[As Alioth was down the last couple of days, I am not sure if all people
on the gridengine package list have seen my comment to the bug. Therefor
resending.]
On 13-11-13 21:17, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 09-11-13 18:40, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> Wouldn't it make more sense to remove g
On 14-11-13 21:56, Paul Gevers wrote:
>>> Would you mind creating a VCS repository on Alioth (collab-maint comes
>>> to mind) to ease further QA maintenance?
>>
>> That's a good idea. I will do that.
>
> Alioth is down due to broken disk raid, so you
On 21-11-13 16:28, Graham Inggs wrote:
> I have looked, but don't think there is anything I can fix there.
Hmm, than I will leave some comments here and there.
>>> And, as you have been working on silencing lintian, why have you not
>>> tried to fix the extended-description-is-probably-too-short
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I am requesting the removal of lastfmsubmitd because of the combination
of factors:
- - lastfmsubmitd has a RC bug [1] filed since May 2013 and has been removed
from testing
* Note: the bug has an unteste
Hi Michael,
On 22-11-13 23:09, Michael Banck wrote:
> I am still happy to sponsor an upload to Debian. Last time, there were
> some reservations by the ftp-masters, but I guess those have been
> addressed?
Can you then please make sure that gridengine migrates to libmotif-dev
ASAP? From tomorrow
On 25-03-12 00:46, peter green wrote:
> Just to let you know (I should have posted this earlier) I got
> completely lost trying to fixup the assembler init code and gave up on
> my attempts. I may come back to this bug later (right now armhf is more
> important to me than kfreebsd), in the meantime
Control: tags -1 pending
On 28-11-13 09:18, Jarek Czekalski wrote:
> I see in the log above that emacs22 is involved in upgrade process of
> emacspeak 38.
As emacs22 is not in jessie (not even in oldstable =squeeze), I am
indeed going to remove support for it.
Paul
signature.asc
Description:
Package: winff
Version: 1.5.0-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch upstream
Forwarded: http://code.google.com/p/winff/issues/detail?id=204
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
This bug serves as a reminder of upstream bug 204. The fix is trivial.
line 2346 in unit1.lfm says *.* which on Lin
Control: reopen -1
On 30-11-13 11:44, Jarek Czekalski wrote:
> Although the title says about q switch removal, it should not be done in
> a plain way. Please see the original patch at [1].
Thanks for verifying.
> If q switch is removed and INITSTR is left unchanged, it results in
> running the e
Control: -1 pending
On 30-11-13 11:05, Graham Inggs wrote:
> I've pushed some commits to the git on collab-maint.
>
> I added a comment about the overridden Lintian spelling error
> warnings, rewrote the package descriptions, merged the changes I had
> made in d/control into d/control.in and rege
Hi Michael,
On 23-11-13 08:52, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On 22-11-13 23:09, Michael Banck wrote:
>> I am still happy to sponsor an upload to Debian. Last time, there were
>> some reservations by the ftp-masters, but I guess those have been
>> addressed?
&g
On 01-12-13 22:01, Michael Banck wrote:
>> Can you please let this bug know on what timescale you plan to migrate
>> gridengine to libmotif-dev? Gridengine IS now the only package holding
>> back the removal of lesstif2.
>
> Feel free to NMU the current version in the archive in order to get rid
>
otif-dev
+(Closes: #714661)
+ * Add explicite build dependency on libxft-dev (Closes: #707937)
+ * Remove libxp-dev as requirement (Closes: #623642)
+ * Specify freetype2 include directory
+ * Fix FTBFS on newer eglibc and/or GCC (Closes: #701446)
+
+ -- Paul Gevers Mon, 02 Dec 2013 21:03:
On 15-06-14 17:31, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> This is most probably similar to #714559 which had the same issue.
Yes, I agree. But interestingly enough, building liblouisutdml already
failed in gcc-4.8 while brltty (and libbluray) only now start to fail
with gcc-4.9, so something must have changed.
On 07-06-14 11:32, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 24-05-14 18:04, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Please upload to experimental so that it can go through NEW.
The upload has happened and the package was excepted. Please let us know
when we can proceed with uploading xmhtml and gra
Package: cacti
Version: 0.8.8b+dfsg-5
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch upstream pending
Justification: user security hole
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Cacti upstream's svn [1] has a fix for CVE-2014-4002. I couldn't find
any information yet elsewhere. I can only guess that
Control: tags -1 pending
On 29-06-14 19:24, David Suárez wrote:
> Relevant part (hopefully):
>> dpkg-source: error: expected ^--- in line 10 of diff
>> `flite-1.4-release/debian/patches/CVE-2014-0027_unsafe_temporary_file.patch'
>> dpkg-source: info: applying CVE-2014-0027_unsafe_temporary_file.p
Control: tags -1 pending
I finally found out how to solve this bug. The message "install: cannot
stat '*.so*': No such file or directory" is a red haring. It was also
there in the original builds. One of the problems with the build system
is that the scripts don't have a "set -e" so failures are n
On 12-04-14 13:00, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Thanks for your commits. I'm still not entirely clear on the cause of
> the FTBFS.
I am too. The trigger is relocation of units, but the build.sh is
working around the current failure of the lcl-qt4 package to provide
pre-build units. That will be fixed so
uch
that it only builds the three units if the location is pre 1.2RC, as you
want to support backports.
Paul
Description: Lazarus 1.2 moved the ideintf component
Author: Paul Gevers
Forwarded: not yet
--- a/components/build.sh
+++ b/components/build.sh
@@ -5,12 +5,23 @@
# This script run from main
On 14-04-14 16:01, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Just to be clear: we want to upload a version of doublecmd that builds
> on lazaras 1.2~rc2+dfsg-1 soon, so that it is not removed from the
> archive, then, when lazarus 1.2 is released we can clean up the build
> process, is that correct?
That is correct.
On 15-04-14 14:33, David Smith wrote:
> I'd suggest to try creating a new user account and see what happens.
I just wanted to report to this bug that I also experience this annoying
feature of a minimal sized view. However, I just checked with an other
user on this system (that never used liferea
On 15-04-14 21:11, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 15-04-14 14:33, David Smith wrote:
>> I'd suggest to try creating a new user account and see what happens.
>
> I just wanted to report to this bug that I also experience this annoying
> feature of a minimal sized view. However,
Hi Sergei,
On 14-04-14 06:39, Debian testing autoremoval watch wrote:
> emacspeak 39.0+dfsg-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2014-05-13
>
> It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
> 743100: tclx8.4: FTBFS: ./generic/tclXgeneral.c:408:10: error: 'Tcl_Interp'
> has no member
On 16-04-14 06:13, Sergei Golovan wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Sergei Golovan wrote:
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> I'll prepare an NMU to fix tclx8.4. Thank you for the reminder.
>
> Here it is. I'll upload it shortly.
Thanks for the very quick response. I also went to the upstream web-site
and
On 20-04-14 03:35, David Smith wrote:
> that's probably bad practice.
Yes, it is. (Unless it is needed to migrate setting formats, but that
usually is done by programs themselves).
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Markus,
I am looking into your proposal, but have several (mostly minor) issues.
On 15-04-14 11:43, markus.m...@gmx.de wrote:
> * Patch source/window.c to show multiple tab rows.
When is this supposed to work? I have open 18 files and still the tabs
are shown on one row, even when I make the
tag 744067 pending
thanks
Date: Wed Apr 23 21:21:05 2014 +0200
Author: Paul Gevers
Commit ID: 9fcb9b07b81c50c7011e1067f1f14cac9bb4cbb6
Commit URL:
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-cacti/cacti.git;a=commitdiff;h=9fcb9b07b81c50c7011e1067f1f14cac9bb4cbb6
Patch URL:
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-cacti
k it actually
builds and stuff. But if you are in a "hurry" feel free to use it already:
paul@wollumbin ~/a11y/trans_speech-dispatcher/mumble $ cat
debian/patches/find_new_speech-dispatcher_header_location
Description: speech-dispatcher 0.8 moved the location of the hea
Hi Éduard,
The world has turned a few times since you reported this bug.
I doubt you are still able to reproduce it, but do you know if this bug
is still valid? If not, I just want to close it as I suspect it has long
ago been fixed.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
angelog 2014-03-01 12:36:22.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+mumble (1.2.4-0.3) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Build against libspeechd-dev 0.8
+
+ -- Paul Gevers Sat, 01 Mar 2014 12:35:39 +0100
+
mumble (1.2.4-0.2) unstable; urgency=high
* Non-maintainer upload.
