Control: retitle -1 ITP: pass-import -- Pass extension for importing ata from
existing password managers
Dear Hans-Christoph,
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote in December 2019:
> * Package name: pass-import
> Version : 2.6
> Upstream Author : Alexandre Pujol
> * URL : htt
Hi Lucas,
Thanks for reporting!
I've investigated this and found that the error comes from building
against a version of the package "cv_bridge" (libcv-bridge-dev) which
wasn't yet rebuilt against the latest opencv 4.5.4, but for the older
4.5.3.
Does this still qualify as a FTBFS error in mrpt?
Package: brasero
Version: 3.12.2-6
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I cannot use brasero easily to burn an AUDIO cd.
When converting mp3 to cue and then burning cue project, brasero get
stuck in an infinite loop and eventually task get killed for inactivity.
Upon inspection it seems the CUE
Hi,
On 24/10/21 at 00:23 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> I wasn't able to reproduce the FTBFS. If you look a bit more closely,
> the error is *NOT* "./conftest.c:48: undefined reference to `pow'" which
> is in fact just a warning of the configure script. The error is an test
> failur
Hi Sandro
On Sat, 23 Oct 2021 at 17:35, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> pydata-sphinx-theme 0.7.1 (which contains that fix) has just been
> uploaded to unstable
Great, thanks! I see you temporarily disabled building the docs.
Would it be possible to temporarily drop the Build-Depends on
python3-jupyter-sp
On Sat, 25 Sep 2021 22:09:53 +0200 Niels Thykier wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Jelmer Vernooij:
> > Package: debhelper
> > Version: 13.5.2
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > Dear debhelper maintainers,
> >
> > For lintian-brush, it would be really useful if it was possible to discover
> >
Package: allure
Version: 0.9.5.0-2+b1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: davide.pr...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
$ Allure
Allure: SDLCallFailed {sdlExceptionCaller = "SDL.Font.shadedGlyph", sdlFunction
= "TTF_RenderGlyph_Solid", sdlExceptionError = "Couldn't find glyph"}
it seem that the problem is
Package: gnome-software
Version: 41.0-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: davide.pr...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
in gnome-software the allure license is Proprietary code and marked as
unsafe, but this software is AGPL 3.0 and present in Debian main
Ciao
Davide
-- System Information:
Debian Relea
Source: rust-rusty-tags
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
This package currently FTBFS with:
(I)Dose_applications: --checkonly specified, consider all packages as
background packages
(I)Dose_applications: Solving...
output-version: 1.2
native-architecture: amd64
report:
-
package: sbuild-
On 2021-10-23 20:34:40 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: ffdiaporama
> Version: 2.1+dfsg-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
>
>
> Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Package: v4l-utils
Version: 1.22.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs patch
User: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: riscv64
Dear maintainer,
Since version 1.22.1-1, v4l-utils fails to build on riscv64:
| v4l2-compliance uses libv4l: yes
| v4l2-compliance-32 : no
| BPF IR
Source: rust-kmon
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
This package currently FTBFS with:
report:
-
package: sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy
version: 0.invalid.0
architecture: amd64
status: broken
reasons:
-
missing:
pkg:
package: librust-tui-dev
version: 0.9.0
Source: rust-sequoia-sqv
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
This package currently FTBFS with:
report:
-
package: sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy
version: 0.invalid.0
architecture: amd64
status: broken
reasons:
-
missing:
pkg:
package: librust-lalrpop-dev
ver
Source: rust-grcov
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
This package currently FTBFS with:
report:
-
package: sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy
version: 0.invalid.0
architecture: amd64
status: broken
reasons:
-
missing:
pkg:
package: sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy
Source: rust-process-viewer
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
This package currently FTBFS with:
native-architecture: amd64
report:
-
package: sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy
version: 0.invalid.0
architecture: amd64
status: broken
reasons:
-
missing:
pkg:
package
Source: rust-debcargo
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
This package currently FTBFS with:
report:
-
package: sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy
version: 0.invalid.0
architecture: amd64
status: broken
reasons:
-
missing:
pkg:
package: librust-cargo-dev
version:
Source: rust-dfrs
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
This package currently FTBFS with:
report:
-
package: sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy
version: 0.invalid.0
architecture: amd64
status: broken
reasons:
-
missing:
pkg:
package: sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy
Source: rust-sequoia-sop
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
This package currently FTBFS with:
package: sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy
version: 0.invalid.0
architecture: amd64
status: broken
reasons:
-
missing:
pkg:
package: librust-lalrpop-dev
version: 0.17.
Source: rust-spotify-tui
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
This package currently FTBFS with:
report:
-
package: sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy
version: 0.invalid.0
architecture: amd64
status: broken
reasons:
-
missing:
pkg:
package: librust-rspotify-dev
v
Source: rust-rusty-tags
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
This package currently FTBFS with:
(I)Dose_applications: --checkonly specified, consider all packages as
background packages
(I)Dose_applications: Solving...
output-version: 1.2
native-architecture: amd64
report:
-
package: sbuild-
Source: rust-sniffglue
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
This package currently FTBFS with:
report:
-
package: sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy
version: 0.invalid.0
architecture: amd64
status: broken
reasons:
-
missing:
pkg:
package: sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy
Source: rust-bat
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
This package currently FTBFS with:
package: sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy
version: 0.invalid.0
architecture: amd64
status: broken
reasons:
-
missing:
pkg:
package: librust-bindgen+logging-dev
version: 0.59.
Source: smplayer
Version: 21.8.0-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0] we noticed that
smplayer could not be built rep
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, Debian Perl Group
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: libobject-pad-slotattr-lazyinit-perl
Version : 0.03
Upstream Author : Paul Evans
* URL
Quack,
Interestingly we used 8.046.00-1, with 4.19.0-17 until 2021-10-21 and it
worked fine.
Then we upgraded to bullseye and the package was upgraded to 8.048.03-3.
After rebooting the host never came back until we were able to reach the
sever and debug today.
It turns out modprobe was not ab
On 2021-10-23 08:12, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote:
> Package: fakechroot
> Version: 2.20.1-1
> Severity: normal
> Control: affects -1 + jemalloc
>
> Hi,
>
> libjemalloc and fakechroot do not play well together on arm64 and
> riscv64. Faidon managed to analyze the situation. It follows w
Source: micro-httpd
Version: 20140814-2.1
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
As per (https://lintian.debian.org/sources/micro-httpd), the correct package to
Depends on for inetd-based systems is update-inetd.
The attached patch prepends it to the package dependenci
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org
firmware-crystalhd was removed since it was unusuable (#865978), but
crystalhd itself is unusable without the firmware. So let's also remove
it. See also #934242
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Description:
Package: wnpp
Owner: Andrius Merkys
Severity: wishlist
Control: block -1 by 996898 996779 996810 997050 996996
* Package name: protege
Version : 5.5.0
Upstream Author : M. Horridge, C. Nyulas, T. Redmond, T. Tudorache, J.
Vendetti
* URL : https://protege.stanford.edu
*
On 2021-10-23 19:44:49 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> I have now 'patched' the upstream setting of GSL_AGE, this results (as kindly
> analysed by Sebastian) in new sonames '26' so I prepared a new version which
> just went out to unstable.
>
> Unless I am mistaken, I need to get the release
Source: unbound
Version: 1.13.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd
Hi,
Currently unbound FTBFS on GNU/Hurd due to usage of protocol level
IPV6_TCLASS, which is not defined on GNU/Hurd. The attached patch,
services_listen_dnsport.c.diff, make this u
s/protocol level/option name/
Hi,
在 2021/10/24 下午12:13, Felix Lechner 写道:
Hi 肖盛文
Possibly. I thought I had looked into the locales question with Iñaki
Malerba from the Salsa CI Team about a year ago. If you found it, I am
going to have a party!
I hope. :-)
The messages have never been reported in any other setting. Just t
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: roehl...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear release team,
the draco library needs a transition after an ABI break due to a
refactored class in
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 2:46 AM xiao sheng wen(肖盛文) wrote:
>
> The Salsa's host system, Can ssh to it?
I do not think either one of us can.
> Install locales package is preferably in Docker image,
> /etc/default/locale and /etc/locale.gen will exist in the docker after
> install it.
For no
Hello Stephan,
> Possibly relevant:
> - Are you using X11 or Wayland?
Wayland
> - Do you have proprietary graphics drivers installed?
$ lspci -v | grep -A 10 VGA
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation HD Graphics 620
(rev 02) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
Subsystem: CLEVO/KA
Hello
Package theme-d-gnome is going to be removed from Debian. See bug #996874.
- Tommi
Lucas Nussbaum kirjoitti 23.10.2021 klo 23.21:
Source: theme-d-gnome
Version: 0.9.6-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 f
On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 09:10:26AM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 09:25:06PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Source: libvirt
> > Version: 7.6.0-1
> > Severity: wishlist
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > When feasible, there is a new upstream vers
On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 09:11:58PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: firmware-microbit-micropython
> Version: 1.0.1-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
>
>
> Re
On Sun, 2021-10-24 at 00:50 +0200, Jacob Kochems wrote:
> That is why I consider this *not* to be a bug of FF, although a bug
> in FF seems to trigger it. No user space program should be able to tank the
> system by hogging up resources.
I fully share this idea that Linux should be robust to any ki
Control: tags -1 patch fixed-upstream
Control: forwarded -1
https://github.com/SuperElastix/elastix/commit/2962fb17f18273e533355ed625e43364e1c537a7
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 04:11:52PM +, Matthias Klose wrote:
>...
> /<>/Common/Transforms/itkAdvancedCombinationTransform.h:350:52:
> error: ISO
On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 09:07:10PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: mtr
> Version: 0.94-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
That's an error in your compiler.
A printf-like function often has a string litteral specifying the
format
printf ("a = %d\n",
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sun, 2021-10-24 at 00:51 +0800, Marc Gallet wrote:
> Am I to understand that the expected path forward with what is supposed to be
> a minor update offered on oldstable is that everyone shall dump their
> databases,
> delete the data folder, rest
On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 11:18:32AM +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
wrote:
> Quoting Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues (2021-08-24 14:58:55)
> > for your convenience, I created a merge request on salsa, fixing #989567 as
> > well as #983425.
> >
> > https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-debconf/debc
Control: reassign -1 xutils-dev
Control: affects -1 knews
Control: merge 994276 -1
On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 11:18:35PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > ar clq libWidgets.a ArtText.o ArtTree.o CloseSh.o Dialogue.o FileSel.o
> > Login.o Manager.o Menu.o MenuG.o MenuKnapp.o MenuShell.o
Package: libesmtp-dev
Version: 1.1.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Missing dependency
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org
Hi
libesmtp-1.0.pc contains
Requires.private: openssl >= 1.1.0
but the libesmtp-dev binary package misses a Depends on libssl-dev
accordingly.
Accordingly:
$ pkg-config -
Control: reassign -1 xutils-dev
Control: affects -1 troffcvt
Control: merge 994276 -1
On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 11:18:52PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > ar clq libport.a ato.o dir.o fd.o lock.o mem.o
> > ar: libdeps specified more than once
> > make[3]: *** [Makefile:325: libport.a] Error 1
tro
On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 12:25:23PM +0200, jacobkoch...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello Stephan,
>
> > Possibly relevant:
> > - Are you using X11 or Wayland?
> Wayland
>
> > - Do you have proprietary graphics drivers installed?
> $ lspci -v | grep -A 10 VGA
> 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corp
Source: node-proxyquire
Version: 2.1.3+~1.0.1+~1.0.2-11
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: golang-github-mattn-go-runewidth
Version: 0.0.13-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully)
Source: r-cran-git2r
Version: 0.28.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpackag
Source: trinityrnaseq
Version: 2.11.0+dfsg-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: E
Source: pg-dirtyread
Version: 2.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering d
Source: wal2json
Version: 2.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direc
Source: pgfincore
Version: 1.2.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering di
Source: trapperkeeper-metrics-clojure
Version: 1.3.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: skimage
Version: 0.18.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering dir
Source: fava
Version: 1.18-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering director
Source: slony1-2
Version: 2.2.10-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpackage
>
Source: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.140
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enterin
Source: erlang-erlware-commons
Version: 1.3.1+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> d
Source: puppetlabs-http-client-clojure
Version: 1.2.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: repmgr
Version: 5.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpackage
> ---
Source: pushpin
Version: 1.32.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering dir
Source: trapperkeeper-status-clojure
Version: 1.1.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> m
Source: preprepare
Version: 0.9-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering dir
Source: libapache-poi-java
Version: 4.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: En
Source: glewlwyd
Version: 2.5.2-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering dir
Source: wims
Version: 2:4.22~dfsg1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: libvirt-python
Version: 7.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules b
Source: golang-github-twstrike-gotk3adapter
Version: 0.0~git20170505.0.901a95d+ds-3.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Source: postgresql-semver
Version: 0.31.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildp
Source: leaflet
Version: 1.7.1~dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: pg-partman
Version: 4.5.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering d
Source: node-agent-base
Version: 6.0.2+~cs5.4.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[
Source: node-cosmiconfig
Version: 7.0.0+ds1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: rainloop
Version: 1.14.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering di
Source: rdma-core
Version: 36.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering dir
Source: libgnatcoll-db
Version: 21.0.0-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: plr
Version: 1:8.4.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: ghdl
Version: 1.0.0+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering di
Source: trapperkeeper-webserver-jetty9-clojure
Version: 4.1.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopef
Source: libcxx-serial
Version: 1.2.1-4.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: pycryptodome
Version: 3.9.7+dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: En
Source: pg-fact-loader
Version: 1.6.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enteri
Source: moment-timezone.js
Version: 0.5.32+dfsg1-2+2021a
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: trapperkeeper-authorization-clojure
Version: 1.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefull
Package: gnome-shell
Version: 41.0-2
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@joshtriplett.org
[I don't know which component is responsible for the UI for changing
volume/brightness/etc; I guessed gnome-shell, but I don't know if it's
that, gnome-settings-daemon, or something else.]
Several times late
Source: plplot
Version: 5.15.0+dfsg-22
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Enterin
Source: ipywidgets
Version: 6.0.0-8
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering d
Source: python-pkginfo
Version: 1.4.2-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enteri
Source: listparser
Version: 0.18-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering di
Source: pyrlp
Version: 0.5.1-1.2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering dire
Source: spatial4j
Version: 0.7-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpackage
> --
Source: pt-websocket
Version: 0.2-9
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering d
Source: rdkit
Version: 202009.5-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debian/rule
Source: node-gulp-tsb
Version: 4.0.5+~cs7.0.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]
Source: fiat
Version: 2019.2.0~git20210116.0439689-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> ma
Source: mdtraj
Version: 1.9.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direc
Source: libcomps
Version: 0.1.15-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[5]: Entering di
1 - 100 of 239 matches
Mail list logo
