On 2013-10-22 10:31, Niels Thykier wrote:
> I don't think the binNMU is an option (any longer?) since testing now
> has 1.0.0-11.
Which is of course the better solution :-)
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu libgdal-grass_1.9.0-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against grass 6.4.3"
dw libgdal-grass_1.9.0-1 . ia64 . -m "grass-dev (>= 6.4.3)"
libgdal-grass is no longer installable in sid due to a dependen
On 2013-02-23 18:51, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo upstream
>
> On Friday, 13. July 2012 18:58:48 Christian Tremel wrote:
>> ok, i downgraded the nvidia-dkms to 295.59-1 from snapshot "
>> http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20120710T092809Z/
Control: reassign -1 nvidia-legacy-304xx-driver 304.64-3
On 2013-01-13 20:52, Harald wrote:
> Andreas,
>
> thanks for your suggestions. I followed those and installed the 486
> kernel and combined the 686-pae and the 486 kernel with nvidia driver
> 304.64 (the actual one), 173.14.35 (from legacy-
Hi,
On 2013-02-20 13:05, Travel wrote:
> I apologize for my English. When you move a window in the top of the
> screen, you can see the band, especially the band are clearly visible when
> playing video (in this letter is embedded video, which was filmed on the
> phone, specially selected video wi
On 2012-11-25 12:00, Roberto Di Cosmo wrote:
> After careful investigation, this issue comes from
> an upstream design decision in the 3xx driver series.
>
> In this new series of the NVidia driver, for reasons
> that completely escape my understanding, the user
> is directly exposed to the (power
On 2013-03-20 14:59, Alexandre Arbey wrote:
> I am using Debian on a Macbook Pro. The computer is going to sleep
> correctly,
> but after resume, the Xorg server crashes and restarts. After the server
> restart, everything works correctly. This behaviour only happens with
> nvidia-
> glx > 295.59.
On 2013-05-23 10:58, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2013-05-23 00:36, Marco Righi wrote:
>> The DraftSight CAD program soes not show the curor using nvidia drivers.
>> I have not problem with my ACER 6292 (Intel video card).
>>
>> Please write me if I can help you.
>
On 2013-02-12 04:08, Dan Brown wrote:
> Package: libgl1-nvidia-glx
> Version: 304.64-4
> I have a 3 monitor system using the DVI and VGA outputs of a ASUS M2A-VM
> motherboard with a ATI Radeon RS690(X1200) video chipset
> and the DVI output of an NVidia GEForce GT218 (8400 GS) PCIex16 video card
On 2013-09-26 11:04, Luigi Cirillo wrote:
> Package: nvidia-kernel-dkms
> Version: 304.88-1+deb7u1
> I am going crazy to install Debian on Acer Aspire 7720G.
> The problem is the Nvidia GPU.
> I followed this guide https://wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers and it
> does not work "Nvidia Segmen
On 2012-12-12 19:44, hetas wrote:
> Thanks to some forum discussions I've found out that refresh rate can be
> changed with these newer drivers using xrandr --mode option. For example
>
> xrandr --output HDMI-0 --mode 1920x1080 --rate 24
>
> works for me. That's decent enough workaround for m
On 2013-10-20 02:05, Adam Borowski wrote:
>> libgl1-nvidia-glx postinst should display a debconf note about a
>> mismatch of the loaded kernel module and the driver being installed ...
>>
>> if it's a debconf problem, the next time you run into it, try
>>
>> export DEBCONF_DEBUG=developer
>> dpkg -
Package: libgdcm2.4
Version: 2.4.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid' to 'experimental'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'experimental' fails
because it tries to
Control: severity -1 serious
On Tuesday, 22. October 2013 11:24:48 Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Package: mjpegtools
> Version: 1:2.1.0+debian-2
> Selecting previously unselected package libmjpegutils-2.1-0.
> (Reading database ... 378470 files and directories currently installed.)
