Control: fixed -1 310.14-1
On 2012-11-03 08:46, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> This build failure is fixed/not-seen on the recently uploaded 3.6 kernel
> in Debian experimental.
Great! Did you try 304.60-1 from sid, too?
I'm too lazy to look into this as long as linux-headers-3.6-trunk-* is
uninstal
Control: reassign -1 blcr-dkms
Control: force-merge 638339 -1
On 2012-11-03 20:13, Sebastian Niehaus wrote:
> I did an dist-upgrade on my wheezy system today.
> run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/header_postinst.d/dkms 3.2.0-4-amd64
> Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 3.2.0-4-am
Control: notfound -1 2.8.0-5
Control: fixed -1 2.8.0-5
Control: close -1
On Tuesday, 10. July 2012 05:38:06 tony mancill wrote:
> In looking into this, I was confused to discover that the latest version
> of jspwiki 2.8.0-5 uploaded to unstable actually does depend on tomcat6,
> but didn't close #
Package: jspwiki
Version: 2.8.0-5
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies conffiles.
This is forbidden by the policy, see
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-config-files
10.7.3: "[.
Control: notfound -1 0.8-2
Control: notfound -1 0.9.1-1
Control: close -1
On 2012-10-07 01:41, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 10/06/2012 06:09 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>
> [ ... incredible debugging saga snipped ... ]
>
>> going to look into dpkg :-)
>>
>> ...
Control: fixed -1 2.0.0~b2-5
On 2012-11-06 19:49, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Currently rt4-extension-assettracker is considered an RC-buggy leaf
> package[0] and will eventually be removed from testing unless this RC
> bug is dealt with (fixed, downgraded etc.).
cannot reproduce this problem with piu
On Wednesday, 19. September 2012 21:05:03 Piotr Borkowski wrote:
> File-rc doesn't restore rcX.d dirs at remove. This breaks sysv-rc
> legacy_bootordering postinst function. After sysv-rc installation this
> leads to empty rcX.d dirs and broken system. Maybe file-rc should call
I can reproduce thi
On 2012-11-08 17:12, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> Version: 304.48-1
> Gnome shell hangs randomly and I have to restart the gdm session to get back
> gui
> control. This happens quite frequently. Some errors in Xorg.0.log point to an
> nvidia xorg problem, but I am not sure.
Please try 304.64-1 from u
On 2012-11-08 17:52, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> To install the nvidia package from unstable, do the following:
> aptitude install xserver-xorg-video-nvidia -t unstable
It's probably easier to do this on the nvidia-glx package, which is a
metapackage that pulls in several other nvidia packages via v
Control: merge -1 692757
Control: fixed -1 1:12-8-1~exp
On 2012-11-08 17:40, safridzal wrote:
> upgrading to fglrx-driver 12-8-1~exp amd64 solve this problem
What about versions that are actually in the archive?
fglrx-driver | 1:12-6+point-3 | sid/non-free
fglrx-driver | 1:12.10-1| e
On 2012-11-08 06:27, Vincent Cheng wrote:
> When upgrading from 304.60-1 -> 304.64-1, there are a number of
> packages that break in a multiarch configuration, i.e.:
> trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/libcuda1/changelog.gz',
> which is different from other instances of package libcuda1:
On 2012-10-08 14:00, Günter wrote:
> UPDATE: checked with 304.51, it's the same!
Please try 304.64 (unstable) and 310.14 (experimental).
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 2012-09-24 17:44, hetas wrote:
> Something has happened between driver versions 302.17 and 304.48 that
> prevent changing refresh rate using xrandr. I'm on Debian and those
Please try 304.64 (unstable) and 310.14 (experimental)
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@l
On 2012-09-15 00:46, Andres Cimmarusti wrote:
> Just tested version 304.48 of the nvidia binary drivers and the
> problem is still present. I've attached the nvidia-bug-report.
Please try 304.64 (sid) and 310.14 (experimental).
