : Matthias Czapla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://cue2toc.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Description :

Bug#346528: ITP: gnome-clipboard-daemon -- keeps the content of your X clipboard in memory so the clipboard won't get lost even after you close the application you copied from

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Asheesh Laroia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Debbugs-CC: Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; * Package name: gnome-clipboard-daemon Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : Hongli Lai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http:/

Bug#347241: remove cue2toc from cdrdao

Package: cdrdao Version: 1:1.1.9-3 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 12.5 I pinged you on #debian-devel about this last night, but I disappeared quickly into the night. Here's the run-down: * /usr/bin/cue2toc and its man page appear in the cdrdao package. * They also both appear in my cue2

Bug#310876: mdf2iso already packaged in Ubuntu Universe

A few months back, I filed the ITP Bug#310876 . Just as I'm finally uploading this to mentors.debian.net and about to look for a sponsor, I discovered that Lukas Fittl had packaged this in Ubuntu Universe. Lukas, do you plan to upload it to Debian, too? If not,

Bug#291694: Who's going to package bloat?

I was about to upload this to mentors.debian.net, but I remembered that Mohammed took my bug a few months back. May I take it back? Also, it seems David was the one who actually gave it to Mohammed. For what it's worth, I've been in contact with Sam Hocevar who has been working with upstream

Bug#289168: Waiting for Xvidcap

I really would like to use this program, and it's even packaged. Why has it lingered on http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html for a year now? As a Debian user, I'd like to say it would be great if it were uploaded. I would like to use xvidcap to make video-based Debian documentation to help m

Bug#319190: (no subject)

Subject: xserver-xorg: Matrox driver doesn't have Xvideo for Millennium II; patch available Package: xserver-xorg Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-3 Severity: normal Tags: patch *** Please type your report below this line *** There is a patch for the mga driver to support XVideo extension on Matrox Millen

Bug#319190: (no subject)

On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Julien Cristau wrote: On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 15:08:00 +0200, Asheesh Laroia wrote: http://paulproteus.acm.jhu.edu/mga-x/ $ host paulproteus.acm.jhu.edu ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached Your name servers don't seem to work, could you please fix

Bug#319314: New upstream version available

Package: kmymoney2 Version: 0.7.2-1 The upstream developers have released new versions since this package was last updated. I'm having a lot of trouble with my kmymoney2 setup, and I think it's partly to do with things fixed in the current 0.7.4 release. http://kent.dl.sourceforge.net/source

Bug#319314: New upstream version available

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Mark Purcell wrote: On Thursday 21 July 2005 15:55, Asheesh Laroia wrote: Package: kmymoney2 Version: 0.7.2-1 The upstream developers have released new versions since this package was last updated. I'm having a lot of trouble with my kmymoney2 setup, and I think

Bug#317934: MySQL server package contains generally useful program "replace"

Package: mysql-server-4.1 Version: 4.1.11a-4 The mysql-server and mysql-server-4.1 packages both contain a program /usr/bin/replace. The program is a simple program I want to recommend to friends new to GNU/Linux who don't want to learn sed scripting just to do text replacement. So, I sugge

Bug#316189: lomount will be included in Xen from now on

According to http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-changelog/2005-07/msg00172.html , Xen will bundle "lomount" in their releases. So this program should not be packaged from the www.dad-answers.com; instead, it should be taken from the Xen source tree where it's going to be updated. I

Bug#310876: (no subject)

retitle 310876 ITP: mdf2iso -- Converts Alcohol 120% bin images to standard ISO-9660 format owner 310876 [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks -- Asheesh. -- The smallest worm will turn being trodden on. -- William Shakespeare, "Henry VI" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Bug#405547: alpine: Please package for testing

On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, David Liontooth wrote: Package: alpine Version: 0.81+dfsg-1 Severity: wishlist The http://packages.qa.debian.org/a/alpine.html says, "This package is no longer part of any Debian distribution." Surely that is incorrect? When is it moving into testing? As I understand thi

Bug#405762: Maildir support

Joey Hess filed a bug in the Debian package (*) about Alpine lacking support for the Maildir mail storage format. Apparently the pine source package that Debian ships comes with a patch for Maildir support. Do you guys (washington.edu) plan to add Maildir support to Alpine? If not, has anyon

