Bug#339224: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339225: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339226: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339227: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339228: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339229: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339230: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339231: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339232: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339233: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339235: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339234: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339236: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339237: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339238: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339239: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339240: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339241: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339242: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339243: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339244: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339245: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339246: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339247: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339248: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339249: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339250: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339251: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339253: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339254: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339252: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339255: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339256: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339257: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339258: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339259: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339260: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339261: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339263: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339262: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339265: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339264: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339266: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339267: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339268: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339269: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339270: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339271: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339272: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339273: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339274: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339275: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339276: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339277: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339278: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339279: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339280: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339281: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW queue u

Bug#339443: biarch packages for libasound

2005-11-17 Thread Matthias Klose
Additional patch at http://people.ubuntu.com/patches/alsa-lib-biarch-2.diff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#339674: clean doesn't clean

2005-11-17 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: qt4-x11 Version: 4.0.1-4 trying to rebuild after a sucessful build: rm: cannot remove `tools/designer/src/plugins/tools/view3d/Makefile.Debug': No such file or directory rm: cannot remove `tools/designer/src/plugins/tools/view3d/Makefile.Release': No such file or directory rm: cannot r

Bug#339234: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-17 Thread Matthias Klose
Philipp Kern writes: > On Nov 17, 2005, at 03:22, Matthias Klose wrote: > > Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the > > archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. > > Apart of waiting for the dependencies... Do I need to

Bug#339609: [pkg-fetchmail-maint] Bug#339609: 'Server CommonName mismatch' without SSL

2005-11-17 Thread Matthias Andree
609-done (append "-done") so the bug is closed. Thank you. -- Matthias Andree -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#230405: (no subject)

2005-11-17 Thread Matthias Andree
Is hiding the password in the input really useful if it's written to the configuration in clear text? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#339255: acknowledged by developer (Bug#339255: fixed in quantlib 0.3.11-2)

2005-11-18 Thread Matthias Klose
reopen 339255 thanks Debian Bug Tracking System writes: > quantlib (0.3.11-2) unstable; urgency=low > . >* Rebuilt with new g++ for libstdc++ allocator transition (Closes: #339255) The library package was not renamed. It's no reason, that you _can_ rebuild all other packages. Partial upgrad

Bug#339271: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-18 Thread Matthias Klose
Hamish Moffatt writes: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 07:57:24AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > Package: tqsllib > > Severity: important > > > > Please do not take any action before reading > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00010.html

Bug#338676: Progress?

2005-11-18 Thread Matthias Urlichs
I'd like to help / betatest too, if I may. Sources? (I have an autobuilder set up here, so the QA thing doesn't need handholding... much.) -- Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Disclaimer: The quote was selected randomly. Really. | http://smur

Bug#339255: acknowledged by developer (Bug#339255: fixed in quantlib 0.3.11-2)

2005-11-18 Thread Matthias Klose
Dirk Eddelbuettel writes: > > severity 339255 normal > tags 339255 + wontfix > retitle 339255 "QuantLib has now been rebuilt with g++-4_4.0.2-4" > thanks > > On 18 November 2005 at 09:15, Matthias Klose wrote: > | reopen 339255 > | thanks >

Bug#339255: acknowledged by developer (Bug#339255: fixed in quantlib 0.3.11-2)

2005-11-19 Thread Matthias Klose
reopen 339255 thanks Dirk Eddelbuettel writes: > > On 18 November 2005 at 13:58, Matthias Klose wrote: > | Dirk Eddelbuettel writes: > | > > | > severity 339255 normal > | > tags 339255 + wontfix > | > retitle 339255 "QuantLib has now been rebuilt with g++-

Bug#339409: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#339409: typo in lib64z1-dev dependency)

2005-11-19 Thread Matthias Klose
Debian Bug Tracking System writes: > As far as I can tell there is no actual bug here: the lib64c-dev > provides exists in unstable and the dependency appears to do what I was > expecting it to do. yes, but you are required to depend on a real package as well, not just only on a virtual package.

