❦ 25 février 2021 08:38 +01, Patrick J.:
>> By any chance, maybe you did install the firmwares manually in the past,
>> so you already had a intel/sof-tplg directory which then was not
>> replaced by the symlink?
>
> Yes, indeed. I tried some manual approaches in the past before the
> firmware-so
Package is available @Salsa:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-asyncache
Package: firefox-esr
Version: 78.7.0esr-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
firefox-esr (both the latest version 78.8.0esr-1 and the latest testing
version 78.7.0esr-1) depends on libnss3 (>= 2:3.53.1~), but that is not
sufficient. https fails completely with libnss3 2:3.58-1. It works with
2
Hello security team, hello Hugo, I hope you are doing well!
I have just uploaded a NMU for xcftools fixing CVE-2019-5086 and CVE-2019-5087.
The new patch also addresses the 32 bit portability issues. The basic idea
behind it is to limit possible values of width and height (which can only be
posit
Package: firefox-esr
Version: 78.7.0esr-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
firefox-esr (both the latest version 78.8.0esr-1 and the latest testing
version 78.7.0esr-1) depends on libnss3 (>= 2:3.53.1~), but that is not
sufficient. https fails completely with libnss3 2:3.58-1. It works with
2
Control: reassign -1 src:libdebian-installer 0.120
On Mi, 24 feb 21, 07:32:11, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: src: libdebian-installer
> Version: 0.120
> Tags: patch
>
> allow to build the package without udebs.
>
> patch at
> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/524724757/libdebian-installer_0.120ub
After this bug is open for nearly 3 years trousers is still uninstallable on
certain systems with bullseye. Even with no tpm installed trousers is needed
for tpm emulation in qemu.
This is a current Lenovo Thinkpad T14s with TPM enabled.
flo@p5:~$ ls -la /dev/tpm*
crw-rw 1 tss tss 10, 2
Control: found -1 4.5.1527308405.8b586d5-4.2
Hi Frédéric, Hideki,
On 17-02-2021 22:01, Paul Gevers wrote:
> If the forth time worked because of sheer luck, then please no, keep the
> bug open until the build is less flaky. We need packages to be build
> without failure [1]. Having to baby-sit fla
Good morning Stefan,
Am Donnerstag, dem 25.02.2021 um 01:14 +0100 schrieb Stefan Schindler:
> Package: lftp
> Version: 4.9.2; reported 2020-02-25
> Severity: important
>
> The upstream has released multiple packages since 2018 when the last
> debian package was fetched.
> * https://github.com/lav
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Stefano,
On 25-02-2021 07:17, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> TL;DR: Debian heard of some upstream Python grumpyness about our
> standard library splits, recently.
We have more upstreams being grumpy how we handle things in Debian.
> This is all very badly timed for the
> f
Hi,
As a simple fix - Not beeing able to start trousers should not fail the
installation - So the first fix should be to change the invoke-rc.d in
postinst to this:
invoke-rc.d trousers $_dh_action || exit 0
Then for all checks whether there is a tpm device one could use
something like
Hi Markus,
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 09:11:47AM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Hello security team, hello Hugo, I hope you are doing well!
>
> I have just uploaded a NMU for xcftools fixing CVE-2019-5086 and
> CVE-2019-5087.
> The new patch also addresses the 32 bit portability issues. The basic
Control: reassign -1 autopkgtest
Control: forcemerge 906424 -1
On Wed, 24 Feb 2021 at 09:19:05 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 11:12:30AM +0900, Ryutaroh Matsumoto wrote:
> > Autopkg test scripts in some packages assume that
> > an ordinary user (e.g. debci) in the testbed
Hi!
Sorry I missed voting for this. My email had been broken due to my personal
domain being down and I didn't get the emails. Just for the record...
> ===BEGIN
>
> The Technical Committee recommends that Christoph Berg be
> appointed by the Debian Project Leader to the Technical Committee.
>
Dear Maintainers
my bug report contained the neccessary information to understand the whole
problem, but it is quite complex.
FIXING bullseye NFS4 Kerberos with SAMBA
Probably debian uses an outdated version of rpc.gssd , SAMBA behaves 100%
correctly and someone removed support for weak rpc.gs
> > [binutils-or1k-elf] build-depends on gcc-10-source.
> Do you mean binutils-source here?
Of course.
Copy/paste error from the similar ITP bug for gcc-ork1k-elf.