Bug#405762: [Alpine-alpha] Maildir support

On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Mark Crispin wrote: On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Asheesh Laroia wrote: Sadly, the maildir church claims that I don't do maildir out of some evil intent. Here are the facts: I do not know how to make a maildir driver that works well, which I define as: . complete compl

Bug#401001: ITP: alpine -- Friendly text-based email client, designed for novices but also with expert features

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Asheesh Laroia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: alpine Version : 0.8 Upstream Author : Jeff Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.washington.edu/alpine/ * License : Apache License 2.0

Bug#287099: README.hotsmtpd isn't in 0.8.2, oops

README.hotmstpd isn't found by the old patch in 0.8.2, actually, and dh_installdocs gets upset. So I simply 'touch README.hotsmtpd' in the top-level directory. After that, things go fine. -- Asheesh. -- You'd better smile when they watch you, smile like you're in control. -- Sm

Bug#287099: Hotwayd chews up gobs of CPU; I have packaged new upstream release

I am running hotwayd through inetd.conf. Unfortunately, hotwayd chews up gobs of CPU and never seems to die even when connections are closed. The debian patch against 0.8 applies with no problems to the 0.8.2 release from upstream. So locally, I added a two-line changelog entry and did dpkg-buil

Bug#409504: alpine: please do not conflicts: against nano

X-Debbugs-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks Fabian for the bug report. I intend to apply this patch unless either of the two CC:d maintainers of nano object. Also, I'm curious - what would you maintainers of nano think if I renamed the alpine-pico binary package to just "pico"?

Bug#409504: alpine: please do not conflicts: against nano

X-Debbugs-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Debbugs-CC: Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Sat, 10 Feb 2007, Jordi Mallach wrote: I think diverting is probably not the correct solution to this problem. We should use alternatives for the pico binary, with alpine providing a higher priority than nano's.

Bug#410302: Debian Bug#410302: Alpine man page describes nonexistent option

The man page describes an option "-create_lu". But alpine -help doesn't mention it: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $ alpine -help 2>&1 | grep create_lu [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $ Furthermore, doing: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/alpine-0.82+dfsg $ grep -r create_lu . provides no results fr

Bug#410300: alpine: addressbook sort-order cannot be changed

On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Martin Ziegler wrote: The line "addrbook-sort-rule=nickname" in .pinerc hass no effect. The addressbook will still sorted by the default "fullname-with-lists-last". Martin, can you double-check for me if this is still the case with Alpine 0.82? If so, I'll push it upstrea

Bug#410300: Debian Bug#410300: alpine: addressbook sort-order cannot be changed

A Debian user reported this problem with Alpine 0.81 and that it persists in Alpine 0.82: The line "addrbook-sort-rule=nickname" in .pinerc hass no effect. The addressbook will still sorted by the default "fullname-with-lists-last". Let me know if there's any more info I can provide. The Deb

Bug#405689: alpine: patch for debian/rules to build withour debug

On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, Henrik Andreasson wrote: See attached patch for debian/rules Thanks, I'll put that into -4! -- Asheesh. -- Be cautious in your daily affairs. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#410976: [Alpine-alpha] Saving passwords in Debian alpine

On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Steve Hubert wrote: PASSFILE stores the password in an insecure way in a file. If anybody can read that file they can get the password. So PASSFILE doesn't seem like a very good idea except in very special circumstances. But if PASSFILE is mode 0600 then it's not actually

Bug#410976: [Alpine-alpha] Re: Saving passwords ....

On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Mark Crispin wrote: Personally, I'm surprised that the Debian folks are so pro-passfile; I would have thought them to be the sort that would turn off passfile if we had it turned on by default. However, you never know... For the record, it was a user who requested it; I

Bug#410300: [Alpine-alpha] Debian Bug#410300: alpine: addressbook sort-order cannot be changed

On Sun, 11 Feb 2007, Asheesh Laroia wrote: A Debian user reported this problem with Alpine 0.81 and that it persists in Alpine 0.82: The line "addrbook-sort-rule=nickname" in .pinerc hass no effect. The addressbook will still sorted by the default "fullname-with-lists-last&q

Bug#405762: no maildir support

X-Debbugs-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Eduardo, I see that you have an Alpine Maildir patch at http://staff.washington.edu/chappa/alpine/info/maildir.html . Do you have any comment as to if it's suitable to include it into the Debian Alpine package? It seems that the washington.edu have reasons of