Bug#335488: [Pkg-zope-developers] Re: Bug#335488: Removal request for old zope packages

2005-11-20 Thread Matthias Klose
a goal to have one 2.x and one 3.x version in etch. if 2.x can be avoided, that's ok. > > > That are separate things, and I'd like to have those orphaned bugreports > > > reassigned to ftp.debian.org so I can deal with them. > > > > I'll reassign them to ftp.debian.org. > > Thank's a lot! yeah, thanks a lot for your constructive comments! Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#339320: RM: readline4, old library

2005-11-20 Thread Matthias Klose
tags 339320 - moreinfo thanks Jeroen van Wolffelaar writes: > tags 339320 moreinfo > thanks > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 02:55:16PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > Please remove readline4, after all packages are converted to use > > readline5. > > Eh, no, they

Bug#339229: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-23 Thread Matthias Klose
> tag 339229 wontfix > tag 339257 wontfix any reason for these? please add a short rationale to the bug reports, why this is wontfix. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#339219: libstdc++ allocator change

2005-11-23 Thread Matthias Klose
tags 339219 + patch thanks http://people.ubuntu.com/patches/c2a-libsigc++-2.0.diff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#339158: libstdc++ allocator change

2005-11-23 Thread Matthias Klose
tags 339159 + patch thanks http://people.ubuntu.com/patches/c2a-cppunit.diff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#339144: libstdc++ allocator change

2005-11-23 Thread Matthias Klose
tags 339144 + patch thanks http://people.ubuntu.com/patches/c2a-aiksaurus.diff please remove the build dependency on libstdc++2.10-dev, it's not needed for anything. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#339161: libstdc++ allocator change

2005-11-23 Thread Matthias Klose
tags 339161 + patch thanks http://people.ubuntu.com/patches/c2a-enchant.diff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#339241: libstdc++ allocator change

2005-11-23 Thread Matthias Klose
tags 339241 + patch thanks http://people.ubuntu.com/patches/c2a-openexr.diff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#339211: libstdc++ allocator change

2005-11-23 Thread Matthias Klose
tags 339211 + patch thanks http://people.ubuntu.com/patches/c2a-libmusicbrainz-2.0.diff Note, that this patch drops python2.1 and python2.2 support, and add python2.4 support as well. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECT

Bug#325108: cal3d didn't change the library package name for the GCC 4.0 C++ ABI change

2005-11-23 Thread Matthias Klose
well, too late, but please add conflicts/replaces to "libcal3d10c2" as well, when you update the package. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#339212: libstdc++ allocator change

2005-11-23 Thread Matthias Klose
tags 339212 + patch thanks patch at http://people.ubuntu.com/patches/c2a-libmusicbrainz-2.1.diff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#339242: libstdc++ allocator change

2005-11-23 Thread Matthias Klose
tags 339242 + patch thanks please find a patch at http://people.ubuntu.com/patches/c2a-openh323.diff as a side note: the package doesn't correctly clean: dpkg-source: building openh323 using existing openh323_1.15.6.orig.tar.gz dpkg-source: building openh323 in openh323_1.15.6-1ubuntu1.diff.gz d

Bug#339250: libstdc++ allocator change

2005-11-23 Thread Matthias Klose
tags 339250 + patch thanks please find a patch at http://people.ubuntu.com/patches/c2a-pcre3.diff as a side note: the package doesn't clean: dpkg-source -b pcre3-6.4 dpkg-source: building pcre3 using existing pcre3_6.4.orig.tar.gz dpkg-source: building pcre3 in pcre3_6.4-1ubuntu1.diff.gz dpkg-s

Bug#339223: libstdc++ allocator change

2005-11-23 Thread Matthias Klose
tags 339223 + patch thanks please find a patch at http://people.ubuntu.com/patches/c2a-libtunepimp.diff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#339158: libstdc++ allocator change

2005-11-23 Thread Matthias Klose
tags 339158 + patch thanks please find a patch at http://people.ubuntu.com/patches/c2a-cppunit.diff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#339223: libstdc++ allocator change

2005-11-23 Thread Matthias Klose
tags 339223 + patch tags 335490 + patch thanks please find a patch at http://people.ubuntu.com/patches/c2a-pwlib.diff fixed as well the FTBFS with openssl 0.9.8. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#340572: quantlib NMU 0.3.11-2.1

2005-11-24 Thread Matthias Klose
change. +Really fixes #339255. + * Remove standard tools from build dependencies, tighten build dependency +on libboost-dev, built for the changed libstdc++ allocator. + + -- Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat, 19 Nov 2005 13:38:54 +0100 + quantlib (0.3.11-2) unstable; urgen