Hi Debian Javascript Maintainers,
Just for the record, I want to implement an update to my package Cacti
which also depends on a newer version of jquery. In my case I need 1.9.1
at least.
So I also would appreciate an update.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 24-03-14 07:41, David Smith wrote:
> Hmm.. Have you tried moving ~/.config/liferea out of the way to reset
> your configuration to the defaults and then try loading up liferea
> again?
No I haven't yet.
> On another note, I believe I've got 1.10.7-1 in the git repo all set for
> a review for
On 26-03-14 18:10, David Smith wrote:
> On 03/26/2014 04:47 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 26/03/14 08:08, David Smith wrote:
>>> On 03/25/2014 03:40 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>> On 25/03/14 21:31, Paul Gevers wrote:
>>>>>> So you
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 lazarus
Control: retitle -2 controls in lazarus/components should be marked auto
On 26-03-14 07:41, Graham Inggs wrote:
> and the problem with gifanim.pas remains. Alexander then replied as follows:
>
>> The real problem in lazarus package. Lazarus can n
On 27-03-14 07:47, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> please see http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/531588 for details.
Hi Moritz,
Thanks for the heads up, but that link is rather unclear and talks about
an old version of cacti. How is e.g. CVE-2014-2326 different than (the
already fixed) CVE-2013-5
On 27-03-14 07:47, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Package: cacti
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
Oh, do you know if this is communicated upstream? I didn't see this on
the cacti list and don't see it in the bug tracker.
Pual
signature.asc
Description: OpenP
point with CVE-2014-2327 though.
Paul Gevers.
Debian Cacti maintainer.
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742768
[2] http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/531588
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 30-03-14 01:27, Francois-Regis Vuillemin wrote:
> Description : visually-simple menu inspired by the Mac OS X Finder tree
>
> Simple Tree Menu creates a visually-simple menu inspired by the Mac OS X
> Finder tree.
> .
> It uses a straightforward HTML structure based on that is the sa
On 31-03-14 19:41, Georges Khaznadar wrote:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=743117
Oh, and this is a duplicate of http://bugs.debian.org/742734
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Add patch to find cairocanvas component fixing FTBFS (Closes: #743117)
+
+ -- Paul Gevers Tue, 01 Apr 2014 06:57:08 +0200
+
dozzaqueux (3.33-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* created a working watch file and added a script to make the new package
diff -Nru
On 26-03-14 20:15, Paul Gevers wrote:
> "Included *.lpk files in the binary packages and mark them as
> manually compiled to avoid recompiling them when used." Apparently that
> causes other side effects for build dependencies.
I confirm that NOT marking these packages as manu
ew.php?id=2433
>
> Tony Roman
> Cacti Developer
>
> On 3/28/14, 3:52 AM, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As the maintainer of Cacti in Debian, I received [1] your security
>> report [2] on Cacti yesterday. I have several questions.
>>
>> I didn&#
Control: found -1 0.8.7g-1+squeeze3
Control: found 742768 0.8.7g-1+squeeze3
On 04/03/14 21:30, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> If you fix the vulnerabilities please also make sure to include the
> CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) ids in your changelog entry.
Hi security team,
Do you consid
On 27-03-14 04:20, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Source: enigmail
> Source-Version: 2:1.6+git0.20140323-1
> Distribution: experimental
Was it really intentional to upload to experimental? Enigmail is now
listed for removal from testing because this bug is not fixed in sid.
Paul
signature.asc
D
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 05-04-14 18:10, Sebastian Mares wrote:
> I attempted to update my cacti installation from 0.8.8b+dfsg-3 to
> 0.8.8b+dfsg-4
> using apt-get upgrade and the installation failed with the subprocess
> returning
> error code 2 in cacti --configure.
Hi Sebastian,
Thanks
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Control: retitle -1 cacti: possibly erroneous postinst for lighttpd
On 06-04-14 00:54, Sebastian Mares wrote:> Hi! Not sure where to look as
dpkg.log doesn't have more than
>
> Setting up cacti (0.8.8b+dfsg-4) ...
> dbconfig-common: writing config to /etc/dbconfig-commo
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Control: tags -1 pending
Control: severity -1 serious
I just reproduced the issue. It is so trivial that I should have caught
that by mere testing with lighttpd instead of only apache2.
lighty-enable-mod returns non-zero if the module is already enabled,
triggering dpkg
On 07-04-14 19:30, Jarek Czekalski wrote:
> If there was a place to get deb files for 3.12, the rest should be easy.
http://snapshot.debian.org/
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: severity -1 normal
On 07-04-14 08:06, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> The decision to mark packages as Manually built was due to the fact that
> these are considered as provider binaries.
