Bug#339287: c++filt hangs with gcj

2005-11-17 Thread Andrew Haley
See http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-11/msg00275.html. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#678793: -gcj packages and openjdk-built jars

2012-07-18 Thread Andrew Haley
On 07/18/2012 02:48 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 02:28:42PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote: >> On 07/18/2012 02:02 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote: >>> - compile the jar.sos against -java-commons jars (b-d on itself on kbsd-*) >> >> The .jar.so files hav

Bug#678793: -gcj packages and openjdk-built jars

2012-07-18 Thread Andrew Haley
On 07/18/2012 02:02 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote: > - compile the jar.sos against -java-commons jars (b-d on itself on kbsd-*) The .jar.so files have no compile-time dependencies on anything. All dependencies are resolved at runtime. Andrew. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@li

Bug#699757: Java 6 support ending, Java 7 not in squeeze

2013-02-05 Thread Andrew Haley
On 02/04/2013 05:27 PM, Christian Bernardt wrote: > Debian squeeze does provide openjdk-6-jdk as part of its default-jdk > package. Here it can be seen that > http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html Java 6 end of > support will be end of this month. That's Oracle proprietary Java.

Bug#868255: openjdk-9: Please build with --with-debug-level=slowdebug on Zero-only architectures

2017-07-17 Thread Andrew Haley
On 13/07/17 21:01, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Source: openjdk-9 > Version: 9~b177-3 > Severity: normal If no-one at Debian can fix this, you could send me a login. -- Andrew Haley Java Platform Lead Engineer Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com> EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98

Bug#868255: openjdk-9: Please build with --with-debug-level=slowdebug on Zero-only architectures

2017-08-01 Thread Andrew Haley
: "=&f"(tmp), "=Q"(*(volatile double*)dst) : "Q"(*(volatile double*)src)); Note that we dereference src and dst and pass the actual memory operands to the asm, not just pointers to them. (This might be more detail than you need, and

Bug#868255: openjdk-9: Please build with --with-debug-level=slowdebug on Zero-only architectures

2017-08-01 Thread Andrew Haley
On 01/08/17 13:57, Andrew Haley wrote: > NOTE THAT you should not increase the thread sizes in > os_linux_zero.cpp: these are minimums. Change the values in > hotspot/src/os_cpu/linux_zero/vm/globals_linux_zero.hpp and > common/autoconf/boot-jdk.m4 . Sorry, I should have said: set

Bug#868255: openjdk-9: Please build with --with-debug-level=slowdebug on Zero-only architectures

2017-08-02 Thread Andrew Haley
could just patch the packages. I'll put it in to JDK 10. -- Andrew Haley Java Platform Lead Engineer Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com> EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-02-16 Thread Andrew Haley
Thomas Girard wrote: Hello, A while ago, I wrote: Using the following pakages: * java-gcj-compat{,-dev} 1.0.69-2 * ecj, ecj-gcj, libecj-java and libecj-gcj 3.3.0+0728-1 * libgcj-bc, libgcj8{-1,-1-awt,-jar} 4.2.1-3 * gcc-4.2-base 4.2.1-3 * gcj-4.1-base, gcj-4.1, gij-4.1, libgcj7-1 4

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-02-16 Thread Andrew Haley
Michael Koch wrote: On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 09:56:18AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: Has anyone actually attempted to debug this? Which code actually calls Runtime.exit()? I tried to debug this but I dont found out from where exit is called with code 13. What went wrong with the debugging

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-02-17 Thread Andrew Haley
Michael Koch wrote: On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 10:33:21AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: Michael Koch wrote: On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 09:56:18AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: Has anyone actually attempted to debug this? Which code actually calls Runtime.exit()? I tried to debug this but I dont found

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-03-02 Thread Andrew Haley
Michael Koch wrote: On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:50:38PM +0100, Thomas Girard wrote: Hello, A while ago, I wrote: Using the following pakages: * java-gcj-compat{,-dev} 1.0.69-2 * ecj, ecj-gcj, libecj-java and libecj-gcj 3.3.0+0728-1 * libgcj-bc, libgcj8{-1,-1-awt,-jar} 4.2.1-3 * gcc-

