Source: squid
Version: 5.7-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 6.1-2
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as having a
Source: giac
Version: 1.9.0.35+dfsg2-1.1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.9.0.57+dfsg2-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1040889
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between test
Hi,
Moving to bug 1043138.
On 12-08-2023 08:14, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
Am 10.08.23 um 21:57 schrieb Paul Gevers:
There is #1043138 which was about a similar problem, seems there the
issue could be solved by re-importing the secret key. Alexis (Reply #20)
could solve his issue too by a re
Source: r-bioc-basilisk
Version: 1.12.1+ds-2
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fails-always
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails everywhere
except on amd64 and arm64. Can you please investigate the situation and
fix it (or if that's not possibl
Source: r-bioc-rhdf5
Version: 2.42.0+dfsg-1
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fails-always
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails on s390x (our
only big endian architecture). Can you please investigate the situation
and fix it? I copied some of
Source: tpm2-tss
Version: 3.2.1-3
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 4.0.1-2
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1040521
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstabl
Source: gcc-sh-elf
Version: 6
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 7
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1040960
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more
Hi,
On 12-08-2023 19:42, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
I have got old, stale, python3.10 cache files from autopkgtest on my system.
Call me innocent, but I'm not even seeing cache files on my system for
the recent python. When are these files created?
Paul
Hi,
On 12-08-2023 16:31, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
Am 12.08.23 um 15:40 schrieb Paul Gevers:
I'm trying to do that, but it's a fight.
I successfully imported my key again, and as you can see with this
message, it's both signed and sent with firefox. So I confirm that the
wo
Source: numba
Version: 0.57.1+dfsg-1
Severity: important
Hi,
It looks like something went wrong with the last upload as I don't see
mention of dropping all tests, but the last log [1] has:
Ran 0 tests in 0.000s
So no tests were run.
[1]
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/arm64/n/nu
Source: sqlalchemy
Control: found -1 sqlalchemy/2.0.31+ds1-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of sqlalchemy the autopkgtest of sqlacodegen fails
in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of
sqlalc
Source: sbcl
Version: 2:2.3.7-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2:2.4.5-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1069520
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstabl
Source: openconnect
Version: 9.12-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
removed
Source: libosmo-abis
Version: 1.3.0-2.1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
remo
Source: powder
Version: 118+dfsg1-3
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 118+dfsg1-4
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days
Source: gcc-13-cross-mipsen
Version: 2+c1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 3+c1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days
Hi,
On 08-07-2024 10:07 p.m., Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
If you think it worth enough knowing if either is the case, I can
install the backports kernel again on the arm64 hosts, but obviously
that will be annoying for us. Please let me know if I should pursue this
(I would be expecting a bit qu
Source: purity-off
Version: 0-6
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, on arm64 it recently
started to fill the entire disk with its output file in $AUTOPKGTEST_TMP
(in testing and unstable, I
Hi,
On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 22:01:32 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
I noticed that it regularly
fails.
It stopped being flaky and now always fails:
163s 1) Failure:
163s TestExampleCertExpiration#test_certs_not_expired
[/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.fbnre70j/downtmp/build.P6e/src/test
Hi Marco,
On 10-07-2024 11:23 p.m., Marco d'Itri wrote:
I am not sure of how I can investigate this, since it works fine on my
system.
You have an arm64 system? If yes, good to know it's not systematic and
apparently only happening on the ci.d.n infrastructure. It would be
interesting to fig
Package: munin
Version: 2.0.73-1
Severity: minor
Hi munin maintainers,
Thanks for maintaining munin, we use it at ci.debian.org (main node
running bookworm) to monitor our nodes. I regularly use the dynazoom
function [1] to be able to get more details. Yesterday I noticed that
the page doesn'
Source: libfishcamp
Version: 1.2+20220607003151-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.2+20220607003151-2
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1072730
Control: block -1 by 1072731
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers
Hi Marco,
On 12-07-2024 2:17 a.m., Marco d'Itri wrote:
It's a Banana Pi M5 and I cannot see how this could be
hardware-dependent.