Clear (an I thought so). Let's call these package library packages.
> So users need to work with them in
On 07-04-14 22:53, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> I just quickly downloaded .tar.gz and .debian.tar.gz and built it
> without any issue using latest Lazarus. The only thing is that I have a
> full installation. This looks like a dependency issue in doublecmd.
>
> I'll find out what package is missing i
Package: lintian
Context:
On 21-04-14 21:51, roucaries bastien wrote:
> Could you open a lintian bug with:
> - md5sum
> - sha1
> - sha256
>
> of the previous file.
>
> I will add to not distributable list of file
paul@wollumbin $ md5sum libcpre.gcc.o
90c983b1d401c770bb28b03ad8791f9d libcpre.
On 22-04-14 20:47, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 19:17 +0200, Matthijs Kooijman wrote:
>> The file referenced is somehow detected as a binary, even though it is
>> just a text file containing licensing info and documentation. The file
>> itself is available here:
>>
>> http://vcs.o
On 26-04-14 06:53, David Smith wrote:
> If you have any other suggestions in particular, I'm all ears.
I suggest you ask on debian-l10n-engl...@lists.debian.org
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 26-04-14 12:49, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> Added, notes that you should ask to remove previous version of fpc
> from datas.debian.org
Sure, but I will do that after the current version of fpc has cleared
the NEW queue.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Could please you schedule an binNMU of Lazarus?
nmu lazarus_1.2+dfsg-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against fpc 2.6.4+dfsg-1"
Lazarus is the freepasc
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi RT,
It seems to me that lazarus needs some help to migrate to testing.
We moved a package from arch all to arch any and now migration is
blocked because some architectures are not able to build the pa
On 03-05-14 17:27, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Or did I miss something and should I do something on my side?
Actually, it should be waiting on fpc to migrate now I think of it, via
depends on fpc-abi-2.6.4. Is this maybe just not shown? And while
investigating, I notice that amd64 and powerpc have b
Package: fp-units-rtl-2.6.4
Version: 2.6.4+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Control: affects -1 lcl-units-1.2 lcl-nogui-1.2 lcl-gtk2-1.2 lcl-qt4-1.2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
The current fp-units-rtl-2.6.4 package provides fpc-abi-2.6.4+dfsg instead
of fpc-abi-2.6.4. As a consequens
On 05-05-14 04:36, David Smith wrote:
> How's this look?
Looks OK to me, but I still recommend to run it past the
debian-l10n-engl...@lists.debian.org mail list.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 06-05-14 18:52, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> I don't think it is worth to try to fix 4.1.1 as 5.0.0 is out.
Agree, although that depends on the time it takes to process 5.0.0
nicely. I am already looking into the changes that were made to see if
there are new license items to be documented. Not ea
Hi
On 05-11-12 13:38, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> I tried running festival with one of the czech voices (festival
> --language czech)
>
> That language uses characters outside of the 7bit ascii range heavily
> but any occurence of such character causes festival to say 'unknown'.
From the README fil
On 20-05-14 17:01, Milan Zamazal wrote:
> In theory, it's possible to implement the support for a given language
> in UTF-8 (some Indian languages do that), but it's cumbersome as all the
> UTF handling must be done manually, without any support from Festival.
I don't understand your remark. Why w
Package: view3dscene
Version: 3.13.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: pending
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
As already discussed [1] on the pkg-pas...@lists.alioth.debian.org e-mail list,
the
current versio
On 20-05-14 21:20, Milan Zamazal wrote:
>>>>>> "PG" == Paul Gevers writes:
>
> PG> On 20-05-14 17:01, Milan Zamazal wrote:
> >> In theory, it's possible to implement the support for a given
> >> language in UTF-8 (some In
Package: qcontrol
Version: 0.5.4-1~bpo70+1
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
I am trying to configure qcontrol to listen to the power button. I am
unsure if this is currently already working out of the box. Anyways, the
man page seems to be written before some recent (last couple of years)
changes
On 20-05-14 21:15, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> 2) However there is a real issue here as the lhelp program is not
> packaged. The lhelp is compiled but never installed and during the build
> that link is correct, but then becomes broken because the lhelp is
> cleaned.