Bug#411037: alpine: inconsistent addressbook corrupts memory

On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Martin Ziegler wrote: Start writing a letter to "group". This will result either in To : member@"z@@@" Martin, if you use the Alpine 0.83 test package I have uploaded to http://paulproteus.acm.jhu.edu/tmp/alpine_0.83+dfsg-1_i386.deb , doe

Bug#405762: no maildir support

On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, Eduardo Chappa wrote: *** Asheesh Laroia ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote today: :) Eduardo, I see that you have an Alpine Maildir patch at :) http://staff.washington.edu/chappa/alpine/info/maildir.html . Do you :) have any comment as to if it's suitable to include it int

Bug#416203: doc-debian: "kernel runlevel" used in FAQ

Package: doc-debian Version: 3.1.4 Severity: normal At http://www.debian.org/doc/FAQ/ch-pkgtools.en.html , you use the phrase "kernel runlevel". As far as I know, runlevels are a property of init rather than of the kernel. If this is incorrect, please let me know and close this, and sorry for t

Bug#405698: pilot has become huge

The maintainer of the pine package in Debian left a note in the Debian bug tracker about the Alpine package's version of pilot: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=405698 Basically, it seems to have gotten to be a fairly huge binary for no particular reason. The list of libraries

Bug#405689: alpine: unwanted .pine-debug* files in home directory

On Sun, 11 Mar 2007, Branden J. Moore wrote: Please configure alpine so that debugging can be enabled from the commandline. The patch from Henrik completely disables the ability to do debugging with alpine. Setting --with-debug-level=0 will accomplish the goal of not creating .pine-debug fi

Bug#405762: no maildir support

On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, Eduardo Chappa wrote: * I do not know if Debian would force me to distribute my patch under a specific license. I myself do not care what people do with the patch as long as they don't claim ownership. I am happy to provide support for it. I just don't want it to be

Bug#405698: [Alpine-alpha] pilot has become huge

On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Mark Crispin wrote: I'm not the Pilot maintainer, but is 460,936 bytes really worth worrying about in this day and age? Assuming US $1/GB (which is probably high these days), we are talking about $0.0004 in disk cost. That doesn't seem to be worth it. Across thousands

Bug#414266: alpine: doesn't sent mail

X-Debbugs-CC: Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Santiago, There is this bug about Alpine not sending mail by default. Since not all systems will have a working MTA on localhost, what do you think would be a reasonable thing to do about it? Thanks for all your help with the Alpine package!

Bug#405698: [Alpine-alpha] pilot has become huge

On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Mark Crispin wrote: I'm not the Pilot maintainer, but is 460,936 bytes really worth worrying about in this day and age? Assuming US $1/GB (which is probably high these days), we are talking about $0.0004 in disk cost. That doesn't seem to be worth it. Could I get the o

Bug#409504: alpine: please do not conflicts: against nano

X-Debbugs-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sat, 10 Feb 2007, Steve Langasek wrote: I personally don't find the suggested use of a dpkg diversion here very satisfying. I wonder if it would be better to make /usr/bin/pico an alternative. As on update on this bug: As I understand th

Bug#414266: alpine: doesn't sent mail

On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Santiago Vila wrote: Does mutt not have the same "problem"? If yes, I would call this a feature, not a bug. I use pine because it was installed in the main mail server in my University, and the people who installed it are the same people who made the MTA to work. Just bec

Bug#405547: alpine: Please package for testing

On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, David Liontooth wrote: Package: alpine Version: 0.81+dfsg-1 Severity: wishlist The http://packages.qa.debian.org/a/alpine.html says, "This package is no longer part of any Debian distribution." Surely that is incorrect? When is it moving into testing? Now that page says

Bug#414314: alpine: please include iso-8859-2 in the default posting-character-set

alpine-alpha readers: Jump straight to the (*) footnote if you want to skip the chatter related to http://bugs.debian.org/414314 . On Sun, 11 Mar 2007, Piotr Engelking wrote: Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I don't understand this request. Why iso-8859-2 and not iso-8859-3, iso-8859-

Bug#415169: nano: use alternatives system for "pico" so alpine-pico can stop conflicting

Package: nano Version: 2.0.2-1 Severity: normal As discussed on Bug #409504, it would be nice to have pico stop conflicting with alpine-pico. You need to configure nano to use alternatives for the 'pico' symlink before I (the alpine-pico maintainer) can do that. Since alpine-pico provides the