On the ci.d.n infrastructure our nodes run bookworm and use the lxc
backend. Do you do that too?
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signat
Source: slime
Version: 2:2.28+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2:2.30+dfsg-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 d
Source: python-anyio
Version: 4.3.0-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 4.4.0-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days a
Source: dput
Version: 1.1.3
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.2.1
Tags: sid trixie pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as ha
Source: r-cran-backports
Version: 1.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.5.0-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 da
Source: freezegun
Version: 1.2.1+actually1.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.5.1-1
Tags: sid trixie pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for
Source: rust-rustls
Version: 0.21.10-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.21.12-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 day
Source: mako
Version: 1.3.2-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.3.5-1
Tags: sid trixie pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days a
Hi Ben,
On 14-07-2024 12:18 a.m., Ben Finney wrote:
Your package is only blocked because the arch:all binary package(s)
aren't built on a buildd. Unfortunately the Debian infrastructure doesn't
allow arch:all packages to be properly binNMU'ed.
What, as a package uploader (and maintainer), shou
Hi Helmut,
On 13-07-2024 11:27 p.m., Helmut Grohne wrote:
In this bug, I am asking for blessing the script-based approach by
documenting it e.g. in man 1 autopkgtest
If it already works like that, indeed, go ahead, but see below.
or providing another way to
record backend configuration via s
Hi Marco,
On 12-07-2024 2:17 a.m., Marco d'Itri wrote:
I realized that. But apparently only arm64 is broken. So it's probably a
(indirect) dependency that broke your test on arm64.
I just ran the test on stable, and there it passes. So there is
definitely something in the archive that make th
Hi,
On 13-07-2024 12:45 p.m., Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
The latest test failures
look like timeout problems and we can still address them later.
Why not do that now? Then we don't need to give you an exception without
a good reason.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
Hi Aron,
On 28-06-2024 5:44 a.m., Aron Xu wrote:
Would like to know if such steps would help resolve the issue better:
- revert to a previous version which does not have API/ABI breakage
- apply/port security patches on a best effort basis
- help upstream to check and fix API/ABI changes
Package: src:linux
Version: 6.7.12-1~bpo12+1
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org, debian-s...@lists.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: elb...@debian.org
Hi linux maintainers,
Today I restarted the s390x host of ci.d.n because I lost access. I
inspected the journal and noticed there
Source: boinc-app-eah-brp
Version: 0.20170426+dfsg-10
Severity: normal
Hi,
I happen to stumble over this package as it's listed in the transition
tracker [1] (related to RC bug 949603 in your package) and noticed that
the package is not installable and has been for years (removed from
testing
Hi,
On 09-07-2024 12:23 p.m., Paul Gevers wrote:
I'll see what I can do.
For the record: I have installed the unstable kernel on one of the
workers (ci-worker-arm64-11 [1]). Let's see how it behaves.
Paul
[1]
https://ci.debian.net/munin/ci-worker-arm64-11/ci-worker-arm64-11/
Hi h01ger,
On 14-07-2024 11:47 a.m., Holger Levsen wrote:
Are you aware of recent changes in stable that might have caused the issue
in munin? Do you know workarounds?
sorry, no.
Hmm, so it's something on our side. I do see this in our apache2 error log:
[Sun Jul 14 10:04:11.645799 2024] [c
Hi,
On 14-07-2024 12:56 p.m., Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
You mentioned that the build daemons do not build “Architecture: all”
packages? Is that a temporary fault, or is it intentional?