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-03-02 Thread Andrew Haley
Michael Koch wrote: On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 10:35:28AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: And what was the reason? I need to know. !ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi 4 0 2008-03-02 12:38:50.196 !MESSAGE Application error !STACK 1 java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.eclipse.core.runtime.Plugin at

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-03-02 Thread Andrew Haley
Michael Koch wrote: On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 12:01:03PM +, Andrew Haley wrote: Michael Koch wrote: On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 10:35:28AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: And what was the reason? I need to know. !ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi 4 0 2008-03-02 12:38:50.196 !MESSAGE Application error !STACK

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-03-02 Thread Andrew Haley
Andrew Haley wrote: There are areas where compliant jvms might behave differently. For example, the exact time when dependent classes are loaded isn't defined. Maybe at class initialization time, maybe later. All the the spec requires is that ClassNotFoundExceptions aren't ra

Bug#479952: libc6/s390 - __pthread_mutex_lock: Assertion `mutex->__data.__owner == 0' failed.

2008-10-27 Thread Andrew Haley
Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Is there anything from an outsider that could help? > > I've seen this on-and-off again on the hppa-linux port. The issue has, > in my experience, been a compiler problem. My standard operating >

Bug#479952: libc6/s390 - __pthread_mutex_lock: Assertion `mutex->__data.__owner == 0' failed.

2008-10-27 Thread Andrew Haley
Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:05 AM, Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I've seen this on-and-off again on the hppa-linux port. The issue has, >>> in my experience, been a compiler problem. My standard operating >>> pr

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-03-04 Thread Andrew Haley
Michael Koch wrote: On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 12:01:03PM +, Andrew Haley wrote: Michael Koch wrote: On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 10:35:28AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: And what was the reason? I need to know. !ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi 4 0 2008-03-02 12:38:50.196 !MESSAGE Application error !STACK

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-03-04 Thread Andrew Haley
Andrew Haley wrote: Michael Koch wrote: On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 12:01:03PM +, Andrew Haley wrote: Michael Koch wrote: On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 10:35:28AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: And what was the reason? I need to know. !ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi 4 0 2008-03-02 12:38:50.196 !MESSAGE

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-03-05 Thread Andrew Haley
Andrew Haley wrote: > Michael Koch wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 12:01:03PM +0000, Andrew Haley wrote: >>> Michael Koch wrote: >>>> On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 10:35:28AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: >>>>> And what was the reason? I need to know. >

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-03-05 Thread Andrew Haley
Andrew Haley wrote: > Andrew Haley wrote: >> OK, I've found it. The ClassNotFoundException is thrown from a security >> check >> in libgcj. We are calling Method m1 from method m0, and m1's class loader >> is different from m0's class loader. We have

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS

2007-10-22 Thread Andrew Haley
Thomas Girard writes: > Le mercredi 10 octobre 2007 à 12:36 +0200, Thomas Girard a écrit : > > Just another hint on this one: using etch to recompile eclipse-cdt > > *does* work. So it's likely a problem in the toolchain. > > Moving from an etch chroot to sid, I was able to find out that the

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS

2007-10-22 Thread Andrew Haley
Thomas Girard writes: > It built successfully in June[2], and started to fail building in July[3]. Ping Doko: what did you change in this time window? Andrew. -- Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, UK Registered in England and Wales No. 379890

Bug#470454: RM: arm: gtk/gnome java stack RoP;

2008-03-11 Thread Andrew Haley
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: important Riku Voipio wrote: > Package: ftp.debian.org > Severity: important > > The following source packages are unbuildable and out of date on > arm, thus blocking testing transition. It seems unlikely that java will > properly work on oldabi arm, so please re

Bug#559967: FTBFS [hppa]: method openConnection() in the type URL is not...

2009-12-14 Thread Andrew Haley
On 12/14/2009 04:58 PM, dann frazier wrote: > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 02:10:18PM +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote: >> AFAIK, GCJ uses classpath library these days. The code from classpath >> is being merged in GCJ. And from the status of classpath [1] it is >> clear that java.net.URL.openConnection(java.n