Package: yq
Version: 3.1.0-1
Severity: serious
The current description of the yq package is rather bogus.
It appears that the debmake template was not modified.
$ apt-cache show yq | grep-dctrl -s Description-en .
Description-en: auto-generated package by debmake
This Debian binary pack
Package: git-cola
Version: 4.1.0-1
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
git-cola has not been recently updated due to Breaking Changes in its Python
build system (distutils deprecations, PEP-517/518).
https://github.com/git-cola/git-cola/issues/1231#issuecomment-1136733246
I took at stab at upd
On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 05:48:21PM -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> Package: tuxguitar
> Version: 1.5.6+dfsg1-3
> Severity: important
>
> The build system doesn't correctly build the arch-any packages when only
> the arch specific targets are invoked.
In the interest of getting the package into sha
control: severity -1 wishlist
src:android-platform-tools provides binary fastboot, and you can
easily install version 29, which is even in bullseye backports.
if you need version 30 or above, it's in experimental only.
On Mon, 03 Jan 2022 14:32:45 -0500 Scott Kitterman
wrote:
> Proposed documentation changes will be included in postfix 3.7 when it is
> released.
3.7 is in Unstable/Testing now, so this is resolved.
Scott K
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 22:25:32 -0500 Scott Kitterman
wrote:
> On Mon, 11 May 2020 13:40:28 +0200 Peter Keel wrote:
> > Package: postfix
> > Version: 3.4.10-0+deb10u1
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Tags: upstream
> >
> > Hello
> >
> > Trying to set the postfix message_size_limit to 0 (educated guess
Hi Paul,
* Paul Wise [2023-01-23 08:46]:
On Sun, 2023-01-22 at 14:09 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
pnc (0.9.4-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
[ Tzafrir Cohen ]
* Include READMEs in docs dir (Closes: #1017497)
I think this was closed by the wrong package?
I filed it against
Package: mmdebstrap
Version: 1.3.1-2
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hi Johannes,
while this is not the cause for my funny ppc64el and s390x boot
failures, I think this is worth fixing anyhow, so here we go:
When --mode=chroot wraps ldconfig, it overwrites and -r argument. As it
happens mkinitramfs
Oh! Ty! What's your personal deadline so you have time to review?
I will talk with the author, Saul. Nothing is coming up that is a
dealbreaker for 2.11, so as far as I understand it that is the one we are
going to go with. Either that or 2.10.2.
On Sat, 21 Jan 2023 at 16:47, Martin wrote:
> Hi
Source: linux
Version: 6.1.7-1
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: miguel.bernal.ma...@linux.intel.com,
jair.de.jesus.gonzalez.plascen...@intel.com
Dear Maintainer,
Please enable the Intel Uncore frequency control driver.
This driver allows control of uncore frequency limits on
supported server pla
Hi!
Would you be willing to reconsider for Bookworm?
While you do have reservations about xfce4-screensaver, the question is
not whether it's perfect, but how it fares against alternatives. And
lightm-locker is so buggy it's outright useless for a good deal of users
while reports for xfce4-screen
OK. However I would like to point out that even the version flagged as
bad works fine with the xfce desktop environment.
Stefano
On 22/01/23 20:04, Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote:
control: tag -1 unreproducible
control: severity -1 important
Am 20.01.23 um 15:21 schrieb Stefano Simonucci:
I get
Looks like a duplicate of this to me:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=985631
Seems to be a duplicate of
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=985256
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "runit":
* Package name : runit
Version : 2.1.2-53
Upstream contact : Gerrit Pape
* URL : http://smarden.org/runit/
* License : CC0-1.0, BSD-3-cl
On Mon, 2023-01-23 at 06:58 +0100, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> Sorry, I should have added more information. Upstream development of pn
> stalled and we are switching to the active pnc fork.
> Given that pn was never part of a release and the name is rather short
> and non explaining, I would jus
201 - 216 of 216 matches
Mail list logo