Thanks
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ.
On 2012-11-08 21:15, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> In the context of 1.6/1.8, I’d first install the above patch and see
> whether it improves things.
I just tried relax-guardians-test.diff and the build now succeeds in my
pbuilder i386 chroot on amd64 (while -10.2 still fails).
Andreas
--
To UNSUBS
On 2012-11-09 08:23, Daniel Hartwig wrote:
> On 9 November 2012 09:22, Daniel Hartwig wrote:
>> Andreas, I am not a DM, will you take care of this again?
You need a DD to do this NMU, so I cannot (yet) help there.
> I presume too much! :-)
>
> I have uploaded this package to mentors with the at
Control: found -1 304.64-1
Control: found -1 310.14-1
Original Message
Subject: Re: Bug#689954: Module does not load/recognize GT650M albeit it
should
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 00:13:30 +0100
From: Günter
To: Andreas Beckmann
hi andreas,
nope, neither of 304.64 nor 310.14
on
Control: found -1 2.3.4-4
Control: affects -1 + libqglviewer2
Control: tag -1 experimental
On Thursday, 25. October 2012 19:34:58 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> a test with piuparts revealed that your package misses the copyright
> file after an upgrade from sid to experimental, which is a vio
Control: found -1 3.0.9-3
Hi,
I just noticed the
Conflicts: libc6-i386 (<= 2.9-18)
that was supposedly added in 3.0.7-2 has disappeared later on again,
causing incorrect updates from lenny to squeeze by installing the
library over the /usr/lib32 -> /emul/... symlink before that gets
replaced
Package: dovecot-core
Version: 1:2.1.7-3
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned
directories on the system after purge, which is a violation of
policy 6.8:
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/
Package: cdd-dev
Version: 0.6.15
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
a test with piuparts revealed that your package misses the copyright
file after an upgrade from lenny to squeeze to wheezy, which is a violation of
Policy 12.5:
http://www.debian.org/doc/deb
Package: crawl
Version: 2:0.10.3-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
a test with piuparts revealed that your package misses the copyright
file after an upgrade from lenny to squeeze to wheezy, which is a violation of
Policy 12.5:
http://www.debian.org/doc/d
Package: libfbclient2
Version: 2.5.2~svn+54698.ds4-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
a test with piuparts revealed that your package misses the copyright
file after an upgrade from lenny to squeeze to wheezy, which is a violation of
Policy 12.5:
http://ww
Package: libsnmp-perl
Version: 5.4.3~dfsg-2.5
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
a test with piuparts revealed that your package misses the copyright
file after an upgrade from lenny to squeeze to wheezy, which is a violation of
Policy 12.5:
http://www.debia
Package: nettle-bin
Version: 2.4-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
a test with piuparts revealed that your package misses the copyright
file after an upgrade from lenny to squeeze to wheezy, which is a violation of
Policy 12.5:
http://www.debian.org/doc/d
Package: libklibc-dev
Version: 2.0.1-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
a test with piuparts revealed that your package misses the copyright
file after an upgrade from lenny to squeeze to wheezy, which is a violation of
Policy 12.5:
http://www.debian.org/d
Package: ulogd-mysql,ulogd-pcap,ulogd-pgsql,ulogd-sqlite3
Version: 1.24-3.2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
a test with piuparts revealed that your package misses the copyright
file after an upgrade from lenny to squeeze to wheezy, which is a violation of
Package: courier-mta
Version: 0.68.2-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to remove some
diversions after upgrading from lenny to squeeze to wheezy and removing
the package afterwards.