The buildds can build "Architecture: all" packages. However, large
parts of our infrastructure and customs ar
Hi,
On 01-07-2024 11:38 a.m., Simon McVittie wrote:
If the adduser limitation cannot be fixed soon
Is this a recent problem with adduser? If not, then I think it makes
sense to work around this in autopkgtest because we want to support old
releases.
tolerate output on stderr from adduser
Hi Ben,
On 15-07-2024 1:34 a.m., Ben Finney wrote:
Are these rules and conditions and branching instructions, for when and
what to upload with a package release, explicitly and clearly laid out, in
an obvious place (not a paragraph addressing a single release in a mailing
list discussion) for an
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Andres,
On 15-07-2024 7:13 p.m., Andres Salomon wrote:
Chromium has been blocked from migrating to testing by libxml2 for
roughly two months now. There are 38 CVEs that have been fixed between
the version currently in trixie (125.0.6422.60-1) and the version in si
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Andres,
On 15-07-2024 7:13 p.m., Andres Salomon wrote:
Chromium has been blocked from migrating to testing by libxml2 for
roughly two months now. There are 38 CVEs that have been fixed between
the version currently in trixie (125.0.6422.60-1) and the version in si
Source: python-urllib3
Version: 1.26.18-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.0.7-2
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1073396
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Source: requests
Version: 2.31.0+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.32.3+dfsg-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 3
Source: rust-sequoia-ipc
Version: 0.34.1-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.35.0-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Source: php-deepcopy
Version: 1.11.1-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.12.0-1
Tags: sid trixie pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than
Source: libxml-libxslt-perl
Version: 2.002001-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.003000-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more t
Source: developers-reference
Version: 13.6
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 13.7
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days
Source: snapd
Version: 2.62-5
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.63-3
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as having
Hi,
On 17-07-2024 9:43 p.m., gregor herrmann wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 06:57:01 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and
unstable for more than 30 days as having a Release Critical bug in testing
[1]. Your package src:libxml
Source: hisat2
Version: 2.2.1-5
Severity: important
Hi,
The s390x ci.debian.net host has been crashing repeatedly the last
couple of days [1] (since 2024-07-14). After several days of debugging I
discovered that if failed when two hisat2 runs were running in parallel.
They tried to use more m
Hi,
On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 19:12:19 +0100 Bastian Germann wrote:
The package fails to build on 32 bit architectures due to a false call in
debian/rules.
Instead of making the 32 bit architectures fail this way the architectures
armel, armhf, i386
should be removed from the Architecture list.
O
Hi all,
On Sun, 14 Jul 2024 09:22:32 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
Today I restarted the s390x host of ci.d.n because I lost access.
I have been fighting with the host for several days now, and I think I
finally found the culprit. Several days ago I configured the host to do:
# panic kernel on
Hi gregor,
On 17-07-2024 11:20 p.m., gregor herrmann wrote:
So I guess I'd just wait (the new libxml-libxslt-perl version also
has no groundbreaking changes); but I might miss something which
others may add.
I think that's acceptable if only warnings are involved indeed.
I fear however that w
Source: dask.distributed
Version: 2023.12.1+ds-4
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2024.5.2+ds.1-2
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for
Source: importlib-resources
Version: 6.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 6.4.0-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Source: node-websocket
Version: 1.0.34+~cs10.0.25-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.0.35+~cs11.0.28-1
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Source: ucx
Version: 1.16.0+ds-5
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.17.0+ds-2
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: affects -1 src:openmpi
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and u
Hi all,
On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 23:06:45 +0500 Andrey Rakhmatullin
wrote:
> keeping the current outdated build is much more useful than not having
> access to Mono at all from Debian repositories.
Considering the amount of packages depending on mono, removing it from
testing is probably out of ques
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:14:32 -0600 Bdale Garbee wrote:
The info documentation isn't entirely clear on whether the expected
behavior is a notification on stdout or an error on stderr, but the
example shown certainly looks more like what the bug reporter is
expecting than what he and I are se
Hi
On 19-07-2024 10:04 a.m., Craig Small wrote:
Ideally, I'd like to push a pre-release into the Debian CI and see if
it works now. I'm not sure
there is a way of doing that.
You can upload to experimental. The upload will be tested on amd64 and
arm64 automatically (in unstable, like normal
Hi,
Sorry for being tense yesterday.
On 19-07-2024 8:12 p.m., Paul Gevers wrote:
On 19-07-2024 10:04 a.m., Craig Small wrote:
Ideally, I'd like to push a pre-release into the Debian CI and see if
it works now. I'm not sure
there is a way of doing that.
You can upload to experim
Hi Stéphane,
On 21-07-2024 6:40 a.m., Stéphane Glondu wrote:
I've scheduled tests of all OCaml packages that provide tests (there are
86 of them). I did not specify any priority, I hope that's fine.
That's fine for now. I guess you submitted via pasting the json you
created in the self-servic
Hi all,
On 14-07-2024 9:47 a.m., Paul Gevers wrote:
For the record: I have installed the unstable kernel on one of the
workers (ci-worker-arm64-11 [1]). Let's see how it behaves.
The host has been running fine so far, I have installed the current
unstable kernel on all arm64 host
Hi,
On 21-07-2024 1:14 p.m., Adrian Bunk wrote:
The proper solution would be that release team tooling automatically
schedules rebuilds and autopkgtests with the rebuilt packages for
transitions prepared in experimental.
But even with experimental that isn't always possible because there
migh
Hi Ben
On 22-07-2024 7:18 a.m., Ben Finney wrote:
Is that correct? Is that sufficient to migrate the package to
“testing”
The excuses [1] currently say"
"""
Waiting for test results or another package, or too young (no action
required now - check later)
"""
It should migrate end of today.
Source: gffread
Version: 0.12.7-4
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.12.7-6
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as h
Source: ispc
Version: 1.23.0-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.24.0-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as havi
Source: safeeyes
Version: 2.1.5-0.1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.1.9-1
Tags: sid trixie pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Source: neutron
Version: 2:24.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2:24.0.0-3
Tags: sid trixie pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than
Source: pslist
Version: 1.4.0-5
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
removed from
Source: pytango
Version: 9.5.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS
Hi,
The latest upload of pytango failed to build on the arm64 buildd. Seems
like the build is flaky as the error is about a timeout during the test.
Paul
=== FAILURES
Hi,
On Tue, 23 Jul 2024 21:38:31 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
The latest upload of pytango failed to build on the arm64 buildd. Seems
like the build is flaky as the error is about a timeout during the test.
The same seems to be visible in the autopkgtest history on ci.debian.net
for other
Hi,
On 23-07-2024 7:09 p.m., Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
ispc (1.24.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Limit architectures for migration to testing (Closes: #1076732)
Don't forget to ask for removal of the current armhf binaries. They are
not automatically removed: $(reportbug ft
Hi waldi,
On 24-07-2024 10:57 a.m., Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 08:06:46AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
However, that doesn't seem to work on our s390x host as it seems to freeze
instead. Is this something known? Something I'm doing wrong (E.g. these
options behaving d
Hi,
On 25-07-2024 13:22, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
I have built it, but in haste and error left the source-only flag from a
recent upload to NEW on so I have to wait for the queue to purge before I can
re-upload the corrected source-only batch. Worst case I make a -3.
-2 is in the archive now,
Hi,
On 28-07-2024 09:50, William Desportes wrote:
Control: forwarded -1
https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/jquery-tablesorter/-/commit/07a8ceecbae453221560f1114551289292acfede
@elbrus could this package have a version published with Closes: #1057911 ?
Sure, go ahead.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.
reassign 1076310 ftp.debian.org
retitle 1076310 RM: boinc-app-eah-brp -- RoQA; unmaintained and broken
affects 1076310 src:boinc-app-eah-brp
On Sun, 14 Jul 2024 09:32:58 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
If there are no objections in the coming two weeks, I'll reassign this
bug to the ftp.debia
Source: python-qwt
Version: 0.12.1-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.12.5-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1074168
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and uns
Source: libhdr-histogram
Version: 0.11.8-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.11.8-4
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Hi,
On Fri, 31 May 2024 08:51:58 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
The autopkgtest failure is not due to the test failing itself, but due
to the test writing to stderr, which by default is considered a test
failure. You can ignore output to stderr by marking the test with the
allow-stderr restriction
Source: libcbor
Version: 0.10.2-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS
X-Debbugs-Cc: davidp...@librem.one
Control: block 1070818 by -1
Hi,
As already noted in bug 1070818, libcbor fails to build on mips64el.
Let's have a proper bug for it.