Bug#415191: alpine: Spurious SYNTAX-ERROR in To Field

On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Martin Ziegler wrote: Package: alpine Version: 0.83+dfsg-2 Severity: minor *** Please type your report below this line *** Right after the start of pine press "C" to start the composer. Type any address in the To field and press Cursor-down. This provokes the error-message

Bug#408915: gstm: Have a "restart" option in the dock

Package: gstm Version: 1.2-4 Severity: normal Tags: patch Subject: gstm: Have a "restart" option in the dock Package: gstm Version: 1.2-4 Severity: normal Tags: patch On my laptop, I use gstm and dynamic port forwarding to create secure channels on untrusted wifi networks. I roam between netw

Bug#405350: alpine: implicit pointer conversions

On Tue, 2 Jan 2007, dann frazier wrote: Package: alpine Version: 0.81+dfsg-1 Severity: important Our automated buildd log filter[1] detected a problem that will cause your package to segfault on architectures where the size of a pointer is greater than the size of an integer, such as ia64 and a

Bug#415169: nano: use alternatives system for "pico" so alpine-pico can stop conflicting

On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Asheesh Laroia wrote: As discussed on Bug #409504, it would be nice to have pico stop conflicting with alpine-pico. You need to configure nano to use alternatives for the 'pico' symlink before I (the alpine-pico maintainer) can do that. Since alpine-pico provide

Bug#394026: thunderbird: Rename Icedove to Coldturkey

Package: thunderbird Version: 1.5.0.7-3 Severity: minor The "Icedove" name is cute, but I think Coldturkey would be a better package name. I think it makes the point that we are going "cold turkey" from Mozilla's trademarks. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers

Bug#724355: patch

Hi Eric! Thanks for this. If you want to NMU upload it, that'd be OK by me. Otherwise I plan to get to this on Friday. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#744097: stdeb: pypi-install broken due to python.org URL change

Package: python-stdeb Version: 0.6.0+20100620-2 Severity: grave File: stdeb Currently, due to a website reorganization within python.org, the find_tar_gz() function crashes with: File "/usr/lib/python2.7/xmlrpclib.py", line 1312, in single_request response.msg, xmlrpclib.ProtocolError: https:/

Bug#692870: alpine: Wrong weekday if _PREFDATETIME_ is used in reply

On Sat, 10 Nov 2012, Martin Ziegler wrote: Package: alpine Version: 2.02+dfsg-2 Severity: normal If the variable reply-leadin contains _PREFDATETIME_, as for example reply-leadin=On _PREFDATETIME_ you wrote: the weekday in the reply is alway sunday, as for example On Sun Nov 7 13:48:0

Bug#653420: Info from Robert Tomsick

-- Forwarded message -- Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 16:54:03 From: Robert Tomsick To: ashe...@asheesh.org Subject: alpine bug #653420 Asheesh: I saw you addressed the DES/AES bug that I filed. Thanks! Unfortunately that fix won't matter much for users, as encrypted+signed messages a

Bug#687398: More information on how to reproduce the `dlopen' issue

On Wed, 24 Oct 2012, gregor herrmann wrote: The debdiff arrived some minutes later, but I don't see an upload. What's the status? Oh, snap, I neglected to upload the actual NMU. I will do that tonight, unless someone (gregoa?) beats me to it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-re

Bug#687398: Now FTBFS...?

I just tried to build my debdiff and do an NMU, and it ends with this message: Finished tests in 0.001844s, 2711.3306 tests/s, 15725.7175 assertions/s. 5 tests, 29 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 skips make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/rhash-1.2.9/bindings' /usr/bin/make -C bindings b

Bug#691736: I'm looking forward to this list

ACK In the future, I expect list traffic from 'users' to dominate 'developer' discussion, and that we might have to split the list. For now, I think debian-cloud is a good start. If we need a new list called debian-cloud-devel then we can make that when the time comes. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, em

Bug#687582: alpine: deadlock in signal handler

Thank you for this excellent bug report. I've run into this issue before, and your diagnosis is very helpful! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#682519: Still looking for sponsor?