> > * Package name: binutils-or1k-elf
> I am wondering whether it is a good idea to package this separately from
> binutils. Even
Package: grub2-common
Version: 2.02+dfsg1-20+deb10u3
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
* We use grub-install while preparing a new system in chrooted environment.
* After upgrade from 2.02+dfsg1-20+deb10u2 to 2.02+dfsg1-20+deb10u3,
grub-install stopped to install files in /boot/grub
Control: severity -1 serious
Hi,
On Fri, 27 May 2016 13:59:49 +0200 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> I just had espresso decrufted to remove the outdated armel build, thus
> downgrading the severity.
Unfortunately there has been a successful build in the mean time and
your package now doesn't migrate
Source: mame
Version: 0.228+dfsg.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Hi Maintainer,
Your last upload of mime FTBFS on armel and mipsel.
Paul
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=mame
tail on armel:
/usr/bin/ld.gold: fatal error: ../../../../../mame: mmap: failed to
allocate 372463976
Package: nfs-common
Version: 1:1.3.4-2.5+deb10u1
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainers
There is a long standing bug (or wrong documentation) in rpc.gssd
Probably debian uses an outdated version (new upstream version).
I consider this bug as severe because it breaks backward compa-
Package: qemu
Version: 1:5.2+dfsg-6
Followup-For: Bug #940533
X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de, Marc Haber
This bug is still pertinent. I’ve reproduced it locally right now as:
# mount an RPi Debian buster image (pristine Debian/arm64, not Raspian)
$ sudo losetup /dev/loop3 ~/tmp/rpi.img
$ sudo kpa
Dear Dennis, thanks for your reply.
I was rather wondering if setting Rules-Requires-Root to yes in d/rules
will ask to bbuild to act as "needs-root" for autopkgtest.
Jerome
Marc Haber dixit:
>> whereas sudo reads the
>> tty from it, making it fail in chroots using qemu-user-static.
>
>How exactly does sudo fail? Is this worth reporting upstream?
Basically sudo does not ask for the password because it cannot
find its tty. I’ve mailed to the bugreport with you in X-De
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Porte
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, deb...@microjoe.org
* Package name: python-svgelements
Version : 1.4.3
Upstream Author : tatarize
* URL : https://github.com/meerk40t/svgelements
* License : Expa
I unfortunately pasted the wrong link to the redhat forum for further
description of the bug.
The correct one:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925346
Kind regards,
user2304
--
mail: user2...@web.de
Hi
On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 at 10:07, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 2/14/21 5:58 PM, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> Obviously, the transitional packages would ideally be built by src:gcc-10
>> rather than being a separate source package, and Ryan only prototyped them
>> as a separate source package to be able
Javier,
seeing that you do not seem to have been working on cron for a few years
would it be OK with you if I posted something along these lines to
debian-devel:
Request for adoption/request for help: cron
cron's recently active maintainer has removed himself from its
uploaders.
Hi,
There is a change merged in upstream which should fix this issue.
Details at: https://github.com/OfflineIMAP/offlineimap3/pull/56
It will be great if you can test the latest HEAD from github and
confirm if it fixes the issue.
I can give you a deb package if that is easier.
But in any case, I t
Source: cdebootstrap
Version: 0.7.7
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
Control: affects -1 src:debian-archive-keyring
[X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org,
debian-archive-keyr...@packages.debian.org]
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent
Roger Leigh wrote...
> I was having a think about this last night. To be completely
> realistic, schroot maintenance is very low on my list of my
> priorities. Work on it is sporadic at best. My interest in it is
> also fairly low. I’ve moved on to other things.
That's sad to hear.
> I don’t
Control: retitle 900874 ITA: schroot -- Execute commands in a chroot
Raphaël Hertzog wrote...
> I just orphaned the schroot package. I never really want to assume its
> maintainance but it just happened that at some point I was unhappy with
> unresolved bugs with pending patches and someone had t
Source: debuerreotype
Version: 0.10-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
Control: affects -1 src:debian-archive-keyring
[X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org,
debian-archive-keyr...@packages.debian.org]
Dear maintainer(s),
With a rece
Source: debuerreotype
Version: 0.10-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fails-always
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it always fails on
non-amd64 architectures. Looking at the error message, i
Package: cockpit-ws
Version: 238-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
When trying for a read-only root filesystem, I am blocked by the fact
that cockpit tries to write in /etc at startup:
Feb 03 17:12:09 kruppe systemd[1]: Starting Cockpit Web Service...
