Source: w3m-el
Version: 1.4.632+0.20210201.2305.54c3ccd-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: magit
Version: 3.3.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering direct
Source: haskell-hspec-discover
Version: 2.8.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian
Source: libfm-qt
Version: 0.16.0-3.2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: caffeine
Version: 2.9.10-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debian/rul
Source: shellcheck
Version: 0.8.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dh_haskell_descript
Source: epl
Version: 0.9-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory
Source: node-globby
Version: 13.1.2+~cs16.24.39-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debi
Source: djinn
Version: 2014.9.7-9
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
Source: emacs-helm-ag
Version: 0.59-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bui
Source: golang-golang-x-net
Version: 1:0.0+git20220728.c7608f3+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: hasktags
Version: 0.72.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
Source: bnfc
Version: 2.9.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
> te
Source: clojure-mode
Version: 5.10.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bu
Source: seq-el
Version: 2.23-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
> dh
Source: ecb
Version: 2.50+git20170628-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enteri
Source: yatm
Version: 0.9-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
> dh b
Source: w3m-el-snapshot
Version: 1.4.632+0.20220414.2221.89ed3cf-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (ho
Source: scalapack
Version: 2.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering di
Source: paredit-everywhere
Version: 0.4-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot deb
Source: node-katex
Version: 0.16.2+~cs6.1.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/r
Source: circe
Version: 2.11-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directo
Source: haskell-x509-util
Version: 1.6.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rule
Source: link-grammar
Version: 5.10.5~dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: En
Source: gap
Version: 4.11.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directo
Source: gnuplot-mode
Version: 1:0.7.0-2014-12-31-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make
Source: esup-el
Version: 0.7.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering dire
Source: elfeed
Version: 3.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direc
Source: emacs-ivy
Version: 0.13.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering d
Source: haskell-snap-templates
Version: 1.0.0.2-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debi
Source: dumb-jump-el
Version: 0.5.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: with-simulated-input-el
Version: 2.4+git20200216.29173588-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (h
Source: emacs-web-server
Version: 1.5.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Ente
Source: markdown-toc-el
Version: 0.1.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: ido-ubiquitous
Version: 4.14-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bi
Source: helpful-el
Version: 0.19-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
Source: ogre-1.12
Version: 1.12.10+dfsg2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Ent
Source: shut-up
Version: 0.3.3-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering dire
Source: ebib
Version: 2.38.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: cycle-quotes
Version: 0.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
Source: binutils
Version: 2.38.90.20220713-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[5]: E
Source: elisp-bug-hunter
Version: 1.3.1+repack-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debia
Source: pcre2el
Version: 1.8-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: key-chord-el
Version: 0.6-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debian/ru
Source: use-package
Version: 2.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering
Source: maint-guide
Version: 1.2.51
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering d
Source: shellia
Version: 5.7.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: node-rollup-plugin-node-polyfills
Version: 0.2.1+dfsg-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopef
Source: libqtxdg
Version: 3.6.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering dir
Source: undercover-el
Version: 0.8.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bi
Source: elisp-refs
Version: 1.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering dir
Source: package-lint-el
Version: 0.16-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules b
Source: scalable-cyrfonts
Version: 4.18
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enteri
Source: haskell-hledger-interest
Version: 1.6.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debi
Source: debian-reference
Version: 2.93
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enterin
Source: singularity-container
Version: 3.10.2+ds2-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: limesuite
Version: 20.10.0+dfsg-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Ente
Source: emacs-websocket
Version: 1.13-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules b
Source: emacspeak
Version: 53.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enterin
Source: cabal-debian
Version: 5.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binar
Control: tags -1 upstream pending
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/rasterio/rasterio/issues/2592
Thanks for reporting this issue, it's forwarded upstream and worked
around in git by marking the test as xfail.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182
Control: reassign -1 lxqt-build-tools 0.11.0-0.1
Control: affects -1 src:libfm-qt
Control: fixed -1 lxqt-build-tools/0.11.0-1
Control: close -1
On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 08:55:01AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd6
Control: reopen -1
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Hi,
It seems you're still not using ftpsync? What software are you using
instead for the mirror?
Also, connections seem to be quite slow, at least 5s and up to 40s for
me to get a single small file, in a few attempts.
Cheers,
Julien
On Sun, Sep 18
Package: libatk1.0-0
Version: 2.46.0-1
libatk1.0-0 (2.46.0-1) pulls in at-spi2-core (and
gsettings-desktop-schemas). It would be really nice if we could
opt out of at-spi2-core. at-spi2-core is very intrusive and by itself it
does not add any value.
root@brutus:~# apt-get full-upgrade --dry-run
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 libzim8 8.0.0-2
Control: retitle -2 libzim8: remove unnecessary Conflicts+Replaces
Control: submitter -2 !
On 2022-09-03 09:26:34 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2022-08-28 21:45:35 -0400, Kunal Mehta wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 8/28/22 11:18, Sebasti
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/glibc-2.35.html
On 2022-09-14 22:17:47 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gl...@lists.debian.or
Package: w3m
Version: 0.5.3+git20220429-1+b1
When opening a page in w3m that contains an element that contains
a tag, w3m will use that svg title as the page title.
An example of a page to demonstrate this problem is github.com. The
real title of github.com is "GitHub: Where the world builds s
Hi all.
I'm about to fix this bug. And I'll do NMU of this package. The attached
file is the debdiff of the NMU. I'll wait for 10 days if no other
complains about the fix. And I'll upload to delay/10 queue.
So this bug is basically because #897845 and #834472 is not fixed
properly by me prev
Hi,
I opened an issue on the upstream bug tracker:
https://github.com/progval/Limnoria/issues/1517
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Typo in my patch, it should be "if (obuf->flag & RB_HEAD)", not "if
(obuf->flag | RB_HEAD)"
Package: snapshot.debian.org
Severity: normal
Snapshot uses SHA-1 hash to refer and deduplicate files. That hash is
considered insecure and should be deprecated from snapshot.
It should be replaced by secure hash function such as SHA-256, SHA-512 or
BLAKE2.
--
Baptiste Beauplat - lyknode
sign
Julien,
We have a loading time of 580 ms on https://mirror.serverion.com/
Server is doing 12G approx of the 20G maximum. We rsync the files and generate
the file ourselves.
I will implement the ftpsync later today and send you an update.
With kind regards,
Desmond van der Winden
E-m
Package: snapshot.debian.org
Severity: normal
Having files stored into an object-like storage could improve cost and
performence over the conventional storage that snapshot is currently
using. (Currently using over 130 TB!)
Multiple componants needs to access snapshot farm. The importer, the web
Source: vcmi
Version: 0.99+dfsg+git20220621.54fab9f0-3
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer(s), josch,
vcmi build depends on libluajit-5.1-dev but that got removed on
ppc64el because it doesn't work correcty on that architecture and
noone volunteers to fix *and maintain* it on that architecture. See
Package: snapshot.debian.org
Severity: normal
Transcribing weasel suggestion from IRC:
Snapshot could use NULL value on node.last to represent the current run.
Since most files do not change between runs, that would significantly
reduce the number of UPDATE needed for an import run, speeding up t
On 2022-09-17 18:21, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
which was filed against the mirrors package:
#1019145: mirror submission for mirror.iranserver.com
It has been closed by Julien Cristau .
Their explanation is attached below along
Package: roger-router
Version: 2.2.1-1
Severity: minor
X-Debbugs-Cc: qt...@disroot.org
Dear Maintainer,
The link under External Resources > Homepage [www.tabos.org] is dead.
The current website is https://www.tabos.org/projects/rogerrouter/
On Sat, 3 Aug 2019 10:57:43 +0200 andrew glaeser
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> While my upgraded system seems OK now, I can also log in as before wit
x2go
> and see the same xfce-desktop, and I can install packages.
>
> But, big but, the stable Hugin-source PPA doe
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 2022-09-11 17:07:27 -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
>
> We are ready to do the nautilus transition now. It will have sourceful
> uploads of:
> - nautilus
> - python-nautilus
> - file-roller
> - gnome-terminal
> - gtkhash
>
> All except for gt
Package: src:linux
Version: 5.10.140-1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
X-Debbugs-Cc: no2spam...@gmx.com
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Kernel doesn't use correct sound driver for Apollo Lake cpu.
Control: severity -1 serious
We are doing the Nautilus 43 transition now.
Thank you,
Jeremy Bicha
Sean, et al,
On Sat 03 Sep 2022 22:39:18 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> On Sun 28 Aug 2022 at 07:42PM -05, Daniel Lewart wrote:
>
> > Debian FTP Master(s) and Debian DNS Team,
> >
> > "Accepted bind9 1:9.18.6-1 (source amd64 all) into unstable, unstable":
> > https://tracker.debian.org/news
Control: severity -1 important
Lowering severity to important since riscv64 is not a release
architecture yet.
Cheers
Ole
Control: severity -1 serious
Nautilus 43 has been uploaded to Unstable.
Thank you,
Jeremy Bicha
I was able to fix that bug by taking Math::BigInt and Math::BigFloat
from perl 5.36. They work seamless.
I will reassign the bug to perl-modules.
--
Klaus Ethgen http://www.ethgen.ch/
pub 4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16Klaus Ethgen
Fingerprint: 85D4 C
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.22.2
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/bin/uscan
Many upstreams have the concept of prereleases and stable releases, or
development branches and stable releases, for example:
* GTK, GLib, Flatpak, SDL, dbus: x.odd.z is a prerelease, x.even.z is stable
- ([0-9]+.[0-9
Hi,
What you just quoted was just the e-d-s part.
There's s still
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libsoup3.html
Regards,
Rene
On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 08:11:03AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> I think the right thing for putty here is for upstream to remove the
> HTML from their VCS and tarballs, then add the generation process to
> their build system and continuous integration, so that they always know
> when there are problem
Package: nextcloud-desktop
Version: 3.6.0-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
nextcloud-desktop requires qml-module-qtquick-dialogs to show its GUI since
version 3.6.0, but the package currently doesn't depend on it.
$ nextcloud --logfile - | grep -i qml
2022-09-18 13:38:45:694 [ warning ne
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi!
It seems that we've broken booting Xen PVH hosts using grub-xen-host -
see #1017944. The previous bullseye update (2.06-3~deb11u1) also
pulled the same problem into bullseye.
control: fixed -1 2.4.2-2
The URL has been fixed in 2.4.2-2.
Package: libhyperscan5
Version: 5.4.0-2
Severity: important
Preparing to unpack .../030-libhyperscan5_5.4.0-2_amd64.deb ...
Aborting installation because of missing SSSE3 extension.
dpkg: error processing archive
/tmp/apt-dpkg-install-GAUvCn/030-libhyperscan5_5.4.0-2_amd64.deb (
--unpack):
new l
Thanks to Helmut, that plan sounds really good to me!
A few little details to add (but they do not influence the suggested
upgrade procedure):
One actually has to create NEW repos for borg2 and then has the options:
- to just have the future backup archives in these new repos, or
- to "borg2 t
Source: glew
Version: 2.2.0-4
Severity: normal
Hello,
the list of symbols in debian/libglew2.2.symbols is ignored since the
soname does not match.
| dpkg-gensymbols: warning: new libraries appeared in the symbols file:
libGLEW.so.2.2
| dpkg-gensymbols: warning: some libraries disappeared in the
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 11:57:48PM +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
wrote:
> From my side, I'd be fine with the TC pausing any action on this issue and
> waiting for our mail to d-devel first. This is assuming that if there is no
> opposition to the DPKG_ROOT idea, that Steve then also
Package: apache2
Version: 2.4.54-2
After updating a debian/testing amd64 an apache based https front-end
for a local http server (non-apache) failed to work. The error log
showed lines like
[core:notice] [pid 817:tid 140108209478976] AH00052: child pid 427563
exit signal Aborted (6)
libgcc_s.so.1
Control: tags -1 pending
On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 06:21:52PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: maliit-framework
> Version: 2.2.1-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebui
Package: usrmerge
Version: 30+nmu1
Severity: serious
Justification: essential packages should not fail to install
Control: affects -1 + src:mmdebstrap
If you happen to be on an overlayfs filesystem (doesn't have to be /)
and then install usrmerge into a chroot on that filesystem (for instance
by d
Hi,
finally I was able to do some investigation related to this ticket.
The syslog-ng manpage need to be updated and I'll do that.
On the other hand, the ${localstatedir} and the ${exec_prefix} is more
like an upstream decision in how to handle things, than an actual bug.
For some reason, they d
Package: claws-mail
Version: 3.17.8-1+b1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
when using the auto-configure feature of a new account creation only
"_submission._tcp.example.net" SRV record is queried, but not
"_submissions._tcp.example.net". If example.net domain only has the
latter SR
1 - 100 of 221 matches
Mail list logo