Hi there, I'm a Debian Developer and possibly interested in reviewing and sponsoring this! Are you still looking? Cheers, -- Asheesh. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#631758: Why I consider this 'serious'

Hi Holger and all, This bug makes alpine "in the package maintainer's... opinion", "unsuitable for release", as per http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities (I will say I'm open to discussion on the topic.) The first thing that every new alpine user will see is an enthusiastic messag

Bug#689251: unblock: alpine/2.02+dfsg-2

required if you are using +an mbox file, but since reading system mail is within the core +functionality of alpine, it seems sensible that alpine should do that +without warnings out of the box.) (Closes: #414264) + * ACKing NMU by Johnathan McCrohan. Thank you! + + -- Asheesh Laroia

Bug#687398: More information on how to reproduce the `dlopen' issue

wRAR, thank you for your excellent detective work. Here's how you reproduce this build issue without even enabling parallel build. (Sadly I can't actually reproduce the brokenness from within dpkg-buildpackage by setting parallel build options; maybe my machine doesn't have as many cores as

Bug#687398: (no subject)

am build system, and later rename it +to 'rhash' as needed. (Closes: #687398) + + -- Asheesh Laroia Sun, 30 Sep 2012 15:16:28 -0700 + rhash (1.2.9-7) unstable; urgency=low * Fixed dependencies of ruby-rhash diff -Nru rhash-1.2.9/debian/rules rhash-1.2.9/debian/rules --- rhash-1.

Bug#687931: JPEG 2000, signed ints, and C

I can reproduce the crash. Note that "openjpeg-tools" does not crash on this file. Demonstration: Run these: sudo apt-get install openjpeg-tools wget http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi\?msg\=5\;filename\=jas_image_readcmpt2_SIGABRT.j2k\;att\=1\;bug\=687931 -O bugreport.j2k Then w

Bug#666176: Suggesting disabling tracker-miner-evolution

Hey all, Given the lack of movement by upstream on this issue, and the fact that they acknowledge the bug, and that https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733523 has been open for about a year with no evidence of resolution coming soon, I would suggest simply not building the (known-bad)

Bug#682519: Quick notes

First of all, let me say thank you for beginning the work to package this in Debian! Wow... this is a solid package: * You have a man page. * It's lintian clean. * /usr/bin/fbcmd doesn't have a .php extension. How did you even manage to make such an excellent package!? I can't find anything

Bug#692870: the PREFDATETIME token (fwd)

On Mon, 19 Nov 2012, Martin Ziegler wrote: Dear Asheesh, I forward you an email from Eduardo Chappa. I tested his patch with alpine2.02. It resolves the issue. Hi Martin, That's great to know! Mr. Chappa and the re-alpine team (and myself) seemed to experience a disagreement over copyrigh

Bug#383853: (no subject)

I suggest that we rename 'rred' to 'apply-pdiff'. If that is a suitable solution, I can try to implement it. (I honestly found it quite surprising, nearly scary, that apt was printing this non-word. It made me suspicious that an attacker had compromised my machine. Not super rational of me, bu

Bug#680141: RFS: liblastfm/0.4.0~git20090710-2 [RC]

I'm concerned by the following lintian warnings on mentors, which I can reproduce locally: W: liblastfm-fingerprint0: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblastfm_fingerprint.so.0.4.0 W: liblastfm0: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblastfm.so.0.4.0

Bug#680407: unblock: liblicense/0.8.1-3

/debian/control liblicense-0.8.1/debian/control --- liblicense-0.8.1/debian/control 2012-03-03 08:21:31.0 -0600 +++ liblicense-0.8.1/debian/control 2012-06-25 20:13:16.0 -0600 @@ -2,10 +2,10 @@ Section: libs Priority: extra Maintainer: Asheesh Laroia -Uploaders: Paul Tagliamo

Bug#680141: This seems fine to upload

John Stamp, can you clear the debdiff with the release team in an email to debian-release? Just email them the debdiff and ask if that would be okay, and if they say yes, I will upload this. (If you already have a sponsor lined up, then that's fine, too.) Thanks! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#657046: (no subject)

Thanks for this bug report! I can confirm the issue, and I believe this is very important. Upstream has a patch that fixes it, but we should try to get the updated version into the upcoming release of Debian. I will work on that. Thank you again for the report. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d

Bug#685961: pu: package alpine/2.00+dfsg-6+squeeze1

g @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +alpine (2.00+dfsg-6+squeeze1) squeeze; urgency=low + + * Fix a crash in the embedded copy of UW-IMAP, CVE-2008-5514. +(Closes: #653238) + + -- Asheesh Laroia Sun, 26 Aug 2012 16:58:01 -0700 + alpine (2.00+dfsg-6) unstable; urgency=low * Add diversion for pico and rem