Filing this a
2012 15:00:16 +0800
+
+guile-1.6 (1.6.8-10.2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Do not modify package content after calling dh_md5sums. (Closes: #688288)
+
+ -- Andreas Beckmann Sat, 29 Sep 2012 20:08:15 +0200
+
guile-1.6 (1.6.8-10.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non
Package: reportbug
Version: 6.4.3
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
it might be useful to enhance the unblock request handling to
* add X-Debbugs-Cc: $pack...@packages.debian.org
to notify the maintainer about the unbock request, useful for team
maintenance or if e.g. a NMUer requests the unblock
* ad
On 2012-10-04 15:40, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2012-09-27 12:16, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> Please approve the following changes for package
>> nvidia-graphics-drivers:
>>
>> As discussed in #688861 (freeze exception for libxvmc) yesterday, there
>> is another p
On 2012-12-13 16:31, Tom Epperly wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion. I do seem to have one '*-dkms' package installed.
>> dpkg --list '*-dkms'
> ii nvidia-kernel- 304.64-2 amd64NVIDIA binary kernel module DKMS
does
dkms status
list anything else?
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Package: php-horde-role
Version: 1.0.1-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package creates files in the
users $HOME:
0m32.9s ERROR: FAIL: Package purging left files on system:
/local/not owned
/local/p
On 2012-12-14 11:52, Mathieu Parent wrote:
> 2012/12/14 Andreas Beckmann :
>> /local/piuparts/piupartss/.pearrc not owned
>> This may not be a fault of php-horde-role but of something related to
>> PEAR or the way how pear is used ...
> This creation probably co
Package: python2.7-minimal
Version: 2.7.3-12
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to purge.
According to policy 7.2 you cannot rely on the depends being available
during purge, only the essential packag
Package: plymouth-x11
Version: 0.8.8-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: affects -1 + plymouth-dev
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'squeeze'.
It installed fine in 'squeeze', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
b
Followup-For: Bug #684758
Hi,
the fix from the NMU seems to be lost in the last maintainer upload.
Upgrades from squeeze to sid currently fail with missing copyright
files.
Andreas
libphone-utils0-dbg_0.1+git20110523-2.log.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Followup-For: Bug #695845
Hi,
the dependecy loop is still present:
Setting up open-vm-tools (2:9.2.2-893683-2) ...
Setting up x11-common (1:7.7+1) ...
insserv: There is a loop at service open-vm-tools if started
insserv: loop involving service open-vm-tools at depth 1
insserv: There
Followup-For: Bug #695845
open-vm-tools-dbg_2:9.2.2-893683-2.log.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Package: fuse-utils
Version: 2.9.0-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package installs files over
an existing symlink, overwriting files from another package in a way
that is not detected by dpkg:
0m54.6s INFO: d
Package: libmcs-dev
Version: 0.7.2-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during an upgrade test with piuparts I noticed your package installs
files over an existing symlink, overwriting files from another package
in a way that is not detected by dpkg:
0m43.8
Package: libdv-bin
Version: 1.0.0-4
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during an upgrade test with piuparts I noticed your package installs
files over an existing symlink, overwriting files from another package
in a way that is not detected by dpkg:
1m1.5s
Package: libgc-dev
Version: 1:7.1-9
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during an upgrade test with piuparts I noticed your package installs
files over an existing symlink, overwriting files from another package
in a way that is not detected by dpkg:
0m42.9s
Package: python-cxx-dev
Version: 6.2.4-1
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during an upgrade test with piuparts I noticed your package installs
files over an existing symlink, overwriting files from another package
in a way that is not detected by dpkg:
0m51.2s INFO: dirnam
Package: lcl-utils
Version: 0.9.30.4-1.1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during an upgrade test with piuparts I noticed your package installs
files over an existing symlink, overwriting files from another package
in a way that is not detected by dpkg:
0m
Package: piuparts
Severity: normal
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: affects -1 + nessusd geordi mailreader pdbv
# /etc/nessus/nessusd.conf
Control: found -1 nessusd/2.2.10-3
# /etc/geordi/irc-config
Control: found -1 geordi/0:20080725T0146-1+lenny1
# /var/lib/mailreader
Package: geoip-database-contrib
Followup-For: Bug #666063
Control: found -1 1.10
Hi,
the problem is still present in 1.10:
Selecting previously unselected package geoip-database-contrib.
(Reading database ... 6900 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking geoip-database-contrib
I would opt for manual creation/updating, at least for now.
The following is not a solution:
[sid]
alias = unstable
(which should result in 'ln -s sid $HTDOCS/unstable')
because it will break
[sid/main]
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a s
Package: libgssdp-1.0-dev
Version: 0.12.2.1-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts replaces-without-breaks
Hi,
during a test with piuparts and EDOS tools I noticed your package causes
removal of files that also belong to another package.
This is caused by using Re
Package: xemacs21-nomule,xemacs21-mule-canna-wnn
Version: 21.4.22-4
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package removes files that
were installed by another package.
The removed files were already present before the
Package: samba4
Version: 4.0.0~beta2+dfsg1-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package removes files that
were installed by another package.
The removed files were already present before the package was installed,
Package: fts
Version: 0.1-4.2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze-ignore
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: fixed -1 1.0-1
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies conffiles.
This is forbidden by the policy, see
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/
Package: gnunet-server
Version: 0.8.1b-5
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze-ignore
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: fixed -1 0.9.2-1
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies conffiles.
This is forbidden by the policy, see
http://www.debian.org/doc/d
Package: fglrx-glx-ia32
Version: 1:10-9-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: fixed -1 1:11-6-1
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'lenny'.
It installed fine in 'lenny', then the upgrade to 'squeeze' fails.
>Fro
Package: libdv-bin,libdv4-dev
Version: 1.0.0-5
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
a test with piuparts revealed that your package misses the copyright
file after an upgrade from wheezy to sid, which is a violation of
Policy 12.5:
http://www.debian.org/doc/de
Package: texlive-base
Version: 2012.20121205-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: affects -1 + context
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid' to 'experimental'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to
Package: php-horde-role
Version: 1.0.1-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies conffiles.
This is forbidden by the policy, see
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-config-files
10.7
Package: multex-bin
Version: 0.8.1-9.1
Severity: serious
Tags: lenny
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: fixed -1 1.0-2
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a r
Package: mhc
Version: 0.25.1+20080720-1
Severity: serious
Tags: lenny
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: fixed -1 0.25.1+20090531-2
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too
On 2012-12-18 07:31, Tom Epperly wrote:
> # dkms status
> Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
> File: does not exist.
Hmm, weird. Please post the output of
find /etc/dkms /var/lib/dkms -ls
bash -x dkms status
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
Followup-For: Bug #694888
reassign 694888 ca-certificates-java 20121112+nmu1
forcemerge 694888 694889
retitle 694888 ca-certificates-java: early triggered jks-keystore may fail and
leave the temporary /etc/java-7-openjdk/jvm-$arch.cfg
affects 694888 + openjdk-7-jre-headless openjdk-7-source
thank
Control: tag -1 pending
On 2012-12-09 06:44, Adam Majer wrote:
> Package: nvidia-visual-profiler
> Unable to profile application.
> org.eclipse.core.runtime.CoreException: unable to find nvprof
Please install nvidia-cuda-toolkit.
Would it be useful to split out the nvprof binary from
nvidia-cud
Package: snort-pgsql,snort-mysql
Followup-For: Bug #603428
Control: found -1 2.8.5.2-8
The problem is still reproducible in a lenny->squeeze upgrade.
Setting up snort-common (2.8.5.2-8) ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/snort/threshold.conf ...
Configuration file `/etc/snort
Package: zabbix-server-pgsql
Version: 1:1.8.2-1squeeze4
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'lenny'.
It installed fine in 'lenny', then the upgrade to 'squeeze' fails.
>From the attache
Package: xpdf,xpdf-reader
Version: 3.02-12+squeeze1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed /usr/share/doc/xpdf-reader is
missing after an upgrade from lenny.
xpdf.preinst deletes /usr/share/doc/xpdf{,-reader}
Package: gnu-fdisk
Version: 1.2.4-3
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package does not properly
cleanup the diversions from lenny:
>From the attached log:
0m43.5s DEBUG: Modified(uid, gid, mode, size, target):
Package: mono-gac
Version: 2.6.7-5.1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: affects -1 + libgmime2.2-cil
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'lenny'.