Feb 03 17:12:09 kruppe remotectl[693]: rem
Source: paperwork
Version: 2.0.2-2
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of paperwork the autopkgtest of paperwork fails in
testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary pack
On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 20:00:33 +0100 Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 22.02.2021 um 18:57 schrieb Harald Dunkel:
> Sorry to say, but this is not a fix. A fix would avoid the race
> condition, no matter whats written in the config files.
>
> Your "fix" is just a workaround. If I add
If you have a better
Source: python2.7
Version: 2.7.18-2
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of python2.7 the autopkgtest of python2.7 fails in
testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary pac
Hi mainteners,
Given the observations, I feel it very likely being caused by
misfiring of restore_backup_on_exit(), and looking around the source
tree I found something suspicious:
In the commit 5dec0f2f9cd4d4dd0109c25cd2b399a780179020,
| unix exec: avoid atexit handlers when child exits
| Needed
On 2/22/21 7:29 AM, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> It needs to be ported to use proj.h instead of proj_api.h which has been
> removed.
While upstream has added support for proj.h this may not be easy to get
into the vtk9 Debian package.
Like with vtk6 (#931943) & vtk7 (#931943) you may want to use the
Package: doas
Version: 6.8.1-2
Severity: important
The manpage of doas.conf(5) says that the persist option can be user to make
doas not ask for the user's password every time the command is ran.
Unfortunately, this option seems to be broken, as it doesn't do anything.
Thanks for packaging this
Source: pytorch
Version: 1.7.1-7
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: g...@nonempty.org
Dear Maintainer,
It would be nice to have a python-torch-doc package with the HTML
documentation available, if it's not a complicated process. This is of
course not urgent.
I can look into the matter after the Bu
Am 22.02.21 um 10:15 schrieb Sébastien Delafond:
On 19/02 13:53, Bastian Germann wrote:
* Package name: mupdf
Version : 1.14.0+ds1-4+deb10u3
[...]
* Avoid a use-after-free in fz_drop_band_writer (CVE-2020-16600)
Hi Bastian,
thanks for your work on this. We think this update
Am 25.02.21 um 08:30 schrieb Christian Borntraeger:
>
> On 24.02.21 23:40, dann frazier wrote:
>> Source: s390-tools
>> Version: 2.15.1-2
>>
>> I'm one of the maintainers of kdump-tools, which has a need to manipulate
>> the kernel command line parameters in boot loader configurations.
>> Currently
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 05:28:54PM +0400, Сергей Дмитриенко wrote:
> No. I have an account, but the button "Login" doesn't respond when clicked.
>
> And the same error in kern.log:
>
> Feb 25 17:07:44 z61t kernel: [21036.696350] do_trap: 7 callbacks suppressed
> Feb 25 17:07:44 z61t kernel: [2103
Package: src:cdebconf
Version: 0.256
Tags: patch
allow to build without udeb packages.
patch at
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/525019047/cdebconf_0.256ubuntu2_0.256ubuntu3.diff.gz
Package: src:bind9-libs
Version: 1:9.11.19+dfsg-2
Tags: patch
allow to build without udeb packages. I didn't figure out how to avoid the extra
udeb build for that case. So just produce the non udeb binary packages.
patch at
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/525016225/bind9-libs_1%3A9.11.19+dfsg-2ubun
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mayco Souza Berghetti
* Package name: netproc
Version : 0.5.5
Upstream Author : Mayco Souza Berghetti
* URL : https://github.com/berghetti/netproc/
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: C
Description : tool to mon
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 11:50:01AM +, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> There is a change merged in upstream which should fix this issue.
> Details at: https://github.com/OfflineIMAP/offlineimap3/pull/56
>
> It will be great if you can test the latest HEAD from github and
> confirm if it fixes the issu
Hi Mayco
On 2/25/21 3:31 PM, Mayco Souza Berghetti wrote:
> I intend on maintaining this package,
> looking for a sponsor.
I'm using netproc myself and I'm happy to sponsor you.
Please contact me off-list by sending me link to your packages to review.
Regards,
Daniel
Source: caja
Severity: important
Due to smart working increase, I recently installed mate for our users at job,
with
x2go/vnc servers. Soon, I found that caja randomly starts to cause high cpu
loads,
and having autodir even installed it also started to log tons of messages
like:
/var/log/syslo
tags #976244 confirmed pending
thanks
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 10:40:10PM -0500, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> So, I think that after nearly a quarter century taking care of sudo in
> Debian, it's time someone else took over the package.
A new sudo team has formed and will take over the package. As soon a
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 06:37:28PM +0400, Сергей Дмитриенко wrote:
> *$ JavaScriptCoreUseJIT=0 epiphany***
>
> Yes! It work!
Ok, that's good to know.
> Linux z61t 4.19.0-14-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.19.171-2 (2021-01-30) x86_64
> GNU/Linux
>
> Linux debian 4.19.0-14-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 4.19.171-2
Package: libthai
Version: 0.1.28-3
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu hirsute ubuntu-patch
Dear maintainers,
In Ubuntu, we are in the process of moving the i386 architecture to a
compatibility-only layer on amd64, and therefore we are also movi
Package: general
Severity: normal
I was angry with my Internet provider because on their site since
several weeks the chat was reported as not available. It appeared the
chat works all the time in any Windows browser.
Today I tried to order some goods by Internet, by I was unable to select
the in
Package: dovecot-core
Version: 2.3.4.1-5+deb10u1
Severity: important
Tags: patch upstream
Dear Maintainer,
the issue can be found on the dovecot mailing list:
https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2021-February/121478.html
When using sssd as nss plugin, fast repeating calls to `doveadm user *`
Package: live-boot-doc
Version: 1:20210208
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
Reading information about booting using PXE and live cd. Found out that the
spanish translation is wrong,
The url as example should read as the english version: http://1.2.3.4/
On /usr/share/man/es/man7
--- live-boot.
Package: libhandy-1
Version: 1.0.3-2
Could you update to 1.1 in experimental? That's required by some GNOME
40~beta updates which we are uploading to experimental
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 6:21 AM Stefan Haberland wrote:
>
> Am 25.02.21 um 08:30 schrieb Christian Borntraeger:
> >
> > On 24.02.21 23:40, dann frazier wrote:
> >> Source: s390-tools
> >> Version: 2.15.1-2
> >>
> >> I'm one of the maintainers of kdump-tools, which has a need to manipulate
> >> the
Drogi przyjacielu
Przepraszam za niedogodności; Nazywam się Willson J. Mutanda, z Pretorii,
osobista pomoc dla (pana Andrew Bretta Marczaka), jak ci wcześniej
wyjaśniłem. Pan Andrew jest wykonawcą wydobycia złota i diamentów oraz
biznesmenem w Afryce Południowej, który zmarł kilka lat temu. Piszę
Hi,
I don't want to start a discussion. So no need to reply. I just wanted to
clarify some things.
Quoting Sam Hartman (2021-02-24 23:12:11)
> I'm not at all convinced this is a good idea. We're replacing a great,
> well-tested facility--namely running maintainer scripts in root directories
> wi
Hi all,
Am 12.03.19 um 19:06 schrieb Joachim Nilsson:
Yes indeed, that seems to be the case. The tests require a bit
of love and encouragement to get into shape.
Just a short update. In today's upload I removed the requirement of
machine level isolation which will make the autopkgtest run in
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Dear stable release managers,
Please consider python-django (1:1.11.29-1+deb10u1) for buster:
python-django (1:1.11.29-1+deb10u1) buster; urgency=high
.
* CVE-2021-23336:
tags #945366 - patch
thanks
On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 06:01:51PM +, Edward Neville wrote:
> Entries in sudoers files that include * do not behave like shell globs.
> When mistakenly used in the argument list it can expand to protected
> content, such as /etc/shadow. Most users do not expect this
Sébastien Delafond wrote:
> > > Django is vulnerable because it embeds parse_qsl:
> > >
> > > https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/feb/19/security-releases/
> >
> > Security team, let me know if you would like an update for stable.
[…]
> we think this should rather go via s-p-u.
ACK. Hav
I'm setting a calendar note to come back tho this in May.
Apologies for not having time sooner; I'm in the middle of planning for
a move and trying to deal with bullseye issues.
On 2021-02-25 17:43+0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> ...
> I am removing the patch tag since Debian is not going to take this
> patch if upstream doesn't. The functionality will be included in
> Debian when upstream makes a release with the functionality included.
>
> The patch has been forwarded to up
The proposed Workaround to /usr/share/hplip/data/models/ and alter
[hp_laserjet_cp1025] to [hp_laserjet_cp_1025] is working.