Bug#339443: updated biarch patch

2005-11-24 Thread Matthias Klose
patch updated, the alsa-lib-biarch-2.diff is obsolet now. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#339250: libstdc++ allocator change

2005-11-24 Thread Matthias Klose
Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= writes: > # doko, see explanation below > tag 339250 - patch > thanks > > * Matthias Klose [Wed, 23 Nov 2005 21:46:39 +0100]: > > > tags 339250 + patch > > thanks > > > please find a patch at http://people.ubuntu.com/patches/c

Bug#339250: libstdc++ allocator change

2005-11-24 Thread Matthias Klose
Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= writes: > * Matthias Klose [Thu, 24 Nov 2005 22:29:15 +0100]: > > > right, that approach looks better, although currently you have to > > rename both the package. > > I discussed it with vorlon, and we were going with the "ma

Bug#339250: NMU for pcre3, avoiding renaming of the libpcre3 library package

2005-11-25 Thread Matthias Klose
e C++ library yet. +Closes: #339250. + * debian/rules: Remove testsavedregex in clean target. + + -- Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 25 Nov 2005 07:59:14 +0100 + pcre3 (6.4-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release (Closes: 333191) diff -u pcre3-6.4/debian/libpcre3.fil

Bug#340716: missing conflict/replaces

2005-11-25 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: libginac1.3c2a Severity: serious Unpacking libginac1.3c2a (from .../libginac1.3c2a_1.3.3-2_hppa.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libginac1.3c2a_1.3.3-2_hppa.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/libginac-1.3.so.2.1.0', which is also in package libginac1.3c2

Bug#340835: sparc: /lib64/libc.so.6: unexpected reloc type 0x4f

2005-11-26 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: glibc Version: 2.3.5-8 Severity: serious makes gcc* FTBFS on sparc, 2.3.5-6 looks ok. long longval () { return (long) (sizeof (int)); } unsigned long ulongval () { return (long) (sizeof (int)); } #include #include int main () { FILE *f = fopen ("conftest.val", "w"); if (! f) e

Bug#340874: [m68k] gij-4.0: dies with sigabrt

2005-11-26 Thread Matthias Klose
ic class Test { > public static void main (String args[]) { > System.exit (0); > } } with the current state of java on m68k, it seems to be better to disable it. Any opinions? Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#340864: gcc-4.1: FTBFS on amd64: Can't find libssp.*

2005-11-26 Thread Matthias Klose
tags 340864 + pending thanks typo, already fixed in SVN Kurt Roeckx writes: > Package: gcc-4.1 > Version: 4.1ds0-0exp0 > Severity: important > > > Hi, > > Your package is failing to build on amd64 with the following error: > dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr//libssp.a not found (supposed to put it

Bug#312118: ppp: capi dont (fully) close connection on terminating due to lack of activity

2005-06-05 Thread Matthias Taube
Package: ppp Version: 2.4.3-20050321+2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After terminating due to lack of activity, capi fails to reconnect on that line. at the first connect you get capi/0: 19:53:14 thor pppd[9406]: capiplugin: connected: "" -> "01920783" outgoing 19:53:14 t

Bug#312118: ppp: capi dont (fully) close connection on terminating due to lack of activity

2005-06-05 Thread Matthias Taube
- mfg Matthias Taube -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#312118: pppd hangup/dialin problem

2005-06-05 Thread Matthias Taube
The bug was reported in the ppp BTS (http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/ppp-bugs) as #1172: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: pppd hangup/dialin problem (related to 1143,1110,1167) -- mfg Matthias Taube -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl

Bug#307685: #307685 leafnode: grouptimeout_* [group] = [days]

2005-06-06 Thread Matthias Andree
s are set properly, check gnus-read-active-file, it should be 'some or nil for instance. I'm not sure if there are other variables that cause Gnus to read the whole active file without querying groups individually. -- Matthias Andree -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wi

Bug#307685: leafnode: grouptimeout_* [group] = [days]

2005-06-07 Thread Matthias Andree
o Gnus v0.4, and the recommended setting. Not sure how this relates to Debian installations, I have none ready at the moment. I might install Sarge or Sid into Xen some day though. -- Matthias Andree -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#307685: leafnode: grouptimeout_* [group] = [days]

2005-06-07 Thread Matthias Andree
in the FILES section for the interesting.groups directory. I have added two more FAQ entries in this regard, to appear in 1.11.3. -- Matthias Andree -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >