- tool to generate a set of .svg files out of a
> > single .svg file
>
> > It has been closed by Adrian Bunk .
> >> Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 08:51:55 +0200
> >> From: Adrian Bunk
> >> To: 544071-d...@bugs.debian.org
> >> Subject: Closing this RF
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:30:11PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 18 December 2013 at 20:20, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> | This is a headsup that Aurelien is working on getting openjdk-7 on
> | mips/mipsel, which might also resolve these two issues in rjava.
>
> Cool -- and
forcemerge 555384 604608
thanks
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To
tags 604399 +fixed-upstream
thanks
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 11:02:23PM +0100, Petr Gajdůšek wrote:
> Package: liferea
> Version: 1.6.4-1
> Severity: minor
>
> Hi,
Hi Petr,
> If I change gnome panel background color/transparency, icon
> background does not reflect this.
thanks for your bug repor
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:56:42AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>...
> All packages should support
> smooth upgrades from wheezy to jessie, including upgrades done on a
> system booted with sysvinit.
>...
This sounds like a statement by the TC that smooth upgrades from wheezy
to jessie
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:35:11AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Adrian Bunk writes:
> > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:56:42AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> >>...
> >> All packages should support
> >> smooth upgrades from wheezy to jessie, including up
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 06:09:38PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I must admit that I only followed this part of the discussion from a
> distance.
>
> However, one thing really strikes me:
>
> On 12/02/14 at 14:08 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > [loose coupling]
> >
> >Software outsid
Hi,
there are currently two different ITPs for stm32flash with different
owners.
Please agree on who will actually package it (it could be one of the
owners, or both together) and then merge the ITP bugs.
Thanks
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
Hi,
there are currently two different ITPs for cppreference-doc with
different owners.
Please agree on who will actually package it (it could be one of the
owners, or both together) and then merge the ITP bugs.
Thanks
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly
Hi,
there are currently two different ITPs for light-locker with different
owners.
Please agree on who will actually package it (it could be one of the
owners, or both together) and then merge the ITP bugs.
Thanks
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
Package: bugs.debian.org
Severity: minor
<-- snip -->
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 08:15:04 +
From: Debian Bug Tracking System
To: Adrian Bunk
CC: suntong...@users.sourceforge.net, w...@debian.org
Subject: Processed (with 1 errors): Merging the two ITPs for shc
Processing commands fo
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 10:58:27AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> t
> retitle 738169 how-can-i-help: should provide a mechanism to hide some types
> of opportunities
> thanks
>
> On 08/02/14 at 12:27 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Package: how-can-i-help
> > V
Hi Ryan,
are there any news regarding your texi2html ITA?
If packaging 5.0 still is problematic, it would be helpful if you could
make an upload of 1.82 that changes the maintainer to you.
Thanks
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the dark
Package: mg
Version: 20110905-1.1
Severity: minor
Homepage: http://www.han.dds.nl/software/mg/
This site can no longer be reached.
Either the URL should be updated, or the Homepage field removed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscr
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 01:15:34PM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>...
> So, I fully support packaging ffmpeg as a binary package for the command
> line client at the very least, and perhaps as a necessary first step.
>...
> I suspect that the animosity I've read in this thread from people
> toward
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 12:30:26PM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 02:25:18PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > How do you plan to address the DSA veto against having both sources in
> > the archive?
> >
> > https://lists.debian.org/debian-
retitle 540583 O: apachetop -- Realtime Apache monitoring tool
noowner 540583
thanks
ITA from 2011 without an upload.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The current maintainer of binutils-m68hc1x, Arthur Loiret
,
is apparently not active anymore. Therefore, I orphan this package now.
Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
package if you will have enough time and attention to work on
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The current maintainer of gcc-m68hc1x, Arthur Loiret ,
is apparently not active anymore. Therefore, I orphan this package now.
Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it.
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The current maintainer of libtango, Arthur Loiret ,
is apparently not active anymore. Therefore, I orphan this package now.
Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it.
If
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The current maintainer of simulavr, Arthur Loiret ,
is apparently not active anymore. Therefore, I orphan this package now.
Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it.
If
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The current maintainer of spu-tools, Arthur Loiret ,
is apparently not active anymore. Therefore, I orphan this package now.
Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it.
If
block 665017 by 726910
thanks
Please close #665017 when a more recent ldc is in Debian.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 07:10:04PM -0500, Ryan Kavanagh wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 12:54:12PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > are there any news regarding your texi2html ITA?
> >
> > If packaging 5.0 still is problematic [...]
>
> texi2h
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 10:53:18AM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 08:18:20PM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>...
> > But should they decide that it will not be possible to support both
> > packages for security updates, your argumentation would clearly
> > favor ffmpeg o
Package: youtube-dl
Version: 2014.02.17-1
Severity: normal
NEWS.Debian is for describing major (incompatible) changes in a
package. The purpuse is that on larger upgrades a user can see a
short list of serious caveats that is much shorter than the long
list of changelog entries.
youtube-dl is the
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:38:17PM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>...
> On 23.02.2014 11:48, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>...
> > E.g. except for the idea of removing this pretty popular package
> > in favour of a dead fork, I don't recall any solution proposed
> > for
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 09:45:35AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>...
> If software that people want to package for Debian is deeply entangled in
> one init system (that is supported in Debian), for good or for ill,
> regardless of what one might think of the decisions made by upstream that
> created
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:51:48PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Adrian Bunk writes ("Re: Bug#727708: Init system resolution open questions"):
> > (Only as a PM since I am repeating myself.)
>
> Thanks for your mail. I think it deserves wider consideration.
>
> >
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 11:22:06AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Adrian Bunk writes:
>...
> > We are in full agreement on that.
>
> > And my point on top of that is that if the CTTE decsion would be that
> > Debian should support multiple init systems, but it does no
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 08:49:48PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Adrian Bunk writes:
> > On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 11:22:06AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> >> There is a natural process here, where rarely-used configurations
> >> slowly stop working and people even
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 11:00:01AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Adrian Bunk
>
> > I already gave my hypothetical "udev gets a hard dependency on systemd
> > as init system" worst case.
> > To make the worst case even worse, assume a new upstream versio
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 02:59:01AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Adrian Bunk writes:
> > On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 08:49:48PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>...
> > No, I am not assuming bad faith.
>
> > But there will be cases where the goals like
> > 1. give user
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 04:05:08PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Adrian Bunk
>...
> > If I was a systemd maintainer I would consider it a reasonable option to
> > rather upload a new version of systemd that adds such a dependency to
> > udev instead of shipping a
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 07:23:17PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>...
> I also have to insist that GNOME 3.10+ *needs* a working logind even for
> basic functionality,
>...
Can you elaborate on where exactly upstream GNOME 3.10 has a hard
dependency on logind, and no alternative ConsoleKit codep
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 03:23:32AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>...
> [non-essential-init] In order to allow Debian users and developers
> to easily design, test and deploy alternative init systems both now
> and in the future, no init system in Debian should be provided via an
> Essential:yes pa
Hi,
since ocaml-book is:
- orphaned since 2011 and
- in non-free and
- a small subset of what a user gets when goes to [1]
I wonder whether it actually makes sense to keep ocaml-book in non-free,
or whether it could be removed.
cu
Adrian
[1] http://caml.inria.fr/resources/doc/index.en.html
--
reassign 733531 ftp.debian.org
retitle 733531 RM: metacafe-dl -- RoQA: orphaned, not in stable
thanks
This package is a transitional package (with a compatibility symlink)
for a package that is not in stable.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
Hi Colin,
this bug (base-passwd: block from testing until all shell-fallout bugs
are fixed) is not just artificial - once all affected packages will
be fixed, base-passwd will have to add versioned Conflicts: or Breaks:
for all affected packages.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of
retitle 736605 ITA: graphviz -- rich set of graph drawing tools
owner 736605 !
thanks
Hi Christoph, hi David,
I'd like to adopt graphviz.
I'm currently in the process of returning from emeritus status.
Where is the maint git archive?
The URL in the package in unstable does no longer seem to exi
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
It is confusing that pages like
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=packa...@qa.debian.org
list whoever maintained packages also under whoever is listed in
the maintainer field in stable - that person might have given up
maintainership of the package
reassign 677789 ftp.debian.org
retitle 677789 RM: rubybook -- RoQA; orphaned, outdated
thanks
There is not much value in shipping a book from 2000 in non-free.
And if anyone actually wants to read it, it is also available
online at [1].
cu
Adrian
[1] http://ruby-doc.com/docs/ProgrammingRuby/
-
Package: apache2-bin
Version: 2.4.6-3
Severity: serious
First, I was surprised to see the many open and non-RC bugs in [1],
shouldn't packages that e.g. use /etc/apache2/conf.d/ have an RC bug
since they'll definitely have to get fixed for jessie?
Second, for supporting all possible upgrade and p
Package: boinc-client
Version: 7.2.33+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
boinc-client recommends the removed package ia32-libs.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: src:bzip2
Version: 1.0.6-5
Severity: normal
These packages seem to be pre-multiarch relicts.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:18:09AM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>...
> > == version "multiple" only ==
> >
> >2. Debian intends to support multiple init systems, for the
> > foreseeable future, and so long as their respective communities
> > and code remain healthy. Nothing outs
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 08:54:13PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> >2. Debian intends to support multiple init systems, for the
> > foreseeable future, and so long as their respective communities
> > and code remain healthy. No
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 08:40:01AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>...
> [1] That's ignoring the possibility that a non-systemd logind
> replacement with sufficient functionality for all software following
> the latest logind features might show up one day - but
>,,,
Ple
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:39:51AM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
>...
>M. Debian intends to support multiple init systems, for the
> foreseeable future, and so long as their respective communities
> and code remain healthy. Software outside of an init system's
> implementation ma
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 01:24:12PM +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le mardi 28 janvier 2014 à 08:16 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt a écrit :
> >> No. My question isn't about logind, but about using a user systemd
> >> session to supervise processe
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 09:12:54AM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> Ian Jackson writes:
>
> > I think it doesn't make sense to allow people to require a non-default
> > init.
>
> I think this position is consistent with allowing each maintainer broad
> autonomy, and not overly burdening them with r
Package: src:suphp
Version: 0.7.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: security
>From http://www.suphp.org/Home.html
suPHP 0.7.2 has been released.
This release fixes a security issue that was introduced with the 0.7.0 release.
This issue affected the source-highlighting feature and could only be
exploite
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:08:19PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jan 2014, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:23:11AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > The former. So :
> > >
> > >Where feasible, software should interoperate with non-default init
> > >
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 07:05:01PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > For anyone intending to make Debian the laughingstock of the open source
> > world, here is a good opportunity:
> >
> > Debian decides that
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:05:22AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 28 janvier 2014 à 19:34 +0200, Adrian Bunk a écrit :
> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 01:24:12PM +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > >
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:50:00PM +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
>...
> Further, in my
> experience it was *way* more stable to either go for full systemd or
> always rely on the reduced functionality. The runtime detection of "is
> systemd running as PID 1" was IMO not very stable (and that wasn't ju
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 06:41:11PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 29 janvier 2014 à 19:03 +0200, Adrian Bunk a écrit :
>...
> > Assuming jessie will support multiple init systems, why would GNOME need
> > a dependency on systemd?
>
> Because
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 07:17:29PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 29 janvier 2014 à 20:00 +0200, Adrian Bunk a écrit :
> > What *basic functionality* exactly is missing in GNOME 3.10 without logind?
> >
> > Note that I am not referring to bugs that are no
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:27:53AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Adrian Bunk writes:
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 07:17:29PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> >> Le mercredi 29 janvier 2014 à 20:00 +0200, Adrian Bunk a écrit :
>
> >>> What *basic functionality*
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 09:24:16PM +0100, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> 2014-01-29 Adrian Bunk :
> > [...]
> > I do fully acknowledge that there are issues with ConsoleKit being
> > unmaintained and many non-systemd codepath in GNOME being unmaintained
> > and with G
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 03:02:21PM +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> Le vendredi 31 janvier 2014 à 11:55 +, Neil McGovern a écrit :
> > On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 09:33:33AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > Given the Condorcet voting method is susceptible to tactical voting,
> >
> > Hi Josse
Package: cia-clients
Version: 20120903
Severity: serious
The server went down in September 2012 and is not expected to ever
come back.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi Axel,
first of all, please Cc the submitter when answering to him - the BTS
does *not* send a copy to the submitter except when you add either his
email address or -submit...@bugs.debian.org to the Cc.
http://qa.debian.org/popcon-graph.php?packages=git-arch
git suggests git-arch, and git-all
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 08:53:24PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>...
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=tla
> The latest open bug from someone actually using it seems to be #419817
> from 2007.
>...
/me is blind.
#522082 from 2009
cu
Adrian
--
"Is
severity 669356 serious
reassign 728296 ftp.debian.org
retitle 728296 RM: electricsheep -- RoQA; orphaned, RC-buggy, licence problems
thanks
electricsheep is orphaned, and it has an RC bug (#728296) that might
(or might not) be fixed by the new upstream version available.
But the real problem is
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The maintainer of tetzle has orphaned this package.
Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it.
If you want to be the new maintainer, please see
http://www.debian.org/devel
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The maintainer of acoustid-fingerprinter has orphaned this package.
Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it.
If you want to be the new maintainer, please see
http://www.
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The maintainer of cricket has orphaned this package.
Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it.
If you want to be the new maintainer, please see
http://www.debian.org/deve
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The maintainer of django-authority has orphaned this package.
Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it.
If you want to be the new maintainer, please see
http://www.debian
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The maintainer of django-pagination has orphaned this package.
Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it.
If you want to be the new maintainer, please see
http://www.debia
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The maintainer of django-notification has orphaned this package.
Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it.
If you want to be the new maintainer, please see
http://www.deb
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The maintainer of hexalate has orphaned this package.
Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it.
If you want to be the new maintainer, please see
http://www.debian.org/dev
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The maintainer of lua-augeas has orphaned this package.
Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it.
If you want to be the new maintainer, please see
http://www.debian.org/d
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The maintainer of lxctl has orphaned this package.
Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it.
If you want to be the new maintainer, please see
http://www.debian.org/devel/
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The maintainer of readline5 has orphaned this package.
Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it.
If you want to be the new maintainer, please see
http://www.debian.org/de
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The maintainer of stopwatch has orphaned this package.
Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it.
If you want to be the new maintainer, please see
http://www.debian.org/de
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The maintainer of tlslite has orphaned this package.
Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it.
If you want to be the new maintainer, please see
http://www.debian.org/deve
Hi Bdale,
shouldn't this removal request (RM: geda-gaf [armel armhf] -- RoM; NVIU)
be closed, since this seems to be a duplicate of the (not ARM specific)
#724922 (geda-gaf: FTBFS: dh_auto_test fork bombs)?
I'd expect that when this bug will be fixed or at least work-arounded
(e.g. by disabling
Package: lists.debian.org
Severity: normal
$ wget http://lists.debian.org/cgi-bin/mbox/debian-mentors-201102
--2014-02-01 23:15:30--
http://lists.debian.org/cgi-bin/mbox/debian-mentors-201102
Resolving lists.debian.org (lists.debian.org)... 82.195.75.100,
2001:41b8:202:deb:216:36ff:fe40:4002
C
On Sat, Feb 01, 2014 at 11:01:12PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat Feb 01, 2014 at 23:20:46 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Package: lists.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> >
> >
> > $ wget http://lists.debian.org/cgi-bin/mbox/debian-m
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 12:19:18AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>...
> What happened to it?
>...
Reading the next email answered it...
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many
On Sat, Feb 01, 2014 at 10:44:27PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>...
> I think L is a bad technical design, regardless of the relative merits of
> the possible init systems that we might switch to. It's effectively
> equivalent to requiring sysvinit support for all packages indefinitely,
> and if we
Hi Wesley,
upstream SVN contains:
r149 | gingold | 2012-12-11 04:45:35 +0200 (Tue, 11 Dec 2012) | 5 lines
Update to gcc 4.7
Can you check whether that might help resolving this issue?
Thanks
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 12:32:13PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Hi Wesley,
>
> upstream SVN contains:
> r149 | gingold | 2012-12-11 04:45:35 +0200 (Tue, 11 Dec 2012) | 5 lines
> Update to gcc 4.7
>
> Can you check whether that might help resolving this issue?
And as h
Package: debconf
Version: 1.5.52
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
--- dpkg-reconfigure.old2014-02-02 14:17:35.0 +0200
+++ dpkg-reconfigure2014-02-02 14:16:50.0 +0200
@@ -62,6 +62,11 @@
However, it may be useful in constrained environments where rewriting the
templates data
Package: funny-manpages
Version: 1.3-5
Severity: serious
The contents of /usr/share/doc/funny-manpages/copyright does
not at all look as if the package would be DFSG-free:
<-- snip -->
This package was debianized by Pawel Wiecek co...@pwr.wroc.pl on
Wed, 10 Dec 1997 01:10:17 +0100.
This set o
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 03:12:32PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
>
> So to summarise: for many years the perl package has provided
> /usr/bin/rename, a stanalone utility implemented in perl. The issue is we
> don't want to provide the utility from the perl package any more because
> it's been a
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 11:44:55AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Adrian Bunk writes:
>
> > No, it does not require sysvinit support for all packages indefinitely.
>
> > The current TC decision is *for jessie*.
>
> The D/U/O/V/GR options are for jessie. T and L aren&
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 07:45:19AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> Ian Jackson writes:
>
> > Yes. I would still prefer to see something like that. I don't
> > remember exactly what the objections were and I'm very very tired now
> > but perhaps something like
> >
> > We expect that Debian will c
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 03:13:06PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Bdale Garbee writes ("Bug#727708: package to change init systems"):
> > I've been trying to avoid making decisions now about what happens beyond
> > jessie, but I would not object to including that text since I think it's
> > true for a
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 10:33:17AM -0500, anarcat wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 18:52:06 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 08:17:45AM +0100, Lorenzo Sutton wrote:
> > > Agree with many on at least providing the *option* for users to have
> > > the
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 12:48:45PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2014-02-03 12:18:45, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Can you clarify whether you are sincerely asking for clarification, or
> > whether that would be pointless since you've anyway already decided that
> > ever
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 04:32:49PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2014-02-03 16:22:38, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>...
> > But if someone wants, as Lorenzo suggested, an "apt-get install ffmpeg"
> > to magically switch all applications like VLC from using libav to
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 08:13:43PM -0200, Rogério Brito wrote:
>...
> > Rogério, I would suggest you go ahead with the packaging and an upload,
> > don't let the flames fan your enthousiasm.
>
> Thanks for the encouragement, Antoine. I am mostly paralized with this
> situation and I don't really k
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 05:58:48PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2014-02-03 17:25:40, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>...
> >> Then maybe this RFP can focus on providing the ffmpeg binary again and
> >> not necessarily get into replacing libav altogether, which I think was
>
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 01:50:35AM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
>
> Hi Adrian,
Hi Axel,
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > first of all, please Cc the submitter when answering to him
>
> My answer was not to specific to the submitter but to the bug report
> and the discussion in gen
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 10:59:50AM +0100, Lorenzo Sutton wrote:
> On 03/02/2014 23:25, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>...
> I guess lots of the confusion (at least from a users' point of view)
> comes from the fact that the description of the ffmpeg package
> states:
>
> &q
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 04:15:07PM -0800, Timothy Gu wrote:
>...
> > On Feb 3, 2014 3:39 PM, "Jan Larres" wrote:
> > >
> > > On 04/02/14 12:08, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> > > > If both packages are ABI-compatible, then ffmpeg can be designed as a
> > > > drop-in replacement for libav and users will
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 07:13:57PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2014-02-03 18:21:34, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 05:58:48PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>...
> >> One of the proposals on the table is to bring back ffmpeg, at least as a
> >>
> On Feb 3, 2014 3:24 PM, "Adrian Bunk" wrote:
>
> > That is a mess, and would have to be sorted out by the Debian libav and
> > ffmpeg maintainers before such an upload could happen.
>
> Agreed. But not exactly sure whether pkg-multimedia would want to
> co
301 - 400 of 11984 matches
Mail list logo
