My code has been pushed to
https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-cloudflare-apt-transport-cloudflared/
with help from Maytham. And this package is the build dependency
of Bug#1069330: ITP: golang-github-akihirosuda-apt-transport-oci:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-go/2024/04/msg0
OAuth 2.0 Scopes for Google APIs:
https://developers.google.com/identity/protocols/oauth2/scopes
Dear Sir,
Say hello to Airtel Xstream AirFiber Superfast home internet service .
Introducing Airtel Xstream AirFiber, India's first wireless home internet,
powered by 5G Plus.Discover the power of wireless connectivity and superfast
speeds with Airtel Xstream AirFiber. With built in Wi-Fi 6, th
Package: libcegui-mk2-dev
Version: 0.8.7+git20220615-5.1+b5
Severity: grave
Unsatisfied dependencies:
libcegui-mk2-dev : Depends: libxerces-c3.2 but it is not installable
It should be changed to the t64 name if it's really needed.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers
Package: gvmd
Version: 23.1.0-1+b4
Severity: grave
gvmd explicitly Depends: libgvm22. It should be changed to the t64 name if it's
really needed.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers unstable-debug
APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (500,
'
Package: ippsample
Version: 0.0~git20220607.72f89b3-1+b4
Severity: grave
ippsample explicitly Depends: libcups2. It should be changed to the t64 name if
it's really needed.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers unstable-debug
APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500,
Package: nautilus-wipe
Version: 0.4.alpha2-0.1+b4
Severity: grave
nautilus-wipe explicitly Depends: libgtk-3-0. It should be changed to the t64
name if it's really needed.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers unstable-debug
APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500,
Package: prads
Version: 0.3.3-7+b5
Severity: grave
prads explicitly Depends: libpcap0.8. It should be changed to the t64 name if
it's really needed.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers unstable-debug
APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (500,
Hi Thorsten,
Quoting mirabilos:
> (at least bookworm’s) lintian complains about…
> I: mksh source: patch-not-forwarded-upstream
> [debian/patches/typeset-p-fix.diff]
> … for patches whose DEP 3 metadata clearly state they are a
> cherry-pick or backport from upstream.
>
> Here (cherry-pick):
>
>
Package: seafile-gui
Version: 9.0.4+ds1-1+b4
Severity: grave
seafile-gui explicitly Depends: libsearpc1, libseafile0. They should be changed
to the t64 names if they are really needed.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers unstable-debug
APT policy: (500, 'unstable-de
Control: reopen -1
On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 06:57:04AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> qt5-ukui-platformtheme (1.0.8-2) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
>[Steve langasek]
>* Remove hard-coded dependencies on libqt5widgets5 and libgsettings-qt1.
> and don't hard-code dependency
Package: thunderbird
Version: 1:115.9.0-1+b1
Severity: serious
thunderbird explicitly Depends: libotr5. It should be changed to the t64 name
if it's really needed.
Note that the package is still installable because it's not built on 32-bit
time64 arches, but it still needs to be fixed so that lib
Package: libui-gxmlcpp5t64
Version: 1.4.6-1.1+b1
Severity: grave
Unsatisfied dependencies:
libui-gxmlcpp5t64 : Depends: libui-gxmlcpp5v5 (>= 1.4.3) but it is not
installable
This is because override_dh_makeshlibs generates a dep on the pre-t64 name.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixi
Package: libvdeplug-pcap
Version: 0.1.0-2+b3
Severity: grave
libvdeplug-pcap explicitly Depends: libvdeplug2, libpcap0.8. They should be
changed to the t64 names if they are really needed.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers unstable-debug
APT policy: (500, 'unstabl
Package: libxbase64-1t64
Version: 3.1.2-14.1+b2
Severity: grave
$ head -1 /var/lib/dpkg/info/libxbase64-1t64:armhf.symbols
libxbase64.so.1 libxbase64-1 #MINVER#
This makes libxbase64-bin uninstallable as it now Depends on libxbase64-1. It
would make other revdeps uninstallable too, but this packa
Hi,
Lucas Nussbaum, on 2024-03-13:
> > build/temp.linux-x86_64-cpython-311/pyrex/obitools/word/_readindex.c:6320:3:
> > error: implicit declaration of function ‘heapsort’
> > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Interesting, if I trust the Debian online manual of heapsort[1],
this is a Berke
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 2024-04-19 17:11:44 +0100, Chris Boot wrote:
> On 26/11/2023 11:36, Chris Boot wrote:
> > On 26/11/2023 10:56, Chris Boot wrote:
> > > > Any way to reduce possible breakage, or to detect and fix it
> > > > before the transition starts? Like rebuilding rdeps, or checki
I am uploading a NMU to fix this.
The debdiff is attached.diff -Nru pike8.0-8.0.1738/debian/README.Debian
pike8.0-8.0.1738/debian/README.Debian
--- pike8.0-8.0.1738/debian/README.Debian 2015-09-20 16:40:03.0
+
+++ pike8.0-8.0.1738/debian/README.Debian 2024-04-20 08:24:08.