Bug#685961: pu: package alpine/2.00+dfsg-6+squeeze1

On Wed, 29 Aug 2012, Adam D. Barratt wrote: I assume from reading through the bug report that the issue does not affect the version of alpine currently in wheezy / sid? If so, please add an appropriate fixed version to make this clear. It doesn't look like this happened yet? Just did; sorr

Bug#414264: Fixed shortly

tags 414264 pending thanks This warning can be fixed by simply adding a dependency on 'mlock' within the packaging, so that is what I have done. It's a simple solution. Thanks to all for the discussion! I've committed the packaging changes to the Subversion repository I use for alpine packag

Bug#657046: alpine: diff for NMU version 2.02+dfsg-1.1

On Sat, 8 Sep 2012, Ulrich Dangel wrote: Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for alpine (versioned as 2.02+dfsg-1.1). The diff is attached to this message. Hi Ulrich, and Jonathan, Thank you for improving this package, and sorry I didn't do this yet! I will be working on requesting a fre

Bug#702198: I confirm the suggested fix addresses the problem

It would be nice if package metadata indicated this conflict. Regardless, I ran this command and got this output, and my crash went away. $ sudo apt-get install libwebkitgtk-1.0-0/unstable libwebkitgtk-3.0-0/unstable libjavascriptcoregtk-3.0-0/unstable Reading package lists... Done Building

Bug#649579: Yes, please take this upstream

Thanks for the bug report! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#692870: Thanks

Hi Eduardo, It is great to see you active on this Debian bug, and to indicate that it's fixed in 2.10! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#674067: Thanks!

Hi Eduardo, Just a quick note to say thanks for publishing and sharing this fix ages ago, and for rolling it into the alpine 2.10 release. Sorry about the oddity with your patches site triggering email rejection. I will see what I can do about that. -- Asheesh. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#405762:

On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Stas Sușcov wrote: I got a patched version in my ppa. https://edge.launchpad.net/~sushkov/+archive/ppa Also searching existing ppa's can bring you patched version 2. https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+ppas?name_filter=alpine Thanks to the author, though having the code lic

Bug#405762: Maildir patch to try

Hi all, First of all, it's April 1, but this is not an April fools joke. There appears to be an old PINE Maildir patch at http://www.gluelogic.com/code/pine-maildir/ that is truly BSD licensed. I just learned about it thanks to Eduardo Chappa who pointed me there. It has some flaws, I hear.

Bug#565000: The patch looks good, but we should also make sure the code hunk is upstream

Tags: pending I'll upload this to a DELAYED queue shortly as it is a release-critical bug. Thanks for the fix! I can't find an upstream bug tracking system, but we should make sure to share this. It's interesting that you made a real code fix because -Werror found the problem. Goes to show

Bug#565000: Uploaded to DELAYED/7

Tag: fixed I've tested it, and uploaded this fix to DELAYED/7. The new upstream release also probably fixes this, so if the maintainers here want to just upload a new upstream release that'd be neat. (-: Ciao for now, -- Asheesh. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.

Bug#636066: I am on i386 and tried to reproduce this but it didn't crash

I just ran it in a i386 chroot with the same package version, and when I am listening to a station and press "=", it does not crash. Maybe it's dependent on the data you are getting. Do you find that it reliably crashes for you when you do this? Another user, trying to help, -- Asheesh. -

Bug#625177: Feedback on your patch

Tag: patch Hi Noah, Your patch looks good. It's customary to use plain text email, rather than HTML, and also to add a tag to the bug indicating that there is a patch. http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#tags explains about tags. I'm testing now, and will upload to DELAYED/1 if it passes mu

Bug#625177: Uploaded to DELAYED/5

Tag: fixed I uploaded this patched package to DELAYED/5! Maintainer, please feel free to beat the upload if you like. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#625177: Uploaded to DELAYED/5

On Mon, 22 Aug 2011, Sven Mueller wrote: On Mon, August 22, 2011 3:25 am, Asheesh Laroia wrote: Tag: fixed I uploaded this patched package to DELAYED/5! Maintainer, please feel free to beat the upload if you like. I currently don't have time and also (more importantly) no access to my

Bug#609592: Any updates on this?

Hi dear bug and maintainer, I was hoping to run MySQL 5.5, and noticed that there is even an (UNOFFICIAL) source package here: http://people.debian.org/~nobse/mysql-5.5/mysql-5.5_5.5.13-2.dsc Is there a reason this isn't in Debian? If it, for example, needs certain kinds of testing, I could

Bug#643349: alpine: FTBFS: flocklnx.c:60:7: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security]

Thanks for filing this bug. I will take a look and see what the best fix is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#702085: I am going to attempt to execute these instructions

Lucas: I am also working on a project where I want to use the upload_history table, so I want to fix this as well. I hope it's OK if, to implement the plan described here, I use sudo on ullmann to switch into the 'udd' user. I have very rarely logged into Debian machines, but it seems from h

Bug#702085: A report (no sudo used)

Hey all, This will probably come as no surprise to Lucas, but I can report that with the current scripts, and data copied from /home/lucas/public_html/ddc-parser on master, I can generate a reasonable upload_history table on my laptop. Given that, I'm happy to be given whatever keys are nece

Bug#702085: A report (no sudo used)

Thanks for this. I'm on the job now. Some parts are taking a while, so it might take until tomorrow to fully fix. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#702085: I have configured this to work via cron

I'll test tomorrow if it remains working, but so far, it seems reasonable. If it seems to keep working tomorrow, I will document on this bug what all I changed. Lucas, you might want me to rearrange some files/directories; I'm not sure what idioms there are with regard to /srv/udd/. -- Ashees

Bug#702085: debian-devel-changes is importing correctly

A more full report is forthcoming. I wanted to first declare success here, and then explain how things work for benefit of later readers (or current UDD maintainers with opinions on how to change them). I created a query that conveniently limits the width of the query to <= 80 characters, to a

Bug#702085: Report on what is changed to solve this bug

Here is what I did. == Configured inbound email == I did what was suggested in the earlier comment to configure inbound emails to debian-devel-changes to arrive in /srv/udd.debian.org/incoming-mail/changes . == Copy archives to ullmann == I copied the archives on master to: /srv/udd.debian

Bug#715216: qa.debian.org: collab-qa/upload-history: Software trusts "Date" headers which are sometimes set wrong

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: udd I've found (and reproduced) an issue in the collab-qa/upload-history code. (By that, I mean the stuff you can get from here: svn+ssh://paulprot...@svn.debian.org/svn/collab-qa/upload-history ) I was

Bug#715216: qa.debian.org: collab-qa/upload-history: Software trusts "Date" headers which are sometimes set wrong

(Sorry about a not fully formed thought on numeral 2 in the numbered list in the last message. Typing and thinking too fast.) Anyway, as an update to this: further research indicates that upload-history is simply spitting out the data from the email in a "Message-Date" field. I can't blame the

Bug#715216: qa.debian.org: collab-qa/upload-history: Software trusts "Date" headers which are sometimes set wrong

New proposed fix: In collab-qa/upload-history/munge_ddc.py , if the Message-Date we were going to emit is not within the year of the envelope From, plus/minus one year, we drop Message-Date. This permits the udd/upload_history_gatherer.py code to use its existing logic about dropping replaci

Bug#715216: qa.debian.org: collab-qa/upload-history: Software trusts "Date" headers which are sometimes set wrong

On Wed, 10 Jul 2013, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Hi Asheesh, Sorry for the delayed reply. Thanks a lot for your work on this. I've added you to collab-qa, so you should be able to push your code yourself. Yay! Thanks! Now, one comment on your changes: it would be better if everything you do is

Bug#719845: dpkg-source: Make file order within {data,control}.tar.gz deterministic

Package: dpkg Version: 1.16.10 Severity: normal *** Please type your report below this line *** Summary: To move toward https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds for maintainers who want their binary packages to be able to be reproduced bit-for-bit, it would be needed for dpkg to sort the fil

Bug#719844: dpkg-source: Make compresing of {data,control}.tar.gz a deterministic process

Package: dpkg Version: 1.16.10 Severity: normal *** Please type your report below this line *** Summary: In lib/dpkg/compress.c, I would like it if dpkg did not store timestamps in the gzip files. That way, the creation of the data.tar.gz would be deterministic. In particular, when I build a

  1   2   3   4   >