Allow me to stick my two cents in, as the person currently
representing the SeaMonkey community unofficially.
Wherever you post patches that alter the SeaMonkey code, I'd like to
at least read them and offer feedback. I'm obviously not in a
position to reject a patch, but if changes are being ma
On 9/8/06, Hendrik-Jan Heins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This version of Seamonkey runs entirely on xulrunner.
Two comments (without having run it) :
(1) SM 1.0.x from mozilla.org isn't designed for XULRunner.
(2) There is a project to make SM trunk run on XULRunner. It's called
"suiterunner",
http://djst.org/blog/2006/09/27/the-name-firefox-not-allowed-in-ubuntu/
I think we'd be well-advised to pay attention to this. To my
knowledge, no one involved in the SeaMonkey packaging effort is
replacing logos, but we should be aware of what the debate is about.
--
"The first step in confirm
http://djst.org/blog/2006/09/27/the-name-firefox-not-allowed-in-ubuntu/
I think we'd be well-advised to pay attention to this. To my
knowledge, no one involved in the SeaMonkey packaging effort is
replacing logos, but we should be aware of what the debate is about.
--
"The first step in confirm
I build SeaMonkey on a regular basis, and I'm currently running
Kanotix. If you want me to provide an official SM 1.0.x build for
Debian, and to own the process for providing future releases, I'm
game.
I'm currently compiling SM 1.0.1 now, using the official Linux
tinderbox ("hoshi") mozconfig.
Seamonkey packaging should be simpler because mozilla-dev (and probably
all other -dev packages) should be dropped, as other packages will use
xulrunner.
That doesn't apply in this case, because SM1.0.x is based on the same
code as Firefox 1.5.0.x, and neither will be ported over to XULRunner
on
h the packaging process.
On 6/3/06, David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alex Vincent wrote:
> I've got good news. I just saved 15% on my suite release estimates. :-)
>
> SeaMonkey 1.0.2 has been released. I'll compile an opt build tonight
> on my Debian s
All right, I am going to be in over my head on this, and I know that
up front. I'd like to see if we can rally people together on the
weekend of 10 June-11 June (Pacific time zone), on freenode's #mozilla
channel. Debian packaging experience most badly wanted.
This is the earliest time I can ma
You won't get any objection from me. I just want to see it happen.
I'm crazy enough to try doing it, but I will take a back seat to an
expert with pleasure.
On 6/6/06, David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alex Vincent wrote:
> Sorry, I'm not at my Linux desktop
We need to wait for SeaMonkey 1.0.2 to be released first. I don't
want to start work with something that hasn't been endorsed yet by the
SeaMonkey Council, and SM 1.0.1 wouldn't build for Debian.
When will this happen?
It's not set in stone. SM 1.0.2 is in release candidate phase now; as
I understand it, it will be released at approximately the same time as
Firefox 1.5.0.4.
I've got good news. I just saved 15% on my suite release estimates. :-)
SeaMonkey 1.0.2 has been released. I'll compile an opt build tonight
on my Debian system.
On 5/29/06, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Alex Vincent" <[EMAIL PROTE
There has. A gentleman from Linspire contacted me over the weekend
and indicated he could do the packaging of SeaMonkey. I'm trying to
assist him from afar (meaning by e-mail), but I don't know his
schedule - or if he's watching this bug. (I think he is.)
On 7/20/06, Eike Sauer <[EMAIL PROTECT
13 matches
Mail list logo