Looking at the changelog, it seems th
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: block 1052336 by -1
On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 21:07:16 +0800 zhangdandan
wrote:
Control: Severity -1 normal
The error is the same on mips64el, which is a release architecture where
the package already built in the past. So this bug report is RC. Raising
seve
Hi,
On 28-07-2024 18:19, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libgsl27 : Depends: libgslcblas0 (= 2.7.1+dfsg-6+b1) but 2.8+dfsg-3 is to be
installed
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
There's a gsl transition ongoing [1, 2] and lib
Hi Bo,
On 16-06-2024 11:47, Bo YU wrote:
Okay, thanks for the reporting. I will work on the strace 6.9. As we
discussed with emu, Maybe we should rely more on autopkgtest to detect
kernel issues. Otherwise, the current kernel version and strace
version are the same as whack-a-mole.
Any progres
Hi Julian,
On 28-07-2024 11:10, Julian Gilbey wrote:
It's failing the autopkgtest on riscv64 quite badly. It's a new
package, and I have no idea where in the toolchain the problem lies;
given that pytest also fails on this architecture, it's probably not
pytest-jupyter itself that is problemati
Source: r-cran-backports
Version: 1.5.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of r-cran-backports the autopkgtest of
r-cran-backports fails in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the
binary packages of r-cran-ba
Control: merge -1 1071456
Control: block 1071456 by -1
Control: affects 1072004 autopkgtest
Hi
On 30-07-2024 19:08, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
Running a test with that image following instructions found at the same URL
repeatedly fails with a timeout:
This is linux kernel bug 1071456.
Paul
Hi,
On 31-07-2024 11:00, Simon McVittie wrote:
Ideally we would have a way to do (1.) *and* (2.). Perhaps
Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-pybuild could generate both tests, either always
or with some mechanism to opt-in?
A bit ugly, but something that probably works today is to have both in
the "T
Sorry for the noise of my previous mail
On 31-07-2024 11:57, Simon McVittie wrote:
It looks as though
"Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-python, autopkgtest-pkg-pybuild"
is meant to do that, but doesn't currently work (#1042717 and/or #1061620).
... indeed.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description:
Hi Niels,
On 01-08-2024 08:09, Niels Thykier wrote:
It seems to me that the emails could serve the relevant
documentation (or a link to it) and thereby hopefully reduce the
number of times the question(s) get raised.
Thanks for the idea.
I started a Wiki page [1] based on your initial text t
Hi,
On 02-08-2024 19:53, Santiago Vila wrote:
- How are binNMUs handled? Is the maintainer (me in this case) in charge
of requesting them (at appropriate times), or maybe there is some automated
procedure to trigger them?
It's documented on the wiki (linked from the transition page):
https://
Hi
On 02-08-2024 22:30, Santiago Vila wrote:
While we are at it, is the wording of this item ok?
[MTL]: Bumps all blocking bugs to RC.
Bug #1077768 is non-blocking because package is not in testing,
but now the affected package will FTBFS, so the bug also needs to be
raised to RC, which I will
Hi,
[Release Team member hat on, but I only voice my opinion as a member].
On the use of tpu:
Personally, until now I fail to see enough value of being able to
distinguish unstable and testing to give the package carrying
/etc/os-release a permanent exception via tpu.
On Debian version numbe
Hi
On 03-08-2024 11:58, Luca Boccassi wrote:
On the use of tpu:
Personally, until now I fail to see enough value of being able to
distinguish unstable and testing to give the package carrying
/etc/os-release a permanent exception via tpu.
Thanks for chiming in - assuming for a moment that it i
Hi,
On 03-08-2024 11:55, Niels Thykier wrote:
Since the non-free is entirely opt-in and you had to be very active
about opt'ing in as a admin, this seem fine. With the change to
non-free-firmware now being enabled by d-i by default, we now have
non-free-firmware packages installed by default t
Source: rocm-hipamd
Version: 5.7.1-3
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 5.7.1-4
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
Source: r-cran-tmb
Version: 1.9.11-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.9.13-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days a
1301 - 1400 of 9598 matches
Mail list logo