Package: ksh93u+m
Version: 1.0.8-1
Severity: minor
The ksh93u+m package description contains
KornShell is an interactive UNIX command interpreter as well as a POSIX
^
compliant scripting language which is a superset of sh(1)
On Thursday, 18 April 2024 19:21:55 CEST you wrote:
> Source: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl
> Version: 3.004
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
> Justification: fails to build from source
This really looks like a bug with prove:
$ perl t/reorder.t
ok 1 - test re-ordered list
1..1
$ prove -l -v -
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: bbcp
Version : 14.04.14.00.1 (from cpmpiled bbcp -h)
Upstream Author : Ertuğrul Emre Ertekin (Maintainer)
* URL : https://github.com/eeertekin/bbcp
* License : LGPL-3+
Programming Lang: C++
Description :
On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 12:00:00AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
El 25/3/24 a las 20:12, Chris Lamb escribió:
Alberto Bertogli wrote:
If you know of a functional official image that I can use to try to
reproduce the problem, or recently-tested steps I can follow to get
a working qemu install, pl
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 11:29:11PM +0300, Maytham Alsudany wrote:
> +``Static-Built-Using``
> +~~
IMO this should not only state when it is to be used, but also what
it is used for and by whom. IOW who is the intended receiver. What
will they do with the info provided in this f
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Edward Betts
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: uart-devices
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : J. Nick Koston
* URL : https://github.com/bdraco/uart-devices
* License
hi all
Leaving aside the questions of dependencies of other Debian packages,
I agree that 5.2.5 looks like the most recent version that is
definitely free of any directly or indirectly authored contributions
by Jia Tan.
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/xz-utils/-/tree/v5.2.5?ref_type=tags
In the
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/zeromq/gsl/pull/52
I have created an upstream Pull Request for Yavor's work.
Please consider merging it.
Source: netgen
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Control: found -1 6.2.2401+dfsg1-1.1+b1
X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org
Dear Maintainer,
netgen fails to build on armhf.
FYI:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=netgen&arch=armhf&ver=6.2.2401%2Bdfsg1-1.1%2Bb1&stamp=1712667539&raw=0
Regard
Source: qwinff
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
Control: found -1
X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org
Dear Maintainer,
qwinff fails to build on armhel,armhf.
FYI:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=qwinff&arch=armel&ver=0.2.1%2Bgit20201215-2&stamp=1685891638&raw=0
https://buildd.debian.
Package: prometheus-node-exporter-collectors
Version: 0.0~git20230203.6f710f8-1
Ohai,
I know it's custom in Debian to auto-enable services when they are
installed, however I think that the broad variety of timers present in
the collectors package deserves a different treatment, as people usually
Source: rust-servo-freetype-sys
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Control: found -1 4.0.5-2
X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org
Dear Maintainer,
rust-servo-freetype-sys fails to build on armhf.
FYI:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=rust-servo-freetype-sys&arch=armel&ver=4.0.5-2&stamp=16888
reassign -1 ksh93u+m
found -1 1.0.4-3
found -1 1.0.8-1
tag -1 upstream
forwarded -1 https://github.com/ksh93/ksh/issues/313
I am uploading a NMU to fix this.
The debdiff is attached.diff -Nru swtpm-0.7.1/debian/changelog swtpm-0.7.1/debian/changelog
--- swtpm-0.7.1/debian/changelog2023-05-18 17:52:09.0 +
+++ swtpm-0.7.1/debian/changelog2024-04-20 10:43:03.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+sw
Control: reassign -1 ksh93u+m
Control: found -1 1.0.4-3
Control: found -1 1.0.8-1
Control: tag -1 upstream
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/ksh93/ksh/issues/313
Forgot the "Control:".
Also: note the reassign due to the package rename of ksh to ksh93u+m
in September 2021. 1.0.4-3 is the cu
Source: ruby-ethon
Version: 0.16.0-1
Tags: ftbfs
Severity: serious
The package fails to build. Log on amd64:
Ethon::Multi
.new
inits curl
with default options
allows running #perform with the default execution_mode
refuses to run #socket_action
when options not empty
I am attaching patches to update helvum and would like to upload to
Experimental.
Jonas, the Salsa repo is a little jumbled. Could you push your
pristine-tar branch? And update debian/latest to include your latest
upload?
Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha
From fd91245564f7b71a9f6e88106b425af56c15b0c1 Mon S
Package: live-build
Version: git-master
Severity: normal
Hi all,
I recently built a .deb of the current master and noticed build failures like
this:
---8<--
P: Begin copying binary includes...
/usr/lib/live/build/binary_includes: 36: cd: can't cd to config/includes.binary
E: An unex
I am uploading a NMU to fix this.
The debdiff is attached.diff -Nru ruby-ffi-libarchive-1.0.1/debian/changelog
ruby-ffi-libarchive-1.0.1/debian/changelog
--- ruby-ffi-libarchive-1.0.1/debian/changelog 2020-06-06 02:12:45.0
+
+++ ruby-ffi-libarchive-1.0.1/debian/changelog 2024-04-20
On 2024-04-19 at 15:55, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> FWIW, I'm actually preparing a security update for the two CVEs and
> for bookworm I was first planning to do a 590-2.1 reaching unstable,
> and so then 590-2.1~deb12u1 for bookworm.