>
> there is a components/chmhel
Control: retitle -1 fp-units should recommend their c-library headers
On 27-05-14 18:47, M Viey wrote:
> Le 27/05/2014 00:27, peter green a écrit :
>> I'll leave this bug open as it could be argued that we should be
>> depending on it.
> Ok thanks. But the package should indicate the dependence.
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: minor
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Thanks for supporting feeds for the TODO list on https://udd.debian.org/dmd/.
However, I constantly get "new" feeds because on every pull the
pubdate of ite
Package: optgeo
Version: 2.21-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Your package build depends on lazarus-ide-1.2. However, we uploaded
lazarus version 1.2.2 to the archive and you package
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Control: severity -1 normal
Hi David,
Thanks for your work on these rebuilds.
On 02-06-14 20:42, David Suárez wrote:
>> /usr/bin/make -C src clean
>> Makefile:19: *** recipe commences before first target. Stop.
>> make[1]: Entering directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»/src'
>> mak
On 02-06-14 22:18, David Suárez wrote:
> I think that the normal order of dpkg-buildpackage is to run dh_clean before
> patching the sources. So the severity would be correct for this bug.
Indeed I may have been to quick to lower it, but if this problem can not
be fixed by a patch, how to fix it?
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
Control: severity -1 serious
Sorry, I was reacting to quick. It seems like the package dropped the
patch that fixes this issue. On my (wheezy) system, make proceeds, I
assume that in sid make is more picky. Patch is trivial. I will probably
follow up tomorrow if nobody b
On 07-06-14 07:15, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> FTBFS on kfreebsd* during a binNMU as part of the transition to drop
> python3.3.
Issue seems unrelated to python3.3 transition:
/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/include/jni.h:52:20: fatal error: jni_md.h: No
such file or directory
#include "jni_md.h"
My und
On 07-06-14 09:28, Michalis Kamburelis wrote:
> Try compiling the Castle Game Engine sources with -Ur to avoid this.
This is indeed the solution that I am going to upload in several
minutes/hours, see [1].
Paul
[1]
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-pascal/castle-game-engine.git;a=commit;h=8
Control: forwarded -1 http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=12223
Control: retitle -1 [fpc]: Debian pre-compiled units shouldn't need
recompilation by reverse-dependencies
Control: tags -1 upstream wontfix
Control: severity -1 normal
If I understand the problem correctly and the link that Michal
Just to keep this bug up-to-date of the status. [Should have done that
earlier]
On 24-05-14 18:04, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Please upload to experimental so that it can go through NEW.
We found a copyright/license unclarity that we are currently
investigating (and if necessary defining the
On 09-06-14 08:30, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> That way you are just wasting other peoples time, buildd time and so on.
> If such a policy prevents broken, packages with low quality and so on from
> being uploaded I am happy with it. And to just test some binarys, you don't
> have to be an expert.
In
Package: view3dscene
Version: 3.14.0-1
Severity: minor
Just to serve as a reminder: view3dscene build-depends on
castle-game-engine-src which is currently needed, but undesirable and
should be unneeded in future versions of view3dscene.
I quote e-mail to pkg-pascal-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org (
Hi Debian Java maintainers,
May I draw your attention to bug 750811 [1]? A rebuild of brltty fails
because it can't find jni_md.h on kfreebsd* archs. See below.
On 07-06-14 08:22, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 07-06-14 07:15, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> FTBFS on kfreebsd* during a binNMU
/include/linux/jni_md.h
So, is the problem in brltty that it doesn't look in these multiarch
locations?
I am investigating the situation in a porterbox.
Paul
On 13-06-14 20:06, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Debian Java maintainers,
>
> May I draw your attention to bug 750811 [1]? A rebuild o
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 gcj-4.9-jdk
Control: retitle -2 including /usr/lib/jvm/default-java/include/jni.h
fails on kfreebsd*
Control: block -1 by -2
On 13-06-14 20:45, Paul Gevers wrote:
> I am investigating the situation in a porterbox.
I think I found the issue. In deb
On 08-05-14 12:25, Justin B Rye wrote:
> You left out the synopsis line:
>
> Description: feed aggregator for GNOME
>
> This makes me wonder exactly how GNOME-specific it is, but otherwise
> looks good.