It installed fine in 'lenny', then the upgrade to 's
Package: python-pydoctor
Version: 0.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'lenny'.
It installed fine in 'lenny', then the upgrade to 'squeeze' fails.
>From the attached
Package: prayer-templates
Version: 1.3.3-dfsg1-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
a test with piuparts revealed that your package misses the copyright
file after an upgrade from lenny to squeeze, which is a violation of
Policy 12.5:
http://www.debian.org/d
Package: gtkpod
Version: 0.99.14-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
a test with piuparts revealed that your package misses the copyright
file after an upgrade from lenny to squeeze, which is a violation of
Policy 12.5:
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-poli
Package: libglib2.0-0
Version: 2.33.12+really2.32.4-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
libglib2.0-0.postrm does some cleanup that is potentially harmful in a
multiarch setup. Just think about libglib2.0-0:someforeignarch being
removed while libglib2.0-0:na
On 2012-12-20 11:32, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 15.12.2012 23:18, schrieb Andreas Beckmann:
>> >From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
>>
>> Removing python2.7-minimal ...
>> Purging configuration files for python2.7-minimal ...
>> dpkg: error p
On 2012-12-20 14:38, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 20.12.2012 10:59, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> libglib2.0-0.postrm does some cleanup that is potentially harmful in a
>> multiarch setup. Just think about libglib2.0-0:someforeignarch being
>> removed while libglib2.0
IA*.so.1 library that was
+previously included in libgl1-nvidia-glx. The libgl1-nvidia-glx package
+was split in order to remove the libxvmc1 dependency and make it multiarch
+co-installable. (Closes: #676723, #685054, #686033, #688714)
+
+ -- Andreas Beckmann Thu, 20 Dec 2012 19
Package: grub-efi-amd64,grub-efi-ia32
Version: 1.99-24
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the sev
Package: digikam-data,kipi-plugins-common
Version: 4:3.0.0~beta1a-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid' to 'experimental'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'experime
And one more overwritten file:
Preparing to replace kipi-plugins-common 4:2.6.0-1 (using
.../kipi-plugins-common_4%3a3.0.0~beta1a-1_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement kipi-plugins-common ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/kipi-plugins-common_4%3a3.0.0~beta1a-1_all.deb
(--u
On 2012-09-20 07:30, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> You have an outstanding call for translations for the changes that
> modified these debconf templates. Please wait for it to complete and
[...]
> I can for instance make sure you get these 8 needed updates (among
> others probably). I can even "shake"
Package: openvas-scanner
Version: 3.2.3-4.1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies conffiles.
This is forbidden by the policy, see
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-config-files
1
Package: gcl
Followup-For: Bug #688201
Hi,
reopening this bug because you traded it for a worse one:
1m8.7s ERROR: FAIL: debsums reports modifications inside the chroot:
/usr/share/gcl/gcl
Andreas
gcl_2.6.7-105.log.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Package: openssl
Version: 1.0.1c-4
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
while doing piuparts tests I noticed several packages leaving around a
/root/.rnd file. The thing all these have in common is a (indirect)
dependency on openssl:
courier-mta-ssl
cour
Package: metche
Version: 1:1.2.2-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge. But the actual problem is that these files are
created at all and in a FHS violating locati
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.16.8
Severity: important
Hi,
moving a conffile from old-pkg to new-pkg with
Package: old-pkg
Depends: new-pkg (>= X)
Package: new-pkg
Breaks: old-pkg (<< X)
Replaces: old-pkg (<< X)
seems to work, also if the conffile gets replaced by an updated version
on the way, but
On 2012-10-03 17:19, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Oct 2012, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> seems to work, also if the conffile gets replaced by an updated version
>> on the way, but it leaves an old md5sum entry in the Conffiles entry of
>> old-pkg in the status fi
59)
+ * Swedish (sv): Martin Bagge (Closes: #688425)
+
+ [ Andreas Beckmann ]
+ * libgl1-fglrx-glx:i386: Breaks: ia32-libs (<< 1:0). ia32-libs has added an
+epoch to not clash with updated monolithic packages in proposed-updates.