Thanks.
user2304
--
mail: user2...@web.de
Control: reassign -1 piuparts-slave-from-git-deps
On Mon, 14 May 2018 11:34:37 +0200 Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Adrian Bunk , 2018-03-15, 21:22:
>adequate already seems to try to check this, but for some reason it
>doesn't find the libinput-dev problem.
adequate checks these dependencies only if th
Hello Paul,
hello Holger,
manpages-it comes back, just from a new source package
(manpages-l10n). The reason this was delayed is that I cannot get this
through NEW myself, as I'm only a Debian Maintainer, so I needed a
sponsor (Toddy is currently unavailable). This has been resolved, so
now manpage
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Dear stable release managers,
Please consider redis (5:5.0.3-4+deb10u3) for buster:
redis (5:5.0.3-4+deb10u3) buster; urgency=medium
.
* CVE-2021-21309: Fix a series of int
Package: blhc
Version: 0.12-2
Severity: normal
Hi,
for the aide package, blhc complains about missing CFLAGS (-fPIE), see
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=aide&arch=amd64&ver=0.17.3-1&stamp=1613025725&raw=0
However, aide uses dpkg-buildflags correctly, it is just the case that
dpk
Package: mailman3
Version: 3.2.1-1
What do you think about providing a backport of mailman3 3.3.3-1 for Buster?
I'm about to setup mailman for a German organization that would like to have
localized messages. But those are only available in 3.3.3.
This would of course only make sense together w
Hello
Could you please try to have it merged upstream ?
thanks
Cheers,
S
Le 23/02/2021 à 16:15, Mike Gabriel a écrit :
Package: fail2ban
Severity: whislist
Tags: patch
Hi,
today I worked on a fail2ban filter rule that is able to filter out
log lines from scanlogd. The scanlogd daemon is a
Hi Moritz,
> given that this only affects 32 bit archs and only with an inherently insecure
> setup (opening up the default bulk size to such high values might impact all
> kinds of stability / availability I guess) I don't think this needs a DSA.
> So s-p-u or piggybacking with the next DSA seems
Control: tag -1 + confirmed sid bullseye
I looked into this the past days, and I think this is actually a bug
in d/rules in src:linphone. I'm beginning to suspect that this is due
to this line:
-DENABLE_DB_STORAGE=NO \
Apparently the code for the once separate chat history and c
I think this bug is due to the switch to fai for testing/bullseye.
IIRC with fai, we run a dhcp client for each interface, which would
cause the double IP adresses you see (one set up by DHCP, one set up by
Vagrant directly over ssh when booting the VM)
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 12:05:39PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> I was rather wondering if setting Rules-Requires-Root to yes in d/rules
> will ask to bbuild to act as "needs-root" for autopkgtest.
No. Rules-Requires-Root is only to tell the build scripts that some
parts of the build requires rea
Control: tags -1 patch
On 2/21/21 1:21 PM, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> Your package FTBFS with PROJ 8.0.0:
>
> /usr/include/proj.h:123:4: error: #error "The proj_api.h header has been
> removed from PROJ with version 8.0.0"
>123 | #error "The proj_api.h header has been removed from PROJ with
Le Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 07:35:16AM +0100, Marriott NZ a écrit :
>
> run-mailcap fails if run as "open" on file names containing special
> characters.
> It also allows shell command injection from file names (again:
> https://www.debian.org/security/2014/dsa-3114).
Thanks Mariott for the head-up
Package: fastboot
Version: 1:10.0.0+r36-7
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: schissdra...@rmm.li
When trying to flash a recovery to my smartphone (poco x3). It hangs forever at
Sending 'recovery' (131072 KB)
After a while an error appears in dmesg:
[227526.825738] INFO: task fastboot:960640 blocked f
This really is a useless bug report. How can anyone try to duplicate it?
You do not tell anyone who your internet provider is, How you try to get
the "chat", what internet site you go to, and what kind of goods you
select.
In linux.debian.devel, you wrote:
> Package: general
> Severity: normal
>
On Thu, Feb 25 2021 at 10:27 -08, William Unruh wrote:
> This really is a useless bug report. How can anyone try to duplicate it?
> You do not tell anyone who your internet provider is, How you try to get
> the "chat", what internet site you go to, and what kind of goods you
> select.
The chat is
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@debian.org
debdiff below fixes three security issues, which don't warrant a DSA by itself.
Update has been tested on a Buster few systems (and verified with the P
Control: tags -1 patch
On 2/21/21 7:23 AM, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> Your package FTBFS with PROJ 8.0.0:
>
> /usr/include/proj.h:345:23: error: type alias redefinition with different
> types ('struct pj_ctx' vs 'struct projCtx_t') [clang-diagnostic-error]
> typedef struct pj_ctx PJ_CONTEXT;
>
Package: fastboot
Version: 1:10.0.0+r36-7
Followup-For: Bug #983530
X-Debbugs-Cc: schissdra...@rmm.li
I've just realized. It doesn't have anything to do with the fastboot version.
It only accidentally worked with the new one.
As it seems the only way to make it work is (independently the version):
Hi Paul (2021.02.25_08:58:36_+)
> > Including a python3-full and python3.x-full packages, that Depends on
> > the entire stdlib, is a compromise position to help them to support
> > Python users on Debian (and derivative) platforms.
>
> This is the piece we're missing. What is it in Debian tha
Version: 1.9.5-1
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 11:35:35AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> please consider adding a more descriptive manpage avoiding EBNF syntax.
The sudoers man page still has EBNF, but has become a lot more
descriptive. I am therefore closing this bug for version 1.9.5, because
I cann
Package: freecad
Version: 0.19~pre1+git20210207.a3fb41502b+dfsg-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: a...@wotcc.org.uk
Dear Maintainer,
When following Help -> About FreeCAD
The version number is blank
Using the copy to clipboard button it shows the version but not the build
number.
Shown is
Vers
The systemd unit file should recreate the folder each time the service
is started. It uses /var/run/mosquitto instead of /run/mosquitto, but
that should work through the /var/run symlink.
Does this definitely not work for you?
On Wed, 24 Feb 2021 at 01:15, Alexandre Detiste
wrote:
>
> Package: m
In adapting your first patch, I narrowed things down a bit.
I search /etc/pam.d files containing only a-z0-9A-Z, which I believe
should catch all the active pam.d files but not editor backups, .pam-new
files and the like.
I also specifically recommend looking at pam_faillock.
--Sam
Control: found -1 3.20.11+dfsg0-2
Control: found -1 3.21.2+dfsg1-1
On Thu, 2021-02-25 at 18:32 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> I'll see if I can upgrade and repeat.
Confirmed I see this with both the current bullseye and sid versions of
printer-driver-hpcups.
Ian.
notforwarded #192522
thanks
# this is not an upstream issue
On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 10:11:03PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> [? maybe not but it left me with one dead box, so I'm inclined to
> inflate right now, downgrade if you want...]
>
> I just upgraded a hideous potato/sid hybrid box to woody
Found this in the junk e-mails today...
Am 23.02.21 um 19:20 schrieb Sebastiaan Couwenberg:
There is still a test failure, though. Refer to the attached buildlog
for details.
This seems unrelated to PROJ 8.0.0.
The failing test creates a QTemporaryFile, removes all permissions from
the file
Hi Chris,
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 04:47:34PM +, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Sébastien Delafond wrote:
>
> > > > Django is vulnerable because it embeds parse_qsl:
> > > >
> > > > https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/feb/19/security-releases/
> > >
> > > Security team, let me know if you would
Package: sbuild
Version: 0.79.1-1~bpo10+1
Severity: normal
Hi,
When passing -v via debbuildopt in conjunction with
--source-only-changes, the source-only changes file only includes the
most recent changelog entry as if the -v option was not present. The
arch-specific changes file does include the
Hi Chris,
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 04:42:55PM +, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: buster
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
>
> Dear stable release managers,
>
> Please consider python-django (1:1.11.29-1+deb10u1) for buster
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:24:58AM +0100, Balint Reczey wrote:
> Please consider shipping an Apport hook like many other packages in Debian.
> I attached the patch carried in Ubuntu for adding the hook, please
> consider merging it.
Your python script has a shebang line /usr/bin/python, which many
On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 at 04:18, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it always fails on
> non-amd64 architectures. Looking at the error message, it seems to
> compare the build tar ball with a pre-computed hash that's only valid on
> amd64. (And then the log becomes
The file rules.patch got mangled in transit. Attached is the
integrous version.
rules.patch.gz
Description: application/gzip
Hi,
Il 18/02/21 20:46, Helmut Grohne ha scritto:
The affected packages cannot satisfy their cross Build-Depends, because
their transitive dependency on the host architecture Python interpreter
is not installable. The host architecture Python interpreter is required
from libboost-python1.74-dev -
1 - 100 of 167 matches
Mail list logo