Good point. I would say, drop the GNOME. Liferea works excellent in my
KDE environment and
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Gevers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: pasdoc
Version : 0.13.0
Upstream Author : Michalis Kamburelis
* URL : http://pasdoc.sipsolutions.net
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang
Control: tags -1 upstream
Control: severity -1 minor
Hi Shirish,
The original problem is upstream and we should indeed let upstream know
(I will do that this weekend). Lintian also complained, but I rather
spend my time first on other issues. lintian.debian.org reports more
severe issues than thi
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.22.1~bpo70+1
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I accidentily created a d/copyright file which follows the format of the
machine readable style [1] but did not have any content in the Copyright:
fields of one of the paragraphs. Lintian
On 14-05-14 08:03, David Michael Smith wrote:
> With a bit of testing I've discovered that the cause of the crash is due to a
> lack of the dbus-x11 package. According to README in the source package
> dbus-x11 isn't a runtime dependency. So either it's a bug with upstream or we
> need to change
Control: tags -1 pending
I just uploaded the pasdoc package. It will soon land in the NEW queue
[1] where it will be waiting for approval by the ftp-master(s).
When it is processed, I want to start building the documentation of cge
with this new package.
Paul
[1] https://ftp-master.debian.org/n
Control: owner -1 !
On 14-03-14 19:35, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Control: found -1 5.0-2
>
> I'm sorry to report that this is not completely fixed. The following
> files still vary with architecture:
Ar, LOCALs (I think).
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
@Mario: How do you build the packages that you upload? It seems that
your build does not use the files as they are in the tar ball, but as
they are on your locale (git) hard-drive. Can you confirm this?
If yes, should be change the way we build or do we need a different
solution for this problem?
On 15-03-14 10:43, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Paul Gevers, le Sat 15 Mar 2014 10:32:54 +0100, a écrit :
>> If yes, should be change the way we build or do we need a different
>> solution for this problem?
>
> I'd say we can simply set LC_ALL to C.
That doesn't sol
On 15-03-14 11:14, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Paul Gevers, le Sat 15 Mar 2014 11:01:14 +0100, a écrit :
>> On 15-03-14 10:43, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>>> Paul Gevers, le Sat 15 Mar 2014 10:32:54 +0100, a écrit :
>>>> If yes, should be change the way we build or do we
On 15-03-14 13:10, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Use dpkg-parsechangelog to get the date from debian/changelog, and use
> that instead?
Great idea. Will do that, together with the LC_ALL, that seems to fix
our issues.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 16-03-14 19:33, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Feel free to upload. Let us know when it's installed on all archs so we
> can schedule binNMUs.
Uploaded (all) and installed on "all -2" arches. Feel free to binNMU
when finally armel and mipsel install:
cpm
mysqmail
sbox-dtc
I want to revert a patch ap
On 17-03-14 11:50, Graham Inggs wrote:
> If this is related, I'm not sure whether it needs to be fixed in lazarus
> or doublecmd.
If I am not much mistaken, you need to fix src/doublecmd.lpi for the new
location of the units. I think line 43, but there are better experts on
this mail-list.
Paul
On 16-03-14 21:50, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> Uploaded (all) and installed on "all -2" arches. Feel free to binNMU
>> when finally armel and mipsel install:
>> cpm
>> mysqmail
>> sbox-dtc
>>
> Scheduled with a dep-wait.
And build/uploaded/installed everywhere.
>> I want to revert a patch applied in
Control: fowarded -1 j...@jlemmens.nl
I made upstream aware, he is looking in to it. He tries to use
libudisks2, but he is having difficulties implementing it. It isn't
clear to him how to mount a cdrom via the library.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 23-03-14 17:31, Christian Marillat wrote:
> David Smith writes:
>
> [...]
>
>> I created a more detailed way to reproduce the problem here:
>> https://sourceforge.net/p/liferea/bugs/1142/#f50c
>>
>> But the potential for it to always segfault on startup seems like a
>> pretty nasty bug. Even
tag -1 +pending
thanks
Hi,
We are working on it. See [1] and bug 695130 [2].
Paul
[1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/motif.git
[2] http://bugs.debian.org/bug=695130
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
On 12-12-12 22:02, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 10-12-12 10:02, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> I'd recommend uploading 4) to experimental, compile a debdiff and send
>> it our way. We may have to back down 3) or 1) once we see the debdiff, but
>
> I have just uploaded cact
101 - 200 of 9076 matches
Mail list logo