+
+ -- Andreas Beckmann Wed, 03 Oct 2012 15:20
Package: cxref
Followup-For: Bug #688562
Control: found -1 1.6d-4
Hi,
things are getting worse:
0m24.8s ERROR: FAIL: debsums reports modifications inside the chroot:
/usr/share/cxref/config
/usr/share/cxref/cxref-cpp.defines
Andreas
cxref_1.6d-4.log.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed dat
Package: exabgp
Version: 3.0.10-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies conffiles.
This is forbidden by the policy, see
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-config-files
10.7.3: "[.
On 2012-10-02 12:19, Randy Li wrote:
> The mplayer is from svn
Please try the packaged version of mplayer - does it show the same problems?
> I run it mplayer -vo vdpau -vc ffh264vdpau
[...]
> [vdpau] Error when calling vdp_device_create_x11: 1
> Error opening/initializing the selected video_out
Package: wine-unstable
Version: 1.5.6-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package misses a copyright
file. This violates policy 12.5:
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#s-copyrightfile
"[...] /usr
Package: pdnsd
Version: 1.2.8-par-2.3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies conffiles.
This is forbidden by the policy, see
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-config-files
10.7.3:
Package: jabberd2
Version: 2.2.8-2.2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships
/var/run/jabberd2 which is a violation of Policy 9.1.4:
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-opersys.html#s-fhs-run
"[...]
Package: jabberd2
Version: 2.2.8-2.2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies conffiles.
This is forbidden by the policy, see
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-config-files
10.7.3:
Package: libapache2-mod-dacs
Version: 1.4.27b-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies conffiles.
This is forbidden by the policy, see
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-config-file
Package: gworkspace-apps-wrappers
Version: 0.8.8-1.1
Severity: normal
Hi,
while looking through the Contents file I noticed a
/lib/GNUstep/Applications/ owned by gworkspace-apps-wrappers.
Every other package uses /usr/lib/GNUstep/Applications/
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-
Package: icinga-common
Version: 1.7.1-4
Severity: serious
Hi,
I noticed that icinga-common ships /var/run/icinga, which is forbidden
by policy 9.1.4:
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-opersys.html#s-fhs-run
"[...] Packages must not include files or directories under /run, or
under the ol
Package: biomaj
Followup-For: Bug #688433
Control: found -1 1.2.0-8
Hi,
I don't know what /usr/share/biomaj/bin/env.sh is being used for, but
modifying a shipped file is not a good idea - it will be overwritten on
every upgrade.
Andreas
biomaj_1.2.0-8.log.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed da
Package: entangle
Version: 0.4.1-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies a file it
ships: /usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas/gschemas.compiled. Or maybe ships a
file that is created/updated by triggers from a
Package: smbind
Version: 0.4.7-5.2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies some shipped
files. This looks like a bad interaction with dbconfig-common, as these
files will be overwritten on every upgrade
Package: sympa
Version: 6.1.11~dfsg-4
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies conffiles.
And even worse, it's a conffile owned by a different package.
This is forbidden by the policy, see
http://www.debi
On 2012-10-04 11:10, Ognyan Kulev wrote:
> Package: libvdpau1
> Version: 0.4.1-7
>
> Nearly 500 Ubuntu users reported that they are affected by blue skin in
> e.g. youtube videos using recent flash player when libvdpau1 is in use.
> It's entirely Adobe's fault for this deffect:
> https://bugs.laun
801 - 900 of 15613 matches
Mail list logo