>
> But if you want to override it with a NMU and pr
Thank you Ervin,
I was wondering about the possibility of a trigger that would change the
IncludeOptional to Include if the debian machine is running nginx.
Best regards,
Salil
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 at 22:18, Ervin Hegedüs wrote:
> Hi Salil,
>
> Thanks for reporting.
>
> Unfortunately this is a
On 2024-02-23 Bo YU wrote:
> Source: rnp
> Version: 0.17.0-3
> Severity: serious
> Dear Maintainer,
> The package has a ftbfs issue on my local amd64 build:
> ```
> 260/260 Test #255: cli_tests-Encryption
> .. Passed 60.86
> sec
>
Source: netavark
Version: 1.4.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: r-cran-seuratobject
Version: 5.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: strace
Version: 6.5-0.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: nncp
Version: 8.10.0-8
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: metview
Version: 5.21.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/
Source: mighttpd2
Version: 4.0.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: lua-cqueues
Version: 20200726-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: cpp-httplib
Version: 0.14.3+ds-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: font-manager
Version: 0.8.8-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> m
Source: libgweather4
Version: 4.4.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> m
Source: python-cytoolz
Version: 0.12.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: libcleri
Version: 1.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: atlas-ecmwf
Version: 0.36.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> m
Source: r-cran-tmb
Version: 1.9.10-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> m
Source: qemu
Version: 1:8.2.2+ds-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: dietlibc
Version: 0.34~cvs20160606-14
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: llvm-toolchain-17
Version: 1:17.0.6-9
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: golang-github-golang-protobuf-1-5
Version: 1.5.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant
Source: lua-sec
Version: 1.3.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: shasta
Version: 0.11.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: oxigraph
Version: 0.3.22-12
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: efibootguard
Version: 0.16-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> m
Source: python-grpc-tools
Version: 1.14.1-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: hugo
Version: 0.124.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: haskell-wai-app-file-cgi
Version: 3.1.10-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part
Source: ffmpeg
Version: 7:6.1.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc
Source: picom
Version: 10.2-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cc (Deb
Source: uhttpmock
Version: 0.10.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: sslh
Version: 1.22c-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: libxcb
Version: 1.15-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: haskell-yesod-persistent
Version: 1.6.0.8-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part
Source: zmat
Version: 0.9.9+ds.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: clanlib
Version: 1.0~svn3827-11.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: urwid
Version: 2.6.10-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: pykwalify
Version: 1.8.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: r-cran-openmx
Version: 2.21.11+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: guile-gnutls
Version: 4.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> m
Source: kiwi
Version: 9.25.22-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: nmap
Version: 7.94+git20230807.3be01efb1+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part
Source: distro-info
Version: 1.7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: haskell-yesod-auth-oauth
Version: 1.6.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part
Source: luma.core
Version: 2.4.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: haskell-wai-websockets
Version: 3.0.1.2-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part
Source: wine
Version: 9.0~repack-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc
Source: iraf-st4gem
Version: 1.0+ds-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /
Source: ruby3.1
Version: 3.1.2-8.3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: dqlite
Version: 1.16.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: halide
Version: 17.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: x11-apps
Version: 7.7+11
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> check
Source: lua-luaossl
Version: 20220711-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: kwin
Version: 4:5.27.10-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: openvswitch
Version: 3.3.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> m
Source: rust-coreutils
Version: 0.0.24-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: geary
Version: 44.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: r-cran-irlba
Version: 2.3.5.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Control: found -1 1:4.2-2
20.04.2024 15:11, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: qemu
Version: 1:8.2.2+ds-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
sbuild-build-depends
El 15/4/24 a las 22:26, Bill Allombert escribió:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 09:52:39AM +, MOESSBAUER, Felix wrote:
On Fri, 04 Aug 2023 10:44:38 + sohe4b+2fz7rb0ixc53g@cs.email wrote:
Package: base-files
Version: 12.4+deb12u1
Followup-For: Bug #1039979
Control: tags -1 patch
I attach a pat
rixie sid ftbfs
> > User: lu...@debian.org
> > Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
>
>
> > > sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy : Depends: gcc-powerpc64-linux-gnu but
> > > it is not installable
> > > E: Unable to correct problems, yo
Control: tags 1066396 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for lftp (versioned as 4.9.2-2.1) and uploaded it
to unstable. This the implements the minimal fix I sent to this bug
almost a month ago.
cu Andreas
--
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so
reassign 1069353 plantuml
severity 1068999 serious
forcemerge 1068999 1069353
thanks
Hello,
In #1069353, the bug in #1068999 caused nncp to FTBFS in sid due to this
same issue. nncp uses plantuml to build documentation as part of its
build. The full build log is at
http://qa-logs.debian.net/202
1 - 100 of 347 matches
Mail list logo