> Unpacking libm
Package: quantum-plugin-linuxbridge-agent,quantum-plugin-openvswitch-agent
Version: 2013.2-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
after the database issues have been resolved, the next problemset
appears: the transitional packages are not installable in sid (t
Package: firebird2.5-super
Version: 2.5.2.26540.ds4-7
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/d
On 2013-10-24 02:32, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 04:57:44PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> debconf-get-selections | grep nvidia
>> debconf-show nvidia-support
>
> Neither shows any output.
reinstall nvidia-support to restore the debconf cache
&
Package: php5-svn
Version: 1.0.2-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install,
remove (but not purge), and install again.
Before the second installation the package is in config-files-remaining
sta
Package: trove-guestagent
Version: 2013.2~rc1-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
Package: spacefm-common
Version: 0.9.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: affects -1 + spacefm-gtk3
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
On Monday, 12. August 2013 05:42:12 Drew Parsons wrote:
> Package: nvidia-driver
> Version: 325.15-1
> But it fails to work satisfactorily in the sense that windows (under
> Gnome 3) are not repainted. For instance from the command line (gnome
> terminal), if you type a command in, the stdout (bo
Package: python-txlibravatar
Version: 1.1-5
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to overwrite o
Package: ceph-fs-common,ceph-mds
Version: 0.67.3-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to over
Package: lmdb-doc
Version: 0.9.9-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to overwrite other pack
Package: dolibarr
Version: 3.3.4-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
>From the at
Package: apt-cacher-ng
Version: 0.7.19-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to purge.
According to policy 7.2 you cannot rely on the depends being available
during purge, only the essential packages
Hi Ben,
On Wednesday, 25. September 2013 06:42:06 Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Further, any level of dependency (Depends, Recommends or Suggests) on
> > 'linux-image' prevents APT auto-removing any of the packages that
> > provide it, making any use of the virtual package actually harmful.
>
> I opene
Package: pnopaste
Version: 1.5-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
This was obser
Package: redmine
Version: 2.3.3-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: affects -1 + redmine-mysql
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a releas
Package: icinga-cgi
Version: 1.10.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: affects -1 + icinga
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release,
Package: liblttng-ust2
Version: 2.3.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: affects -1 + liblttng-ust-dev
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fa
On 2013-10-25 18:07, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> Andreas Beckmann writes:
>> In piuparts tests with fake-essential init-system-helpers I currently see
>> these leftover directories in several tests:
> I tried to reproduce this (and somewhat succeeded,
Package: otrs2
Version: 3.2.11-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install,
remove (but not purge), and install again.
Before the second installation the package is in config-files-remaining
state
Package: libmono-system-windows-forms-datavisualization4.0a-cil
Version: 3.2.3+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid' to 'experimental'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the up
Followup-For: Bug #726720
The manpage needs to be moved as well:
Selecting previously unselected package coinor-libclp1.
Unpacking coinor-libclp1 (from .../coinor-libclp1_1.15.3-2_amd64.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/coinor-libclp1_1.15.3-2_amd64.deb (--unpack):
Package: apt-clone
Version: 0.3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
apt-clone in experimental depends on the no longer available python3.2,
a plain rebuild is sufficient to fix this, but a binNMU cannot be done
for an Arch: all package.
Andreas
--
To UNS
Package: telepathy-phoenix
Version: 0.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
telepathy-phoenix no longer builds in sid or experimental:
dh_auto_build
make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/telepathy-phoenix-
Followup-For: Bug #728158
Hi,
problem is still present:
Preparing to replace spacefm-common 0.8.7-3 (using
.../spacefm-common_0.9.0-2_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement spacefm-common ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/spacefm-common_0.9.0-2_all.deb
(--unpack):
trying
Followup-For: Bug #688977
Hi,
the problem still exists or re-appeared after an upgrade from testing to
sid:
0m45.6s ERROR: FAIL: Installed diversions (dpkg-divert) not removed by purge:
diversion of /usr/lib/libunwind-setjmp.so.0 to
/usr/lib/libunwind-setjmp.so.0.old by libunwind-setjmp0
di
On 2014-01-07 01:04, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> The ${fglrx} and ${fglrx:legacy} substitutions in the control file
> lead to an odd lintian error:
> http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/pkg-fglrx-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org.html#fglrx-driver
Lintian bug #726589
> The package should be using a deb
On 2014-01-08 10:39, Juan Cespedes wrote:
> Hi, Andreas.
>
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 02:12:24AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>>> notfixed 723485 0.5.3-2.1
>> Bug #723485 {Done: Juan Cespedes } [ltrace] ltrace link
>> with -L/usr/lib
>> No longer marked as fixed in versions 0.5.3-2.1.
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
node-xmlhttprequest 1.6.0-1 added an explicit
B-D: nodejs
so drop the old binary packages that are useless+uninstallable on
architectures without nodejs (#725363).
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
Package: php5-lasso
Version: 2.4.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to remove.
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
Removing php5-lasso (2.4.0-1) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/php5-lass
Package: libopenni-sensor-pointclouds0,libopenni-sensor-primesense0
Version: 5.1.0.41.1-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies conffiles.
This is forbidden by the policy, see
http://www.debian.org/doc
Package: init-select
Version: 1.20140107
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
>From
Followup-For: Bug #732408
Still fails to install in a piuparts chroot:
Selecting previously unselected package pv-grub-menu.
(Reading database ... 6909 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../pv-grub-menu_1.2.1_all.deb ...
Unpacking pv-grub-menu (1.2.1) ...
S
Package: wims-moodle
Version: 4.0-10
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
>From the
Package: isc-dhcp-server
Version: 4.3.0a1-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
>Fr
Package: wine
Version: 1.6.1-12
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to overwrite other package
Package: speech-dispatcher-festival
Version: 0.8-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid' to 'experimental'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'experimental' fails
becau
Package: libhdf5-cpp-7
Version: 1.8.12-4
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: affects -1 + libhdf5-dev
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid' to 'experimental'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'e
Package: libpam-snapper
Version: 0.1.8-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies conffiles.
This is forbidden by the policy, see
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-config-files
10.7
On 2014-01-10 01:04, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 1. Januar 2014, Ivo De Decker wrote:
>> Currently, upgrade reports use the source version number of the source
>> package in the release configured as 'distro' in piuparts.conf. For
>> sid2experiment this is the version in experimental, but f
> On Mittwoch, 18. Dezember 2013, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> diff --git a/piuparts.py b/piuparts.py
>> index 9134924..4d357ea 100644
>> --- a/piuparts.py
>> +++ b/piuparts.py
>> @@ -1202,6 +1202,13 @@ class Chroot:
>> self.run(["dpkg", "-i"] + tmp_files, ignore_errors=True)
>>
Package: libapache2-mpm-itk
Version: 2.4.7-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: affects -1 + apache2-mpm-itk
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy
Package: tryton-modules-project-revenue
Version: 3.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package is no longer
installable in sid:
tryton-modules-project-revenue/i386 unsatisfiable Depends:
tryton-modu
On Wednesday, 19. June 2013 04:44:19 Stephen M. Webb wrote:
> tags 701273 + pending
> thanks
What's blocking here? This has been tagged in the BTS in June and and in GIT
in August, but there has been no upload so far ...
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debi
On 2014-01-10 15:15, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 02:49:12PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
>> per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
>>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu feel++_1:0.95.0-final-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against suitesparse 4.2.1"
Rebuilding successfully tested on amd64.
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.de
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu mothur_1.31.2+dfsg-2 . amd64 . -m "Rebuild against libopenmpi1.6"
mothur-mpi/amd64 still depends on the no longer available libopenmpi1.3
amd64 is the only architecture building mothur-m
Package: cpl-plugin-sinfo,sinfo
Version: 2.4.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Control: found -1 0.0.47-1
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
same time do not conflict by t
Package: libosmgpsmap-1.0-dev
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid' to 'experimental'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'experimental' fails
because i
Followup-For: Bug #717980
Control: found -1 1:1.4.3-1
> opendnssec (1:1.4.3-1) experimental; urgency=low
> * Add Replaces&Breaks opendnssec-auditor (<< 1.4.0~) to
>opendnssec-enforcer-* (Closes: #717980)
You forgot the epoch:
Package: opendnssec-enforcer-sqlite3
Replaces: opendnssec-audito
Package: python3-speechd
Version: 0.8-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid' to 'experimental'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'experimental' fails
because it tries
Package: rpcbind
Version: 0.2.1-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'wheezy'.
It installed fine in 'wheezy', then the upgrade to 'jessie' fails
because it tries to overwrite other pack
Package: thuban-doc
Version: 1.2.2-4
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'wheezy'.
It installed fine in 'wheezy', then the upgrade to 'jessie' fails
because it tries to overwrite other p
Source: gcc-4.9
Version: 4.9-20140109-1
Severity: serious
on amd64:
lib32stdc++6-4.8-dbg 4.8.2-12 and lib32stdc++6-4.9-dbg 4.9-20140109-1
usr/lib32/debug/libstdc++.a
usr/lib32/debug/libstdc++.so
usr/lib32/debug/libstdc++.so.6
libstdc++-4.8-doc 4.8.2-12 and libstdc++-4.9-doc 4.9-20140109-1
usr/sh
Package: cpl-plugin-xsh-doc
Version: 2.3.0+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to overw
Package: cpl-plugin-giraf-doc
Version: 2.11.1+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to ov
Package: cpl-plugin-fors-doc
Version: 4.11.12+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to ov
Package: wine
Version: 1.6.1-14
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to overwrite other package
+deb7u1) wheezy; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Rebuild with debhelper from wheezy to get rid of install-info calls in
+maintainer scripts. (Closes: #708496)
+
+ -- Andreas Beckmann Sat, 11 Jan 2014 23:12:03 +0100
+
nana (2.5-12) unstable; urgency=low
* Acknowledge NMU
edium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Rebuild with debhelper from wheezy to get rid of install-info calls in
+maintainer scripts. (Closes: #708496)
+ * Add dummy empty prerm script to allow upgrading the package after
+install-info is gone.
+
+ -- Andreas Beckmann Sat, 11 Jan 2014 23:12:03
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.21
Severity: normal
Hi,
is it only me? But whenever I see this tag:
debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature
I'm asking me "But why is checking GPG signatures such a bad idea that
lintian wants me to avoid doing it?"
Andreas
PS: this mail is intentionally not pgp sig
On 2013-12-13 01:35, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> I'm attaching my patch that switches to dpkg-maintscript-helper to do
> the dir_to_symlink conversion. It will require an updated debhelper
> (#731723) since it uses $package.mainstcript files.
which has been available for some time no
On 2014-01-12 11:56, Vincent Cheng wrote:
> Installing bumblebee-nvidia (for optimus support) also pulls in the
> proprietary nvidia packages, along with nvidia-support; during the
> installation process, the user will see a debconf prompt saying that a
> xorg.conf snippet must be used to enable th
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu evince-hwp_0.1.1-2 . amd64 . -m "Rebuild in a clean sid environment."
evince-hwp/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.37.3)
the maintainer upload was build in a mixed sid+exp
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu sofa-framework_1.0~beta4-8 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against glew 1.10"
This was missed during the glew transition, probably because the package
is not up to date on a few architectures. But l
Package: libxmlrpc-lite-perl
Version: 0.717-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package is not
installable in sid:
0m16.8s ERROR: Command failed (status=100): ['chroot',
'/tmp/piupartss/tmpBgd6tS', 'apt
On 2014-01-12 19:06, Niels Thykier wrote:
> For a package that has FTBFS on 2-3 release architectures for over 150
> days with no reaction from the maintainer and no reaction to its
> uninstallability so far, I wonder if we should not be asking its
> maintainer if they are still interested in that
Source: sofa-framework
Version: 1.0~beta4-8
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
sofa-framework FTBFS on sparc and powerpc (and ia64, but probably nobody
cares about this any more)
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=sofa-fram
Package: resiprocate-turn-server
Version: 1.9.0~beta10-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the s
Package: wine
Version: 1.6.2-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to overwrite other packages
Package: nginx-naxsi-ui
Version: 1.4.4-4
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'jessie'.
It installed fine in 'jessie', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails.
>From the attached log (scroll to
Hi,
all the versioned Replaces you added so far should also get a
corresponding versioned Breaks to prevent certain partial
upgrade/downgrade problems.
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@li
Followup-For: Bug #733239
Control: severity -1 serious
Same problem here, although it did not reproduce in piuparts so far. But
that may depend other packages being installed as well (for the
diversions to take place) while piuparts does minimal setups usually.
Bumping severity since upgrades fro
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu libdogleg_0.08-2 . amd64 . -m "Rebuild in a current sid environment."
Maintainer upload was built against an old suitesparse.
@Dima: Please update your build environment.
Andreas
--
On 2014-01-13 16:16, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hmm, I guess it depends on the amount of packages affected, if it's
> few I don't think I would mind, but if we were talking about say 20+
> then maybe we should look into something else.
in wheezy, not in jessie, in sid
(fixable in jessie or wheezy-pu)
Source: nvidia-graphics-drivers
Severity: serious
Tags: security
Control: fixed -1 319.72-1,331.20-1
Quoting from
http://nvidia.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/3377
Vulnerability Description:
An NVIDIA graphics driver bug allows unprivileged user-mode software to
access the GPU inappropriat
On 2014-01-15 11:01, Karsten Malcher wrote:
> Package: nvidia-driver
> Version: 319.76-1
> Severity: important
>
> Hello,
>
> again i tried to upgrade from a perfect running installation of Debian
> wheezy to jessie.
That should be supported :-)
> This installation has been upgraded more than on
On 2014-01-15 13:46, Karsten Malcher wrote:
> There are really to many types of NVidia-cards out there.
> Is there a way to easy find out which package must be installed for an
> NVidia card?
run nvidia-detect from the nvidia-detect package
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-
Control: tag -1 pending
On 2014-01-15 13:51, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Package: libthrust-dev
> Architecture: all
> Multi-Arch: allowed
fixed in SVN long ago to become
> Package: libthrust-dev
> Architecture: all
> Multi-Arch: foreign
> Are you sure this Multi-Arch: is intentional one?
>
> It does n
On 2014-01-14 14:05, Vincent Cheng wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 4:15 AM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> Or can we somehow detect Optimus systems and show an entirely different
>> template there?
>
> Ack, probably a better idea than just assuming the user knows how to
> d
debian/control (revision 4631)
@@ -5,8 +5,8 @@
Uploaders:
Russ Allbery ,
Andreas Beckmann ,
-Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-nvidia/packages/nvidia-graphics-drivers/trunk
-Vcs-Browser: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-nvidia/packages/nvidia-graphics-drivers/
+Vcs-Svn: svn://anonscm.debian.o
Control: retitle -1 ITP: povray -- persistence of vision raytracer (3D renderer)
Control: owner -1 !
On Saturday, 16. November 2013 21:13:37 Logan Rosen wrote:
> * Package name: povray
> Version : 3.7.00
Looks like I (or rather a colleague of mine) will need this, so I'm
resurrecti
Package: ruby-hoe
Version: 3.8.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package is no longer
installable in sid:
0m16.1s DEBUG: Starting command: ['chroot', '/tmp/piupartss/tmpWTr6TG',
'apt-get', '-y', 'in
Package: ifenslave
Version: 2.2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: affects -1 + ifenslave-2.6
Hi,
the transitional package ifenslave-2.6 is currently uninstallable in
sid.
To make the transition to ifenslave work properly, do the following
things:
* b
Control: severity -1 important
Control: block -1 with 729343
Control: affects -1 + altree
On Sunday, 10. November 2013 14:23:49 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
> 'wheezy'.
> It installed fine in 'wheezy&#x
On Tuesday, 12. November 2013 01:54:21 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> The recent binNMU against perl 5.18 has created empty packages (there
The buildlog contains this:
debian/rules build
dh build
dh_testdir
dh_auto_configure
### Cannot find hdf5 library, libhdf5.so or libhdf
Package: pdl
Version: 1:2.007-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi,
pdl FTBFS with testsuite failures on several architectures (are they all
big-endian architectures?):
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=pdl&arch=mips&v
401 - 500 of 15613 matches
Mail list logo
